Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Trends in Clinical Features, Treatment, and Outcomes From 2001 to 2020

Autoantibody development is associated with clinical severity of COVID-19: A cohort study

Viral infections, including respiratory diseases such as Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are hypothesized to contribute to the onset of autoimmune disorders. Although elevated levels of autoantibodies have been observed following COVID-19, the role of specific autoantibodies linked to autoimmune diseases and their correlation with disease severity remains poorly defined. In this study, we used a comprehensive autoantibody panel to assess the autoantibody production across different cohorts of COVID-19 patients, categorized by disease severity. We also compared patients with severe COVID-19 to a control group with other severe, non-COVID-related diseases. Our findings indicate that the severity of COVID-19 corresponds to the overall production of specific autoantibodies, which are particularly associated with COVID-19. This association might predispose to an increased risk for the development of autoimmune conditions after a severe course of COVID-19.

Derivation and validation of the Caravaggio score for the risk stratification for recurrence in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

In patients with cancer associated venous thromboembolism (CAT), risk factor-based scores for recurrence could drive clinical management. The aim of this study in patients with CAT was to develop and validate a risk score for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during anticoagulation: the Caravaggio score.

METHODS

The Caravaggio score was developed in patients included in the Caravaggio trial and then externally validated in patients included in the TESEO registry. Potential predictors (univariate p-value ≤ 0.1) for recurrence were evaluated in a multivariable Cox regression model with death unrelated to VTE as competing event. Candidate predictors were identified and scored based on clinical relevance and β-coefficient. Patients were then categorized in three risk classes. The performance of the Caravaggio score was assessed by discrimination (c-statistics), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

Symptomatic VTE, ovarian and/or uterine cancer, pancreatic cancer, metastatic cancer, adenocarcinoma histological subtype, and pharmacological anticancer treatment were included in the score. In the derivation cohort, the incidence of recurrent VTE in the high, intermediate and low-risk groups was 11.6, 7.7 and 2.5 %, respectively. Incidences in the validation cohort were 8.0, 3.5 and 1.7 %, respectively. c-statistics in derivation and validation cohorts were 0.641 (95 % CI 0.584-0.698) and 0.606, (95 % CI 0.557-0.653), respectively. The NPV for low vs. intermediate/high-risk group was 98 % (95 % CI 95-99) in the derivation and 98 % (95 % CI 97-99) in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The Caravaggio score is simple and able to stratify patients with CAT for the risk for VTE recurrence.

Anticoagulation for patients discharged from the emergency department with venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being used over low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The objective of this study was to examine predictors of anticoagulant type (DOAC vs. LMWH) prescribed at discharge from the emergency department (ED) among patients diagnosed with VTE in the ED.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult (>17 years) patients discharged from an Ontario, Canada ED in a tertiary care centre with an ED diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism from January 2019 to December 2021. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the predictors of the anticoagulant (DOAC vs. LMWH) prescribed at discharge. Covariables included: age, sex, history of major bleeding, history of cancer, and previous anticoagulation.

RESULTS

VTE was confirmed in 390 ED visits by 365 unique patients. Among unique patients, 239 (65.5 %) patients were discharged from the ED and included in analysis. Of the 239 patients included, 12.1 % of patients were over the age of 80, 46.4 % were female and 29.7 % had a history of cancer. The majority of patients discharged from the ED were prescribed DOACs (70.7 %,169/239). Cancer history was associated with anticoagulation with LMWH (vs. DOAC) on discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] =12.81, 95 % CI: 6.60-25.90).

CONCLUSIONS

While most patients diagnosed with VTE in the ED setting were discharged with DOACs, most cancer patients included in our study were treated with LMWH over DOACs, despite increasing evidence around the efficacy and safety of DOACs in most cancer patients. Further research is needed to understand longitudinal trends in anticoagulation.

Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cancer

The hemostatic system and cancer display a tight interconnection, and hemostatic imbalance frequently occurs in patients with cancer. While extensive knowledge about thrombotic risk has been generated, less is known about bleeding risk and associated risk factors. However, bleeding risk is of high significance as patients with cancer frequently receive therapeutic anticoagulation for various indications and/or are candidates for primary thromboprophylaxis. The risk of bleeding in patients with cancer is variable and difficult to assess in clinical practice. Certain clinical settings such as hospitalization, specific underlying risk factors (e.g., tumor type), and medications (e.g., anticoagulation) can contribute to the individual bleeding risk of a patient with cancer. In addition, some dynamic factors such as platelet count or kidney function have an impact. Particularly, data on baseline risk of bleeding are lacking to allow for risk assessment in cancer patients without anticoagulation. In contrast, risk assessment models for the prediction of bleeding events in cancer patients receiving anticoagulation have been developed; however, these have yet to be validated. The recognition of the importance of bleeding risk in cancer patients is growing, leading to an increasing number of studies investigating and reporting bleeding complications. As study designs and reporting of bleeding events vary, it is challenging to offer a clear synthesis of evidence. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of currently available data about incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of bleeding events in patients with cancer, and critically review risk assessment models for bleeding in cancer patients during anticoagulant therapy.

