Bullous pemphigoid after anti-programmed death-1 therapy: A retrospective case-control study evaluating impact on tumor response and survival outcomes

Defining D-irAEs: consensus-based disease definitions for the diagnosis of dermatologic adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

With an increasing number of patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is on the rise. Dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAEs) are the most common and earliest to manifest, often with important downstream consequences for the patient. Current guidelines lack clarity in terms of diagnostic criteria for D-irAEs. The goal of this project is to better define D-irAE for the purposes of identification, diagnosis, and future study of this important group of diseases.The objectives of this project were to develop consensus guidance for an approach to D-irAEs including disease definitions and severity grading. Knowing that consensus among oncologists, dermatologists, and irAE subspecialists would be critical for usability, we formed a Dermatologic irAE Disease Definition Panel. The panel was composed of 34 experts, including oncologists, dermatologists, a rheumatologist, and an allergist/immunologist from 22 institutions across the USA and internationally. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two virtual meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness, and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. A working group aggregated survey responses and incorporated them into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions.Following revisions based on panelist feedback, all items received consensus in the second round of ratings. Consensus definitions were achieved for 10 core D-irAE diagnoses: ICI-vitiligo, ICI-lichen planus, ICI-psoriasis, ICI-exanthem, ICI-bullous pemphigoid, ICI-Grover's, ICI-eczematous, ICI-eruptive atypical squamous proliferation, ICI-pruritus without rash, and ICI-erosive mucocutaneous. A standard evaluation for D-irAE was also found to reach consensus, with disease-specific exceptions detailed when necessary. Each disorder's description includes further details on disease subtypes, symptoms, supportive exam findings, and three levels of diagnostic certainty (definite, probable, and possible).These consensus-driven disease definitions standardize D-irAE classification in a useable framework for multiple disciplines and will be the foundation for future work. Given consensus on their accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that they can be used broadly across clinical and research settings.

From Molecular Insights to Clinical Perspectives in Drug-Associated Bullous Pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common autoimmune blistering disease, is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting BP180 and BP230 in the basement membrane zone. This leads to the activation of complement-dependent and independent pathways, resulting in proteolytic cleavage at the dermoepidermal junction and an eosinophilic inflammatory response. While numerous drugs have been associated with BP in the literature, causality and pathogenic mechanisms remain elusive in most cases. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), in particular, are the most frequently reported drugs related to BP and, therefore, have been extensively investigated. They can potentially trigger BP through the impaired proteolytic degradation of BP180, combined with immune dysregulation. DPP4i-associated BP can be categorized into true drug-induced BP and drug-triggered BP, with the latter resembling classic BP. Antineoplastic immunotherapy is increasingly associated with BP, with both B and T cells involved. Other drugs, including biologics, diuretics and cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric agents, present weaker evidence and poorly understood pathogenic mechanisms. Further research is needed due to the growing incidence of BP and the increasing identification of new potential triggers.

Cutaneous Adverse Events and Cancer Survival Prognosis With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Growing research suggests that the prevalence of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) is associated with favorable outcomes among individuals with cancer who receive immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.

Objective

To identify whether the presence of cirAEs and their subtypes subsequent to ICI administration is associated with enhanced cancer prognosis.

Data Sources

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for publications examining the association between cirAE development during ICI treatment and subsequent cancer prognosis. The initial search was limited to English-language publications from database inception until December 31, 2022; a subsequent search was performed on May 21, 2023.

Study Selection

Two reviewers independently scrutinized the identical articles and included those that constituted original research evaluating the association between cirAE development and cancer prognosis.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The search terms, study objectives, and methodological protocols were defined before study initiation. The aforementioned 2 reviewers performed data extraction independently and resolved discrepancies through agreement. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO. Data analyses were conducted between May 21 and June 1, 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The major outcome end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses were also conducted according to cirAE type, cancer type, geographic region, study design, and ICI type. Given the heterogeneity inherent in the included studies, a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was adopted.

