ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Low Back Pain: 2021 Update

Implementing appropriateness criteria for use of imaging technology (Project ACUITY) in magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: a Singapore experience

INTRODUCTION

Uncomplicated acute low back pain is usually self-limiting and does not warrant imaging. However, despite current recommendations, many patients continue to receive spinal imaging, increasing healthcare costs. The Ministry of Health, Singapore, convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to develop a consensus guideline on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine (Agency for Care Effectiveness [ACE] guideline) for low back pain that was incorporated into electronic radiology order forms. We analysed the MRI orders following implementation of the guideline.

METHODS

A list of 'appropriate' and 'inappropriate' indications was developed based on existing literature. These indications were inserted into the MRI of the lumbar spine request form within the electronic system. It was mandatory for clinicians to specify on a drop-down list of indications. For 'inappropriate' indications, clinicians are required to fill out a free-text 'pop up' elaborating on their clinical reasoning for the MRI request.

RESULTS

Baseline pre-intervention data were collected over 3 months. A total of 492 MRI scans were performed with 64 (13.0%) inappropriate orders. Post-intervention, we retrospectively analysed two sets of data over 3 months each in 2021 and 2022. In 2021, there were 86 (9.1%) inappropriate orders out of 940 scans performed. In 2022, there were 38 (7.3%) inappropriate studies out of 521 scans performed. There was a statistically significant overall decrease in inappropriate scans from 13.0% pre-intervention to 7.3% post-intervention ( P = 0.01). Among all the 124 inappropriate studies post-intervention, only one patient eventually required surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the positive impact of implementing a local guideline through electronic medical records in reducing inappropriate MRI of the lumbar spine for low back pain. Further studies on the impact of other behavioural nudges are recommended.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Spine Imaging Referral Guideline

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Spine Expert Panel is made up of physicians from the disciplines of radiology, emergency medicine, neurology, neurosurgery, physiatry, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 10 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 23 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 22 recommendation statements across the 8 scenarios (one scenario points to the CAR Trauma Referral Guideline and one scenario points to the CAR Musculoskeletal Guideline). This guideline presents the methods of development and the referral recommendations for myelopathy, suspected spinal infection, possible atlanto-axial instability (non-traumatic), axial pain (non-traumatic), radicular pain (non-traumatic), cauda equina syndrome, suspected spinal tumour, and suspected compression fracture. Spondyloarthropathies and spine trauma point to other CAR Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guidelines, Musculoskeletal and Trauma, respectively.

Appropriateness of lumbar spine imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department with low back pain in a Western Australian tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

The Australian Rheumatology Association identified the use of imaging in patients with low back pain without indication of serious pathology as a low-value practice.

AIMS

To determine the appropriateness of diagnostic lumbar spine imaging requests in patients with low back pain presenting to a Western Australian hospital's emergency department.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all adult patients (18 years and older) who presented with low back pain to the Fiona Stanley Hospital emergency department from 1 July 2020 to 31 December 2020. The appropriateness of the imaging requests was judged using the American College of Radiology's Appropriateness Criteria. The number and proportion of appropriate and inappropriate lumbar spine imaging requests were reported overall and by imaging modality together with reasons for the judgements.

RESULTS

A total of 1459 patients were included. Three hundred eight patients (21.1%) received lumbar spine imaging requests, with 350 diagnostic imaging requests eligible for analysis. Two hundred eighty (80.0%) imaging requests were judged to be appropriate (194/253 (76.7%) plain radiographs, 57/66 (86.4%) computed tomography, 29/31 (93.5%) magnetic resonance imaging). The most common reasons for an appropriate imaging request were suspected vertebral fracture (n = 223, 79.6%), followed by malignancy (n = 26, 9.3%). Of the 70 inappropriate imaging requests, 62 (88.6%) requests occurred in the absence of alerting features and eight (11.4%) requests were the wrong choice of modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Four in five lumbar spine imaging requests for investigating low back pain were appropriate. Of the inappropriate requests, the most common reason was the absence of alerting features, while a small number were the incorrect imaging modality.

Understanding patients' perceptions of uncomplicated low back pain: a theory-informed qualitative study using the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model

BACKGROUND

Uncomplicated low-back pain (LBP), referring to LBP without symptoms that suggest an underlying medical or surgical cause, is a common and challenging problem for patients and primary healthcare providers. Multiple guidelines discourage the use of diagnostic imaging for uncomplicated LBP due to cost and lack of benefit; despite this, diagnostic imaging remains overused in this condition. Study of primary healthcare providers suggests that patient expectations contribute to imaging for uncomplicated LBP. Dedicated study of patient understanding and experiences of uncomplicated LBP is necessary to design interventions to reduce unnecessary diagnostic imaging.

METHODS

In this theory-guided qualitative study, people with uncomplicated LBP were recruited for a semi-structured interview. The Common Sense - Self-Regulation Model (CS-SRM), a framework that explores the relationship between a patient's perceptions, beliefs, and behaviors around their illness and the outcome of their illness, was selected to direct development of the interview guide and analysis. Higher-level themes were created to list patient-related drivers of unnecessary diagnostic imaging for uncomplicated LBP.