Prevention of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)-Associated Vein Thrombosis in Cancer: A Narrative Review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered the most common and potentially life-threatening cardiovascular complication in cancer and the second leading cause of death after cancer progression itself. In recent years, the steadily increasing rate of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) seems mainly related to amelioration in imaging techniques and the placements of central venous catheters (CVCs). The pivotal role of CVCs in the switch from hospital to home care is offset by its high thrombotic burden. The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) offers advantages (convenience, fast access, and cost-effectiveness) in comparison to centrally inserted devices (PORT), but increased thrombotic risk is reported. The aim of this narrative review was to offer a comprehensive overview of the existing literature about PICC-related thrombosis (PICC-VTE) by analyzing the current knowledge and related gaps. We further discussed advancements in insertion techniques, underscored the role of the novel PICC-PORT lines, and provided a "head-to-head" comparison among major guidelines on primary thromboprophylaxis.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: what is new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The life expectancy of patients suffering from thrombosis associated with cancer has improved significantly, making them a chronic disease. Patients with thrombosis and cancer are fragile. Treated with anticoagulants, they remain at risk of complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consequently, news issues emerge for clinical practice: anticoagulation therapy personalization is required to optimize the benefit ratio, involving patient characteristics and cancer characteristics. During follow-up, prediction score are designed and investigated to help identify and discriminate patients at risk of venous thromboembolism recurrences and major bleedings. Considering the improved prognosis of patients with cancer and cancer-associated thrombosis, the question of extended treatment arises, representing a major unmet need to date. Finally, new strategies, in particular anti-XI agents that appear attractive options, are currently being evaluated in the treatment of thrombosis associated with cancer.

SUMMARY

The improved prognosis of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis is accompanied by new therapeutic strategies to improve the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulant treatment in these fragile patients, at risk of both venous thromboembolic recurrence and haemorrhagic complication.

Baseline characteristics, management patterns and outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism and malignancy: Insights from a single-centre study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the main causes of death in patients with active cancer. In this study, we evaluated the impact of malignancy on the treatment choices, and short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute PE.

METHODS

In this study, 872 acute PE patients (age 61.6 ± 16.8 years, female 57.5 %) from different risk and treatment categories were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups according to the presence of active malignancy.

RESULTS

Active malignancy was documented in 129 (14.8 %) out of the 872 patients. Ultrasound-assisted-thrombolysis (USAT), rheolytic-thrombectomy (RT), systemic-thrombolysis (ST) and anticoagulation-alone therapies were noted in 27.3 %, 6.4 %, 16.6 % and 49.7 % of overall PE patients. RT and anticoagulation therapies were more frequent in patients with malignancy whereas ST and USAT were more frequently used in the other group. Regardless of the presence of malignancy and the treatment modality chosen, significant improvements were achieved in all treatment targets (p < 0.001 for all). Bleeding rates were similar in both groups, while in-hospital and long-term mortality was higher in the malignancy cohort. Active malignancy was found to be an independent predictor for composite of 60-day mortality and PE-related rehospitalization (adjusted OR: 2.43; 95 % CI: 1.32-4.47, p = 0.04) and long-term mortality (adjusted HR: 2.25, 95 % CI: 1.29-3.91, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant malignancy adversely affects both short- and long-term outcomes in patients with acute PE. Although these patients are more vulnerable, it is possible to achieve satisfactory treatment success with acceptable bleeding rates with the inclusion of catheter-based methods as treatment option.

