Anorectal malignant melanoma: extensive 45-year review and proposal for a novel staging classification

Endoscopic ultrasound features of rectal melanoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Rectal mucosal melanoma is a rare and highly aggressive disease. Common symptoms include anal pain, an anal mass, or bleeding. As such, the disease is usually detected on rectal examination of patients with other suspected anorectal diseases. However, due to its rarity and nonspecific symptoms, melanoma of the rectal mucosa is easily misdiagnosed.

CASE SUMMARY

This report describes the case of a 58-year-old female patient who presented with a history of blood in her stool for the prior one or two months, without any identifiable cause. During colonoscopy, a bulge of approximately 2.2 cm × 2.0 cm was identified. Subsequently, the patient underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to characterize the depth of invasion of the lesions. EUS suggested a hypoechoic mucosal mass with involvement of the submucosal layer and heterogeneity of the internal echoes. Following surgical intervention, the excised tissue samples were examined and confirmed to be rectal malignant melanoma. The patient recovered well with no evidence of recurrence during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This case shows that colonoscopy with EUS and pathological examination can accurately diagnose rare cases of rectal mucosal melanoma.

Successful Multidisciplinary Treatment with Laparoscopic Hepatectomy and Adjuvant Therapy for Metachronous Solitary Hepatic Metastasis after Excision of a Primary Anorectal Malignant Melanoma: A Case Report

Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is extremely rare and generally lethal, irrespective of the treatment administered. The disease is often diagnosed late, metastases being present in approximately two-thirds of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Solitary metastasis of ARMM to a distant organ is exceedingly rare. A 76-year-old woman with a history of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of an ARMM 13 months previously, was found to have a solitary liver metastasis in the follow-up computed tomography. A preoperative work-up showed no other distant metastases nor contraindication to surgery. It was therefore considered that resection was indicated. The metachronous solitary liver metastasis from an ARMM was treated by laparoscopic wedge hepatectomy of the eighth segment 18 months after excision of her primary ARMM. Adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab was initiated and continued at 6-week intervals. The patient has not exhibited any immune related Adverse Effects (irAE) during or subsequent to treatment with pembrolizmab and has now completed 12 months of adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy, having survived 33 months from the initial operation for primary ARMM, and remaining recurrence-free 14 months after hepatectomy. ARMM is extremely rare and resection of a metachronous solitary metastasis followed by adjuvant therapy has not previously been reported. We hope this case will be useful for clinicians who might treat similar patients.

Early-Stage Primary Rectal Melanoma: A Case Report

Malignant primary rectal melanomas (PRM) are rare tumors. Their diagnosis is frequently delayed as these lesions are often mistaken for benign diseases, resulting in extremely poor overall survival. Histological evaluation with special immunohistochemical (IHC) stains is often indispensable for a definitive diagnosis. The main treatment for this condition involves surgical resection. Adjuvant therapy has also been long recommended. We discuss the case of a 60-year-old woman who presented with changes in bowel habits, anal pain, and perineal burning with no bleeding. A digital rectal examination revealed a nodular mass extending 5 cm from the anal verge. Rectosigmoidoscopy demonstrated an ulcerated polypoid tumor extending 4 cm from the anal verge and over 5 cm into the lower rectum. Biopsy and IHC tests confirmed the diagnosis of rectal melanoma. The patient was successfully managed with surgery followed by external beam radiotherapy and a complete response was achieved after 10 months of follow-up.

Outcomes After Sphincter-Sparing Local Therapy for Anorectal Melanoma: 1989 to 2020

