PIM kinase inhibitor AZD1208 in conjunction with Th1 cytokines potentiate death of breast cancer cellsin vitrowhile also maximizing suppression of tumor growthin vivo when combined with immunotherapy

PIM kinases are over-expressed by a number of solid malignancies including breast cancer, and are thought to regulate proliferation, survival, and resistance to treatment, making them attractive therapeutic targets. Because PIM kinases sit at the nexus of multiple oncodriver pathways, PIM antagonist drugs are being tested alone and in conjunction with other therapies to optimize outcomes. We therefore sought to test the combination of pharmacological PIM antagonism and Th1-associated immunotherapy. We show that the pan PIM antagonist, AZD1208, when combined in vitro with Th1 cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α, potentiates metabolic suppression, overall cell death, and expression of apoptotic markers in human breast cancer cell lines of diverse phenotypes (HER-2pos/ERneg, HER-2pos/ERpos and triple-negative). Interestingly, AZD1208 was shown to moderately inhibit IFN-γ secretion by stimulated T lymphocytes of both human and murine origin, suggesting some inherent immunosuppressive activity of the drug. Nonetheless, when multiplexed therapies were tested in a murine model of HER-2pos breast cancer, combinations of HER-2 peptide-pulsed DCs and AZD1208, as well as recombinant IFN-γ plus AZD1208 significantly suppressed tumor outgrowth compared with single-treatment and control groups. These studies suggest that PIM antagonism may combine productively with certain immunotherapies to improve responsiveness.

Reviewing the significance of dendritic cell vaccines in interrupting breast cancer development

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and is the most prevalent cancer in women. According to the U.S breast cancer statistics, about 1 in every 8 women develop an invasive form of breast cancer during their lifetime. Immunotherapy has been a significant advancement in the treatment of cancer with multiple studies reporting favourable patient outcomes by modulating the immune response to cancer cells. Here, we review the significance of dendritic cell vaccines in treating breast cancer patients. We discuss the involvement of dendritic cells and oncodrivers in breast tumorigenesis, highlighting the rationale for targeting oncodrivers and neoantigens using dendritic cell vaccine therapy. We review different dendritic cell subsets and maturation states previously used to develop vaccines and suggest the use of DC vaccines for breast cancer prevention. Further, we highlight that the intratumoral delivery of type 1 dendritic cell vaccines in breast cancer patients activates tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T helper cell type 1 (Th1) cells, promoting an anti-tumorigenic immune response while concurrently blocking pro-tumorigenic responses. In summary, this review provides an overview of the current state of dendritic cell vaccines in breast cancer highlighting the challenges and considerations necessary for an efficient dendritic cell vaccine design in interrupting breast cancer development.

Chimeric RNAs reveal putative neoantigen peptides for developing tumor vaccines for breast cancer

Introduction

We present here a strategy to identify immunogenic neoantigen candidates from unique amino acid sequences at the junctions of fusion proteins which can serve as targets in the development of tumor vaccines for the treatment of breastcancer.

Method

We mined the sequence reads of breast tumor tissue that are usually discarded as discordant paired-end reads and discovered cancer specific fusion transcripts using tissue from cancer free controls as reference. Binding affinity predictions of novel peptide sequences crossing the fusion junction were analyzed by the MHC Class I binding predictor, MHCnuggets. CD8+ T cell responses against the 15 peptides were assessed through in vitro Enzyme Linked Immunospot (ELISpot).

Results

We uncovered 20 novel fusion transcripts from 75 breast tumors of 3 subtypes: TNBC, HER2+, and HR+. Of these, the NSFP1-LRRC37A2 fusion transcript was selected for further study. The 3833 bp chimeric RNA predicted by the consensus fusion junction sequence is consistent with a read-through transcription of the 5'-gene NSFP1-Pseudo gene NSFP1 (NSFtruncation at exon 12/13) followed by trans-splicing to connect withLRRC37A2 located immediately 3' through exon 1/2. A total of 15 different 8-mer neoantigen peptides discovered from the NSFP1 and LRRC37A2 truncations were predicted to bind to a total of 35 unique MHC class I alleles with a binding affinity of IC50<500nM.); 1 of which elicited a robust immune response.

Conclusion

Our data provides a framework to identify immunogenic neoantigen candidates from fusion transcripts and suggests a potential vaccine strategy to target the immunogenic neopeptides in patients with tumors carrying the NSFP1-LRRC37A2 fusion.

Abstract OT3-19-01: Phase II Study of Screening Brain MRIs in Stage IV Breast Cancer

Background: As systemic therapy improves, there has been an increasing number of breast cancer patients who develop brain metastasis. Screening of asymptomatic stage IV breast cancer patients with brain MRIs is not currently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines. Retrospective reports suggest breast cancer patients are more likely to present with more advanced central nervous system disease at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis compared to melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This may be in part due to routine screening recommendations in melanoma and NSCLC. Early detection and treatment of brain metastases may improve outcomes for breast cancer patients. Trial Design: The study is designed as a single arm, nonrandomized phase II study, with the goal of investigating the role of screening brain MRIs in neurologically asymptomatic patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast cancer patients will be allocated based on receptor subtypes into triple negative (TN), HER2+, and hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- breast cancer. Following study enrollment, patients will undergo a screening brain MRI. Patients will undergo a second brain MRI at first systemic progression or at 6 months whichever event occurs sooner. Eligibility: Asymptomatic, stage IV breast cancer patients that have progressed past first line therapy in the metastatic setting with an ECOG/= 6 months are eligible. Specific Aims: The primary objective is to determine the incidence of asymptomatic brain metastasis in metastatic breast cancer by subtype. Secondary objectives include determining the incidence of asymptomatic leptomeningeal disease, the number and size of brain metastases at diagnosis, the number of patients requiring whole brain radiation therapy vs. stereotactic radiation following diagnosis and overall survival and brain metastasis specific survival following brain metastasis diagnosis in metastatic breast cancer by subtype. Statistical Methods: A total of 30, 30, and 40 TN, HER2+, and HR+/HER2-, breast cancer patients will be enrolled, respectively. Using an incidence rate of 17%, the 95% CI by subtype will be (0.06,0.351), (0.06,0.351), and (0.07,0.322). Patient Accrual: This study is open with 30 patients enrolled at the time of submission. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled. Contact Information: Kamran A. Ahmed MD, Moffitt Cancer Center, email: kamran.ahmed@moffitt.org, Clinical trial information: NCT05115474. Funding: Florida Breast Cancer Foundation.

Citation Format: Kamran A. Ahmed, Youngchul Kim, Avan Armaghani, John Arrington, Ricardo Costa, Brian J. Czerniecki, Roberto Diaz, Peter A. Forsyth, Hung Khong, Kimberley Lee, Loretta Loftus, Marilin Rosa, Hatem H. Soliman, Iman Washington, Aixa Soyano, Hyo S. Han. Phase II Study of Screening Brain MRIs in Stage IV Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-19-01.

Abstract P1-04-06: Characterization of recurrence risk after lumpectomy and radiotherapy in HER2-positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, using 7-gene predictive biosignature: Implications for the NSABP-B43 trial results

Background: HER2-positive versus HER2-negative ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been associated with an increased risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT). In recognition of this, the NASBP-B43 trial was designed to determine if two doses of trastuzumab would improve local control with BCS plus RT in HER2-positive DCIS. The trial demonstrated a non-statistically significant advantage with the addition of trastuzumab in reducing ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR). The predictive 7-gene DCIS biosignature, DCISionRT with Residual Risk Subtype (PreludeDxTM, Laguna Hills, CA) has been shown to classify DCIS patients into two distinct groups of patients with substantially different rates of IBR following BCS plus RT. Based upon these differences in outcome, we assessed the IBR rate in patients with HER2(+) DCIS treated with BCS and RT who were or were not in the Residual Risk Subtype group defined using DCISionRT, while accounting for the varying clinicopathologic profile of the patients.

Materials & Methods: DCISionRT was evaluated in a subset of 178 women with HER2(+) DCIS treated with BCS and RT as part of a multinational cohort of 926 patients from the United States, Sweden, and Australia, who were used in the validation studies for DCISionRT. Central pathology review and biosignature testing were performed at a CLIA-certified lab (Laguna Hills, CA). HER2(+) DCIS was defined as patients with a HER2(3+) immunohistochemistry &gt;10% per ASCO/CAP guidelines. The IBR rate was calculated for the overall group of HER2(+) patients and those in the Residual Risk group. Individual patient outcome and biosignature results were analyzed using Kaplan Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard analyses.

Results: The biosignature classified 113 of the 178 (63%) HER2(+) women into the Residual Risk group (DS&gt;2.8 with RRt). Patients in the Residual Risk group had a significantly greater IBR (HR=8.3; 95%CI: 1.1,50, p=.012) over 10-years, with a corresponding 10-year total IBR rate of 16.2% (95%CI: 9.7%, 26.5%) versus 1.6% (95%CI: 0.2%, 10.9%) for all other HER2(+) patients. In univariate analysis, younger patients tended to have higher IBR rate after BCS plus RT, but only Residual Risk was significantly associated with IBR rate after BCS plus RT. Moreover, multivariable analysis demonstrated that the Residual Risk group was eight times more likely to recur after BCS and RT, while clinicopathologic factors (age, grade, tumor size) were not associated with higher IBR rates.

