Association Between Serum Total IgE Levels and Clinical Response to Omalizumab for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical phenotypes and biomarkers in chronic urticaria

The medical field faces considerable challenges in treating chronic urticaria (CU), which includes both chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria, owing to its varied nature. The complexity of this condition stems from multiple factors: varying disease mechanisms, different ways in which symptoms manifest, and inconsistent treatment outcomes. Although both forms of CU display hives that persist beyond six weeks, they have distinct causes and progression patterns. This study examines CSU specifically, exploring its various manifestations and associated biological indicators. Currently, there is a pressing need to identify reliable, accessible biomarkers for CSU to enhance diagnosis and develop targeted treatments. Better insights into how specific disease patterns are related to biological markers would significantly improve our understanding of CSU development and enhance patient treatment approaches.

Endotypes of chronic spontaneous urticaria and angioedema

The current understanding of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) suggests that a complex network of inflammatory pathways is involved in its pathogenesis. Recent development highlighted autoimmunity as one of the key pathogenic mechanisms of CSU. Two endotypes, type I autoallergic (associated with IgE antibodies against autoantigens) and type IIb autoimmune (mediated by IgG autoantibodies against IgE or its high-affinity receptor [FcεRI]), have been characterized. A subpopulation of the patients has an overlap of the 2 endotypes. About 10% of patients with CSU present with only angioedema. Patients with isolated mast cell-mediated angioedema have distinct clinical and demographic features and should be distinguished from bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Multiple potential biomarkers such as total IgE level and IgG anti-thyroid peroxidase have been identified and, together with the corresponding endotypes, have been linked to disease severity, duration, and response to treatments. Currently, the use of these biomarkers is limited in clinical settings given the few options of therapy. However, with the advent of novel treatments, endotyping CSU might help with tailoring treatment approaches.

Endotypes, phenotypes, and biomarkers in chronic spontaneous urticaria: Evolving toward personalized medicine

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an inflammatory disorder that manifests with hives, angioedema, or both and lasts more than or equal to 6 weeks. Although certain elements of CSU pathogenesis are well defined, others remain unclear. We discuss our current understanding of the underlying CSU endotypes, distinct clinical phenotypes, and predictive biomarkers. It is increasingly recognized that CSU comprises a spectrum of different underlying pathogenic mechanisms and distinct clinical presentations. Broadly, 2 endotypes that drive CSU pathogenesis have been identified, namely type I (autoallergic) and type IIb (autoimmune). However, a subpopulation shows evidence of both types, and some patients show evidence of neither. Multiple identified biomarkers have been associated with these endotypes or with disease features, such as CSU severity and duration. There is a lack of connectivity among the identified biomarkers, genetic risk loci, phenotypes, and corresponding endotypes, and each of these is frequently considered independently of the others. These identifiable features also have been associated with response, or lack thereof, to available therapies. Future investigations should optimize the endotyping of CSU using point-of-care, noninvasive, accessible biomarkers and assess the differences in response to therapy. With multiple treatments in late-stage development, establishing clearly defined CSU endotypes will facilitate future treatment decision-making and tailored treatment approaches and will inform optimal trial design.

Update on the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a mast cell-mediated skin disease that presents with wheals, angioedema, or both for more than 6 weeks. Less than 10% of patients have complete control of their CSU (the main goal of CSU treatment) with second generation H1-antihistamines, the first-line treatment. About 70% of patients with antihistamine-refractory CSU do not reach complete control with omalizumab, the second-line treatment. Novel therapies are especially needed for patients with mast cell-activating immunoglobulin (Ig)G autoantibodies (autoimmune CSU) associated with nonresponse or late response to omalizumab. Furthermore, there is a lack of disease-modifying treatments that induce long-term CSU remission after drug withdrawal. Several emerging treatments can address these unmet needs including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, e.g., remibrutinib and rilzabrutinib; anti-KIT monoclonal antibodies, e.g., barzolvolimab; and anti-cytokine therapies, e.g., dupilumab. In clinical trials, 30-31%, 28-32%, and 38-51% of patients with CSU showed complete response to treatment with dupilumab (phase 3, week 24), remibrutinib (phase 3, week 24), and barzolvolimab (phase 2, week 12), respectively. The most common adverse events were injection site reactions for dupilumab (12%), respiratory tract infections (11%), headache (6%), and petechiae (4%) for remibrutinib and changes in hair color (14%), neutropenia / decreased neutrophil count (9%) and skin hypopigmentation (1%) for barzolvolimab. This review provides an update on the current state of development of treatments for CSU.

