1
|
Williams IC, Chu CD, Coker D, Anderson K, Wilson D, Jones R, Wenzel J. Screening for Cognitive Decline by Lay Navigators: A Scoping Review. J Appl Gerontol 2025; 44:768-780. [PMID: 39438023 DOI: 10.1177/07334648241289690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Innovative ways of screening for cognitive decline are urgently needed to increase detection and access to early treatment, particularly for those at highest risk for morbidity and mortality. The aim of this scoping review was to identify how cognitive screening is conducted within primary care and other clinical settings, specifically focusing on the use of lay navigators. Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews, inclusive of collaborators' feedback, we included English-language research articles published after 2010 and identified ten articles. We found that lay navigators could effectively screen for common memory problems, provide support to patients and caregivers' needs, and deliver standardized education. Incorporating cognitive screening by lay navigators can facilitate earlier access to effective treatment, especially by those burdened by existing disparities. Future research and widespread adoption of these innovative methods may improve earlier screening and thus early detection and treatment in primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Dan Wilson
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Randy Jones
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weiner JD, Leff B, Ritchie CS. A Scoping Review of Dementia Interventions in Home-Based Primary Care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:105001. [PMID: 38663452 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.03.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Home-based primary care (HBPC) provides interdisciplinary, longitudinal, comprehensive care at home to homebound older adults. The prevalence of dementia among HBPC recipients is approximately 50%. To date, little research has been performed to determine whether dementia-specific interventions have been conducted in HBPC or their efficacy. We performed a scoping review to assess the landscape of dementia interventions in HBPC. DESIGN Systematic scoping review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Care delivery programs for patients or caregivers of patients with dementia for the purpose of improving the management of dementia in the setting of HBPC. METHODS The PRISMA-ScR protocol was followed. Literature searches were performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for articles on dementia-focused interventions implemented in HBPC. Articles were excluded if they consisted of abstracts only, were not in English, or were not dementia interventions in HBPC. RESULTS A total of 1657 unique titles and abstracts were screened. Overall, 1584 titles and abstracts were excluded, resulting in 73 full-text studies to assess for eligibility. Of these 73 full-text studies, 1 study met criteria for inclusion, an observational study assessing the implementation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) intervention in Veterans Affairs HBPC. That study found the intervention to be effective in reducing caregiver burden, with a decrease of 2 hours on duty per day, trending toward significance. Among the excluded 72 full-text studies, some studies included potentially relevant interventions that could be translated into HBPC care, including dementia interventions that targeted long-term services and supports, office-based primary care and other nonhome settings such as nursing homes, and home-based palliative care. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Despite high prevalence of dementia among homebound older adults receiving HBPC, there are a dearth of studies on HBPC-specific dementia interventions. Future studies should consider adapting and testing interventions found to be effective in other settings to HBPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Weiner
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Bruce Leff
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christine S Ritchie
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feng TL, Stoessl AJ, Harrison RA. Integrated Care in Neurology: The Current Landscape and Future Directions. Can J Neurol Sci 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38679923 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2024.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
The rising burden of neurological disorders poses significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. There has been an increasing momentum to apply integrated approaches to the management of several chronic illnesses in order to address systemic healthcare challenges and improve the quality of care for patients. The aim of this paper is to provide a narrative review of the current landscape of integrated care in neurology. We identified a growing body of research from countries around the world applying a variety of integrated care models to the treatment of common neurological conditions. Based on our findings, we discuss opportunities for further study in this area. Finally, we discuss the future of integrated care in Canada, including unique geographic, historical, and economic considerations, and the role that integrated care may play in addressing challenges we face in our current healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya L Feng
- Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - A Jon Stoessl
- Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rebecca A Harrison
- Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Griffith EE, Monin JK, Lepore M. Community-Engaged Recommendations for Empowering People Living With Dementia to be Research Collaborators. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2024; 64:gnad047. [PMID: 37061845 PMCID: PMC11491516 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
