Racial and ethnic differences in barriers to care among US adults with chronic inflammatory skin diseases: A cross-sectional study of the All of Us Research Program

Emergency versus Outpatient Care for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis: A Population-Based Study of Sociodemographic Factors and Health Care Utilization

OBJECTIVE

To examine sociodemographic differences in pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) visits between emergency and outpatient settings.

STUDY DESIGN

We used the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to identify emergency and outpatient visits for pediatric AD patients from 2009-2016 to 2018-2019.

RESULTS

We identified 16 712 960 visits for pediatric AD (weighted). We identified differences in race/ethnicity and payment source between emergency and outpatient pediatric AD visits. In emergency settings, more pediatric AD visits were for Hispanic patients and patients with public insurance. In outpatient settings, more pediatric AD visits were for non-Hispanic White patients and patients with private insurance. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that pediatric AD patients seen in emergency settings were over 5 times more likely to be Hispanic than non-Hispanic White (aOR 5.34, P < .01) and over 5 times more likely to have public insurance than private insurance (aOR 5.21, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric AD patients seen in emergency settings were more likely to be Hispanic and have public insurance. Future research may explore how to improve health care access and utilization for all pediatric AD patients.

Race and appointment availability influence continuity of care for chronic inflammatory skin disease: A cross-sectional study of United States practice data

BACKGROUND

In the management of chronic inflammatory skin disease (CISD), continuity of care may influence the achievement of long-term disease control. Barriers to care have been identified in this population, which may leave some patients more vulnerable to loss of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to identify predictors of continuity of care for CISD patients across demographic groups and health care practice types in the United States.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data was conducted on US outpatient CISD visits between 2011 and 2019 including a primary diagnosis of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, acne, or rosacea.

RESULTS

A total of 2747 visits, estimating 75.4 (95% CI: 70.9-79.9) million CISD encounters were identified during the period. Multivariate regression showed that Black patients had lower odds of establishing continuity of care relative to White patients (P < .01). Practices offering same-day visits had greater odds for patients with continuity (P < .05). Conversely, practices with lower overall wait times (≤1 month) were less likely to be associated with continuity of care (P < .01).

LIMITATIONS

Disease severity data were unavailable.

CONCLUSION

Both patient race and appointment availability predict differences in continuity of care, suggesting vulnerabilities may exist for some CISD patients requiring follow-up.

Large-scale analysis highlights obesity as a risk factor for chronic, non-communicable inflammatory diseases

Background

Overweight and obesity are a global pandemic, contributing to death and disability-adjusted life-years. Obesity is a major factor in the onset of chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs). Yet, several knowledge gaps remain: For several CIDs, inconsistent results have been reported, relating to their obesity-imposed risk, data on most rare CIDs remain unavailable, sex differences and racial disparities remain mostly unaddressed.

Methods

A large-scale cohort study compared the risk of developing 46 CIDs in individuals with overweight/obesity (n=3,101,824) to an equal number of non-overweight/obese individuals. Propensity score matching optimized between-group comparability, and sensitivity analyses assessed study robustness.

Results

The risk of developing any CID was 28.48% in overweight/obese individuals versus 17.55% in non-overweight/obese controls, with a hazard ratio (95%-confidence interval) of 1.52 (1.509-1.521, p<0.0001). This risk was consistent across all sensitivity, sex-, and race-stratified analyses. Overweight and obesity were associated with an increased risk for 24 of 46 CIDs in the primary analysis and all sensitivity analyses. For 12 diseases, increased risks were confirmed to one of the two sensitivity analyses, while for 10 diseases, results were discordant. No increased risk was observed for one disease. In sex-stratified analysis, overweight and obesity posed a more pronounced risk for four CIDs in female individuals. In race-stratified analysis, overweight and obesity were linked to a higher risk for seven CIDs in White individuals and to one CID in "Black or African American" individuals.

Conclusion

Overweight and obesity increase the risk for the majority of CIDs in a sex- and race-specific manner.

Childcare as a social determinant of access to healthcare: a scoping review

Introduction

As health systems strive to screen for and address social determinants of health (SDOH), the role of access to childcare and barriers to healthcare posed by childcare needs remains underexplored. A gap exists in synthesizing existing evidence on the role of access to childcare as a SDOH.

