More than a decade follow-up in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma: The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) II

Identification of hub genes between moderate to severe asthma and early lung adenocarcinoma through bioinformatics analysis

The objective of this study was to explore the genetic link between moderate to severe asthma and early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) using bioinformatic methods. The Cancer Genome Atlas gene-expression profiles for early-stage LUAD and GSE76225 data set for moderate to severe asthma were selected for weighted gene co-expression network analysis, and intersected with the relevant module genes and selected hub genes; the relevant network of hub genes was then determined through a protein-protein interaction network. In addition, gene-set enrichment analysis and gene-set variation analysis (GSVA) were conducted on differentially expressed genes between normal and tumor groups. Gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway-enrichment analyses were applied to detect hub gene-related biological functions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to confirm the diagnostic value of hub genes. We identified four key genes, of which SFTPC exhibited relatively high value for areas under the ROC curves, indicating high diagnostic value for moderate to severe asthma. The clinical efficacy of SFTPC was thus consistent with GSVA results, indicating that moderate to severe asthma can inhibit the occurrence of early LUAD.

Birthing parent adverse childhood experiences and risk of atopic diseases in 5-year-old children

Following up on previous findings from the All Our Families (AOF) cohort, the current study investigated the relationship between birthing parent history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and child atopy, including asthma, allergy, and eczema, at five years of age. Potential indirect effects were explored. Participants completed the ACEs scale, validated questionnaires of anxiety and depression symptoms, and reported on their and their children's atopic disease history. Archival analyses of AOF data (N = 3,387) was conducted using logistic regression and path analysis with counterfactually based indirect effects. Birthing parent history of ACEs was associated with an 18% increased risk of child allergy at five years (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.20). Exploratory path analyses indicated a significant indirect effect of ACEs through birthing parent history of atopy on child asthma, allergy, and eczema at five years. There were no significant indirect effects through birthing parent symptoms of anxiety or depression during pregnancy, at two or five years postpartum. Birthing parent history of ACEs, combined with birthing parent history of atopy, may elevate the risk of child atopy. This presents an opportunity for early intervention for children at risk of atopic disease.

Understanding the impact of breathing pattern disorders in difficult-to-treat asthma

INTRODUCTION

Difficult-to-treat asthma is defined as asthma that is uncontrolled despite high-level treatment or requires such treatment to maintain good control and reduce exacerbations. Breathing pattern disorders (BPD) have been reported as a comorbidity in ~ 24-42% % of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. This narrative review will assess the association, impact, and management of BPD in difficult-to-treat asthma.

AREAS COVERED

We outline current understandings of the nature of difficult-to-treat asthma and BPD. We then review the impact of BPD on difficult-to-treat asthma and Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) approaches to assessing and managing BPD in this patient group. A comprehensive literature search was performed by an asthma specialist MDT including physiotherapists, psychologists, and physicians to create a holistic perspective on this subject.

EXPERT OPINION

BPD exerts significant negative impacts across multiple domains in patients with difficult-to treat asthma. There is a need for further observational, interventional, qualitative and quantitative research to develop better diagnosis, treatment, and awareness of the impacts of BPD including health economic analysis. Studies should develop multimodal approaches that better treat both BPD and associated comorbidities within the multimorbidity framework of difficult-to-treat asthma. Recognizing and addressing BPD should be key elements in future difficult-to-treat asthma management guidelines and clinical practice.

Treating severe paediatric asthma with mepolizumab or omalizumab: a protocol for the TREAT randomised non-inferiority trial

INTRODUCTION

A minority of school-aged children with asthma have persistent poor control and experience frequent asthma attacks despite maximal prescribed maintenance therapy. These children have higher morbidity and risk of death. The first add-on biologic therapy, omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks immunoglobulin (Ig)E, was licensed for children with severe asthma in 2005. While omalizumab is an effective treatment, non-response is common. A second biologic, mepolizumab which blocks interleukin 5 and targets eosinophilic inflammation, was licensed in 2018, but the licence was granted by extrapolation of adult clinical trial data to children. This non-inferiority (NI) trial will determine whether mepolizumab is as efficacious as omalizumab in reducing asthma attacks in children with severe therapy resistant asthma (STRA) and refractory difficult asthma (DA).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an ongoing multicentre 1:1 randomised NI open-label trial of mepolizumab and omalizumab. Up to 150 children and young people (CYP) aged 6-17 years with severe asthma will be recruited from specialist paediatric severe asthma centres in the UK. Prior to randomisation, children will be monitored for medication adherence for up to 16 weeks to determine STRA and refractory DA diagnoses. Current prescribing recommendations of serum IgE and blood eosinophils will not influence eligibility or enrolment. The primary outcome is the 52-week asthma attack rate. Bayesian analysis using clinician-elicited prior distributions will be used to calculate the posterior probability that mepolizumab is not inferior to omalizumab. Secondary outcomes include Composite Asthma Severity Index, Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, lung function measures (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), bronchodilator reversibility), fractional exhaled nitric oxide, Asthma Control Test (ACT), health outcomes EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and optimal serum IgE and blood eosinophil levels that may predict a response to therapy. These outcomes will be analysed in a frequentist framework using longitudinal models.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the South Central-Berkshire Research Ethics Committee REC Number 19/SC/0634 and had Clinical Trials Authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (EudraCT 2019-004085-17). All parents/legal guardians will give informed consent for their child to participate in the trial, and CYP will give assent to participate. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at international conferences and disseminated via our patient and public involvement partners.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN12109108; EudraCT Number: 2019-004085-17.

Expert consensus on oral corticosteroids stewardship for the treatment of severe asthma in the Middle East and Africa

In the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region, overuse of oral corticosteroids (OCS) for asthma management, both as burst and maintenance therapy, poses a significant challenge. Gaps in knowledge regarding the need to taper OCS in patients with severe asthma and the use of OCS in comorbid conditions have been noted. OCS stewardship can help attain optimal and effective OCS tapering along with reducing OCS overuse and over-reliance. In this paper, we discuss current practices regarding the use of OCS in asthma, globally and in the MEA region. Expert recommendations for achieving OCS stewardship in the MEA region have also been presented. Regional experts recommend increasing awareness among patients about the consequences of OCS overuse, engaging community pharmacists, and educating primary healthcare professionals about the benefits of prompt appropriate referral. Innovative local referral tools like ReferID can be utilized to refer patients with asthma to specialist care. The experts also endorse a multidisciplinary team approach and accelerating access to newer medicines like biologics to implement OCS stewardship and optimize asthma care in the MEA region.

Comparison of Asthma Phenotypes in Severe Asthma Cohorts (SARP, U-BIOPRED, ProAR and COREA) From 4 Continents

PURPOSE

Asthma is a clinical syndrome with various underlying pathomechanisms and clinical phenotypes. Genetic, ethnic, and geographic factors may influence the differences in clinical presentation, severity, and prognosis. We compared the characteristics of asthma based on the geographical background by analyzing representative cohorts from the United States, Europe, South America, and Asia using the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP), Unbiased Biomarkers for the Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes (U-BIOPRED), Program for Control of Asthma in Bahia (ProAR), and Cohort for Reality and Evolution of Adult Asthma in Korea (COREA), respectively.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics and medications for the SARP (n = 669), U-BIOPRED (n = 509), ProAR (n = 996), and COREA (n = 3,748) were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed for severe asthma.

RESULTS

The mean age was highest and lowest in the COREA and SARP, respectively. The asthma onset age was lowest in the ProAR. The mean body mass index was highest and lowest in the SARP and COREA, respectively. Baseline pulmonary function was lowest and highest in the U-BIOPRED and COREA, respectively. The number of patients with acute exacerbation in the previous year was highest in U-BIOPRED. The mean blood eosinophil count was highest in COREA. The total immunoglobulin E was highest in the ProAR. The frequency of atopy was highest in the SARP. The principal component analysis plot revealed differences among all cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The cohorts from 4 different continents exhibited different clinical and physiological characteristics, probably resulting from the interplay between genetic susceptibility and geographical factors.