Conclusion: The DCISionRT Residual Risk group was predictive for 10-year IBR risk after BCS plus RT in women with HER2(+) DCIS. Approximately 40% of patients with HER2(+) DCIS would be expected to achieve low rates of recurrence with BCS and RT, while about 60% of these women (classified in the Residual Risk group) would have higher recurrence rates and may benefit from further therapy, such as HER2-directed therapies. These findings suggest that if the results of the B43 trial were re-analyzed using the predictive 7-gene biosignature (DCISionRT with Residual Risk Subtype), better clarity could be gained on the true impact of trastuzumab on IBR rates in patients with HER2(+) DCIS and the patients most likely to benefit from this additional therapy.

Table 1. Univariate and Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Analyses.

Citation Format: Frank Vicini, Chirag Shah, Rachel Rabinovitch, Pat Whitworth, Julie A. Margenthaler, Brian J. Czerniecki, DAVID J. DABBS, Sheila Weinmann, Michael Leo, G Bruce Mann, Fredrik Wärnberg, jess Savala, Steven C. Shivers, Karuna Mittal, Troy Bremer. Characterization of recurrence risk after lumpectomy and radiotherapy in HER2-positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, using 7-gene predictive biosignature: Implications for the NSABP-B43 trial results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-06.

Abstract P1-05-29: Breast cancer laterality: Is age a factor?

BACKGROUND: Studies have consistently demonstrated that breast cancers arise in the left breast more often than the right breast, but no factors have been able to account for this. Some studies have shown age younger than 45 years and late age at menarche to be associated with somewhat higher incidence of cancer in the right breast. However, most of these studies were conducted in the 1990s. We sought to determine if demographic factors, pathologic findings, or treatment impact laterality. METHODS: We performed a single-institution IRB-approved retrospective chart review of US female breast cancer patients diagnosed with DCIS (stage 0) or stages I-III breast cancer from 1997 to April 2020. Clinicopathologic characteristics, demographic, and treatment information were collected. Statistical analyses evaluated differences in laterality. Association between laterality and continuous variables was determined using Kruskal-Wallis test. Association of laterality and categorical variables was determined using Chi-square test or Fisher exact test if applicable. RESULTS: 5328 female patients with 5474 breast cancers were evaluated with a median age of 60 years old. Majority of tumors were stage T1(2542, 54.4%) and 75% were IDC. Overall left-sided cancer showed a predominance (2797, 51.1%). Breast cancer laterality was not significantly associated with grade, receptor status, tumor size, pathologic type, or recurrent tumors. Laterality was evaluated regarding age, based on age less than 61 years old versus greater than or equal to age 61. Laterality was significantly associated with age overall with an increase in left-sided breast cancers (2797 vs 2677, p=0.029). Left-sided breast cancer was significantly increased in women greater than or equal to age 61, 1456 (53%) vs right-sided 1290 (47%). Whereas, right-sided breast cancer was significantly associated with age less than 61, (1387, 50.8% vs left 1341, 49.2%, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Our analysis confirms prior studies that overall left-sided breast cancer is more common in women. However, there are age differences with left-sided breast cancers more prevalent in older age women greater than or equal to age 61. On the other hand, right-sided breast cancer was seen more often in women under the age of 61. Further studies are needed to better ascertain why the overall laterality of breast cancer occurs more frequently in the left breast, but also to determine an explanation for the laterality age differences. Anatomical factors such as blood supply, breast size, inherited genetic mutations, tumor genomics, lactation history and others are possible factors that need to be further explored. Studies are ongoing. This information will be potentially helpful in allocating diagnostic and therapeutic resources for breast cancer patients.

Citation Format: Kelly Elleson, Gerald H. Sokol, Weihong Sun, Junmin Whiting, Marie C. Lee, Brian J. Czerniecki, Loretta Loftus. Breast cancer laterality: Is age a factor? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-29.

Abstract PD7-06: Characteristics of Long-Term Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis after Stereotactic Radiation

Background: Advances in imaging and systemic therapy have improved the survival for patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). However, an improved understanding of patients with long-term survival after stereotactic radiation (SRT) for BCBM is warranted and could allow for better prognostication and personalized treatment. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective review of 188 patients who underwent SRT sessions to 685 BCBM from August 2004 to June 2020. Patients who were lost to follow up within 2 years after SRT were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those with overall survival (OS) from SRT less than 2 years (short-term survival, STS) and those with OS from SRT of at least 2 years (long-term survival, LTS). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared between the 2 groups via the student t-test and Chi-square testing as appropriate. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to calculate OS, local control (LC), and distant intracranial control (DIC) from the date of SRT. The reverse KM method was used to estimate follow-up from SRT. Results: The median follow up from BCBM diagnosis was 52.8 months (95% CI: 40.5-75.2 months). Of the 685 treated BCBMs, 552 (81%) received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to a median dose of 21 Gy (12-24 Gy) and 133 received fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) to a median dose of 25 Gy (20-35 Gy) in 3-5 fractions. The 2-year LC, DIC, and OS was 78.4%, 26.5%, and 38.3%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 19%. There were 72 patients (38%) in the LTS group and 116 patients (62%) in the STS group. The LTS group had lower rates of invasive lobular carcinoma (0% vs 6%, p=0.001) and higher rate of HER2+ disease (61% vs 30%, p&lt; 0.001). The LTS group had lower rates of concurrent extracranial metastasis (74% vs 89%, p=0.008) and lung metastasis (33% vs 53%, p=0.009), though there were no differences in the rates of bone or liver metastasis. The LTS group had less BCBM at the time of SRT (mean 1.9 vs 2.5, p=0.013) and more often received SRT to a single BCBM (65% vs 42%, p=0.002). There were no significant differences in age or performance status between the groups. Conclusion: Prognosis for patients with BCBM is heterogeneous, as a minority of patients have prolonged OS after SRT. These patients more often have limited BCBM, HER2+ disease, and a lower extracranial disease burden.

Citation Format: Joseph D. Tang, Matthew N. Mills, Chetna Thawani, Daniel E. Oliver, Aixa Soyano, Arnold Etame, Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu, Nam Tran, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Peter A. Forsyth, Brian J. Czerniecki, Hatem H. Soliman, Hyo S. Han, Kamran A. Ahmed. Characteristics of Long-Term Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis after Stereotactic Radiation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-06.

Effect of Microporous Polysaccharide Particles in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Microporous polysaccharide particles (MPP, proprietary name "Arista AH"), derived from purified plant starch, are used to augment hemostasis at surgery. The effect of MPP regarding short-term complications after mastectomy remains an area of ongoing investigation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy without reconstruction from January 2019 to 2021 was performed. Primary endpoints included antibiotic prescription, seroma or abscess drainage, readmission, wound dehiscence, and time to drain removal within 30 days of initial surgery. Wilcoxon rank sum test or Student t test was used for group comparisons for continuous variables; Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the associations among categorical variables.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety patients were included; 119 received MPP and 71 did not. There was no difference in antibiotic prescription, infection drainage, hematoma, readmission, dehiscence, or time to drain removal with regards to MPP use. MPP treated patients were older (65.8 years vs. 59.1, P < .001) and had lower albumin levels (4.1 g/dL vs. 4.3, P = .025). Patients who underwent abscess drainage had higher body mass index ( mean 36.1 vs. 30.1 P = .036). Patients requiring seroma drainage were more likely to be diabetic (12.8% vs. 4%, P = .035) and to have been treated with lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA, 15.6% vs. 3.8%, P = .009). Patients who had LVA were significantly less likely to receive MPP when compared to other groups (3.1% vs. 74.7% P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Consider utilizing MPP in patients at higher risk of seroma, such as those undergoing axillary surgery including LVA.

Long-Term CD4+ T-Cell and Immunoglobulin G Immune Responses in Oncology Workers following COVID-19 Vaccination: An Interim Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

We conducted a prospective study to evaluate immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in oncology workers in which we collected blood and clinical data every 6 months. Spike-specific CD4+ T-cells and immunoglobulin G responses were measured using interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Sixty (81%) vaccinated and 14 (19%) unvaccinated individuals were enrolled. CD4+ T-cell responses of those individuals currently naturally infected were comparable to those who were 6 months from receiving their last dose of the vaccine; both responses were significantly higher than among those who were unvaccinated. Unvaccinated participants who became vaccinated while in the study showed a significant increase in both types of spike-specific immune responses. Previously vaccinated individuals who received a third dose (booster) showed a similar response to the spike protein. However, this response decreases as soon as 3 months but does not dip below the established response following two doses. Response to variants of concern B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) also increased, with the Omicron variant having a significantly lower response when compared to Delta and the wild type. We conclude that antibody and T-cell responses increase in oncology workers after serial vaccination but can wane over time.

A Real-World Data Retrospective Cohort Study of Low Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Natural History and Treatment Outcomes

Purpose

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease, and there is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal cut point for clinically relevant ER expression. We used a real-world database to assess the prognostic and predictive values of lower ER expression levels on treatment outcomes with endocrine therapy.

Methods

We used a nationwide electronic health record database. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the association between ER expression, tumor characteristics, and treatment patterns among patients with early-stage BC. We used Kaplan–Meier survival curves to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). We assessed associations between an alternative ER expression-level cut point and clinical outcomes.