Methods

This scoping review aimed to examine and analyze existing literature on the role of childcare needs as a social determinant of access to healthcare. We conducted a structured literature search across PubMed, Scopus, health policy fora, and professional healthcare societies to inclusively aggregate studies across interdisciplinary sources published between January 2000 and June 2023. Two independent reviewers reviewed results to determine inclusions and exclusions. Studies were coded into salient themes utilizing an iterative inductive approach.

Results

Among 535 search results, 526 met criteria for eligibility screening. Among 526 eligible studies, 91 studies met inclusion criteria for analysis. Five key themes were identified through data analysis: (1) barriers posed by childcare needs to healthcare appointments, (2) the opportunity for alternative care delivery models to overcome childcare barriers, (3) the effect of childcare needs on participation in medical research, (4) the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on childcare needs, and (5) the disproportionate burden of childcare experienced by vulnerable populations.

Discussion

Childcare needs remain underexplored in existing research. Current evidence demonstrates the relevance of childcare needs as a barrier to healthcare access, however dedicated studies are lacking. Future research is needed to understand mechanisms of childcare barriers in access to healthcare and explore potential interventions.

Racial and ethnic disparities in treatment refusal for head and neck cutaneous malignancies

Racial and ethnic minorities with skin cancer experience disproportionately worse prognoses and adverse outcomes compared to non-Hispanic, White patients. We analyzed patients diagnosed with any cutaneous malignancies of the head and neck between 2010 to 2021 using the data from the National Cancer Database to quantify disparities. The primary outcome variable was treatment refusal, and secondary variables included days from diagnosis to treatment, tumor depth, and mortality. Among the 151,733 patients analyzed, most were non-Hispanic White (99%) and male (71%). Black patients had the greatest odds of treatment refusal (4.166, 95% CI: 2.054-8.452, p < 0.001) across all cutaneous malignancies of the head and neck. Black and Hispanic patients also had increased times from diagnosis to treatment (p < 0.001). Black patients had higher odds of 90-day mortality compared to non-Hispanic White patients (p < 0.001). This coincided with greater tumor depth in Black and Hispanic patients compared to that of non-Hispanic White patients (p < 0.001). Black patients were more likely to refuse treatment for head and neck cutaneous malignancies. Moreover, Black and Hispanic patients experienced more treatment delays. These findings may relate to the increased 90-day mortality among Black patients and increased tumor depth in Black and Hispanic patients. Further investigation into the quality of life and functional impairment is warranted alongside interventions to reduce these disparities.

Racial and ethnic differences in healthcare access and utilization among U.S. adults with melanoma and keratinocyte carcinomas in the NIH All of Us Research Program

There is a paucity of information on racial and ethnic disparities relating to barriers to care in healthcare access and utilization in patients with cutaneous malignancies. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adults with melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) All of Us Research Program collected between May 2018 and July 2022. Participants included adults (aged 18 or older) with cutaneous malignancy who completed the Health Care Access and Utilization survey. We identified 5,817 adults who were diagnosed with BCC (67%), cSCC (28.9%), and melanoma (23.9%). Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic patients were more likely than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients to delay a primary care visit due to cost (p = 0.005 and p = 0.015, respectively). NHB patients were also more likely to delay care due to lack of transportation (p < 0.001). NHB and Hispanic patients were more likely to place importance on seeing a provider from the same background (NHB p < 0.002; Hispanic p = 0.002) and also were more likely to report never being able to see such a provider (NHB p < 0.001; Hispanic p = 0.002). Medicaid/Medicare patients, non-college graduates, and those with lower incomes also faced increased barriers to care, including delays due to cost and transportation issues. People of color with cutaneous malignancies are more likely to delay care in seeing primary care providers due to cost or transportation issues. This study provides important insights on disproportionate healthcare usage among racial/ethnic groups that may help mitigate healthcare disparities.

Barriers to care and health-related quality of life among US adults with several common chronic inflammatory skin diseases: a cross-sectional analysis of the NIH All of Us Research Program

Research investigating the impact of barriers to care on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among US adults with chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISDs) is limited. In this study, we utilize multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to analyze the associations between cost barriers (e.g., delaying specialist and mental health care due to cost) and non-cost barriers (e.g., delaying care due to transportation issues and the lack of provider diversity) with HRQoL among US adults with several common CISDs in the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program (AoURP). Among the 19,208 adults with CISDs included in our analysis, the prevalence of poorer HRQoL(i.e., "fair" or "poor" HRQoL) was significantly higher among adults with CISDs who experienced cost (aOR, 2.39;95% CI, 2.10-2.73) and non-cost barriers (aOR, 2.52; 95% CI, 2.20-2.88) than those with CISDs who did not experience those barriers. Since dermatologists are often the only physician caring for patients with CISDs, this study reinforces the critical role dermatologists have in addressing social determinants of health and advocating to reduce cost and non-cost barriers for their patients with CISDs.

