Long-lasting effects of sublingual immunotherapy according to its duration: a 15-year prospective study

IL-10-modulated dendritic cells from birch pollen- and hazelnut-allergic patients facilitate Treg-mediated allergen-specific and cross-reactive tolerance

BACKGROUND

Approximately 70% of individuals allergic to birch pollen (Bet v 1.01 [Bet]) develop a secondary food allergy (e.g., hazelnut: Cor a 1.04 [Cor]), due to allergen cross-reactivity. However, standard immunotherapy for type I allergies often does not improve the food allergy sufficiently. We analyzed the allergen-specific and cross-reactive suppressive capacity of primary human regulatory T cells (Treg) induced by autologous IL-10-modulated dendritic cells (IL-10 DC) in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

CD4+ T cells of patients with birch pollen and associated hazelnut allergies were differentiated into Bet-specific or non-specific induced Treg (iTreg). After Bet- or Cor-specific restimulation the phenotype, proliferation, and suppressive capacity of iTreg subsets were analyzed. iTreg function was further investigated in humanized mouse models of airway and intestinal allergy, generated by engraftment of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from allergic donors into immunodeficient animals.

RESULTS

After IL-10 DC priming and allergen-specific restimulation (Bet or Cor), non-specific control iTreg remained anergic, whereas Bet-specific iTreg proliferated extensively and exhibited a regulatory phenotype (enhanced expression of CTLA-4, PD-1, TNFR2, IL-10). Accordingly, activated Bet-specific iTreg displayed a high capacity to suppress Bet- and Cor-induced responder Th2 cell responses in vitro, indicating induction of both allergen-specific (birch) and cross-reactive tolerance (hazelnut). In vivo, the beneficial effect of Bet-specific iTreg was verified in humanized mouse models of allergic airway and intestinal inflammation, resulting in reduced allergen-induced clinical symptoms, and immune responses.

CONCLUSION

Human IL-10 DC-induced iTreg facilitate allergen-specific and cross-reactive tolerance. Therefore, they are potential candidates for regulatory cell therapy in allergic and autoimmune diseases.

Intranasal administration of a synthetic TLR4 agonist INI-2004 significantly reduces allergy symptoms following therapeutic administration in a murine model of allergic sensitization

Introduction

Atopic diseases have been steadily increasing over the past decades and effective disease-modifying treatment options are urgently needed. These studies introduce a novel synthetic Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist, INI-2004, with remarkable efficacy as a therapeutic intranasal treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Methods

Using a murine airway allergic sensitization model, the impact of INI-2004 on allergic responses was assessed.

Results

One or two intranasal doses of INI-2004 significantly reduced airway resistance, eosinophil influx, and Th2 cytokine production - providing strong evidence of allergic desensitization. Further investigations revealed that a liposomal formulation of INI-2004 exhibited better safety and efficacy profiles compared to aqueous formulations. Importantly, the liposomal formulation demonstrated a 1000-fold increase in the maximum tolerated intravenous dose in pigs. Pre-clinical GLP toxicology studies in rats and pigs confirmed the safety of liposomal INI-2004, supporting its selection for human clinical trials.

Discussion

These findings lay the groundwork for the ongoing clinical evaluation of INI-2004 in allergic rhinitis as a stand-alone therapy for individuals poly-sensitized to multiple seasonal allergens. The study underscores the significance of innovative immunotherapy approaches in reshaping the landscape of allergic rhinitis management.

Allergen immunotherapy in asthma

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), including SCIT and SLIT, is a treatment that involves the administration of allergens to which patients with allergic diseases have been sensitized. HDM-SCIT for asthma is indicated in cases of HDM-sensitized allergic asthma with normal lung function. HDM-SCIT improves asthma symptoms and AHR, and decreases the medication dose. Importantly, AIT can improve other allergic diseases complicated by asthma, such as allergic rhinitis, which can also contribute to the improvement of asthma symptoms. Several studies have suggested that HDM-SLIT also attenuates the risk of asthma exacerbations, and improves lung function in asthma cases with allergic rhinitis. Furthermore, AIT can modify the natural course of allergic diseases, including asthma. For example, the effects of AIT are maintained for at least several years after treatment discontinuation. AIT can prevent the onset of asthma when introduced in allergic rhinitis, and can also inhibit or reduce new allergen sensitizations. Recent data have suggested that AIT may suppress non-targeted allergen-induced immune responses in addition to targeted allergen-induced responses, and suppress infections of the lower respiratory tract by enhancing IFN responses.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Immunotherapy for Inhalant Allergy

OBJECTIVE

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the therapeutic exposure to an allergen or allergens selected by clinical assessment and allergy testing to decrease allergic symptoms and induce immunologic tolerance. Inhalant AIT is administered to millions of patients for allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic asthma (AA) and is most commonly delivered as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Despite its widespread use, there is variability in the initiation and delivery of safe and effective immunotherapy, and there are opportunities for evidence-based recommendations for improved patient care.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to identify quality improvement opportunities and provide clinicians trustworthy, evidence-based recommendations regarding the management of inhaled allergies with immunotherapy. Specific goals of the guideline are to optimize patient care, promote safe and effective therapy, reduce unjustified variations in care, and reduce the risk of harm. The target patients for the guideline are any individuals aged 5 years and older with AR, with or without AA, who are either candidates for immunotherapy or treated with immunotherapy for their inhalant allergies. The target audience is all clinicians involved in the administration of immunotherapy. This guideline is intended to focus on evidence-based quality improvement opportunities judged most important by the guideline development group (GDG). It is not intended to be a comprehensive, general guide regarding the management of inhaled allergies with immunotherapy. The statements in this guideline are not intended to limit or restrict care provided by clinicians based on their experience and assessment of individual patients.

ACTION STATEMENTS

The GDG made a strong recommendation that (Key Action Statement [KAS] 10) the clinician performing allergy skin testing or administering AIT must be able to diagnose and manage anaphylaxis. The GDG made recommendations for the following KASs: (KAS 1) Clinicians should offer or refer to a clinician who can offer immunotherapy for patients with AR with or without AA if their patients' symptoms are inadequately controlled with medical therapy, allergen avoidance, or both, or have a preference for immunomodulation. (KAS 2A) Clinicians should not initiate AIT for patients who are pregnant, have uncontrolled asthma, or are unable to tolerate injectable epinephrine. (KAS 3) Clinicians should evaluate the patient or refer the patient to a clinician who can evaluate for signs and symptoms of asthma before initiating AIT and for signs and symptoms of uncontrolled asthma before administering subsequent AIT. (KAS 4) Clinicians should educate patients who are immunotherapy candidates regarding the differences between SCIT and SLIT (aqueous and tablet) including risks, benefits, convenience, and costs. (KAS 5) Clinicians should educate patients about the potential benefits of AIT in (1) preventing new allergen sensitizations, (2) reducing the risk of developing AA, and (3) altering the natural history of the disease with continued benefit after discontinuation of therapy. (KAS 6) Clinicians who administer SLIT to patients with seasonal AR should offer pre- and co-seasonal immunotherapy. (KAS 7) Clinicians prescribing AIT should limit treatment to only those clinically relevant allergens that correlate with the patient's history and are confirmed by testing. (KAS 9) Clinicians administering AIT should continue escalation or maintenance dosing when patients have local reactions (LRs) to AIT. (KAS 11) Clinicians should avoid repeat allergy testing as an assessment of the efficacy of ongoing AIT unless there is a change in environmental exposures or a loss of control of symptoms. (KAS 12) For patients who are experiencing symptomatic control from AIT, clinicians should treat for a minimum duration of 3 years, with ongoing treatment duration based on patient response to treatment. The GDG offered the following KASs as options: (KAS 2B) Clinicians may choose not to initiate AIT for patients who use concomitant beta-blockers, have a history of anaphylaxis, have systemic immunosuppression, or have eosinophilic esophagitis (SLIT only). (KAS 8) Clinicians may treat polysensitized patients with a limited number of allergens.