Results

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 23 studies with a total of 22 749 patients treated with ICIs. The occurrence of cirAEs was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52-0.72]; P < .001) and PFS (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.41-0.65]; P < .001). Consistent results were observed across all subgroups stratified by study design, geographic region, ICI type, and cancer type, aligning with the overall estimate of OS and PFS improvement. However, no statistically significant differences were identified in terms of PFS within studies conducted in the US.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the presence of cirAEs and their subtypes was associated with improved prognosis for individuals with cancer undergoing ICI treatment. These findings suggest that cirAEs may have useful prognostic value in ICI treatment.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Moving beyond "maculopapular rash"

Uncoupling toxicity from therapeutic effect lies at the foundation of the current state of the field of cutaneous immune-related adverse events to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This will be achieved through understanding the drivers of toxicity, tumor response, and resistance via large, well-powered population-level studies, institutional cohort data, and cellular-level data. Increasing diagnostic specificity through the application of consensus disease definitions has the power to improve clinical care and each approach to research. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events are associated with increased survival, and their treatment must invoke the maintenance of a delicate balance between immunosuppression, anti-tumor effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and quality of life. The multidisciplinary care of cancer patients with adverse events is critical to optimizing clinical and translational research outcomes and, as such, dermatologists are vital to moving the study of cutaneous adverse events forward.

Autoimmune bullous dermatoses in cancer patients treated by immunotherapy: a literature review and Italian multicentric experience

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events are frequently associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administration in cancer patients. In fact, these monoclonal antibodies bind the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 leading to a non-specific activation of the immune system against both tumoral cells and self-antigens. The skin is the most frequently affected organ system appearing involved especially by inflammatory manifestations such as maculopapular, lichenoid, psoriatic, and eczematous eruptions. Although less common, ICI-induced autoimmune blistering diseases have also been reported, with an estimated overall incidence of less than 5%. Bullous pemphigoid-like eruption is the predominant phenotype, while lichen planus pemphigoides, pemphigus vulgaris, and mucous membrane pemphigoid have been described anecdotally. Overall, they have a wide range of clinical presentations and often overlap with each other leading to a delayed diagnosis. Achieving adequate control of skin toxicity in these cases often requires immunosuppressive systemic therapies and/or interruption of ICI treatment, presenting a therapeutic challenge in the context of cancer management. In this study, we present a case series from Italy based on a multicenter, retrospective, observational study, which included 45 patients treated with ICIs who developed ICI-induced bullous pemphigoid. In addition, we performed a comprehensive review to identify the cases reported in the literature on ICI-induced autoimmune bullous diseases. Several theories seeking their underlying pathogenesis have been reported and this work aims to better understand what is known so far on this issue.

A case of drug-induced bullous pemphigoid secondary to immunotherapy treated with upadacitinib: A case report

Bullous pemphigoid is an acquired autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease that can arise following exposure to systemic medication, referred to as drug-induced bullous pemphigoid. Drug-induced bullous pemphigoid is a rare but potentially serious immune-related adverse event that should be considered in patients with advanced malignancies undergoing immunotherapy, with immune checkpoint inhibitors emerging in particular as a well-documented drug association in drug-induced bullous pemphigoid. We present a 74-year-old female with recurrent metastatic programmed cell death-ligand 1–positive squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck area who developed drug-induced bullous pemphigoid in the setting of immunotherapy with a novel immunoglobulin-like transcript 4 inhibitor (MK-4830) in combination with pembrolizumab. Treatment with upadacitinib, a Janus-associated kinase-1 inhibitor, was pursued for significantly disabling disease that was recalcitrant to standard therapies and ultimately transition to palliative care. Follow-up at 4 weeks demonstrated good response. This is the first report describing the use of a Janus-associated kinase inhibitor for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid.