A retrospective analysis of factors influencing response to omalizumab treatment in Indian patients with antihistamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) presents as a persistent and distressing condition, with varying treatment responses. Omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, has shown efficacy in managing antihistamine (AH1)-refractory CSU, but its varied response patterns and associated factors remain understudied, particularly in India.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study involving 81 antihistamine-resistant CSU patients treated with omalizumab at a tertiary care center in Northern India between 2018 and 2023. Baseline characteristics, treatment response, and adverse effects were analyzed. Patients were categorized into various response groups based on treatment timelines and biomarker correlations.

Results

We observed 65% achieved symptom cessation (group 1) following a single omalizumab dose, while 21% responded between second and third doses (group 2). A subset (7.4%) necessitated increased dosing frequency (group 3) for symptom control. Additionally, 6.2% showed persistent symptoms despite increased dosing frequency (group 4), exhibiting distinctive biomarker profiles indicative of an autoimmune endotype. Notably, 27.1% experienced exacerbations during treatment, emphasizing the need for tailored management approaches and response expectations.

Conclusion

Omalizumab demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of AH1-refractory CSU, with a good safety profile. This study highlights the complexity of treatment response to omalizumab and the potential utility of biomarkers in guiding personalized therapeutic strategies. Further research into biomarker-based endotypes is warranted to optimize CSU management.

Utility of serum biomarkers in real-world practice for predicting response to omalizumab therapy in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background

Omalizumab (OMA), a recombinant humanized IgG monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, is approved for treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to second-generation H1-antihistamine (SGAH) therapy. However, currently, there are no validated serum biomarkers to reliably predict response to OMA treatment.

Objective

We explored the real-world clinical utility of using serum biomarkers for predicting response to OMA for CSU patients with disease refractory to high-dose SGAH therapy.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective chart review of CSU patients treated with OMA enrolled patients who had at their initial evaluation collection of a basophil histamine release assay for detecting IgG antibodies targeting FcεR1α subunit before starting OMA treatment. In addition, total IgE, IgG-anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO), C-reactive protein, and absolute eosinophil count, if available, were analyzed as predictors for OMA response. The validated Outcome and Assessment Information Set Database (OASIS-D) rating system was used to assess responsiveness to OMA.

Results

High levels of IgG-anti-TPO were significantly associated with a poor response to OMA. However, basophil histamine release assay, total IgE, C-reactive protein, and absolute eosinophil count, as well as IgG-anti-TPO/total IgE ratios, were not predictive of a response to OMA therapy.

Conclusions

This real-world study confirms previous reports that a high IgG-anti-TPO level is a reliable predictor of poor response to OMA. However, better validation of basophil histamine release assay and other immunoassays that measure IgG antibodies to FcεR1α subunit are required before they can be recommended as predictors for OMA response. Whether any of these biomarkers are relevant for predicting response to novel advanced therapeutics under current development requires further investigation.

Prognosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria with an inadequate response to omalizumab

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) exhibits notable responsiveness to omalizumab (OMA). The prognosis and subsequent therapeutic strategies warrant comprehensive exploration in cases exhibiting inadequate responses to OMA.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis to investigate the 12-month prognosis of patients inadequately responding to three injections of OMA. The endpoints encompassed identifying predictive factors for a favorable prognosis and assessing interventions related to an ameliorated prognostic outlook.