Results

Among 4697 patients with early-stage HER2-negative BC, 83 (2.04%) had ER⁺-low BC (ER expression, 1–9.99%) and 36 (0.88%) had ER⁺-intermediate BC (10–19.9%). ER⁺-low tumors were associated with higher tumor grade, larger size, and higher axillary tumor burden than ER⁺-high tumors (≥20% ER expression). African Americans had a higher prevalence of both triple-negative BC (TNBC) and ER⁺-low BC than ER⁺-high BC. Patients with ER⁺-low and ER⁺-intermediate tumors had survival outcomes similar to patients with TNBC and worse survival outcomes than patients with ER⁺-high tumors (P < 0.001). Tumors with <20% ER expression were associated with worse outcomes.

Conclusion

In our cohort, patients with BCs with ER expression levels <20% had poor clinical outcomes similar to those of patients with TNBC.

Intratumoral delivery of dendritic cells plus anti-HER2 therapy triggers both robust systemic antitumor immunity and complete regression in HER2 mammary carcinoma

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted antibodies in combination with chemotherapy has improved outcomes of HER2 positive (pos) breast cancer (BC) but toxicity of therapy remains a problem. High levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with increased pathologic complete responses for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Here we sought to investigate whether delivery of intratumoral (i.t.) multiepitope major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II HER2 peptides-pulsed type I polarized dendritic cells (HER2-DC1) in combination with anti-HER2 antibodies without chemotherapy could enhance tumor regression by increasing anti-HER2 lymphocyte infiltration into the tumor.

Methods

BALB/c mice bearing orthotopic TUBO tumors, BALB/c mice bearing subcutaneous (s.c.) CT26 hHER2 tumors, or BALB-HER2/neu transgenic mice were all treated with i.t. or s.c. HER2-DC1, anti-HER2 antibodies, paclitaxel, T-DM1 or in combination. Immune response, host immune cells and effector function were analyzed using flow cytometry, interferon-γ ELISA and cytokine/chemokine arrays. The contributions of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) were assessed using depleting antibodies and FcγR KO mice. Molecular changes were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and western blot.

Results

HER2-DC1 combined with anti-HER2 antibodies delivered i.t. compared to s.c. induced complete tumor regression in 75–80% of treated mice, with increased tumor infiltrating CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T, B, natural killer T cells (NKT) and natural killer cells, and strong anti-HER2 responses in all HER2^pos BC models tested. The therapy caused regression of untreated distant tumors. Labeled HER2-DC1 migrated prominently into the distant tumor and induced infiltration of various DC subsets into tumors. HER2-DC1 i.t. combined with anti-HER2 antibodies displayed superior antitumor response compared to standard chemotherapy with anti-HER2 antibodies. Lasting immunity was attained which prevented secondary tumor formation. The presence of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and ADCC were required for complete tumor regression. In the HER2^pos BC models, HER2-DC1 i.t. combined with anti-HER2 antibodies effectively diminished activation of HER2-mediated oncogenic signaling pathways.

Conclusions

HER2-DC1 i.t. with anti-HER2 antibodies mediates tumor regression through combined activation of T and B cell compartments and provides evidence that HER2-DC1 i.t. in combination with anti-HER2 antibodies can be tested as an effective alternative therapeutic strategy to current chemotherapy and anti-HER2 antibodies in HER2^pos BC.

Assessing the benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients following breast-conserving surgery with or without radiation stratified by a 7-gene predictive DCIS biosignature

502

Background: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) has been the mainstay for DCIS treatment. Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) has often been recommended based on multiple randomized clinical trials (RCT). However, these studies have failed to identify subsets of patients who did or did not benefit from adjuvant RT/ET therapy after BCS. We evaluated the association of a 7-gene predictive DCIS biosignature (PreludeDx, Laguna Hills, CA) to assess the impact of ET on 10-yr ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) risk after BCS alone or with RT. Methods: DCISionRT with integrated Residual Risk subtype (RRt) reported a decision score (DS) and three risk groups, a) Low Risk (DS≤2.8), b) Elevated Risk (DS > 2.8 without RRt) and c) Residual Risk (DS > 2.8 with RRt). DCISionRT/RRt was evaluated in 926 patients from 4 cohorts who were treated with BCS alone or with RT/ET. The three risk groups were assessed for 10-yr total (invasive and in situ) IBR risk by Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival analysis. Results: DCISionRT/RRt classified 338 (37%) women as Low Risk, 399 (43%) as Elevated Risk, and 189 (20%) as Residual Risk. Overall, patients treated with ET had a significantly lower 10-yr IBR risk in multivariable analysis independent of RT (HR = 0.55, p = 0.033). In the Low Risk group treated with BCS without RT, the average 10-yr IBR risk was 5.6% (95% CI 2.5-12.1%, n = 124) and was not significantly different with vs without ET (p = 0.33). The 10-yr IBR risk after BCS alone was 22.6% in the Elevated Risk group and 50.3% in the Residual Risk group. Compared to BCS alone, the 10-year IBR risk tended to be lower in patients prescribed ET without RT in the Elevated (11.6%, 95% CI 3.9-32%) and Residual (15.4%, 95% CI 4.1-49%) Risk groups. 10-yr IBR risk was not significantly reduced by RT within the Low Risk group (p = 0.7) but was significantly reduced to 6.3% (95% CI 3.4-12%) by RT within the Elevated Risk (HR = 0.2, p < 0.001) and to 12.5% (95% CI 6.4-23%) within the Residual Risk (HR = 0.2, p < 0.001) groups. 10-yr IBR risk was significantly higher after RT in the Residual (HR = 2.5, p = 0.013) vs. Elevated Risk groups. After BCS and RT, there was no significant reduction in 10-yr IBR risk for those treated with vs without ET in the Elevated (p = 0.22) and Residual (p = 0.87) risk groups. Conclusions: The DCISionRT/RRt biosignature demonstrated prognostic and predictive RT response in Elevated and Residual Risk patients. Consistent with prior RCT data, ET was associated with lower 10-yr IBR risk overall, and within the DCISionRT Elevated and Residual Risk groups without RT. However, neither ET nor RT were asssociated with significant risk reduction in the Low Risk group. There was no added benefit of ET in the Elevated and Residual Risk groups after BCS+RT; the Residual Risk group patients still had a high IBR risk after RT.

Abstract OT2-09-01: Phase I/II study of stereotactic radiation and abemaciclib in the management of hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer brain metastases

Background: Breast cancer patients with brain metastases have a high unmet clinical need and improved management strategies are needed. There has been interest in studying CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the management of breast cancer brain metastases. A phase II study has shown abemaciclib to have activity in the management of hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- brain metastases. Pre-clinical data suggests a potential synergy with CDK inhibitors and radiation therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone in the management of limited brain metastases. We hypothesize treatment with abemaciclib and SRS will be safe and improve intracranial progression free survival (PFS) compared to abemaciclib alone. Trial Design: The study is designed as a prospective, single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, phase I/II trial of abemaciclib and endocrine therapy with SRS among patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer brain metastases. Treatment will be initiated with one week of abemaciclib followed by stereotactic radiation to sites of brain metastases or post-operative cavities with continued abemaciclib. Safety will be monitored initially by a 3+3 design. If unexpected neurologic toxicities are noted, the dose of radiation therapy will be reduced. This will be followed by a phase II study to evaluate intracranial PFS. Eligibility: Eligible patients include those that are HR+/HER2-, ≥18, ECOG ≤2 with ≤15 breast cancer brain metastases with measurable disease per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. Specific Aims: The primary objective of the phase I study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of abemaciclib and SRS to sites of brain metastases in the management of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases. The primary objective of the phase II portion is to determine PFS intracranially. Secondary objectives include evaluation of extracranial PFS, local and distant intracranial control, and overall survival. Statistical Methods: Safety and feasibility will be monitored in the phase I study using a 3 + 3 design followed by a phase II study to assess intracranial PFS. The phase II study is designed as a single-arm, two-stage trial using the Restricted-Kwak-and-Jung’s method. In the first stage, a total of 21 patients will be enrolled. If pre-specified endpoints are met, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled in the second stage. Patient Accrual: A total of up to 31 patients will be enrolled inclusive of patients in the phase I portion treated at the recommended phase II dose. Clinical trial information: NCT04923542.

Citation Format: Kamran A. Ahmed, Youngchul Kim, Michelle DeJesus, Sasha J. Beyer, Nicole O. Williams, Joshua Palmer, Kristina D. Woodhouse, Rashmi K. Murthy, Jing Li, Avan J. Armaghani, John A. Arrington, Ricardo L. Costa, Brian J. Czerniecki, Arnold B. Etame, Peter A. Forsyth, Hung T. Khong, Daniel E. Oliver, Marilin Rosa, Solmaz Sahebjam, Hatem H. Soliman, Aixa E. Soyano, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Michael Yu, Hyo S. Han. Phase I/II study of stereotactic radiation and abemaciclib in the management of hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-09-01.

Identification of Immunogenic MHC Class II Human HER3 Peptides that Mediate Anti-HER3 CD4+ Th1 Responses and Potential Use as a Cancer Vaccine

The HER3/ERBB3 receptor is an oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase that forms heterodimers with EGFR family members and is overexpressed in numerous cancers. HER3 overexpression associates with reduced survival and acquired resistance to targeted therapies, making it a potential therapeutic target in multiple cancer types. Here, we report on immunogenic, promiscuous MHC class II-binding HER3 peptides, which can generate HER3-specific CD4⁺ Th1 antitumor immune responses. Using an overlapping peptide screening methodology, we identified nine MHC class II-binding HER3 epitopes that elicited specific Th1 immune response in both healthy donors and breast cancer patients. Most of these peptides were not identified by current binding algorithms. Homology assessment of amino acid sequence BLAST showed >90% sequence similarity between human and murine HER3/ERBB3 peptide sequences. HER3 peptide-pulsed dendritic cell vaccination resulted in anti-HER3 CD4⁺ Th1 responses that prevented tumor development, significantly delayed tumor growth in prevention models, and caused regression in multiple therapeutic models of HER3-expressing murine tumors, including mammary carcinoma and melanoma. Tumors were robustly infiltrated with CD4⁺ T cells, suggesting their key role in tumor rejection. Our data demonstrate that class II HER3 promiscuous peptides are effective at inducing HER3-specific CD4⁺ Th1 responses and suggest their applicability in immunotherapies for human HER3-overexpressing tumors.