Real-life studies and registries of severe asthma: The advent of digital technology

Severe asthma is a chronic and heterogeneous disease that negatively affects the quality of life of our patients and health care utilization. Given the remaining burden of uncontrolled disease in many of these patients, better understanding of its epidemiology, disease mechanisms, effectiveness of novel therapies such as biologics are still highly needed. Asthma treatment guidelines are largely informed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta analyses of RCTs, however inclusion criteria of many efficacy RCTs of asthma treatments often exclude a high number of patients with asthma in the community. Data from real-life studies and registries of severe asthma can complement efficacy studies by not only providing evidence on how a treatment performs in everyday clinical practice, post marketing safety information, data to support subsequent clinical trial design, but also helping to delineate the natural history of a disease and supporting important translational research endeavors. In the current review, we summarise available national and international collaborative studies and registries, the variables studies and the novel data and insights they provide. The key source of information for most asthma registries are real-life data from patient's electronic health records. Advent of digital technology in collecting data and their analysis is obvious and we draw attention to generation of new knowledge from registries of severe asthma to improve current diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines and asthma control.

[Diagnosis and treatment of asthma: a guideline for respiratory specialists 2023 - published by the German Respiratory Society (DGP) e. V.]

The management of asthma has fundamentally changed during the past decades. The present guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma was developed for respiratory specialists who need detailed and evidence-based information on the new diagnostic and therapeutic options in asthma. The guideline shows the new role of biomarkers, especially blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO), in diagnostic algorithms of asthma. Of note, this guideline is the first worldwide to announce symptom prevention and asthma remission as the ultimate goals of asthma treatment, which can be achieved by using individually tailored, disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs such as inhaled steroids, allergen immunotherapy or biologics. In addition, the central role of the treatment of comorbidities is emphasized. Finally, the document addresses several challenges in asthma management, including asthma treatment during pregnancy, treatment of severe asthma or the diagnosis and treatment of work-related asthma.

Characterization and Factors Associated with Poor Asthma Control in Adults with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma

A study was conducted in 98 adult patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma (73.5% women, mean age 47.2 years) and followed prospectively for 1 year. The aim of the study was to characterize this population and to identify factors associated with poor prognosis at 1 year of follow-up. At the initial visit, uncontrolled severe asthma was diagnosed in 87.7% of patients. Allergic sensitization was observed in 81.7% (polysensitization in 17.3%), with clinically significant allergic asthma in 45%. The mean percentage of sputum eosinophils was 4.7% (standard deviation(SD) 6.3%) and the mean (SD) blood eosinophil count 467 (225) cells/µL. Almost half of the patients (48.3%) had sputum eosinophilia (>3% eosinophils). Sputum eosinophils correlated significantly with peripheral eosinophilia (p = 0.004) and, to a lesser extent, with fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (p = 0.04). After 1 year, 48 patients (49%) had uncontrolled asthma in all visits, and 50 (51%) had controlled asthma in some visits. Airway obstruction (FEV₁ < 80% predicted) was the main reason for uncontrolled asthma. In the multivariate analysis, an obstructive pattern (odds ratio (OR) 7.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.41-23.03, p < 0.0001) and the patient's age (OR 1.045, 95% CI 1.005-1.086, p = 0.026) were independent predictors of poor asthma control. In adult-onset and long-standing asthma, serum interleukin (IL) IL-17 was higher in the uncontrolled asthma group. This study contributes to characterizing patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in real-world clinical practice.

Changes after 12 years of follow-up severe asthma patients cohort: higher obstruction and comorbidities, but significant better quality of life

BACKGROUND

The Brazilian Cohort of Asthma São Paulo (BRASASP) had a well-characterized severe asthmatic in Brazil, with 12 years of follow-up under standard treatment.

METHODS

Sequential assessment of patients with uncontrolled asthma from BRASASP cohort was carried out with 12 years of follow-up, performing exams and comparing with previous measurements.

RESULTS

50 from the 60 initial patients were reevaluated. Twelve years later, FEV1 and the FEV1/FVC ratio have significantly decreased, with a rate of loss of lung function of 11.8 and 14%, respectively, and worsening in small airway parameters such as RV/TLC. BMI, The Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores haven't changed. However, exacerbations decreased by 56%. Mean daily inhaled corticosteroid use was similar over time, but daily oral corticosteroid use decreased, in addition to a significant reduction in induced sputum eosinophilic and neutrophilic profile and serum IgE. Rhinitis, sinusitis, and GERD were the main comorbidities. In quality of life according to respiratory questionnaire SGRQ, total score showed a huge improvement (62% of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant decrease in FEV1 and FEV1/FVC. Data of pulmonary functional small airway characteristics show globally affected airways. Although higher doses of medications, patients were still uncontrolled, but with reduction of exacerbations, daily use of oral corticosteroid, less eosinophils and neutrophils in induced sputum and lower levels of IgE. Improvement in quality of life in 62% of patients.

The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) Control Level Predicts Future Risk of Asthma Exacerbations

BACKGROUND

The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) is a 10-item, equally weighted, yes/no control tool validated in patients with asthma aged 12 years and older.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate AIRQ's ability to predict patient-reported exacerbations over 12 months.

METHODS

Patients completed a baseline AIRQ during an in-person enrollment visit and reported exacerbations (ie, asthma-related courses of oral corticosteroids, emergency department/urgent care visits, and hospitalizations) via monthly online surveys. Logistic regressions were performed using AIRQ control level (well-controlled [WC], not well-controlled [NWC], very poorly controlled [VPC]), age, sex, race, and body mass index as covariates and 1 or more and 2 or more exacerbations as the dependent variables (adjusted odds ratios [OR] and 95% Wald CIs). Kaplan-Meier analyses of time to first exacerbation by AIRQ control level were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,112 patients were enrolled; 1,070 completed 1 or more surveys over 12 months (mean ± SD 10.5 ± 2.8 months); 70.5% female; age 43.9 ± 19.3 years; 20.4% non-White; body mass index 30.6 ± 8.7 kg/m²; AIRQ: WC 35.2%, NWC 38.1%, VPC 26.6%. A total of 45.7% of patients reported 1 or more exacerbations and 26.7% 2 or more exacerbations (WC 28.4% ≥ 1, 11.1% ≥ 2; NWC 46.3% ≥ 1, 27.9% ≥ 2; VPC 67.7% ≥ 1, 45.6% ≥ 2). The ORs for 1 or more exacerbations NWC versus WC were 2.1 (CI 1.6-2.9), and VPC versus WC were 4.6 (CI 3.3-6.5). The ORs for 2 or more exacerbations NWC versus WC were 3.1 (CI 2.1-4.6), and VPC versus WC were 6.1 (CI 4.0-9.1). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated clear differentiation of time to first exacerbation by AIRQ control level (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The AIRQ control level predicts exacerbation risk over 12 months and probability of time to first exacerbation.

The Italian severe/uncontrolled asthma registry (RItA): A 12-month clinical follow-up

BACKGROUND

follow-up studies on registries of severe/uncontrolled asthma (SUA) patients are scanty.

OBJECTIVE

to analyze baseline and follow-up characteristics of SUA patients and their longitudinal patterns.

METHODS

180 adult patients (age ≥15 yrs) were investigated at baseline and 12-month follow-up through the Italian SUA registry (RItA). Latent transition analysis (LTA) was performed to detect cross-sectional SUA phenotypes and longitudinal patterns. Risk factors for longitudinal patterns were assessed through logistic regression.

RESULTS

a significant/borderline improvement of asthma control outcomes in the last 2-4 weeks emerged at follow-up with respect to baseline for: daily activities limitations (Δ -16%), frequent diurnal symptoms (Δ -25%), uncontrolled asthma symptoms according to ACT (Δ -26%). Last 12-month use of oral corticosteroids was less frequent at follow-up than at baseline (Δ -25%). Health status improvement was confirmed by lung function test results. Through LTA, two longitudinal patterns were detected considering last 12-month control outcomes: "persistence/worsening" (53.9%), "under control/improvement" (46.1%). A lower likelihood of having "persistence/worsening" SUA was exhibited by patients under anti-IgE (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.84) and inhaled corticosteroids-bronchodilator association treatment (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01-1.26, borderline value), while a higher likelihood was shown by older age at first asthma diagnosis (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07).

CONCLUSION

the implementation of a SUA registry, the availability of patient-level data and the application of an innovative longitudinal analysis allowed to observe a general improvement in asthma control, one year after baseline, and a lower risk of SUA "persistence/worsening" in patients under anti-IgE and regular ICS-bronchodilator association use.

