Lipoprotein(a) and Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in a Multi-Ethnic Pooled Prospective Cohort

Lipoprotein(a) and recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular events: the US Family Heart Database

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Higher levels of lipoprotein(a) drive increasing risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in otherwise healthy individuals regardless of sex and race/ethnicity. This study aimed to evaluate whether this is also true for recurrent ASCVD, and whether LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy possibly mitigates such a relationship.

METHODS

In US medical claims between 2012 and 2022 for 340 million individuals, 273 770 had diagnosed ASCVD and lipoprotein(a) measured in nmol/L. These women (n = 117 269; 43%) and men (n = 156 501; 57%) included Black (n = 22 451; 8%), Hispanic (n = 24 606; 9%), and White (n = 161 165; 59%) individuals.

RESULTS

Lipoprotein(a) levels were higher in women vs men and in Black vs Hispanic and White individuals. During a median follow-up of 5.4 years, 41 687 individuals (15%) experienced recurrent ASCVD. Higher lipoprotein(a) levels were associated with continuously increasing risk of recurrent ASCVD. Compared to individuals with lipoprotein(a) < 15 nmol/L, the adjusted hazard ratios for recurrent ASCVD events were 1.04 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.07) for 15-79 nmol/L, 1.15 (1.12-1.19) for 80-179 nmol/L, 1.29 (1.25-1.33) for 180-299 nmol/L, and 1.45 (1.39-1.51) for ≥300 nmol/L. Results were similar for individual ASCVD components, and in sex, race/ethnicity, baseline ASCVD, and diabetes subgroups; however, high impact LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy possibly mitigates the deleterious effect of lipoprotein(a) ≥ 180 nmol/L, most pronounced in those on PCSK9 inhibitors. Interaction on recurrent ASCVD events between lipoprotein(a) categories and sex, race/ethnicity, baseline ASCVD, diabetes, and impact of LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy use had P-values of .61, .06, .33, .91, and 2 × 10-8, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In 273 770 individuals with ASCVD, higher lipoprotein(a) levels were associated with continuously increasing risk of recurrent ASCVD events regardless of sex and race/ethnicity that may have been partially mitigated by high impact LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy.

Lipoprotein(a) and Its Association with Coronary Heart Disease: Data from a Large Cohort in the Russian

Aim      To study the distribution of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in a large sample of the adult population of the Russian Federation depending on gender and age, and the Lp(a) association with the incidence of ischemic heart disease (IHD).Material and methods  Cross-analysis of electronic medical records of patients older than 18 years managed in the MEDSI Group of Companies as a part of primary and secondary prevention.Results Among 73,763 patients, the mean age was 45 [37; 56] years, 57.3% were women. The median Lp(a) concentration was 11 [6.0; 32.0] mg/dl. The median Lp(a) concentration in women was higher than in men, 12.0 and 10.5 mg/dl, respectively (p<0.0001). Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) (Lp(a) >30 mg/dl) was diagnosed in 26% (n=19,188) of patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 25.7-26.3), statistically significant association with IHD was observed over the entire range of elevated Lp(a) concentrations (p<0.001). Extremely high Lp(a) concentrations exceeding 180 mg/dl were detected in 852 (1.2%) of patients, and 210 of them were diagnosed with IHD. Logistic regression analysis confirmed a significant association between Lp(a) concentrations and IHD (odds ratio (OR) 1.006; 95% CI 1.003-1.008; p<0.001). With an increase in Lp(a) by 1 mg/dl, the likelihood of having IHD increased by 1.006 times. With Lp(a) >50 mg/dL, the likelihood of IHD increased by 1.32 times (OR 1.320; 95% CI 1.254-1.390; p<0.001), with Lp(a) >180 mg/dL, by 2.06 times (OR 2.058; 95% CI 1.758-2.408), and with Lp(a) 30-50 mg/dL, by 1.1 times (OR 1.100; 95% CI 1.017-1.188; p=0.016).Conclusion      Every fourth person has an elevated Lp(a) concentration, which determines a high risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. Taking into account the accumulated data, early assessment of the Lp(a) concentration is necessary for all adults.