RESULTS

Thirteen participants (7 female) had experienced uncomplicated LBP for a median of 5 years (IQR 2-20 years; range 1 to 30 years). Framework analysis based on the CS-SRM suggested that most participants understood their uncomplicated LBP as a permanent part of their lives, though some felt that the pain could be controlled or prevented. Participants shared a range of coping mechanisms, including social support, medication, and exercises. For most participants, uncomplicated LBP negatively affected their lives emotional wellbeing characterized by a sense of loss from missing life events due to pain. Nearly all participants had visited their primary care physician (n = 11) and most underwent diagnostic imaging (n = 8); however, participants generally reported that they had not requested diagnostic imaging (n = 8). Several participants reported that they wanted validation and symptom-management advice from their physician rather than diagnostic tests.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to other studies, we report that most patients with uncomplicated LBP in our setting did not request diagnostic imaging. Patient-facing interventions to address unnecessary diagnostic imaging for uncomplicated LBP may be more effective if they address illness conceptions identified in this study; for example, interventions should convey empathy by acknowledging patient worries, validating suffering, describing potential causes or triggers, addressing self-management strategies, and describing the natural history of uncomplicated LBP.

Preprocedural Imaging Review Before Performing Epidural Steroid Injections: Analysis of Physician Practice Parameters

Introduction: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a common interventional treatment for managing spinal pain complaints. Despite their widespread use, practice patterns among physicians performing ESIs vary significantly. This study aimed to evaluate preprocedural imaging review by pain physicians who perform ESIs in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. Methods: A survey was distributed to a cohort of physicians who regularly perform ESIs. The survey comprised questions regarding preprocedural imaging review before performing ESIs in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. The respondents included a diverse group of pain management physicians from various specialties and practice settings. Results: The results revealed that the majority of interventional pain management physicians personally interpret their own imaging, followed by a significant percentage of physicians who rely on the radiology reports. There were no physicians who did not perform any imaging review prior to ESIs. Whereas all respondents reported some form of imaging review, only 63.86%, 53.75%, and 64.44% reviewed the actual images prior to cervical, thoracic, and lumbar access, respectively. Conclusions: This survey provides initial data regarding imaging reviews among physicians who perform ESIs. Our results demonstrate that physicians treat imaging review as an essential component of the preprocedural process for performing ESIs, as all physicians reported that they perform some form of imaging review before performing ESIs. However, there is only partial adherence to the multidisciplinary working group opinion that segmental imaging should be reviewed for adequacy of space prior to cervical epidural access.

A Multidimensional Regression Model for Predicting Recurrence in Chronic Low Back Pain

BACKGROUND

Recurrence is common in chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, predicting the recurrence risk remains a challenge. The aim is to develop and validate a machine learning tool to predict the recurrence risk in patients with CLBP by using multidimensional medical information.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study consecutively enrolled 341 patients with CLBP from two hospitals between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. Patients from both centres were used for model development and internal validation, employing multivariate logistic regression (MRL) along with three additional machine learning algorithms. The multidimensional model (MDM) was used to predict recurrence in the next 2 years and was compared with the widely used prognostic tool, the STarT BACK Tool (SBT). The models' performance in detecting recurrence was evaluated using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients (38.42%) experienced recurrence. In the MRL model, factors linked to recurrence odds included progressive lower limb weakness, anxiety, mechanical pressure test, number of previous episodes, Oswestry disability index and multifidus proton density fat fraction. For recurrence prediction, the MRL-MDM achieved an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI, 0.765-0.862), sensitivity of 85.2% and specificity of 70.2% in internal validation. In comparison, the SBT for recurrence had an AUC of 0.555 (95% CI, 0.518-0.592), sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 17.6%.

CONCLUSION

The MDM may predict recurrence in patients with CLBP over a 2-year period, surpassing the performance of SBT.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study found that the STarT BACK tool is suboptimal in predicting the 2-year recurrence of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Our proposed multidimensional machine learning model aids clinicians in identifying patients at high risk for future recurrence of CLBP and in implementing appropriate preventive measures. Given the considerable healthcare resource utilisation associated with the frequent recurrence of CLBP, our novel model provides significant assistance in addressing this issue, demonstrating substantial clinical relevance.

Assessment of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures with T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans

Osteoporosis is related to changes in vertebral bone marrow tissues, which can be detected by MRI. A novel MRI scoring method based on routine T1 and T2 sequences has been developed and demonstrated capabilities in detecting osteoporosis and discriminating vertebral fractures. The scoring method may provide an alternative tool other than BMD measurement for broad, opportunistic use in clinics.

PURPOSE

As a routinely used radiation-free modality at the spine, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is promising to assess osteoporosis because it can detect age- or osteoporosis-related changes in bone marrow tissues. Here, we proposed a new MRI scoring method using the patient's low-back subcutaneous fat and cerebrospinal fluid as reference controls on routine T1 and T2 sequences, respectively, to indicate proton-rich changes in vertebrae for assessing osteoporosis and vertebral fractures.