RESULTS

The study involved 48 patients who met the inclusion criteria. After three OMA administrations, therapeutic interventions included the continuation of OMA in 34 patients, systemic corticosteroids in seven patients, and immunosuppressants in 12 patients. After 12 months, 28 of the 48 patients exhibited a good prognosis, whereas the remaining 20 displayed a less favorable prognosis. Good prognostic determinants encompassed the duration of CSU within 51 weeks, the presence of angioedema, IgE levels ≤100 IU/mL pre-OMA, blood eosinophil counts ≥100/mm3 post-OMA, and urticaria control test (UCT) scores ≥5 pre-OMA and ≥6 post-OMA. Following the third OMA injection, the implementation of immunosuppressants presented an association with a good prognosis, while the employment of systemic corticosteroids correlated with an unfavorable prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of patients inadequately responding to OMA achieved a good prognosis 12 months later. Several clinical variables appear to be predictive of prognosis, and certain therapeutic agents can be associated with prognostic outcomes.

IgE as a predictor to omalizumab response in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

This multicenter study aimed to explore whether baseline total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels could predict omalizumab response in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients. Refractory CSU patients, treated with omalizumab after failing second-generation H1-antihistamines, were analyzed retrospectively across seven centers in Brazil. The study assessed total IgE levels at baseline, comparing responders to non-responders and considering complete and partial responses. The results showed a significant reduction in CSU symptoms post-treatment. Non-responders had lower baseline IgE levels. A sensitivity of 67.8% and specificity of 93.3% for predicting a response were found at an IgE level of 59.5 IU/ml. Similar values were observed for complete responders. Notably, a baseline IgE level lower than 59.5 IU/ml may indicate late responders. The study underscores the potential of baseline IgE levels as a predictive biomarker for omalizumab response in CSU patients. Further research, incorporating diverse populations and analyzing response variables, is warranted to validate these findings.

Managing Urticarial Vasculitis: A Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm Based on Expert Consensus

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare and difficult-to-treat, small-vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis presenting with recurrent long-lasting wheals. So far, no guidelines and treatment algorithms exist that could help clinicians with the management of UV. In this review, we describe evidence on systemic treatments used for UV and propose a clinical decision-making algorithm for UV management based on the Urticarial Vasculitis Activity Score assessed for 7 days (UVAS7). Patients with occasional UV-like urticarial lesions and patients with UV with skin-limited manifestations and/or mild arthralgia/malaise (total UVAS7 ≤7 of 70) can be initially treated using the step-wise algorithm for chronic urticaria including second-generation H1-antihistamines, omalizumab, and cyclosporine A. Patients with UV with more severe symptoms (UVAS7 >7), especially those with hypocomplementemic UV, may require a multidisciplinary approach, particularly if underlying diseases, for example, systemic lupus erythematosus, cancer, or infection, are present. Immunomodulatory therapy is based on clinical signs and symptoms, and the drug availability and safety profile, and includes systemic corticosteroids, dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, anti-interleukin-1 agents, and other therapies. The level of evidence for all UV treatments is low. Prospective studies with current and novel drugs are needed and could provide further insights into UV pathogenesis and treatment.

Biological drugs for the treatment of children with chronic spontaneous urticaria

INTRODUCTION

There is a significant prevalence of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in children across the globe. Some children with CSU do not achieve disease control with first-line antihistamine treatment and may need anti-IgE therapy with omalizumab. Recently, several novel treatment options, including dupilumab and BTK inhibitors, showed promising results in the treatment of antihistamine-refractory CSU in adults. However, information regarding their use in pediatric CSU is scarce, and most data is extrapolated from adult studies.

AREAS COVERED

The review highlights the evidence on the use of mAbs and small-molecule inhibitors in pediatric CSU and aims to bridge the knowledge gaps and highlight unmet needs.