PURPOSE

The treatment paradigm for patients with anorectal melanoma eligible for sphincter-sparing excision has evolved over time. This study examines outcomes across a 30-year era in this rare disease with poor prognosis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients with pelvis-confined anorectal melanoma undergoing sphincter-sparing local excision and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) at our institution between 1989 and 2020. Patterns of care and predictors of outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 108 patients included, 92 (85%) presented with clinically uninvolved nodes. For clinically node-negative patients, the sentinel lymph node biopsy rate increased from 18/43 (42%) before 2008 to 38/49 (78%) subsequently and the use of inguinal nodal RT decreased from 33/35 (94%) before 2003 to 1/57 (2%) subsequently. All clinically node-positive patients treated before 2003 received inguinal nodal RT, whereas no node-positive patient treated subsequently received this treatment. Patients treated before 2016 mostly received biochemotherapy, and those treated since 2017 mostly received immune checkpoint inhibitors. With median follow-up of 32 months, 77 patients (71%) recurred. Three-year actuarial outcomes were 84% local control, 64% nodal control, 38% distant metastasis-free survival, 30% disease-free survival, and 51% melanoma-specific survival. Ostomy-free survival at last follow-up was 95%. Factors contributing to outcome were identified. Outcomes for patients treated in the contemporary era (2017+) were not significantly better than those treated earlier.

CONCLUSIONS

Sphincter-sparing surgery followed by adjuvant RT results in excellent local control and ostomy-free survival for locally resectable anorectal melanoma. Overall oncologic outcomes continue to be poor, reinforcing the need to identify more effective therapies.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-VI. Primary Cutaneous Cancer, Sarcomas and Neuroendocrine Tumors

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, therapeutic assessment, restaging and surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications, and guidelines for image interpretation. Tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided. The current, sixth article in this series addresses PET-CT in an evaluation of aggressive cutaneous malignancies, sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumors. A discussion of the role of FDG PET for all types of tumors in these categories is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this article focuses on the most common malignancies in adult patients encountered in clinical practice. It also focuses on Food and Drug Agency (FDA)-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals rather than research tracers or those requiring a local cyclotron. This information will serve as a guide to primary providers for the appropriate role of PET-CT in managing patients with cutaneous malignancies, sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumors. The nuances of PET-CT interpretation as a practical guide for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees, are also addressed.

Can transrectal ultrasonography distinguish anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal adenocarcinoma? A retrospective paired study for ten years

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) and low rectal adenocarcinoma (LRAC) have some similarities in clinical behaviors, histopathological characteristics and ultrasonographic findings, diagnostic errors are common. By comparing the transrectally ultrasonographic features between the two tumors, we propose to provide more possibilities in differentiating them.

METHODS

The data of 9 ARMMs and 27 age- and gender-matched LRACs (the lower margin below the peritoneal reflection) in West China Hospital Sichuan University between April 2008 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The ultrasonic features between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) showed that the length of ARMM was shorter than that of LRAC (28.22 ± 12.29 mm vs. 40.22 ± 15.16 mm), and ARMM had a lower position than that of LRAC (the distance to anal verge was 50.78 ± 11.70 vs. 63.81 ± 18.73 mm). Unlike LRAC, the majority of ARMM in our study was confined to the intestinal mucosa/submucosa (66.67/25.93%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data of our study, several ultrasonographic findings (length, invasion depth, and position) of ARMM were significantly different from LRAC. Accordingly, more attention should be paid to masses at anorectal junction with lower position, shorter length, and shallower infiltration depth. Instead of the most common tumor, LRAC, ARMM should be taken into account to avoid a misdiagnosis, which will result in a poorer prognosis.

Clinicopathological profile and outcomes of anorectal melanoma from a tertiary care center in India

Background:

Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare subtype of melanoma.

Aim:

To study the clinic–pathologic features and outcomes in patients with AM.

Materials & methods:

Clinical, pathologic findings and outcomes of patients with AM were recorded.

Results:

Twenty-seven patients with AM were identified with median age of 57 years. Most patients presented in stage III (44.4%). Lymph node involvement was seen in 70.4%. The response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy was 16.6 and 25.0%, respectively. At a median follow up of 11 months, median overall survival was 30 months. Ballantine stage 3 and weight loss at presentation were predictors of poor survival.

Conclusion:

AM presents at an advanced stage with lymph node and distant metastasis.

Anorectal melanoma is a rare subset of melanoma presenting at an advanced stage with lymph node and distant metastasis. Early disease is managed surgically; however, optimal treatment of advanced disease is unclear. The stage at diagnosis is the most important prognostic factor. Prognosis is poor, but with the advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the outcomes are improving.