Bullous pemphigoid associated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 therapy: A case series of 13 patients

We present a case series of 13 patients, the first Australian single-centre study of bullous pemphigoid (BP) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA4) and programmed cell death receptor (PD1) inhibitors. All our patients achieved adequate control of BP with a combination of treatments including oral prednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab and omalizumab. The majority of patients ceased or interrupted immunotherapy treatment upon diagnosis of BP and greater tumour progression was seen in the cohort who ceased immunotherapy.

A Review of Bullous Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated with Anti-Cancer Therapy

The rapid evolution of anti-cancer therapy (including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy) in recent years has led to a more favorable efficacy and safety profile for a growing cancer population, and the improvement of overall survival and reduction of morbidity for many cancers. Anti-cancer therapy improves outcomes for cancer patients; however, many classes of anti-cancer therapy have been implicated in the induction of bullous dermatologic adverse events (DAE), leading to reduced patient quality of life and in some cases discontinuation of life-prolonging or palliative therapy. Timely and effective management of adverse events is critical for reducing treatment interruptions and preserving an anti-tumor effect. Bullous DAE may be limited to the skin or have systemic involvement with greater risk of morbidity and mortality. We present the epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of bullous DAE secondary to anti-cancer therapies to enable clinicians to optimize management for these patients.

A case report of steroid-refractory bullous pemphigoid induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

The widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in several malignancies has revealed new immune-related adverse events. Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an antibody-driven autoimmune disease characterized by skin inflammation and fluid-filled bullae. Herein, a 69-year-old man with lung squamous cell carcinoma developed multiple vesicles and tense bullae 3 weeks after the initiation of a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy. Biopsy revealed a subepidermal bulla with lymphocytic and eosinophil infiltration, and immunohistochemical studies predominantly showed CD4⁺ cells, a few CD8⁺ cells, and the occasional CD20⁺ lymphocyte. The serum anti-BP180 antibody level, as well as the interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 levels, were elevated compared to the lower levels of tumor necrosis factor-α. Eosinophil levels were high and consistent with the development of blisters. A diagnosis of BP associated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy was made, and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classification was grade 3. Immunotherapy was permanently discontinued, and the patient's bullous lesions failed to react to high-dose systemic corticosteroids combined with minocycline and niacinamide. Intermittent blister recurrence occurred in 2 months, eventually improving with the administration of two courses of intravenous immunoglobulin. At 5 weeks of follow-up, the patient's tumor was reduced on a computed tomographic scan. Despite stable BP treatment, however, he repeatedly developed complications due to the complexity of his underlying disease and could not be treated with anti-tumor therapy. Early recognition and management of serious immune-related bullous dermatologic toxicity are essential for patient safety.

Cutaneous manifestations associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that block key mediators of tumor-mediated immune evasion. The frequency of its use has increased rapidly and has extended to numerous cancers. ICIs target immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), PD ligand 1 (PD-L1), and T cell activation, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4). However, ICI-driven alterations in the immune system can induce various immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that affect multiple organs. Among these, cutaneous irAEs are the most common and often the first to develop. Skin manifestations are characterized by a wide range of phenotypes, including maculopapular rash, psoriasiform eruption, lichen planus-like eruption, pruritus, vitiligo-like depigmentation, bullous diseases, alopecia, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. In terms of pathogenesis, the mechanism of cutaneous irAEs remains unclear. Still, several hypotheses have been proposed, including activation of T cells against common antigens in normal tissues and tumor cells, increased release of proinflammatory cytokines associated with immune-related effects in specific tissues/organs, association with specific human leukocyte antigen variants and organ-specific irAEs, and acceleration of concurrent medication-induced drug eruptions. Based on recent literature, this review provides an overview of each ICI-induced skin manifestation and epidemiology and focuses on the mechanisms underlying cutaneous irAEs.