Thrombosis, Translational Medicine, and Biomarker Research: Moving the Needle

Arterial and venous thromboembolism are leading causes of morbidity and death worldwide. Despite significant advances in the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of thrombotic diseases over the past 3 decades, the adoption of findings stemming from translational biomarker research in clinical practice remains limited. Biomarkers provide an opportunity to enhance our understanding of pathophysiological processes and optimize treatment strategies. They hold the promise of revolutionizing patient care. Still, this potential remains untapped, and several factors impede their use for near-patient applications. We sought to provide an overview of biomarker research in arterial and venous thromboembolic disease. We then aimed to discuss key barriers to the broader clinical implementation of biomarker research and highlight promising strategies to overcome them. We emphasize the merits of translational and implementation science to bridge the gaps from bench to bedside. Innovative trial design, data sharing, and collaborative efforts between academia and industry will be essential. Purposeful regression methodology using rational conceptual framework design, causal mediation analysis, and artificial intelligence might better leverage the use of observational data. Dedicated translational science training programs geared toward educating physicians on the appropriate measurement, interpretation, and integration of biomarker data in clinical practice should foster endorsement by frontline physicians. Finally, we make the case in support of a paradigm shift in cardiovascular medicine. Improved recognition of biomarker research and a greater emphasis on mechanistic evidence can better equip clinicians to deal with the uncertainty that defines the practice of thrombosis medicine.

A mouse model of deep vein thrombosis by inferior vena cava hypoperfusion using ameroid constrictors

Traditional mouse models for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), frequently utilized in research focused on cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), reliably induce thrombus formation by obstructing blood flow (BF) in the inferior vena cava (IVC), which does not occur in humans. Therefore, to develop a new DVT model for CAT studies, we implanted an ameroid constrictor (AC), a hygroscopic casein C-shape device, around the IVC and aorta of immunocompromised mice. We evaluated the thrombus 3 and 8 days post-AC implantation and compared it with the traditional model 2 days post-vena cava ligation. The size of each thrombus was measured, and the composition was assessed using histological staining; BF through the IVC was confirmed using ultrasound imaging. The thrombus size variability in the AC and ligation models was equivalent. Compared with thrombi on day 3 post-AC implantation, those on day 8 showed characteristics of human thrombi in the subacute to chronic stage. The BF in the IVC was maintained even on day 8. In summary, the AC model showed reproducibility with no significant difference in thrombus size variability from the traditional ligation model while maintaining the BF of the IVC.

Occurrence and management of thrombosis recurrence and bleeding in low-molecular-weight heparin-treated patients with cancer-associated thrombosis: a French nationwide cohort study

Background

Rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding remain high in patients with cancer who are prescribed anticoagulants (ACs) such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) after an initial VTE event.

Objectives

To identify patient characteristics associated with VTE recurrence and bleeding in patients receiving LMWH for cancer-associated VTE and to explore secondary AC management and clinical outcomes in these patients.

Methods

An observational study was conducted using nationwide French data for adults with active cancer who were hospitalized with VTE in 2013-2018 and were reimbursed for LMWH ≤ 30 days after hospital discharge. The main outcomes were VTE recurrence and bleeding. For both outcomes, the proportions of patients who experienced the outcome were calculated for different patient characteristics. AC switching following VTE recurrence and bleeding was tracked using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes.

Results

A total of 31,771 patients received LMWH, of whom 1925 (6.1%) experienced VTE recurrence and 1804 (5.7%) bleeding. Most recurrent VTE and bleeding events occurred within 6 months after the initial VTE event. The proportion of patients with VTE recurrence and bleeding varied between cancer types. Most patients who experienced VTE recurrence or bleeding continued to receive LMWH. Eleven percent of patients with VTE recurrence experienced a further recurrent VTE event within 3 months.

Conclusion

More than 10% of patients who received LMWH for cancer-associated VTE experienced VTE recurrence or bleeding. AC management options in this patient population should be prospectively assessed in clinical trials.

Retinal vascular events and relationship to CANCER development

BACKGROUND

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a frequent and clinically relevant vascular pathology. The main risk factors are the same as systemic cardiovascular risk factors, but recently other significant risk factors have been studied. The aim of this study is to analyse the risk factors for retinal venous thrombosis and their relationship with the development of cancer.

METHODS

710 patients with retinal vascular pathology were included, of whom 527 had suffered retinal venous thrombosis. Patients were followed up in internal medicine outpatient clinics between September 24, 1999, and April 30, 2022. The incidence of cancer during that time was collected.

RESULTS

Of 527 patients evaluated, 448 (86.7 %) presented cardiovascular risk factors, and 89 (17.2 %) developed some neoplasm, being the most frequent: prostate (19.1 %), colon (16.9 %), skin (12.4 %), breast (9.0 %). Retinal venous thrombosis was related to the development of neoplasms during follow-up time (Log Rank = 5.28, p = 0.022; Breslow = 4.84, p = 0.028). Other significant factors were age above the median, smoking, HbA1c levels, and homocysteine levels higher than the median, and cholesterol and LDL-Cholesterol lower than the median. Age above the median (p < 0.001), smoking (p = 0.003) and levels of cholesterol below the median (p = 0.026) were independently related to the development of neoplasms.

