Blood biomarkers predict outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint Inhibitors: A pooled analysis of 44 retrospective sudies

Evaluation of hyperprogressive disease with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma: A secondary analysis of the IMbrave150 trial

The use of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been associated with an increased risk of hyperprogressive disease (HPD), the occurrence of which carries a poor prognosis. However, it is unknown whether contemporary frontline treatment with the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab causes significant HPD. This study conducted a secondary analysis of patient-level data from the IMbrave150 randomized controlled trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib for frontline treatment of HCC. Multiple established definitions of early progression and treatment failure applicable to clinical trials were evaluated, including Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) HPD, HPD based on percent change of sum of longest diameter (SLD HPD), treatment failure HPD (TF HPD), and fast progression (FP). The incidence of these measures was compared between arms. The risk factors for and prognosis of TF HPD were evaluated. The risk of RECIST HPD and TF HPD was significantly lower with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment than with sorafenib treatment-odds ratio for RECIST HPD: 0.29 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.82), TF HPD: 0.30 (0.17, 0.54). TF HPD was similarly associated with poor prognosis, irrespective of treatment arm. High blood alpha-fetoprotein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were both associated with an increased risk of TF HPD. For all definitions of early progression/treatment failure, the risk was either significantly lower with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab than with sorafenib, or there were no differences. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment is unlikely to cause significant HPD.

Splenic volume as a predictor of survival in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Objective

This investigation seeks to examine the association between spleen volume and prognosis in cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis involving 61 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICIs at our institution. We evaluated the relationship between baseline splenic volume and its changes during ICI therapy concerning overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using a log-rank test. To identify relevant literature, we searched databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up until February 20, 2024. The primary metrics assessed were hazard ratios (HR) for both OS and PFS, with pooled estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated.

Results

Within our study population, findings demonstrated a significantly decreased OS (HR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.08-3.77, p = 0.027) and PFS (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.05-3.21, p = 0.032) in HCC patients with a high baseline spleen volume, compared to individuals with lower spleen volumes. Additionally, HCC patients who experienced an increase in spleen volume during ICI therapy exhibited significantly poorer OS (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.17-4.41, p = 0.016) and PFS (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.30-4.41, p = 0.005) than those whose spleen volume decreased. The meta-analysis results revealed that subjects with higher spleen volumes had a significantly reduced OS (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.12-2.72, p = 0.014) and PFS (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.15-1.58, p < 0.001) compared to counterparts with lower volumes. Furthermore, the data clearly highlighted that patients with increases in splenic volume faced significantly poorer clinical outcomes, as indicated by reduced OS (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.36-2.46, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.28-2.25, p < 0.001) relative to those with decreases in splenic size.

Conclusion

A higher baseline spleen volume and an increase in spleen volume during ICI therapy were predictors of a poor prognosis in cancer patients treated with ICI.

Reliable Performance of mALBI Grade-Based Risk Models for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment: Comparative Analysis of 13 Risk Models

AIM

This study aimed to compare the prognostic performance of the risk models for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) as first-line treatment.

METHODS

Among 449 patients included in this retrospective multicenter study, we compared the prognostic performance of 13 risk models for the 12-month and 18-month survival status using area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and relative integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analysis. We also constructed a calibration plot to assess the fitness of each model.

RESULTS

Regarding the analysis of the 12-month survival status, none of the risk models demonstrated AUC values higher than the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade. In the NRI analysis, only the IMmunotherapy with AFP, BCLC staging, mALBI, and DCP evaluation (IMABALI-De score) exhibited a statistically significant improvement compared with the mALBI grade (p = 0.009). While the modified albumin-bilirubin grade (mALF) score and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) did not exhibit significant differences compared to the mALBI grade (p = 0.3 and 0.2, respectively), the remaining risk models were inferior to the mALBI grade. In the relative IDI analysis, none of the risk models showed a significant improvement compared with the mALBI grade. The calibration plot of the PNI was unsatisfactory. The results for the 18-month survival status were consistent with those for the 12-month survival status. A time-dependent ROC analysis demonstrated that both the mALBI grade and the mALBI-based model showed consistent performance over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The mALBI grade, as well as the IMABALI-De and mALF scores (both of which are risk models based on mALBI grade), exhibited reliable performance in predicting the prognosis of patients with HCC.

Baseline (modified) Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of therapeutic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