Two rare cases of bullous pemphigoid associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Bullous pemphigoid is a rare and severe adverse reaction to immune-checkpoint inhibitors that can be life-threatening. Here, we present two cases of bullous pemphigoid secondary to nivolumab and ipilimumab+nivolumab therapy, respectively. Both cases presented months after discontinuation of immunotherapy. Our first case highlights the life-threatening nature of bullous pemphigoid due to its potential to cause laryngeal oedema. Our second case illustrates that cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 inhibitors can rarely lead to bullous pemphigoid, in addition to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Both cases emphasise the importance of skin examinations and dermatological follow-up for patients during and even after discontinuation of immunotherapy.

Checkpoint inhibitor-associated bullous cutaneous immune-related adverse events: a multicentre observational study

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has significantly improved overall survival in several cancers including metastatic melanoma (MM) and in the adjuvant setting. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) secondary to CPIs are commonly observed; however, autoimmune blistering disorders such as bullous pemphigoid (BP) are rare.

OBJECTIVES

To review the prevalence, incidence risk, clinicopathological features and management of toxicity in bullous cutaneous irAEs associated with CPI therapy.

METHODS

A multicentre, retrospective, observational study of CPI-associated bullous irAEs in adults with all cancers across four UK specialist centres between 2006 and 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 7391 patients were identified. CPI-associated bullous irAEs including BP (n = 16) occurred in 0·3% (n = 22). The median age of onset was 76 years, and there was a male predominance. Most patients had cutaneous melanoma (73%, n = 16), of which 81% (13 of 16) were BRAF wildtype. Grade 1, 2, 3 and 4 skin toxicity occurred in 9%, 45%, 41% and 5%, respectively. The mucosae were involved in 27%, and 25% of confirmed cases of BP did not present with bullae. The median time to onset of bullous irAEs was 12 months, with a median total symptom duration of 6 months. Single PD-1/PD-L1 agents had a longer time to onset of symptoms than combination therapy (median 12 vs. 7 months, respectively). Overall, 91%, 64% and 9% of patients required one, two or three lines of treatment, respectively. Two cases occurred after completion of CPIs (1 and 3 months). Of the 20 cases that presented while on CPIs this was permanently discontinued in 55% (11 of 20) and temporarily held in 20% (four of 20). In the four held cases of CPI, bullous eruption reflared in 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

CPI-associated bullous skin toxicity is a rare cutaneous irAE occurring in approximately 0·3% of cases over 13 years of treated patients in this series. Not all cases are diagnostic of BP, but management remains the same. There is a prolonged latency of onset compared with other cutaneous irAEs, with a median time of 12 months, and they can occur after cessation of therapy. Discontinuation of CPIs may be required. Recognizing bullous irAEs promptly and referral to dermatology are essential to optimize management and improve patient outcomes and tumour responses. What is already known about this topic? Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-associated bullous pemphigoid is a rare dermatological immune-related adverse event (irAE) that has been reported in small case series and reports. What does this study add? This is the largest multicentre, observational study conducted in the UK over the longest period of 13 years, which demonstrates an overall incidence of bullous cutaneous irAEs secondary to CPIs of 0·3%. Clinical presentation is variable, with one-quarter of patients with bullous pemphigoid presenting without bullae, and mucosal involvement was noted in 27%. Prolonged pruritus is frequently a prodromal symptom. The median time to diagnosis is 12 months and irAEs rarely present after cessation of treatment. Time to onset of symptoms is longer with a single CPI, but with a shorter duration of symptoms compared with combination CPI therapy. Most patients had cutaneous melanoma, of which 81% were BRAF wildtype.

A Retrospective, Single-Institution Experience of Bullous Pemphigoid as an Adverse Effect of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Simple Summary