METHODS

The study included 60 female patients (64.1 ± 15.9 years) who underwent both MRI and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at spine. T1-based F-scoresc.fat and T2-based W-scorecs.fluid were defined as the median signal intensity (SI) from L1 to L5 over their reference controls. QCT-measured vertebral BMD was used for defining osteoporosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the new scores for osteoporosis and vertebral fractures, which were also compared with L1-L5 signal-to-noise ratio (SNRL1-L5) or SNR-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score.

RESULTS

The F-scoresc.fat and W-scorecs.fluid increased significantly by 25.3% and 22%, respectively, in patients with osteoporosis compared to non-osteoporosis. Age was also found to be significantly different between non-osteoporosis and osteoporosis (49.92 and 74.03 years, p < .001). ROC analysis indicated that F-scoresc.fat had a greater AUC value (0.85, p < .001) than VBQ score (0.77) and SNRL1-L5 (0.71) when being used to detect osteoporosis. For separating vertebral fractures from non-fractures, F-scoresc.fat resulted in the largest AUC value of 0.81 (p < .001), compared to W-scorecs.fluid (0.74), VBQ (0.72), and SNRL1-L5 (0.75).

CONCLUSION

A new MRI scoring method based on routine T1 and T2 sequences has been developed and demonstrated improved abilities in detecting osteoporosis and discriminating vertebral fractures over VBQ and SNR.

Comparing radiologists and radiographers' assessment of MRI referrals for low back pain: Insights from two imaging centres in Norway

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the differences in MRI referral assessments for low back pain (LBP) between radiologists and in-house trained radiographers.

METHODS

This is the second part of a retrospective study where MRI referrals for LBP conducted within two imaging centres in Norway were assessed for justification and referral quality. This study examines differences in how the recruited assessors (four radiologists and two radiographers) evaluated the referrals. The collected data was sorted in Microsoft Excel version 2021. Stata Statistical Software (Release 18) was used for data analysis. Mixed model analysis was used to compare the radiographers and radiologists' assessment of justification and referral quality. Gwet's agreement coefficient AC1/AC2 was used to determine the variation of agreements between the assessors in justification, and Gwet's AC2 between the assessor in referral quality. Kappa statistics was used to assess the interrater reliability between the two professions. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total n = 300 patients' MRI referrals for LBP from the two imaging centres were collected and assessed. The two radiographers and one radiologist assessed 75 % of the referrals as justified, while the other radiologists had an overall justification rate ranging from 50 to 60 %. In general, radiographers more frequently assigned referrals as being of good and intermediate quality compared to radiologists. The study showed a statistically significant difference (p < .001) between radiographers and radiologists 'assessment of justification and quality of MRI referrals for LBP.

CONCLUSION

Radiographers assessed a higher proportion of referrals as justified and of good quality compared to radiologists, highlighting the need for targeted training to enhance radiographers' referral assessment skills.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Radiographers are assigned tasks to justify imaging in radiology departments; however, targeted training is essential to ensure consistent and accurate referral assessments, ultimately enhancing patient care and optimising the use of resources.

Early physiotherapy referral for low back pain reduces healthcare utilisation for advanced imaging and specialist spine surgery consultations

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common presenting complaints among patients and the costliest orthopaedic condition. This study aimed to compare the healthcare utilisation rates of advanced imaging and specialist consultations for LBP between patients presenting with early physiotherapy (EPT) before specialist review and routine physiotherapy (RPT) after specialist review.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who (n = 311) had been referred to specialist spine surgery for LBP in 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline demographics, healthcare utilisation rates and clinical outcomes were compared between those who attended EPT before spine surgery consultation and those who attended RPT after specialist consultation.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or clinical outcomes of Visual Analogue Scale pain scores, EuroQol 5-Dimension scores and surgery rates between the EPT (n = 183) and RPT (n = 128) groups. At 6 months follow-up, EPT was associated with significantly lower magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rates (P = 0.026), decreased likelihood of requiring MRI (odds ratio [OR] 0.865, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.757-0.990), reduced number of specialist spine surgery consultations (P < 0.001), decreased likelihood of requiring additional specialist consultations (OR 0.770, 95% CI 0.655-0.905), fewer physiotherapy sessions (P = 0.001) and decreased likelihood of requiring additional physiotherapy sessions (OR 0.835, 95% CI 0.553-1.261).

CONCLUSIONS

Early physiotherapy reduces the (a) overall treatment duration from the first referral by the primary physician, (b) number of advanced imaging ordered (and thus, associated imaging costs), and (c) total number of clinic and therapy sessions, and it is safe and allows patients to achieve comparable functional outcomes to their counterparts undergoing RPT. These findings support the implementation of EPT for patients with LBP to reduce healthcare utilisation and associated costs for patients, providers and healthcare systems.