A systemic analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic utility of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and the modified (m)GPS in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases were searched for entries added until May 1st, 2023, to obtain relevant articles for this study. The analysis examined several clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR). In this analysis, a total of 38 articles with 3,772 patients were included. The pooled results indicated that patients with high GPS levels had shorter OS [GPS 2 vs. 0, hazard ratio (HR): 4.35, P<0.001; GPS 1 vs. 0, HR: 2.00, P<0.001; GPS 2 vs. 1/0, HR: 2.62, P<0.001; GPS 2/1 vs. 0, HR: 2.60, P<0.001) and PFS (GPS 2 vs. 0, HR: 2.11, P=0.001; GPS 1 vs. 0, HR: 1.33, P=0.001; GPS 2 vs. 1/0, HR: 2.11, P<0.001; GPS 2/1 vs. 0, HR: 1.62, P<0.001], as well as a lower DCR [GPS 2 vs. 1/0, odds ratio (OR): 0.53, P<0.001, GPS 2/1 vs. 0, OR: 0.51, P<0.001]. It was also found that patients with high mGPS levels had poorer OS (mGPS 2 vs. 0, HR: 3.15, P<0.001; mGPS 1 vs. 0, HR: 1.70, P<0.001; mGPS 2 vs. 1/0, HR: 1.95, P=0.049; mGPS 2/1 vs. 0, HR: 3.14, P=0.041; continuous variables, HR: 1.52, P<0.001) and PFS (mGPS 2 vs. 0, HR: 2.70, P<0.001; mGPS 1 vs. 0, HR: 1.74, P=0.016; mGPS 2 vs. 1/0, HR: 1.91, P=0.044; continuous variables, HR: 1.29, P<0.001), and lower DCR (mGPS 2 vs. 1/0, HR: 0.46, P<0.001). In conclusion, the GPS and mGPS were reliable predictors of outcomes in cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Serum IL-6 concentration is a useful biomarker to predict the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aims to identify biomarkers for treatment response of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

96 patients who received Atezo+Bev or lenvatinib as a first-line systemic therapy were enrolled as the training group after propensity score matching (PSM), and 42 patients treated with Atezo+Bev were enrolled as the validation group. 17 serum cytokines were measured by Luminex multiplex assay at the start of treatment. For further assessment of the association between cytokine levels and the tumor microenvironment (TME), immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on pre-treatment liver biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

In the derivation set, multivariate analysis identified elevated IL-6 as an independent risk factor in the Atezo+Bev group (HR 5.80: p<0.01), but not in the lenvatinib group; in a subset analysis of patients with low IL-6, PFS was longer in the Atezo+Bev training group than in the lenvatinib group (p = 0.02). A validation study also showed a significantly longer prognosis in the low IL-6 group for both PFS (p = 0.0001) and OS (p = 0.03). Serum IL-6 had a positive correlation with tumor IL-6 expression (ρ = 0.56, p < 0.0001) and an inverse correlation with the CD8/CD163-positive cell count ratio (ρ = -0.4, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Serum IL-6 levels are thought to be involved in the suppression of tumor immunity and are useful in predicting the therapeutic effect of Atezo+Bev treatment.

Molecular and immune landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma to guide therapeutic decision-making

Liver cancer, primarily HCC, exhibits highly heterogeneous histological and molecular aberrations across tumors and within individual tumor nodules. Such intertumor and intratumor heterogeneities may lead to diversity in the natural history of disease progression and various clinical disparities across the patients. Recently developed multimodality, single-cell, and spatial omics profiling technologies have enabled interrogation of the intertumor/intratumor heterogeneity in the cancer cells and the tumor immune microenvironment. These features may influence the natural history and efficacy of emerging therapies targeting novel molecular and immune pathways, some of which had been deemed undruggable. Thus, comprehensive characterization of the heterogeneities at various levels may facilitate the discovery of biomarkers that enable personalized and rational treatment decisions, and optimize treatment efficacy while minimizing the risk of adverse effects. Such companion biomarkers will also refine HCC treatment algorithms across disease stages for cost-effective patient management by optimizing the allocation of limited medical resources. Despite this promise, the complexity of the intertumor/intratumor heterogeneity and ever-expanding inventory of therapeutic agents and regimens have made clinical evaluation and translation of biomarkers increasingly challenging. To address this issue, novel clinical trial designs have been proposed and incorporated into recent studies. In this review, we discuss the latest findings in the molecular and immune landscape of HCC for their potential and utility as biomarkers, the framework of evaluation and clinical application of predictive/prognostic biomarkers, and ongoing biomarker-guided therapeutic clinical trials. These new developments may revolutionize patient care and substantially impact the still dismal HCC mortality.

Prognostic value of body adipose tissue parameters in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Objective

This study aims to explore the relationship between body adipose tissue characteristics and clinical outcomes in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

Methods

We conducted an extensive literature search across three major online databases-Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library-to identify studies examining the link between body adipose tissue and treatment outcomes in cancer patients undergoing ICI therapy, from the inception of each database until February 20, 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The primary outcomes analyzed were hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as odds ratios (ORs) for disease control rate (DCR). Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

A total of 23 studies were included, encompassing 2741 cancer patients. The analysis revealed that patients with higher levels of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) exhibited significantly improved OS (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.89, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.96, p = 0.015), along with a higher DCR (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.26-2.60, p = 0.001), compared to those with lower VAT levels. Additionally, increased subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) levels were associated with significantly better OS (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58-0.82, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-1.00, p = 0.049), and a higher DCR (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.15-3.44, p = 0.014). Elevated total adipose tissue (TAT) levels were also linked to longer OS (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.97, p = 0.028). However, a higher visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio (VSR) was associated with a shorter OS (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09-1.87, p = 0.010). No significant relationship was found between TAT (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.54-1.23, p = 0.332) and VSR (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.95-1.51, p = 0.131) with PFS in ICI-treated patients.

Conclusion

This study highlights the prognostic relevance of VAT and SAT in predicting treatment response and survival outcomes in cancer patients receiving ICIs. These findings suggest that assessments of VAT and SAT should be incorporated into prognostic evaluations for this patient population.

