Adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Reprogramming the breast tumor immune microenvironment: cold-to-hot transition for enhanced immunotherapy

This review discusses reprogramming the breast tumor immune microenvironment from an immunosuppressive cold state to an immunologically active hot state. A complex interplay is revealed, in which the accumulation of metabolic byproducts-such as lactate, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and ammonia-is shown to impair T-cell function and promote tumor immune escape. It is demonstrated that the tumor microenvironment (TME) is dominated by immunosuppressive cytokines, including interleukin-10 (IL-10), transforming growth factorβ (TGFβ), and IL-35. Notably, IL-35 is produced by regulatory T cells and breast cancer cells. The conversion of conventional T cells into IL-35-producing induced regulatory T cells, along with the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, contributes to the suppression of anti-tumor immunity. It is further demonstrated that key immune checkpoint molecules-such as PD-1, PDL1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, and TIGIT-are upregulated within the TME, leading to Tcell exhaustion and diminished immune responses. The blockade of these checkpoints is shown to restore T-cell functionality and is proposed as a strategy to convert cold tumors into hot ones with robust effector cell infiltration. The therapeutic potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)T cell therapy is also explored, and targeting specific tumor-associated antigens, such as glycoproteins and receptor tyrosine kinases, is highlighted. It is suggested that CART cell efficacy can be enhanced by combining these cells with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunomodulatory agents, thereby overcoming the barriers imposed by the immunosuppressive TME. Moreover, the role of the microbiome in regulating estrogen metabolism and systemic inflammation is reviewed. Alterations in the gut microbiota are shown to affect the TME, and microbiome-based interventions are proposed as an additional means to facilitate the cold-to-hot transition. It is concluded that by targeting the metabolic and immunological pathways that underpin immune suppression-through combination strategies involving checkpoint blockade, CART cell therapies, and microbiome modulation-the conversion of the breast TME from cold to hot can be achieved. This reprogramming is anticipated to enhance immune cell infiltration and function, thereby improving the overall efficacy of immunotherapies and leading to better clinical outcomes for breast cancer patients.

Intratumoral Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second highest cause of cancer death in females. Metastatic recurrence that is resistant to traditional therapies presents a major challenge, necessitating the development of an innovative treatment strategy. Immunotherapy has gained popularity in the treatment of cancer, particularly melanoma, lung cancer, and more recently breast cancer. Major developments in immunotherapy have been made with a better understanding of the tumor microenvironment and how the microenvironment can be manipulated to induce an anti-tumor immune response. Intratumorally delivered immunotherapy can be used to create a local immune response. This review provides a comprehensive overview of intratumoral immunotherapy for breast cancer and its resultant changes in the tumor microenvironment. The discussed immunotherapeutics include oncolytic viruses, nucleic acids, innate immune agonists, bacteria, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and dendritic cells. The review also evaluates completed clinical trials using these therapies. Lastly, the review offers future perspectives in the development of breast cancer immunotherapy.

Immune Checkpoint Molecules: A Review on Pathways and Immunotherapy Implications

BACKGROUND

Today, treating cancer patients with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), by targeting immune checkpoints, is one of the most outstanding immunotherapeutic methods. Immune checkpoints are special molecules having regulatory role in immune system responses. Once these molecules are presented on cancer cells, these cells will be capable of evading the immune system through their own specific pathways. This Evasion can be prevented by counterbalancing immune system responses with immune checkpoints related antibodies.

AIMS

The current study aimed to highlight immunotherapy and its methods, describe the immune checkpoints pathways, outline the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and recent advances in this field, and sketch an outlook on the best treatment options for the most prevalent cancers.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This research implemented a narrative review method. A comprehensive literature review on the history, molecular and cellular biology, and the clinical aspects of immune checkpoint molecules was performed to illustrate the pathways involved in various cancers. Also, currently-available and future potential immunotherapies targeting these pathways were extracted from the searched studies.

RESULTS

The immune checkpoint family consists of many molecules, including CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT. Attempts to modify these molecules in cancer treatment led to the development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Most of these antibodies have entered clinical studies and some of them have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used in cancer patients' treatment plans.