Intercepting Premalignant, Preinvasive Breast Lesions Through Vaccination

Breast cancer (BC) prevention remains the ultimate cost-effective method to reduce the global burden of invasive breast cancer (IBC). To date, surgery and chemoprevention remain the main risk-reducing modalities for those with hereditary cancer syndromes, as well as high-risk non-hereditary breast lesions such as ADH, ALH, or LCIS. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a preinvasive malignant lesion of the breast that closely mirrors IBC and, if left untreated, develops into IBC in up to 50% of lesions. Certain high-risk patients with DCIS may have a 25% risk of developing recurrent DCIS or IBC, even after surgical resection. The development of breast cancer elicits a strong immune response, which brings to prominence the numerous advantages associated with immune-based cancer prevention over drug-based chemoprevention, supported by the success of dendritic cell vaccines targeting HER2-expressing BC. Vaccination against BC to prevent or interrupt the process of BC development remains elusive but is a viable option. Vaccination to intercept preinvasive or premalignant breast conditions may be possible by interrupting the expression pattern of various oncodrivers. Growth factors may also function as potential immune targets to prevent breast cancer progression. Furthermore, neoantigens also serve as effective targets for interception by virtue of strong immunogenicity. It is noteworthy that the immune response also needs to be strong enough to result in target lesion elimination to avoid immunoediting as it may occur in IBC arising from DCIS. Overall, if the issue of vaccine targets can be solved by interrupting premalignant lesions, there is a potential to prevent the development of IBC.

Real-world benefit of combination palbociclib and endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer and correlation with neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Combination CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy has been shown to significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the real-world benefit of first-line combination therapy in this cohort and to correlate treatment efficacy with neutropenia, a common toxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitors.

METHODS

This study included HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or mBC patients who were treated with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy, mainly letrozole, between 1 January 2015 and 1 March 2018. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The predictive value of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for PFS were explored using Cox regression models. Both ANC and NLR were used as a time-dependent variable.

RESULTS

In total, 165 patients were included with median PFS of 24.19 months (95% CI 18.93-NR). Median PFS for patients with bone-only metastases (n = 54) was not reached (95% CI 18.21-NR). Among patients with all other metastases (n = 111), median PFS was 24.19 months (95% CI 16.33-33.82). Lower ANC was correlated with decreased risk of progression (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.97, p = 0.008). There was no significant association between NLR and the risk of disease progression (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97-1.18, p = 0.203).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of palbociclib and endocrine therapy in the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative mBC in the real-world setting is similar to the efficacy reported in the PALOMA-2 trial. Patients with lower neutrophil count may have a lower risk of early disease progression.

Nivolumab and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients With Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Nonrandomized, Open-Label Phase 1b Study

Purpose

Methods and Materials

Results

Conclusions

The presentation of brain metastases in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and breast cancer and potential implications for screening brain MRIs

PURPOSE

This study assessed the presentation and institutional outcomes treating brain metastases (BM) of breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and melanoma origin.

METHODS

Patients with brain metastases treated between 2014 and 2019 with primary melanoma, NSCLC, and BC were identified. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from dates of initial BM diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 959 patients were identified including melanoma (31%), NSCLC (51%), and BC (18%). Patients with BC were younger at BM diagnosis (median age: 57) than NSCLC (65) and melanoma patients (62, p < 0.0001). Breast cancer patients were more likely to present with at least 5 BM (27%) than NSCLC (14%) and melanoma (13%), leptomeningeal disease (23%, 6%, and 6%, p = 0.0004) and receive whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (58%, 37%, and 22%, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in surgical resection (24%, 24%, and 29%, p = 0.166). Median OS was shorter for BC patients (9.9, 10.3, and 13.7 months, p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer patients were more likely to be younger, present with advanced disease, require WBRT, and have poorer OS than NSCLC and melanoma patients. Further investigation is needed to determine which BC patients are at sufficient risk for brain MRI screening.

Breast cancer ER, PR, and HER2 expression variance by germline cancer predisposition genes

10526

Background: The association between breast cancer characteristics and survival with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression has been primarily studied via binomial categories, ER-positive and ER-negative. In order to better characterize germline genetic influences on these markers, we investigated their IHC expression semi-quantitatively in cancer predisposition germline pathogenic variant (PV) carriers of the following genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, PTEN, CDH1, ATM, CHEK2, and Lynch syndrome genes. The HER2 expression was also analyzed. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with germline panel genetic testing for cancer predisposition genes at Moffitt Cancer Center’s GeneHome clinic. Inclusion criteria included 1) women ≥18 years old, 2) breast cancer diagnosis, 3) cancer predisposition germline panel genetic test results, 4) available ER and PR expression levels, and 5) available HER expression and/or amplification status. ER, PR, and HER2 status were compared between PV carriers and non-PV carriers via Mann-Whitney U at p>0.05. Results: A total of 847 cases were reviewed for the study. Among 658 patients with a breast cancer diagnosis and complete ER PR data, 365 cases (55.5%) were non-PV carriers and 293 cases (44.5%) carried a PV in at least one of the genes listed above. Among 635 cases with available HER2 expression/amplification status, 355 (55.9%) cases were non-PV carriers and 288 (45.4%) cases were PV-carriers. When compared with non-PV carrier controls, BRCA1 PV carriers’ breast tumors had significantly lower ER and/or PR expression. Further, BRCA2 and TP53 PV tumors also displayed moderately lower ER expression. Contrarily, CHEK2 tumors displayed higher ER and PR expression compared to controls. Further, BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers were more likely to have HER2- breast cancers. Conclusions: Differences in ER, PR, HER2 expression levels were observed in germline PV carrier breast cancers, signaling differential impacts by germline PVs on the tumor evolution process. It is likely that tumor differences in PV carriers influence responses to therapies, including hormone therapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and subsequent survival.[Table: see text]

Retrospective cohort study of estrogen receptor low positive early breast cancer using real world data

525

Background: Estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease, with ongoing debate on the optimal cut off point for clinically relevant ER expression. Tumors harboring ≤10% ER expression are associated with poor outcomes. We used a real-world database to assess prognostic and predictive value of an alternative ER expression cut points. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database. During the study period, the de-identified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (̃800 sites of care). We evaluated the association between ER expression (assessed locally by immunohistochemistry according to ASCO/CAP guidelines) with tumor characteristics, and treatment patterns of patients with early-stage BC (stage I-III) using descriptive statistics. Recurrence free survival and overall survival was defined as time in months from date of surgery until the data of documented cancer recurrence or death respectively. We used Kaplan Myer survival curves to calculate recurrence free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with ER low, ER intermediate and ER high tumors. To define an alternative ER expression cut point, the data set was divided into 2/3 training and 1/3 test data. A cut point analysis was performed on the training data set to find the optimum cut point of ER+ staining based on correlation with recurrence free survival as the outcome. Results: Among 4,697 ER positive early-stage BC patients, 83 (1.8%) had ER low (ER expression :1-10%) and 36 (0.8%) had ER intermediate BC (11-20%). Median follow up time was 63 months (range 24-84). ER low tumors were associated with higher tumor grade, larger size, and higher axillary tumor burden compared to ER high positive tumors ( > 20% ER expression). African American patients had a higher prevalence of both triple negative and ER low positive BCs compared to ER high tumors- 21%, 22%, and 8% respectively. No significant differences in patient- or tumor-associated characteristics were observed between Low ER and intermediate-ER positive BC patients. Both ER low and intermediate positive tumor patients had survival outcomes similar to patients with TNBC and worse than ER high positive tumors (p < 0.001). No significant correlations between endocrine therapy and RFS or OS were observed among patients with either ER low or intermediate BCs (HR 1.47 and 2.57, p > 0.05; respectively). Sensitivity analysis showed that tumors with ≤ 20% ER expression were associated with worse RFS in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings suggest that patients with ER expression rates ≤ 20% have poor outcomes and derive minimal benefit from endocrine therapies.