CONCLUSIONS

Retinal venous thrombosis is associated with the development of cancer. Other factors related to its development have been identified. If this is confirmed, the implications for the diagnosis, control, and treatment of these patients should be evaluated.

Preventative and curative treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in cancer patients

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is common in patients with cancer and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of CAT continues to rise, complicating patient care and burdening healthcare systems. Patients with cancer experiencing VTE face poorer prognoses, making prevention and effective management imperative. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy and acute treatment strategies for CAT. Risk assessment models (e.g., Khorana score) aid in identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been shown to reduce the risk of CAT without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding complications. However, implementation of risk-based strategies remains limited in clinical practice. For acute CAT management, LMWHs have been the standard of care, but DOACs are increasingly favored due to their convenience and efficacy. However, challenges persist, including bleeding risks and drug interactions. Emerging therapies targeting Factor XI inhibitors present promising alternatives, potentially addressing current limitations in anticoagulation management for CAT.

Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in France

BACKGROUND

Few epidemiological data are available for venous thromboembolism (VTE) at French national and subnational levels.

AIMS

To quantify VTE events in France in 2022 and describe the features of hospital management and outcomes.

METHODS

Adults hospitalized for a VTE as the primary reason for hospitalization or treatment in a medical unit in 2022 were identified from medical administrative data. Data were stratified as pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and by French department and various sociodemographic indicators. VTE prevalence at 1 January 2023 was defined as the number of people alive at that date with a history of hospitalization for VTE or a chronic long-term disease status due to VTE (2012-2022).

RESULTS

VTE cases reached 896,846 adults on 1 January 2023. VTE was the primary diagnosis for a hospital stay or medical unit in 62,055 patients hospitalized in 2022. The age-standardized rate of hospitalized patients was 23.0% higher for men versus women. There were considerable variations between departments of residence, while Martinique had the highest age-standardized rate. The prevalence of triggering factors was high, with almost 30% having cancer and 20% a recent long hospitalization. One-year mortality was approximately 20% for both PE and DVT, despite rehospitalization rates <5%.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of cancer among patients hospitalized due to VTE partly explains the high 1-year mortality. As VTE is partially avoidable, the prevention of VTE needs to be improved in France and whether thromboprophylaxis guidance is being followed should regularly be assessed.

Management challenges of recurrent venous thromboembolism in advanced digestive cancers: Case studies and therapeutic strategies

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant challenge in cancer patients, particularly those with advanced malignancies. The management of recurrent VTE is complicated by the need for effective anticoagulation while addressing the underlying cancer progression.

CASES

We present two clinical cases from the gastroenterology department at Percy French military hospital involving patients with progressive malignant digestive diseases. Patient 1, a 62-year-old woman, developed recurrent pulmonary embolism despite appropriate anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). After treatment adjustments, she ultimately succumbed to tumor progression. Patient 2, a 54-year-old man hospitalized for pulmonary embolism, faced upper gastrointestinal bleeding and delayed anticoagulation initiation. Although he showed initial improvement with immunotherapy and stabilization of thrombotic events, he experienced oncological progression and recurrent VTE, leading to palliative care.

DISCUSSION

These cases illustrate the difficulties of managing recurrent VTE, even with curative anticoagulation and dose escalation. In case of VTE recurrence, it is essential to investigate for cancer progression and ensure patient adherence to treatment. A comprehensive management strategy should involve both the malignancy and the thrombotic complications.

CONCLUSION

The management of recurrent VTE in cancer patients requires a multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulation adjustments. These clinical cases highlight the necessity for integrated care that addresses both oncological and thrombotic concerns, emphasizing the importance of timely intervention and collaboration among healthcare providers.

Direct oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become widely used for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, DOAC-associated bleeding complications remain challenging, especially in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. This study aimed to compare the bleeding outcomes between patients with upper or lower GI cancers and those without GI cancer.

METHODS

Using the COMMAND VTE Registry-2 database, which is a multicenter registry enrolling 5197 consecutive acute symptomatic VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020, we identified 1149 active cancer patients with DOACs (upper GI cancer: N = 88; lower GI cancer: N = 114; non-GI cancer: N = 947). The primary outcome was major bleeding during anticoagulation therapy, which was evaluated in the competing risk regression model.

