Clinical response rates, placebo response rates, and significantly associated covariates are dependent on choice of outcome measure in hidradenitis suppurativa: A post hoc analysis of PIONEER 1 and 2 individual patient data

Secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa based on prior biologic exposure: an efficacy and safety analysis from the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with a substantial disease burden. Secukinumab has previously been reported to have sustained efficacy with a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. It is unknown whether prior biologic exposure affects the efficacy and safety of secukinumab.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS based on prior exposure to -biologics.

METHODS

This was an analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Patients were randomized at baseline to receive secukinumab every 2 (SECQ2W) or 4 weeks (SECQ4W), or placebo for 16 weeks. After week 16, patients on the SECQ2W and SECQ4W schedules remained on the same treatment regimen, while patients randomized to placebo were switched to either SECQ2W or SECQ4W up to week 52. Assessments based on prior exposure to biologics included Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, flare rates, HS-related pain [numerical rating scale 30 (NRS30)], 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4-55), Dermatology Life Quality Index, EuroQol-5D and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 1084 patients were randomized in the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials and included in this analysis; 255 (23.5%) were biologic-experienced [SECQ2W (n = 80); SECQ4W (n = 81); placebo (n = 94)] and 829 (76.5%) were biologic-naïve [SECQ2W (n = 281); SECQ4W (n = 279); placebo (n = 269)]. At week 16, responses were more efficacious for secukinumab than for placebo with regard to HiSCR in patients who were biologic-experienced {SECQ2W 37.0% [odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-3.08]; SECQ4W 38.8% [OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.86-3.22]; placebo 27.3%} and biologic-naïve [SECQ2W 45.6% (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.15-2.33); SECQ4W 45.4% (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.29); placebo 34.2%]. Similar results were observed for AN count, NRS30 and IHS4-55. The higher response seen at week 16 with secukinumab was sustained, with a trend toward improvement over time, through to week 52 in both subgroups. Additional efficacy was observed for quality-of-life assessments, and no differences in safety between subgroups were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of prior biologic exposure, secukinumab was efficacious in improving the signs and symptoms of HS. This finding positions secukinumab as the first option in patients who are biologic-naïve, as well as in patients who have previously been treated with other biologic therapy, based on individual patient needs.

Orismilast for the treatment of mild to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: Week 16 data from OSIRIS, a Phase 2a, open-label, single-centre, single-arm, dose-finding clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a disease with an unmet need for treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To examine tolerability, safety and efficacy of oral phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitior orismilast 10-40 mg twice daily (BID) in HS.

METHODS

A Phase 2a, single-arm, single-centre, open-label, 16-week trial in HS patients. Adjustments in maximal dose and titration were allowed, to improve tolerability, dividing the study population in two groups who completed and discontinued 16 weeks of treatment. Descriptive statistics were applied to efficacy data from patients who completed treatment and patients who discontinued treatment prematurely. A last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) approach was used for patients who discontinued treatment. The primary endpoint was percent change in the total number of abscesses and nodules (AN-count) at Week 16, with the HS Clinical Response with a 50% reduction in the AN-count (HiSCR50) as key secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients included, 9 completed 16 weeks of treatment and 11 discontinued treatment prematurely. The mean AN-count was reduced with 33.1% in patients who completed treatment and with 12.0% in patients who discontinued. HiSCR50 was achieved by 67.0% and 27.0% of patients who completed and discontinued treatment, respectively. Most adverse events were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral orismilast demonstrated a dose-dependent tolerability, with mild to moderate adverse effects. Further, the results of this exploratory trial indicate that orismilast may lead to clinical improvements in HS. However, larger trials with tolerable dose ranges are warranted. The Trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (UNI50007201) and EudraCT.ema.europa.eu (2021-000049-42).

Alterations to the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Serum Proteome with Spleen Tyrosine Kinase Antagonism: Proteomic Results from a Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a disease in great need of novel therapies. Given the heterogeneous nature of the disease and the variable response to therapies, biomarkers are essential to predict response to therapies and increase our understanding of disease pathogenesis. Our recent phase 2 clinical trial of spleen tyrosine kinase antagonism using fostamatinib in hidradenitis suppurativa demonstrated a 75% clinical response, with the greatest benefit in individuals with elevated serum inflammation and IgG. In this study, we present results of an in-depth serum proteomic analysis in this patient cohort identifying downregulation of IL-12B as well as B-cell-associated proteins CCL19 and CCL20 and IFN-γ-mediated proteins CXCL10 and CX3CL1. Clinical responders demonstrated greater reduction in serum IL-17A, IL-6, IL-8, and CX3CL1 compared with clinical nonresponders. Baseline levels of CCL28 were associated with clinical response to fostamatinib therapy at week 12. Overall, this suggests that fostamatinib, by targeting B-cell receptor and Fc receptor activity in B cells, monocytes, and macrophages, has a significant molecular impact on the inflammatory serum proteome of hidradenitis suppurativa. In addition, potential therapeutic biomarkers may aid in patient selection for targeted therapy.

Adalimumab in conjunction with surgery compared with adalimumab monotherapy for hidradenitis suppurativa: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab, the only biologic registered for hidradenitis suppurativa, shows clinical response in up to 60% of patients, leaving many patients in need for other treatment options such as surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab combined with surgery vs adalimumab monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa.