Atopic dermatitis: A global health perspective

The International Society of AD (ISAD) organized a roundtable on global aspects of AD at the WCD 2023 in Singapore. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) consortium, at least 171 million individuals were affected with AD in 2019, corresponding to 2.23% of the world population, with age-standardized prevalence and incidence rates that were relatively stable from 1990 to 2019. Based on the panel experience, most AD cases are mild-to-moderate. Without parallel data on disease prevalence and severity, the GBD data are difficult to interpret in many regions. This gap is particularly important in countries with limited medical infrastructure, but indirect evidence suggests a significant burden of AD in low-and-medium resource settings, especially urban areas. The Singapore roundtable was an opportunity to compare experiences in World Bank category 1 (Madagascar and Mali), 3 (Brazil, China) and 4 (Australia, Germany, Qatar, USA, Singapore, Japan) countries. The panel concluded that current AD guidelines are not adapted for low resource settings and a more pragmatic approach, as developed by WHO for skin NTDs, would be advisable for minimal access to moisturizers and topical corticosteroids. The panel also recommended prioritizing prevention studies, regardless of the level of existing resources. For disease long-term control in World Bank category 3 and most category 4 countries, the main problem is not access to drugs for most mild-to-moderate cases, but rather poor compliance due to insufficient time at visits. Collaboration with WHO, patient advocacy groups and industry may promote global change, improve capacity training and fight current inequalities. Finally, optimizing management of AD and its comorbidities needs more action at the primary care level, because reaching specialist care is merely aspirational in most settings. Primary care empowerment with store and forward telemedicine and algorithms based on augmented intelligence is a future goal.

Patient-reported assessment of medical care for chronic inflammatory skin diseases: an enterprise-based survey

Background

Chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISDs) are among the most common diseases in the Western world. Current estimates of medical care for CISDs are primarily based on surveys among patients in medical care facilities and on health insurance data.

Aim

Survey-based examination to what extent CISD patients in health-aware environment consider their skin disease to be controlled.

Methods

The survey of CISD patients was carried out in 2022 among the employees of a pharmaceutical company located in Germany and Switzerland. Software-based, anonymous, self-reported questionnaires were used.

Results

The number of employees, who answered the questionnaire, was 905. Of these, 222 participants (24.5%) reported having at least one CISD. 28.7% of participants with CISD described their disease as being hardly or not controlled. Regarding the nature of disease, more than one third of participants suffering from hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) or psoriasis fell into the hardly/not controlled category. In contrast, the largest proportion of participants with chronic spontaneous urticaria (43%) or atopic dermatitis (42%) considered their CISD to be completely or well controlled. Only 35.5% of CISD sufferers stated that they were currently under medical care for their skin condition. Being under medical care, however, had no influence on the extent CISD sufferers considered their skin disease to be controlled. The number of active CISD episodes but not the total number of symptomatic days per year was negatively associated with poor disease control (p = 0.042 and p = 0.856, respectively). Poor disease control had a negative effect on the personal and professional lives of those affected, as deduced from its positive association with the extent of daily activity impairment and presenteeism (p = 0.005 and p = 0.005, respectively). Moreover, 41.4 and 20.7% of participants with hardly/not controlled disease stated that their CISD had a moderate and severe or very severe impact on their overall lives (p < 0.001), respectively. A severe or very severe impact of their CISD on their overall life was most commonly reported by participants with HS.

Conclusion

Medical care for CISDs, even in an environment with high socio-economic standard and high health-awareness, still appears to be limited and has a negative impact on individuals and society.

Abrocitinib efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis by race, ethnicity, and Fitzpatrick skin type

BACKGROUND

Response to abrocitinib treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not been evaluated across racial and ethnic subpopulations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib on the basis of patient race, ethnicity, and Fitzpatrick skin type (FST).

