Dupilumab-induced ocular surface disease: A systematic review

An expert consensus on managing dupilumab-related ocular surface disorders in people with atopic dermatitis 2024

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin condition and affects people of all ages. New therapies, including the monoclonal antibody therapy dupilumab, offer excellent efficacy. However, in clinical trials, and emphasized in real-world observations, an unexpected increased frequency of ocular adverse effects has become apparent. The effectiveness of dupilumab and the unpredictability of ocular adverse effects mean that clinicians need guidance on counselling patients prior to treatment and on managing them if adverse effects arise. The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and Royal College of Ophthalmologists collaborated on this consensus guidance on managing dupilumab-related ocular surface disorders (DROSD). A multidisciplinary group was formed of adult and paediatric dermatologists and ophthalmologists with expertise in DROSD, patient representatives and the BAD Clinical Standards Unit. A literature search was conducted and the results reviewed. All recommendations were reviewed, discussed and voted on. The recommendations pertain to dermatology and ophthalmology management, and apply to people of all ages, unless otherwise stated. Importantly, initiation of dupilumab for AD should not be delayed for most eye disorders except acute new problems (e.g. infections) or potentially severe conditions (e.g. a history of corneal transplant; ophthalmology advice should be sought first). There is insufficient evidence to recommend lubricant drops prophylactically. Dermatologists should assess eye complaints to diagnose DROSD; a severity grading system is provided. DROSD management differs slightly in those aged < 7 years, as ocular complications may affect neuro-ocular development. Therefore, irrespectively of DROSD severity, this population should be referred for ophthalmology advice. In those aged ≥ 7 years, dermatologists should feel confident to trial treatment and reserve ophthalmology advice for severe or nonresponding cases. Discussion about dupilumab withdrawal should be prompted by a significant impact on quality of life, threat to sight, or other complications. Although dupilumab is a highly effective agent for treating AD, the risk of ocular adverse effects should not inhibit clinicians or patients from using it, but clinicians should be aware of them. If a patient develops DROSD, there are clear pathways to assess severity and offer initial management. Where this is ineffective, dermatologists should assess the urgency and seek advice from or initiate referral to ophthalmology. While the evidence reviewed for these guidelines reflects the extensive literature on dupilumab, we believe our advice has relevance for ocular surface disorders in patients with AD treated with tralokinumab and lebrikizumab.

Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 5-Year Open-Label Extension Study

Importance

Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that often requires continuous long-term systemic management. Long-term safety and efficacy data for treatment options are critically important.

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for up to 5 years in adults with moderate to severe AD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The 5-year LIBERTY AD open-label extension study was conducted from September 2013 to June 2022 at 550 sites in 28 countries. The study enrolled adult patients with moderate to severe AD who had participated in previous dupilumab clinical trials. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to February 2023.

Exposures

At enrollment, patients initiated a regimen of subcutaneous dupilumab, 200 mg, weekly (400-mg loading dose). The regimen was amended in June 2014 to dupilumab, 300 mg, weekly (600-mg loading dose) based on a dose-ranging study and again in November 2019 to dupilumab, 300 mg, every 2 weeks to align with the regulatory regimen approvals.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end points were the incidence and rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Key secondary end points included incidence and rate of serious TEAEs and adverse events of special interest, proportion of patients achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear), and proportion of patients with 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from the parent study baseline.

Results

A total of 2677 patients were enrolled and treated in the open-label extension study; 1611 (60.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 39.2 (13.4) years. A total of 334 patients (12.5%) completed treatment up to week 260. The most common reasons for withdrawal were due to regulatory approval of dupilumab in compliance with the study protocol (810 of 1380 [58.7%]), patient withdrawal (248 of 1380 [18.0%]), and adverse events (116 of 1380 [8.4%]). Exposure-adjusted rates of TEAEs were generally stable or declined throughout the study. Common TEAEs (incidence of 5% or greater) included nasopharyngitis, worsening AD, upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis, conjunctivitis allergic, headache, oral herpes, and injection-site reaction. At week 260, 220 of 326 patients (67.5%) achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1 and 288 of 324 (88.9%) achieved 75% or greater improvement in the EASI. The mean (SD) EASI score was 16.39 (14.60) at baseline and 2.75 (5.62) at end of study.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, there was sustained safety and efficacy of continuous long-term dupilumab treatment for adults with moderate to severe AD.