Baseline (derived) neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio associated with survival in gastroesophageal junction or gastric cancer treated with ICIs

Objective

We carried out the meta-analysis to determine the predictive value of baseline neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) levels in patients with gastroesophageal junction or gastric cancer (GJGC) who underwent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.

Methods

Eligible articles were obtained through PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, until April 15, 2023. The clinical outcomes evaluated in this study encompassed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

A total of 24 articles with 2221 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with high NLR levels had significantly poorer OS (HR: 1.860, 95% CI: 1.564-2.213, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.354-2.079, p < 0.001), and lower ORR (OR: 0.754, 95% CI: 0.621-0.915, p = 0.004) and DCR (OR: 0.391, 95% CI: 0.262-0.582, p < 0.001). Besides, we also found that high dNLR levels were significantly associated with shorter OS (HR: 2.117, 95% CI: 1.590-2.820, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.803, 95% CI: 1.415-2.297, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Low baseline (Derived) NLR has the potential to predict the good efficacy of ICIs and survival outcomes in patients with GJGC. (Derived) NLR could be useful in determining the optimal treatment strategies for these patients.

The AFCRPLITY score for predicting the prognosis of immunotherapy combined with local-regional therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy combined with intra-arterial therapy (IAT) has shown great potential in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, there are currently no available biomarkers that can predict the prognosis of immune-based combined therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To establish a scoring method to predict prognosis in uHCC patients undergoing IAT plus immunotherapy.

METHODS

Between March 2019 and August 2022, uHCC patients undergoing IAT in combination with programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1-based immunotherapy were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 1046 patients included, 780 patients were enrolled into hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy immunotherapy cohorts (training set: n = 546, one center; external testing set: n = 234, three centers) and 266 patients were treated with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus immunotherapy were enrolled into TACE immunotherapy cohort (validation set: n = 266). We developed the easy-to-apply alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in immunotherapy (AFCRPLITY) score and investigated the prognostic value of baseline variables on the disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS). HCC patients with low AFCRPLITY scores would have better PFS and DCRs than patients with high AFCRPLITY scores (AFCRPLITY 0: vs AFCRPLITY 1: vs AFCRPLITY 2: vs AFCRPLITY 3: p < 0.001 for PFS, p = 0.001 for DCRs) in the training set, which was confirmed in the external testing set and validation set. The highest level of CD8+ T cells was in the AFCRPLITY score = 0 group than the other two groups.

CONCLUSION

The AFCRPLITY score is associated with PFS and DCR in uHCC patients receiving IATs plus immunotherapy. This score may be helpful for counseling, but prospective validation is needed.

DESIGN

A retrospective, multi-institutional study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study has been retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/, ChiCTR2300075828).

Preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio may be a good prognostic marker in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Systemic inflammatory response represented by C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) was shown to be associated with long-term outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative CAR in patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC.

Methods

We searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library) from inception to May 10th, 2024. Studies investigating the prognostic value of preoperative CAR in HCC patients after hepatectomy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Data from individual studies were aggregated to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 11 studies included 4,066 patients were finally analyzed in the meta-analysis. Overall, the higher preoperative CAR was associated with poorer OS (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.22, I 2 = 0%) and DFS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.02, I 2 = 0%) rate. Furthermore, subgroup analyses indicated that CAR could be a prognostic biomarker for patients with HCC regardless of regions and cut-off value.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis indicates that higher preoperative CAR level is associated with poorer OS and DFS, it may be a good prognostic marker of survival outcomes after hepatectomy in patients with HCC. However, future prospective trials are necessary to validate the conclusion.

Systematic review registration

The study protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/uavt8).

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive biomarker for hyperprogressive disease mediated by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a novel pattern of paradoxically rapid tumor progression, which often leads to early death, mostly in the first 2 months of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Currently, there is no validated biomarker to assess patients at risk of HPD.

Aim

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in HPD and establish a reliable variable to support clinicians in defining personalized treatment strategies.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published before 31 December 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of eligible studies. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects or a fixed-effects model to evaluate the association between the NLR and the risk of HPD.

Results

A total of 17 studies with 2,964 patients were included for meta-analysis. The incidence of HPD across different types of tumors ranged from 6.3% to 35.6%. In the pooled analysis of the NLR and HPD, we identified that the NLR significantly associated with the risk of HPD (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.91; p = 0.01) (I 2 = 52%, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

In the future, the NLR may serve as a remarkable biomarker for predicting the risk of HPD in clinical practice.

Biomarkers for Immunotherapy Efficacy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver malignancy and the sixth most common cancer globally, remains fatal for many patients with inappropriate responses to treatment. Recent advancements in immunotherapy have transformed the treatment landscape for advanced HCC. However, variability in patient responses to immunotherapy highlights the need for biomarkers that can predict treatment outcomes. This manuscript comprehensively reviews the evolving role of biomarkers in immunotherapy efficacy, spanning from blood-derived indicators-alpha-fetoprotein, inflammatory markers, cytokines, circulating tumor cells, and their DNA-to tissue-derived indicators-programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. The current body of evidence suggests that these biomarkers hold promise for improving patient selection and predicting immunotherapy outcomes. Each biomarker offers unique insights into disease biology and the immune landscape of HCC, potentially enhancing the precision of treatment strategies. However, challenges such as methodological variability, high costs, inconsistent findings, and the need for large-scale validation in well-powered two-arm trial studies persist, making them currently unsuitable for integration into standard care. Addressing these challenges through standardized techniques and implementation of further studies will be critical for the future incorporation of these biomarkers into clinical practice for advanced HCC.