METHODS

Data were pooled post hoc from patients treated with abrocitinib 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo in 3 monotherapy trials (NCT02780167, NCT03349060, and NCT03575871). Race and ethnicity were self-reported; FST was determined by study investigators. Evaluations through Week 12 include the following: (1) Investigator's Global Assessment of clear or almost-clear skin; (2) greater than or equal to 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index or SCORing AD; (3) a greater-than-or-equal-to 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score; (4) least squares mean changes in Dermatology Life Quality Index and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores; and (5) treatment-emergent adverse events.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 628 White, 204 Asian, and 83 Black patients; 37 were Hispanic or Latino; 624 had FST I to III and 320 had FST IV to VI. Treatment with either abrocitinib dose was associated with greater proportions of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment of clear or almost-clear skin, ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index, ≥ 75% improvement in SCORing AD, and a ≥ 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, or greater score changes from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure vs placebo regardless of race, ethnicity, or FST. Dose-response was most prominent in White patients. In Black patients, the effects of the 2 doses were similar. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common in White and Black than in Asian patients.

CONCLUSION

Abrocitinib was more efficacious than placebo across the racial and ethnic groups and ranges of phototypes analyzed. Studies with increased representation of populations of color are warranted to elucidate potential variations in response across diverse populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02780167 (phase 2b), NCT03349060 (phase 3 MONO-1), and NCT03575871 (phase 3 MONO-2).

Evaluation of Stigma Toward Individuals With Acne

Importance

Little is known about the prevalence and magnitude of stigmatizing attitudes of the general public toward individuals with acne.

Objective

To explore the degree of stigma toward individuals with acne and whether these attitudes vary based on characteristics of the individuals with acne or of the survey participants.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cross-sectional internet survey study, 4 stock portraits of adults that varied in sex (male/female) and skin tone (light/dark) were digitally enhanced to have acne (mild/severe). One of these 12 images was randomly presented to survey participants, who subsequently answered questions regarding stigmatizing attitudes with respect to the pictured individual, such as desire for social distance and stereotype endorsement. The survey was administered to a convenience sample of adult respondents in the US who were volunteers on the ResearchMatch platform.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Prevalence and magnitude of stigma toward individuals with acne.

Results

The survey was completed by 1357 respondents (65.7% completion rate) (mean [SD] age, 42.4 [14.3] years; 918 [67.7%] female, 439 [32.4%] male). Compared to those with no acne, for those with severe acne, participants reported less comfort being friends (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -0.28 [-0.47 to -0.10]; P = .003), hiring (-0.33 [-0.51 to -0.15]; P < .001), having physical contact (-0.26 [-0.45 to -0.08]; P = .006), dating (-0.44 [-0.74 to -0.14]; P = .004), and posting a photograph together on social media (-0.50 [-0.70 to -0.30]; P < .001). Compared to those with no acne, participants were more likely to rate individuals with severe acne as having poor hygiene (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -1.04 [-1.46 to -0.82]; P < .001) and being unattractive (-0.89 [-1.12 to -0.67]; P < .001), unintelligent (-0.42 [-0.63 to -0.22]; P < .001), unlikable (-0.36 [-0.56 to -0.15]; P < .001), immature (-0.52 [-0.74 to -0.30]; P < .001), and untrustworthy (-0.40 [-0.61 to -0.18]; P < .001). There was evidence that the effect size of the association of acne with desire to social distance was greater for individuals with dark skin.

Conclusions and Relevance

This survey study demonstrates that stigmatizing attitudes toward patients with acne existed across a variety of social and professional scenarios, with severe acne and acne in darker skin tone being associated with a greater degree of stigma. These findings highlight the need to identify approaches to reduce stigmatizing attitudes in the community and for adequate access to care, which might prevent negative downstream effects related to these stigmatizing attitudes.

Barriers to Care Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals With Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases in the US

Importance

Research on the prevalence of barriers to care among sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISDs) in the US is limited.

Objective

To compare the prevalence of cost and noncost barriers to care among SGM and non-SGM patients with CISDs and to analyze the prevalence of barriers based on SGM status and race and ethnicity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A cross-sectional study of health care access and utilization survey data collected by the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program between May 31, 2017, and July 1, 2022, was conducted. Participants were adults aged 18 years or older with CISDs who enrolled in All of Us directly online or through partner health care practitioner organizations located across the US.

Exposures

Chronic inflammatory skin diseases, sexual orientation and gender identity, and race and ethnicity.

Main Outcome and Measures

The main outcome was the experience of cost and noncost barriers to health care among SGM patients with CISDs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of SGM status with experiencing barriers to care.