This article investigates the cutaneous adverse immune effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. These drugs target proteins expressed on cancer cells that aid in the avoidance of immune system detection and destruction. Immune checkpoint inhibitors inadvertently cause other immune-mediated adverse effects. Cutaneous toxicities are the commonest adverse effect from immunotherapy; furthermore, they are usually developed early in the course of treatment. A rare and severe cutaneous adverse event is Bullous Pemphigoid. This article investigates the average and median onset of these drug toxicities, as well as treatments. We found these side effects to be negatively skewed, indicating most cases occur several months into treatment.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a class of cancer treatment drugs that stimulate the immune system’s ability to fight tumor cells. These drugs are monoclonal antibodies targeting im-mune-inhibiting proteins on cancer cells, such as CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors cause many immune-related adverse events. Cutaneous toxicities are of the most common adverse effects and occur with a range of severity. Bullous Pemphigoid is a rare adverse event with a high impact on quality of life that may occur after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. In this article, we investigate current research on immune checkpoint inhibitors, cutaneous adverse events, and common presentations and treatments, with a specific focus on Bullous Pemphigoid, its characteristics, onset timing, and treatment. Significant findings include a negative skew in the onset of presentation. Furthermore, we describe exclusive cases.

Association of Bullous Pemphigoid With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review

Importance

There is limited information on immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid (ICI-BP) in patients with cancer, with most existing studies being case reports or small case series from a single institution. Prior review attempts have not approached the literature in a systematic manner and have focused only on ICI-BP secondary to anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. The current knowledge base of all aspects of ICI-BP is limited.

Objective

To characterize the risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, treatments, and outcomes of ICI-BP in patients with cancer as reported in the current literature.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Articles reporting data on individual patients who met preestablished inclusion criteria were selected, and a predefined set of data was abstracted. When possible, study results were quantitatively combined.

Findings

In total, 70 studies reporting data on 127 individual patients undergoing ICI therapy for cancer (median [IQR] age, 71 [64-77] years; 27 women [21.3%]) were included. In pooled analyses, patients ranged in age from 35 to 90 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid often occurred during the course of anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 therapy but was also found to develop up to several months after treatment cessation. Prodromal symptoms, such as pruritus or nonspecific skin eruptions, were found in approximately half of the patient population. Histopathologic or serologic testing, when undertaken, was a helpful adjunct in establishing diagnosis. Treatment with immunotherapy was discontinued after ICI-BP development in most patients. The most common treatments were systemic and topical corticosteroids. Steroid-sparing therapies, such as antibiotics and other systemic immunomodulators, were also used as adjuvant treatment modalities. Biologic and targeted agents, used predominantly in cases refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, were associated with marked symptomatic improvement in most patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this systematic review suggest that ICI-BP often poses a therapeutic challenge for patients with cancer who are receiving immunotherapy. Further research on the early recognition, diagnosis, and use of targeted treatment modalities will be essential in developing more personalized treatment options for affected patients while minimizing morbidity and mortality.

Skin Manifestation Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

In accordance with recent therapeutic progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors for certain cancers, various disorders are induced as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affecting the skin, gut, thyroid gland, lung, and liver. Among such irAEs, mucocutaneous manifestation is the most common. Cutaneous manifestations are categorized into several groups, ie, inflammatory reactions, immunobullous reactions, alterations of epidermal keratinocytes, and alterations of epidermal melanocytes; however, there are additionally various cutaneous toxicities, unclassified into those groups. Blocking of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PDL1) can lead to the induction of autoimmune reaction, via activation of cytotoxic T cells, inhibition of regulatory T cell function, and alteration of cytokine balance. Similarly, blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) reduces the suppressive function of regulatory T cells. Due to those mechanisms, various autoimmune conditions can be induced, in addition to nonspecific drug eruptions. Dermatologists should be aware of various types of those mucocutaneous manifestations, either common or rare, as well as the management of such conditions. Herein, various mucocutaneous manifestations of irAEs and cases involving Japanese patients have been described, based on a single institute's experience.

Risk Factors for the Development of Bullous Pemphigoid in US Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Importance

De novo bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare immune-mediated adverse event from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that can necessitate permanent discontinuation of the anticancer therapy, but the risk factors for developing this toxic effect are unknown.

Objective

To compare potential risk factors for BP in patients treated with ICIs who did and did not develop BP.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort and nested propensity score-matched case-control study was conducted at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Massachusetts General Hospital. All patients at these facilities with de novo BP after ICI treatment were compared with all patients on the cancer registry who were treated with ICIs between October 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. Patients with incomplete or blinded data regarding the ICI agent or total cycles were excluded.