Short-term and long-term efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in different courses for house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis

PURPOSE

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been proven to be an effective and safe treatment for patients with house dust mite (HDM)-induced allergic rhinitis (AR) to achieve short-term and long-term efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between SLIT duration and long-term efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved 134 patients who underwent SLIT between 2019 and 2021 (in the 2-year group), between 2018 and 2021(in the 3-year group), or between 2017 and 2021 (in the 4-year group). The total nasal symptoms score (TNSS), total medication score (TMS), visual analogue scale (VAS), the Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at baseline, after treatment (2021) and one year after the treatment completion (2022). The correlation between MiniRQLQ and other indicators was also analyzed.

RESULTS

After SLIT, patients in all three groups showed significant improvements in TNSS, TMS, VAS and MiniRQLQ scores (all p < 0.001). These improvements were sustained even one year after SLIT. Patients who received 3-4 years of SLIT showed significant improvement compared with those who received 2 years of SLIT in all clinical outcomes (all p < 0.01). The analysis showed positive correlations between the MiniRQLQ and TNSS, TMS, and VAS (all p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the AE rate in all three groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Different duration of HDM SLIT could generate various short-term and long-term clinical efficacy. The MiniRQLQ could be applied to evaluate SLIT efficacy in clinical practice.

Advancements in Allergen Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects individuals of all age groups, manifesting as a spectrum of symptoms varying from mild to severe. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) involves the administration of allergen extracts and has emerged as a potential treatment strategy for modifying immune responses. Its pathogenesis involves epidermal barrier dysfunction, microbiome imbalance, immune dysregulation, and environmental factors. Existing treatment strategies encompass topical steroids to systemic agents, while AIT is under investigation as a potential immune-modifying alternative. Several studies have shown reductions in the severity scoring of atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) scores, daily rescue medication use, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores following AIT. Biomarker changes include increased IgG4 levels and decreased eosinophil counts. This review provides valuable insights for future research and clinical practice, exploring AIT as a viable option for the management of AD.

The KAAACI Guidelines for Sublingual Immunotherapy

Allergen immunotherapy is regarded as the only disease-modifying treatment option for various allergic conditions, including allergic rhinitis and asthma. Among the routes of administration of allergens, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has gained clinical interest recently, and the prescription of SLIT is increasing among patients with allergies. After 30 years of SLIT use, numerous pieces of evidence supporting its efficacy, safety, and mechanism allows SLIT to be considered as an alternative option to subcutaneous immunotherapy. Based on the progressive development of SLIT, the current guideline from the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy, and Clinical Immunology aims to provide an expert opinion by allergy, pediatrics, and otorhinolaryngology specialists with an extensive literature review. This guideline addresses the use of SLIT, including 1) mechanisms of action, 2) appropriate patient selection for SLIT, 3) the currently available SLIT products in Korea, and 4) updated information on its efficacy and safety. This guideline will facilitate a better understanding of practical considerations for SLIT.

The Art of Immunotherapy

Selection of a patient with rhinitis/conjunctivitis or asthma for allergy immunotherapy (AIT) requires several decisions. First, does the patient's sensitization, pattern of exposure to an allergen, and degree of exposure to that allergen reasonably suggest a causal relationship? Does the level and duration of symptoms warrant the cost and inconvenience of immunotherapy, or is the patient motivated by the disease-modifying potential of AIT? If AIT is selected, is the choice to be greater safety and convenience with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets, but with treatment probably limited to 2 or 3 allergens, or for subcutaneous immunotherapy where multiple allergen therapy is the rule and efficacy may be somewhat greater, at least initially, or does the physician go off-label into the unknowns of liquid SLIT? Are there extracts of sufficient potency to achieve likely effective doses? How does the physician deal with large local or systemic reactions, with gaps in treatment, with pollen seasons, and the use of premedication or cautionary prescription of epinephrine autoinjectors? How can adherence to AIT be improved? These and other questions are addressed in this paper.

Comparison of rush-subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite extract for pediatric allergic rhinitis: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with standardized house dust mite (HDM) extract for allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Participants with allergic rhinitis selected their treatment between HDM SCIT or HDM SLIT, according to their wishes. We prospectively followed symptoms of allergic rhinitis using the allergic rhinitis symptom medication score (ARSMS), along with adverse reactions, during the dose escalation and maintenance phases for two years. We compared the outcomes between propensity score-matched groups to adjust the confounding factors.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 88 patients in the HDM SCIT (n = 44) and HDM SLIT groups (n = 44) remained for analysis. The HDM SCIT group showed significantly earlier effectiveness than the HDM SLIT group (median time to decrease in ARSMS [≥2 points]: 5.5 vs. 18.0 months, p < 0.001). The incidence of systemic reactions was not significantly different between the two groups in the dose escalation phase (68.2% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.379). In the maintenance phase, the incidence of systemic reactions was higher in the HDM SCIT group than in the HDM SLIT group (18.2% vs. 0%, p < 0.006). All 44 patients in the HDM SCIT group completed two years of treatment, while nine patients in the HDM SLIT group discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The HDM SCIT group showed an earlier onset of therapeutic effect and a lower discontinuation rate than the HDM SLIT group, although more severe systemic reactions were observed during the maintenance phase.

Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy: A Secondary Analysis of Post-marketing Adverse Events Reports Using a Japanese Public Database

Purpose Allergic rhinitis impacts a significant portion of the Japanese population, leading to the rise of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) as an alternative treatment. Despite its growing popularity, there is limited safety information. Therefore, this study aimed to consolidate data on its adverse effects in an academic context. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of adverse events reported in the Pharmaceutical Adverse Events Information Database for three SLIT drugs (Actair®, Cedarcure®, and Miticure®) approved in Japan. A descriptive analysis concerning age, gender, underlying diseases, symptoms, time of onset, and outcomes was performed. Results We identified 98 cases of adverse reactions reported for the SLIT drugs. These cases were mainly from the pediatric to adolescent group (73.7%). Males made up 59.5% of reports. Recovery or improvement was noted in 97.7% of reports. Anaphylactic reactions were the most common adverse event (42.6%), followed by respiratory distress (12.2%). Reactions typically occurred within one week of starting treatment (54.1%). Conclusions Our research illuminated the safety of SLIT drugs in Japan, revealing a favorable profile. It underscores the need for vigilance, particularly among younger patients and during initial doses, emphasizing the importance of proper patient selection and further research to enhance the treatment's efficacy.