Elevated lipoprotein(a) is not linked to coronary artery calcification incidence or progression

AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, its role in coronary artery calcification (CAC) remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether Lp(a) levels are associated with the incidence and progression of CAC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study (2015-22) of 41 929 adults (aged ≥30 years) who underwent baseline Lp(a) measurement and CAC assessment via multi-detector computed tomography. Participants were stratified into those with baseline CAC = 0 (n = 32 338) and CAC > 0 (n = 9591). Outcomes were analysed according to Lp(a) quintiles and clinically relevant categories (<30, 30-50, 50-100, ≥ 100 mg/dL). Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for incident CAC (CAC > 0) among those with CAC = 0 (median follow-up, 4.04 years). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated CAC progression among those with CAC > 0 (median follow-up, 3.78 years). All models were adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors. Among participants with CAC = 0 (mean age, 40.94 ± 5.81 years; 85.69% men), neither Lp(a) quintiles nor clinical categories were significantly associated with incident CAC [HR for highest vs. second quintile: 0.998 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.90-1.10); HR for ≥100 vs. <30 mg/dL: 0.83 (95% CI, 0.57-1.23)]. Among those with CAC > 0 (mean age, 45.99 ± 7.20 years; 94.90% men), CAC progression did not differ materially across Lp(a) quintiles or clinical thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) levels were not associated with new-onset CAC or progression of existing CAC in this large longitudinal cohort.

Association of Lp(a) With Stroke and Cerebral Injury on MRI: Insights From the HCHS/SOL (Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos) and Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging MRI (SOL-INCA MRI)

BACKGROUND

Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, its association with cerebrovascular disease is not as well established.

METHODS

Data from a population-based cohort of Hispanics/Latinos included 16 333 individuals with baseline Lp(a) levels (nmol/L) and self-reported prevalent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). A subset of 2642 individuals with brain magnetic resonance imaging was also included. Linear and multivariate logistic regression assessed the association of Lp(a) with (1) self-reported stroke or TIA, (2) cerebral injury defined as self-reported stroke or TIA or evidence of a stroke on brain magnetic resonance imaging, (3) white matter hyperintensity volume, and (4) silent brain infarcts. Sampling weights were utilized given the HCHS/SOL (Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos) complex sample design.

RESULTS

Mean age±SE was 41.1±0.3 years, 52.0% female, and median interquartile range (Q1, Q3) Lp(a) level of 19.7 (7.3-60.6) nmol/L; brain magnetic resonance imaging subset mean age±SE was 49.9±0.4 years, 56.4% female, and median (interquartile range) Lp(a) level of 21.7 (8.1-62.9) nmol/L. Each unit increase in log-transformed Lp(a) was associated with higher odds of self-reported stroke or TIA (odds ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.01-1.27]; P=0.03). Lp(a) levels in the highest quintile (>77 nmol/L) were significantly associated with higher odds of prevalent stroke or TIA compared with Lp(a) <6 nmol/L (first quintile: odds ratio, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.09-2.77]; P=0.02). The highest proportion of cerebral injury was noted in Q5, while the lowest proportion was noted in Q2. When comparing Lp(a) >77 nmol/L with Lp(a) of 6 to <13 nmol/L (second quintile), a significant association was found between Lp(a) and cerebral injury that persisted after fully adjusted models (odds ratio, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.05-3.93]; P=0.03). Each unit increase in log-Lp(a) was associated with a 0.10 increase in log-white matter hyperintensity (β, 0.10; P=0.005). No significant association was found between Lp(a) and silent brain infarcts.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) is independently and significantly associated with prevalent stroke/TIA, and white matter hyperintensity, in a large diverse population of Hispanics/Latinos.

2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2025 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2024 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. This year's edition includes a continued focus on health equity across several key domains and enhanced global data that reflect improved methods and incorporation of ≈3000 new data sources since last year's Statistical Update.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Lipoprotein(a) as a Causal Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease

Purpose of Review

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an atherogenic low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-like molecule, has emerged as an important risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This review summarizes the evidence supporting Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for ASCVD and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS).

Recent Findings

Lp(a) is largely (~ 90%) genetically determined and approximately 20% of the global population has elevated Lp(a). The unique structure of Lp(a) leads to proatherogenic, proinflammatory, and antifibrinolytic properties. Data from epidemiological, genome-wide association, Mendelian randomization, and meta-analyses have shown a clear association between Lp(a) and ASCVD, as well as CAVS. There are emerging data on the association between Lp(a) and ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial disease, and heart failure; however, the associations are not as strong.

Summary

Several lines of evidence support Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for ASCVD and CAVS. The 2024 National Lipid Association guidelines, 2022 European Atherosclerosis Society, and 2021 Canadian Cardiology Society guidelines recommend testing Lp(a) once in all adults to guide primary prevention efforts. Further studies on cardiovascular outcomes with Lp(a) targeted therapies will provide more insight on causal relationship between Lp(a) and cardiovascular disease.