Anorectal and Genital Mucosal Melanoma: Diagnostic Challenges, Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Opportunities of Rare Melanomas

Mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare tumors, being less than 2% of all diagnosed melanomas, comprising a variegated group of malignancies arising from melanocytes in virtually all mucosal epithelia, even if more frequently found in oral and sino-nasal cavities, ano-rectum and female genitalia (vulva and vagina). To date, there is no consensus about the optimal management strategy of MM. Furthermore, the clinical rationale of molecular tumor characterization regarding BRAF, KIT or NRAS, as well as the therapeutic value of immunotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, has not yet been deeply explored and clearly established in MM. In this overview, focused on anorectal and genital MM as models of rare melanomas deserving of a multidisciplinary approach, we highlight the need of referring these patients to centers with experts in melanoma, anorectal and uro-genital cancers treatments. Taking into account the rarity, the poor outcomes and the lack of effective treatment options for MM, tailored research needs to be promptly promoted.

Implementation of robot-assisted curative resection for rare anorectal tumours on the basis of individualised treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the validity of robot-assisted curative operation for rare anorectal tumours, characterised by biological heterogeneity and anatomical complexity.

METHODS

The present study evaluated 16 consecutive patients including three with anorectal squamous cell carcinoma (ARSCC), four with anorectal mucosal melanoma (ARMM), seven with anorectal neuroendocrine tumour (ARNET), and two with other types of anorectal tumours.

RESULTS

Of the three patients with ARSCC after chemoradiotherapy, two underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR), and one underwent ultralow anterior resection (uLAR)/total intersphincteric resection (ISR), surviving 56-76 months without recurrence. Of the four ARMM patients, APR and uLAR/total ISR were conducted in two patients, respectively, with variable survival outcomes. All seven patients with ARNET were treated with uLAR/ISR and LAR, surviving for 5-106 months to date.

CONCLUSIONS

Because most anorectal tumours are confined to the dermal and submucosal layers, robotic anorectal function preserving ISR is expected to achieve R0 resection.

Multimodality Imaging and Genetics of Primary Mucosal Melanomas and Response to Treatment

Mucosal melanomas (MMs) are rare and aggressive tumors that arise from melanocytes in the mucosal tissues that line the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts. Most MMs occur during the 6th and 7th decades of life. MMs may be asymptomatic but may also cause bleeding, pain, and itching, depending on the site of origin. Because of their asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic nature and the difficulty of visualizing them in some cases, they are often advanced tumors at patient presentation. MM staging varies depending on the site of the primary tumor. A simplified staging system allows classification of clinically localized disease as stage I, regional nodal involvement as stage II, and distant metastasis as stage III. MM differs genetically from its cutaneous counterparts. Common drivers in cutaneous melanoma such as B-raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) have a lower mutation rate in MM, whereas mutations of other genes including the KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and splicing factor 3b subunit 1 gene (SF3B1) are more common in MM. Complete resection is the best curative option. However, surgical intervention with wide local excision and negative margins may be difficult to attain because of the local anatomy and the extent of disease. In addition, despite aggressive surgical resection, most patients develop local recurrence and metastatic disease. Recent advances in the treatment of melanoma include immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Unfortunately, MMs have a relatively poor prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 25%. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Primary melanoma of the anorectal region: clinical and histopathological review of 17 cases. A retrospective cohort study

AIM

The aim of our study was to scrutinize diagnostic and treatment factors that may contribute to the low survival rate from anorectal melanoma while adding 17 more cases to the global research database.