Is mild asthma truly mild? The patients' real-life setting

OBJECTIVES

Asthma exacerbations and, more rarely, fatal asthma attacks have been reported in mild asthma patients, suggesting poor disease control and awareness of its potential burden. Our study aimed to explore outside the hospital/specialist setting the perspective and disease treatment behavior of patients self-reporting a mild asthma diagnosis.

METHODS

Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) technique was used to investigate the identified study population. Questions about diagnosis, symptoms, comorbidities, treatment strategy, ongoing assessments, and quality of life were administered.

RESULTS

Overall, 258 patients were considered for the analysis. As the most relevant results, 22% of them reported severe respiratory symptoms, 52% experienced at least one exacerbation/year, and 7% needed Emergency Room care. Sixty-six percent of the respondents assumed as needing short-acting bronchodilators only. Of note, 22% of patients were using oral steroids (OCS) intermittently and 72% of them considered their quality of life unsatisfying.

CONCLUSION

Outside the hospital/specialist setting, mild asthma burden is still not negligible and the treatment approach is not correct. In particular, the reported OCS use is disproportionate. Our data suggest that mild asthma, especially when self-assessed might be other than mild, suggesting that efforts to increase disease awareness, improve the disease control limiting the OCS abuse are required.

Perceptions on Home-Administration of Biologics in the Context of Severe Asthma: An International Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Biologics are an effective therapy for severe asthma. Home administration of biologics by patients is likely to facilitate their accessibility. Yet little is known about patients' and health care providers' (HCPs) perceptions regarding home administration of biologics.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to create more insight into the perceptions and experiences of patients and HCPs regarding home administration of biologics in the context of the treatment of severe asthma.

METHODS

A qualitative international study was performed in the Netherlands, United States, Australia, and United Kingdom. In each country, 2 focus groups were held with potential/recent and long-term users of biologics at home. Prior to the focus groups, patients were prompted with themes on online forums. For triangulation purposes, interviews were held with HCPs to discuss salient findings from forums and focus groups. Data were analyzed with qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 75 patients participated in the forums, of which 40 participated in the focus groups. Furthermore, 12 HCPs were interviewed. The following overarching themes were identified: living with severe asthma; practical aspects of using biologics; the role of HCPs regarding biologics; social support from family, friends, and others; effectiveness of biologics and other treatments; side effects of biologics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that, for those using biologics for severe asthma, the benefits of home administration of biologics usually outweigh inconvenience and side effects. Guided practice, accessible support contact, and monitoring including social support should be central in the transition from hospital to home administration of asthma biologics.

Sex differences in the relationship of sleep-disordered breathing and asthma control among children with severe asthma

OBJECTIVE

Children with severe asthma are underrepresented in studies of the relationship of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and asthma and little is known about sex differences of these relationships. We sought to determine the relationship of SDB with asthma control and lung function among boys and girls within a pediatric severe asthma cohort.

METHODS

Patients attending clinic visits at the Boston Children's Hospital Pediatric Severe Asthma Program completed the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Spirometry. The prevalence of SDB was defined as a PSQ score >0.33. We analyzed the association between PSQ score and both ACT score and spirometry values in mixed effect models, testing interactions for age and sex.

RESULTS

Among 37 subjects, mean age was 11.8 years (4.4) and 23 (62.2%) were male, the prevalence of SDB was 43.2% (16/37). Including all 80 observations, there was a moderate negative correlation between PSQ and ACT scores (r=-0.46, p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression models revealed a significant sex interaction with PSQ on asthma control (p = 0.003), such that for each 0.10 point increase in PSQ there was a 1.88 point decrease in ACT score for females but only 0.21 point decrease in ACT score for males. A positive PSQ screen was associated with a 9.44 point (CI 5.54, 13.34, p < 0.001) lower ACT score for females and a 3.22 point (CI 0.56, 5.88, p = 0.02) lower score for males.

CONCLUSIONS

SDB is common among children with severe asthma. Among children with severe asthma, SDB in girls portends to significantly worse asthma control than boys.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2021.1897838.

Association of mold levels in urban children's homes with difficult-to-control asthma

BACKGROUND

Mold sensitization and exposure are associated with asthma severity, but the specific species that contribute to difficult-to-control (DTC) asthma are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the association between overall and specific mold levels in the homes of urban children and DTC asthma.

METHODS

The Asthma Phenotypes in the Inner-City study recruited participants, aged 6 to 17 years, from 8 US cities and classified each participant as having either DTC asthma or easy-to-control (ETC) asthma on the basis of treatment step level. Dust samples had been collected in each participant's home (n = 485), and any dust remaining (n = 265 samples), after other analyses, was frozen at -20^oC. The dust samples (n = 265) were analyzed using quantitative PCR to determine the concentrations of the 36 molds in the Environmental Relative Moldiness Index. Logistic regression was performed to discriminate specific mold content of dust from homes of children with DTC versus ETC asthma.

RESULTS

Frozen-dust samples were available from 54% of homes of children with DTC (139 of 253) and ETC asthma (126 of 232). Only the average concentration of the mold Mucor was significantly (P < .001) greater in homes of children with DTC asthma. In homes with window air-conditioning units, the Mucor concentration contributed about a 22% increase (1.6 odds ratio; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2) in the ability to discriminate between cases of DTC and ETC asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucor levels in the homes of urban youth were a predictor of DTC asthma, and these higher Mucor levels were more likely in homes with a window air-conditioner.

Participation in scheduled asthma follow-up contacts and adherence to treatment during 12-year follow-up in patients with adult-onset asthma

Background

Poor treatment compliance is a common problem in the treatment of asthma. To our knowledge, no previous long-term follow-up studies exist on how scheduled asthma follow-up contacts occur in primary health care (PHC) versus secondary care and how these contacts relate to adherence to medication and in participation to further scheduled asthma contacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate occurrence of scheduled asthma contacts and treatment compliance in PHC versus secondary care, and to identify the factors associated with non-participation to scheduled contacts.

Methods

Patients with new adult-onset asthma (n = 203) were followed for 12 years in a real-life asthma cohort of the Seinäjoki Adult Asthma Study (SAAS). The first contacts were mainly carried out in secondary care and therefore the actual follow-up time including PHC visits was 10 years.

Results

A majority (71%) of the patients had ≥ 2 scheduled asthma contacts during 10-year follow-up and most of them (79%) mainly in PHC. Patients with follow-up contacts mainly in PHC had better adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) medication during the whole 12-year period compared to patients in secondary care. In the study population, 29% of the patients had only 0–1 scheduled asthma contacts during the follow-up. Heavy alcohol consumption predicted poor participation in scheduled contacts.

Conclusions

Patients with mainly PHC scheduled asthma contacts were more adherent to ICS medication than patients in the secondary care. Based on our results it is necessary to pay more attention to actualization of asthma follow-up visits and systematic assessment of asthma patients including evaluation of alcohol consumption.

Trial registration Seinäjoki Adult Asthma Study is retrospectively registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier number NCT02733016. Registered 11 April 2016.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-01850-1.

Difficult-to-Treat Asthma Management in School-Age Children

The World Health Organization divides severe asthma into three categories: untreated severe asthma; difficult-to-treat severe asthma; and severe, therapy-resistant asthma. The apparent frequency of severe asthma in the general population of asthmatic children is probably around 5%. Upon referral of these children, it is important to evaluate the diagnosis of asthma carefully before modifying management and applying a long-term monitoring plan. Identification of pathophysiologic phenotypes using objective biomarkers is essential in our routine assessments of severe asthma. Although conventional pharmacologic approaches should be attempted first, there is growing recognition that children with difficult-to-treat asthma may have unique clinical phenotypes that may necessitate alternative treatment approaches including asthma biologics. These new medications, especially those with effects on multiple pathologic features of asthma, raise the hope that new treatment strategies could induce remission. Besides introducing new medications, the opportunity for closer monitoring is feasible with advances in digital health. Therefore, we have the opportunity to improve response to medications, individualize treatment, and monitor response along with potential steps to prevent severe asthma.

Blood eosinophil counts in the general population and airways disease: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical context for using blood eosinophil (EOS) counts as treatment-response biomarkers in asthma and COPD requires better understanding of EOS distributions and ranges. We describe EOS distributions and ranges published in asthma, COPD, control (non-asthma/COPD) and general populations.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies (January 2008 to November 2018) that included EOS counts in asthma, severe asthma, COPD, control and general populations. Excluded studies had total sample sizes <200, EOS as inclusion criterion, hospitalised population only and exclusively paediatric participants.