Efficacy and immunological changes of sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric allergic rhinitis

Background

Allergen-specific immunotherapy, including subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), improves the disease progression of allergic rhinitis (AR). SCIT and SLIT exhibit similar efficacy, but SLIT has less systemic reactions. However, few studies have investigated the underlying mechanisms of SLIT treatment. In this study, we explored the efficacy of SLIT under different treatment durations and immunological changes.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted from August 2017 to August 2022 in our hospital. A total of 314 children who underwent SLIT were divided into the following groups based on their treatment duration: the 1 year group (6 months-1 year), the 2 years group (1-2 years), and the 3 years group (2-3 years). The treatment efficacy was confirmed using a combined symptom and medication score (SMS). Multiple serum cytokines were measured using Luminex. Various immune cells in PBMCs were determined using flow cytometry.

Results

The total nasal symptom score (TNSS), rescue medication score (RMS), and SMS of the 3 years group was significantly different from those of the 1 years and 2 years groups. At the end of the 2 years following cessation of SLIT, the following results were observed in the 3 years group: 1) the TNSS, RMS, and SMS had significantly improved, 2) the serum IL-10, TGF-beta, and IL-35 levels had increased significantly, and 3) the percentages of regulatory T cell, regulatory B cell, and follicular regulatory T cell increased significantly.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that 3 years of SLIT is necessary for long-term effects and continued immunological changes.

Sustained antigens delivery using composite microneedles for effective epicutaneous immunotherapy

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is a desirable way of therapy for various allergic diseases such as food allergy (FA). However, frequent visits for more than 3 years and potential adverse effects often hinder patient compliance. Recently, many researchers started focusing on microneedles (MNs) as a new method for SIT. In this study, we proposed an implantable MNs system produced by a two-step casting process, consisting of OVA (antigen)-loaded silk microneedles and a dissolvable, flexible polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) pedestal. Different from PVA, silk fibroin hydrogel has preferable vaccine release ability in vivo and in vitro. Once MNs are inserted into the skin, the PVA pedestal can dissolve in the interstitial fluid of the excised skin within 5 min and implant the OVA-loaded silk microneedle tips in dermal layer as a sustained antigen depot, thus inducing long-lasting immune response for at least 2 weeks. After receiving 3 doses of MN-based immunotherapy, the immune response in OVA-sensitized mice was successfully suppressed, with no apparent side effects. Compared to conventional subcutaneous immunotherapy (total dose of 150 [Formula: see text]g), MN immunotherapy ameliorated systemic anaphylaxis more effectively even at a lower dose (total dose of 30 [Formula: see text]g), demonstrating the antigen dose-sparing potential of the proposed MNs. Moreover, due to the prolonged release effect of silk-PVA composite MNs, the frequency of immunotherapy can be significantly reduced. To sum up, through prolonged skin exposure to antigen, this implantable designed MN may offer a new therapeutic strategy for FA treatment with significant improvements in efficacy and convenience. Schematic illustration of silk-PVA composite microneedles, consisting of OVA (antigen)-loaded silk microneedles and a dissolvable, flexible PVA pedestal. Once inserted into the skin, the PVA pedestal can dissolve in the interstitial fluid of the excised skin within 5 min. Subsequently, the OVA-loaded silk microneedle tips were implanted in the dermal layer as a sustained antigen depot and induced long-lasting immune response. This MNs-based immunotherapy can significantly modulate the Th1/Th2 imbalance of sensitized mice.

Potential Effects of AIT on Nonspecific Allergic Immune Responses or Symptoms

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a treatment in which clinically corresponding allergens are administered to patients with allergic diseases, either by subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), or by oral immunotherapy (OIT) in the case of food allergy. Since etiological allergens are administered to patients, AIT is presumed to modify mainly allergen-specific immune responses. In bronchial asthma, AIT with house dust mites (HDM) alleviates clinical symptoms, suppresses airway hyperresponsiveness, and reduces medication doses of HDM-sensitive asthmatics. Moreover, AIT can suppress the symptoms of other allergic diseases associated with asthma including allergic rhinitis. However, AIT sometimes reduces allergic symptoms not induced by the responsible allergens, such as non-targeted allergens, in clinical settings. Furthermore, AIT can suppress the spread of sensitization to new allergens that are not targeted allergens by AIT, suggesting the suppression of allergic immune responses in an allergen-nonspecific manner. In this review, the nonspecific suppression of allergic immune responses by AIT is discussed. AIT has been reported to increase regulatory T cells that produce IL-10, transforming growth factor-β, and IL-35, IL-10-producing regulatory B cells, and IL-10-producing innate lymphoid cells. These cells can suppress type-2 mediated immune responses mainly through the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines or a cell-cell contact mechanism, which may be involved in the nonspecific suppression of allergic immune responses by AIT.

Clinical and experimental treatment of allergic asthma with an emphasis on allergen immunotherapy and its mechanisms

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is currently the only form of treatment that modifies allergic asthma. Pharmacotherapy alone seeks to control the symptoms of allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, and other atopic conditions. In contrast, AIT can induce long-term physiological modifications through the immune system. AIT enables individuals to live improved lives many years after treatment ends, where they are desensitized to the allergen(s) used or no longer have significant allergic reactions upon allergen provocation. The leading forms of treatment with AIT involve injections of allergen extracts with increasing doses via the subcutaneous route or drops/tablets via the sublingual route for several years. Since the initial attempts at this treatment as early as 1911 by Leonard Noon, the mechanisms by which AIT operates remain unclear. This literature-based review provides the primary care practitioner with a current understanding of the mechanisms of AIT, including its treatment safety, protocols, and long-term efficacy. The primary mechanisms underlying AIT include changes in immunoglobulin classes (IgA, IgE, and IgG), immunosuppressive regulatory T-cell induction, helper T cell type 2 to helper T cell type 1 cell/cytokine profile shifts, decreased early-phase reaction activity and mediators, and increased production of IL-10, IL-35, TGF-β, and IFN-γ. Using the databases PubMed and Embase, a selective literature search was conducted searching for English, full-text, reviews published between 2015 and 2022 using the keywords (with wildcards) "allerg*," "immunotherap*," "mechanis*," and "asthma." Among the cited references, additional references were identified using a manual search.

Systematic review of real-world persistence and adherence in subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Given that subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) adherence in the literature is often studied in closely monitored trials, few studies report real-world SCIT adherence. The purpose of this review is to assess SCIT adherence in real-world settings.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus for real-world studies examining SCIT adherence was performed. Paired investigators independently reviewed all articles. For this review, "persistence" was defined as continuing therapy and not being lost to follow-up after initiating SCIT, and "adherence" defined as persistence in accordance with prescribed SCIT dose, dosing schedule, and duration. Article quality was first assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and then converted to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards (good, fair, and poor).