METHOD

We carried out a retrospective analysis of 17 cases of anorectal melanoma treated at a single institution from 2000 to 2020. Data on patient age, sex, complaints, treatment and survival as well as tumour size, resection margins, histological and immunohistochemical features were assessed.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 72 ± 12.49 (45-92) years. Most of the patients were women (n = 11, 64.71%). Three (17.65%) patients underwent no radical treatment. Of eight patients treated initially with radical surgery (either total mesorectal excision or abdominoperineal resection), six (75%) were found to have positive lymph nodes. Mean survival was 20 ± 23.46 (1-84) months. The average diameter of the resected tumours was 5.43 ± 3.02 cm (1.3-10 cm). Most tumours had epithelioid or spindle cell morphology and were positive for one or more melanocytic markers (S100, HMB-45 or MITF). More than half of the tumours contained no or very little melanin pigment. None of the tumours had significant lymphocytic infiltration. Three tumours showed positivity for keratins (PANCK or CAM5.2) and one tumour showed positivity for C-KIT stain.

CONCLUSION

An aggressive surgical approach may have an effect on survival in most early stages while more advanced disease benefits from a more conservative approach. Attention to sentinel lymph nodes and further systemic research into therapy is required. For now, treatment and diagnostic modalities seem to be inconsistent, requiring further investigation to elucidate common points.

Anorectal Melanoma-Brownish Black Mass Not Always a Hemorrhoid

The non-specific clinical symptoms of anorectal brownish-black mass do not help to differentiate colorectal cancer, hemorrhoids, rectal ulcers which result in a delayed diagnosis or lead to inadequate management of lethal anorectal melanoma. Primary malignant melanoma of the anorectal region is an uncommon tumor, constituting approximately 1% of anal canal tumors which may be misdiagnosed clinically as hemorrhoids. Because of aggressive behavior and poor prognosis, efficient and prompt diagnosis is required in these cases. We report 2 cases of this rare tumor.

Anorectal Melanoma: An Uncommon Cause of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a rare, aggressive disease. Given that it presents with local symptoms that resemble other common benign anorectal conditions, ARM is often low on the differential diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis and nonconsensus of treatment options lead to poor prognosis. Here, we report the case of an 85-year-old woman with a history of Irritable bowel syndrome who presented with altered bowel habits and bleeding per rectum. CT revealed a rectal mass with metastatic lesions to the bone, liver, and lungs. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for Human Melanoma Black-45, melanoma antigen recognized by T cells, and SRY-related HMG-box 10. A final diagnosis of ARM was made.

Combining quantitative and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging features to differentiate anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer

Background

Distinguishing anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer remains challenging because of the overlap of clinical symptoms and imaging findings. We aim to investigate whether combining quantitative and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features could differentiate anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer.

Methods

Thirty-seven anorectal malignant melanoma and 98 low rectal cancer patients who underwent pre-operative rectal MRI from three hospitals were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were divided into the primary cohort (N = 84) and validation cohort (N = 51). Quantitative image analysis was performed on T1-weighted (T1WI), T2-weighted (T2WI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI). The subjective qualitative MRI findings were evaluated by two radiologists in consensus. Multivariable analysis was performed using stepwise logistic regression. The discrimination performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

The skewness derived from T2WI (T2WI-skewness) showed the best discrimination performance among the entire quantitative image features for differentiating anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer (primary cohort: AUC = 0.852, 95% CI 0.788-0.916; validation cohort: 0.730, 0.645-0.815). Multivariable analysis indicated that T2WI-skewness and the signal intensity of T1WI were independent factors, and incorporating both factors achieved good discrimination performance in two cohorts (primary cohort: AUC = 0.913, 95% CI 0.868-0.958; validation cohort: 0.902, 0.844-0.960).

Conclusions

Incorporating T2WI-skewness and the signal intensity of T1WI achieved good performance for differentiating anorectal malignant melanoma from low rectal cancer. The quantitative image analysis helps improve diagnostic accuracy.

Variable features of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan in anorectal malignant melanoma: Case reports and review articles

Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARM) is a rare variant of malignant melanoma and even more rare among all anorectal cancers. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) scan is valuable in staging, restaging, treatment response evaluation, and long-term follow-up of malignant melanoma. Here, reporting two cases of anorectal melanoma with a variety of FDG uptake pattern and CT-based features and reviewed a few articles to evaluate the pattern of FDG uptake.

