Zebrafish neuromesodermal progenitors undergo a critical state transition in vivo

Neural induction: New insight into the default model and an extended four-step model in vertebrate embryos

Neural induction is a process by which naïve ectodermal cells differentiate into neural progenitor cells through the inhibition of BMP signaling, a condition typically considered the "default" state in vertebrate embryos. Studies in vertebrate embryos indicate that active FGF/MAPK signaling reduces BMP signaling to facilitate neural induction. Consequently, I propose that FGF stimulation/BMP inhibition more accurately characterizes the default model. Initially, the neuroectoderm is instructed to differentiate into anterior forebrain tissue, with cranial signals stabilizing this outcome. Subsequently, a gradient of caudalizing signals converts the neuroectodermal cells into posterior midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord. Furthermore, at the caudal end of the embryo, neuromesodermal progenitor cells are destined to differentiate into both neural progenitor cells and mesodermal cells, aiding in body extension. In light of these observations, I suggest incorporating an additional step, elongation, into the conventional three-step model of neural induction. This updated model encompasses activation, stabilization, transformation, and elongation.

Spinal cord elongation enables proportional regulation of the zebrafish posterior body

Early embryos display a remarkable ability to regulate tissue patterning in response to changes in tissue size. However, it is not clear whether this ability continues into post-gastrulation stages. Here, we performed targeted removal of dorsal progenitors in the zebrafish tailbud using multiphoton ablation. This led to a proportional reduction in the length of the spinal cord and paraxial mesoderm in the tail, revealing a capacity for the regulation of tissue morphogenesis during tail formation. Following analysis of cell proliferation, gene expression, signalling and cell movements, we found no evidence of cell fate switching from mesoderm to neural fate to compensate for neural progenitor loss. Furthermore, tail paraxial mesoderm length is not reduced upon direct removal of an equivalent number of mesoderm progenitors, ruling out the hypothesis that neuromesodermal competent cells enable proportional regulation. Instead, reduction in cell number across the spinal cord reduces both spinal cord and paraxial mesoderm length. We conclude that spinal cord elongation is a driver of paraxial mesoderm elongation in the zebrafish tail and that this can explain proportional regulation upon neural progenitor reduction.

Elongation of the developing spinal cord is driven by Oct4-type transcription factor-mediated regulation of retinoic acid signaling in zebrafish embryos

BACKGROUND

Elongation of the spinal cord is dependent on neural development from neuromesodermal progenitors in the tail bud. We previously showed the involvement of the Oct4-type gene, pou5f3, in this process in zebrafish mainly by dominant-interference gene induction, but, to compensate for the limitation of this transgene approach, mutant analysis was indispensable. pou5f3 involvement in the signaling pathways was another unsolved question.

RESULTS

We examined the phenotypes of pou5f3 mutants and the effects of Pou5f3 activation by the tamoxifen-ERT2 system in the posterior neural tube, together confirming the involvement of pou5f3. The reporter assays using P19 cells implicated tail bud-related transcription factors in pou5f3 expression. Regulation of tail bud development by retinoic acid (RA) signaling was confirmed by treatment of embryos with RA and the synthesis inhibitor, and in vitro reporter assays further showed that RA signaling regulated pou5f3 expression. Importantly, the expression of the RA degradation enzyme gene, cyp26a1, was down-regulated in embryos with disrupted pou5f3 activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The involvement of pou5f3 in spinal cord extension was supported by using mutants and the gain-of-function approach. Our findings further suggest that pou5f3 regulates the RA level, contributing to neurogenesis in the posterior neural tube.

Differentiation is accompanied by a progressive loss in transcriptional memory

BACKGROUND

Cell differentiation requires the integration of two opposite processes, a stabilizing cellular memory, especially at the transcriptional scale, and a burst of gene expression variability which follows the differentiation induction. Therefore, the actual capacity of a cell to undergo phenotypic change during a differentiation process relies upon a modification in this balance which favors change-inducing gene expression variability. However, there are no experimental data providing insight on how fast the transcriptomes of identical cells would diverge on the scale of the very first two cell divisions during the differentiation process.