RESULTS

The search yielded 1596 nonduplicate abstracts, from which 17 articles (n = 263,221 patients) met inclusion criteria. Fourteen (82%) studies reported persistence rates, ranging from 16.0% to 93.7%. Seven (41%) studies reported adherence rates, ranging from 15.1% to 99%. Five (29%) studies (n = 416 patients) collected original data on reasons for discontinuing SCIT, of which inconvenience was most cited. All studies were Oxford level of evidence 2b and of good (n = 10) to fair (n = 7) quality.

CONCLUSION

Real-world SCIT persistence and adherence rates are poor, with the majority of included studies reporting rates <80%; however, they range widely, explained in part by inter-study differences in measuring and reporting adherence-related findings. Future studies on SCIT adherence may benefit from following concordant definitions of persistence and adherence in addition to standardized reporting metrics.

IgE and IgG4 Epitopes of Dermatophagoides and Blomia Allergens before and after Sublingual Immunotherapy

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is used worldwide to treat house dust mites (HDM) allergy. Epitope specific immunotherapy with peptide vaccines is used far less, but it is of great interest in the treatment of allergic reactions, as it precludes the drawbacks of allergen extracts. The ideal peptide candidates would bind to IgG, blocking IgE-binding. To better elucidate IgE and IgG4 epitope profiles during SLIT, sequences of main allergens, Der p 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 23 and Blo t 5, 6, 12, 13, were included in a 15-mer peptide microarray and tested against pooled sera from 10 patients pre- and post-1-year SLIT. All allergens were recognized to some extent by at least one antibody isotype and peptide diversity was higher post-1-year SLIT for both antibodies. IgE recognition diversity varied among allergens and timepoints without a clear tendency. Der p 10, a minor allergen in temperate regions, was the molecule with more IgE-peptides and might be a major allergen in populations highly exposed to helminths and cockroaches, such as Brazil. SLIT-induced IgG4 epitopes were directed against several, but not all, IgE-binding regions. We selected a set of peptides that recognized only IgG4 or were able to induce increased ratios of IgG4:IgE after one year of treatment and might be potential targets for vaccines.

A Cost-Utility Analysis of SQ® Tree SLIT-Tablet versus Placebo in the Treatment of Birch Pollen Allergic Rhinitis from a Swedish Societal Perspective

Background and Aims

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an immunoglobulin E antibody-mediated inflammatory condition that arises in response to inhaled allergens such as pollen. Pollens from trees in the birch homologous group are the most common allergenic tree pollens in Northern and Central Europe and North America. SQ® Tree SLIT-Tablet (ITULAZAX®) is a sublingual immunotherapy tablet indicated for moderate-to-severe AR and/or conjunctivitis induced by pollen from the birch homologous group. The present analysis evaluated the cost-utility of treating adults with AR with SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet versus placebo, both in combination with symptom-relieving medications, from a Swedish societal perspective.

Methods

A model was developed to evaluate changes in cost and quality of life associated with using SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet relative to placebo in an adult population of individuals with AR. The model captured costs associated with symptom-relieving medications, healthcare professional interactions, SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet, and indirect costs arising from absenteeism and reduced workplace productivity. The analysis was conducted over 10 years with costs captured in 2021 Swedish Krona (SEK) and future costs and effects discounted at 3% per annum. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results

Treatment with SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet resulted in an improvement of 0.041 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 10 years versus placebo. From a Swedish societal perspective, costs increased by SEK 9077 over the same period, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio of SEK 223,445 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model was most sensitive to assumptions around the disease-modifying effect of SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet.

Conclusion

SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet improved quality of life in moderate-to-severe AR and/or conjunctivitis induced by pollen from the birch homologous group in Sweden, with only a modest increase in societal costs over a medium-term time horizon, representing good value for money at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SEK 700,000 per QALY.

Malaysian Society of Allergy and Immunology Consensus Statement on Sublingual Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an IgE-mediated inflammatory disease of the upper airway. AR affects the patients' quality of life, is a known risk factor for asthma and a socio-economic burden. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), comprising sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), involves administering increasing doses of the causative allergen to induce clinical and immunologic tolerance to the allergens. It is the only currently available treatment for AR that has been proven to induce disease-modifying effects (i.e., long-term remission of allergic symptoms or potential prevention of asthma and new sensitizations). Although AIT is conventionally recommended for patients who are non-responsive to symptom-relieving pharmacotherapy, it is presently recommended as a first-line treatment for patients with moderate to severe AR who prefer a treatment with the potential for long-term remission. In light of the relatively recent implementation of AIT in Malaysia, guidelines on its appropriate indication and application are important to attain optimal outcomes. This consensus statement was developed by an expert group formed by the Malaysian Society of Allergy and Immunology to provide evidence-based recommendations for the practice of AIT in Malaysia. Patient and product selection, choice of AIT, and strategy towards an effective treatment outcome in AIT are presented.

Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Allergen Immunotherapy-Treated Mice Suppressed IL-5 Production from Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), such as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), is a treatment targeting the causes of allergic diseases. The roles of extracellular vesicles (EVs), bilayer lipid membrane blebs released from all types of cells, in AIT have not been clarified. To examine the roles of EVs in SCIT, it was analyzed whether (1) EVs are phenotypically changed by treatment with SCIT, and (2) EVs derived from SCIT treatment suppress the function of group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s), which are major cells contributing to type 2 allergic inflammation. As a result, (1) expression of CD9, a canonical EV marker, was highly up-regulated by SCIT in a murine model of asthma; and (2) IL-5 production from ILC2s in vitro was significantly decreased by the addition of serum EVs derived from SCIT-treated but not non-SCIT-treated mice. In conclusion, it was indicated that EVs were transformed by SCIT, changing to a suppressive phenotype of type 2 allergic inflammation.

Good clinical practice recommendations in allergen immunotherapy: Position paper of the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology - ASBAI

Background

Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) represents one of the pillars in the treatment of allergic diseases. AIT is the only therapeutic strategy with curative potential, promoting the reduction of drug use and long-term symptom control even after the end of the treatment. The European Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (EAACI) guidelines, position papers of World Allergy Organization (WAO), and the US Practice Parameters are the leading official documents that set scientific standard for the use of AIT in the world. The use of AIT in Brazil has specific regional conditions due to the pattern of allergen sensitization, as well as genetic, socioeconomic, and cultural characteristics, climate conditions, and the availability of allergenic extracts. The most prevalent house dust mites are Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae and their allergens have the highest clinical relevance. Blomia tropicalis is also very frequent. This position paper has been prepared by the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (ASBAI) Taskforce on AIT for respiratory allergy and Hymenoptera venom allergy.

Objective

According to the current scientific literature adapted to the Brazilian reality, this position paper aims to establish the main recommendations for the good clinical practice parameters for AIT in Brazil.

Methods

A systematic review using the Pub Med and Cochrane databases was performed, and the websites of major allergy and immunology organizations were consulted. The research was limited to English language literature and was conducted between March 30, 2002, and March 30, 2022. The terms used for the research were: Allergen Immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), venom-specific immunotherapy (VIT), and allergen extract.