Impact of Upadacitinib on Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis Exacerbated by Dupilumab Treatment in Atopic Dermatitis Patients: A Prospective Dermatological and Ophthalmological Clinical Evaluation in Common Clinical Practice

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory skin condition with a substantial impact on patients, particularly due to ocular involvement known as atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC). Current therapeutic approaches, such as dupilumab, often lead to conjunctivitis, prompting exploration of alternative treatments like upadacitinib. Methods: We collected dermatological and ophthalmological prospective clinical evaluations of six adults with moderate-to-severe AD, undergoing treatment with upadacitinib after discontinuation of dupilumab due to the onset of AKC during therapy and the worsening of dermatitis in particular in the head and neck region. Clinical evaluations, including EASI scores, itch and sleep NRS, DLQI, and ocular parameters, were performed at baseline (during screening assessment before switching to upadacitinib) and then at week 12 and week 24. Clinical evaluation of AKC was performed by a team of ophthalmologists. Results: Upadacitinib not only improved atopic dermatitis in terms of EASI, itching, and sleep NRS, but also demonstrated a notable reduction in ocular signs and symptoms, as indicated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Efron scale, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index Symptom Severity (OSDISS) scores. Discussion: Our observation of common clinical practice underscores the substantial impact of biological and small-molecule therapies on AD, emphasizing the limitation posed by dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis. Switching to upadacitinib significantly improved both clinical and functional ocular outcomes, suggesting its potential as an alternative therapeutic option for AD patients with ocular involvement. Conclusion: The presented data provides insights into the complex interplay between systemic therapies and ocular manifestations in AD. Upadacitinib emerges as a promising option to address dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis, offering improved quality of life for patients.

Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease or atopic keratoconjunctivitis not improved by dupilumab? Upadacitinib may clarify the dilemma: A case report

Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease is a common clinical sign appearing in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) just few months after dupilumab treatment start, developing in about 25% of patients. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) is a well-identified clinical entity, defined as a chronic inflammatory disease of eye that affects 25%-40% of patients with AD. Most clinical signs of ocular involvement in AD patients treated with dupilumab overlaps the AKC symptoms and signs. We supposed that Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease and AKC represent the same disease but differently called by dermatologists and ophthalmologists. AKC-like disease may develop during dupilumab therapy as a consequence of alternative cytokines pathway activation (e.g. IL33) secondary to IL-4/13 pathway block. The novel upadacitinib drug may bypass ILs pathway through Janus Kinases selective inhibition, avoiding positive or negative ILs feedback at the ocular surface level. In this case report, molecular analysis on conjunctival samples showed a lower ocular surface inflammation (lower expression of HLADR) although higher levels of IL4 and IL13 in a patient with AD and AKC during upadacitinib therapy, compared to prior dupilumab treatment. Target therapies in patients suffering from AD may prevent ocular and dermatological comorbidities improving quality of life before quality of skin and vision.

Dupilumab-associated head and neck dermatitis shows a pronounced type 22 immune signature mediated by oligoclonally expanded T cells

Dupilumab, an IL4R-blocking antibody, has shown clinical efficacy for atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. In addition to conjunctivitis/blepharitis, the de novo appearance of head/neck dermatitis is now recognized as a distinct side effect, occurring in up to 10% of patients. Histopathological features distinct from AD suggest a drug effect, but exact underlying mechanisms remain unknown. We profiled punch biopsies from dupilumab-associated head and neck dermatitis (DAHND) by using single-cell RNA sequencing and compared data with untreated AD and healthy control skin. We show that dupilumab treatment was accompanied by normalization of IL-4/IL-13 downstream activity markers such as CCL13, CCL17, CCL18 and CCL26. By contrast, we found strong increases in type 22-associated markers (IL22, AHR) especially in oligoclonally expanded T cells, accompanied by enhanced keratinocyte activation and IL-22 receptor upregulation. Taken together, we demonstrate that dupilumab effectively dampens conventional type 2 inflammation in DAHND lesions, with concomitant hyperactivation of IL22-associated responses.