Presentation and management of patients with brain metastases of primary melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and breast cancer origin

2033

Background: As systemic therapy improves; the prevalence of brain metastases is increasing. Screening brain MRIs are currently recommended for all stage ≥ II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and stage IIIB–IV melanoma patients, but only when neurologic symptoms arise in stage IV or recurrent breast cancer (BC) patients. This study assessed the presentation and institutional outcomes treating brain metastases (BM) of BC, NSCLC, and melanoma origin. Methods: Patients with BM treated between 2014 and 2019 with primary melanoma, NSCLC, and BC were identified. Characteristics of initial BM diagnoses were retrieved from clinical chart review. Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson’s chi-square tests were used to test differences between groups. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from dates of initial BM diagnosis using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 959 patients were identified (BC 18%, NSCLC 51%, melanoma 31%). BC patients were younger at initial presentation (BC median age: 57, NSCLC 65, melanoma 62, p< 0.0001). At BM diagnosis, BC patients were more likely to have concurrent systemic metastasis (BC 77%, NSCLC 42%, melanoma 69%, p< 0.0001), at least 5 BM (BC 27%, NSCLC 14%, melanoma 13%, p= 0.0004), and leptomeningeal disease (BC 23%, NSCLC 6%, melanoma 6%, p< 0.0001). Patients with BC were significantly more likely to receive whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (BC 58%, NSCLC 37%, melanoma 22%, p< 0.0001) and less likely to receive stereotactic radiation (BC 26%, NSCLC 48%, melanoma 58%, p< 0.0001) following initial BM diagnosis. There were no significant differences in surgical resection between cancer types (BC 24%, NSCLC 24%, melanoma 29%, p =0.166). Median OS was shorter for BC (BC 9.9 months, NSCLC 10.3 months, melanoma 13.7 months, p= 0.0006) following BM diagnosis. Conclusions: Our institutional analysis found BC patients were more likely to be younger, present with more advanced brain disease, require WBRT, and have poorer OS than NSCLC and melanoma patients following initial brain metastasis diagnosis. This may be due in part to a lack of brain MRI screening recommendations in BC. Further investigation is needed to determine which BC patients are at sufficient risk to warrant brain MRI screening.

A phase 2 trial of talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer

578

Background: TVEC is a modified oncolytic herpes simplex 1 (HSV1) virus currently FDA approved for the treatment of unresectable cutaneous and nodal melanoma. TVEC is designed to preferentially lyse tumor cells over normal tissue to release tumor associated antigens, produces GM-CSF to activate dendritic cells, and stimulates T cells to infiltrate the tumor (TILs). TILs in breast cancer are associated with better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), so we hypothesized that intratumoral TVEC may enhance response to NAC. We report results of a phase 2 trial combining NAC with TVEC in stage 2-3 TNBC. Methods: Stage II-III TNBC pts (N = 37) were to be enrolled into a single arm, optimal Simon 2 stage phase 2 trial with TVEC (10^6 PFU 1st dose then 10^8 PFU x 4 doses) weeks 1,4,6,8,10 + weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) IV x 12, followed by dose dense AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide 60/600 mg/m2) IV q2weeks x 4 alone given preoperatively. Primary endpoint was residual cancer burden 0 rate (RCB0). Trial meets primary endpoint with ≥15 RCB0 responses out of 37 evaluable pts, assuming p1 = 45% vs. p0 = 30% with one sided type I error rate at 0.10 and power at 70%. Results: Forty pts were enrolled at Moffitt (5/2018 – 4/2020) and evaluable for safety with 3 pts non-evaluable for efficacy due to incomplete treatment. Study demographics: median age 49 (27-66), 67.5% White, 10% Black, 15% Hispanic, clinical stage II 83% and III 17%, node + 42%. The RCB0 rate = 16/37 (43%, 95% CI 27-61%) and additional 9 pts with RCB-1 (RCB0/1 rate 68%, 95% CI 50-82%). Toxicities did not differ significantly from expected NAC toxicities except for increased brief G1-2 fevers, chills, injection site pains. Four pts had G2-3 thromboembolic events (10%) slightly greater than expected 6% rate on NAC. Conclusions: Addition of TVEC to NAC increased RCB0 rates with manageable toxicities and warrants additional investigation in TNBC. Immune correlates and updated survival data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02779855.

Capecitabine and stereotactic radiation in the management of breast cancer brain metastases

Background

Little is known about the safety and efficacy of concurrent capecitabine and stereotactic radiotherapy in the setting of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

Methods

Twenty-three patients with BCBM underwent 31 stereotactic sessions to 90 lesions from 2005 to 2019 with receipt of capecitabine. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant intracranial control (DIC) from the date of stereotactic radiation. Imaging was independently reviewed by a neuro-radiologist.

Results

Median follow-up from stereotactic radiation was 9.2 months. Receptor types of patients treated included triple negative (n = 7), hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- (n = 7), HR+/HER2+ (n = 6), and HR−/HER2+ (n = 3). Fourteen patients had stage IV disease prior to BCBM diagnosis. The median number of brain metastases treated per patient was 3 (1 to 12). The median dose of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was 21 Gy (range: 15–24 Gy) treated in a single fraction and for lesions treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) 25 Gy (24–30 Gy) in a median of 5 fractions (range: 3–5). Of the 31 stereotactic sessions, 71% occurred within 1 month of capecitabine. No increased toxicity was noted in our series with no cases of radionecrosis. The 1-year OS, LC, and DIC were 46, 88, and 30%, respectively.

Conclusions

In our single institution experience, we demonstrate stereotactic radiation and capecitabine to be a safe treatment for patients with BCBM with adequate LC. Further study is needed to determine the potential synergy between stereotactic radiation and capecitabine in the management of BCBM.

Differentiation and Regulation of TH Cells: A Balancing Act for Cancer Immunotherapy

Current success of immunotherapy in cancer has drawn attention to the subsets of T_H cells in the tumor which are critical for activation of anti-tumor response either directly by themselves or by stimulating cytotoxic T cell activity. However, presence of immunosuppressive pro-tumorigenic T_H subsets in the tumor milieu further contributes to the complexity of regulation of T_H cell-mediated immune response. In this review, we present an overview of the multifaceted positive and negative effects of T_H cells, with an emphasis on regulation of different T_H cell subtypes by various immune cells, and how a delicate balance of contradictory signals can influence overall success of cancer immunotherapy. We focus on the regulatory network that encompasses dendritic cell-induced activation of CD4⁺ T_H1 cells and subsequent priming of CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells, along with intersecting anti-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic T_H2 cell activity. We further discuss how other tumor infiltrating immune cells such as immunostimulatory T_H9 and T_fh cells, immunosuppressive T_reg cells, and the duality of T_H17 function contribute to tip the balance of anti- vs pro-tumorigenic T_H responses in the tumor. We highlight the developing knowledge of CD4⁺ T_H1 immune response against neoantigens/oncodrivers, impact of current immunotherapy strategies on CD4⁺ T_H1 immunity, and how opposing action of T_H cell subtypes can be explored further to amplify immunotherapy success in patients. Understanding the nuances of CD4⁺ T_H cells regulation and the molecular framework undergirding the balancing act between anti- vs pro-tumorigenic T_H subtypes is critical for rational designing of immunotherapies that can bypass therapeutic escape to maximize the potential of immunotherapy.

Novel evolutionary dynamics of small populations in breast cancer adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy

Disseminated cancer cells (DCCs) are detected in the circulation and bone marrow of up to 40% of breast cancer (BC) patients with clinically localized disease. The formation of metastases is governed by eco-evolutionary interactions of DCCs with the tissue during the transition from microscopic populations to macroscopic disease. Here, we view BC adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in the context of small population extinction dynamics observed in the Anthropocene era. Specifically, the unique eco-evolutionary dynamics of small asexually reproducing cancer populations render them highly vulnerable to: (1) environmental and demographic fluctuations, (2) Allee effects, (3) genetic drift and (4) population fragmentation. Furthermore, these typically interact, producing self-reinforcing, destructive dynamics—termed the Extinction Vortex—eradicating the population even when none of the perturbations is individually capable of causing extinction. We propose that developing BC adjuvant and neoadjuvant protocols may exploit these dynamics to prevent recovery and proliferation of small cancer populations during and after treatment—termed “Eco-evolutionary rescue” in natural extinctions. We hypothesize more strategic application of currently available agents based on the extinction vulnerabilities of small populations could improve clinical outcomes.

Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) and stereotactic radiation in the management of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases

Background

Due to recent concerns about the toxicity of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with stereotactic radiation, we assessed our institutional outcomes treating HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) with T-DM1 and stereotactic radiation.

Methods

This is a single institution series of 16 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who underwent 18 stereotactic sessions to 40 BCBM from 2013 to 2019 with T-DM1 delivered within 6 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant intracranial control (DIC), and systemic progression-free survival (sPFS) from the date of SRS. A neuro-radiologist independently reviewed follow-up imaging.

Results

One patient had invasive lobular carcinoma, and 15 patients had invasive ductal carcinoma. All cases were HER2-positive, while 10 were hormone receptor (HR) positive. Twenty-four lesions were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to a median dose of 21 Gy (14–24 Gy). Sixteen lesions were treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation (FSRT) with a median dose of 25 Gy (20-30Gy) delivered in 3 to 5 fractions. Stereotactic radiation was delivered concurrently with T-DM1 in 19 lesions (48%). Median follow up time was 13.2 months from stereotactic radiation. The 1-year LC, DIC, sPFS, and OS were 75, 50, 30, and 67%, respectively. There was 1 case of leptomeningeal progression and 1 case (3%) of symptomatic radionecrosis.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that stereotactic radiation and T-DM1 is well-tolerated and effective for patients with HER2-positive BCBM. An increased risk for symptomatic radiation necrosis was not noted in our series.