EXPERT OPINION

Omalizumab is approved for allergic asthma patients aged ≥6 years, and some experience with omalizumab in children with CSU at this age has been published. However, approximately 5-10% of pediatric CSU patients may show insufficient response to omalizumab, necessitating other therapies. The available information on the off-label use of biologics other than omalizumab in children is limited to case reports. No data is available for other new therapies.

Characterization of omalizumab updosing patterns and predictive factors in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A prospective multicentric observational study

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available on the use of omalizumab (OMA) updosing since its introduction as a second-line therapy in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in 2014. Practical guidelines from health authorities are lacking, and the specific characteristics of patients requiring higher doses remain unknown. Our objectives were to characterize the patterns of OMA updosing (defined as changes in dose and/or injection intervals), to identify the predictive factors associated with updosing, and to improve CSU management.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicentric, real-life observational study, including patients diagnosed with CSU and starting OMA. The data were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 9 months. The primary endpoint was the frequency of OMA updosing at 3 months. The secondary endpoints included an analysis of updosed patients' profile, and an assessment of OMA efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

We included 153 patients. Twenty percent of patients were updosed at 3 months, and 27% in total during the 9-month follow-up. Practitioners mainly chose to increase the frequency of injections (66%). At baseline, the updosed patients were more likely to have more severe CSU (UCT < 4, p < 0.030), a lower lymphocyte count (<2000/mm3, p = 0.037), and low IgE levels (<70 UI/mL, p = 0.024). The side effects of OMA were not more frequent after updosing.

CONCLUSION

One in five patient underwent updosing within just 3 months. OMA updosing is frequent in particular in cases of severe disease and low IgE blood levels.

Dupilumab Reduces Urticaria Activity, Itch, and Hives in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Regardless of Baseline Serum Immunoglobulin E Levels

INTRODUCTION

In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 may promote mast cell activation directly via IL-4 receptor expression, or indirectly via upregulated immunoglobulin E (IgE) production. Dupilumab significantly improved CSU signs and symptoms in the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A. This analysis explores the impact of dupilumab on CSU signs and symptoms and serum IgE levels in patients from LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A with serum total IgE above and below 100 IU/mL at baseline.

METHODS

Patients with H1-antihistamine-refractory CSU received dupilumab (n = 70) or placebo (n = 68) for 24 weeks. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 in serum total IgE levels, Itch Severity Score over 7 days (ISS7), Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7), and Hives Severity Score over 7 days (HSS7) in dupilumab- or placebo-treated patients with serum total IgE above and below 100 IU/mL at baseline.

RESULTS

Dupilumab treatment significantly reduced median (interquartile range) IgE levels at week 12 [dupilumab: -31.9% (-41.9; -22.6); placebo: -6.3% (-21.3; 14.9)] and week 24 [dupilumab: -48.2% (-56.8; - 39.5); placebo: - 6.3% (-34.5; 14.8)]. Similar IgE reductions relative to baseline were observed in dupilumab-treated patients regardless of baseline IgE level. Dupilumab treatment improved ISS7, UAS7, and HSS7 over 12 and 24 weeks, regardless of baseline serum IgE level (interaction p ≥ 0.59 for all treatment by subgroup comparisons), with weak correlations (r < 0.2) observed between IgE level changes and ISS7, UAS7, and HSS7 outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab significantly improved CSU signs and symptoms and reduced serum IgE, regardless of baseline IgE levels. In the current analysis, baseline total IgE had no predictive value as a dupilumab treatment response biomarker in CSU. Downregulation of IgE, a key mediator of mast cell activation and histamine release, may at least partially explain the effectiveness of dupilumab in reducing CSU signs and symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04180488.