A Review of Dupilumab-Induced Adverse Events to Dermatologists and the Potential Pathogenesis in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 antibody, is approved for use in many type 2 inflammatory diseases, including atopic dermatitis. It is generally well tolerated with no need of routine laboratory monitoring. However, several adverse events have been reported during real-world practice and in pivotal trials. We conducted a systematic literature research of the PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases to identify articles recording the clinical manifestation and potential pathogenesis of these adverse events with interests (AEIs) to dermatologists. In total, 547 cases from 134 studies have developed 39 AEIs 1 day to 2.5 years after dupilumab treatment. The most common AEIs are facial and neck dermatitis (299 cases), psoriasis (70 cases), arthralgia (56 cases), alopecia (21 cases), cutaneous T cell lymphoma (19 cases), severe ocular diseases (19 cases), and drug eruption (6 cases). Most of the AEIs recorded in this review resolved or improved after dupilumab discontinuation or the addition of another treatment, whereas 3 of the cases died of severe AEI. The potential pathogenesis included T help type 1 (Th1)/T help type 2 (Th2) imbalance, Th2/T help type 17 (Th17) imbalance, immune reconstitution, hypersensitivity reaction, transient hypereosinophilia related, and Th1 suppression. Clinicians should be alert of these AEIs for timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Update on Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with a lifetime prevalence of up to 20% which can occur at any age but is most common among children. There is a significant burden of pediatric AD in the primary care setting; thus, the ability to recognize and manage AD is of utmost importance to pediatricians. Treatment of AD requires a multifaceted approach based on a patient's severity including behavioral modifications, topical and systemic pharmacologic therapies, and phototherapy.

Optimizing topical management of atopic dermatitis

OBJECTIVE

Provide a review of atopic dermatitis management, focusing on optimizing topical therapy, creating a stepwise approach for treatment plans, and providing guidance on when to start systemic therapy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed search of articles in the English language regarding atopic dermatitis in all ages.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles on the subject matter were selected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Topical corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for managing atopic dermatitis. Topical nonsteroidal agents, calcineurin inhibitors, crisaborole, and recently, ruxolitinib, which cause no cutaneous atrophy, are options for reducing the use of topical corticosteroids, including on sensitive sites. Emerging topical agents are in clinical trials. Proactive management, with continued application 2 to 3 times weekly of a midpotency topical corticosteroid or tacrolimus, may maintain control for clear (or almost clear) localized sites of dermatitis that rapidly recur when topical anti-inflammatory medication is stopped. If topical therapy alone cannot control disease and quality of life is impacted, reevaluation to confirm the diagnosis, manage comorbid conditions, address compliance and patient-specific concerns, and optimize topical therapy must be undertaken before deciding to advance to systemic medication. Dupilumab, an interleukin-4 receptor inhibitor, has become first-line systemic therapy given its efficacy and safety, allowing long-term treatment without laboratory monitoring. Other biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors are emerging as alternatives that could eliminate the need for immunosuppressants with their higher risks.

CONCLUSION

Several options are now available for topical treatment. A stepwise approach is needed to consider alternative therapies and diagnoses before advancing to systemic treatment, but the safety of newer immunomodulators will lower the threshold for more aggressive intervention.

Dupilumab Provides Acceptable Safety and Sustained Efficacy for up to 4 Years in an Open-Label Study of Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Background

Moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD) often requires long-term management with systemic therapies.

Objective

Our objective was to report the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment up to 4 years in adults with moderate-to-severe AD and efficacy in a subgroup of patients who transitioned from dupilumab once-weekly (qw) to administration every other week (q2w).

Methods

This interim analysis of the open-label extension study (NCT01949311) evaluated dupilumab 300 mg qw or q2w in adults previously enrolled in dupilumab trials for moderate-to-severe AD. Patients switched from qw to q2w following protocol amendment. The primary outcome was safety; efficacy was also assessed.