RESULTS

Overall, 91 eligible studies were identified, most had total-population-level data available: asthma (39 studies), severe asthma (12 studies), COPD (23 studies), control (seven studies) and general populations (14 studies); some articles reported data for multiple populations. Reported EOS distributions were right-skewed (seven studies). Reported median EOS counts ranged from 157-280 cells·µL-1 (asthma, 22 studies); 200-400 cells·µL-1 (severe asthma, eight studies); 150-183 cells·µL-1 (COPD, six studies); and 100-160 cells·µL-1 (controls, three studies); and 100-200 cells·µL-1 (general populations, six studies). The meta-analysis showed that observed variability was mostly between studies rather than within studies. Factors reportedly associated with higher blood EOS counts included current smoking, positive skin-prick test, elevated total IgE, comorbid allergic rhinitis, age ≤18 years, male sex, spirometric asthma/COPD diagnosis, metabolic syndrome and adiposity.

CONCLUSION

EOS distribution and range varied by study population, and were affected by clinical factors including age, smoking history and comorbidities, which, regardless of severity, should be considered during treatment decision-making.

Association Between a Type 2 Inflammatory Disease Burden Score and Outcomes Among Patients with Asthma

Background

Although prevalence of co-existing type 2 inflammatory diseases (cT2) in asthma patients has been reported, limited data exist regarding their impact on asthma outcomes.

Objective

To assess the impact of cT2 burden on asthma outcomes and to evaluate patterns of clustering of cT2 in a real-world setting.

Methods

From medical records of 4.5 million enrollees in 650 primary care practices in the UK (January 2010–December 2017), patients with ≥1 diagnosis code for asthma at any time pre-index date (date of most recent asthma-related medical encounter) and ≥2 asthma-related prescriptions during the year before index date were categorized into the Global Initiative of Asthma (GINA) guideline severity steps. A cT2 burden score (range 0–9) was assigned based on the total number of co-existing conditions (allergic conjunctivitis, allergic rhinitis, anaphylaxis, eczema/atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, food allergy, nasal polyps, or urticaria) for which patients received a medical diagnosis. Multivariate regression models evaluated associations between cT2 burden score and asthma exacerbations and asthma control. Factor analysis was performed to assess which cT2 comorbidities were correlated and exhibited patterns of clustering.

Results

Overall, 245,893 patients with asthma were included (mean [SD] age 44.8 [22.1] years; 43.8% male). Between 55% (GINA step 1) and 60% (GINA step 5) of asthma patients had a medical diagnosis for ≥1 other type2dx. Patients with increased cT2 burden were significantly more likely to experience asthma exacerbations and less likely to achieve asthma control.

Conclusion

Asthma patients with a higher cumulative cT2 burden score were more likely to experience worse asthma outcomes than those without any cT2 (burden score of 0).

Use of Systemic Corticosteroids for Reasons Other than Asthma in Subjects with Asthma

BACKGROUNDS

Recent studies have reported increased risks of adverse events from systemic corticosteroids even with only low-dose or short-term use. Some patients with asthma experience complications requiring systemic corticosteroids. However, few studies have examined issues associated with administration of systemic corticosteroids for reasons other than asthma among subjects with asthma.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated patterns of systemic corticosteroid exposure for reasons other than asthma in subjects with asthma.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed the records of adult subjects with asthma followed up for >1 year at Yokohama City University Hospital from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. We investigated patterns and reasons for systemic corticosteroid use during follow-up. In addition, factors related to systemic corticosteroid use for reasons likely other than asthma were investigated.

RESULTS

Among the 568 subjects with asthma analyzed, 326 (57.4%) had received systemic corticosteroids for some reason. Among those 326 patients, 120 (36.8%) had received systemic corticosteroids for reasons likely other than asthma. Multivariable analysis revealed rheumatoid arthritis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, other collagen vascular diseases, chronic rhinosinusitis, and malignancy as positively associated with systemic corticosteroid exposure for reasons likely other than asthma in subjects with asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

About 40% of systemic corticosteroid use in subjects with asthma was for reasons likely other than asthma. Clinicians should be aware of their asthma patients' exposures to systemic corticosteroids for nonasthma reasons, to avoid missing adverse events or underestimating the severity of asthma, and to reduce systemic corticosteroid use.

Current practice patterns, challenges, and educational needs of asthma care providers in the United States

OBJECTIVE

For severe, uncontrolled asthma (SUA), a gap exists between recent scientific advances and their incorporation into clinical practice. Using a Knowledge-to-Action Framework, new knowledge can be translated into evidence-based interventions to improve outcomes. The AstraZeneca U.S. PRECISION initiative aims to apply this Framework to improve recognition and management of SUA. The study objective was to identify factors contributing to gaps in care for patients with SUA. Results from a needs assessment survey of U.S. pulmonologists and allergists/immunologists were assessed within the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to advance bench-to-bedside care.

METHODS

Pulmonologists and allergists/immunologists from across the United States were invited to complete a customized, quantitative severe asthma survey in person at the 2017 American Thoracic Society annual meeting or via the Internet. Responses were summarized descriptively, and chi-squared tests evaluated associations between variables of interest.

RESULTS

Overall, 140 U.S. providers responded, most of whom were pulmonologists (84%). Most (60%) practiced in a community-based setting; 40% practiced at an academic medical center. Key challenges to providing care for patients with severe asthma included insurance company requirements and identification of the pathophysiology of an individual patient's severe asthma. Traditional measures of asthma-related morbidity were ranked as highly important by significantly more respondents compared with assessment of biomarkers (p < 0.0001). Respondents generally valued online virtual self-education.

CONCLUSIONS

Survey results identified unmet needs for the identification and management of patients with SUA and opportunities to improve patient outcomes through evidence-based management of SUA, including testing for biologic eligibility and subsequent use of biologic therapies.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Productivity Among US Patients with Severe Asthma

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and productivity of patients with confirmed severe asthma (SA) have not been well characterized in large, real-world populations.

Purpose

To characterize SA impact on HRQoL, work productivity, and activity impairment in a large, real-world cohort in the United States (US).

Methods

CHRONICLE is an observational study of specialist-treated adults (≥18 years) in the US with SA receiving biologics or maintenance systemic corticosteroids (mSCS), or those persistently uncontrolled by high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers (HD ICS+). At enrollment, patients completed the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. Results were analyzed for those enrolled between February 2018 and February 2020.

Results

Among patients who completed enrollment questionnaires (n = 1109), mean age was 54 years and most were women (70%). Among SGRQ respondents (n = 960), mean (SD) total score was 43 (23); 51% reported good/very good health. Among WPAI respondents (n = 1057; 566 employed), mean (SD) overall work impairment was 21% (25). Patients receiving biologics (vs mSCS, HD ICS+ only) had better SGRQ total scores (38 vs 59, 48) and lower work impairment (17% vs 34%, 27%). Patients with better SGRQ activity scores relative to symptom scores had better SGRQ impacts scores, total scores, and reported better overall health.

Conclusion

SA significantly affects HRQoL, work productivity, and activity. The SGRQ is a valuable research instrument for evaluating HRQoL in SA. Due to its association with HRQoL and overall health, activity impairment should be a focus when monitoring patients’ disease control.

Study Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03373045.

Physician-Patient Concordance in the Assessment of Asthma Control

BACKGROUND

Discordance between physicians' and patients' perceptions of asthma control may negatively impact symptom control, treatment, and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate concordance between physicians' and patients' perceptions of overall asthma control and the association between perceived overall control and individual components of control.

METHODS

U.S. survey data (Dec 2015-Feb 2016; Apr-Aug 2018) from the Respiratory Disease Specific Programme were analyzed. Physicians recorded patient disease characteristics and their perception of patients' asthma control. Patients' perception of control was assessed using the Asthma Control Test; responses were compared with level of symptom control per the Global Initiative for Asthma criteria and Work Productivity and Impairment questionnaire responses. Agreement and association were assessed by weighted kappa (κ) and Spearman rho (ρ), respectively.