Lipoprotein(a) as a Pharmacological Target: Premises, Promises, and Prospects

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is a major health concern worldwide and requires effective preventive measures. Lp(a) (lipoprotein [a]) has recently garnered attention as an independent risk factor for astherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with proinflammatory and prothrombotic mechanisms contributing to its atherogenicity. On an equimolar basis, Lp(a) is ~5 to 6 times more atherogenic than particles that have been widely associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as LDL (low-density lipoprotein). Lp(a) can enter the vessel wall, leading to the accumulation of oxidized phospholipids in the arterial intima, which are crucial for initiating plaque inflammation and triggering vascular disease progression. In addition, Lp(a) may cause atherothrombosis through interactions between apoA (apolipoprotein A) and the platelet PAR-1 (protease-activated receptor 1) receptor, as well as competitive inhibition of plasminogen. Because Lp(a) is mostly determined on genetic bases, a 1-time assessment in a lifetime can suffice to identify patients with elevated levels. Mendelian randomization studies and post hoc analyses of randomized trials of LDL cholesterol-lowering drugs showed a causal link between Lp(a) concentrations and cardiovascular outcomes, with therapeutic reduction of Lp(a) expected to contribute to estimated cardiovascular risk mitigation. Many Lp(a)-lowering drugs, including monoclonal antibodies, small interfering ribonucleic acids, antisense oligonucleotides, small molecules, and gene editing compounds, are at different stages of clinical investigation and show promise for clinical use. In particular, increased Lp(a) testing and treatment are expected to have a substantial impact at the population level, enabling the identification of high-risk individuals and the subsequent prevention of a large number of cardiovascular events. Ongoing phase 3 trials will further elucidate the cardiovascular benefits of Lp(a) reduction over the long term, offering potential avenues for targeted interventions and improved cardiovascular outcomes.

[Lp(a): What we know, what we don't know and what we hope for]

There is no doubt that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a structurally complex molecule with unique biological functions. It plays an important role in the inflammatory process through multiple mechanisms, contributes to endothelial dysfunction, activation of monocytes, macrophages and proliferation of smooth muscle cells, and promotes the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). It is important to point out the complex bidirectional relationship between Lp(a) and inflammation, influencing one another and even exerting anti-inflammatory effects in certain situations. Likewise, Lp(a) can favor the development of heart valve disease, especially of the aortic valve. Numerous publications emphasize the need to determine Lp(a) levels in the population at least once in life and possible strategies to mitigate the risk of ASCVD generated by high Lp(a) levels. However, doubts or lack of knowledge persist about the need to measure this parameter, either due to the uncertainty of how to manage patients with high levels of Lp(a), due to insufficient knowledge about its physiological function or because its levels persist unchanged, to a large extent, throughout life as the genetic character of this molecule takes precedence. On the other hand, there are still no specific approved therapies that reduce its levels and arouse sufficient interest for its management. However, many societies, such as the European Society of Cardiology (SEC) or the Spanish Society of Atherosclerosis (SEA), raise the need to determine Lp(a) and intensive management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with high Lp(a) levels along with therapies that mitigate the associated ASCVD risk. Likewise, the identification of high levels of Lp(a) offers the opportunity to screen family members, better control of cardiovascular risk and the possibility of developing clinical trials that profile individual and population risk that allow for more personalized actions.

Lipoprotein(a) Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score Development and Prediction in Primary Prevention From Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); however, there are few algorithms incorporating Lp(a), especially from real-world settings. We developed an electronic health record (EHR)-based risk prediction algorithm including Lp(a).

METHODS

Utilizing a large EHR database, we categorized Lp(a) cut points at 25, 50, and 75 mg/dL and constructed 10-year ASCVD risk prediction models incorporating Lp(a), with external validation in a pooled cohort of 4 US prospective studies. Net reclassification improvement was determined among borderline-intermediate risk patients.