Targeted Therapy Given after Anti-PD-1 Leads to Prolonged Responses in Mouse Melanoma Models through Sustained Antitumor Immunity

Immunotherapy (IT) and targeted therapy (TT) are both effective against melanoma, but their combination is frequently toxic. Here, we investigated whether the sequence of IT (anti-PD-1)→ TT (ceritinib-trametinib or dabrafenib-trametinib) was associated with improved antitumor responses in mouse models of BRAF- and NRAS-mutant melanoma. Mice with NRAS-mutant (SW1) or BRAF-mutant (SM1) mouse melanomas were treated with either IT, TT, or the sequence of IT→TT. Tumor volumes were measured, and samples from the NRAS-mutant melanomas were collected for immune-cell analysis, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), and reverse phase protein analysis (RPPA). scRNA-seq demonstrated that the IT→TT sequence modulated the immune environment, leading to increased infiltration of T cells, monocytes, dendritic cells and natural killer cells, and decreased numbers of tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells. Durable responses to the IT→TT sequence were dependent on T-cell activity, with depletion of CD8⁺, but not CD4⁺, T cells abrogating the therapeutic response. An analysis of transcriptional heterogeneity in the melanoma compartment showed the sequence of IT→TT enriched for a population of melanoma cells with increased expression of MHC class I and melanoma antigens. RPPA analysis demonstrated that the sustained immune response induced by IT→TT suppressed tumor-intrinsic signaling pathways required for therapeutic escape. These studies establish that upfront IT improves the responses to TT in BRAF- and NRAS-mutant melanoma models.

Disseminated cancer cells in breast cancer: Mechanism of dissemination and dormancy and emerging insights on therapeutic opportunities

Metastatic spread in breast cancer patients is the major driver of cancer-related deaths. A unique subset of cells disseminated from pre-invasive or primary tumor lesions are recognized as the main seeds for metastatic outgrowth. Disseminated cancer cells (DCCs) can migrate to distant organs and settle in a dormant state for a prolonged period until they emerge to overt metastases. Understanding the biology of breast cancer cells dissemination, dormancy and reactivation to form overt metastases has become an important focus. In this review, we discuss the recent advancements of molecular pathways involving breast cancer cell dissemination, role of chemokine-chemokine receptor networks in DCCs migration, DCCs phenotypic heterogeneity and unique genes signatures in tumor dormancy, microenvironmental regulation and specific niches that favors DCCs homing and dormancy. In addition, we also discuss recent findings relating to the role of immune response on DCC dissemination and dormancy. With recent advances in the field of immunotherapy/targeted therapy and its beneficial effects in cancer treatment, this review will focus on their impact on DCCs, reversal of stemness, tumor dormancy and metastatic relapse.

Abstract PS14-19: Characteristics of breast cancer brain metastases presentation by subtype and validation of the modified breast graded prognostic assessment

Purpose: Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) diagnosis is increasing in frequency due to improved systemic control and imaging techniques. Differences have been noted in rates of central nervous system (CNS) relapse and biologic subtype. The modified breast graded prognostic assessment (breast-GPA) was initially validated in patients treated between 1996-2013 and considers biologic subtype. In this study, we characterize patients diagnosed with BCBM by subtype and validate the breast-GPA in a modern cohort of patients.

Methods: All patients with BCBM treated at our institution with radiotherapy between 2016 and 2019 were identified. Characteristics of patients’ initial brain metastasis diagnosis were retrieved from the clinical chart and radiologic examinations. To test differences between cohorts, the Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson’s chi-square tests were used when appropriate. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of brain metastasis diagnosis to the date of death using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, with the log-rank test used to examine differences between groups.

Results: A total of 122 BCBM patients were identified. Breast cancer subtypes included hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- (45%), triple negative (TN) (25%), HR-/HER2+ (16%), and HR+/HER2+ (14%). The first treatment for BCBM patients following diagnosis was whole brain radiation (51%), surgery followed by stereotactic radiation (28%), and stereotactic radiation (21%). The interval between breast cancer diagnosis and diagnosis of BCBM was longest for HR+/HER2- 4.5 years, followed by TN 2.8 years, HR+/HER2+ 2.3 years, HR-/HER2+ 1.9 years, p=0.003. The interval from systemic metastases to BCBM diagnosis trended towards the shortest for TN patients 6.6 months, p=0.15. A total of 34 patients (28%) were diagnosed with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) at initial brain metastases presentation. LMD was diagnosed most commonly at presentation in HR+/HER2- (36%) followed by , TN (26%), HR-/HER2+ (26%), and HR+/HER2+ (6%), p=0.06. No differences were noted based on receptor typessubtype and age, symptomatic intracranial disease, number of brain metastases, type of first intracranial treatment or concurrent systemic metastases at initial BCBM presentation, all p &gt; 0.05. Twenty-four month KM OS rates following diagnosis of brain metastasis for breast-GPA 0-1, 1.5-2, 2.5-3, and 3.5-4 groups were 14%, 27%, 33%, and 86% (p=0.0005), respectively.

Conclusions: In our institutional analysis, similarities were noted in the initial presentation of BCBM based on receptor typesubtype. Significant differences were noted in OS based on the modified breast-GPA. Further investigation is needed to determine which subtypes of asymptomatic breast cancer patients are at sufficient risk to warrant brain MRI screening.

Citation Format: Yuki Kawahara, Matthew Fahey, Thrisha K Potluri, Matthew N Mills, Nicholas B Figura, Iman R Washington, Roberto Diaz, Timothy J Robinson, Hsiang-Hsuan M Yu, Arnold B Etame, James Liu, Michael A Vogelbaum, Brian J Czerniecki, Peter A Forsyth, Hatem H Soliman, Hyo S Han, Kamran A Ahmed. Characteristics of breast cancer brain metastases presentation by subtype and validation of the modified breast graded prognostic assessment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS14-19.

Abstract PS3-09: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pathological complete response(pCR) in the breast and axilla after the addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST)

Introduction: Immunotherapy use is increasing as an adjunct to current NST for breast cancer treatment with the goals of increasing pCR and down staging tumors. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of MRI in the evaluation of tumor response after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in combination with NST. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 105 women undergoing Immunotherapy in conjunction with NST at a single institution. All patients had been enrolled in IRB approved protocols and had undergone definitive surgery. Patients were excluded for: failure to complete at least two thirds of treatment, no pre or post treatment MRI, or surgery in an outside institution. We analyzed 73 patients from 5 distinct treatment protocols including: (1) 24 Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (pts) treated with Intratumoral Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) in combination with weekly paclitaxel followed by dose dense Adriamycin and Cytoxan (ddAC); (2) 19 HER2/Neu positive (HER2+) pts treated with subcutaneous interferon gamma (IFN-γ) in combination with weekly paclitaxel with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP); (3), 7 HER2+ pts treated with 3 weeks of HER2 pulsed dendritic cell vaccines (DC1) followed by Taxotere, Carboplatin, and HP; (4), 14 pts on the ISPY2 trial: 8 TNBC and 4 Hormone receptor positive, HER2/Neu negative (HR+) pts randomized to treatment with pembrolizumab with weekly paclitaxel followed by ddAC (2 also received additional SD101), and 2 TNBC pts treated with Durvalumab, Olaparib and Paclitaxel, followed by ddAC and (5) 9 HR+ pts on neoadjuvant Durvalumab and an Aromatase Inhibitor for 6 cycles. Results: A total of 73 patients were included in the study. Median age was 51 years (range 27-76); 46.6% of patients had TNBC, 35.6% had HER2+ and the remaining 17.8% were HR+ HER2-. The median clinical tumor size was 3.4cm (range 1.3-10.6) pre therapy and 1cm (range 0-10.1) post therapy. The pCR was 38.2%, 57.7%, and 0% respectively for TNBC, HER2+, HR+ tumors. Complete radiological response (rCR) of both the axilla and breast was 41.2%, 61.5% and 7.7%, for TNBC, HER2+ and HR+ tumors. The sensitivity of MRI to detect in breast pCR was 65.6% with a specificity of 81%, NPV and PPV of 75% and 73.3% respectively. MRI identified 37 pts with suspicious axillary nodes on pretreatment MRI; of these 30 had fine needle aspiration (FNA) confirmed metastatic disease. Post treatment, 70.3% (26/37) had normalized axillary nodes. Of those with normalized nodes, 26.9% (7/26) had residual cancer on final pathology. Of the patients with confirmed FNA lymph node metastasis, axillary pCR of 63.3% was achieved. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI to detect pCR within the axilla was 87% and 50% and NPV and PPV 70% and 74.1%, respectively. 3 patients had axillary disease on final pathology but no suspicious imaging and a benign FNA. Conclusion: The addition of immunotherapy to current NST strategies can improve pCR and decrease residual cancer burden. The PPV and NPV of MRI to predict pCR in patients undergoing immunotherapy in combination with NST remains within the ranges described in patients undergoing NST alone. MRI remains a useful tool to guide surgical management but is not accurate enough to replace pathological evaluation.

Citation Format: Noeline Rajarajan, Daniel Segarra, Robert J Weinfurtner, Adrian A Lopez, M Catherine Lee, John Kiluk, Hatem Soliman, Hung Khong, Han S Hyo, Marilin Rosa, Brian J Czerniecki, Nazanin Khakpour. The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pathological complete response(pCR) in the breast and axilla after the addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-09.