METHODS

A pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial was performed from August 2018 to July 2022. Primary outcome was the difference in mean International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System reduction after 12 months of treatment with the difference in mean Dermatology Life Quality Index reduction as a key secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included per arm. The mean International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System at baseline was 23.9 ± 10.7 in the surgery group and 20.9 ± 16.4, in the monotherapy group. After 12 months of treatment the surgery group had a significantly greater reduction in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System compared with the monotherapy group (-19.1 ± 11.3 vs -7.8 ± 11.8, P < .001). Moreover, the surgery group showed a greater reduction in Dermatology Life Quality Index after treatment compared with the monotherapy group (-8.2 ± 6.2 vs -4 ± 7.7, P = .02).

LIMITATIONS

The study follow-up was too short to assess surgical recurrence rates.

DISCUSSION

Combining adalimumab with surgery resulted in greater clinical effectiveness and improved quality of life after 12 months in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa.

A proof-of-concept open-label clinical trial of spleen tyrosine kinase antagonism using fostamatinib in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an autoinflammatory disorder of keratinization with a prominence of B cells and plasma cells. Fostamatinib is a spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting B cells and plasma cells.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety, tolerability, and clinical response at week 4 and week 12 of fostamatinib in moderate-to-severe HS.

METHODS

Twenty participants were administered fostamatinib 100 mg twice a day for 4 weeks, escalating to 150 mg twice a day thereafter until week 12. Participants were assessed for adverse events and clinical response assessed by HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response Score) and IHS4 (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score) as well as other outcomes including DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index), visual analog scale, and physician global assessment.

RESULTS

All 20 participants completed the week 4 and week 12 endpoints. Fostamatinib was well tolerated in this cohort with no grade 2/3 adverse events reported. A total of 85% achieved HiSCR at week 4 and 85% at week 12. The greatest reduction in disease activity was seen at weeks 4/5 with worsening in a proportion of patients thereafter. Significant improvements were seen in pain, itch, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Fostamatinib was well tolerated in this HS cohort with no serious adverse events and improvement in clinical outcomes. Targeting B cells/plasma cells may be a viable therapeutic strategy in HS and requires further exploration.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A 52-week analysis of a postmarketing surveillance study in Japan

Adalimumab is a human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor-α that was approved in Japan for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic recurrent inflammatory skin disease. We report the results of the final analysis of the postmarketing surveillance (PMS) study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03894956), which evaluated the 52-week safety and efficacy of adalimumab for HS treatment in real-world clinical practice in Japan. This multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study (March 2019 to May 2021) included patients with HS treated with subcutaneous adalimumab at doses following the package insert. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoints were effectiveness, including HS clinical response (HiSCR), C-reactive protein (CRP), skin pain, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Of the 84 patients registered at 65 sites, 83 patients were included in the analyses. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported by 10 (12.0%) patients; two patients reported a serious ADR, including one patient with serious infection. Other safety events of special interest reported were liver disorder and dermatitis psoriasiform (one patient each). Almost all patients with ADRs were recovering or had recovered, except for one patient who experienced a serious ADR of liver disorder and died. At 12 weeks, 55.4% of patients achieved HiSCR; this increased to 60.5% and 62.8% at 24 and 52 weeks of adalimumab treatment, respectively. Significant reductions from baseline in CRP (P < 0.05), skin pain (P < 0.0001), and DLQI (P < 0.0001) were observed at all time points. The results from this PMS study demonstrated that long-term adalimumab treatment is well tolerated and effective in patients with HS in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

Employing Adalimumab in Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Real-Life Multicenter Data from the Czech Republic

Adalimumab is the only approved biologic treatment for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa, nonetheless, long-term data from real-life setting are still limited. The objective of this observational multicenter study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and drug survival of adalimumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa included in the BIOREP registry. A total of 299 patients who initiated adalimumab therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa from 2011 to November 2021 were included. The Dermatology-Life-Quality-Index (DLQI), pain scale, the number of abscesses, inflammatory nodules and draining tunnels, and International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) were recorded in the 0th, 3rd, and 6th months; then every 6 months during the ongoing adalimumab treatment. Studied patients underwent treatment for up to 48 months, with the average duration of treatment lasting 2.3 years. The mean age of the patients was 44.9 years, 79% were smokers or ex-smokers, 54.8% were obese, and 26.4% were overweight, the mean BMI was 30.8. The mean time from diagnosis to initiation adalimumab therapy was 9.1 years. The number of patients with severe IHS4 dropped from the initial 249 (83.3%) to 65 (30.1%) after 12 months and this trend was maintained up to the 48th month. A decreasing number of inflammatory lesions were rapid and sustained and correlated to the improvement of patients’ quality of life, the mean DLQI score dropped from 17.6 to 8.5 after 3 months and to 5, 7 after 48 months. No unexpected risk signals were observed. Our long-term study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in a real-life setting.

Surgical Procedural Definitions for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Developed by Expert Delphi Consensus

Importance

Various surgical approaches for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have been described in the literature, but the nomenclature is inconsistent. Excisions have been described as wide, local, radical, and regional with variable descriptions of margins. Deroofing procedures have been described with various approaches though descriptions of the approach are generally more uniform. No international consensus has been formed to globally standardize terminology for HS surgical procedures. Lack of such agreement may contribute to misunderstanding or misclassification in HS procedural research studies and impair clear communication among clinicians or between clinicians and patients.