RESULTS

The study included 1,288 patients. Concordance between physician-perceived and patient-perceived asthma control in the prior 4 weeks was moderate (κ = 0.4951). Association between physicians' overall perception of asthma control and patients' overall Asthma Control Test score was also moderate (ρ = 0.5450). However, 61.5% of patients with self-reported, well-controlled asthma had shortness of breath 1 to 2 times/wk, 45.6% had 1 to 2 night-time awakenings/wk, and patients reported a mean (SD) daily activity impairment of 17.5% (16.2%). Only 21.8% of patients with self-reported, well-controlled asthma were classified as such by Global Initiative for Asthma symptom criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' self-assessment of overall control does not accurately characterize the true level of control; thus, patients and physicians may benefit from working together to assess the individual components of asthma control to achieve better disease management, treatment decisions, and improved outcomes.

Early responders within seven days of dupilumab treatment for severe asthma evaluated by patient-reported outcome: a pilot study

Background

The management of severe asthma-associated symptoms is essential since they are distressing to the affected patients, and also greatly impair their quality of life. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody, blocks interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling, both of which are crucial in acquired and innate immunity pathways through fast signal transduction, leading to an early response to treatment. Although rapid improvement within 1–3 days after dupilumab treatment was observed in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, an early response within 7 days of dupilumab treatment in severe asthma has not been reported.

Methods

Twelve consecutive patients with severe asthma who were newly treated with dupilumab between July 2019 and April 2020 were retrospectively investigated. We evaluated the early response (within 7 days) of patients with severe asthma receiving dupilumab therapy. Asthma control test (ACT) and the daily ACT, which was modified from the ACT to evaluate daily symptoms associated with asthma, were adopted as patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at week 8 and within 7 days, respectively. Patients were stratified into early responders (7 days), late responders (week 8), and non-responders without significant improvement in PROs. Descriptive statistics were adopted due to the limited number of patients.

Results

Four of these 12 patients were early responders, with the following baseline characteristics: body mass index, <25 kg/m²; without depression; baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second, <1.50 L; and more than one exacerbation in 1 year. On the other hand, five were late responders, and 44.4% of the nine responders were early responders. The higher the eosinophilic count and/or FeNO did not show any relationship between the early responder and nonresponder.

Conclusions

The effect of dupilumab on severe asthma in patients with atopic features could be started earlier than 2 weeks, similar to atopic dermatitis. Daily ACT may be useful in monitoring the early efficacy of dupilumab in treating severe asthma.

Impact of asthma severity as risk factor to future exacerbations in patients admitted for asthma exacerbation

Background

To investigate the impact of disease severity on exacerbation patterns and identify its potential as a risk factor for future exacerbations in patients admitted for asthma exacerbations.

Methods

We analyzed frequency and time to next exacerbation over a period of three years in 532 patients admitted for exacerbation. Disease severity was selected as a potential risk factor for the events. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to identify the probability of future exacerbations. A Cox-proportional hazards model was used to assess independent relative risks.

Results

Out of 532 patients analyzed, the frequency of exacerbations rose as the severity of the asthma increased. The exacerbation rates in the following year were 1.66 per person for patients with mild asthma and 3.98 for patients with severe asthma. The median time to the next exacerbation in patients with mild asthma was 61.4 weeks (95% CI, 40.1-82.6) compared to 15.0 weeks (95% CI, 11.3-18.6) in patients with severe asthma (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that asthma severity (severe vs mild asthma, HR=1.42, 95% CI, 1.07-1.89), a history of 1-2 exacerbations (HR=1.95, 95% CI, 1.45-2.63) or > 2 exacerbations (HR=2.32, 95% CI, 1.56-3.44) in the previous 12 months, and a high number of comorbidities (≥5 vs none, HR=2.5, 95% CI, 1.41-4.45) were independent predictors of the probability of future exacerbations.

Conclusion

Asthma severity is a strong independent risk factor for future exacerbations, and exacerbation rates also become more frequent as the severity of the asthma increases. These findings help in better understanding of the natural course of exacerbations across the spectrum of asthma disease severity.

Clinical profile of chronic bronchial asthma patients in Poland: results of the PROKSAL study

Introduction

Asthma is a complex condition characterized by the presence of chronic inflammation in the lower respiratory tract resulting in many disturbing symptoms. The study of the clinical profile of the population with asthma allows us to understand a trend of a specific disease taking into account several indicators and its clinical characteristics.

Aim

Evaluation of the clinical profile of patients with chronic bronchial asthma in Poland.

Material and methods

The study included 10400 adult patients, of both sexes, diagnosed with chronic bronchial asthma who started therapy based on inhaled glucocorticosteroids accompanied by salmeterol, and 52 allergists. The examination was performed in a doctor's surgery. Standardized questionnaire interviews were used in order to carry out the procedure.

Results

The age of the patients ranged from 18 up to 97 years. Most of them suffer from overweight and obesity. 45.3% of the patients smoked cigarettes or declared to be passive smokers. Current asthma control was poor: over 56% of the patients suffered from diurnal symptoms more often than twice a week, almost 55% from nocturnal symptoms, in 72% of the patients' physical activity was limited, whereas 57% required immediate treatment. Most commonly used drugs were inhaled glucocorticosteroids and short acting β2-mimetics. After treatment change, fewer patients suffered from asthma symptoms.

Conclusions

Adjusting the therapy according to the current guidelines and to the patient's needs helps to improve asthma control.

Group-randomized trial of tailored brief shared decision-making to improve asthma control in urban black adults

AIMS

To assess the intervention effects of BREATHE (BRief intervention to Evaluate Asthma THErapy), a novel brief shared decision-making intervention and evaluate feasibility and acceptability of intervention procedures.

DESIGN

Group-randomized longitudinal pilot study.

METHODS

In total, 80 adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma participated in a trial comparing BREATHE (N = 40) to a dose-matched attention control intervention (N = 40). BREATHE is a one-time shared decision-making intervention delivered by clinicians during routine office visits. Ten clinicians were randomized and trained on BREATHE or the control condition. Participants were followed monthly for 3 months post-intervention. Data were collected from December 2017 - May 2019 and included surveys, lung function tests, and interviews.

RESULTS

Participants were Black/multiracial (100%) mostly female (83%) adults (mean age 45). BREATHE clinicians delivered BREATHE to all 40 participants with fidelity based on expert review of audiorecordings. While the control group reported improvements in asthma control at 1-month and 3-month follow-up, only BREATHE participants had better asthma control at each timepoint (β = 0.77; standard error (SE)[0.17]; p ≤ 0.0001; β = 0.71; SE[0.16]; p ≤ 0.0001; β = 0.54; SE[0.15]; p = .0004), exceeding the minimally important difference. BREATHE participants also perceived greater shared decision-making occurred during the intervention visit (β = 7.39; SE[3.51]; p = .03) and fewer symptoms at follow-up (e.g., fewer nights woken, less shortness of breath and less severity of symptoms) than the controls. Both groups reported improved adherence and fewer erroneous medication beliefs.

CONCLUSION

BREATHE is a promising brief tailored intervention that can be integrated into office visits using clinicians as interventionists. Thus, BREATHE offers a pragmatic approach to improving asthma outcomes and shared decision-making in a health disparity population.

IMPACT

The study addressed the important problem of uncontrolled asthma in a high-risk vulnerable population. Compared with the dose-matched attention control condition, participants receiving the novel brief tailored shared decision-making intervention had significant improvements in asthma outcomes and greater perceived engagement in shared decision-making. Brief interventions integrated into office visits and delivered by clinicians may offer a pragmatic approach to narrowing health disparity gaps. Future studies where other team members (e.g., office nurses, social workers) are trained in shared decision-making may address important implementation science challenges as it relates to adoption, maintenance, and dissemination. TRAIL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03300752.

International severe asthma registry (ISAR): protocol for a global registry

Background

Severe asthma exerts a disproportionately heavy burden on patients and health care. Due to the heterogeneity of the severe asthma population, many patients need to be evaluated to understand the clinical features and outcomes of severe asthma in order to facilitate personalised and targeted care. The International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) is a multi-country registry project initiated to aid in this endeavour.

Methods

ISAR is a multi-disciplinary initiative benefitting from the combined experience of the ISAR Steering Committee (ISC; comprising 47 clinicians and researchers across 29 countries, who have a special interest and/or experience in severe asthma management or establishment and maintenance of severe asthma registries) in collaboration with scientists and experts in database management and communication. Patients (≥18 years old) receiving treatment according to the 2018 definitions of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Step 5 or uncontrolled on GINA Step 4 treatment will be included. Data will be collected on a core set of 95 variables identified using the Delphi method. Participating registries will agree to provide access to and share standardised anonymous patient-level data with ISAR. ISAR is a registered data source on the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance. ISAR’s collaborators include Optimum Patient Care, the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG) and AstraZeneca. ISAR is overseen by the ISC, REG, the Anonymised Data Ethics & Protocol Transparency Committee and the ISAR operational committee, ensuring the conduct of ethical, clinically relevant research that brings value to all key stakeholders.