Results

Of 2677 patients enrolled and treated, 352 (13.1%) completed week 204 (end of efficacy assessments) and 202 (7.5%) completed safety follow-up through week 244. Self-reported compliance was 98.1%. Dupilumab’s safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥5%) included nasopharyngitis, AD, upper respiratory tract infection, oral herpes, conjunctivitis, injection-site reaction, and headache. At week 204, mean ± standard deviation (SD) Eczema Area and Severity Index was 2.46 ± 3.98, and mean percent change from parent study baseline (PSBL) was −91.07%; mean ± SD Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score was 2.10 ± 1.83, and mean percent change from PSBL was −68.74%. Efficacy was maintained in patients (n = 226) who transitioned from qw to q2w dosing. Limitations of this study included its open-label design, the lack of control arm, and smaller subsets of patients at later timepoints and receiving the approved q2w regimen.

Conclusion

These results support dupilumab as continuous long-term treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe AD; efficacy was sustained following transition from qw to q2w dosing.

Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT01949311.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40257-022-00685-0.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disease associated with inflamed skin and intense itching. People with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis often need long-term treatment, but many available treatments do not have demonstrated long-term safety data. In multiple clinical trials, dupilumab treatment resulted in significant improvements in signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis. This study examined the safety and efficacy of up to 4 years of dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, and whether dupilumab continued to be effective in patients who switched from receiving treatment each week to treatment every other week. To address these questions, we collected data from adults who received 300 milligrams of dupilumab every week or every other week. In this study, safety findings were consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. Patients' signs and symptoms were evaluated before and during treatment with evaluation tools including the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), which indicates the extent and severity of disease, and the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), which indicates the intensity of itching. Reductions of 91% in EASI scores and 69% in Pruritus NRS scores showed that the improvement in signs and symptoms persisted for 204 weeks (almost 4 years) of treatment, and these effects were sustained following the switch from weekly treatment to the approved every other week treatment with dupilumab. The safety and efficacy data presented here support the use of dupilumab as a continuous, long-term treatment for up to 4 years for adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Dupilumab-induced ocular surface disease: a primer

The management of atopic diseases has been revolutionised by precision therapies and biological drugs that target specific immune proteins. This report elucidates a unique complication from the use of the monoclonal antibody, dupilumab, that primary care providers and subspecialists need to be aware of. A patient in her 40s consulted us for severe atopic asthma, food allergy and eczema involving the face and body. She had previously failed treatments and was started on dupilumab (which binds to the interleukin-4 [IL4] receptor and inhibits both IL-4 and IL-13). She quickly achieved remission of asthma, rhinitis and eczema. Therapy was, however, complicated by severe blepharoconjunctivitis, dry eyes and periorbital dermatitis, consistent with dupilumab-induced ocular surface disease and dupilumab-associated mucin deficiency. Following aggressive treatment of ocular disease, the patient was able to continue dupilumab injections for asthma and eczema. It is presumed that dupilumab-induced cytokine imbalance results in ocular goblet cell dysfunction, mucin deficiency and ocular disease.

Adverse Reactions to Biologic Medications Used in Allergy and Immunology Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of biologic therapies has risen exponentially over recent years, allowing for unprecedented disease control within numerous areas of Allergy/Immunology. With this expanded use, awareness and understanding of adverse reactions to biologic agents have also increased.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple biologic adverse reaction phenotypes have been described, but significant overlap in clinical features across phenotypes exists. Given considerable phenotypic overlap, a targeted testing approach may not always be clear, and more recent classifications focus on management decision making using tools of diagnostic challenges and rapid drug desensitizations, guiding clinicians in developing a management plan when the exact underlying mechanism is not clearly known. With increased clinical experience with omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, rituximab, and TNF-inhibitors, there is a growing appreciation to the spectrum and particularities of adverse reactions to these agents which are outlined in this review. Our understanding of the clinical presentation and management of adverse reactions to biologic medications encountered in Allergy/Immunology has grown. Opportunities remain to further define optimal diagnostic and management strategies for these reactions.