Efficacy of omalizumab for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid: Spanish multicentre real-world experience

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease. Most patients are older and have associated multiple comorbidities. Topical and systemic corticosteroids are considered the first-line treatment for BP, and immunosuppressants are used as steroid-sparing treatments. However, both have side-effects and contraindications, which are even more common in this older population. New treatments targeting interleukins and receptors related to BP pathogenesis have been proposed to decrease these side-effects while achieving equal or better effectiveness and response rates. Omalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets IgE and has been proposed for the treatment of BP due to the evidence that IgE autoantibodies play an essential role in BP pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for the treatment of BP.

METHODS

We carried out a multicentre, retrospective, observational study including patients diagnosed with BP who received omalizumab for ≥ 3 months from 15 tertiary hospitals in Spain. IgE levels prior to treatment were measured, and we evaluated the possible correlation with clinical response. We excluded patients treated with omalizumab for < 3 months, as we consider this duration to be insufficient for a comprehensive assessment of its efficacy. To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment, we used the percentage of body surface area improvement.

RESULTS

We included 36 patients. The vast majority had associated multiple comorbidities, and all patients had used other systemic therapies apart from corticosteroids before omalizumab. In total, 83% experienced some kind of treatment response and 42% of all patients treated achieved complete response. We did not find any correlation between higher IgE levels and a better response (P = 0.2). All patients tolerated omalizumab without reported side-effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Omalizumab is a good therapeutic alternative for BP as it provided clinical response in most patients, and nearly one-half of the cases achieved complete response. It showed no side-effects, which is crucial in older patients with BP.

Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Real-World Study on Effectiveness, Safety and Predictors of Treatment Outcome

Background

Although omalizumab has shown success in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients unresponsive to antihistamines, the exact mechanism of action and predictive markers of response remain unclear.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between baseline levels of biomarkers and clinical parameters with omalizumab response and response rate in patients with CSU.

Methods

This retrospective study included 82 adult CSU patients who received omalizumab 300mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks between January 2022 and December 2023. Treatment response was assessed using UAS7 and DLQI scores at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Responders were defined as patients achieving UAS7 < 7, with early and late responders categorized based on response within or after 4 weeks, respectively. Baseline clinical features and laboratory biomarkers were compared between responders and non-responders.

Results

The overall response rate was 71.95% (59/82), with 23 early responders and 36 late responders. Responders had significantly lower baseline UAS7 (median: 28 vs 35, P < 0.01), DLQI (median: 8 vs 15, P < 0.001), and IL-17 levels (median: 0.53 vs 1.26 pg/mL, P < 0.001) compared to non-responders. Baseline UAS7 > 31, DLQI > 9.5, and IL-17 > 0.775 pg/mL predicted non-response with sensitivities of 78.26%, 100%, and 78.26%, and specificities of 67.8%, 59.32%, and 72.88%, respectively. ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with early response (P < 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 6.09% of patients, including mild injection site reactions and transient urticaria exacerbation, not requiring treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion

This study suggests that omalizumab is an effective and safe treatment option for antihistamine-refractory CSU. Baseline UAS7, DLQI, ASST status, serum total IgE levels, and IL-17 may serve as potential predictors of omalizumab response. Notably, ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with an early response to treatment. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual patient characteristics when predicting the likelihood and timing of response to omalizumab in CSU.

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: An Update on the Evaluation and Management

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) affects 0.5% to 1% of the general population and is often managed by allergy and immunology specialists. Guidelines have evolved over the past several decades with an emphasis on decreasing extensive screening laboratory testing as they are of low-yield and cost-ineffective. The utility of biomarkers remains under investigation but total immunoglobulin E may be helpful in determining specific endotypes and response to omalizumab. Antihistamines and omalizumab remain the primary therapeutic options for CSU, but an expanding body of evidence supports the use of immunosuppressants and anti-inflammatory medications in refractory cases.