Conclusions

ISAR aims to offer a rich source of real-life data for scientific research to understand and improve disease burden, treatment patterns and patient outcomes in severe asthma. Furthermore, the registry will provide an international platform for research collaboration in respiratory medicine, with the overarching aim of improving primary and secondary care of adults with severe asthma globally.

Leonurus sibiricus root extracts decrease airway remodeling markers expression in fibroblasts

Bronchial asthma is believed to be provoked by the interaction between airway inflammation and remodeling. Airway remodeling is a complex and poorly understood process, and controlling it appears key for halting the progression of asthma and other obstructive lung diseases. Plants synthesize a number of valuable compounds as constitutive products and as secondary metabolites, many of which have curative properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-remodeling properties of extracts from transformed and transgenic Leonurus sibiricus roots with transformed L. sibiricus roots extract with transcriptional factor AtPAP1 overexpression (AtPAP1). Two fibroblast cell lines, Wistar Institute-38 (WI-38) and human fetal lung fibroblast (HFL1), were incubated with extracts from transformed L. sibiricus roots (TR) and roots with transcriptional factor AtPAP1 over-expression (AtPAP1 TR). Additionally, remodeling conditions were induced in the cultures with rhinovirus 16 (HRV16). The expressions of metalloproteinase 9 (MMP)-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), arginase I and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and immunoblotting methods. AtPAP1 TR decreased arginase I and MMP-9 expression with no effect on TIMP-1 or TGF-β mRNA expression. This extract also inhibited HRV16-induced expression of arginase I, MMP-9 and TGF-β in both cell lines (P < 0·05) Our study shows for the first time to our knowledge, that transformed AtPAP1 TR extract from L. sibiricus root may affect the remodeling process. Its effect can be attributed an increased amount of phenolic acids such as: chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid or ferulic acid and demonstrates the value of biotechnology in medicinal research.

The CHRONICLE Study of US Adults with Subspecialist-Treated Severe Asthma: Objectives, Design, and Initial Results

BACKGROUND

Approximately 5-10% of patients with asthma have severe disease. High-quality real-world studies are needed to identify areas for improved management.

OBJECTIVE

Aligned with the International Severe Asthma Registry, the CHRONICLE study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03373045) was developed to address this need in the US.

STUDY DESIGN

Learnings from prior studies were applied to develop a real-world, prospective, noninterventional study of US patients with confirmed severe asthma who are treated by subspecialist physicians and require biologic or maintenance systemic immunosuppressant therapy or who are uncontrolled by high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and additional controllers. Target enrollment is 4000 patients, with patient observation for ≥3 years. A geographically diverse sample of allergist/immunologist and pulmonologist sites approach all eligible patients under their care and report patient characteristics, treatment, and health outcomes every 6 months. Patients complete online surveys every 1-6 months.

INITIAL RESULTS

From February 2018 to February 2019, 102 sites screened 1428 eligible patients; 936 patients enrolled. Study sites (40% allergist/immunologist, 42% pulmonologist, 18% both) were similar to other US asthma subspecialist samples. Enrolled patients were 67% female with median ages at enrollment and diagnosis of 55 (range: 18-89) and 26 (0-80) years, respectively. Median body mass index was 31 kg/m2; 3% and 29% were current or former smokers, respectively, and >60% reported ≥1 exacerbation in the prior year and suboptimal symptom control.

CONCLUSION

CHRONICLE will provide high-quality provider- and patient-reported data from a large, real-world cohort of US adults with subspecialist-treated severe asthma.

Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and Asthma: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Objective

The relationship between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and asthma is controversial. The goal of this study was to determine the association between PPI use in non-asthma subjects and their subsequent asthma prevalence.

Design

Nationwide, population-based cohort study.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan from 1999 to 2013. We identified 24,077 adult patients with PPI use for more than 3 months and 24,077 controls matched by propensity score on a one-to-one ratio for age, gender, comorbidities (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, peptic ulcer disease, diabetes, and sleep apnea syndrome), and medications (histamine 2 receptor antagonists [H2RA], nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], and acetaminophen). The cumulative asthma incidence for the two cohorts in the follow-up period was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was examined using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (HR).

Results

The overall incidence of asthma was 1.58-fold greater in the PPI cohort than in the non-PPI cohort (13.3 versus 8.4 per 1,000 person-years), with an adjusted HR of 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-1.88). In patients without previous peptic ulcer disease, the adjusted HR of asthma associated with PPIs was higher than in the non-PPI group (1.95; 95% CI, 1.80-2.11). The risk of asthma due to PPI use was also more significant in patients not receiving H2RA (1.81; 95% CI, 1.66-1.96), NSAIDs (1.93; 95% CI, 1.73-2.15), and acetaminophen (1.88; 95% CI, 1.70-2.08).

Conclusions

This population base study demonstrated that patients with long-duration of PPI use are at a higher risk of developing asthma, regardless of age, gender, comorbidities, and medications.

Systematic Literature Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Use for Asthma Management

Systemic corticosteroid use to manage uncontrolled asthma and its associated healthcare burden may account for important health-related adverse effects. We conducted a systematic literature review to investigate the real-world extent and burden of systemic corticosteroid use in asthma. We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify English-language articles published in 2010–2017, using search terms for asthma with keywords for oral corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids. Observational studies, prescription database analyses, economic analyses, and surveys on oral/systemic corticosteroid use in children (>5 yr old), adolescents (12–17 yr old), and adults with asthma were included. We identified and reviewed 387 full-text articles, and our review included data from 139 studies. The included studies were conducted in Europe, North America, and Asia. Overall, oral/systemic corticosteroids were commonly used for asthma management and were more frequently used in patients with severe asthma than in those with milder disease. Long-term oral/systemic corticosteroid use was, in general, less frequent than short-term use. Compared with no use, long-term and repeated short-term oral/systemic corticosteroid use were associated with an increased risk of acute and chronic adverse events, even when doses were comparatively low. Greater oral/systemic corticosteroid exposure was also associated with increased costs and healthcare resource use. This review provides a comprehensive overview of oral/systemic corticosteroid use and associated adverse events for patients with all degrees of asthma severity and exposure duration. We report that oral/systemic corticosteroid use is prevalent in asthma management, and the risks of acute and chronic complications increase with the cumulative oral corticosteroid dosage.

Antagonistic Peptides That Specifically Bind to the First and Second Extracellular Loops of CCR5 and Anti-IL-23p19 Antibody Reduce Airway Inflammation by Suppressing the IL-23/Th17 Signaling Pathway

Asthma is a heterogeneous chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways with a complex etiology, which involves a variety of cells and cellular components. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the effects and mechanisms of antagonistic peptides that specifically bind to the first and second extracellular loops of CCR5 (GH and HY peptides, respectively) and anti-interleukin-23 subunit p19 (anti-IL-23p19) in the airway and thereby mediate inflammation and the IL-23/T helper 17 (Th17) cell pathway in asthmatic mice. An experimental asthma model using BALB/c mice was induced by ovalbumin (OVA) and treated with peptides that are antagonistic to CCR5 or with anti-IL-23p19. The extents of the asthmatic inflammation and mucus production were assessed. In addition, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected, the cells were counted, and the IL-4 level was detected by ELISA. The IL-23/Th17 pathway-related protein and mRNA levels in the lung tissues were measured, and the positive production rates of Th17 cells in the thymus, spleen, and peripheral blood were detected. The groups treated with one of the two peptides and/or anti-IL-23p19 showed significant reductions in allergic inflammation and mucus secretion; decreased expression levels of IL-23p19, IL-23R, IL-17A and lactoferrin (LTF); and reduced proportions of Th17 cells in the thymus, spleen, and peripheral blood. Specifically, among the four treatment groups, the anti-IL-23p19 with HY peptide group exhibited the lowest positive production rate of Th17 cells. Our data also showed a significant and positive correlation between CCR5 and IL-23p19 protein expression. These findings suggest that the administration of peptides antagonistic to CCR5 and/or anti-IL-23p19 can reduce airway inflammation in asthmatic mice, most likely through inhibition of the IL-23/Th17 signaling pathway, and the HY peptide can alleviate inflammation not only through the IL-23/Th17 pathway but also through other mechanisms that result in the regulation of inflammation.