RESULTS

In order to quantitatively address this question, we developed different experimental methods to recover the transcriptomes of related cells, after one and two divisions, while preserving the information about their lineage at the scale of a single cell division. We analyzed the transcriptomes of related cells from two differentiation biological systems (human CD34+ cells and T2EC chicken primary erythrocytic progenitors) using two different single-cell transcriptomics technologies (scRT-qPCR and scRNA-seq).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified that the gene transcription profiles of differentiating sister cells are more similar to each other than to those of non-related cells of the same type, sharing the same environment and undergoing similar biological processes. More importantly, we observed greater discrepancies between differentiating sister cells than between self-renewing sister cells. Furthermore, a progressive increase in this divergence from first generation to second generation was observed when comparing differentiating cousin cells to self renewing cousin cells. Our results are in favor of a gradual erasure of transcriptional memory during the differentiation process.

From signalling to form: the coordination of neural tube patterning

The development of the vertebrate spinal cord involves the formation of the neural tube and the generation of multiple distinct cell types. The process starts during gastrulation, combining axial elongation with specification of neural cells and the formation of the neuroepithelium. Tissue movements produce the neural tube which is then exposed to signals that provide patterning information to neural progenitors. The intracellular response to these signals, via a gene regulatory network, governs the spatial and temporal differentiation of progenitors into specific cell types, facilitating the assembly of functional neuronal circuits. The interplay between the gene regulatory network, cell movement, and tissue mechanics generates the conserved neural tube pattern observed across species. In this review we offer an overview of the molecular and cellular processes governing the formation and patterning of the neural tube, highlighting how the remarkable complexity and precision of vertebrate nervous system arises. We argue that a multidisciplinary and multiscale understanding of the neural tube development, paired with the study of species-specific strategies, will be crucial to tackle the open questions.

Fate specification is spatially intermingled across planarian stem cells

Regeneration requires mechanisms for producing a wide array of cell types. Neoblasts are stem cells in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea that undergo fate specification to produce over 125 adult cell types. Fate specification in neoblasts can be regulated through expression of fate-specific transcription factors. We utilize multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) and whole-mount FISH to characterize fate choice distribution of stem cells within planarians. Fate choices are often made distant from target tissues and in a highly intermingled manner, with neighboring neoblasts frequently making divergent fate choices for tissues of different location and function. We propose that pattern formation is driven primarily by the migratory assortment of progenitors from mixed and spatially distributed fate-specified stem cells and that fate choice involves stem-cell intrinsic processes.

The Role of Posterior Neural Plate-Derived Presomitic Mesoderm (PSM) in Trunk and Tail Muscle Formation and Axis Elongation

Elongation of the posterior body axis is distinct from that of the anterior trunk and head. Early drivers of posterior elongation are the neural plate/tube and notochord, later followed by the presomitic mesoderm (PSM), together with the neural tube and notochord. In axolotl, posterior neural plate-derived PSM is pushed posteriorly by convergence and extension of the neural plate. The PSM does not go through the blastopore but turns anteriorly to join the gastrulated paraxial mesoderm. To gain a deeper understanding of the process of axial elongation, a detailed characterization of PSM morphogenesis, which precedes somite formation, and of other tissues (such as the epidermis, lateral plate mesoderm and endoderm) is needed. We investigated these issues with specific tissue labelling techniques (DiI injections and GFP⁺ tissue grafting) in combination with optical tissue clearing and 3D reconstructions. We defined a spatiotemporal order of PSM morphogenesis that is characterized by changes in collective cell behaviour. The PSM forms a cohesive tissue strand and largely retains this cohesiveness even after epidermis removal. We show that during embryogenesis, the PSM, as well as the lateral plate and endoderm move anteriorly, while the net movement of the axis is posterior.