1
|
Williamson BD, Wu L, Huang Y, Hudson A, Gilbert PB. Predicting neutralization susceptibility to combination HIV-1 monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibody regimens. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0310042. [PMID: 39240995 PMCID: PMC11379218 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Combination monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are currently being developed for preventing HIV-1 acquisition. Recent work has focused on predicting in vitro neutralization potency of both individual bnAbs and combination regimens against HIV-1 pseudoviruses using Env sequence features. To predict in vitro combination regimen neutralization potency against a given HIV-1 pseudovirus, previous approaches have applied mathematical models to combine individual-bnAb neutralization and have predicted this combined neutralization value; we call this the combine-then-predict (CP) approach. However, prediction performance for some individual bnAbs has exceeded that for the combination, leading to another possibility: combining the individual-bnAb predicted values and using these to predict combination regimen neutralization; we call this the predict-then-combine (PC) approach. We explore both approaches in both simulated data and data from the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Compile, Neutralize, and Tally NAb Panels repository. The CP approach is superior to the PC approach when the neutralization outcome of interest is binary (e.g., neutralization susceptibility, defined as inhibitory 80% concentration < 1 μg/mL). For continuous outcomes, the CP approach performs nearly as well as the PC approach when the individual-bnAb prediction algorithms have strong performance, and is superior to the PC approach when the individual-bnAb prediction algorithms have poor performance. This knowledge may be used when building prediction models for novel antibody combinations in the absence of in vitro neutralization data for the antibody combination; this, in turn, will aid in the evaluation and down-selection of these antibody combinations into prevention efficacy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D. Williamson
- Biostatistics Division, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
| | - Liana Wu
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
| | - Yunda Huang
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
| | - Aaron Hudson
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
| | - Peter B. Gilbert
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States of Amerrica
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Williamson BD, Wu L, Huang Y, Hudson A, Gilbert PB. Predicting neutralization susceptibility to combination HIV-1 monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibody regimens. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.12.14.571616. [PMID: 38168308 PMCID: PMC10760080 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.14.571616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Combination monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are currently being developed for preventing HIV-1 infection. Recent work has focused on predicting in vitro neutralization potency of both individual bnAbs and combination regimens against HIV-1 pseudoviruses using Env sequence features. To predict in vitro combination regimen neutralization potency against a given HIV-1 pseudovirus, previous approaches have applied mathematical models to combine individual-bnAb neutralization and have predicted this combined neutralization value; we call this the combine-then-predict (CP) approach. However, prediction performance for some individual bnAbs has exceeded that for the combination, leading to another possibility: combining the individual-bnAb predicted values and using these to predict combination regimen neutralization; we call this the predict-then-combine (PC) approach. We explore both approaches in both simulated data and data from the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Compile, Neutralize, and Tally NAb Panels repository. The CP approach is superior to the PC approach when the neutralization outcome of interest is binary (e.g., neutralization susceptibility, defined as inhibitory concentration < 1 μg/mL. For continuous outcomes, the CP approach performs at least as well as the PC approach, and is superior to the PC approach when the individual-bnAb prediction algorithms have poor performance. This knowledge may be used when building prediction models for novel antibody combinations in the absence of in vitro neutralization data for the antibody combination; this, in turn, will aid in the evaluation and down-selection of these antibody combinations into prevention efficacy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D. Williamson
- Biostatistics Division, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Liana Wu
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yunda Huang
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Aaron Hudson
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter B. Gilbert
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|