"Severe-controlled" asthma 4 years later: is it still controlled?

BACKGROUND

Controlled severe asthma is based on needing regular medication and 4 markers of good asthma control. This study reevaluated a community sample defined 4 years earlier as "severe-controlled" based on electronic medical records of medications dispensed over 12 months.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the current extent of clinically-controlled asthma and asthma-related quality-of-life among patients previously considered "severe-controlled".

METHODS

69 patients considered "severe-controlled" 4 years earlier answered a questionnaire that included the asthma control test (ACT), demographics, education, comorbidities, medications, asthma-related healthcare utilization, atopy history, environmental exposures, and follow-up. Patients underwent spirometry, eosinophil count, total IgE, and skin-prick testing for airborne allergens.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven percent reported using combined inhalers (ICS + LABA) regularly. Only 4% visited the ER and none was hospitalized in the last year. Average predicted FEV₁ was 80%. Average ACT score was 19; 51% reported recurrent heartburn, 46% night awakenings and 70% recurrent rhinitis. Skin-prick testing was positive in 72%, average IgE was 376 IU/ml. Eosinophil counts were ≥300/ml in 42% and ≥400/ml in 25%. ACT < 20 was strongly related to recurrent heartburn. Formal education was related to ACT ≥ 20 (p = 0.045) and perception of good asthma control the previous month (p < 0.001). Eosinophil count, recurrent heartburn, total IgE, and recurrent rhinitis were interrelated.

CONCLUSIONS

Among severe asthmatics, good drug compliance, low use of relievers and low rates of exacerbations do not necessarily reflect asthma-related quality-of-life and optimal control. We urge physicians and HMOs to address asthma control in terms of quality-of-life based on validated questionnaires, and offer all patients asthma education; perhaps more to those with low formal education.

Severe asthma and eligibility for biologics in a Brazilian cohort

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the eligibility for biologic therapies for severe asthma (SA) in a cohort of patients attending the Program for Control of Asthma (ProAR) in Bahia, Brazil.

METHODS

Data from SA patients (≥18 years old) attending the ProAR, that were included in a case-control study conducted from 2013 to 2015, were used to reassess patients according to a modified ERS/ATS 2014 SA criteria. Patients were then classified according to the eligibility for SA biological therapy based on current prescription labels.

RESULTS

From 544 patients in the cohort, 531 (97.6%) were included and 172 (32.4%) were identified as SA patients according to the ERS/ATS 2014 modified criteria. Of these 172 patients, 69 (40.1%) were ineligible for any of the biologicals approved for asthma (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab), 60 (34.9%) patients were eligible for one of the biological therapies, and 10 (5.8%) patients were eligible for all biological therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of patients with SA were eligible for biologic therapy in our study, but none of them received this form of treatment. Almost half of them were not eligible to any of the approved biologics, however. The variability and overlap in patients' eligibility highlight the importance of evaluating each patient individually for a more personalized treatment approach. While there is a need to increase access for some of those eligible that may really need a biologic treatment, continuous efforts are required to develop alternatives to those who are not eligible.

Exploring the relationship between generalised anxiety/depression scales and asthma-specific quality of life/control questionnaires in a specialist asthma clinic

INTRODUCTION

Psychological issues are common in patients with chronic disabling diseases such as asthma. National guidance recommends that specialist asthma clinic attendees should complete questionnaires screening for psychological comorbidities. However, completing these in addition to asthma specific questionnaires can be burdensome. In order to investigate whether anxiety and depression questionnaires can be used in a targeted manner, this study investigates the correlation between the respective scores. We hypothesize that there is correlation between asthma-specific and anxiety/depression questionnaire scores.

METHODS

Three-hundred individuals with poorly controlled asthma attending a specialist clinic were asked to complete Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9). A Pearson correlation coefficient was generated and area under ROC and confusion matrices were used to assess correlation.

RESULTS

49% and 47% of patients completing the GAD-7 or PHQ-9 questionnaires, respectively had scores above the screening level for co-morbid anxiety and depression. Additional questionnaires were often incomplete (GAD-7 = 150 and PHQ-9 = 140). GAD-7 and PHQ-9 correlated with ACQ and mini-AQLQ (all p = <0.001, r values 0.53-0.65). Asthma-specific questionnaire scores were predictive of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores (AUCs of 0.78 to 0.84). 75% of patients with a mini-AQLQ score of <3 met the threshold GAD-7 and PHQ-9 score of 10.

CONCLUSIONS

ACQ and mini-AQLQ correlate with GAD-7 and PHQ-9 amongst specialist asthma clinic attendees. A mini-AQLQ >3 suggests patients are unlikely to have anxiety or depression. These findings could be used to identify patients requiring formal screening for psychological co-morbidity.

Systematic Assessment of Difficult-to-Treat Asthma: Principles and Perspectives

Difficult-to-treat asthma affects a minority of adults and children with asthma but represents a challenging mix of misdiagnosis, multimorbidity, inadequate self-management, severe airway pathobiology, and treatment complications. Management of these patients extends beyond asthma pharmacotherapy, because multiple other patient-related domains need to be addressed as well. Such complexity can hinder adequate clinical assessment even when performed in specialist practice. Systematic assessment undertaken by specialized multidisciplinary teams brings a broad range of resources to bear on patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. Although the concept of systematic assessment is not new, practices vary considerably and implementation is not universal. Nevertheless, assessment protocols are already in place in several institutions worldwide, and outcomes after such assessments have been highly encouraging. This review discusses the rationale, components, and benefits of systematic assessment, outlining its clinical utility and the available evidence for improved outcomes. It describes a range of service configurations and assessment approaches, drawing examples from severe asthma centers around the world to highlight common essential elements. It also provides a framework for establishing such services and discusses practical considerations for implementation.

Disease Burden and Long-Term Risk of Persistent Very Poorly Controlled Asthma: TENOR II

BACKGROUND

Severe/difficult-to-treat disease occurs in 5% to 10% of patients with asthma, but accounts for more than 50% of related economic costs. Understanding factors associated with persistent very poorly controlled (VPC) asthma may improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize persistent VPC asthma after more than 10 years of standard of care.

METHODS

The Epidemiology and Natural history of asthma: Outcomes and treatment Regimens (TENOR) II (N = 341) was a multicenter, observational study of patients with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma with a single, cross-sectional visit more than 10 years after TENOR I. Persistent VPC asthma was defined as VPC asthma at TENOR I and TENOR II enrollment; without VPC asthma was defined as well- or not well-controlled asthma at either or both visits. Multivariable logistic regression assessed long-term predictors of persistent VPC asthma using TENOR I baseline variables.

RESULTS

Of 327 patients, nearly half (48.0%, n = 157) had persistent VPC asthma. Comorbidities and asthma triggers were more frequent in patients with persistent VPC asthma than in patients without VPC asthma. Total geometric mean IgE was higher in patients with persistent VPC asthma (89.3 IU/mL vs 55.7 IU/mL); there was no difference in eosinophil levels. Lung function was lower in patients with persistent VPC asthma (mean % predicted pre- and postbronchodilator FEV₁, 63.0% vs 82.8% and 69.6% vs 87.2%, respectively). Exacerbations in the previous year were more likely in patients with persistent VPC asthma (29.7% vs 9.0%, respectively). Predictors of persistent VPC asthma were black versus white race/ethnicity, allergic trigger count (4 vs 0), systemic corticosteroid use, and postbronchodilator FEV₁ (per 10% decrease).

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of persistent VPC asthma is high in severe/difficult-to-treat disease; management of modifiable risk factors, maximization of lung function, and trigger avoidance may improve outcomes.

Potential Role of Cellular Senescence in Asthma

Cellular senescence is a complicated process featured by irreversible cell cycle arrest and senescence-associated secreted phenotype (SASP), resulting in accumulation of senescent cells, and low-grade inflammation. Cellular senescence not only occurs during the natural aging of normal cells, but also can be accelerated by various pathological factors. Cumulative studies have shown the role of cellular senescence in the pathogenesis of chronic lung diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) by promoting airway inflammation and airway remodeling. Recently, great interest has been raised in the involvement of cellular senescence in asthma. Limited but valuable data has indicated accelerating cellular senescence in asthma. This review will compile current findings regarding the underlying relationship between cellular senescence and asthma, mainly through discussing the potential mechanisms of cellular senescence in asthma, the impact of senescent cells on the pathobiology of asthma, and the efficiency and feasibility of using anti-aging therapies in asthmatic patients.