Results

The several recommendations that establish the clinical practices for AIT recommended by the main Allergy, Asthma and Immunology world organizations were analyzed and adapted to the Brazilian situation.

Conclusion

This position paper establishes the main recommendations for the effective clinical practice of AIT in Brazil, using current knowledge of evidence-based medicine and precision medicine.

Sublingual immunotherapy persistence and adherence in real-world settings: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) adherence in the literature is often evaluated in closely monitored trials that may impact patient behavior; real-world SLIT adherence is relatively unknown. This systematic review intends to assess SLIT adherence in studies that reflect real-world settings.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus for real-world studies examining SLIT adherence was performed. Monitored clinical trials were excluded. Paired investigators independently reviewed all articles. For this review, "persistence" was defined as continuing therapy and not being lost to follow-up and "adherence" as persistence in accordance with prescribed SLIT dose, dosing schedule, and duration. Article quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and then converted to AHRQ standards (good, fair, and poor).

RESULTS

The search yielded 1596 nonduplicate abstracts, from which 32 articles (n = 63,683 patients) met criteria. Twenty-six (81%) studies reported persistence rates ranging from 7.0% to 88.7%, and 18 (56%) reported adherence rates ranging from 9.6% to 97.0%. Twenty-one (66%) studies surveyed reasons for discontinuing SLIT. All studies were Oxford level of evidence 2b and of good (n = 12) to fair (n = 20) quality.

CONCLUSION

Reported rates of real-world SLIT persistence and adherence varied widely by study methodology (e.g., follow-up duration, objective vs subjective assessment). Studies with longer follow-up generally reported lower rates; 3-year persistence ranged from 7% to 59.0% and 3-year adherence from 9.6% to 49.0%. Future studies of SLIT adherence would benefit from following concordant definitions of persistence/adherence and standardized reporting metrics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Roles of type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells in allergen-specific immunotherapy

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causative treatment for allergic diseases by modification of the immune response to allergens. A key feature of AIT is to induce immunotolerance to allergens by generating antigen-specific regulatory T (Treg) cells in allergic patients. Type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells and forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3)-expressing Treg cells are well known among Treg cell subsets. Foxp3 was identified as a master transcription factor of Treg cells, and its expression is necessary for their suppressive activity. In contrast to Foxp3⁺ Treg cells, the master transcription factor of Tr1 cells has not been elucidated. Nevertheless, Tr1 cells are generally considered as a distinct subset of Treg cells induced in the periphery during antigen exposure in tolerogenic conditions and can produce large amounts of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-β, followed by down-regulation of the function of effector immune cells independently of Foxp3 expression. Since the discovery of Tr1 cells more than 20 years ago, research on Tr1 cells has expanded our understanding of the mechanism of AIT. Although the direct precursors and true identity of these cells continues to be disputed, we and others have demonstrated that Tr1 cells are induced in the periphery by AIT, and the induced cells are re-activated by antigens, followed by suppression of allergic symptoms. In this review, we discuss the immune mechanisms for the induction of Tr1 cells by AIT and the immune-suppressive roles of Tr1 cells in AIT.

Delivery options for sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: clinical considerations for North America

Background: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) can be delivered via tablets (SLIT-T) or aqueous drops (SLIT-D). SLIT-D dosing recommendations using North American extracts were published in 2015. We review the 2015 recommendations in the context of recent research, and compare and contrast dosing, efficacy, safety, adherence, and cost of SLIT-T and SLIT-D for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) in North America. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of SLIT-D and SLIT-T trials were identified by a systematic PubMed search through March 1, 2022. Results: Dose-finding studies have been conducted for all approved SLIT-T; efficacy in North American populations was demonstrated in 11 RCTs. Approved SLIT-T are uniform internationally. Few dose-finding studies for SLIT-D have been conducted using North American extracts; efficacy was demonstrated in 2 RCTs. Extrapolation of dosing from SLIT-D studies conducted with extracts from other geographic regions is unreliable. Since the 2015 SLIT-D dosing recommendations, no new RCTs of SLIT-D have been conducted with North American extracts, whereas 6 SLIT-T RCTs have since been conducted in North America. Local allergic reactions are the most common adverse events with SLIT-T and SLIT-D, but both can induce systemic allergic reactions. Adherence to SLIT-D and SLIT-T remains a challenge. Patients must pay for SLIT-D directly, whereas SLIT-T is usually covered by insurance. Conclusion: As part of shared decision-making, patients should be informed about the scientific evidence supporting the use of SLIT-T and SLIT-D for ARC.

Allergen Immunotherapy: Current and Future Trends

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the sole disease-modifying treatment for allergic rhinitis; it prevents rhinitis from progressing to asthma and lowers medication use. AIT against mites, insect venom, and certain kinds of pollen is effective. The mechanism of action of AIT is based on inducing immunological tolerance characterized by increased IL-10, TGF-β, and IgG4 levels and Treg cell counts. However, AIT requires prolonged schemes of administration and is sometimes associated with adverse reactions. Over the last decade, novel forms of AIT have been developed, focused on better allergen identification, structural modifications to preserve epitopes for B or T cells, post-traductional alteration through chemical processes, and the addition of adjuvants. These modified allergens induce clinical-immunological effects similar to those mentioned above, increasing the tolerance to other related allergens but with fewer side effects. Clinical studies have shown that molecular AIT is efficient in treating grass and birch allergies. This article reviews the possibility of a new AIT to improve the treatment of allergic illness.

[Analysis of allergen distribution and clinical characteristics of autumn allergic rhinitis in Changchun and surrounding areas]

Objective:To investigate the allergen characteristics, allergen distribution and clinical symptoms of autumn allergic rhinitis in Changchun and surrounding areas. Methods:The allergen test results of 1080 allergic rhinitis（AR） suspected patients from Changchun and surrounding areas were collected, from August to October 2019 and August to October 2020 in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University. The positive rates of major allergens and their differences in gender, age, different years and clinical symptom were compared and analyzed. Results:①Among the 1080 suspected AR patients, 804 patients（74.44%） had positive allergens. ②The top 3 allergens of autumn AR in Changchun and surrounding areas were Artemisia（36.20%）, Dwarf ragweed（33.24%） and Candida/Penicillium notarum/Cladosporium/Alternaria/Aspergillus niger（19.81%）. The positive rates of Artemisia and Dwarf ragweed were higher in men than in women（P<0.05）. ③Artemisia was the major allergen of autumn AR in juvenile group, youth group and middle-aged group. ④The positive rate of two or more allergens was 2.39 times that of single allergen. ⑤Patients with positive autumn pollen allergens had more severe symptoms of nasal congestion, red eye/eye itching and epiphora than those in other groups. Conclusion:Seasonal AR had typical clinical symptom characteristics. Major allergens in autumn AR in Changchun and surrounding areas are autumn pollen allergens（Artemisia, Dwarf ragweed, Humulus）. The distribution of those allergens was different in gender, age, and different years.

