Significance and Potential Role of Eosinophils in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Neutrophilic inflammation in bronchiectasis

Noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, hereafter referred to as bronchiectasis, is a chronic, progressive lung disease that can affect people of all ages. Patients with clinically significant bronchiectasis have chronic cough and sputum production, as well as recurrent respiratory infections, fatigue and impaired health-related quality of life. The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis has been described as a vicious vortex of chronic inflammation, recurring airway infection, impaired mucociliary clearance and progressive lung damage that promotes the development and progression of the disease. This review describes the pivotal role of neutrophil-driven inflammation in the pathogenesis and progression of bronchiectasis. Delayed neutrophil apoptosis and increased necrosis enhance dysregulated inflammation in bronchiectasis and failure to resolve this contributes to chronic, sustained inflammation. The excessive release of neutrophil serine proteases, such as neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G and proteinase 3, promotes a protease-antiprotease imbalance that correlates with increased inflammation in bronchiectasis and contributes to disease progression. While there are currently no licensed therapies to treat bronchiectasis, this review will explore the evolving evidence for neutrophilic inflammation as a novel treatment target with meaningful clinical benefits.

Challenges in treating patients with comorbid asthma and bronchiectasis

The management of patients with overlapping asthma and bronchiectasis requires a tailored approach, starting with a comprehensive assessment of the patient's clinical profile, including the severity of asthma and the extent of bronchiectasis. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are often recommended, but their use should be carefully monitored because of the risk of increased infection. If asthma is well controlled and bronchiectasis remains stable, a gradual reduction in the dose of ICS may be considered. Adjunctive therapies such as macrolides, which have anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects, or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) may be beneficial. However, LTRAs should be used with caution in patients with bronchiectasis. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), especially in combination with ICS and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA), can improve bronchodilation and reduce inflammation. Although triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) is promising, its efficacy in bronchiectasis has not yet been confirmed by randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Ongoing monitoring is essential to adjust treatment as the patient's condition evolves. Preventive measures, including vaccination and regular sputum cultures, are important to minimize the risk of infection. Further research and RCTs are needed to better understand the role of dual bronchodilators and triple therapy in the management of overlapping asthma-bronchiectasis.

Association of asthma and bronchiectasis: Mendelian randomization analyses and observational study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that asthma is closely associated with bronchiectasis, however, the causal relationship between asthma and bronchiectasis has not been investigated in depth. Therefore, this study aims to explore the causal relationship and to identify potential factors that mediate between these two diseases.

METHOD

All the necessary summarized information were obtained from publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS). Two-sample Mendelian randomization (two-sample MR) was employed to explore the causal relationship between asthma and bronchiectasis, with an additional dataset used for validation. Heterogeneity and pleiotropy analyses were utilized to verify the robustness of the results. Subsequently, mediation MR analyses were performed to identify potential mediating factors. Lastly, a retrospective observational study was conducted to validate the findings.

RESULT

Preliminary inverse-variance weighted (IVW) results indicated there was a causal effect of asthma on bronchiectasis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.228, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.077-1.400, P = 0.002). Repetition validation yielded a consistent result. Mediation MR analysis demonstrated that the presence of nasal polyps (OR = 1.063, 95% CI: 1.015-1.113, mediation ratio = 30.492%, P = 0.009), acute sinusitis (OR = 1.062, 95% CI: 1.009-1.118, mediation ratio = 30.157%, P = 0.018), chronic sinusitis (OR = 1.085, 95% CI: 1.024-1.150, mediation ratio = 40.677%, P = 0.005), and peripheral eosinophil counts (OR = 1.013, 95% CI: 1.000-1.026, mediation ratio = 6.514%, P = 0.042) served as significant mediators in the occurrence and development of bronchiectasis induced by asthma. Furthermore, a retrospective observational study observed that bronchiectasis patients with asthma had a higher prevalence of sinusitis (5.043% vs 2.971%, P < 0.001), nasal polyps (0.536% vs 0.152%, P < 0.001), and rhinitis (13.197% vs 1.860%, P < 0.001). The ratio (1.950 (0.500, 5.600) vs 1.500 (0.500, 2.600), P = 0.006) and counts (0.125 (0.040, 0.363) vs 0.090 (0.030, 0.160), P < 0.001) of peripheral blood eosinophils were also elevated in bronchiectasis patients with asthma.