Objective

To create a set of standard definitions for HS surgical procedures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This consensus agreement study was conducted from January to May 2021 using the modified Delphi consensus method to reach agreement among a group of international HS experts regarding standardized definitions for an initial set of HS surgical terms, including "incision and drainage," "deroofing/unroofing," "excision," "lesional excision," and "regional excision," ultimately expanded to 10 terms. Provisional definitions were drafted based on existing literature and discussion among an expert 8-member steering committee. Online surveys were disseminated to members of the HS Foundation, direct contacts of the expert panel, and the HSPlace listserv to reach physicians with considerable experience with HS surgery. Consensus was defined as greater than 70% agreement to accept a definition.

Results

In the first and second modified Delphi round, 50 and 33 experts participated, respectively. Ten surgical procedural terms and definitions reached consensus with greater than 80% agreement. Overall, the term "local" excision was abandoned and replaced with the descriptors "lesional" or "regional" excision. Of note, "regional" replaced the terms "wide" and "radical" excision. Furthermore, modifiers such as "partial" vs "complete" should also be included when describing surgical procedures. A combination of these terms helped formulate the final glossary of HS surgical procedural definitions.

Conclusion and Relevance

An international group of HS experts agreed on a set of definitions describing surgical procedures frequently used by clinicians and in the literature. The standardization and application of such definitions are vital to allow for accurate communication, reporting consistency, and uniform data collection and study design in the future.

B-cell and complement signature in severe hidradenitis suppurativa that does not respond to adalimumab

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with significant morbidity. The pathogenesis remains incompletely understood although immune dysregulation plays an important role. It is challenging to treat and approximately 50% of patients respond clinically to adalimumab, the only licensed treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine differences between lesional and nonlesional HS skin at baseline using bulk RNA sequencing, and to compare the transcriptome in the skin before and after 12 weeks of treatment with adalimumab. To examine transcriptomic differences between adalimumab responders and nonresponders using Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response and the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4); and to compare transcriptomic differences based on disease severity (Hurley stage and IHS4).

METHODS

We completed bulk RNA sequencing on lesional and nonlesional skin samples of patients before and after 12 weeks of treatment with adalimumab.

RESULTS

Baseline differentially expressed genes and pathways between lesional and nonlesional skin highlighted chemokines and antimicrobial peptides produced by keratinocytes; B-cell function; T-cell-receptor, interleukin-17 and nuclear factor-κB signalling; and T-helper-cell differentiation. Transcriptomic differences were identified in lesional skin at baseline, between subsequent responders and nonresponders. Patients with severe HS who did not respond to adalimumab had enriched complement and B-cell activation pathways at baseline. In addition, logistic regression identified CCL28 in baseline lesional HS skin as a potential biomarker of treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

This highlights the potential for targeting B-cell and complement pathways in HS treatment and the potential of stratifying patients at baseline to the most suitable treatment based on the skin transcriptome. CCL28 has not previously been identified in HS skin and has potential clinical relevance due to its antimicrobial function and homing of B and T cells at epithelial surfaces. Our results provide data to inform future translational and clinical studies on therapeutics in HS.

IL-17RA blockade by brodalumab decreases inflammatory pathways in hidradenitis suppurativa skin and serum

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease with dysregulation of the IL-17 axis. Recently we reported clinical benefit of brodalumab, a human anti-IL-17 receptor A (IL-17RA) monoclonal antibody, in moderate-to-severe HS.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the molecular response to brodalumab in HS skin and serum, and to identify biomarkers of treatment response.

METHODS

Ten participants that received 210 mg/1.5mL brodalumab subcutaneously at week 0, 1, 2, 4 and every 2 weeks after were included in this molecular profiling study (NCT03960268). RNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry of nonlesional, perilesional and lesional HS skin biopsies, and Olink high throughput proteomics of serum at baseline, week 4 and week 12 were assessed.

RESULTS

At week 12, brodalumab led to a decrease of overall inflammation, and improvement of psoriasis-, keratinocyte- and neutrophil-related pathways. Despite perilesional and lesional skin having no differentially expressed genes at baseline, treatment response was best assessed in perilesional skin. In serum, brodalumab treatment decreased pathways involved in neutrophil inflammation. Patients with higher baseline expression of neutrophil-associated Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) in the skin and IL-17A in the serum demonstrated greater decreases of HS-related inflammatory cytokines as measured in skin biopsies at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-17RA inhibition by brodalumab impacts several pathogenic inflammatory axes in HS. Perilesional skin provides a valid and robust assessment of treatment response. Expression of LCN2 in skin and IL-17A in serum may be used as biomarkers to stratify patients that may have a superior molecular response to brodalumab =.

Identification of Biomarkers and Critical Evaluation of Biomarker Validation in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review

Importance

The identification and validation of biomarkers in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has potential to improve the understanding and management of this chronic, burdensome disease.

Objective

To systematically identify all known HS biomarkers, categorize them by biomarker type, and critically evaluate their validity according to established criteria.

Evidence Review

Eligibility criteria for this review (PROSPERO Registration 230830) included randomized clinical trials, uncontrolled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and other observational studies with no restrictions of patient age, sex, race or ethnicity, or language of publication up until December 31, 2020. All articles were categorized into biomarker type, defined using the US Food and Drug Administration Biomarkers, Endpoints, and other Tools (BEST) glossary. Assessment of each identified biomarker was undertaken in line with the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines for the validation of proposed biomarkers. Assessment of the strength of overall data regarding individual biomarkers was undertaken using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

Findings

A total of 3953 nonduplicate articles were screened, of which 1429 articles were retrieved based on the include/exclusion criteria applied. After full-text screen and data extraction, 106 articles were included in this review. The evidence of strength of 6 categories of biomarkers (susceptibility/risk, diagnostic, monitoring, predictive, prognostic, and pharmacodynamic/response biomarkers) was assessed using GRADE criteria. A total of 48 biomarkers were identified with a minimum GRADE rating of moderate. Only 1 diagnostic (serum IL-2R), 1 monitoring (dermal Doppler vascularity), and 2 predictive biomarkers (epithelialized tunnels and positive family history of HS) achieved a GRADE rating of high. None of the identified biomarkers had sufficient clinical validity to be recommended for routine use in the clinical setting.