Results

This study included 19 743 patients with CISDs; 1877 were SGM patients (median age, 40.5 years [IQR, 28.7-57.9 years]; 1205 [64.2%] assigned female sex at birth) and 17 866 were non-SGM patients (median age, 57.1 years [IQR, 40.8-68.1 years]; 13 205 [73.9%] assigned female sex at birth). Compared with non-SGM patients, SGM patients with CISDs were significantly more likely to delay specialist care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47), mental health care (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.37-1.91), and filling a prescription (AOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.52) because of cost. In addition, SGM patients with CISDs were significantly more likely than non-SGM patients to delay care because of transportation issues (AOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22-1.80) and not having a health care practitioner who shares the same background with regard to race and ethnicity, religion, native language, sexual orientation, and gender identity (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.62). Sexual and gender minority patients with CISDs were also significantly more likely than non-SGM patients to report not always being treated with respect by their health care practitioners (AOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.30-1.65).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cross-sectional study of survey data suggest that SGM patients with CISDs may be disproportionately affected by cost and noncost barriers to health care. Dermatologists and other health care practitioners caring for SGM patients with CISDs have an important role in helping to address these barriers and larger systemic issues for SGM patients at both the patient and system levels.

Isolation and survival: The impact of local and MSA isolation on survival among non-Hispanic Black women diagnosed with breast cancer in the United States using a SEER-Medicare cohort

BACKGROUND

Residential segregation is an important factor that negatively impacts cancer disparities, yet studies yield mixed results and complicate clear recommendations for policy change and public health intervention. In this study, we examined the relationship between local and Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) measures of Black isolation (segregation) and survival among older non-Hispanic (NH) Black women with breast cancer (BC) in the United States. We hypothesized that the influence of local isolation on mortality varies based on MSA isolation-specifically, that high local isolation may be protective in the context of highly segregated MSAs, as ethnic density may offer opportunities for social support and buffer racialized groups from the harmful influences of racism.

METHODS

Local and MSA measures of isolation were linked by Census Tract (CT) with a SEER-Medicare cohort of 5,231 NH Black women aged 66-90 years with an initial diagnosis of stage I-IV BC in 2007-2013 with follow-up through 2018. Proportional and cause-specific hazards models and estimated marginal means were used to examine the relationship between local and MSA isolation and all-cause and BC-specific mortality, accounting for covariates (age, comorbidities, tumor stage, and hormone receptor status).

FINDINGS

Of 2,599 NH Black women who died, 40.0% died from BC. Women experienced increased risk for all-cause mortality when living in either high local (HR = 1.20; CI = 1.08-1.33; p < 0.001) or high MSA isolation (HR = 1.40; CI = 1.17-1.67; p < 0.001). A similar trend existed for BC-specific mortality. Pairwise comparisons for all-cause mortality models showed that high local isolation was hazardous in less isolated MSAs but was not significant in more isolated MSAs.

INTERPRETATION

Both local and MSA isolation are independently associated with poorer overall and BC-specific survival for older NH Black women. However, the impact of local isolation on survival appears to depend on the metropolitan area's level of segregation. Specifically, in highly segregated MSAs, living in an area with high local isolation is not significantly associated with poorer survival. While the reasons for this are not ascertained in this study, it is possible that the protective qualities of ethnic density (e.g., social support and buffering from experiences of racism) may have a greater role in more segregated MSAs, serving as a counterpart to the hazardous qualities of local isolation. More research is needed to fully understand these complex relationships.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute.

[Inflammatory dermatoses in skin of color]

Acne, rosacea, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis vulgaris are common inflammatory dermatoses. Of note, the epidemiology and clinical presentation of these common dermatologic diseases varies considerably between people with different colors of skin. Yet, most dermatology textbooks present and describe the clinical pictures of White people. To provide excellent dermatological care for all patients, it is of central importance to know the epidemiology and recognize key clinical characteristics of these diseases in patients with skin of color (SOC). In acne, cultural habits of Blacks (use of steroid-based lighteners, comedogenic hair care products) may lead to manifestation of specific forms of acne. In addition, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and keloids pose particular therapeutic challenges in this patient group. Atopic dermatitis in Asians shows a clinical and histological picture that is similar to psoriasis in Whites. By contrast, atopic dermatitis manifests on the extensor side in Black people. Due to the difficulty of recognizing erythema in SOC, the severity of the respective inflammatory diseases in these individuals is often underestimated. The treatment of acne, rosacea, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis does not differ between people of different skin colors. The exception is the necessary therapy for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in all the inflammatory dermatoses mentioned, and for keloids in acne.