Can clinical presentation predict radiologically confirmed cauda equina syndrome: retrospective case review of 530 cases at a tertiary emergency department

PURPOSE

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) may have significant individual consequences if diagnostic delays occur. Our aim was to evaluate the presenting subjective and objective features of patients with suspected CES in comparison to those with radiologically confirmed cauda equina compression (CEC)..

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all cases presenting with suspected CES to a tertiary emergency care unit over a two-year period. CEC was defined as radiological confirmation of CEC by Consultant Musculoskeletal (MSK) Radiologist report (MSK-CEC) and by measured canal occupancy due to an acute disc extrusion (> 75%)[measured by a Senior Spinal Surgeon (SP-CEC)]. Routine data collection was compared between categories. Chi square, multivariate regression analyses and ROC analysis of multiple predictors was performed.

RESULTS

530 patients were included in this analysis, 60 (11.3%) had MSK-CEC, and 470 had NO- CEC. Only 43/60 (71.7%) had emergent surgery. Those with MSK-CEC and SP-CEC were statistically more likely to present with bilateral leg pain [(MSK-CEC OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.2, 5.8; p = 0.02)(SP-CEC OR 4.7, 95%CI 1.7, 12.8; p = 0.003)]; and absent bilateral ankle reflexes [(MSK-CEC OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.0, 9.6; p < 0.001)(SP CEC OR 2.5; 95%CI 1.0, 6.19; p = 0.05)] on multivariate analysis. The ROC curve analysis acceptable diagnostic utility of having SP-CEC when both are present [Area under the curve 0.72 (95%CI 0.61, 0.83); p < 0.0001].

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that in those presenting with CES symptoms, the presence of both bilateral leg pain and absent ankle reflexes pose an acceptable diagnostic tool to predict a large acute disc herniation on MRI scan..

Impact of Patient-reported Symptom Information on the Interpretation of MRI of the Lumbar Spine

Background Distinguishing lumbar pain generators from incidental findings at MRI can be difficult. Dictated reports may become lists of findings that cannot be ranked in order of diagnostic importance. Purpose To determine whether patient-reported symptom information can improve the interpretation of lumbar spine MRI by using the spine specialist as the reference standard. Materials and Methods This prospective, single-center, multireader study analyzed 240 participants who completed pre-MRI symptom questionnaires between May 2022 and February 2023. At the time of clinical MRI reporting, radiologists recorded pain generators in consecutive participants, creating two study groups by alternating interpretations with versus without symptom questionnaire results (SQR). Diagnostic certainty was recorded using a numeric scale of 0 to 100. Types, levels, and sides of pain generators were compared with reference diagnoses by calculating Cohen κ values with 95% CIs. Participant characteristics and diagnostic certainties were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum, Pearson χ2, or Kruskal-Wallis test. Interrater agreement was analyzed. Results There was no difference in age (P = .69) or sex (P = .60) between participants using SQR (n = 120; mean age, 61.0 years; 62 female) and not using SQR (n = 120; mean age, 62.5 years; 67 female). When radiologists were compared with specialists, agreements on pain generators were almost perfect for interpretations using SQR (type: κ = 0.82 [95% CI: 0.74,0.89]; level: κ = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.95]; side: κ = 0.84 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.92]), but only fair to moderate for interpretations not using SQR (type: κ = 0.26 [95% CI: 0.15, 0.36]; level: κ = 0.51 [95% CI: 0.39, 0.63]; side: κ = 0.30 [95% CI: 0.18, 0.42]) (all P < .001). Diagnostic certainty was higher for MRI interpretations using SQR (mean, 80.4 ± 14.9 [SD]) than MRI interpretations not using SQR (60.5 ± 17.7) (P < .001). Interrater agreements were substantial (κ = 0.65-0.78) for MRI interpretations using SQR but only fair to moderate (κ = 0.24-0.49) for MRI interpretations not using SQR (all P < .001). Conclusion Patient-reported symptom information enabled radiologists to achieve nearly perfect diagnostic agreement with clinical experts. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Isikbay and Shah in this issue.

Modern low-field MRI

This narrative review explores recent advancements and applications of modern low-field (≤ 1 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in musculoskeletal radiology. Historically, high-field MRI systems (1.5 T and 3 T) have been the standard in clinical practice due to superior image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. However, recent technological advancements in low-field MRI offer promising avenues for musculoskeletal imaging. General principles of low-field MRI systems are being introduced, highlighting their strengths and limitations compared to high-field counterparts. Emphasis is placed on advancements in hardware design, including novel magnet configurations, gradient systems, and radiofrequency coils, which have improved image quality and reduced susceptibility artifacts particularly in musculoskeletal imaging. Different clinical applications of modern low-field MRI in musculoskeletal radiology are being discussed. The diagnostic performance of low-field MRI in diagnosing various musculoskeletal pathologies, such as ligament and tendon injuries, osteoarthritis, and cartilage lesions, is being presented. Moreover, the discussion encompasses the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of low-field MRI systems, making them viable options for imaging centers with limited resources or specific patient populations. From a scientific standpoint, the amount of available data regarding musculoskeletal imaging at low-field strengths is limited and often several decades old. This review will give an insight to the existing literature and summarize our own experiences with a modern low-field MRI system over the last 3 years. In conclusion, the narrative review highlights the potential clinical utility, challenges, and future directions of modern low-field MRI, offering valuable insights for radiologists and healthcare professionals seeking to leverage these advancements in their practice.