CONCLUSION

The MR analysis uncovered a notable genetic association between asthma and bronchiectasis, which was partially mediated by sinusitis, nasal polyps, and eosinophils. A subsequent retrospective study provided further evidence by demonstrating that bronchiectasis patients with asthma had a higher prevalence of sinusitis, nasal polyps, an elevated proportion of eosinophils, and higher eosinophil counts.

Type 2 Biomarkers and Their Clinical Implications in Bronchiectasis: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Bronchiectasis is predominantly marked by neutrophilic inflammation. The relevance of type 2 biomarkers in disease severity and exacerbation risk is poorly understood. This study explores the clinical significance of these biomarkers in bronchiectasis patients.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional cohort study, bronchiectasis patients, excluding those with asthma or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, underwent clinical and radiological evaluations. Bronchoalveolar lavage samples were analyzed for cytokines and microbiology. Blood eosinophil count (BEC), serum total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were measured during stable disease states. Positive type 2 biomarkers were defined by established thresholds for BEC, total IgE, and FeNO.

RESULTS

Among 130 patients, 15.3% demonstrated BEC ≥ 300 cells/μL, 26.1% showed elevated FeNO ≥ 25 ppb, and 36.9% had high serum total IgE ≥ 75 kU/L. Approximately 60% had at least one positive type 2 biomarker. The impact on clinical characteristics and disease severity was variable, highlighting BEC and FeNO as reflective of different facets of disease severity and exacerbation risk. The combination of low BEC with high FeNO appeared to indicate a lower risk of exacerbation. However, Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR ≥ 3.0) were identified as more significant predictors of exacerbation frequency, independent of type 2 biomarker presence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscores the distinct roles of type 2 biomarkers, highlighting BEC and FeNO, in bronchiectasis for assessing disease severity and predicting exacerbation risk. It advocates for a multi-biomarker strategy, incorporating these with microbiological and clinical assessments, for comprehensive patient management.

Eosinophilic Bronchiectasis: Prevalence, Severity, and Associated Features-A Cohort Study

Background: Bronchiectasis (BE) has been traditionally associated with neutrophilic inflammation, but eosinophilic bronchiectasis (EB) has recently emerged. Data about prevalence, clinical features, and disease severity are lacking. This study aimed to assess the EB prevalence, compare EB with non-EB, evaluate the Type-2 (T2) high endotype in BE (T2-high EB) versus non-T2-high EB, and identify EB predictors. Methods: We conducted a prospective study involving 153 BE patients. The data collected included clinical, radiological, and microbiological findings. BE severity was assessed using the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), FACED and E-FACED scores, and the bronchiectasis etiology and comorbidity index (BACI). EB was defined as a blood eosinophil count (BEC) ≥ 300 cells/μL, and T2-high EB as BEC ≥ 300 cells/μL with fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ≥ 25 ppb. Results: Prevalence was 27% for EB and 20% for T2-high EB. EB patients exhibited poorer lung function and more severe radiologic features, with significantly higher severity scores [BSI, FACED, E-FACED, BACI (p < 0.05)], and a higher median exacerbation rate [4 (2-5) in EB vs. 2 (1-4) in non-EB, p = 0.0002], compared with non-EB patients. T2-high EB patients showed higher severity scores [BSI, FACED, E-FACED (p < 0.05)], as well as worse lung function parameters [FEV1%, FVC%, FEF 25-75% (p < 0.05)] compared with non-T2-high EB patients. In our study, patients with EB exhibited notably worsened lung function and higher BE severity scores compared with their non-EB counterparts, with exacerbations playing a major role in these differences. We found statistically significant positive correlations between BEC and disease severity scores, such as BSI, FACED, and mMRC, as well as an inverse relationship with pulmonary function. The likelihood of EB being present was significantly higher in association with mMRC ≥ 1 (OR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.26-5.64), exacerbations/year ≥ 1 (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.0-1.63), and chronic PA colonization (OR = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.08-15.8). Conclusions: EB is a distinct endotype. Dyspnea, exacerbations, and PA colonization may be predictive of EB, emphasizing the importance of early detection for improved outcomes. BEC could serve as a useful biomarker of disease severity to consider when diagnosing EB.