RESULTS

We included 5902 patients aged ≥18 years (mean age 48.7±16.7 years, 51.2% women, and 7.7% Black). Our EHR model included Lp(a), age, sex, Black race/ethnicity, systolic blood pressure, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension medication. Over a mean follow-up of 6.8 years, ASCVD event rates (per 1000 person-years) ranged from 8.7 to 16.7 across Lp(a) groups. A 25 mg/dL increment in Lp(a) was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.10-1.37) for composite ASCVD. Those with Lp(a) ≥75 mg/dL had an 88% higher risk of ASCVD (hazard ratio, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.30-2.70]) and more than double the risk of incident stroke (hazard ratio, 2.55 [95% CI, 1.54-4.23]). C-statistics for our EHR and EHR+Lp(a) models in our EHR training data set were 0.7475 and 0.7556, respectively, with external validation in our pooled cohort (n=21 864) of 0.7350 and 0.7368, respectively. Among those at borderline/intermediate risk, the net reclassification improvement was 21.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

We show the feasibility of developing an improved ASCVD risk prediction model incorporating Lp(a) based on a real-world adult clinic population. The inclusion of Lp(a) in ASCVD prediction models can reclassify risk in patients who may benefit from more intensified ASCVD prevention efforts.

Independence of Lipoprotein(a) and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Mediated Cardiovascular Risk: A Participant-Level Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels are independently associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the relationship between Lp(a) level, LDL-C level, and ASCVD risk at different thresholds is not well defined.

METHODS

A participant-level meta-analysis of 27 658 participants enrolled in 6 placebo-controlled statin trials was performed to assess the association of LDL-C and Lp(a) levels with risk of fatal or nonfatal coronary heart disease events, stroke, or any coronary or carotid revascularization (ASCVD). The multivariable-adjusted association between baseline Lp(a) level and ASCVD risk was modeled continuously using generalized additive models, and the association between baseline LDL-C level and ASCVD risk by baseline Lp(a) level by Cox proportional hazards models with random effects. The joint association between Lp(a) level and statin-achieved LDL-C level with ASCVD risk was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Compared with an Lp(a) level of 5 mg/dL, increasing levels of Lp(a) were log-linearly associated with ASCVD risk in statin- and placebo-treated patients. Among statin-treated individuals, those with Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL (≈125 nmol/L) had increased risk across all quartiles of achieved LDL-C level and absolute change in LDL-C level. Even among those with the lowest quartile of achieved LDL-C level (3.1-77.0 mg/dL), those with Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL had greater ASCVD risk (hazard ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.06-1.79]) than those with Lp(a) level ≤50 mg/dL. The greatest risk was observed with both Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL and LDL-C level in the fourth quartile (hazard ratio, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.46-2.48]).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the independent and additive nature of Lp(a) and LDL-C levels for ASCVD risk, and that LDL-C lowering does not fully offset Lp(a)-mediated risk.

Statins-Their Effect on Lipoprotein(a) Levels

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) serum concentration plays a crucial role as a risk factor in cardiovascular diseases and is gaining more and more attention. Patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are often prescribed statins as they also have high concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Statins are drugs that successfully decrease LDL-C, but their effectiveness in Lp(a) levels reduction is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate if statin therapy can affect Lp(a) concentration. A literature search on databases like PubMed, Oxford Academic, ScienceDirect, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Springer Link was conducted from 1 May to 10 August 2024 with the aim of finding studies concerning the effect of statins on Lp(a) levels. Only randomised control studies and studies with a placebo/comparator arm were included. For calculations, SPSS Statistics software version 29 was used. The risk of bias for this study was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. Overall, 43 studies (13,264 participants in study arms and 11,676 in control arms) were included in the analysis. The mean difference of absolute change in Lp(a) concentration for all 43 studies equaled 0.22 mg/dL and was not clinically significant. Egger's regression-based test resulted in no risk of bias in this study (p = 0.404). In conclusion, statin therapy does not significantly affect Lp(a) levels. Results of this work suggest that people with high Lp(a) levels will not change their Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular (CV) risk by statin administration.

Lipoprotein(a) as a Risk Factor for Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction and Mortality: Insights from Routine Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-established risk factor for incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease. However, evidence regarding its association with recurrent events is limited. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of routine clinical data, focusing on patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between 2000 and 2022 with available admission Lp(a) results.

METHODS

Patients were stratified into three groups based on their Lp(a) level (≤50 mg/dL, 51-90 mg/dL, and >90 mg/dL). A multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the associations of Lp(a) with recurrent AMI, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2248 patients (31.5% women), with a mean age of 64.7 ± 12.2 years, were retrospectively followed until 31 December 2022, or death. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrent AMI were 1.01 (p = 0.921) for levels 51-90 mg/dL and 1.51 (p = 0.013) for levels > 90 mg/dL, compared with levels ≤ 50 mg/dL. The corresponding HRs for CV mortality were 1.13 (p = 0.300) and 1.14 (p = 0.348), and those for all-cause mortality were 1.09 (p = 0.310) and 1.20 (p = 0.090), respectively. Stratification by sex and age revealed a significant association of Lp(a) with recurrent AMI only in women aged > 65 years, with adjusted HRs of 2.34 (p = 0.013) for levels 51-90 mg/dL and 3.94 (p < 0.001) for levels > 90 mg/dL, compared with levels ≤ 50 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presented study, Lp(a) was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrent AMI only in women aged > 65 years with Lp(a) levels > 50 mg/dL. We found no significant associations between Lp(a) and CV or all-cause mortality.