A comparison of available guidelines for the detection of cauda equina syndrome and assessing the need for further clinical guidance in Ireland

The cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but critical disorder, which can result in devastating motor weakness and sensory deficit, alongside often irreversible bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. In addition to the clinical burden of disease, this syndrome results in a disproportionately high medicolegal strain due to missed or delayed diagnoses. Despite being an emergency diagnosis, often necessitating urgent surgical decompression to treat, we believe there is a lack of clarity for clinicians in the current literature, with no published Irish guideline concerning screening or detection. The current study aims to identify and analyse appropriate guidelines in relation to CES screening which are available to clinicians in Ireland. The study design included a comprehensive literature review and comparison of existing guidelines. The review identified 13 sources of appropriate guidance for clinicians working in Ireland. These resources included textbooks, websites and guidelines developed in the UK. No Irish guidelines or advice were available on CES screening/treatment at the time of review. This review demonstrated the lack of consensus and guidance for clinicians in Ireland on how to effectively screen for CES, judge who requires further imaging and investigations and how to rule out the condition. A national consensus on thorough screening and prompt investigation for CES is necessary, and the formulation of new CES guidelines would be a welcome addition to what is available to clinicians currently.

Physical therapist awareness of diagnostic imaging referral jurisdictional scope of practice: an observational study

OBJECTIVES

To examine physical therapist awareness and utilization of imaging referral privileges in the United States (US) and how it relates to direct access frequency.

METHODS

This study utilized survey data collected in 2020-2021 from US physical therapists. Subjects were asked about imaging referral jurisdictional authority in their state. Responses were analyzed for accuracy and compared to the level of jurisdictional authority and its impact on imaging referral. Analysis of imaging skills performance and imaging referral practices were compared to direct access frequency.

RESULTS

Only 42.0% of physical therapists practicing in states that allow imaging referral were aware of this privilege. Those practicing where imaging referral was allowed via state legislation were significantly more likely (p < 0.01) to be aware of this privilege (71.4%) compared to those granted by the state board (25.2%). Those aware of their imaging referral scope were more likely (p < 0.01) to practice imaging referral (44.5%) compared to those who were unaware (3.2%). Direct access frequency was positively associated with imaging skill performance and imaging referral practice (p < 0.01). Doctors of Physical Therapy, residency/fellowship-trained physical therapists, and board-certified physical therapists all reported practicing greater frequency of direct access (p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

There is a striking lack of awareness of imaging privileges among physical therapists as influenced by the level of jurisdictional scope. These results suggest that the lack of awareness may have a dampening effect on diagnostic imaging referrals. The American Physical Therapy Association should consider engaging with state boards to raise imaging privilege awareness.

Chiropractors' perceptions on the use of spinal radiographs in clinical practice: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Radiography is commonly used in the assessment of spinal disorders, despite a lack of high-quality evidence demonstrating improved clinical outcomes or additional benefit to the patient. There is disagreement amongst chiropractors regarding the appropriate use of radiography for clinical management. This study aims to qualitatively explore chiropractors' perceptions on the use of spinal radiographs in clinical practice with respect to how they determine when to order radiographs; and how they use radiographs to inform clinical management.

METHODS

Online qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 Australian chiropractors who currently manage patients with spinal disorders. Convienence, snowball, and purposive sampling strategies were used to ensure an appropriate breadth and depth of participant characterisitcs and beliefs. Interview data were recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were developed to describe how chiropractors determined when to order radiographs. These themes included specific findings from the clinical encounter that may inform clinical management, their perceptions of radiation risk, and the influence of clinical experience/intuition. Three themes and four subthemes were developed for how chiropractors use radiographs to inform their management. These themes explored the use of radiography for the application of chiropractic technique, as well as the role of radiographs in predicting patient prognosis, and as an educational tool to provide reassurance.

CONCLUSION

Australian chiropractors' decision-making around spinal radiography is diverse and can be influenced by a number of clinical and external factors. Previously unexplored uses of spinal radiography in clinical practice were highlighted. Some chiropractors reported potential benefits of radiography that are currently not supported by research evidence. Future research should address how radiographic findings are reported to patients with spinal disorders and how this could be optimised to improve patient outcomes.

Emergency Department Management of Low Back Pain: A Comparative Review of Guidelines and Practices

This narrative review examines the current best practices and guidelines for integrating pharmacologic interventions, imaging, and physiotherapy in the management of low back pain. The review also explores how patient factors such as age, sex, comorbidities, and prevalent pathologies/diagnoses influence the choice and effectiveness of these treatment approaches.