DISCUSSION

With these novel treatments and the combination therapies they offer, there is also hope for better treatment outcomes for the previously untreatable metastatic cancers. In spite of the beneficial aspects of immune checkpoint therapy, similar to other treatments, they may cause side effects in some patients. Therefore, more studies are needed to reduce the probable side effects and uncover their underlying mechanism.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data shown in this review, there is still a lack of knowledge about the complete properties of ICIs and the possible combination therapies that we may be able to implement to achieve a better treatment response in cancer patients.

Biomarkers in the Immuno-oncology Interface of Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review with Perioperative Considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Identification of biomarkers for immunotherapy treatment in triple negative breast cancer remains crucial for improving outcomes and optimising regimes, particularly in the perioperative setting. There is a need to conduct a scoping review to provide an overview of current research, explore the wider context, and highlight future research considerations in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most commonly assessed biomarkers are PD-L1, TILs and CD8 + cells with correlation to outcomes mainly focused on survival. There is a growing interest in evaluating genetic markers. Conclusions are currently limited by knowledge gaps around contextual factors. Important areas of focus for future research include a greater understanding of complex cellular, genetic and metabolic interactions in the perioperative tumour microenvironment, including patient-specific immune profiles. An important challenge remains elucidating the clinical significance of the immunological effects of interventions at each stage of the perioperative period, including the use of anaesthetic agents.

Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy to treat breast cancer: current development in clinical and preclinical studies

Breast cancer poses one of the largest threats to women's health. Treatment continues to improve for all the subtypes of breast cancer, but some subtypes, such as triple negative breast cancer, still present a significant treatment challenge. Additionally, metastasis and local recurrence are two prevalent problems in breast cancer treatment. A newer type of therapy, immunotherapy, may offer alternatives to traditional treatments for difficult-to-treat subtypes. Immunotherapy engages the host's immune system to eradicate disease, with the potential to induce long-lasting, durable responses. However, systemic immunotherapy is only approved in a limited number of indications, and it benefits only a minority of patients. Furthermore, immune related toxicities following systemic administration of potent immunomodulators limit dosing and, consequently, efficacy. To address these safety considerations and improve treatment efficacy, interest in local delivery at the site of the tumor has increased. Numerous intratumorally delivered immunotherapeutics have been and are being explored clinically and preclinically, including monoclonal antibodies, cellular therapies, viruses, nucleic acids, cytokines, innate immune agonists, and bacteria. This review summarizes the current and past intratumoral immunotherapy clinical landscape in breast cancer as well as current progress that has been made in preclinical studies, with a focus on delivery parameters and considerations.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with primary liver cancer and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated adrenal insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is a rare, but potentially serious adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to examine the incidence, clinical features and the clinical correlation between occurrence of AI and efficacy in primary liver cancer (PLC) patients treated with ICIs; and to evaluate the significance of the continuation of ICIs treatment in PLC patients who developed AI.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and March 2022, 47 PLC patients with ICIs-associated AI (AI cohort) were screened from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan university, a general hospital in China. Between December 2019 and August 2021, 419 PLC patients who were treated with ICIs were reviewed to identify those without immune- associated adverse events (irAEs) (control cohort). Clinical features and outcomes of the PLC patients from the two cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

Totally, 47 PLC patients with AI (AI cohort) and 63 PLC patients without irAEs (control cohort) were included. The incidence of grades 3-4 of AI and all irAEs were 40.4 % and 48.9 %, respectively. The median three-year survival was significantly longer in the AI cohort than that in the control cohort (26.3 months (95 % CI: 18.9--33.5) vs.16.1 months (95 % CI:10.4--21.7); p = 0.021). Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression model showed that the development of AI remained significantly associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.561; p = 0.033) in the adjusted regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that PLC patients undergoing ICIs therapy and developing AI after ICIs treatment had favorable survival outcomes compared to those without irAEs.