Lipoprotein(a) and the atherosclerotic burden - Should we wait for clinical trial evidence before taking action?

The fact that lipoprotein(a) levels should be regarded as a causal residual risk factor in the atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) is now a no-brainer. This review article aims to summarize the latest evidence supporting the causal role of lipoprotein(a) in ASCVD and the potential strategies to reduce the lipoprotein(a) burden until clinical trial results are available. Epidemiological and genetic data demonstrate the causal link between lipoprotein(a) and increased ASCVD risk. That being said, a specific question comes to mind: "must we wait for outcome trials in order to take action?". Given that lipoprotein(a) levels predict incident ASCVD in both primary and secondary prevention contexts, with a linear risk gradient across its distribution, measuring lipoprotein(a) can unequivocally help identify patients who may later benefit from specific lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapies. This understanding has led various National Societies to recommend dosing lipoprotein(a) in high-risk individuals and to support the recommendation of measuring lipoprotein(a) levels at least once in every adult for risk stratification.

Association of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels with ischemic stroke in young patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established independent causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis. However, its association with young-onset ischemic stroke is not well-established. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association of elevated Lp(a) with young ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Four electronic databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library were systematically searched, profiling studies from inception till 6 Mar 2024. We included studies investigating the relationship between stratified Lp(a) levels and young ischemic stroke. We compared the odds of young stroke patients (age <65 years) having elevated Lp(a) compared to age-matched controls without stroke or transient ischemic attack.

RESULTS

Five case-control studies comprising a total of 1345 patients were included; 57.7 % (776/1345) were females, with a mean age of 41.5 years. Among them, 22.5 % (264/1171) were smokers. Additionally, 16.8 % (197/1171) had hypertension, 5.9 % (69/1171) had diabetes, and 29.2 % (284/971) had hyperlipidemia. Young stroke patients were more likely to have high Lp(a) level than age-matched controls (OR 1.61, 95 %CI 1.24-2.10). Four studies defined a high Lp(a) level as ≥30mg/dL, whilst one study used a Lp(a) level of >23.2mg/dL as the cut-off. A sensitivity analysis excluding this study showed that young stroke patients were still more likely to have Lp(a) ≥30mg/dL than controls (OR 1.43, 95 %CI 1.08-1.88).

CONCLUSION

Young stroke patients are more likely to have elevated Lp(a) compared to age-matched controls, suggesting an association between elevated Lp(a) and young stroke. Further research is warranted to evaluate the causal relationships between Lp(a) and young-onset ischemic stroke, as well as to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of Lp(a) screening in young adults as part of a primary prevention strategy.

When Does Primary Prevention Encroach on Secondary Prevention?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The risk of incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in primary prevention is typically lower than in secondary prevention. However, there is a spectrum of risk among individuals undergoing primary prevention with the risk in some individuals approaching those of secondary prevention. We review the clinical conditions wherein the risk in primary prevention is similar to that observed in secondary prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among individuals without established ASCVD, coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores ≥ 300 AU are associated with ASCVD event rates similar to secondary prevention populations. CAC score ≥ 1,000 AU are associated with an ASCVD risk seen in very high-risk secondary prevention populations. Interpretation of these observations must however consider differences in the risk reduction strategies. Current guidelines dichotomize ASCVD prevention into primary and secondary prevention, but certain primary prevention patients have an ASCVD risk equivalent to that of secondary prevention populations. Identifying higher risk primary prevention populations will allow for better risk mitigation strategies.

Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor among patients with and without diabetes Mellitus: the Mass General Brigham Lp(a) Registry

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and Lp(a) are well-established predictors of coronary artery disease (CAD) outcomes. However, their combined association remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between elevated Lp(a) and DM with CAD outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the MGB Lp(a) Registry involving patients ≥ 18 years who underwent Lp(a) measurements between 2000 and 2019. Exclusion criteria were severe kidney dysfunction, malignant neoplasms, and prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The primary outcome was a combination of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (MI). Elevated Lp(a) was defined as > 90th percentile (≥ 216 nmol/L).