Ano-uro-genital mucosal melanoma UK national guidelines

Ano-uro-genital (AUG) mucosal melanomas are rare cancers associated with poor outcomes and limited evidence-based management. The United Kingdom AUG mucosal melanoma guideline development group used an evidence-based systematic approach to make recommendations regarding the diagnosis, treatment and surveillance of patients diagnosed with AUG mucosal melanomas. The guidelines were sent for international peer review, and are accredited by The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). A summary of the key recommendations is presented. The full documents are available on the Melanoma Focus website.

Less is more: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of radical versus conservative primary resection in anorectal melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. There is no consensus as to the optimal primary surgical treatment for ARM, with advocates for both radical (abdominoperineal resection [APR]) and conservative strategies (wide local excision [WLE]). Here, we report a systematic review of studies comparing outcomes between these strategies.

METHODS

Studies comparing APR with WLE in patients with ARM were included, and a systematic review using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was performed. Outcomes deemed critical included overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence and quality of life.

RESULTS

Forty studies were identified, of which 27 were suitable for inclusion. Twenty-three studies compared overall survival between WLE and APR, with no difference in outcomes noted (risk ratio [RR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.07, p = 0.13). Seven studies compared disease-free survival, with no difference in outcomes noted (RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.61-1.91, p = 0.79). A total of 19 studies compared local recurrence rates, with again no significant difference in outcomes noted (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.44-1.14, p = 0.16). None of the studies identified reported quality of life-related outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence to suggest that a radical primary surgical strategy improves outcomes in ARM. Therefore, given the well-documented morbidity associated with APR, WLE with regular surveillance for local recurrence should be the primary strategy in most patients.

Prognostic model for patient survival in primary anorectal mucosal melanoma: stage at presentation determines relevance of histopathologic features

Pathological staging of primary anorectal mucosal melanoma is often performed according to the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines for cutaneous melanoma, as an anorectal melanoma-specific staging system does not exist. However, it remains unknown whether prognostic factors derived for cutaneous melanoma also stratify risk in anorectal melanoma. We retrospectively determined correlations between clinicopathological parameters and disease-specific survival in 160 patients. Patients were grouped by clinical stage at presentation (localized disease, regional or distant metastases). Cox proportional hazards regression models determined associations with disease-specific survival. We also summarized the somatic mutations identified in a subset of tumors analyzed for hotspot mutations in cancer-associated gene panels. Most of the patients were white (82%) and female (61%). The median age was 62 years. With a median follow-up of 1.63 years, median disease-specific survival was 1.75 years, and 121 patients (76%) died of anorectal melanoma. Patients presenting with regional (34%) or distant metastases (24%) had significantly shorter disease-specific survival compared to those with disease localized to the anorectum (42%). Of the 71 anorectal melanoma tumors analyzed for hotspot genetic alterations, somatic mutations involving the KIT gene (24%) were most common followed by NRAS (19%). Increasing primary tumor thickness, lymphovascular invasion, and absence of regression also correlated with shorter disease-specific survival. Primary tumor parameters correlated with shorter disease-specific survival in patients presenting with localized disease (tumor thickness) or regional metastases (tumor thickness, absence of regression, and lymphovascular invasion), but not in patients presenting with distant metastases. Grouping of patients according to a schema based on modifications of the 8th edition AJCC cutaneous melanoma staging system stratified survival in anorectal melanoma. Our findings support stage-specific associations between primary tumor parameters and disease-specific survival in anorectal melanoma. Moreover, the AJCC cutaneous melanoma staging system and minor modifications of it predicted survival among anorectal melanoma patients.

Primary malignant melanoma without melanosis of the colon

Primary malignant melanoma (PMM) of the gastrointestinal tract is rare. Reported cases of PMM of the lower gastrointestinal tract typically describe anal and rectal involvement rather than colonic lesions. This report describes a rare case of a 50-year-old woman with PMM originating in the colon. The patient presented to Inje University Busan Paik Hospital with a 3-day history of blood-tinged stools. She underwent colonoscopy for a diagnosis of hematochezia. The colonoscopic examination revealed a large-sized semi-pedunculated sigmoid colon polyp with a reddish-colored mucosal surface. Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed, and the final histopathological findings were consistent with a diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Systemic work-up was performed for assessment of metastasis and to identify the primary tumor considering the high metastatic rate of gastrointestinal malignant melanoma; however, no other malignant lesion was detected. Thus, she was diagnosed with colonic PMM. She underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection and lymph node dissection and has been recurrence-free for > 2 years.