Timing of anti-PD-L1 antibody initiation affects efficacy/toxicity of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

More than half of the patients treated with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) do not achieve durable remission, which may be partly due to PD-1/PD-L1-associated CAR T-cell dysfunction. We report data from a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02706405), in which adults with LBCL were treated with autologous CD19 CAR T cells (JCAR014) combined with escalating doses of the anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, durvalumab, starting either before or after CAR T-cell infusion. The addition of durvalumab to JCAR014 was safe and not associated with increased autoimmune or immune effector cell-associated toxicities. Patients who started durvalumab before JCAR014 infusion had later onset and shorter duration of cytokine release syndrome and inferior efficacy, which was associated with slower accumulation of CAR T cells and lower concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in the blood. Initiation of durvalumab before JCAR014 infusion resulted in an early increase in soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) levels that coincided with the timing of maximal CAR T-cell accumulation in the blood. In vitro, sPD-L1 induced dose-dependent suppression of CAR T-cell effector function, which could contribute to inferior efficacy observed in patients who received durvalumab before JCAR014. Despite the lack of efficacy improvement and similar CAR T-cell kinetics early after infusion, ongoing durvalumab therapy after JCAR014 was associated with re-expansion of CAR T cells in the blood, late regression of CD19+ and CD19- tumors, and enhanced duration of response. Our results indicate that the timing of initiation of PD-L1 blockade is a key variable that affects outcomes after CD19 CAR T-cell immunotherapy for adults with LBCL.

[18F]FDG PET/CT for predicting triple-negative breast cancer outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab

PURPOSE

To determine if pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT could contribute to predicting complete pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab.

METHODS

In this retrospective bicentric study, we included TNBC patients who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemo-immunotherapy (NACI) between March 2017 and August 2022. Clinical, biological, and pathological data were collected. Tumor SUVmax and total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) were measured from the PET images. Cut-off values were determined using ROC curves and a multivariable model was developed using logistic regression to predict pCR.

RESULTS

N = 191 patients were included. pCR rates were 53 and 70% in patients treated with NAC (N = 91) and NACI (N = 100), respectively (p < 0.01). In univariable analysis, high Ki67, high tumor SUVmax (> 12.3), and low TMTV (≤ 3.0 cm3) were predictors of pCR in the NAC cohort while tumor staging classification (< T3), BRCA1/2 germline mutation, high tumor SUVmax (> 17.2), and low TMTV (≤ 7.3 cm3) correlated with pCR in the NACI cohort. In multivariable analysis, only high tumor SUVmax (NAC: OR 8.8, p < 0.01; NACI: OR 3.7, p = 0.02) and low TMTV (NAC: OR 6.6, p < 0.01; NACI: OR 3.5, p = 0.03) were independent factors for pCR in both cohorts, albeit at different thresholds.

CONCLUSION

High tumor metabolism (SUVmax) and low tumor burden (TMTV) could predict pCR after NAC regardless of the addition of pembrolizumab. Further studies are warranted to validate such findings and determine how these biomarkers could be used to guide neoadjuvant therapy in TNBC patients.

Leveraging cryoablation and checkpoint inhibitors for high-risk triple negative breast cancer

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer among women in the United States in which the standard of care treatment is surgery with adjunctive therapy. Cryoablation, which destroys the tumor using extremely cold temperatures while preserving the potential tumor antigens, is a promising alternative to surgical resection. It is less invasive, cosmetically appeasing, cost-effective, and capable of contributing to the abscopal effect - the immune response targeting potential distant metastasis. However, to maximize the immunologic benefit of cryoablation in biologically high-risk breast cancers, combination with therapies that enhance immune activation, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be necessary. This mini review describes the fundamentals of cryoablation and treatment with ICIs, as well as discuss the caveats in both strategies and current clinical trials aimed to improve this approach to benefit patients.

Development of an Anti-canine PD-L1 Antibody and Caninized PD-L1 Mouse Model as Translational Research Tools for the Study of Immunotherapy in Humans

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy, one of the most promising cancer immunotherapies, has shown remarkable clinical impact in multiple cancer types. Despite the recent success of immune checkpoint blockade therapy, however, the response rates in patients with cancer are limited (∼20%-40%). To improve the success of immune checkpoint blockade therapy, relevant preclinical animal models are essential for the development and testing of multiple combination approaches and strategies. Companion dogs naturally develop several types of cancer that in many respects resemble clinical cancer in human patients. Therefore, the canine studies of immuno-oncology drugs can generate knowledge that informs and prioritizes new immuno-oncology therapy in humans. The challenge has been, however, that immunotherapeutic antibodies targeting canine immune checkpoint molecules such as canine PD-L1 (cPD-L1) have not been commercially available. Here, we developed a new cPD-L1 antibody as an immuno-oncology drug and characterized its functional and biological properties in multiple assays. We also evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of cPD-L1 antibodies in our unique caninized PD-L1 mice. Together, these in vitro and in vivo data, which include an initial safety profile in laboratory dogs, support development of this cPD-L1 antibody as an immune checkpoint inhibitor for studies in dogs with naturally occurring cancer for translational research. Our new therapeutic antibody and caninized PD-L1 mouse model will be essential translational research tools in raising the success rate of immunotherapy in both dogs and humans.