Comorbidities associated with severe asthma

Background:

Severe asthma can be a challenging disease to manage by the provider and by the patient, supported by evidence of increased health-care utilization by this population. Patients with severe asthma should be screened for comorbidities because these often contribute to poorly controlled asthma. The impact of comorbidities, however, are not completely understood.

Objective:

To review common comorbidities and their impact on severe asthma.

Methods:

A review of relevant clinical research studies that examined comorbidities in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma.

Results:

A number of comorbid diseases, including rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux, and obstructive sleep apnea, are associated with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. If present and untreated, these conditions may adversely affect asthma control, quality of life, and/or lung function, despite adequate treatment with step-up asthma controller therapy.

Conclusion:

Treatable comorbidities are associated with severe and difficult-to-control asthma. Failure to recognize these comorbidities may divert appropriate care and increase disease burden. Assessment and management of these risk factors may contribute to improved asthma outcome; however, more investigation is needed to understand the relationship of comorbidities and asthma due to inconsistency in the findings.

Severe asthma during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality associated with childhood asthma are driven disproportionately by children with severe asthma. However, it is not known from longitudinal studies whether children outgrow severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study prospectively whether well-characterized children with severe asthma outgrow their asthma during adolescence.

METHODS

Children with asthma were assessed at baseline with detailed questionnaires, allergy tests, and lung function tests and were reassessed annually for 3 years. The population was enriched for children with severe asthma, as assessed by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines, and subject classification was reassessed annually.

RESULTS

At baseline, 111 (59%) children had severe asthma. Year to year, there was a decrease in the proportion meeting the criteria for severe asthma. After 3 years, only 30% of subjects met the criteria for severe asthma (P < .001 compared with enrollment). Subjects experienced improvements in most indices of severity, including symptom scores, exacerbations, and controller medication requirements, but not lung function. Surprisingly, boys and girls were equally likely to has resolved asthma (33% vs 29%). The odds ratio in favor of resolution of severe asthma was 2.75 (95% CI, 1.02-7.43) for those with a peripheral eosinophil count of greater than 436 cells/μL.

CONCLUSIONS

In longitudinal analysis of this well-characterized cohort, half of the children with severe asthma no longer had severe asthma after 3 years; there was a stepwise decrease in the proportion meeting severe asthma criteria. Surprisingly, asthma severity decreased equally in male and female subjects. Peripheral eosinophilia predicted resolution. These data will be important for planning clinical trials in this population.

ERS/EAACI statement on severe exacerbations in asthma in adults: facts, priorities and key research questions

Despite the use of effective medications to control asthma, severe exacerbations in asthma are still a major health risk and require urgent action on the part of the patient and physician to prevent serious outcomes such as hospitalisation or death. Moreover, severe exacerbations are associated with substantial healthcare costs and psychological burden, including anxiety and fear for patients and their families. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) set up a task force to search for a clear definition of severe exacerbations, and to also define research questions and priorities. The statement includes comments from patients who were members of the task force.

Long-term effect of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in severe asthma

INTRODUCTION

Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has demonstrated its effectiveness amongst patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but has never been investigated in severe asthma.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, we included 28 patients with severe asthma (61.5 ± 16.2 years, FEV1: 51.4 ± 17.3%) and 164 matched COPD patients (64.3 ± 11.6 years, FEV1: 47.7 ± 15.5%) who had completed a home-based PR program and pursued at least 12 months of follow-up. The number of steps performed during a 6-min stepper test (6MST), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scores, and the Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire score (VSRQ) were compared between baseline, the post-PR period (post-PR) and after 12 months of follow-up (M12) within each group. The evolution of the 6MST, HAD and VSRQ values between baseline, post-PR and M12 was compared between severe asthma and COPD patients.

RESULTS

In the severe asthma group, the 6MST was higher post-PR (504 ± 150, p = 0.043) and at M12 (538 ± 163, p = 0.016) compared with baseline (450 ± 148). The VSRQ score was higher at M12 (39.0 ± 18.6, p = 0.049) but not post-PR (38.7 ± 15.8, p = 0.119) in comparison with baseline (32.2 ± 12.4). There was no difference in the HAD scores between baseline, post-PR and M12. PR outcome was not significantly different between severe asthma and COPD patients at short and long term (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In severe asthma, home-based PR is associated with improved exercise tolerance and quality of life on a long-term basis but does not modify anxiety and depression.

Severe asthma: Comparison of different classifications of severity and control

BACKGROUND

Criteria of asthma severity and control lack standardization.

OBJECTIVE

to compare classifications of asthma severity and control, applied to patients from a severe asthma clinic.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of 473 patients followed up for ≥6 months, reclassified using three criteria: 1) the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010, 2) the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 2000, and 3) the European Respiratory Society (ERS)/ATS 2014. In order to evaluate disease control, the 2012 and 2014 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) classifications were compared.

RESULTS

According to the definition of WHO 2010, 429 had Difficult-to-treat severe asthma and only 12 presented Treatment-resistant severe asthma. 114 patients had Refractory asthma by ATS 2000 and 88 had Severe asthma by ERS/ATS 2014. Considering the definitions of WHO 2010, only 9 out of 12 with Treatment-resistant and 64 out of 429 with Difficult-to-treat severe asthma met the criteria of ATS 2000 and ERS/ATS 2014. As for GINA classification of control, 208 (44%) of the 473 subjects were classified as having asthma controlled by the 2014 criteria, whereas only 45 (10%) patients had controlled asthma by the GINA 2012 criteria. The Kappa statistic indicates the highest agreement of the severity classification occurred between the criteria of ATS 2000 and ERS/ATS 2014 (0.64).

CONCLUSION

Good agreement was found between Refractory asthma ATS 2000 and Severe asthma ERS/ATS 2014 classifications. However, poor agreement was observed between the severity rating proposed by the WHO and other classifications. The GINA control classifications of 2012 and 2014 also agreed poorly.

Trends and determinants of Emergency Room admissions for asthma: A retrospective evaluation in Northeast Italy

Background

Asthma still represents a cause of death and hospital admissions worldwide. Our study aimed at analyzing the trend of Emergency Room (ER) asthma admissions in Northeast Italy in order to investigate the relevance of specific patient-related determinants and environmental triggers (pollens, mold spores, and pollutants).

Methods

Retrospective data from admissions for asthma exacerbations registered between the years 2013 and 2015 in two main ERs in Northeast Italy were collected. Data about patients' age, sex and nationality were recorded. Classification of disease severity followed the current Italian ER triage scoring system (white: no need for emergency treatment; green: need for fast treatment; yellow: severe condition; red: life-threatening condition). Data on pollen/mold spore counts and pollutants were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 1745 ​ER admissions for asthma were registered, with a persistent and significant increase year by year. A slight prevalence of females and patients over 50 years old was observed. Immigrants accounted for 32%, 36% and 26% of admissions respectively in 2013, 2014 and 2015. The prevalence of immigrants' admissions was significantly higher when comparing the relative ratio of immigrant populations/Italian nationals (p ​< ​0.05). The admissions were coded as follows: white, 6.30%; green, 35.36%; yellow, 39.37%; red, 18.97%. People aged ≥50 years were more frequently admitted with a red code, but the trend was not statistically significant (p ​= ​0,0815). By contrast, amongst immigrants there was a higher prevalence of white and green codes observed in comparison with Italian nationals. Grass pollen peak and PM₁₀ high levels represented environmental determinants of ER admissions increase.

Conclusions

The increasing rate of asthma-related ER admissions highlights the need for implementing asthma control strategies. Investigating the traits of patients referring to ER for asthma exacerbations, as well as environmental-related determinants, may help in identifying at-risk individuals and in orienting preventive strategies accordingly. Immigrants represent the most vulnerable sub-population, and their potential difficulties in accessing treatments and health services should be specifically addressed. Overall, implementing patient education in order to improve treatment adherence, as well as providing an asthma action plan to every asthmatic patient, continue to be the most urgent needs.