Premalignant and Malignant Perianal Lesions

Anal cancer is a heterogeneous and rare disease process that accounts for ∼1.5% of all gastrointestinal tract malignancies. The perianal skin plays host to a variety of different premalignant and malignant lesions, all with variable histology, treatment options, and prognosis. Anal cancers in general are notorious for having a delayed or missed diagnosis leading to treatment delays and may have an impact on survival. This delay is in part due to the nonspecific symptomatology and also improper physical examination of the sensitive and anatomically complex perianal region and anal canal. This article examines the various types of perianal cancers and their precursor lesions and will explore treatment options as well as outcomes and prognosis.

Multiple synchronous anorectal melanomas with different colors: A case report

BACKGROUND

Anorectal melanoma (AM) is an extremely rare malignant tumor originating from anorectal melanocytes with a poor prognosis. AM has been reported to have a much lower incidence than cutaneous or choroid melanoma, accounting for 0.4%-1.6% of all melanomas.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a 76-year-old female patient diagnosed with anorectal malignant melanoma by colonoscopy and biopsy. Intraoperative examination revealed two distinct anorectal tumors, one melanotic and another amelanotic, as well as two pigmented mucosal zones at the dentate line level. Abdominal perineal resection was performed. A pathological report confirmed all four lesions to be melanomas. Postoperatively, we followed an immunotherapy protocol targeting PD-1 (nivolumab). The patient had 24 mo of disease-free follow-up upon completion of nivolumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

This is the first reported case presenting coexistence of pigmented and unpigmented AMs in the same patient.

Anorectal Malignant Melanoma: Retrospective Analysis of Six Patients and Review of the Literature

Malignant melanomas are rare aggressive tumours originating from the pigment-producing melanocytes. In our study, a review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery at our clinic due to anorectal malignant melanoma were performed. The information of 6 patients undergoing surgery in our clinic due to anorectal malignant melanoma between January 2010 and January 2018 was retrieved retrospectively. The patients were assessed regarding demographic data, physical examination and imaging findings, the surgical method performed, postoperative complication, histopathological findings, oncological treatment and follow-up results. Four of the patients were female and 2 were male and the mean age was 61.6 (46–83) years. Two patients (33%) had liver metastases at the time of initial presentation. Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in all patients 3 with laparoscopic method. The mean length of hospital stay was recorded to be 6.5 ± 1 days (5–12 days). Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were administered in all patients. Also, interferon treatment was administered in one patient additionally. During the follow-up, 4 patients died due to extensive metastatic disease determined approximately in the 13th month. Two patients with regular follow-up are well and free of disease and their mean postoperative lifetime has been determined to be 12.5 months (6–26 months). Anorectal malignant melanomas (ARMM) are rare but aggressive tumours. The treatment should be focused on minimizing morbidity and maximizing the quality of life and function while removing the gross tumour.

JOURNAL CLUB: Primary Anorectal Melanoma: MRI Findings and Clinicopathologic Correlations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the MRI features of primary anorectal malignant melanoma and to correlate these features with its clinical and pathologic characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 12 patients (five men and seven women; mean age [± SD], 60.8 ± 10.0 years) with pathologically proven primary anorectal melanoma were retrospectively reviewed. MRI findings were analyzed to determine the shape, size, distance from the anal verge, presence of perirectal or anal infiltration, signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, presence of diffusion restriction, contrast enhancement pattern of the lesion, presence of lymphadenopathy, and occurrence of bowel obstruction. Subsequent follow-up data for the patients were recorded.