Conclusions and Relevance

Major barriers to the identification, validation, and introduction of routine biomarkers in the management of HS include lack of independent biomarker validation studies (especially assumption-free "omics"-based techniques); insufficient assessment of collinearity between identified or proposed biomarkers; and a lack of routine integration of biomarkers into the structure of clinical trials. International consensus among researchers, clinicians, and pharmaceutical stakeholders is required to standardize goals and methods and encourage biomarker integration into future HS clinical trials. This systematic review presents a number of priorities for near-term future research to overcome such barriers and limitations of biomarkers in HS.

Janus kinase 1 inhibitor INCB054707 for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: results from two phase 2 studies

Background

Janus kinase (JAK)‐mediated cytokine signalling contributes to local and systemic inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

Objectives

To describe the safety and efficacy results from two multicentre phase II trials of the JAK1 inhibitor INCB054707 in patients with moderate‐to‐severe HS.

Methods

Patients received open‐label INCB054707 15 mg once daily (QD; Study 1) or were randomized to INCB054707 30, 60 or 90 mg QD or placebo (3 : 1 within each cohort; Study 2) for 8 weeks. Eligible patients were aged 18–75 years and had moderate‐to‐severe HS (Hurley stage II/III disease), lesions present in at least two anatomical locations, and a total abscess and inflammatory nodule count ≥ 3. The primary endpoint for both studies was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) and other efficacy measures.

Results

Ten patients were enrolled in Study 1 (15 mg INCB054707) and 35 in Study 2 (INCB054707: 30 mg, n = 9; 60 mg, n = 9; 90 mg, n = 8; placebo, n = 9). Overall, 70% of patients in Study 1 and 81% of patients receiving INCB054707 in Study 2 experienced at least one treatment‐emergent adverse event; 30% and 42% of patients, respectively, had at least one treatment‐related adverse event. Among the evaluable patients, three (43%) in Study 1 and 17 (65% overall: 30 mg, 56%; 60 mg, 56%; 90 mg, 88%) receiving INCB054707 vs. 4 patients (57%) receiving placebo in Study 2 achieved HiSCR at week 8.

Conclusions

INCB054707 was well tolerated, with responses observed in patients with moderate‐to‐severe HS. The safety and efficacy findings from these studies demonstrate proof of concept for JAK1 inhibition in HS. The studies are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03569371 and NCT03607487).

Financial burden and impact of atopic dermatitis out-of-pocket healthcare expenses among black individuals in the United States

Black race is associated with increased atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and healthcare resource utilization. However, the burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses among black individuals with AD is not well understood. We sought to characterize the categories and impact of OOP healthcare expenses associated with AD management among black individuals. A 25-question voluntary online survey was administered to National Eczema Association members (N = 113,502). Inclusion criteria (US residents age ≥ 18 years; self-report of AD or primary caregivers of individuals with AD) was met by 77.3% (1118/1447) of respondents. Black individuals with AD were younger, had lower household income, Medicaid, urban residence, poor AD control and frequent skin infections (P ≤ 0.02). Blacks vs. non-blacks reported more OOP costs for prescription medications covered (74.2% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.04) and not covered (65.1% vs. 46.5%, P = 0.0004) by insurance, emergency room visits (22.1% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.005), and outpatient laboratory testing (33.3% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.01). Black race was associated with increased household financial impact from OOP expenses (P = 0.0009), and predictors of financial impact included minimally controlled AD (adjusted OR [95% CI] 13.88 [1.63-117.96], P = 0.02), systemic therapy (4.34 [1.63-11.54], 0.003), > $200 monthly OOP expenses (14.28 [3.42-59.60], P = 0.0003), and Medicaid (4.02 [1.15-14.07], P = 0.03). Blacks with Medicaid had higher odds of harmful financial impact (3.32 [1.77-6.24], P = 0.0002) than those of black race (1.81 [1.04-3.15], P = 0.04) or with Medicaid (1.39 [1.02-1.88], P = 0.04) alone. Black race is associated with increased OOP costs for AD and significant household financial impact. Targeted interventions are needed to address financial disparities in AD.

Metabolic syndrome and hidradenitis suppurativa: epidemiological, molecular, and therapeutic aspects

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, suppurative condition of the pilosebaceous unit. Patients suffering from HS demonstrate a molecular profile in keeping with a state of systemic inflammation and are often found to fit the criteria for a diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (MetS). In this paper, we review the literature with regards to established data on the prevalence of MetS in HS patients and revise the odds ratio of comorbid disease. Furthermore, we attempt to draw parallels between inflammatory pathways in HS and MetS and evaluate how convergences may explain the risk of comorbid disease, necessitating the need for multidisciplinary care.

Quantifying the natural variation in lesion counts over time in untreated hidradenitis suppurativa: Implications for outcome measures and trial design

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) demonstrates high placebo response rates in clinical trials, possibly due to the natural variability of the disease. No quantification of variability in lesion counts of untreated disease has been undertaken.

Objective

To quantify the variability of untreated HS.