Allergen Immunotherapy in Asthma

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a specific treatment involving the administration of relevant allergens to allergic patients, with subtypes including subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). In asthma, AIT using the house dust mite (HDM) alleviates clinical symptoms and decreases airway hyper responsiveness and medication dose. In addition, AIT can improve the natural course of asthma. For example, the effects of AIT can be preserved for at least a few years, even after ending treatment. AIT may increase the remission rate of asthma in children and suppress sensitization to new allergens. If AIT is introduced in pollinosis, AIT may prevent the development of asthma. Moreover, AIT can control other allergic diseases complicated by asthma, such as allergic rhinitis, which also improves the control of asthma. The indication of HDM-SCIT for asthma is mild-to-moderate HDM-sensitized allergic asthma in a patient with normal respiratory function. To date, HDM-SLIT is applicable in Japan for allergic rhinitis, not for asthma. However, the effect of SLIT on asthma has been confirmed internationally, and SLIT is available for asthma in Japan if allergic rhinitis is present as a complication.

Effectiveness of Sublingual Immunotherapy in the Treatment of HDM-Induced Nasobronchial Allergies: A 3-Year Randomized Case-Control Study From Kashmir

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic disorders that induces immunological tolerance through administration of specific allergens. Studies on AIT for subcutaneous route are in abundance; however, the efficacy of AIT in tablet form through sublingual route has not been well elucidated. The present prospective, parallel-group, controlled study sought to compare the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets with pharmacotherapy (PT) in 332 house dust mite (HDM)-specific allergic asthma and/or rhinitis patients over a period of 3 years. Patients were followed up for a 6-month run-in period and then randomly stratified as those who would receive SLIT, SLIT in addition to PT (SLIT+PT), and PT alone. AIT was administered in the form of sublingual tablets. Symptom and medication scores were measured every 3 months. In vitro evaluation of serum total and HDM specific immunoglobulin E (HDM sIgE) levels was carried out every 3 months, whereas in vivo skin prick test was performed annually for 3 years. Our study demonstrated sustained clinical improvement, reduction in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and duration as well as prevention from development of neosensitization to other aero allergens in HDM-allergic asthmatics and/or rhinitis patients treated with 3 years SLIT. Despite a remarkable clinical improvement with AIT, we observed that SLIT did not significantly change the skin reactivity to HDM at 3 years and there was no significant change in the ratio of serum total and HDM sIgE. Given the immune and disease modifying effects of AIT in allergic diseases, the present study supports the notion of its sublingual mode being an effective long-term immunomodulator in HDM-sensitized nasobronchial allergies.

Allergic Rhinitis in Children and Adolescents

Allergic rhinitis is a common disorder that regularly occurs in children and adolescents. The disease is associated with other allergic diseases, such as asthma, and it carries a heavy burden, with effects on sleep, school performance, and quality of life. Classic symptoms include sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, and nasal itching. When the eyes are involved, the term allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is used. Triggers may include airborne pollens, molds, dust mites, and animals. Skin or blood allergy testing can be a useful diagnostic modality that may guide therapy. Immunotherapy can prevent the development of further allergic sensitizations as well as subsequent asthma.

Allergen immunotherapy: The growing role of observational and randomized trial "Real-World Evidence"

BACKGROUND

Although there is a considerable body of knowledge about allergen immunotherapy (AIT), there is a lack of data on the reliability of real-world evidence (RWE) in AIT, and consequently, a lack of information on how AIT effectively works in real life.

METHODS

To address the current unmet need for an appraisal of the quality of RWE in AIT, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Methodology Committee recently initiated a systematic review of observational studies of AIT, which will use the RELEVANT tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE) to rate the quality of the evidence base as a whole. The next step will be to develop a broadly applicable, pragmatic "real-world" database using systematic data collection. Based on the current RWE base, and perspectives and recommendations of authorities and scientific societies, a hierarchy of RWE in AIT is proposed, which places pragmatic trials and registry data at the positions of highest level of evidence.

KEY RESULTS

There is a need to establish more AIT registries that collect data in a cohesive way, using standardized protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

This will provide an essential source of real-world data that can be easily shared, promoting evidence-based research and quality improvement in study design and clinical decision-making.

Disease-Modifying Effect of Japanese Cedar Pollen Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablets

BACKGROUND

Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis is a common allergic rhinitis in Japan. JC pollen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets are licensed for the treatment of JC pollinosis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the disease-modifying effects of JC pollen SLIT tablets over 5 years (2014-2019), comprising a 3-year treatment period and 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 1042 patients with JC pollinosis (aged 5-64 years) were included in the study. An optimal dose-finding study was performed in the first 15 months, after which 240 patients in the placebo (P) group and 236 patients in the optimal active dose (A) group (5000 Japanese allergy units) were re-randomized to receive P or A for an additional 18 months (designated AA, AP, PA, and PP groups). Clinical efficacy was evaluated by the total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS) during the peak symptom period of each JC pollen season over 3 years of treatment and 2 years of observation after treatment cessation.

RESULTS

The AA, AP, and PA groups exhibited significantly reduced TNSMS; however, the largest relative reduction was seen in the AA group both during the treatment period (third season, 46.3% vs PP, P < .001) and during the 2-year follow-up period (fourth and fifth seasons, 45.3% and 34.0% vs PP, respectively; P < .001). The most common adverse drug reactions were mild reactions at the administration site.

CONCLUSIONS

JC pollen SLIT tablets show sustained clinical efficacy during 3 years of treatment and sustained disease-modifying effects for at least 2 years after treatment cessation.

Sublingual immunotherapy for 4 years increased the number of Foxp3+ Treg cells, which correlated with clinical effects

OBJECTIVE

At least 3 years of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is required to achieve long-term clinical tolerance for allergens. However, immunological changes with more than 3 years of SLIT have not yet been elucidated in detail. The present study investigated whether the numbers of regulatory T (Treg) cells and regulatory B (Breg) cells increased with 4 years of SLIT and if these increases correlated with clinical effects for pollinosis.

METHODS

Seven Japanese cedar pollinosis patients received SLIT in 2014 or 2015 and continued treatment until May 2019. In May 2017 and May 2019, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from the patients, and analyzed by flow cytometer.

RESULTS

(1) The visual analogue scale (VAS) was significantly higher in 2019 than in 2017. (2) The percentages of Foxp3⁺ Treg cells, type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells, and Breg cells in PBMCs were significantly higher in 2019 than in 2017. (3) The percentage of Foxp3⁺ Treg cells in PBMCs positively correlated with VAS, whereas those of Tr1 cells and Breg cells did not.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that 4 years of SLIT is needed to achieve sustained increases in Foxp3⁺ Treg cells, which are closely associated with the efficacy of SLIT.