[Bronchiectasis not due to cystic fibrosis]

Bronchiectasis is a clinical-radiological condition composed of irreversible bronchial dilation due to inflammation and infection of the airways, which causes respiratory symptoms, usually productive cough and infectious exacerbations. Bronchiectasis can have multiple causes, both pulmonary and extrapulmonary, and its clinical presentation is very heterogenous. Its prevalence is unknown, although up to 35-50% of severe COPD and 25% of severe asthma present them, so their underdiagnosis is evident. Chronic bacterial bronchial infection is common, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the pathogen that has been found to imply a worse prognosis. Treatment of bronchiectasis has three fundamental characteristics: it must be multidisciplinary (involvement of several specialties), pyramidal (from primary care to the most specialized units) and multidimensional (management of all aspects that make up the disease).

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the airway microbiome: A review for clinicians

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex heterogeneous disease characterized by progressive airflow limitation and chronic inflammation. The progressive development and long-term repeated acute exacerbation of COPD make many patients still unable to control the deterioration of the disease after active treatment, and even eventually lead to death. An increasing number of studies have shown that the occurrence and development of COPD are closely related to the composition and changes of airway microbiome. This article reviews the interaction between COPD and airway microbiome, the potential mechanisms of interaction, and the treatment methods related to microbiome. We elaborated the internal correlation between airway microbiome and different stages of COPD, inflammatory endotypes, glucocorticoid and antibiotic treatment, analyze the pathophysiological mechanisms such as the "vicious cycle" hypothesis, abnormal inflammation-immune response of the host and the "natural selection" of COPD to airway microbiome, introduce the treatment of COPD related to microbiome and emphasize the predictive value of airway microbiome for the progression, exacerbation and prognosis of COPD, as well as the guiding role for clinical management of patients, in order to provide a new perspective for exploring the pathogenesis of COPD, and also provide clues and guidance for finding new treatment targets.

Elevated Eosinophil Counts in Acute Exacerbations of Bronchiectasis: Unveiling a Distinct Clinical Phenotype

BACKGROUND

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by bronchial dilation. However, the significance of elevated eosinophil counts in acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included 169 hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Based on blood eosinophil levels, patients were categorized into eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic bronchiectasis groups. Various clinical variables, including lung function, comorbidities and clinical features were collected for analysis. The study aimed to examine the differences between these groups and their clinical phenotypes.

RESULTS

Eosinophilic bronchiectasis (EB) was present in approximately 22% of all hospitalized patients with bronchiectasis, and it was more prevalent among male smokers (P < 0.01). EB exhibited greater severity of bronchiectasis, including worse airway obstruction, higher scores in the E-FACED (FACED combined with exacerbations) and bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), a high glucocorticoids medication possession ratio, and increased hospitalization cost (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Furthermore, we observed a significant positive correlation between blood eosinophil count and both sputum eosinophils (r = 0.49, P < 0.01) and serum total immunoglobulin E levels (r = 0.21, P < 0.05). Additional analysis revealed that patients with EB had a higher frequency of shortness of breath (P < 0.05), were more likely to have comorbid sinusitis (P < 0.01), and exhibited a greater number of lung segments affected by bronchiectasis (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that EB presents a distinct pattern of bronchiectasis features, confirming the notion that it is a specific phenotype.

Bronchiectasis-COPD Overlap Syndrome: Role of Peripheral Eosinophil Count and Inhaled Corticosteroid Treatment

Both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis are highly prevalent diseases. In both cases, inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) are associated with a decrease in exacerbations in patients with a high peripheral blood eosinophil count (BEC), but it is still not known what occurs in bronchiectasis-COPD overlap syndrome (BCOS). The present study aimed to assess the effect of ICs on various outcomes in patients with BCOS, according to BEC values. We undertook a post-hoc analysis of a cohort of 201 GOLD II-IV COPD patients with a long-term follow-up (median 74 [IQR: 40-106] months). All participants underwent computerized tomography and 115 (57.2%) had confirmed BCOS. A standardized clinical protocol was followed and two sputum samples were collected at each medical visit (every 3-6 months), whenever possible. During follow-up, there were 68 deaths (59.1%), and the mean rate of exacerbations and hospitalizations per year was 1.42 (1.2) and 0.57 (0.83), respectively. A total of 44.3% of the patients presented at least one pneumonic episode per year. The mean value of eosinophils was 402 (112) eosinophils/µL, with 27 (23.5%), 63 (54.8%), and 25 patients (21.7%) presenting, respectively, less than 100, 101-300, and more than 300 eosinophils/µL. A total of 84 patients (73.1%) took ICs. The higher the BEC, the higher the annual rate of exacerbations and hospitalizations. Patients with less than 100 eosinophils/µL presented more infectious events (incident exacerbations, pneumonic episodes, and chronic bronchial infection via pathogenic bacteria). Only those patients with eosinophilia (>300 eosinophils/µL) treated with ICs decreased the number (1.77 (1.2) vs. 1.08 (0.6), p < 0.001) and the severity (0.67 (0.8) vs. 0.35 (0.5), p = 0.011) of exacerbations, without any changes in the other infectious outcomes or mortality. In conclusion, ICs treatment in patients with BCOS with increased BEC decreased the number and severity of incident exacerbations without any negative influence on other infectious outcomes (incidence of pneumonia or chronic bronchial infection).