Unraveling the role of ADAMs in clinical heterogeneity and the immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma: insights from single-cell, spatial transcriptomics, and bulk RNA sequencing

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent and heterogeneous tumor with limited treatment options and unfavorable prognosis. The crucial role of a disintegrin and metalloprotease (ADAM) gene family in the tumor microenvironment of HCC remains unclear.

Methods

This study employed a novel multi-omics integration strategy to investigate the potential roles of ADAM family signals in HCC. A series of single-cell and spatial omics algorithms were utilized to uncover the molecular characteristics of ADAM family genes within HCC. The GSVA package was utilized to compute the scores for ADAM family signals, subsequently stratified into three categories: high, medium, and low ADAM signal levels through unsupervised clustering. Furthermore, we developed and rigorously validated an innovative and robust clinical prognosis assessment model by employing 99 mainstream machine learning algorithms in conjunction with co-expression feature spectra of ADAM family genes. To validate our findings, we conducted PCR and IHC experiments to confirm differential expression patterns within the ADAM family genes.

Results

Gene signals from the ADAM family were notably abundant in endothelial cells, liver cells, and monocyte macrophages. Single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics analyses have both revealed the molecular heterogeneity of the ADAM gene family, further emphasizing its significant impact on the development and progression of HCC. In HCC tissues, the expression levels of ADAM9, ADAM10, ADAM15, and ADAM17 were markedly elevated. Elevated ADAM family signal scores were linked to adverse clinical outcomes and disruptions in the immune microenvironment and metabolic reprogramming. An ADAM prognosis signal, developed through the utilization of 99 machine learning algorithms, could accurately forecast the survival duration of HCC, achieving an AUC value of approximately 0.9.

Conclusions

This study represented the inaugural report on the deleterious impact and prognostic significance of ADAM family signals within the tumor microenvironment of HCC.

Prognostic analysis of systemic antitumor therapy in young patients with advanced liver cancer: A cohort study

Advanced liver cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the elderly, but it also occurs in young people in areas where hepatitis B virus is prevalent. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of systemic antitumor therapy in young patients with advanced liver cancer and investigate the influencing factors. The baseline demographic and clinical data of 38 young patients (≤35 years old) with liver cancer were collected as group A and that of 79 elderly patients (≥55 years old) with liver cancer were collected as group B. There were no significant between-group differences regarding the proportion of patients with increased serum aspartate aminotransferase, low serum albumin, increased α-fetoprotein (AFP) and high Child-Pugh score. The median (m)PFS time in groups A and B was 3.9 and 8.3 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.702; P=0.009]. The mOS in group A (17.6 months) was 12.4 months shorter than that in group B (HR, 1.799; P=0.010). In the subgroup analysis, male sex [HR, 1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-2.79], pathological diagnosis (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.10-2.91), previous surgical treatment (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.18-3.95), no tumor thrombus (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.22-4.93), increased alanine aminotransferase (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.65), increased aspartate aminotransferase (HR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.62-6.39), normal total bilirubin (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.09-2.87) and increased AFP (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.19-3.41) were associated with shorter survival time in group A compared with those in group B (P<0.05). Group A also had a higher incidence of hyper-progressive disease (HPD) (31.6 vs. 3.8%; P<0.001). HPD was a risk factor for advanced liver cancer (HR, 4.530; 95% CI, 2.251-9.115; P<0.001]. In conclusion, the efficacy of systemic antitumor therapy in young patients was poorer compared with that in elderly patients. Young patients with liver cancer had a high HBV infection rate and were prone to HPD.

How General and Inflammatory Status Impacts on the Prognosis of Patients Affected by Lung Cancer: State of the Art

Pulmonary cancer is often associated with systemic inflammation and poor nutritional status and these two aspects are strongly correlated and related to the scarce infiltration of a tumor by immune cells. We reviewed all English literature reviews from 2000 to 2024 from PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar, including original articles, review articles, and metanalyses. We excluded non-English language articles and case reports/case series. Generally speaking, nutritional and inflammatory status largely affect medium and long-term prognosis in lung cancer patients. A correct stratification of patients could improve their preoperative general functional nutritional and inflammatory status, minimizing, therefore, possible treatment complications and improving long-term prognosis.

Association of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with clinical outcomes in cancer immunotherapy: An evidence synthesis from 30 meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

The Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) holds relevance in cancer immunotherapy outcomes, yet its validation remains limited. Thus, we conducted an umbrella review to comprehensively assess the association between pretreatment NLR and immunotherapy outcomes, along with evaluating their credibility and strength.

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane, were systematically searched for eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Quality assessment and evidence grading utilized AMSTAR, GRADE, and additional classification criteria, following PRISMA and PRIOR guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty unique meta-analyses were included, with 24 associations (80%) exhibiting statistical significance. Notably, associations between pretreatment NLR and the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer garnered highly suggestive or convincing evidence grading.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated pretreatment NLR correlates with poor outcomes in cancer immunotherapy, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for identifying appropriate treatment populations and predicting clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, further validation through prospective cohort studies is warranted.