Methods

Deidentified individual patient data from the placebo arms of PIONEER studies were analyzed, and measurements of within-subject coefficients of variation were examined. Variability was stratified by disease-associated variables (Hurley stage, BMI, sex, smoking, family history) and body site.

Results

Analysis of within-subject coefficients of variation demonstrated that half of the participants had a middle spread [difference between 75^th and 25^th percentiles of the subject's abscess and nodule counts] greater than 33% and 40% of their median abscess and nodule counts, and 25% of the subjects had a middle spread greater than 70% and 78% of their median abscess and nodule counts in PIONEER I and II, respectively. Hurley stage 2 participants had significantly greater within-subject variation than Hurley stage 3 patients. Variation was greater in the axillary and groin regions than in other anatomical locations.

Limitations

Limitations include the use of precollected clinical trial data.

Conclusion

The within-subject variability of the lesion counts in untreated HS was greater than previously appreciated. This has profound effects on outcome measures and the conduct of future clinical trials of HS.

Real-world effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: the 1-year SOLACE study

BACKGROUND

Long-term, real-word data are needed to help manage patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) through this recurrent, painful and debilitating disease.

OBJECTIVES

To primarily measure real-world effectiveness of adalimumab in HS and to secondarily observe clinical course of HS in the light of patients' response.

METHODS

In SOLACE, adults with moderate-to-severe HS in need for change in ongoing therapy were treated with adalimumab for up to 52 weeks as per physician's medical practice. Treatment effectiveness was measured by Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR). Inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining fistulas were counted, Hurley stage was assessed, and disease severity was rated using the International HS Severity Scoring System (IHS4). A post hoc analysis further explored the HiSCR response by abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at baseline (low, medium and high) and gender. Spontaneously reported safety events were collected.

RESULTS

From 23 Canadian centres, 69% of the 138 patients achieved HiSCR at week 24, which increased to 82% and 75% at week 52 in patients with medium and high AN counts, respectively. Gender (4 times the odds for female) and age at HS onset (5% decrease with each additional year) had an effect on achieving HiSCR. Treatment with adalimumab led to an important decrease in number of lesions in responders, with most gains observed in inflammatory nodules, more frequently in the lower body area of patients in the high AN count group. The IHS4 scores of responders were substantially lowered, with a larger decrease in patients of the high AN count group. No new safety signal was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of adalimumab was maintained during this 1-year period, and an optimal gain was documented for patients with medium and high AN counts. These real-world data support a prompt treatment of HS patients and the use of IHS4 to monitor treatment.

Treatment Outcomes of IL-17 Inhibitors in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review

The IL-17 pathway is a potential therapeutic target shown to be implicated in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), however, it remains unclear whether evidence from mechanistic studies may translate into clinical practice. This systematic review summarizes available treatment outcomes of IL-17 inhibitors in patients with HS. Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov were comprehensively searched on February 26, 2021 to include 16 original studies representing 128 patients with HS (mean age: 36.5 years; age range: 21-47 years; male: 50.0%). Treatment outcomes were reported for the following biologics: secukinumab (n = 105), brodalumab (n = 22), and ixekizumab (n = 1). Patients were classified as responders or non-responders according to achievement of a positive response/improvement based on criteria established for each included study. For secukinumab 57.1% (n = 60/105) of patients were responders in a mean response period of 16.2 weeks and 42.9% (n = 45/105) were non-responders; for brodalumab, 100.0% (n = 22/22) of patients were responders within 4.4 weeks; and the one patient treated with ixekizumab was a responder within 10 weeks. In conclusion, IL-17 inhibitors may serve as an effective therapeutic target in approximately two-thirds of patients with HS and can be considered in those who are refractory to other treatment modalities. We also stress the importance of consistent outcome measures to enhance evidence synthesis, decrease reporting bias, provide potential for future meta-analysis, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes for patients with HS.

Clinical Implementation of Biologics and Small Molecules in the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, auto-inflammatory skin disease originating from the hair follicles. The typical inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining sinus tracts (tunnels) are characterized by a massive influx of neutrophils, macrophages, B-cells, plasma cells, T helper (Th)1, Th17 cells and upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α. Over the last decades, several clinical trials evaluated the clinical efficacy of different biologics targeting these pro-inflammatory cytokines, in particular TNF-α and IL-1. However, adalimumab is still the only registered drug for HS. This review discusses biologics and small molecules with high level of evidence for their clinical application, provides guidance on when and how to use these biologics and small molecules in clinical practice, and elaborates on the combination with medical and surgical treatment options beyond the current guidelines. Furthermore this review provides an overview of potential biologics and small molecules currently under investigation for novel targets in HS such as IL-36, C5a, Janus kinase family members, CD-40, LTA4 and CXCR1/2.

Flares as dynamic predictive factor of response to adalimumab in hidradenitis suppurativa, real-life data

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is characterized by periodic worsening of both clinical manifestations and symptoms. The aim was to investigate the role of flare outbreak as a possible predictive factor of response to Adalimumab.

METHODS

115 HS patients in treatment with adalimumab, with moderate-severe HS, ≥3 abscesses and inflammatory-nodules (ANs) from 5 Italian centers were included in this retrospective analysis. The information about gender, ages at onset/baseline, therapeutic delay, family history, body mass index, smoking, comorbidities, phenotypes, body areas, severity indexes at baseline was collected. Baseline characteristics, total number and timeline of flares were analysed by regression and survival analysis with Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR).