The U-Shaped Relationship Between Eosinophil Count and Bronchiectasis Severity: The Effect of Inhaled Corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Although a proven relationship exists between the blood eosinophil count (BEC) and the severity of both asthma and COPD, its relationship with bronchiectasis has not been well established. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between BEC and the number and severity of exacerbations, and patients' responses to inhaled corticosteroid (IC) treatment in bronchiectasis RESEARCH QUESTION: Does an association exist among BEC, the number of exacerbations and severity of bronchiectasis, and IC treatment?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a multicenter (43 centers) prospective observational study derived from the Spanish Bronchiectasis Registry. Patients with proven bronchiectasis and a known BEC were included, whereas those with asthma or antieosinophilic treatments were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups according to the BEC at the time of inclusion in the study in a steady-state situation: (1) eosinopenic bronchiectasis (< 50 eosinophils/μL), (2) low number of eosinophils (51-100/μL), (3) normal number of eosinophils (101-300/μL), and (4) eosinophilic bronchiectasis (> 300 eosinophils/μL).

RESULTS

Nine hundred twenty-eight patients finally were included: 123 patients (13.3%) with < 50 eosinophils/μL (eosinopenic group), 164 patients (17.7%) with 50-100 eosinophils/μL, 488 patients (52.6%) with 101-300 eosinophils/μL, and 153 patients (16.5%) with > 300 eosinophils/μL (eosinophilic group). BEC showed a significant U-shaped relationship with severity, exacerbations, lung function, microbiologic profile, and IC treatment (these being higher in the eosinopenic group compared with the eosinophilic group). IC treatment significantly decreased the number and severity of exacerbations only in the group of bronchiectasis patients with > 300 eosinophils/μL.

INTERPRETATION

A significant U-shaped relationship was found between BEC and severity and exacerbations in bronchiectasis that was more pronounced in the eosinopenic group. IC treatment decreased the number and severity of exacerbations only in the eosinophilic group.

Real-World Effectiveness of IL-5/5Ra Targeted Biologics in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma With Comorbid Bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a common comorbidity in patients with asthma and is associated with increased disease severity. In patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, biologics targeting IL-5/5Ra have beneficial effects on oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and exacerbation frequency. However, how coexisting bronchiectasis affects the response to such treatments is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of anti-IL-5/5Ra therapy in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and comorbid bronchiectasis on exacerbation frequency and daily maintenance and cumulative OCS dose.

METHODS

This real-world study evaluated data from 97 adults with severe eosinophilic asthma and computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis from the Dutch Severe Asthma Registry, who initiated anti-IL5/5Ra biologics (mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab) and had follow-up data for 12 months or greater. The analysis was performed for the total population and subgroups with or without maintenance OCS use.

RESULTS

Anti-IL-5/5Ra therapy significantly reduced exacerbation frequency in patients with maintenance OCS use as well as in those without it. In the year before biologic initiation, 74.5% of all patients had two or more exacerbations, which decreased to 22.1% in the follow-up year (P < .001). The proportion of patients on maintenance OCS decreased from 47% to 30% (P < .001), and in the OCS-dependent patients (n = 45) maintenance OCS dose decreased from median (interquartile range) of 10.0 mg/d (5-15 mg/d) to 2.5 mg/d (0-5 mg/d) after 1 year (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study shows that anti-IL-5/5Ra therapy reduces exacerbation frequency and daily maintenance as well as the cumulative OCS dose in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and comorbid bronchiectasis. Although it is an exclusion criterion in phase 3 trials, comorbid bronchiectasis should not preclude anti-IL-5/5Ra therapy in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Benralizumab Effectiveness in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma with Co-Presence of Bronchiectasis: A Real-World Multicentre Observational Study