Prognostic biomarkers associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma

The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly advanced HCC, has been a serious challenge. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are landmark drugs in the field of cancer therapy in recent years, which have changed the landscape of cancer treatment. In the field of HCC treatment, this class of drugs has shown good therapeutic prospects. For example, atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab has been approved as first-line treatment for advanced HCC due to significant efficacy. However, sensitivity to ICI therapy varies widely among HCC patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to search for determinants of resistance/sensitivity to ICIs and to screen biomarkers that can predict the efficacy of ICIs. This manuscript reviews the research progress of prognostic biomarkers associated with ICIs in HCC in order to provide a scientific basis for the development of clinically individualised precision medication regimens.

Real-world study of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus

Background

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) present a poor prognosis. Current systemic therapies offer limited benefits. Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a local regional treatment for advanced HCC, particularly in selected patients such as patients with PVTT or high intrahepatic tumor burden.

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for HCC patients with PVTT, and explore factors related to survival prognosis, providing clues for treatment decisions for HCC patients.

Design

This is a single-center retrospective study conducted over 2 years on consecutive PVTT patients receiving HAIC combined anti-PD-1 antibodies.

Methods

The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors affecting OS. Treatment-associated adverse events were evaluated as well.

Results

A total of 119 patients were analyzed. The median OS and PFS were 14.9 months and 6.9 months. A total of 31.1% of grade 3-4 adverse events were reported, with elevated transaminase and total bilirubin being the most common. The independent variables correlated with survival include treatment-related alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response, the presence of extrahepatic organ metastasis, absolute value of platelet (PLT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and combined usage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Conclusion

In HCC patients with PVTT, combination therapy with HAIC and anti-PD-1 antibodies might be a promising therapy. The efficacy and safety of this combination protocol on patients with HCC complicated by PVTT warrants further investigation prospectively, especially in combination with TKIs.

Association of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) and Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) score with immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal and lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis, evaluating the prognostic significance of the baseline Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) and Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) Score in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed across various databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, until October 21, 2023, to compile relevant articles for analysis. The investigation encompassed diverse clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

This analysis included a total of 15 articles, comprising 19 studies involving 3335 patients. Among the 19 studies, nine studies focused on NSCLC, and six studies were conducted on HCC. Pooled results revealed that patients with elevated ALI levels experienced prolonged OS (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.37-0.70, p < 0.001) and extended PFS (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.52-0.72, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a GRIm score > 1 was associated with reduced OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.47-2.92, p < 0.001) and diminished PFS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.35-2.34, p < 0.001) in cancer patients receiving ICIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that ALI cutoff values of 18 exhibited enhanced predictive potential. Additionally, for HCC patients, those with HCC-GRIm score > 2 showed a substantially decreased risk of mortality compared to individuals with HCC-GRIm score ≤ 2 (HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.89-3.65, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ALI and GRIm score served as dependable prognostic indicators for patients undergoing ICI therapy in the context of cancer treatment.

Systemic and local immunosuppression in glioblastoma and its prognostic significance

The effectiveness of tumor therapy, especially immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy, critically depends on the activity of the host immune cells. However, various local and systemic mechanisms of immunosuppression operate in cancer patients. Tumor-associated immunosuppression involves deregulation of many components of immunity, including a decrease in the number of T lymphocytes (lymphopenia), an increase in the levels or ratios of circulating and tumor-infiltrating immunosuppressive subsets [e.g., macrophages, microglia, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs)], as well as defective functions of subsets of antigen-presenting, helper and effector immune cell due to altered expression of various soluble and membrane proteins (receptors, costimulatory molecules, and cytokines). In this review, we specifically focus on data from patients with glioblastoma/glioma before standard chemoradiotherapy. We discuss glioblastoma-related immunosuppression at baseline and the prognostic significance of different subsets of circulating and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (lymphocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, Tregs, natural killer (NK) cells, neutrophils, macrophages, MDSCs, and dendritic cells), including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), focus on the immune landscape and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas, proneural, classical and mesenchymal molecular subtypes, and highlight the features of immune surveillance in the brain. All attempts to identify a reliable prognostic immune marker in glioblastoma tissue have led to contradictory results, which can be explained, among other things, by the unprecedented level of spatial heterogeneity of the immune infiltrate and the significant phenotypic diversity and (dys)functional states of immune subpopulations. High NLR is one of the most repeatedly confirmed independent prognostic factors for shorter overall survival in patients with glioblastoma and carcinoma, and its combination with other markers of the immune response or systemic inflammation significantly improves the accuracy of prediction; however, more prospective studies are needed to confirm the prognostic/predictive power of NLR. We call for the inclusion of dynamic assessment of NLR and other blood inflammatory markers (e.g., absolute/total lymphocyte count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, and systemic immune response index) in all neuro-oncology studies for rigorous evaluation and comparison of their individual and combinatorial prognostic/predictive significance and relative superiority.