RESULTS

During the observational period, 80.9% of patients developed flares, detecting 252 flares. Univariate model identified five factors associated with the absence of response: age (p-value=0.020), comorbidities (p-value=0.030), genital-perineal involvement (pvalue= 0.004), no response at week-12 (p-value=0.027), and flares outbreak (p-value=0.010). Joint analysis of recurrent and terminal events showed a positive correlation between flare recurrence and no-response (p-value<0.001). Among the identified variables associated with poor response to the therapy: occurrence of a flare before week-12 was the one with the highest risk of no response (p-value<0.001). The limitations are: study's retrospective design, limited number of patients, absence either of a consensus about flare definition, placebo control group or standard therapy of flares during adalimumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of a "dynamic" variable, as flares evaluation together with an appropriate clinical baseline assessment can be a useful approach to predict the middle-long-term response to adalimumab.

The Impact of Body Mass Index Upon the Efficacy of Adalimumab in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Elevated BMI in Hidradenitis Suppurativa is associated with decreased response to Adalimumab therapy. BMI is proposed to segregate distinct disease subtypes. It remains unresolved whether a threshold BMI exists above which increased dosages may provide clinical benefit. Individual patient data from 578 PIONEER Phase 3 participants were analyzed. Descriptive, multivariable regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to assess the relationship between BMI and clinical outcome measures using R v3.5.3. Participants in the overweight and obese BMI category had reduced odds (58 and 67%, respectively) of achieving HiSCR [OR = 0.42 (95%CI −0.19, 0.91) p = 0.03], [OR = 0.33 (95%CI 0.16, 0.67) p = 0.002] compared to participants with BMI < 25. Reduction in AN count and IHS4 score was not significantly associated. ROC analysis did not reveal any cut off value predictive of treatment outcome. No correlation between BMI and baseline disease activity or covariate interactions were identified. These findings suggest BMI is a significant covariate in the setting of lower baseline disease activity, supporting the concept of disease heterogeneity and differential therapeutic response to Adalimumab.

Epithelialized tunnels are a source of inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa, is a chronic, painful, and burdensome inflammatory disease manifesting in nodules and abscesses, with progression to chronically draining tunnels in later-stage disease.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether HS tunnels are immunologically active participants in disease activity.

METHODS

Skin biopsy specimens were obtained by using ultrasound guidance in untreated patients with HS and those enrolled in an open-label study of brodalumab (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03960268) for patients with moderate-to-severe HS.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry of HS biopsy specimens demonstrated that the epithelialized HS tunnels recapitulate the psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia morphology of the overlying epidermis, displaying molecular inflammation, including S100A7 (psoriasin) positivity, as well as features of epidermal skin, including loricrin, filaggrin, lipocalin-2, and Melan-A positive cells. Tunnels were associated with increased infiltration of T cells, dendritic cells, and neutrophils; formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, and increased expression of psoriasiform proinflammatory cytokines. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering demonstrated a separation of HS samples based on the presence or absence of tunnels. Tunnels isolated by microdissection had higher levels of epithelium-derived inflammatory cytokines compared with the overlying epidermis and healthy controls. Clinically, the size and draining of the tunnels were decreased with treatment with the IL-17RA antagonist brodalumab.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that tunnels are a source of inflammation in HS.

High inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa extends to perilesional skin and can be subdivided by lipocalin-2 expression

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease presenting with diverse manifestations ranging from nodules and abscesses to draining tunnels. Whether the underlying inflammation from lesions extends to relatively healthy-appearing adjacent perilesional and distant nonlesional skin has not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize lesional, perilesional, and nonlesional skin in patients with HS.

METHODS

Skin biopsy samples were collected under ultrasound guidance from patients with active, untreated moderate-to-severe HS. Site-matched control biopsy samples from healthy volunteers were used for comparison.

RESULTS

RNA sequencing demonstrated that HS skin clustered separately from healthy control skin, with perilesional and lesion skin clustering together and away from nonlesional skin. Immunohistochemistry analysis identified psoriasiform hyperplasia with keratin 16 positivity in both perilesional and lesional skin, with comparable levels of CD3⁺, CD11c⁺, and neutrophil elastase-positive cellular infiltration. There was a marked upregulation of IL-17 signaling in perilesional and lesional skin. HS samples clustered on the basis of expression of lipocalin-2 (LCN2), with samples characterized by high LCN2 expression in the skin exhibiting a differing transcriptomic profile with significantly higher overall inflammation than that of skin characterized by low LCN2 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Perilesional HS skin has a transcriptomic and molecular profile comparable to that of lesional skin. HS can be grouped into 2 distinct subtypes based on molecular levels of LCN2 in the skin, with the LCN2-high subtype exhibiting an overall higher inflammatory burden and an upregulation of targetable cytokines. To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize a unique HS subtype (and a potential endotype) that may guide future therapeutic targets.

Factors related to the onset and recurrence of flares in hidradenitis suppurativa patients treated with adalimumab

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is characterized by periodic worsening of symptoms. However, clinical parameters associated with flare are still to be established. The aim was too investigate factors associated with flare outbreak in HS patients in treatment with adalimumab.

METHODS

Moderate-severe HS patients were included in this retrospective analysis. In total, 115 HS patients treated with adalimumab from 5 Italian centers were reviewed. Gender, ages at onset/baseline, therapeutic delay, family history, body mass index, smoking, comorbidities, phenotypes, body areas involved, Hurley stage, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Visual Analogue Scale for pain (pain-VAS) were collected at baseline. Flares were modelled with baseline features using univariate and multivariate Coxregression. The factors significantly correlated with flares in the univariate model were analyzed using a recurrent event survival analysis (Andersen-Gill model) to assess the relation between them and flares recurrence.