Developing an initial set of quality indicators for chiropractic care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Quality indicators are standardized, evidence-based measures of health care quality. Currently, there is no basic set of quality indicators for chiropractic care published in peer-reviewed literature. The goal of this research is to develop a preliminary set of quality indicators, measurable with administrative data.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review searching PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Index to Chiropractic Literature databases. Eligible articles were published after 2011, in English, developing/reporting best practices and clinical guidelines specifically developed for, or directly applicable to, chiropractic care. Eligible non-peer-reviewed sources such as quality measures published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Royal College of Chiropractors quality standards were also included. Following a stepwise eligibility determination process, data abstraction identified specific statements from included sources that can conceivably be measured with administrative data. Once identified, statements were transformed into potential indicators by: 1) Generating a brief title and description; 2) Documenting a source; 3) Developing a metric; and 4) Assigning a Donabedian category (structure, process, outcome). Draft indicators then traversed a 5-step assessment: 1) Describes a narrowly defined structure, process, or outcome; 2) Quantitative data can conceivably be available; 3) Performance is achievable; 4) Metric is relevant; 5) Data are obtainable within reasonable time limits. Indicators meeting all criteria were included in the final set.

RESULTS

Literature searching revealed 2562 articles. After removing duplicates and conducting eligibility determination, 18 remained. Most were clinical guidelines (n = 10) and best practice recommendations (n = 6), with 1 consensus and 1 clinical standards development study. Data abstraction and transformation produced 204 draft quality indicators. Of those, 57 did not meet 1 or more assessment criteria. After removing duplicates, 70 distinct indicators remained. Most indicators matched the Donabedian category of process (n = 35), with 31 structure and 4 outcome indicators. No sources were identified to support indicator development from patient perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

This article proposes a preliminary set of 70 quality indicators for chiropractic care, theoretically measurable with administrative data and largely obtained from electronic health records. Future research should assess feasibility, achieve stakeholder consensus, develop additional indicators including those considering patient perspectives, and study relationships with clinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/t7kgm.

Development of a low back pain care pathway in an academic hospital system: results of a consensus process

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and a significant component of healthcare expenditures. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been highlighted as a key resource to improve the quality of care. This study aimed to develop a clinical pathway for LBP based on CPGs in an academic health system.

METHODS

We conducted a modified Delphi study of clinicians caring for patients with LBP who were asked to rate 21 CPG-informed seed statements through an online survey. The goal was to identify statements that achieved a minimum of 80% consensus among panelists.

RESULTS

Thirty-five healthcare providers participated as panelists. The majority of participants were male (68.6%), had MD or DO (62.9%) degrees, and were clinicians (73.8%) working in neurosurgery (36.1%), orthopedics (25.7%), emergency medicine (14.3%), or physical therapy (11.4%). Initially, consensus was reached on 20 of 21 seed statements. One statement did not reach consensus in the initial round and was revised into two separate statements based on feedback from panelists. One of these statements achieved consensus in the second review round. All statements reaching consensus were incorporated into a care pathway consisting of diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment for LBP.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare providers across various disciplines supported statements interpreting current CPGs related to care for LBP. This study represents a step toward supporting guideline-concordant care for LBP. Additional research is needed to assess how such pathways impact actual clinical care.

Imaging Wisely Campaign: Initiative to Reduce Imaging for Low Back Pain Across a Large Safety Net System

OBJECTIVES

Low back pain is a common clinical presentation that often results in expensive and unnecessary imaging that may lead to undue patient harm, including unnecessary procedures. We present an initiative in a safety net system to reduce imaging for low back pain.

METHODS

This quality improvement study was conducted across 70 ambulatory clinics and 11 teaching hospitals. Three electronic health record changes, using the concept of a nudge, were introduced into orders for lumbar radiography (x-ray), lumbar CT, and lumbar MRI. The primary outcome was the number of orders per 1,000 patient-days or encounters for each imaging test in the inpatient, ambulatory, and emergency department (ED) settings. Variation across facilities was assessed, along with selected indications.

RESULTS

Across all clinical environments, there were statistically significant decreases in level differences pre- and postintervention for lumbar x-ray (-52.9% for inpatient encounters, P < .001; -23.7% for ambulatory encounters, P < .001; and -17.3% for ED only encounters, P < .01). There was no decrease in ordering of lumbar CTs in the inpatient and ambulatory settings, although there was an increase in lumbar CTs in ED-only encounters. There was no difference in lumbar MRI ordering. Variation was seen across all hospitals and clinics.

DISCUSSION

Our intervention successfully decreased lumbar radiography across all clinical settings, with a reduction in lumbar CTs in the inpatient and ambulatory settings. There were no changes for lumbar MRI orders.

Development of Preliminary Integrated Health Care Clinical Competencies for United States Doctor of Chiropractic Programs: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process

Background

There has been rapid growth of chiropractors pursuing career opportunities in both public and private hospitals and other integrated care settings. Chiropractors that prosper in integrated care settings deliver patient-centered care, focus on the institutional mission, understand and adhere to organizational rules, and are proficient in navigating complex systems. The Council on Chiropractic Education Accreditation Standards do not outline specific meta-competencies for integrated care clinical training.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to develop preliminary integrated health care competencies for DC programs to guide the advancement of clinical chiropractic education.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed. Articles were screened for eligibility and extracted in duplicate. Domains and seed statements were generated from this literature, piloted at a conference workshop, and evaluated via a modified Delphi consensus process. Of 42 invited, 36 chiropractors participated as panelists. Public comment period yielded 20 comments, none resulting in substantive changes to the competencies.