RESULTS

The most common presentation was hematochezia (41.7% of patients). Common findings on MRI included a large intraluminal polypoid mass (75.0% of lesions) with little perirectal or anal infiltration (100.0%), T1 hyperintensity (66.7%), high T2 signal intensity (54.5%) or mixed T2 signal intensity (45.5%), restricted diffusion (100.0%), and hyper-enhancement (100.0%). The mean length, width, and depth of these masses were 3.5, 2.9, and 2.3 cm, respectively. The mean distance from the anal verge was 1.8 cm. Lymphadenopathy was frequently identified (75.0% of cases), with lymph nodes larger than 2 cm noted in 28.5% of cases and most commonly involving the perirectal area (77.8% of cases). No colonic obstructions were observed. The mean patient follow-up was 32.7 months. A total of 25.0% of patients died as a result of disease progression.

CONCLUSION

The possibility of the presence of anorectal melanoma should be considered for patients with a bulky intraluminal polypoid mass in the anorectum without colonic obstruction, with the mass showing T1 hyperintensity, high or mixed signal T2 intensity, hyperenhancement, minimal perirectal or anal infiltration, and lymphadenopathy.

Endoscopic diagnosis of primary anorectal melanoma

OBJECTIVE

The present study retrospectively analyzed case data from 12 patients diagnosed with anorectal melanoma, with the purpose of identifying key diagnostic features at endoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images from colonoscopy were reviewed for all patients in order to establish the endoscopic features of primary anorectal melanoma. For the patients whose colonoscopic examinations included endoscopic ultrasound, images were examined to characterize lesions and the depth of infiltration, the results of which were compared with pathological findings after operative resection.

RESULTS

At colonoscopy, superficial melanin pigmentation was identified in 10 patients with anorectal melanoma, with morphology including spots, patches, or sheets of pigmentation. In patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound, lesions appeared as masses on the mucosal side with inhomogeneous or low-level internal echoes or ulcer-type lesions invading the muscularis propria. Lesions diagnosed as anorectal melanoma also demonstrated irregular margins and varying degrees of submucosal infiltration. Infiltration depth of melanoma via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was concordant with surgical pathology results in 100% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Colonoscopy combined with biopsy and subsequent pathological examination can accurately diagnose primary anorectal melanoma. Moreover, EUS is a reliable tool for assessing the depth of infiltration of this disease.

[Anorectal malignant melanoma : Treatment recommendations]

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malignant melanoma is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Typical symptoms (bleeding, pain, perianal mass) are characteristic of hemorrhoids. This, together with the high rate of amelanotic tumors, often delays diagnosis. No therapy guidelines exist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on our own experience of surgically treated patients and an extensive literature search, we present a stage-dependent therapeutic concept.

RESULTS

Eight patients (six women) with a mean age of 65 ± 8 years were treated at our institution. Six underwent abdominoperineal resection; two had local excision. Two patients additionally underwent inguinal lymph node dissection. Median survival was 12 months with a disease-free survival of 6 months. Forty treatment studies with a total of 1,970 cases could be identified. Prognostic factors are age, time to correct diagnosis, tumor extent, tumor stage, and perineural invasion. The impact of lymph node metastases and R0 resection varies. Surgery is the only effective therapy. Local excision is sufficient when free resection margins are achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Locally limited tumors should be resected; if possible using local excision. Larger tumors or tumors with sphincter infiltration often require abdominoperineal resection with curative intent. When regional lymph node metastases are present, we advise regional lymphadenectomy of the affected area. In the case of distant metastases, palliative surgery is needed for metastasectomy and in cases of incontinence or refractory pain.

Abdominal perineal resection or wilde local excision in primary anorectal malignant melanoma. Case report and review

Introduction

Primary anorectal malignant melanoma is a rare and aggressive tumor that carries a poor prognosis. Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is often misdiagnosed as hemorrhoids adenocarcinoma polips and rectal cancer. ARM spreads along sub-mucosal planes and is often to wide-spread for complete resection at time of diagnosis and almost all patients die because of metastases.