As cases of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) increase worldwide, research design has placed additional emphasis on social and behavioral factors that affect ADRD symptomatology and quality of life. Despite this, few studies have incorporated people living with ADRD as research partners. We propose 5 community-engaged recommendations for incorporating people living with ADRD into future research as full collaborators. The proposed recommendations center the experiences of people living with ADRD as crucial contributions to scientific inquiry. The guidelines are based on experiences at a 2-day "Empowering Partnerships" workshop in 2019; post workshop activity continued through 2021 with ongoing collaborations, analysis, and reflective practice. The workshop and subsequent conversations engaged a network of people living with ADRD, informal carepartners, and researchers to collectively build their capacities to partner in all aspects of person-centered research. To empower people living with ADRD as research partners, we recommend that research teams (a) create a flexible schedule of communication and/or meetings to accommodate a wide range of ADRD symptoms, (b) generate team-specific communication strategies/guidelines, (c) incorporate lived experiences of people living with ADRD into research protocols, (d) involve people living with ADRD in all aspects of a project, beginning in the developmental stages, and (e) incorporate skilled facilitators to facilitate communication between stakeholder groups. This multi-vocal approach to research will diversify ADRD research and ensure that projects align with the priorities and capacities of principal stakeholders by incorporating individuals with a wide range of cognitive capabilities that more fully represent the diversity of ADRD experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric E Griffith
- Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joan K Monin
- Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael Lepore
- Department of Organizational Systems and Adult Health, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen J, Buchongo P, Spencer MRT, Reynolds CF. An HIT-Supported Care Coordination Framework for Reducing Structural Racism and Discrimination for Patients With ADRD. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 30:1171-1179. [PMID: 35659469 PMCID: PMC11402329 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Black and Latinx Americans are disproportionately at greater risk for having Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) than White Americans. Such differences in risk for ADRD are arguably explained through health disparities, social inequities, and historical policies. Structural racism and discrimination (SRD), defined as "macro-level conditions that limit opportunities, resources, and well-being of less privileged groups," have been linked with common comorbidities of ADRD, including hypertension, obesity, diabetes, depression. Given the historical impact of SRD-including discriminatory housing policies resulting in racial residential segregation that has been shown to limit access to education, employment, and healthcare-Black and Latinx populations with ADRD are directly or indirectly negatively affected by SRD in terms of access, quality and cost for healthcare. Emerging studies have brought to light the value of structural-level hospital and public health collaboration on care coordination for improving healthcare quality and access, and thus could serve as a macro-level mechanism for addressing disparities for minoritized racial and ethnic populations with ADRD. This paper presents a conceptual framework delineating how care coordination can successfully be achieved through health information technology (HIT) systems and ultimately address SRD. To address health inequities, it is therefore critical that policy initiatives invest in HIT capacities and infrastructures to promote care coordination, identify patient needs and preferences, and promote engagement of patients with ADRD and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Chen
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park (JC, PB, MRTS), MD; The Hospital and Public Health InterdisciPlinarY Research (HAPPY) Lab, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park (JC, PB, MRTS), MD.
| | - Portia Buchongo
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park (JC, PB, MRTS), MD; The Hospital and Public Health InterdisciPlinarY Research (HAPPY) Lab, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park (JC, PB, MRTS), MD
| | - Merianne Rose T Spencer
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park (JC, PB, MRTS), MD; The Hospital and Public Health InterdisciPlinarY Research (HAPPY) Lab, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park (JC, PB, MRTS), MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Borson S. Perspective on Goldfarb et al., Design and Development of a Community-Based, Interdisciplinary, Collaborative Dementia Care Program. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 30:661-663. [PMID: 35067418 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Borson
- Department of Clinical Family Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Professor Emerita of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses consumers' and primary care physicians' perspectives on awareness, diagnosis and treatment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), including MCI due to Alzheimer's disease. An estimated 6.5 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available. Alzheimer's disease was officially listed as the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States in 2019 and the seventh-leading cause of death in 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 16 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2021. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $271.6 billion in 2021. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Members of the dementia care workforce have also been affected by COVID-19. As essential care workers, some have opted to change jobs to protect their own health and the health of their families. However, this occurs at a time when more members of the dementia care workforce are needed. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2022 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $321 billion. A recent survey commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association revealed several barriers to consumers' understanding of MCI. The survey showed low awareness of MCI among Americans, a reluctance among Americans to see their doctor after noticing MCI symptoms, and persistent challenges for primary care physicians in diagnosing MCI. Survey results indicate the need to improve MCI awareness and diagnosis, especially in underserved communities, and to encourage greater participation in MCI-related clinical trials.
Collapse
|