RESULTS

During the observation period 80.9% of patients developed flares, detecting 252 flares, overall. A univariate model identified five risk factors associated with the outbreak of flares: age, therapeutic delay, groin involvement, Hurley III, higher IHS4, whereas, from multivariate model, only IHS4 resulted to be significantly correlated. Additionally, flares were positively associated with higher DLQI and pain-VAS. Finally, the Andersen-Gill model showed four factors correlated with flares recurrence: age, therapeutic delay, Hurley III and higher IHS4. The limitations are: study's retrospective design, absence of a consensus about flare definition.

CONCLUSIONS

An early treatment of HS may prevent both the disease progression and reduce the recurrence of flares.

Adalimumab and infliximab survival in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a daily practice cohort study

BACKGROUND

Biologics are often required for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, data on the drug survival of biologics in daily practice are currently lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the drug survival of antitumour necrosis factor biologics in a daily practice cohort of patients with HS and to identify predictors for drug survival.

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre study was performed in two academic dermatology centres in the Netherlands. Adult patients with HS using biologics between 2008 and 2020 were included. Drug survival was analysed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and predictors of survival with univariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall drug survival of adalimumab (n = 104) at 12 and 24 months was 56·3% and 30·5%, respectively, which was predominantly determined by infectiveness. Older age (P = 0·02) and longer disease duration (P < 0·01) were associated with longer survival time. For infliximab (n = 44), overall drug survival was 58·3% and 48·6% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and was predominantly determined by infectiveness and side-effects. Surgery during treatment was associated with a longer survival time (P = 0·01).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival rates were comparable for adalimumab and infliximab at 12 months, and were mainly determined by ineffectiveness. Age, disease duration (adalimumab) and surgery (infliximab) are predictors for longer survival.

Global Harmonization of Morphological Definitions in Hidradenitis Suppurativa for a Proposed Glossary

Importance

Standard morphological terminology and definitions are vital for identification of lesion types in the clinical trial setting and communication about the condition. For hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), morphological definitions have been proposed by different groups, representing various regions of the world, but no international consensus has been reached regarding such definitions. A lack of globally harmonized terminology and definitions may contribute to poor-quality data collection in clinical trials as well as poor communication among clinicians, investigators, and patients.

Objective

To establish and validate consensus definitions for typical morphological findings for HS lesions.

Methods

This study was conducted from August 2019 to August 2020. A Delphi study technique was used to assess agreement and then resolve disagreement on HS terminology among international experts. After an initial preparation phase, the process consisted of 3 rounds. In each round, participants reviewed preliminary definitions and rated them as "keep, with no changes," "keep, with changes," or "remove." Eight HS primary lesions, including papule, pustule, nodule, plaque, ulcer, abscess, comedo, and tunnel, were selected because they are most frequently used in HS clinician-reported outcome measures. The initial definitions were based on extant literature, and modifications were made between rounds based on qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended responses or discussion. Consensus was defined as greater than 70% to accept a definition. Consensus stability across rounds was defined as less than 15% change in agreement. Reliability was evaluated using the Gwet agreement coefficient. Validation was based on assessment of face validity and stability across rounds.

Results

A total of 31 experts participated. All 8 HS primary lesion definitions achieved greater than 70% consensus by Delphi round 3. Stability was achieved for papule, pustule, and abscess. The Gwet agreement coefficient increased from 0.49 (95% CI, 0.26-0.71) in round 1 to 0.78 (95% CI, 0.64-0.92) in round 3. Face validity was supported by expert endorsement to keep terms in survey responses. Previously unmeasured variation among clinicians' definition of tunnels was identified, and consensus was achieved.

Conclusions and Relevance

An international group of experts agreed on definitions for morphological features of HS lesions frequently included in HS clinical trials. These international consensus terms and definitions are needed to support consistency of lesion identification and quantification in clinical trials.

In-Depth Analysis of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Serum Proteome Identifies Distinct Inflammatory Subtypes

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with presentations ranging from painful nodules and abscesses to draining tunnels. Using an unbiased proteomics approach, we assessed cardiovascular-, cardiometabolic-, and inflammation-related biomarkers in the serum of patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. The serum of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa clustered separately from that of healthy controls and had an upregulation of neutrophil-related markers (Cathepsin D, IL-17A, CXCL1). Patients with histologically diagnosed dermal tunnels had higher serum lipocalin-2 levels compared with those without tunnels. Consistent with this, patients with tunnels had a more neutrophilic-rich serum signature, marked by Cathepsin D, IL-17A, and IL-17D alterations. There was a significant serum‒skin correlation between proteins in the serum and the corresponding mRNA expression in skin biopsies, with healthy-appearing perilesional skin demonstrating a significant correlation with neutrophil-related proteins in the serum. CSF3 mRNA levels in lesional skin significantly correlated with neutrophil-related proteins in the serum, suggesting that CFS3 in the skin may be a driver of neutrophilic inflammation. Clinical significantly correlated with the levels of lipocalin-2 and IL-17A in the serum. Using an unbiased, large-scale proteomic approach, we demonstrate that hidradenitis suppurativa is a systemic neutrophilic dermatosis, with a specific molecular signature associated with the presence of dermal tunnels.

Dermal tunnels influence time to clinical response and family history influences time to loss of clinical response in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa treated with adalimumab

BACKGROUND

Clinical response in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is most commonly assessed using the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) measure. Dermal tunnels, increased body mass index, smoking and antibiotic use significantly decrease the odds of achieving HiSCR. However, there are few data exploring if clinical features are also associated with length of time to achieve clinical response and/or time to lose clinical response.