Significance

Our cPD-L1 antibody and unique caninized mouse model will be critical research tools to improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in both dogs and humans. Furthermore, these tools will open new perspectives for immunotherapy applications in cancer as well as other autoimmune diseases that could benefit a diverse and broader patient population.

Current therapeutic approaches and promising perspectives of using bioengineered peptides in fighting chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer

Breast cancer is a collation of malignancies that manifest in the mammary glands at the early stages. Among breast cancer subtypes, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) shows the most aggressive behavior, with apparent stemness features. Owing to the lack of response to hormone therapy and specific targeted therapies, chemotherapy remains the first line of the TNBC treatment. However, the acquisition of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents increase therapy failure, and promotes cancer recurrence and distant metastasis. Invasive primary tumors are the birthplace of cancer burden, though metastasis is a key attribute of TNBC-associated morbidity and mortality. Targeting the chemoresistant metastases-initiating cells via specific therapeutic agents with affinity to the upregulated molecular targets is a promising step in the TNBC clinical management. Exploring the capacity of peptides as biocompatible entities with the specificity of action, low immunogenicity, and robust efficacy provides a principle for designing peptide-based drugs capable of increasing the efficacy of current chemotherapy agents for selective targeting of the drug-tolerant TNBC cells. Here, we first focus on the resistance mechanisms that TNBC cells acquire to evade the effect of chemotherapeutic agents. Next, the novel therapeutic approaches employing tumor-targeting peptides to exploit the mechanisms of drug resistance in chemorefractory TNBC are described.

Clinical efficacy and safety of bispecific antibodies for the treatment of solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy is a promising and progressing treatment approach for cancer. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are antibody constructs that can bind to two different epitopes. The dual-specificity of BsAbs improves their efficacy compared to monoclonal antibodies.

AREAS COVERED

Although BsAbs have achieved excellent therapeutic effects in hematologic cancers, no systematic review with meta-analysis evaluated their efficacy in solid tumors. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to establish the clinical efficacy and safety of BsAbs in solid tumors.

EXPERT OPINION

BsAbs are not associated with significantly better safety or efficacy outcomes than conventional therapies. BsAb was not associated with improvement in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). However, BsAb increased the rate of stable disease (SD) significantly. Also, BsAb substantially increased the OS and PFS and resulted in a higher frequency of DCR for uveal melanoma. Furthermore, the safety analysis showed no obvious difference in the rate of any adverse events (AEs), grade ≥3 AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in the intervention group compared to controls. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials on BsAbs in solid tumors are highly recommended.

Hepatotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: What is Currently Known

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to provide a complete hepatotoxicity profile, hepatotoxicity spectrum, and safety ranking of immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs for cancer treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, psycINFO, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. websites were searched, and a manual search of relevant reviews and trials up to January 1, 2022, was undertaken. Head-to-head III randomized controlled trials comparing any 2 or 3 of the following treatments or different doses of the same immune checkpoint inhibitor drug were included: programmed death 1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand 1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and conventional therapy. We included 106 randomized trials (n=164,782) containing 17 treatment arms.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of hepatotoxicity was 4.06%. The rate of fatal liver adverse events was 0.07%. The programmed death ligand 1 inhibitor+targeted therapy drug+chemotherapy group had the highest risk of treatment-related increases in all-grade alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, and the differences were significant. For immune-related hepatotoxicity, no significant difference was found between PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors for all-grade hepatotoxicity; however, CTLA-4 inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of grade 3-5 hepatotoxicity than PD-1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest incidence of hepatotoxicity and fatality was observed with triple therapy. The overall incidence of hepatotoxicity was similar between different dual regimens. For immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, the overall risk of immune-mediated hepatotoxicity related to CTLA-4 inhibitors did not differ significantly from that of PD-1 inhibitors. There was no direct relationship between the risk of liver injury and drug dose, whether monotherapy or combination therapy was used.

Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Combination Strategies to Improve Outcome

Due to the absence of hormone receptor (both estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors) along with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) amplification, the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cannot benefit from endocrine or anti-HER-2 therapy. For a long time, chemotherapy was the only systemic treatment for TNBC. Due to the lack of effective treatment options, the prognosis for TNBC is extremely poor. The successful application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) launched the era of immunotherapy in TNBC. However, the current findings show modest efficacy of programmed cell death- (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitors monotherapy and only a small proportion of patients can benefit from this approach. Based on the basic principles of immunotherapy and the characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in TNBC, immune combination therapy is expected to further enhance the efficacy and expand the beneficiary population of patients. Given the diversity of drugs that can be combined, it is important to select effective biomarkers to identify the target population. Moreover, the side effects associated with the combination of multiple drugs should also be considered.

The roles of metabolic profiles and intracellular signaling pathways of tumor microenvironment cells in angiogenesis of solid tumors

Innate and adaptive immune cells patrol and survey throughout the human body and sometimes reside in the tumor microenvironment (TME) with a variety of cell types and nutrients that may differ from those in which they developed. The metabolic pathways and metabolites of immune cells are rooted in cell physiology, and not only provide nutrients and energy for cell growth and survival but also influencing cell differentiation and effector functions. Nowadays, there is a growing awareness that metabolic processes occurring in cancer cells can affect immune cell function and lead to tumor immune evasion and angiogenesis. In order to safely treat cancer patients and prevent immune checkpoint blockade-induced toxicities and autoimmunity, we suggest using anti-angiogenic drugs solely or combined with Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) to boost the safety and effectiveness of cancer therapy. As a consequence, there is significant and escalating attention to discovering techniques that target metabolism as a new method of cancer therapy. In this review, a summary of immune-metabolic processes and their potential role in the stimulation of intracellular signaling in TME cells that lead to tumor angiogenesis, and therapeutic applications is provided. Video abstract.

[Induction of Uveitis by Immune-Oncologic Therapies, Namely Checkpoint Inhibitors]

BACKGROUND

The recently introduced tumor therapies including immune checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (ICI) have substantially contributed to survival and quality of life of the affected patients, but are associated with class-specific, non-toxic immune-related side effects including uveitis. This narrative review focusses to summarize the immune-related adverse event profile associated with the use of ICI.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed, the publication database of the National Institute of Health in the USA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) used the search terms "uveitis" AND "drug-induced" AND/OR "immune checkpoint inhibitor". All articles published in the last five years and the for the purpose of this review relevant cross references were evaluated.

RESULTS

A class-specific phenomenon of ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors is their capability to induce systemic and ocular autoimmunity. Ocular side effects are observed in up to 3% of patients and should be differentiated from toxic side effects, since this is not dose-dependent. Melanoma as underlying disease and Pembrolizumab as ICI significantly increase the risk. If timely recognized, systemic treatment with corticosteroids allows to preserve vision without cessation of the tumor treatment in more than 90% of these potentially life-threatening instances.

CONCLUSION

Given their impact onto the survival of cancer and namely melanoma patients, ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are increasingly used alone and in combination, which enhances their inherent risk of developing drug-induced ocular autoimmunity. Favorable functional outcomes are closely linked to early recognition and aggressive treatment of these complications considering the fact that these immune-related adverse events affect multiple organ systems and have an untreated lethality of up to 3%.

Research Progresses in Immunological Checkpoint Inhibitors for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Tumor immune escape refers to the phenomenon in which tumor cells escape the recognition and attack of the body’s immune system through various mechanisms so that they can survive and proliferate in vivo. The imbalance of immune checkpoint protein expression is the primary mechanism for breast cancer to achieve immune escape. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are critical immune checkpoints for breast cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors block the checkpoint and relieve its inhibition effect on immune cells, reactivate T-cells and destroy cancer cells and restore the body’s ability to resist tumors. At present, immunological checkpoint inhibitors have made significant progress in breast cancer immunotherapy, and it is expected to become a new treatment for breast cancer.