RESULTS

The upper GI cancer group had a lower mean body weight, and most often had anemia. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was higher in the upper GI cancer group (upper GI cancer: 22.4 %, lower GI cancer: 15.4 %, and non-GI cancer: 11.6 %, P = 0.015). The most frequent major bleeding site in the upper GI cancer group was the upper GI (53 %), followed by the lower GI (24 %). After adjusting for the confounders, the excess risk in upper GI cancer relative to non-GI cancer remained significant for major bleeding (adjusted subhazard ratio, 2.25; 95 %CI, 1.31-3.87, P = 0.003), but that in lower GI cancer was insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper GI cancer, but not lower GI cancer, as compared to non-GI cancer was associated with a higher risk for major bleeding during anticoagulation therapy with DOACs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm Unique identifier: UMIN000044816.

Edoxaban for 12 vs. 3 months in cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis according to different doses: insights from the ONCO DVT study

BACKGROUND

The ONCO DVT study revealed the superiority of 12-month relative to 3-month edoxaban treatment for cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) regarding the thrombotic risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study, we stratified the patients into those with a standard edoxaban dose (60 mg/day; N = 151) and those with a reduced edoxaban dose (30 mg/day; N = 450) and evaluated the clinical outcomes for the 12- and 3-month treatments. The cumulative 12-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 12-month than 3-month group for both the 60 mg (1.3% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.02; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.97) and 30 mg (1.1% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.002; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60) edoxaban subgroups, which was consistent across the edoxaban doses without a significant interaction (P = 0.90). The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was higher in the 12-month group than in the 3-month group for the 60 mg edoxaban subgroup (14.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.046; OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 0.97-13.52), whereas it did not significantly differ between the two groups for the 30 mg edoxaban subgroup (8.7% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.89; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49-1.91), signalling there was a potential interaction (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

A 12-month edoxaban regimen for cancer-associated isolated distal DVT was consistently superior to a 3-month regimen, across the edoxaban doses for the thrombotic risk. However, caution was suggested for the standard dose of edoxaban due to the potential for an increased risk of bleeding with prolonged anticoagulation therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03895502 (ONCO DVT Trial): https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03895502.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer-associated venous thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated clinical benefits and better patient adherence over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in treating patients with cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT). We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of DOACs against LMWH in patients with CAT from the perspective of the Hong Kong healthcare system.

Methods

A Markov state-transition model was performed to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for DOACs and LMWH in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients with CAT over a 5-year lifetime horizon. The model was primarily based on the health states of no event, recurrent venous thromboembolism, bleeding, and death. Transition probabilities, relative risks, and utilities were derived from the literature. Resource cost data were obtained from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results.

Results

Relative to LMWH, DOACs were associated with increased QALYs (1.52 versus 1.50) at a lower medical cost of USD 2,232 versus 8,224 in five years. The cost of LMWH was the main contributor to the outcome. Out of 10,000 simulated cases, DOACs were dominant in 15.8% and cost-effective in 42.1%, at the willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 148,392 per additional QALY.

Conclusions

DOACs were associated with greater QALY improvements and lower overall costs compared to LMWH. Accounting for uncertainty, DOACs were between cost-effective and dominant in 57.9% of cases. DOACs are a cost-effective alternative to LMWH in the management of CAT in Hong Kong.

The Conundrum of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Lesson Learned from Two Intriguing Cases and Literature Review

The correlation between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is solid, whereas the knowledge about cancer-related arterial thromboembolism (ATE) still needs a deeper investigation to clarify its pathogenesis. We describe two cases that represent useful hints for a comprehensive review of the thrombotic issue. A 75-year-old man with advanced rectal cancer treated with fluoropyrimidines suffered two catheter-related VTE events managed according to current guidelines. There was no indication for "extended" anticoagulant therapy for him, but during antithrombotic wash-out and fluoropyrimidines plus panitumumab regimen, he suffered a massive right coronary artery (RCA) thrombosis. Another patient with no cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and affected by advanced bladder cancer was treated with a platinum-containing regimen and suffered an acute inferior myocardial infarction 2 days after chemotherapy administration. He was successfully treated with primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty of RCA, discontinuing platinum-based therapy. Our observations raise the issue of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) complexity and the potential correlation between arterial and venous thrombotic events. Moreover, physicians should be aware of the thrombotic risk associated with anticancer therapies, suggesting that an appropriate prophylaxis should be considered.