Exposures

In the cohort, assessed potential risk factors included age at ICI introduction, sex, ICI molecular target, and cancer type, which were then used as matching variables. In the propensity score-matched case-control analysis, risk factors assessed included sex, race and ethnicity, cancer stage, metastasis sites, idiopathic BP comorbidities, pre-ICI vaccination, radiation history, body mass index, and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Diagnosis of BP at any point after ICI treatment, confirmed by direct immunofluorescence, indirect immunofluorescence, autoantibody serologies, or diagnostic consensus among study board-certified dermatologists. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated for all risk factors. In the secondary analysis, best overall responses to ICIs between cases and controls were compared by Fisher exact test.

Results

Among 5636 patients treated with ICIs at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Massachusetts General Hospital during the study period, 35 (0.6%; median [IQR] age, 72.8 [13.4] years; 71.4% [25] male patients) developed BP. In a multivariate logistic regression model that assessed 2955 patients with complete data in the cancer registry, age 70 years or older (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.19-4.59; P = .01), having melanoma (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.51-6.58; P < .003), and having nonmelanoma skin cancer (OR, 8.32; 95% CI, 2.81-21.13; P < .001) were significantly associated with developing BP. In the nested 1:2 case-control comparison of all 35 cases to 70 propensity score-matched controls, a complete or partial response on initial restaging imaging was a risk factor for BP development (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.35-9.30; P = .01). Bullous pemphigoid cases also more frequently exhibited overall tumor response to ICIs than matched controls (29 of 35 [82.9%] vs 43 of 70 [61.4%]; P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, age 70 years or older and skin cancer were associated with increased risk of developing ICI-associated BP. Given the association of BP with improved initial and best overall tumor responses, early identification and toxic effect-directed treatment should be prioritized, especially in individuals at risk for developing de novo BP.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events among Taiwanese cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors link to a survival benefit

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events are common in cancer patients receiving immunotherapies but seldom studied in a comprehensive way of collecting all cancer types with comparisons between different immune-oncology drugs and correlation to patient survival. In this retrospective cohort study, we recruited 468 cancer patients receiving immunotherapies in a tertiary referral center in Taiwan and try to determine real-world incidence of cutaneous immune-related adverse events and their associations with the survival rates. Among them, 128 patients (27.4%) had cutaneous immune-related adverse events, with maculopapular eruption (10.6%) and pruritus (10.1%) most frequently identified in the monotherapy group. The incidence of these cutaneous immune-related adverse events was highest in patients receiving pembrolizumab (34.1%, P < .0001). Concurrent usage of molecular-targeted therapy with immunotherapy was associated with a higher incidence (57.8%, P < .0001). The Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test showed that patients with any type of immune-related cutaneous adverse events had longer survival time than those without (P < .0001). In conclusion, having either type of cutaneous immune-related adverse event in cancer patients receiving immunotherapies was correlated with a longer overall survival. Prompt diagnosis and suitable treatment are important.

Bullous Pemphigoid in Patients Receiving Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors and Psoriatic Patients—Focus on Clinical and Histopathological Variation

Background: The most common autoimmune blistering disease, bullous pemphigoid (BP), shows an increased prevalence in psoriatic patients and oncologic patients undergoing immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB). Even though the same autoantigens (BP180/BP230) are detectable, it remains obscure whether clinical or histopathological differences exist between these different groups of BP patients. In this study, we strived to analyze this matter based on own data and previously published reports. Methods: We performed an institutional chart review from 2010–2020 to identify BP patients with psoriasis (n = 6) or underlying ICB (n = 4) and matched them with idiopathic cases of BP (n = 33). We compared clinical characteristics, subtypes, and dermatopathological determinants (e.g., tissue eosinophilia/neutrophilia, papillary edema, lymphocytic infiltration) among the groups. Results: ICB-associated BP affects men more often and might show mucosal involvement more frequently. We found no statistically significant dermatopathological differences among the groups. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of an increased risk of BP in patients with psoriasis and oncologic patients receiving ICB; atypical pruritic skin lesions should prompt a workup including a skin biopsy for histopathology and direct immunofluorescence in these patients. Larger studies might be necessary to detect slight dermatopathological variation.