AIM

To explore whether variables associated with achievement of HiSCR are associated with time to achieve HiSCR and time to loss of HiSCR in patients with HS treated with adalimumab 40 mg weekly in the PIONEER open-label extension study.

METHODS

Time-to-event analyses were performed to estimate time to achieve HiSCR and time to loss of HiSCR. The log rank test was used to compare cumulative incidence curves for a priori patient- and disease-associated factors. Cox regression analysis was performed to compare time-to-event outcomes in the presence of a priori variables. All statistical analyses were completed with R software (V3.5.3).

RESULTS

Presence of dermal tunnels significantly increased the time to achieve HiSCR (median 32.6 vs. 14.3 weeks, P = 0.02) and the hazard ratio (HR) was significant after controlling for patient and disease factors (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.96, P = 0.03). A positive family history of HS significantly decreased the time to loss of HiSCR (median 11.4 vs. 18 weeks, P < 0.001) and remained significant in Cox regression analysis (HR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.40-2.88, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of dermal tunnels significantly influences the odds of achieving HiSCR and the time to achieve HiSCR, while family history influences time to loss of HiSCR.

Clinical selection criteria in new clinical trials of hidradenitis suppurativa: External validity and implications on the daily clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

There are an increasing number of biologic drugs in the pipeline for treating hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Clinical trials for these drugs usually share the same clinical selection criteria.

OBJECTIVES

(a) To describe the clinical profile of HS patients receiving first-line biologic treatment in an HS clinic setting, (b) to assess how this population would meet clinical criteria to participate in a clinical trial, and (c) to assess treatment effectiveness at week 16 in eligible vs non-eligible patients.

METHODS

Prospective observational study. Patients were grouped according to their eligibility for clinical trials. The effectiveness of adalimumab was assessed by HiSCR, IHS4-category-change and a-50%-reduction on IHS4 at week 16.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included in the study: eight (21.05%) were eligible for clinical trials and 30 (78.95%) were not. The main reason for non-eligibility was not having an AN count ≥5. Both groups presented similar number of draining tunnels. Effectiveness at week 16 was lower in non-eligible than eligible patients when evaluated by HiSCR-response but similar if evaluated by the IHS4-category-change or the 50%-reduction in IHS4.

CONCLUSION

In our population, the external validity of current eligibility criteria for clinical trials is low. Most patients receiving adalimumab in real-life setting would not be eligible for clinical trials.

Doppler ultrasound-based noninvasive biomarkers in hidradenitis suppurativa: evaluation of analytical and clinical validity

BACKGROUND

There is a need for valid and reliable biomarkers in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) for diagnosis and disease activity monitoring. Imaging-based biomarkers have the potential to fulfil this unmet need but no evaluation of analytical or clinical validity has yet been undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the analytical and clinical validity of sonographic epidermal thickness, Doppler ultrasound and dermal tunnel diameter in patients with HS.

METHODS

Twenty-two participants with HS were recruited and underwent a total of 65 matched ultrasound and skin biopsies of lesional, perilesional and unaffected tissue. Ultrasound measurements were performed in triplicate with mean values used. Skin biopsies underwent immunohistochemistry as per previously published methods. Analytical validity was assessed in individual ultrasound-biopsy pairs (n = 65) by comparisons of sonographic variables with histological correlates. Clinical validity was assessed in individual patients (n = 22) by comparing measures of overall disease activity with sonographic outcomes.

RESULTS

Epidermal thickness, dermal tunnel diameter and power Doppler intensity were assessed. Sonographic epidermal thickness and dermal tunnel diameter have high analytical validity with corresponding histological measurements. Power Doppler intensity demonstrated high correlation with dermal CD3⁺ and CD11c⁺ cell counts but not neutrophil elastase-positive cells. Power Doppler ultrasound has significant correlation with pain scores, abscess and nodule count, International HS Severity Scoring System score and number of draining tunnels.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonographic epidermal thickness and dermal tunnel diameter have acceptable levels of analytical validity in the assessment of HS lesions. Power Doppler intensity demonstrates acceptable clinical and analytical validity, suggesting it is a valid imaging-based biomarker in HS.

The effect of subcutaneous brodalumab on clinical disease activity in hidradenitis suppurativa: An open-label cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa is an autoinflammatory disorder of keratinization, with dysregulation of T helper type 17 cytokines. Brodalumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the interleukin (IL) 17 receptor A receptor.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and tolerability and clinical response at weeks 12 and 24 of brodalumab in moderate to severe HS. Ten participants with no history of inflammatory bowel disease were administered brodalumab 210 mg/1.5 mL subcutaneously at weeks 0, 1, and 2 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 24. Participants were assessed for adverse events (grade 2/3 adverse events) and clinical response (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response [HiSCR], Sartorius, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System [IHS4]), including ultrasonography and skin biopsies.

RESULTS

All 10 participants completed the study. No grade 2/3 adverse events associated with the use of brodalumab were reported. All patients (100%) achieved HiSCR, and 80% achieved IHS4 category change at week 12. HiSCR achievement occurred as early as week 2, likely due to the unique blockade of IL-17A, IL-17C, and IL-17F by brodalumab. Significant improvements were seen in pain, itch, quality of life, and depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Brodalumab was well tolerated in this HS cohort, with no serious adverse events and improvement in clinical outcomes. Alterations in dose frequency may be required in those with advanced disease, which requires further exploration.