Results

Of 1718 citations, 23 articles met eligibility criteria. After 2 modified Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on all competency statements. A total of 78 competency statements were agreed upon, which encompassed 4 domains and 11 subdomains. The 4 domains were: 1) Collaboration, (2) Clinical Excellence, (3) Communication, and (4) Systems Administration.

Conclusion

We identified 78 preliminary competencies appropriate for preparing DC students and early career chiropractors for clinical practice in integrated healthcare settings. Educational programs may consider these competencies for curricular design and reform to strengthen DC program graduates for integrated practice, advanced training, and employment.

Diagnostic accuracy of lumbar CT and MRI in the evaluation of chronic low back pain without red flag symptoms

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent reasons for medical consultation. Most of the patients will have nonspecific LBP, which usually are self-limited episodes. It is unclear which of the diagnostic imaging pathways is most effective and costeffective and how the imaging impacts on patient treatment. Imaging techniques are usually indicated if symptoms remain after 6 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic imaging examination of choice in lumbar spine evaluation of low back pain; however, availability of MRI is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) with MRI (as standard of reference) in the evaluation of chronic low back pain (LBP) without red flags symptoms. To compare the results obtained by two radiologists with different grades of experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with chronic low back pain without red flags symptoms were retrospectively reviewed by two observers with different level of experience. Patients included had undergone a lumbar or abdominal CT and an MRI within a year. Once the radiological information was collected, it was then statistically reviewed. The aim of the statistical analysis is to identify the equivalence between both diagnostic techniques. To this end, sensitivity, specificity and validity index were calculated. In addition, intra and inter-observer reliability were measured by Cohen's kappa values and also using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

340 lumbar levels were evaluated from 68 adult patients with chronic low back pain or sciatica. 63.2% of them were women, with an average age of 60.3 years (SD 14.7). CT shows high values of sensitivity and specificity (>80%) in most of the items evaluated, but sensitivity was low for the evaluation of density of the disc (40%) and for the detection of disc herniation (55%). Moreover, agreement between MRI and CT in most of these items was substantial or almost perfect (Cohen's kappa-coefficient > 0'8), excluding Modic changes (kappa = 0.497), degenerative changes (kappa0.688), signal of the disc (kappa = 0.327) and disc herniation (kappa = 0.639). Finally, agreement between both observers is mostly high (kappa > 0.8). Foraminal stenosis, canal stenosis and the grade of the canal stenosis were overdiagnosed by the inexperienced observer in the evaluation of CT images.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

CT is as sensitive as lumbar MRI in the evaluation of most of the items analysed, excluding Modic changes, degenerative changes, signal of the disc and disc herniation. In addition, these results are obtained regardless the experience of the radiologist. The rising use of diagnostic medical imaging and the improvement of image quality brings the opportunity of making a second look of abdominal CT in search of causes of LBP. Thereby, inappropriate medical imaging could be avoided (2). In addition, it would allow to reduce MRI waiting list and prioritize other patients with more severe pathology than LBP.

Update on Pediatric Spine Imaging

The spine is often difficult to evaluate clinically in children, increasing the importance of diagnostic imaging to detect a wide variety of spinal disorders ranging from congenital abnormalities to severe infections. Clinical history and physical examination can help determine whether imaging is needed and which imaging technique would be best. The most common cause for back pain, even in children, is muscular strain/spasm that does not require any imaging. However, red flags such as pain at age < 5 years, constant pain, night pain, radicular pain, pain lasting > 4 weeks, or an abnormal neurologic examination may require further investigation. Imaging can be of great value for diagnosis but must be interpreted along with the clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory findings to achieve an accurate diagnosis. We discuss imaging for the most common and/or important spine pathologies in children: congenital and developmental pathologies, trauma, infectious processes, inflammatory causes, and tumors.

Management of acute non-specific low back pain in the emergency department: do emergency physicians follow the guidelines? Results of a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES

Clinical guidelines for acute non-specific low back pain (LBP) recommend avoiding imaging studies or invasive treatments and to advise patients to stay active. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of acute non-specific LBP in the emergency departments (ED).

SETTING

We invited all department chiefs of Swiss EDs and their physician staff to participate in a web-based survey using two clinical case vignettes of patients with acute non-specific LBP presenting to an ED. In both cases, no neurological deficits or red flags were present. Guideline adherence and low-value care was defined based on current guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

In total, 263 ED physicians completed at least one vignette, while 212 completed both vignettes (43% residents, 32% senior/attending physicians and 24% chief physicians). MRI was considered in 31% in vignette 1 and 65% in vignette 2. For pain management, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol and metamizole were mostly used. A substantial proportion of ED physicians considered treatments with questionable benefit and/or increased risk for adverse events such as oral steroids (vignette 1, 12% and vignette 2, 19%), muscle relaxants (33% and 38%), long-acting strong opioids (25% and 33%) and spinal injections (22% and 43%). Although guidelines recommend staying active, 72% and 67% of ED physicians recommended activity restrictions.