Emerging Therapeutics in Chronic Urticaria

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common and long-lasting mast cell-mediated skin disease associated with psychiatric and autoimmune comorbidities, high economic costs, and considerable impact on quality of life. Available therapies show limited efficacy in many CU patients, which may be related to distinct underlying pathophysiology. Targeted and disease-modifying treatments with higher and broader efficacy are needed and are under development for CU. These novel drugs, small molecules, and monoclonal antibodies target mast cells and their receptors, signaling pathways, or mediators and other immune cells. In this article, the authors focus on the most promising emerging therapeutics in advanced development and discuss their potential place in future management of CU.

Chronic urticaria: unmet needs, emerging drugs, and new perspectives on personalised treatment

Chronic urticaria is a common and debilitating mast cell-driven skin disease presenting with itchy wheals, angio-oedema, or both. Chronic urticaria is classified as spontaneous (without definite triggers) and inducible (with definite and subtype-specific triggers; eg, cold or pressure). Current management guidelines recommend step-up administration of second-generation H1-antihistamines to four-fold the approved dose, followed by omalizumab and ciclosporin. However, in many patients, chronic urticaria does not respond to this linear approach due to heterogeneous underlying mechanisms. A personalised endotype-based approach is emerging based on the identification of autoantibodies and other drivers of urticaria pathogenesis. Over the past decade, clinical trials have presented promising options for targeted treatment of chronic urticaria with the potential for disease modification, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-cytokine therapies, and mast cell depletion. This Therapeutics article focuses on the evidence for these novel drugs and their role in addressing an unmet need for personalised management of patients with chronic urticaria.

What can be learned from real-world data about chronic spontaneous urticaria?

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common disease with complex pathogenesis. Patients' clinical characteristics and responses to treatment vary. Objective: We aimed to investigate the role of data obtained from routinely recommended tests in predicting the response to omalizumab, the only biologic agent approved for treatment, and in defining the clinical characteristics of the patients. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who started omalizumab treatment for CSU between 2015 and 2022 at the Department of Dermatology, Pamukkale University, was conducted. Response criteria were based on the urticaria control test, and patients with a urticaria control test score <12 at 6 months were considered treatment non-responders. Eosinophil and basophil counts, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels of the patients were evaluated before treatment and at the sixth month of treatment. Results: A total of 23.1% of the patients were unresponsive to omalizumab. The response rate to the omalizumab treatment of the patients with a total IgE level ≤ 30 IU/L (n = 4 [5.7%]) was significantly lower than patients with total IgE level > 30 IU/L (n = 66 [94.3%]) (p = 0.015). The mean ± standard deviation SIRI levels were significantly higher in non-responders versus responders (1.53 ± 1.03 versus 1.15 ± 7.76; p = 0.026). Eosinophil counts positively correlated with basophil counts (r = 587; p < 0.001) and IgE levels (r = 0.290; p = 0.005) but a negative correlation was found with levels of NLR (r = -0.475; p < 0.001), SIRI (r = -0.259; p = 0.013), and SII (r = -0.285; p = 0.006). NLR levels were lower in CSU patients with atopy, than in those without atopy (1.9 ± 0.9 vs 2.9 ± 2.1, p = 0.022). Conclusion: We suggest that eosinopenia and high NLR levels are linked to autoimmune CSU. Predicting a poor response to omalizumab seems possible with total IgE levels < 30 IU/L and high SIRI levels.

Biomarkers predicting the controller dose of omalizumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials showed the efficacy of 300 mg/4 weeks of omalizumab (OMA) during 6 months in patients with severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Nevertheless, in real life, many patients require higher doses and/or longer treatment. This study assesses the real-life performance of OMA in severe CSU and identifies factors associated with the response.