Feasibility of Axillary Lymph Node Localization and Excision Using Radar Reflector Localization

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is commonly used for patients with clinically detected nodal metastases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after NAC is feasible. Excision of biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes in addition to SLNB, termed targeted axillary dissection (TAD), decreases the false-negative rate of SLNB alone. Positive nodes can be marked with radar reflector-localization (RRL) clips. We report our institutional experience with RRL-guided TAD and demonstrate its safety and feasibility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of consecutive clinically node-positive female patients with breast cancer treated with NAC and RRL-guided TAD between January 2017 and September 2019. Clinicopathologic and treatment data were collected; descriptive statistics are reported.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were analyzed; the median age was 55 years (range, 20-72 years), and the median body mass index was 27.2 kg/m² (range, 16.5-40.4 kg/m²). All patients received NAC, primary breast surgery, and TAD. All clinically detected nodal metastases were confirmed with percutaneous biopsy and marked with a biopsy clip. RRL clips were implanted a median of 8 days (range, 1-167 days) prior to surgery; all were retrieved without complications. The RRL node was identified as the sentinel lymph node in 36 (80%) patients. Twenty-five patients had positive nodes, of which 24 were identified by RRL node excision, and 1 (4%) patient had a positive node identified by SLNB but not RRL. Over a median follow-up time of 29.6 months, 5 patients recurred (1 local, 4 distant).

CONCLUSIONS

RRL-guided TAD after NAC is safe and feasible. This technique allows for adequate assessment of the nodal basin and helps confirm excision of the previously biopsied positive axillary node.

Th1 cytokines in conjunction with pharmacological Akt inhibition potentiate apoptosis of breast cancer cells in vitro and suppress tumor growth in vivo

Targeted drug approaches have been a major focus for developing new anticancer therapies. Although many such agents approved in the last 20 years have improved outcomes, almost all have underperformed expectations. The full potential of such agents may yet be obtained through novel combinations. Previously, we showed that anti-estrogen drugs combined with a dendritic cell-based anti-HER-2 vaccine known to induce strong Th1-polarized immunity dramatically improved clinical response rates in patients with HER-2^pos/ER^pos early breast cancer. Here, we show that the small molecule Akt antagonist MK-2206, when combined with the Th1 cytokines IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha, maximize indicators of apoptotic cell death in a panel of phenotypically-diverse human breast cancer lines. These findings were mirrored by other, structurally-unrelated Akt-targeting drugs that work through different mechanisms. Interestingly, we found that MK-2206, as well as the other Akt antagonist drugs, also had a tendency to suppress Th1 cytokine expression in stimulated human and murine lymphocytes, potentially complicating their use in conjunction with active immunotherapy. After verifying that MK-2206 plus IFN-gamma could show similar combined effects against breast cancer lines, even in the absence of TNF-alpha, we tested in a rodent HER-2^pos breast cancer model either a HER-2-based DC vaccine, or recombinant IFN-gamma with or without MK-2206 administration. We found that for MK-2206, co-administration of recombinant IFN-gamma outperformed co-administration of DC vaccination for slowing tumor growth kinetics. These findings suggest a combined therapy approach for Akt-targeting drugs that incorporates recombinant Interferon-gamma and is potentially translatable to humans.

Clinical development of immunotherapies for HER2+ breast cancer: a review of HER2-directed monoclonal antibodies and beyond

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2⁺) breast cancer accounts for ~25% of breast cancer cases. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against HER2 have led to unparalleled clinical benefit for a subset of patients with HER2⁺ breast cancer. In this narrative review, we summarize advances in the understanding of immune system interactions, examine clinical developments, and suggest rationales for future investigation of immunotherapies for HER2⁺ breast cancer. Complex interactions have been found between different branches of the immune system, HER2⁺ breast cancer, and targeted treatments (approved and under investigation). A new wave of immunotherapies, such as novel HER2-directed mAbs, antibody drug conjugates, vaccines, and adoptive T-cell therapies, are being studied in a broad population of patients with HER2-expressing tumors. The development of immunotherapies for HER2⁺ breast cancer represents an evolving field that should take into account interactions between different components of the immune system.

Abstract OT3-10-01: Phase Ib study of stereotactic radiation and nivolumab in the management of metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases

Background:Patients with breast cancer brain metastases represent a poor prognosis cohort with a high unmet clinical need. Standard-of-care treatments for patients with breast cancer brain metastases include local treatments, such as surgical resection and radiation treatment modalities that include stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiotherapy. Numerous pre-clinical studies have provided evidence to combine radiation therapy with immune checkpoint inhibition to improve response rates. The evidence is strongest for short course, hypofractionated radiation regimens. We hypothesize treatment with nivolumab and SRS will be feasible and well tolerated and may improve intracranial tumor control rates compared to SRS alone. Trial Design:The study is designed as a prospective, single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, phase Ib trial of nivolumab and SRS among patients with metastatic breast cancer brain metastases. Treatment will be initiated with a dose of nivolumab (480 mg IV) that will be repeated every 4 weeks. The initial dose of nivolumab will be followed 1 week later by SRS at sites of brain metastases or post-operative cavities. Patients will be allowed to continue endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies if brain metastases progression was noted on these agents.Eligibility:Eligible patients include those ≥18, ECOG ≤2 with ≤10 breast cancer brain metastases of all subtypes eligible for stereotactic radiation. Specific Aims:The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of nivolumab and SRS to sites of brain metastases. Secondary objectives include evaluation of intracranial progression free survival (PFS), extracranial PFS, overall survival, local control, and distant brain control. Correlative aims include assessing blood and tissue biomarkers (i.e. PD-L1, mutation burden, TCR repertoire etc.) for association with clinical benefit.Statistical Methods:Safety and feasibility will be monitored by a 3 + 3 design followed by a dose expansion phase. Patient Accrual:This study is open with 4 patients enrolled at the time of submission. A total of 12 patients will be enrolled.Contact Information:Kamran A. Ahmed MD, Moffitt Cancer Center, email: kamran.ahmed@moffitt.org, Clinical trial information: NCT03807765.

Citation Format: Kamran A Ahmed, Youngchul Kim, Avan J. Armaghani, John A. Arrington, Jimmy J. Caudell, Ricardo L. Costa, Brian J. Czerniecki, Arnold B. Etame, Peter A. Forsyth, Hung T. Khong, Sungjune Kim, Loretta Loftus, Timothy J. Robinson, Marilin Rosa, Solmaz Sahebjam, Hatem H. Soliman, Aixa E. Soyano, Nam D. Tran, H. Michael Yu, Hyo S. Han. Phase Ib study of stereotactic radiation and nivolumab in the management of metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-10-01.

Management of brain metastases in breast cancer: a review of current practices and emerging treatments

PURPOSE

Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are becoming an increasingly common diagnosis due to improved systemic control and more routine surveillance imaging. Treatment continues to require a multidisciplinary approach managing systemic and intracranial disease burden. Although, improvements have been made in the diagnosis and management of BCBM, brain metastasis patients continue to pose a challenge for practitioners.

METHODS

In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in the treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of BCBM.

RESULTS

We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation for BCBM. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing prospective trials enrolling BCBM patients and their biologic rationale.

CONCLUSIONS

BCBM management is an increasing clinical concern. Multidisciplinary management combining the strengths of surgical, systemic, and radiation treatment modalities with prospective trials incorporating knowledge from the basic and translational sciences will ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes for BCBM patients.

Implant-sparing Mastectomy: An Alternative for Women Undergoing Mastectomy With Retropectoral Implants

INTRODUCTION

Implant-sparing mastectomy (ISM) is a skin-sparing mastectomy that preserves a retropectoral implant and potentially eliminates the need for tissue expansion or complex reconstruction. This study aimed to determine oncologic and surgical outcomes and reconstructive patterns in patients undergoing ISM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective review of patients undergoing ISM from 2006 to 2018 was performed. Patient/tumor characteristics, stage, adjuvant therapy use, 90-day complication rates, reconstruction type, and disease recurrence were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 121 ISMs in 73 women were performed. Seventy (57.9%) ISMs were for breast cancer (BC) treatment and 51 (42.1%) for prophylaxis. Among BC cases, 72.3% were cT1/cT2 and 73.8% were cN0; 72.3% received systemic therapy and 33.8% received radiation therapy. There were 3 deaths owing to BC at the median follow-up of 35 months. Among 5 recurrences, only 1 was local. There was no BC identified after prophylactic ISM. Total 90-day complication rate per ISM was 15.7%. Rates were 0.8% for both seroma and wound infection, 2.5% for wound dehiscence, 3.3% for hematoma, and 8.2% for skin necrosis. The majority (72.6%) of patients required only implant exchange for reconstruction. Overall use of autologous reconstruction was low (12.3%); 77.8% of flaps were performed in patients receiving radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

ISM is a unique approach for patients pursuing mastectomy for BC treatment or prevention with equivalent oncologic outcomes and complication rates to mastectomy with reconstruction. Reconstruction for the majority was markedly simplified by elimination of tissue expansion while maintaining a low rate of flap reconstruction.

T-helper 1-type cytokines induce apoptosis and loss of HER-family oncodriver expression in murine and human breast cancer cells

A recent neoadjuvant vaccine trial for early breast cancer induced strong Th1 immunity against the HER-2 oncodriver, complete pathologic responses in 18% of subjects, and for many individuals, dramatically reduced HER-2 expression on residual disease. To explain these observations, we investigated actions of Th1 cytokines (TNF-α and IFN-γ) on murine and human breast cancer cell lines that varied in the surface expression of HER-family receptor tyrosine kinases. Breast cancer lines were broadly sensitive to the combination of IFN-γ and TNF-α, as evidenced by lower metabolic activity, lower proliferation, and enhanced apoptosis, and in some cases a reversible inhibition of surface expression of HER proteins. Apoptosis was accompanied by caspase-3 activation. Furthermore, the pharmacologic caspase-3 activator PAC-1 mimicked both the killing effects and HER-2-suppressive activities of Th1 cytokines, while a caspase 3/7 inhibitor could prevent cytokine-induced HER-2 loss. These studies demonstrate that many in vivo effects of vaccination (apparent tumor cell death and loss of HER-2 expression) could be replicated in vitro using only the principle Th1 cytokines. These results are consistent with the notion that IFN-γ and TNF-α work in concert to mediate many biological effects of therapeutic vaccination through the induction of a caspase 3-associated cellular death mechanism.