CONCLUSION

Management of acute non-specific LBP in the ED was not in agreement with current guideline recommendations in a substantial proportion of ED physicians. Overuse of imaging studies, the use of long-acting opioids and muscle relaxants, as well as recommendations for activity and work restrictions were prevalent and may potentially be harmful.

Care for the patient with low back pain

ABSTRACT

Low back pain (LBP) continues to be one of the most common conditions leading patients to seek medical care globally. The NP is on the frontline, playing an integral role in caring for patients with LBP. Understanding the etiology of LBP is essential in the treatment.

Image-Guided Spine Interventions for Pain: Ongoing Controversies

An expanding array of image-guided spine interventions have the potential to provide immediate and effective pain relief. Innovations in spine intervention have proceeded rapidly, with clinical adoption of new techniques at times occurring before the development of bodies of evidence to establish efficacy. Although new spine interventions have been evaluated by clinical trials, acceptance of results has been hindered by controversies regarding trial methodology. This article explores controversial aspects of four categories of image-guided interventions for painful conditions: spine interventions for postdural puncture headache resulting from prior lumbar procedures, epidural steroid injections for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, interventions for facet and sacroiliac joint pain, and vertebral augmentations for compression fractures. For each intervention, we summarize the available literature, with an emphasis on persistent controversies, and discuss how current areas of disagreement and challenge may shape future research and innovation. Despite the ongoing areas of debate regarding various aspects of these procedures, effective treatments continue to emerge and show promise for aiding relief of a range of debilitating conditions.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Treatment-Related Complications in Cancer

Precision medicine is becoming increasingly common in oncology, with treatments tailored to individual patients and cancer. By integrating these underlying concepts of health care, chemotherapy and radiotherapy can be tailored to improve safety and efficacy. On the other hand, oncology treatment regimens may result in local and systemic changes and complications depending on the type of treatment. For the proper and prompt management of cancer patients, it is essential to interpret this posttreatment imaging correctly. This article aims at guiding treating physicians to be able to distinguish complications from expected posttreatment changes.

Does lumbar MRI predict degree of disability in patients with degenerative disc disease? A prospective cross-sectional study at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, North West Ethiopia, 2020

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most serious public health problem globally with substantial socioeconomic implications. Degenerative disc disease is an important cause of LBP in the elderly. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely ordered by physicians in evaluation of patients with suspected degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine. However there is no unanimous agreement in the literatures when it comes to the association of degree of disability to that of severity of lumbar MRI findings.

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess the association between degree of disability measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and findings on lumbar spine MRI in patients with degenerative disc disease at University of Gondar comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North West Ethiopia, 2020.

Methods and materials

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 72 consecutively enrolled patients with degenerative disc disease who underwent lumbar MRI scan. Degree of disability was measured using ODI questionnaire translated to local language. Association between lumbar spine MRI parameters and ODI score and category was tested using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and Chi square tests.

Results

The mean age of the study subjects was 43.81 ± 1.88 years (range 22–83 years). Forty-three (59.7%) of the study population were female. In terms of ODI category, most fell under minimal 33 (45.8%) or moderate 25 (34.7%) disability. Disc bulge (81.9%) and foraminal stenosis were the most frequent MRI abnormalities detected. ODI score showed weak correlation with grade of spinal canal stenosis. Grade of foraminal stenosis showed no correlation with ODI score.

Conclusion

The clinical relevance of MRI findings in predicting degree of disability in patients with degenerative disc disease is limited and MRI study should be sparingly ordered in evaluation of these patients particularly in resource constrained settings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00866-7.

[Imaging of the musculoskeletal system using low-field magnetic resonance imaging]

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a crucial role in musculoskeletal imaging. The high prevalence and pain-related suffering of patients pose a particular challenge concerning availability and turnover times, respectively. Low-field (≤ 1.0 T) MRI has the potential to fulfill these needs. However, during the past three decades, high field systems have increasingly replaced low field systems because of their limitations in image quality. Recent technological advancements in high-performance hard- and software promise musculoskeletal imaging with adequate quality at lower field strengths for several regions and indications.

OBJECTIVES

The goal is to provide insight into the advantages and disadvantages of low-field musculoskeletal imaging, discuss the current literature, and include our first experiences with a modern 0.55 T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review is based on research in various literature databases and our own musculoskeletal imaging experiences with a modern 0.55 T scanner.

CONCLUSION

Most publications pertaining to musculoskeletal imaging at low-field strength MRI are outdated, and studies regarding the diagnostic performance of modern low-field MRI systems are needed. These new systems may complement existing high-field systems and make MRI more accessible, even in low-income countries. From our own experience, modern low-field MRI seems to be adequate in musculoskeletal imaging, especially in acute injuries.