Introduction: The co-presence of bronchiectasis (BE) in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is common. Data about the effectiveness of benralizumab in patients with SEA and BE (SEA + BE) are lacking. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of benralizumab and remission rates in patients with SEA compared to SEA + BE, also according to BE severity. Methods: We conducted a multicentre observational study, including patients with SEA who underwent chest high-resolution computed tomography at baseline. The Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) was used to assess BE severity. Clinical and functional characteristics were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Results: We included 74 patients with SEA treated with benralizumab, of which 35 (47.2%) showed the co-presence of bronchiectasis (SEA + BE) with a median BSI of 9 (7-11). Overall, benralizumab significantly improved the annual exacerbation rate (p < 0.0001), oral corticosteroids (OCS) consumption (p < 0.0001) and lung function (p < 0.01). After 12 months, significant differences were found between SEA and SEA + BE cohorts in the number of exacerbation-free patients [64.1% vs. 20%, OR 0.14 (95% CI 0.05-0.40), p < 0.0001], the proportion of OCS withdrawal [-92.6% vs. -48.6, p = 0.0003], and the daily dose of OCS [-5 mg (0 to -12.5) vs. -12.5 mg (-7.5 to -20), p = 0.0112]. Remission (zero exacerbations + zero OCS) was achieved more frequently in the SEA cohort [66.7% vs. 14.3%, OR 0.08 (95% CI 0.03-0.27), p < 0.0001]. Changes in FEV₁% and FEF_25-75% were inversely correlated with BSI (r = -0.36, p = 0.0448 and r = -0.41, p = 0.0191, respectively). Conclusions: These data suggest that benralizumab exerts beneficial effects in SEA with or without BE, although the former achieved less OCS sparing and fewer respiratory-function improvements.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for bronchiectasis in adults

INTRODUCTION

Bronchiectasis has become a growing concern of chronic airway disease because of the enormous socioeconomic burden. Four cardinal interdependent components - impaired airway defense, recurrent airway infections, inflammatory response, and airway damage, in conjunction with the underlying etiology, have collectively played a role in modulating the vicious vortex of the pathogenesis and progression of bronchiectasis. Current pharmacotherapy aims to target at these aspects to break the vicious vortex.

AREAS COVERED

The authors retrieve and review, in MEDLINE, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov registry, the studies about pharmacotherapy for bronchiectasis from these aspects: antibiotics, mucoactive medications, bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drug, and etiological treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Future drug development and clinical trials of bronchiectasis need to pay more attention to the different phenotypes or endotypes of bronchiectasis. There is a need for the development of novel inhaled antibiotics that could reduce bacterial loads, improve quality-of-life, and decrease exacerbation risks. More efforts are needed to explore the next-generation neutrophil-targeted therapeutic drugs that are expected to ameliorate respiratory symptom burden, reduce exacerbation risks, and hinder airway destruction in bronchiectasis.

Inhaled Corticosteroids and Bronchiectasis: Friend or Foe?

The three most common chronic inflammatory airway diseases are asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and bronchiectasis [...].

Simultaneous evaluation of the fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil count of T2-high endotype in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

OBJECTIVE

Recently, a type 2 inflammation (T2) high endotype in bronchiectasis was identified. The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil count (BEC) are recognized as representative biomarkers of T2 inflammation. Herein, we investigate the clinical characteristics of T2-high endotype in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis patients classified by FeNO and BEC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 164 bronchiectasis patients treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from December 2017 to July 2022. Clinical characteristics were analyzed after classifying patients into four groups according to T2 inflammation biomarkers (FeNO ≥25 ppb; BEC ≥200/µL).

RESULTS

Among the 164 bronchiectasis patients, 35.3% (58/164) presented with high FeNO, 30.5% (50/164) presented with high BEC, and 10.4% (17/164) had high FeNO and BEC. Patients with high FeNO and low BEC presented with better lung function, fewer affected lobes, and lower dyspnea prevalence compared with the three other groups. Moreover, decreased FeNO, instead of decreased BEC, is revealed to be an independent predictor for disease severity and airflow obstruction in bronchiectasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous evaluation of FeNO and BEC proposed different endotypes of bronchiectasis established that patients with low BEC and high FeNO had better lung function, fewer affected lobes, lower dyspnea prevalence, and less disease severity. This result will contribute to a more comprehensive assessment of the disease severity and lead to more precise treatment of T2 inflammation in bronchiectasis patients.