"Skin rashes" and immunotherapy in melanoma: distinct dermatologic adverse events and implications for therapeutic management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in the treatment of different cancers by stimulating the antitumoral activity of the patient’s immune system, representing a major breakthrough in the field of cancer therapy. Monoclonal antibodies including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4, anti–programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand inhibitors have been approved for advanced melanoma among other solid cancers. Although immunotherapy demonstrated a good safety profile, a new spectrum of multisystemic immune-related adverse events has been recently reported due to their use. Cutaneous reactions represent one of the leading adverse events, often reported in literature as “skin rash”, and rarely further characterized in distinct dermatologic entities. Herein we describe the distinctive cutaneous rashes occurring during immunotherapies for advanced melanoma, discussing implications in the treatment management.

A case of durvalumab-induced lichenoid eruption evolving to bullous eruption after phototherapy: A case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy nowadays became a treatment for a wide range of cancers, and may be responsible for various dermatologic adverse effects, including bullous eruptions. In our report, we present a case of late-onset immunotherapy-induced eruption in a 62-year-old woman treated with anti-programmed cell death-L1 agent durvalumab for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. Diagnosed as lichenoid dermatitis upon initial presentation, this eruption evolved into necrotic bullous dermatitis after several weeks of phototherapy, with histology and direct immunofluorescence study favoring lichen planus pemphigoides. Thus, this case may be regarded as durvalumab-induced lichenoid dermatitis with phototherapy-triggered progression to necrotic lichen planus pemphigoides-like eruption. The patient’s eruption responded to oral prednisone and immunotherapy interruption. Interestingly, durvalumab reintroduction in this patient led to recurrent lichenoid dermatitis without bullous component. This case of immunotherapy skin toxicity is rather distinctive by its clinical and histopathologic features, with phototherapy as an additional triggering factor.

Retrospective Analysis of Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy-Associated Cases of Bullous Pemphigoid From Six German Dermatology Centers

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a class-effect of checkpoint inhibitors (CIs). The development of a Bullous pemphigoid (BP)-like blistering disease, driven by autoantibodies against the hemidesmosomal protein BP180, is a potentially serious irAE whose incidence seems to be increasing. We therefore set out to characterize the clinical and (immuno)histopathological features and treatment responses of cases of BP which developed during or after CI therapy collated in six German tertiary referral centers between 2014 and 2018. We identified twelve cases of BP which emerged during and/or after CI therapy. The time interval between the initiation of CI therapy and the diagnosis of BP was 3-74 weeks (median: 23 weeks). Age at the time of diagnosis of BP varied between 62 and 80 years (median: 76 years). The clinical presentation of the patients was diverse but the severity was relatively mild when compared to that seen in most cases of spontaneous BP. Only four patients met all of the immunopathological criteria recommended in the European guidelines for the diagnosis of BP. Topical corticosteroid treatment was sufficient to achieve disease control in most patients. CI therapy could be continued in 8 out of 12 patients. In summary, our study indicates that cases of BP during or after CI therapy bear several peculiarities distinguishing them from spontaneous BP. Given the diversity of the clinical presentation of CI-induced BP the application of existing diagnostic algorithms developed for spontaneous BP can be utilized to uncover the frequency and features of CI-induced BP and to develop and optimize management algorithms.