METHODS

CSU patients eligible for OMA were recruited prospectively. Clinical data and a blood test were collected before OMA initiation. Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) was calculated at baseline and every 3 months during OMA treatment. CSU control was defined as UAS7 <7 points. This work was partially sponsored by OMA manufacturer.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine adults (19.1% males) with severe CSU were recruited. Median duration of CSU prior to OMA initiation was 2 years, and median severity by UAS7 at baseline was 24 points (range 10-42 points). OMA controlled 94.4% of patients, but 17.9% of responders required doses >300 mg/4 weeks. A blood basophil count >20 cells/μL (OR 13.33; 95% CI 3.32-52.63; p < .001) and the absence of hypothyroidism (OR 3.65; 95% CI 0.78-16.95; p = .099) were identified as predictive factors to achieve control with 300 mg/4 weeks. Twelve patients were able to stop OMA during the study (responders in remission, RR). RR had received OMA for a median of 29 months (12-53 months). Conversely, 32 patients had been on OMA for >29 months at the end of the study (active responders, AR). AR had received OMA for a median of 45 months (30-100 months). There were no significant differences in clinical or analytical factors between RR and AR patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Low blood basophil count and the presence of hypothyroidism might serve as biomarkers for the controller dose of OMA in severe CSU patients.

Precision Dermatology: A Review of Molecular Biomarkers and Personalized Therapies

The evolution of personalized medicine in dermatology signifies a transformative shift towards individualized treatments, driven by the integration of biomarkers. These molecular indicators serve beyond diagnostics, offering insights into disease staging, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring. Specific criteria guide biomarker selection, ensuring attributes like specificity, sensitivity, cost feasibility, stability, rapid detection, and reproducibility. This literature review, based on data from PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science, explores biomarkers in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS), Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Alopecia Areata (AA), Vitiligo, and Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU). In HS, TNF-α, IL-1β, and MMPs serve as biomarkers, influencing targeted therapies like adalimumab and anakinra. Psoriasis involves biomarkers such as TNF-α, IL-23, and HLA genes, shaping treatments like IL23 and IL17 inhibitors. AD biomarkers include ECP, IL-4, IL-13, guiding therapies like dupilumab and tralokinumab. For AA, lipocalin-2, cytokines, and genetic polymorphisms inform JAK inhibitors' use. Vitiligo biomarkers range from cytokines to genetic markers like TYR, TYRP1, guiding treatments like JAK inhibitors. CSU biomarkers encompass IgE, cytokines, and autologous serum tests, influencing therapies like omalizumab and cyclosporine. Comparing conditions, common proinflammatory markers reveal limited specificity. While some biomarkers aid diagnosis and standard treatments, others hold more scientific than clinical value. Precision medicine, driven by biomarkers, has shown success in skin malignancies. Future directions involve AI-powered algorithms, nanotechnology, and multi-omics integration for personalized dermatological care.

Total IgE as a biomarker of omalizumab response in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A meta-analysis

Background: Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is refractory to antihistamines. Total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels have emerged as a possible biomarker to predict response to omalizumab. However, the existing literature is heterogenous, with conflicting conclusions with regard to the role of total IgE levels. Objective: We sought to clarify the role of evaluating total IgE levels in patients with CSU by performing a meta-analysis on the existing literature to determine if meaningful changes exist between responders and nonresponders to omalizumab. Methods: A total of 68 unique citations were returned and screened by two independent reviewers. Editorials, reviews, and case reports were excluded, and a total of 33 original articles were identified and underwent secondary evaluation. Studies that present mean ± standard deviation total IgE levels and/or 95% confidence intervals (CI) were included, whereas studies with < 25 subjects were excluded. Three studies ultimately met these criteria. Results: We found a mean difference in total IgE levels between those who responded to omalizumab versus those without a response of 49.76 (95% CI, 7.13-92.38; p = 0.02), which demonstrated higher mean IgE values in responders compared with nonresponders. Conclusion: This study presents additional evidence that supports evaluation of total IgE levels as it pertains to response to omalizumab therapy in CSU. When considering the current evidence, it seems reasonable to consider the baseline total IgE level as a biomarker to predict the treatment response to omalizumab. Based on the existing literature, we cannot conclude at what threshold nonresponse is more likely to occur.