The combination treatment of oncolytic adenovirus H101 with nivolumab for refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an open-label, single-arm, pilot study

BACKGROUND

H101, an innovative oncolytic adenovirus, has shown potential in modifying the tumor microenvironment from immunologically 'cold' to 'hot'. When combined with nivolumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor, this synergy may offer substantial therapeutic benefits beyond the capabilities of each agent alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this pilot study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of combining H101 with nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who failed prior systemic therapy. The participants received initial oncolytic virus (OV) pretreatment with intratumoral H101 injections (5.0 × 1011 vp/0.5 ml/vial, two vials per lesion) on days 1 and 3. Combination therapy started on day 8, with H101 administered every 2 or 4 weeks and nivolumab (240 mg) injections every 2 weeks. Treatment continued up to 12 months or until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or study conclusion. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Between March 2020 and March 2022, 18 of 21 screened patients were assessable, showing an ORR of 11.1% [two cases of partial response (PR) and five cases of stable disease], with extrahepatic injections often leading to favorable outcomes. The disease control rate stood at 38.9%, with a 6-month survival rate of 88.9%. Median progression-free survival was 2.69 months, and overall survival (OS) was 15.04 months. Common adverse events included low-grade fever (100%) and pain related to centesis (33.3%), and no grade 3/4 events were reported. Significantly, local H101 injection showed potential in reversing immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance, evidenced by over 2.5 years of extended OS in PR cases with low α-fetoprotein. Additionally, decreasing neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio during OV pretreatment may predict positive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the potential efficacy of combining H101 with nivolumab in treating refractory advanced HCC, with well-tolerated toxicities.

The predictive value of sarcopenia and myosteatosis in trans-arterial (chemo)-embolization treated HCC patients

BACKGROUND

We conducted a meta-analysis to provide evidence-based results for the predictive values of sarcopenia, skeletal muscle index, psoas muscle index and the myosteatosis regarding the impact of survival outcomes and tumor response in patients treated by trans-arterial (chemo)-embolization (TAE/TACE), thereby optimizing therapeutic strategies and maximizing clinical benefits for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Qualified studies were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar before June 19, 2023. We investigated the relationships between sarcopenia, SMI, PMI, myosteatosis, and the overall survival of TAE/TACE-treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients with pooling data.

RESULTS

A total of 167 studies were collected and 12 studies were finally included for analysis. The meta-analysis assisted that the sarcopenia (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.30-1.64, p < 0.001), skeletal muscle index (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.29-1.69, p < 0.001), and psoas muscle index (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.19-1.77, p < 0.001) were significantly related to a shorter OS of hepatocellular carcinoma patients who treated by TAE/TACE. Sarcopenia significantly contributed to a lower objective response rate of TAE/TACE treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98, p = 0.032). But there was no significant association between the myosteatosis and the overall survival (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.74-2.25, p = 0.366). Sensitivity analysis supported the stability and dependability of above analyses conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia, skeletal muscle index and psoas muscle index, are significant prognostic predictors for TAE/TACE treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients. While myosteasis does not demonstrate a prognostic impact on the overall survival of TAE/TACE treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Sarcopenia affects the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with gastrointestinal cancers

OBJECTIVE

The impact of sarcopenia on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) patients remains uncertain in clinical practice. Hence, this study aims to investigate the potential correlation between sarcopenia and the clinical outcomes of GIC patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

To gather pertinent studies, a systematic literature search was implemented across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), measured with the hazard ratio (HR). And the secondary outcomes, including disease control rate (DCR), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AE), were evaluated with the odd ratio (OR).

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles involving 1294 patients were collected for this analysis. The pooled results revealed that GIC patients with sarcopenia had significantly poorer OS (HR = 1.697, 95% CI = 1.367-2.106, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.551, 95% CI: 1.312-1.833, p < 0.001), and lower ORR (OR = 0.594, 95% CI = 0.388-0.909, p = 0.016) and DCR (OR: 0.553, 95% CI: 0.360-0.850, p = 0.007) compared to those without sarcopenia. However, sarcopenia did not increase the incidence of treatment-related adverse events compared with non-sarcopenia (OR = 1.377, 95% CI = 0.693-2.737, p = 0.361). According to subgroup analysis, the association between sarcopenia and the therapeutic effect of ICI on patients with primary liver cancer or gastric cancer was consistent with the above findings.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia is significantly correlated with poorer treatment response and worse long-term efficacy in GIC patients treated with ICIs. Moreover, sarcopenia does not increase the incidence of adverse events.

Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Indicator in Thyroid Cancer

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis to assess the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels in patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer.

METHODS

We systematically searched multiple databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, up until March 30, 2023, to identify relevant articles. The clinical outcomes evaluated in this study included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cause-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

This analysis includes 21 articles with 5187 patients in total. The pooled results revealed that patients with high NLR levels had significantly poorer OS (HR: 2.578, 95% CI: 2.050-3.242, P < 0.001), PFS (HR: 2.143, 95% CI: 1.616-2.843, P < 0.001), DFS (HR: 1.377, 95% CI: 1.045-1.816, P = 0.023), and CSS (HR: 2.842, 95% CI: 1.334-6.053, P = 0.007). The subgroup analyses were performed based on different study regions, treatment modalities, cancer types, and NLR cut-off values, and the above conclusion remained consistent in the majority of subgroup analyses. The stability and reliability of the aforementioned results were supported by the sensitivity analysis and publication bias test.

CONCLUSION

The baseline NLR levels were useful predictors of outcomes in patients with thyroid cancer.