RESULTS

Among 6,238 patients who met the eligibility criteria, the median age was 54, 45% were women, and 12% had DM. Patients with DM were older, more frequently male, and had a higher prevalence of additional cardiovascular risk factors. Over a median follow-up of 12.9 years, patients with either DM or elevated Lp(a) experienced higher rates of the primary outcome. Notably, those with elevated Lp(a) had a higher incidence of the primary outcome regardless of their DM status. The annual event rates were as follows: No-DM and Lp(a) < 90th% - 0.6%; No-DM and Lp(a) > 90th% - 1.3%; DM and Lp(a) < 90th% - 1.9%; DM and Lp(a) > 90th% - 4.7% (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, elevated Lp(a) remained independently associated with the primary outcome among both patients with DM (HR = 2.66 [95%CI: 1.55-4.58], p < 0.001) and those without DM (HR = 2.01 [95%CI: 1.48-2.74], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated Lp(a) constitutes an independent and incremental risk factor for CAD outcomes in patients with and without DM.

Ancestry specific distribution of LPA Kringle IV-Type-2 genetic variants highlight associations to apo(a) copy number, glucose, and hypertension

Background

High Lp(a) levels contribute to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and are tightly regulated by the LPA gene . Lp(a) levels have an inverse correlation with LPA Kringle IV Type-2 (KIV-2) copy number (CN). Black (B) and Hispanic (H) individuals exhibit higher levels of Lp(a), and rates of CVD compared to non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Therefore, we investigated genetic variations in the LPA KIV-2 region across three ancestries and their associations with metabolic risk factors.

Methods

Using published pipelines, we analyzed a multi-ethnic whole exome dataset comprising 3,817 participants from the Washington Heights and Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP): 886 [NHW (23%), 1,811 Caribbean (C) H (47%), and 1,120 B individuals (29%). Rare and common variants (alternative allele carrier frequency, CF < 0.01 or > 0.99 and 0.01 < CF < 0.99, respectively) were identified and KIV-2 CN estimated. The associations of variants and CN with history of heart disease, hypertension (HTN), stroke, lipid levels and clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) was assessed. A small pilot provided in-silico validation of study findings.

Results

We report 1421 variants in the LPA KIV-2 repeat region, comprising 267 exonic and 1154 intronic variants. 61.4% of the exonic variants have not been previously described. Three novel exonic variants significantly increase the risk of HTN across all ethnic groups: 4785-C/A (frequency = 78%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.45, p = 0.032), 727-T/C (frequency = 96%, OR = 2.11, p = 0.032), and 723-A/G (frequency = 96%, OR = 1.97, p = 0.038). Additionally, six intronic variants showed associations with HTN: 166-G/A, 387-G/C, 402-G/A, 4527-A/T, 4541-G/A, and 4653-A/T. One intronic variant, 412-C/T, was associated with decreased blood glucose levels (frequency = 72%, β = -14.52, p = 0.02).Three of the associations were not affected after adjusting for LPA KIV-2 CN: 412-C/T (β = -14.2, p = 0.03), 166-G/A (OR = 1.41, p = 0.05), and 387-G/C (OR = 1.40, p = 0.05). KIV CN itself was significantly associated with 314 variants and was negatively correlated with plasma total cholesterol levels.

Conclusions

In three ancestry groups, we identify novel rare and common LPA KIV-2 region variants. We report new associations of variants with HTN and Glucose levels. These results underscore the genetic complexity of the LPA KIV-2 region in influencing cardiovascular and metabolic health, suggesting potential genetic regulation of pathways that can be studied for research and therapeutic interventions.

All we need to know about lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a genetically determined macromolecular complex, is independently and causally associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic stenosis via proposed proinflammatory, prothrombotic, and proatherogenic mechanisms. While Lp(a) measurement standardization issues are being resolved, several guidelines now support testing Lp(a) at least once in each adult's lifetime for ASCVD risk prediction which can foster implementation of more aggressive primary or secondary prevention therapies. Currently, there are several emerging targeted Lp(a) lowering therapies in active clinical investigation for safety and cardiovascular benefit among both primary and secondary prevention populations. First degree relatives of patients with high Lp(a) should be encouraged to undergo cascade screening. Primary prevention patients with high Lp(a) should consider obtaining a coronary calcium score for further risk estimation and to guide further ASCVD risk factor management including consideration of low dose aspirin therapy. Secondary prevention patients with high Lp(a) levels should consider adding PCSK9 inhibition to statin therapy.