Pharmacoeconomics of allergy immunotherapy versus pharmacotherapy

Introduction: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and other allergic conditions.Area covered: An extensive search of the PubMed and Medline database (January 1996 up to June of 2020) was conducted using the search terms allergy immunotherapy, pharmacoeconomics, cost-effectiveness, allergic rhinitis, and asthma. Studies were included if they included information on the economics of AIT in comparison to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis or asthma either as actual costs or based on theoretical models. Systematic reviews were included if they included information about the cost-effectiveness of AIT.Most clinical trials found significant cost-savings with AIT. The cost-effective time-point ranged from a few months to several years after treatment initiation.. Cost savings were demonstrated as early as 3 months after treatment initiation and were as great as 80% less than SDT in some studies.Expert opinion: There is strong evidence in the collective literature that AIT is cost-effective as compared to SDT alone. The magnitude of AIT's cost-effectiveness is likely underestimated because most of the studies considered during treatment costs and not AIT's long-term benefits or preventive/prophylactic effects or its impact on co-morbid conditions.

Recent Advances in Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy as Treatment for Allergic Asthma: A Practical Overview

The Global Initiative for Asthma Report updated in 2019 stated that potential benefits of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), compared to pharmacological and avoidance options, must be weighed against the risk of adverse effects and the inconvenience and cost of the prolonged course of therapy in asthma. Thus, with the aim of clarifying some aspects with regard to the possible use of AIT in allergic asthma treatment armamentarium, a group of expert allergists from the Spanish Allergy and Clinical Immunology Scientific Society (SEAIC), particularly from the Immunotherapy and Asthma Interest Groups developed a frequently asked questions in clinical practice. This document updates relevant topics on the use of AIT in asthma and could facilitate physician clinical decisions and improve health outcomes for individual patients.

CpG Adjuvant in Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: Finding the Sweet Spot for the Induction of Immune Tolerance

Prevalence and incidence of IgE-mediated allergic diseases have increased over the past years in developed and developing countries. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is currently the only curative treatment available for allergic diseases that has long-term efficacy. Although AIT has been proven successful as an immunomodulatory therapy since its beginnings, it still faces several unmet needs and challenges today. For instance, some patients can experience severe side effects, others are non-responders, and prolonged treatment schedules can lead to lack of patient adherence and therapy discontinuation. A common strategy to improve AIT relies on the use of adjuvants and immune modulators to boost its effects and improve its safety. Among the adjuvants tested for their clinical efficacy, CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG-ODN) was investigated with limited success and without reaching phase III trials for clinical allergy treatment. However, recently discovered immune tolerance-promoting properties of CpG-ODN place this adjuvant again in a prominent position as an immune modulator for the treatment of allergic diseases. Indeed, it has been shown that the CpG-ODN dose and concentration are crucial in promoting immune regulation through the recruitment of pDCs. While low doses induce an inflammatory response, high doses of CpG-ODN trigger a tolerogenic response that can reverse a pre-established allergic milieu. Consistently, CpG-ODN has also been found to stimulate IL-10 producing B cells, so-called B regulatory cells (Bregs). Accordingly, CpG-ODN has shown its capacity to prevent and revert allergic reactions in several animal models showing its potential as both preventive and active treatment for IgE-mediated allergy. In this review, we describe how CpG-ODN-based therapies for allergic diseases, despite having shown limited success in the past, can still be exploited further as an adjuvant or immune modulator in the context of AIT and deserves additional attention. Here, we discuss the past and current knowledge, which highlights CpG-ODN as a potential adjuvant to be reevaluated for the enhancement of AIT when used in appropriate conditions and formulations.

Modulating Th2 Cell Immunity for the Treatment of Asthma

It is estimated that more than 339 million people worldwide suffer from asthma. The leading cause of asthma development is the breakdown of immune tolerance to inhaled allergens, prompting the immune system's aberrant activation. During the early phase, also known as the sensitization phase, allergen-specific T cells are activated and become central players in orchestrating the subsequent development of allergic asthma following secondary exposure to the same allergens. It is well-established that allergen-specific T helper 2 (Th2) cells play central roles in developing allergic asthma. As such, 80% of children and 60% of adult asthma cases are linked to an unwarranted Th2 cell response against respiratory allergens. Thus, targeting essential components of Th2-type inflammation using neutralizing antibodies against key Th2 modulators has recently become an attractive option for asthmatic patients with moderate to severe symptoms. In addition to directly targeting Th2 mediators, allergen immunotherapy, also known as desensitization, is focused on redirecting the allergen-specific T cells response from a Th2-type profile to a tolerogenic one. This review highlights the current understanding of the heterogeneity of the Th2 cell compartment, their contribution to allergen-induced airway inflammation, and the therapies targeting the Th2 cell pathway in asthma. Further, we discuss available new leads for successful targeting pulmonary Th2 cell responses for future therapeutics.

Long-term sublingual immunotherapy provides better effects for patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis

OBJECTIVE

Japanese cedar pollinosis is an endemic disease affecting a large proportion of Japan's population. Five seasons have passed since sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis was included in the public insurance coverage in Japan. In this study, we evaluated the clinical effects of long-term SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis on upper respiratory symptoms primarily represented by nasal symptoms and inflammation of the respiratory tract in the 2019 season, in which considerable amount of cedar pollen was dispersed.

METHODS

This study involved 95 patients who were undergoing SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis after the initiation at some point between 2014 and 2018, and this group of patients was compared with a control group comprising 21 patients receiving preseasonal prophylactic treatment (with a second-generation antihistaminic drug). We evaluated the patients' nasal/eye symptoms, total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS), and quality of life according to relevant guidelines. In addition, the levels of peripheral blood eosinophils, serum total IgE, Japanese cedar antigen-specific IgE, Cryj1-specific IgG4, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) were measured as objective indices.

RESULTS

From the fourth season (SLIT4), nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal obstruction symptoms, and TNSMS significantly decreased compared with those in the preseasonal prophylactic treatment and SLIT1 groups. In the patients suspected to have eosinophilic airway inflammation (with a baseline FENO ≥25 ppb), the interannual variability of FENO levels significantly reduced after 5 years of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of SLIT was noted from the first year of treatment, even in a year when pollen profusely dispersed. Thus, long-term continuous treatment with SLIT may alleviate nasal symptoms as well as eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Effects of sublingual immunotherapy on nasal symptoms and sleep disturbance in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis

OBJECTIVE

Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis is the most common seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR) in Japan. AR reduces the quality of life not only because of nasal symptoms but also because of sleep disturbance. In the present study, we investigated the effects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with a standardized JC pollen extract on nasal symptoms and AR-related sleep disturbance in patients with JC pollinosis.

METHODS

In the present non-randomized controlled study, we assigned thirty-one patients with JC pollinosis who received SLIT into the SLIT group, and another thirty-eight patients with JC pollinosis who visited our hospital without treatment into the untreated group. We evaluated nasal symptoms and sleep disturbance using the classification of the severity of AR symptoms and the Athens Insomnia Scale, respectively.

RESULTS

The nasal symptom scores and the Athens Insomnia Scale scores of patients in the SLIT group were both significantly lower than those of patients in the untreated group. There was a significant correlation between total nasal symptom scores and the Athens Insomnia Scale scores.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that SLIT with JC pollen extract suppressed nasal symptoms in patients with JC pollinosis, leading to improvements in AR-related sleep disturbance and daytime troubles with daily life.