Biomarkers predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a transformative approach in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite their success, challenges persist, including concerns about their effectiveness, treatment costs, frequent occurrence of treatment-related adverse events, and tumor hyperprogression. Therefore, it is imperative to identify indicators capable of predicting the efficacy of ICIs treatment, enabling optimal patient selection to maximize clinical benefits while minimizing unnecessary toxic side effects and economic losses. This review paper categorizes prognostic biomarkers of ICIs treatment into the following categories: biochemical and cytological indicators, tumor-related markers, imaging and personal features, etiology, gut microbiome, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). By organizing these indicators systematically, we aim to guide biomarker exploration and inform clinical treatment decisions.

The Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with PD-(L)1 Inhibitors and Molecular Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Unsuitable for Transarterial Chemoembolization

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with PD-(L)1 inhibitors and molecular targeted therapies (MTT) for intermediate and advanced HCC that are unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from patients with TACE-unsuitable HCC who were receiving triple therapy from January 2020 to December 2021 at two medical centers. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR), disease control rates (DCR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 55 patients were enrolled in the study with median treatment periods of 4 and 6 for HAIC and PD-(L)1 inhibitors, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 15.0 and 10.0 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 11.0 months (range: 4.0-27.5 months). According to the mRECIST criteria, the optimal ORR was 43.6% (24/55) and the DCR was 61.8% (34/55). The incidence of AEs was 58.2%, with grade 3 and above accounting for 20.0%; elevated AST (18.2%), hyperbilirubinemia (16.4%), and thrombocytopenia (16.4%) were most common. There were no treatment-related fatalities and all AEs were effectively managed. Multifactorial analysis showed that NLR > 3.82 (HR 2.380, 95% CI 1.116-2-5.079, P = 0.025), ECOG 1 (HR 2.906, 95% CI 1.373-6.154, P = 0.005), and extrahepatic metastases (HR 8.373, 95% CI 3.492-20.078, P < 0.001) were associated with the median OS.

Conclusion

Triple therapy with HAIC, PD-(L)1 inhibitors, and MTT was safe and effective for patients with intermediate and advanced HCC for TACE-unsuitability.

Development and Assessment of Nomogram Based on AFP Response for Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been increasingly used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prognostic biomarkers are an unmet need. We aimed to develop a prognostic nomogram for patients with unresectable HCC receiving ICIs therapy.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with unresectable HCC receiving ICIs treatment were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 84) and a validation set (n = 36) in a 7:3 ratio. Clinical characteristics were retrospectively analyzed. Serum α-fetoprotein protein (AFP) response was defined as a decline of ≥20% in AFP levels within the initial eight weeks of treatment. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses were used to select relevant variables and construct the nomogram. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to determine the performance of the model. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test was used to compare different risk groups.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months. In the multivariate Cox analysis, the presence of extrahepatic metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-4.27, p < 0.05), white blood cell count (HR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.02-11.88, p < 0.05) and AFP response (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18-0.95, p < 0.05) independently predicted PFS. A nomogram for PFS was established with AUCs of 0.79 and 0.70 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The median PFS of the high- and low-risk subgroups was 3.5 and 11.7 months, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The nomogram could predict PFS in patients with unresectable HCC receiving ICIs treatment and further help decision making in daily clinical practice.

Prognostic value of controlling nutritional status on clinical and survival outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Cancer is a leading cause of death globally. Immunotherapy has shown promise in treating various types of cancer, but its effectiveness varies among patients. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score has been linked to the prognosis of different cancers. However, its predictive value for immunotherapy outcomes is not well understood. Our research represents the pioneering meta-study to examine the prognostic value of the CONUT score on cancer patients treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). A comprehensive literature search was conducted using various databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. The study was conducted until July 28, 2023. This analysis encompassed a comprehensive evaluation of various clinical outcomes, namely overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). 663 patients from 8 studies were included in this study. It showed that cancer patients with high CONUT score had poorer OS (HR: 1.94, 95% CI, 1.52-2.47, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.22, 95% CI, 1.48-3.31, p < 0.001), as well as worse ORR (OR: 0.46, 95% CI, 0.25-0.85, p = 0.013) and DCR (HR: 0.29, 95% CI, 0.14-0.59, p = 0.001). The CONUT score can predict the prognosis of tumor patients treated with ICIs.

Prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory markers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided a new treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, further evaluation is needed for determining biomarkers for the use of ICIs. The present study evaluated the prognostic value of certain nutritional and inflammatory markers in patients with HCC who received ICIs. In the present study, the clinical data of 151 patients with HCC who received ICIs at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were collected. The blood parameters of all patients before treatment were collected to evaluate certain nutritional and inflammatory markers, including the prognostic nutrition index (PNI), nutritional risk index (NRI), geriatric NRI (GNRI), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI). Patients were grouped using the cut-off value calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the relationship between these biomarkers and prognosis was evaluated through survival analysis. Furthermore, the prognostic value of these biomarkers was assessed through multivariate Cox regression analysis and construction of nomograms. Finally, time-ROC curves were plotted to compare the differences in predicting prognosis between the biomarkers. In the preliminary survival analysis, all inflammatory and nutritional markers included in the present study were significantly associated with the prognosis of HCC in patients who received ICIs. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup analysis of patients with different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that GNRI, PNI, BCLC stage and Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS), whereas GNRI, BCLC stage and TNM stage were also significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the time-ROC curves indicated that nutritional indicators had a higher prognostic value in all indexes, especially GNRI. The C-index (95% confidence interval) of the nomograms for predicting the survival probability of patients who received ICIs were 0.801 (0.746-0.877) and 0.823 (0.761-0.898) for PFS and overall OS, respectively, which also showed high accuracy. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that PNI, GNRI, NRI, SII, SIRI and ALI were all related to the efficacy of ICIs in HCC and could serve as non-invasive biomarkers for ICI treatment effectiveness. Moreover, compared with inflammatory markers, nutritional markers had greater predictive ability, with GNRI being the biomarker with the best prognostic value.

Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase in patients with uveal melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition

OBJECTIVE

We performed the meta-analysis to explore the predictive value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in uveal melanoma (UM) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

Eligible articles were obtained through EMBASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library, until March 23, 2023. The clinical outcomes evaluated in this study encompassed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis comprised eight studies with a combined total of 383 patients. The results showed that patients with high LDH levels had noticeably worse OS (HR: 3.445, 95% CI: 2.504-4.740, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.720, 95% CI: 1.429-2.070, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis confirmed that the upper limit of normal was the ideal cut-off value for LDH. In multivariate analysis, we also found that high LDH levels significantly predicted shorter OS (HR: 3.405, 95% CI: 1.827-6.348, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.519, 95% CI: 1.557-4.076, p < 0.001) in UM patients. The sensitivity analysis and publication bias test supported the reliability of our results.

CONCLUSIONS

In UM patients treated with ICIs, the LDH levels were reliable indicators of prognosis.

Objective Response and Progression-Free Survival Contribute to Prolong Overall Survival in Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) is a standard treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to its good antitumor and survival prolongation effects. Post-progression survival (PPS) has been reported to be a great contributor in the treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for unresectable HCC. This study aimed to clarify the significance of progression-free survival (PFS) or PPS of Atez/Bev treatment for HCC.

METHODS

We analyzed the correlations of PFS and PPS with overall survival (OS) in studies of HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev and evaluated the contribution to OS in Atez/Bev treatment with patients at our institutions as clinical practice.

RESULTS

Analysis of 18 studies involving 3,752 patients treated with Atez/Bev found that PPS had a stronger correlation with OS (R2 = 0.872, p < 0.001) than did PFS (R2 = 0.605, p = 0.001). Analysis of 80 patients with unresectable HCC treated with Atez/Bev found that presence of antitumor responses during Atez/Bev was the most significant contributor to OS, and post-progression treatment after Atez/Bev also significantly contribute to OS.

CONCLUSION

The presence of antitumor response with tumor shrinkage during Atez/Bev treatment contributes to good OS through its durable response. Atez/Bev treatment could be considered as first-line treatment for unresectable HCC. However, there is a need for optimal biomarkers for good antitumor response.

Prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic biomarker for gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Objective

Our study represents the first meta-analysis conducted to evaluate the prognostic utility of the baseline prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) who received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar until April 23, 2023, to obtain relevant articles for this study. Our analysis examined several clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

In this analysis, a total of 17 articles with 2883 patients were included. Our pooled results indicated that patients with high PNI levels had longer OS (HR: 0.530, 95% CI: 0.456-0.616, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.740, 95% CI: 0.649-0.844, p < 0.001), as well as higher ORR (OR: 1.622, 95% CI: 1.251-2.103, p < 0.004) and DCR (OR: 1.846, 95% CI: 1.428-2.388, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that PNI cutoff values of 40 to 45 showed greater predictive potential. Subgroup analysis also confirmed that the above findings still hold true in patients with esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and hepatocellular carcinomas.

Conclusion

The PNI were reliable predictors of outcomes in GIC patients treated with ICIs.

Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts

Objective

To identify the risk factors associated with prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) via meta-analysis. And to construct prediction models to aid in the prediction and improvement of prognosis.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for relevant studies from inception to March 29, 2023. After completing literature screening and data extraction, we performed meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis to identify risk factors associated with OS and PFS. Using the pooled hazard ratio value for each risk factor, we constructed prediction models, which were then validated using datasets from 19 centers in Japan and two centers in China, comprising a total of 204 patients.

Results

A total of 47 studies, involving a total of 7649 ICI-treated HCC patients, were included in the meta-analysis. After analyzing 18 risk factors, we identified AFP, ALBI, NLR, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh stage, BCLC stage, tumor number, vascular invasion and combination therapy as predictors for OS prediction model, while AFP, ALBI, NLR, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh stage, BCLC stage, tumor number and vascular invasion were selected as predictors for PFS model. To validate the models, we scored two independent cohorts of patients using both prediction models. Our models demonstrated good performance in these cohorts. In addition, in the pooled cohort of 204 patients, Our models also showed good performance with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.712, 0.753, and 0.822 for the OS prediction model at 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year follow-up points, respectively, and AUC values of 0.575, 0.749 and 0.691 for the PFS prediction model Additionally, the calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves in the pooled cohort all supported the validity of both models.

Conclusion

Based on the meta-analysis, we successfully constructed the OS and PFS prediction models for ICI-treated HCC patients. We also validated the models externally and observed good discrimination and calibration. The model's selected indicators are easily obtainable, making them suitable for further application in clinical practice.