Cemiplimab for locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: safety, efficacy, and position in therapy panel

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (lacSCC) is rare. Approximately one-fourth of the cases are observed among immunocompromised patients, in particular in solid organ transplant recipients (OTRs). LacSCC has a very poor prognosis. Surgery with or without radiotherapy remains the golden standard of treatment for cSCC. However, in advanced cases, there is a medical need for alternative treatment options. Classic systemic treatments include chemotherapy and/or EGFR inhibitors. Recently the effectiveness of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors has been demonstrated for lacSCC. Cemiplimab is a recombinant IgG4 human monoclonal antibody against the PD-1 protein for the intravenous treatment of lacSCC.

AREAS COVERED

The principal studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cemiplimab for lacSCC are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Cemiplimab is the first anti-PD-1 antibody that was FDA (2018) and EMA (2019) approved as a systemic treatment for lacSCC and/or metastatic cSCC when curative surgery or radiotherapy is no longer amenable. For this situation, experts currently recommend cemiplimab as a first-line systemic alternative. As cemiplimab therapy is potentially associated with a risk of organ graft rejection, pros and cons should be evaluated for every individual OTR patient with lacSCC.

Bullous Pemphigoid: Trigger and Predisposing Factors

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most frequent autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease provoked by autoantibodies directed against two hemidesmosomal proteins: BP180 and BP230. Its pathogenesis depends on the interaction between predisposing factors, such as human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, comorbidities, aging, and trigger factors. Several trigger factors, such as drugs, thermal or electrical burns, surgical procedures, trauma, ultraviolet irradiation, radiotherapy, chemical preparations, transplants, and infections may induce or exacerbate BP disease. Identification of predisposing and trigger factors can increase the understanding of BP pathogenesis. Furthermore, an accurate anamnesis focused on the recognition of a possible trigger factor can improve prognosis by promptly removing it.

Treatment of Advanced Melanoma: Past, Present and Future

Therapeutic options for treating advanced melanoma are progressing rapidly. Until six years ago, the regimen for treating advanced melanoma mainly comprised cytotoxic agents such as dacarbazine, and type I interferons. Since 2014, anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD1) antibodies have become recognized as anchor drugs for treating advanced melanoma with or without additional combination drugs such as ipilimumab. In addition, v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) kinase inhibitors in combination with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors are among the most promising chemotherapeutic regimens for treating advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma, especially in patients with low tumor burden. Since anti-PD1 antibodies are widely applicable for the treatment of both BRAF wild-type and mutated advanced melanomas, several clinical trials for drugs in combination with anti-PD1 antibodies are ongoing. This review focuses on the development of the anti-melanoma therapies available today, and discusses the clinical trials of novel regimens for the treatment of advanced melanoma.

Significance of Immunosuppressive Cells as a Target for Immunotherapies in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have been detected in most skin cancers. TAMs produce various chemokines and angiogenic factors that promote tumor development, along with other immunosuppressive cells such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs) and tumor-associated neutrophils. TAMs generated from monocytes develop into functional, fully activated macrophages, and TAMs obtain various immunosuppressive functions to maintain the tumor microenvironment. Since TAMs express PD1 to maintain the immunosuppressive M2 phenotype by PD1/PD-L1 signaling from tumor cells, and the blockade of PD1/PD-L1 signaling by anti-PD1 antibodies (Abs) activate and re-polarize TAMs into immunoreactive M1 phenotypes, TAMs represent a potential target for anti-PD1 Abs. The main population of TAMs comprises CD163⁺ M2 macrophages, and CD163⁺ TAMs release soluble (s)CD163 and several proinflammatory chemokines (CXCL5, CXCL10, CCL19, etc.) as a result of TAM activation to induce an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment together with other immunosuppressive cells. Since direct blockade of PD1/PD-L1 signaling between tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating T cells (both effector T cells and Tregs) is mandatory for inducing an anti-immune response by anti-PD1 Abs, anti-PD1 Abs need to reach the tumor microenvironment to induce anti-immune responses in the tumor-bearing host. Taken together, TAM-related factors could offer a biomarker for anti-PD1 Ab-based immunotherapy. Understanding the crosstalk between TAMs and immunosuppressive cells is important for optimizing PD1 Ab-based immunotherapy.