Long-term treatment of Japanese cedar pollinosis with Japanese cedar pollen SLIT drops and persistence of treatment effect: A post-marketing clinical trial

BACKGROUND

There have been no reports of treatment effect persistence after long-term sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis. Therefore, we conducted a post-marketing clinical trial to investigate the efficacy, safety, and effect persistence of JC pollen SLIT drops after approximately 3 years of treatment.

METHODS

This was an open-label trial of 233 patients with JC pollinosis who were treated with JC pollen SLIT drops for approximately 3 years (2015-2017) and followed-up for an additional 2 years (2018-2019). Efficacy and effect persistence were evaluated using nasal and ocular symptom scores, daily use of rescue medication, and Japanese Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores recorded during the JC pollen dispersal season of each year. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

The mean combined total nasal symptom and medication score (range 0-18) during the peak symptom periods of 2015 through 2019 were 5.47 ± 3.38, 4.52 ± 3.13, 3.58 ± 2.63, 5.28 ± 4.01, and 6.83 ± 4.65, respectively. The percentage of patients who used no rescue medications during the same periods was 64.8%, 75.2%, 80.3%, 63.7%, and 50.3%, respectively. A total of 138 adverse drug reaction incidents were recorded in 73 of the 233 patients (31.3%), of which 134 incidents (97.1%) were mild in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

JC pollen SLIT drops demonstrated treatment duration-dependent efficacy with effects that persisted for 2 years after cessation of treatment. The drug had a favorable safety profile over the 5-year study period.

Role of Allergen Immunotherapy in Asthma Treatment and Asthma Development

Allergen immunotherapy may modify the natural course of allergic diseases and induce remission. It includes subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). For asthma, allergen immunotherapy using house dust mite (HDM) improves clinical symptoms and airway hyperresponsiveness and decreases drug requirements. Furthermore, it has been suggested that allergen immunotherapy also has the following effects: (1) the effect can be maintained for more than a year even if the treatment is terminated, (2) the remission rate of childhood asthma can be increased, (3) new allergen sensitization can be suppressed, and (4) asthma development can be prevented if allergen immunotherapy was performed in the case of pollinosis. Allergen immunotherapy differs from conventional drug therapy, in particular the effect of modifying the natural course of allergic diseases and the effect of controlling complicated allergic diseases such as rhinoconjunctivitis. The general indication for HDM-SCIT in asthma is HDM-sensitized atopic asthma with mild-to-moderate disease and normal respiratory function. HDM allergens should be involved in the pathogenesis of asthma, and a duration of illness of less than 10 years is desirable. HDM-SLIT is available for allergic rhinitis but not for asthma in Japan. However, as the efficacy of SLIT for asthma has been fully proven internationally, SLIT is also applied in asthmatics with complicated allergic rhinitis in Japan.

Predictors of Completion of Sublingual Immunotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has emerged as an effective treatment alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) given its improved safety profile and more convenient dosing. However, SLIT still relies on daily dosing for many years to optimize effectiveness. This study sought to investigate factors that influence patient completion of SLIT.

METHODS

We performed an institutional retrospective review of patients who received SLIT (2008-2020). Completion was defined as completing at least 36 months of SLIT. Patient demographics and characteristics, including the number of allergens treated, history of asthma and sinus surgery, number of clinic visits, and total time undergoing SLIT, were documented. Multivariate models were used to analyze predictors of SLIT completion. Subgroup analysis was performed among pediatric patients and patients who discontinued SLIT.

RESULTS

Of the 404 total patients, 249 (61.6%) discontinued, 47 (11.6%) completed, and 108 (26.7%) were currently undergoing SLIT. The mean duration of therapy was 11.2 months for those who discontinued and 49.4 months for patients who completed SLIT. The odds of SLIT completion were twice as high with each additional clinic visit (P < .001), and twice as high when the dosage was increased during therapy (P = .06). Pediatric patients younger than age 12 with a history of asthma were over five times more likely to complete therapy (P = .045). Patients with more clinic visits (P < .001) and higher associated costs (P = .003) were less likely to be lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the frequency of clinic visits, improving therapy availability, and mitigating concerns about clinical efficacy may increase patient completion of SLIT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2111-E2115, 2021.

Safety, Efficacy, and Preventive Role of Subcutaneous and Sublingual Allergen Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Pediatric Asthma

Allergen-specific immunotherapy is currently the only treatment with the potential to modify and prevent progression of allergic asthma in children. In clinical practice, it is available in two forms: subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy. Trials and meta-analyses showed both the safety and the short- and long-term benefits of allergen-specific immunotherapy in asthmatic children. However, its use and role in asthma remains controversial, since studies are largely heterogeneous. This is mainly due to the lack of consensus on the optimal primary outcome to be considered for clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy in asthma. Therefore, well-conducted researchis needed using standardized and validated tools to evaluate key outcomes in asthmatic children.

Use of Sublingual Immunotherapy for Aeroallergens in Children with Asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease that in children is often allergen-driven with a type 2 inflammation. Sublingual immunotherapy represents an important progress in the use of personalized medicine in children with allergic asthma. It is a viable option for house dust mite-driven asthma and in subjects with the asthma associated with allergic rhinitis. The use and indications for isolated asthma caused by other allergens are still controversial owing to heterogeneity of commercially available products and methodological limitations of studies in children. Nevertheless, most studies and meta-analyses found the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy. Sublingual immunotherapy is safe but cannot be recommended in children with uncontrolled asthma.

Biologics and Allergy Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Allergic Diseases

Allergic diseases represent some of the most chronic and costly chronic conditions. Medical management may require long-term pharmacotherapy, which is often associated with poor adherence. Although medications provide symptomatic control, they do not modify the allergic disease. Patients may prefer disease-modifying treatments that provide lasting benefits after discontinuation. To date, allergy immunotherapy is the only proved disease modification therapy associated with lasting benefits after discontinuation. However, allergy immunotherapy safety and efficacy has only been established in allergic rhinitis, mild to moderate asthma, and some patients with atopic dermatitis.

Prevention of Asthma: Targets for Intervention

Approximately 300 million people worldwide are estimated to be affected by asthma, and the number of patients affected is growing exponentially-with potential for an additional 100 million people affected by the condition by 2025. With this increasing burden of disease, there is high motivation to discover effective prevention strategies. Strategies aimed at stalling the atopic progression, modifying the microbiome, preventing respiratory viral infections, and reducing the impact of toxin/pollutant exposure through dietary supplements have had limited success in the prevention of asthma. This is likely because asthma is heterogenous and is influenced by different genetic and environmental factors. Genes underlie a predisposition to asthma and allergic sensitization, whereas exposure to allergens, respiratory infections, and pollution may modify asthma pathogenesis and the variation in severity seen among individuals. Future advances in asthma prevention may include a more personalized approach: genetic variations among susceptible individuals with distinct asthma phenotypes or different biomarkers of disease may help individualize prevention strategies and render them more . In this article, we summarize interventions that have been studied for the prevention of asthma and identify some of the clinical trials that are actively underway in asthma prevention.