Sequential Anti-PD1 Therapy Following Dendritic Cell Vaccination Improves Survival in a HER2 Mammary Carcinoma Model and Identifies a Critical Role for CD4 T Cells in Mediating the Response

Patients with metastatic HER2 breast cancer (MBC) often become resistant to HER 2 targeted therapy and have recurrence of disease. The Panacea trial suggested that HER2 MBC patients were more likely to respond to checkpoint therapy if TIL were present or if tumor expressed PD-L1. We assessed whether type I polarized dendritic cells (DC1) could improve checkpoint therapy in a preclinical model of HER2+ breast cancer. TUBO bearing mice were vaccinated with either MHC class I or class II HER2 peptide pulsed DC1 (class I or class II HER2-DC1) concurrently or sequentially with administration of anti-PD-1 or anti-PDL1. Infiltration of tumors by immune cells, induction of anti-HER2 immunity and response to therapy was evaluated. Class I or class II HER2-DC1 vaccinated mice generated anti-HER2 CD8 or CD4+ T cell immune responses and demonstrated delayed tumor growth. Combining both MHC class I and II HER2-pulsed DC1 did not further result in inhibition of tumor growth or enhanced survival compared to individual administration. Interestingly class II HER2-DC1 led to both increased CD4 and CD8 T cells in the tumor microenvironment while class I peptides typically resulted in only increased CD8 T cells. Anti-PD-1 but not anti-PD-L1 administered sequentially with class I or class II HER2-DC1 vaccine could improve the efficacy of HER2-DC1 vaccine as measured by tumor growth, survival, infiltration of tumors by T cells and increase in systemic anti-HER2 immune responses. Depletion of CD4+ T cells abrogated the anti-tumor efficacy of combination therapy with class II HER2-DC1 and anti-PD-1, suggesting that tumor regression was CD4 dependent. Since class II HER2-DC1 was as effective as class I, we combined class II HER2-DC1 vaccine with anti-rat neu antibodies and anti-PD-1 therapy. Combination therapy demonstrated further delay in tumor growth, and enhanced survival compared to control mice. In summary, Class II HER2-DC1 drives both a CD4 and CD8 T cell tumor infiltration that leads to increased survival, and in combination with anti-HER2 therapy and checkpoint blockade can improve survival in preclinical models of HER2 positive breast cancer and warrants exploration in patients with HER2 MBC.

Breast leptomeningeal disease: a review of current practices and updates on management

PURPOSE

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is an advanced metastatic disease presentation portending a poor prognosis with minimal treatment options. The advent and widespread use of new systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer has improved systemic disease control and extended survival; however, as patients live longer, the rates of breast cancer LMD are increasing.

METHODS

In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of breast cancer LMD.

RESULTS

We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, intrathecal, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation specific to breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we discuss the controversies within this unique clinical setting and identify potential clinical opportunities to improve upon the diagnosis, treatment, and treatment response evaluation in the management of breast LMD.

CONCLUSIONS

We recognize the shortcomings in our current understanding of the disease and explore the future role of genomic/molecular disease characterization, technological innovations, and ongoing clinical trials attempting to improve the prognosis for this advanced disease state.

Immunotherapy in breast cancer: Current status and future directions

Breast cancer, one of the leading causes of death in women in the United States, challenges therapeutic success in patients due to tumor heterogeneity, treatment resistance, metastasis and disease recurrence. Knowledge of immune system involvement in normal breast development and breast cancer has led to extensive research into the immune landscape of breast cancer and multiple immunotherapy clinical trials in breast cancer patients. However, poor immunogenicity and T-cell infiltration along with heightened immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment have been identified as potential challenges to the success of immunotherapy in breast cancer. Oncodrivers, owing to their enhanced expression and stimulation of tumor cell proliferation and survival, present an excellent choice for targeted immunotherapy development in breast cancer. Loss of anti-tumor immune response specific to oncodrivers has been reported in breast cancer patients as well. Dendritic cell vaccines have been tested for their efficacy in generating anti-tumor T-cell response against specific tumor-associated antigens and oncodrivers and have shown improved survival outcome in patients. Here, we review the current status of immunotherapy in breast cancer, focusing on dendritic cell vaccines and their therapeutic application in breast cancer. We further discuss future directions of breast cancer immunotherapy and potential combination strategies involving dendritic cell vaccines and existing chemotherapeutics for improved efficacy and better survival outcome in breast cancer.

Th1 cytokines sensitize HER-expressing breast cancer cells to lapatinib

The HER family of receptor tyrosine kinases has been linked to deregulation of growth and proliferation for multiple types of cancer. Members have therefore become thefocus of many drug and immune-based therapy innovations. The targeted anti-cancer agent, lapatinib, is a small molecule inhibitor that directly interferes with EGFR (HER-1)and HER-2 signaling, and indirectly reduces HER-3 signaling, thus suppressing important downstream events. A recently-developed dendritic cell-based vaccine against early breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS) that generates strong Th1-dominated immunity against HER-2 has induced pathologic complete response in about one-third of immunized individuals. In vitro studies suggested cytokines secreted by Th1 cells could be major contributors to the vaccine effects including induction of apoptosis and suppression of HER expression. With a view toward improving complete response rates, we investigated whether the principle Th1 cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α) could act in concert with lapatinib to suppress activity of breast cancer lines in vitro. Lapatinib-sensitive SKBR3, MDA-MB-468 and BT474 cells were incubated with Th1 cytokines, lapatinib, or both. It was found that combined treatment maximized metabolic suppression(Alamar Blue assay), as well as cell death (Trypan Blue) and apoptosis(Annexin V/Propidium Iodide and TMRE staining). Combined drug plus cytokine treatment also maximized suppression of both total and phosphorylated forms of HER-2 and HER-3. Interestingly, when lapatinib resistant lines MDA-MB-453 and JIMT-1 were tested, it was found that the presence of Th1 cytokines appeared to enhance sensitivity for lapatinib-induced metabolic suppression and induction of apoptotic cell death, nearly abrogating drug resistance. These studies provide pre-clinical data suggesting the possibility that targeted drug therapy may be combined with vaccination to enhance anti-cancer effects, and furthermore that robust immunity in the form of secreted Th1 cytokines may have the capacity to mitigate resistance to targeted drugs.

Immune interconnectivity of anatomically distant tumors as a potential mediator of systemic responses to local therapy

Complex interactions occur between tumor and host immune system at each site in the metastatic setting, the outcome of which can determine behavior ranging from dormancy to rapid growth. An additional layer of complexity arises from the understanding that cytotoxic T cells can traffic through the host circulatory system. Coupling mathematical models of local tumor-immune dynamics and systemic T cell trafficking allows us to simulate the evolution of tumor and immune cell populations in anatomically distant sites following local therapy and thus computationally evaluate immune interconnectivity. Results suggest that the presence of a secondary site may either inhibit or promote growth of the primary, depending on the capacity for immune recruitment of each tumor and the resulting systemic redistribution of T cells. Treatment such as surgical resection and radiotherapy can be simulated to estimate both the decrease in tumor volume at the local treatment-targeted site, and the change in overall tumor burden and tumor growth trajectories across all sites. Qualitatively similar responses of distant tumors to local therapy (positive and negative abscopal effects) to those reported in the clinical setting were observed. Such findings may facilitate an improved understanding of general disease kinetics in the metastatic setting: if metastatic sites are interconnected through the immune system, truly local therapy does not exist.

Histological immune response patterns in sentinel lymph nodes involved by metastatic melanoma and prognostic significance

BACKGROUND

To further characterize the micromorphometric immunological pattern to metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies and completion lymph node (CLN) dissections and their relation to 5-year overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of 49 patients from 1996 to 2005 with a positive SLN who underwent CLN dissection (CLD) was studied. Micromorphometric characteristics included follicular center count (FCC)/profile, sinus histiocytosis, metastatic size, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (intranodal), paracortical dendritic cells, germinal center reaction and morphology. Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves used the exact log-rank statistic.

RESULTS

In the high-FCC (n = 5-51) vs the low-FCC (n < 5) lymph nodes, a delayed separation occurred at 3 years, with 5-year OS rates being 73% vs 54% in the high- and low-FCC groups, respectively. Improved survival up to 3 years was also noted in CLDs that showed a higher FCC when compared to the prior SLN. Patients with metastatic deposits >2 mm had significantly lower 5-year survival (both <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal micromorphometric features (ie, FCC) are probably related to host immune response to metastasis. Quantitative evaluation of lymphoid follicular centers could provide valuable prognostic information to help to stratify patients.

Oncoplastic Surgery: Keeping It Simple With 5 Essential Volume Displacement Techniques for Breast Conservation in a Patient With Moderate- to Large-Sized Breasts

Oncoplastic surgery is an evolving field in breast surgery combining the strengths of breast surgical oncology with plastic surgery. It provides the surgeon the ability to excise large areas of the breast in the oncologic resection without compromising, and possibly improving, its aesthetic appearance. The purpose of this review is to provide a guide that could help a breast surgeon excise breast cancer in most areas of the breast using 5 oncoplastic techniques. These techniques would be used depending primarily on the location of the cancer in the breast and also on the size of the tumor.