Presentation of the case

A 77-year-old male patient presented a history of recurrent rectal bleeding and whose histopathological diagnosis was melanoma.

Discussion

The treatment of choice remains controversial. Surgery with complete resection represents the typical treatment. However standard operative procedures related to the area of resection and lymph dissection have yet to be established. Abdominal perineal resection (APR) with or without bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy or wide local excision (WLE) have been used to manage patients with ARM.

Conclusion

The higher serum levels of LDH and YKL-40 are suggestive for Anorectal Melanoma diagnosis. The decrease of these findings may be associated with good prognosis. The review of both APR and WLE options suggests no significant difference in survival among patients.

•

Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a systemic disease.

•

Regardless how aggressive is ARM, no surgical treatment will truly change the outcome.

•

If surgical teqchniques are available, patients should undergo to wide local excision.

•

In case of recurrence, the abdominal resection should be considered as the best surgical treatment.

Clinical and Imaging Features of Noncutaneous Melanoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to summarize the epidemiologic characteristics, clinical aspects, and radiologic appearance of as well as the management considerations and differential diagnoses for noncutaneous primary melanomas occurring at specific anatomic sites. Primary ocular, sinonasal, meningeal, biliary, adrenal, alimentary tract, and genitourinary melanomas are highlighted.

CONCLUSION

Noncutaneous primary melanomas are a complex group of malignancies with biologic findings that are unique when compared with findings for cutaneous melanomas. Each noncutaneous primary melanoma has its own specific diagnostic and management challenges, depending on the anatomic location where they arise.

Diagnostic value of MRI and computed tomography in anorectal malignant melanoma

Here, we report 12 cases of anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM), which has a very rare incidence. Patients were examined by either computed tomography or MRI or computed tomography combined with MRI before they underwent a remission operation. Because of the paramagnetic contribution from melanin, the short T(1) and short T(2) signals in MRI were specific to melanoma. MRI is reliable in the early diagnosis of ARMM, which is confirmed by pathological reports. Therefore, we advocate the application of a radiological screen using MRI for those patients with a mole in the anorectal region and abnormal colonoscopy findings.

Anorectal malignant melanoma: curative abdominoperineal resection: patient selection with 18F-FDG-PET/CT

Background

Anorectal malignant melanomas (ARMM) are rare tumors, characterized by an early lymphatic spread and distant metastasis, resulting in an extremely poor overall survival. The objective of this study was to determine the pattern of regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) by computed tomography (CT) and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR) and its impact on oncologic outcome.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of six consecutive patients who underwent APR due to primary ARMM was performed. Patients were staged by CT and PET/CT.

Results

Four out of six patients had preoperative LNM involvement (two patients inguinal and perirectal, one iliacal, one perirectal), with two of them presenting with distant metastases additionally. Inguinal/iliacal LNM in two patients as well as liver metastasis in one patient was seen in PET/CT and missed by CT. The three patients with initial inguinal/iliacal LNM died during the observation period (overall survival: 10 (6–18) months). The three patients without inguinal/iliacal LNM involvement are currently alive, one patient showing a slowly progressive disease since 5 years, and two patients are tumor-free since 8.5 and 1.5 years (the patients had initial perirectal LNM).

Conclusions

In ARMM, PET/CT is superior to CT in detection of LNM and distant metastasis. APR is possibly a curative approach if the PET/CT shows exclusively perirectal LNM despite locally advanced tumor growth.

Evolving Therapeutic Strategies in Mucosal Melanoma Have Not Improved Survival over Five Decades

Mucosal melanoma represents a distinct minority of disease sites and portends a worse outcome. The ideal treatment and role of adjuvant therapy remains unknown at this time. We hypothesized that a combination of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies would improve survival in these aggressive melanomas. Our large, prospectively maintained melanoma database was queried for all patients diagnosed with mucosal melanoma. Over the past five decades, 227 patients were treated for mucosal melanoma. There were 82 patients with anorectal, 75 with sinonasal, and 70 with urogenital melanoma. Five-year overall survival and melanoma-specific survival for the entire cohort were 32.8 and 37.5 per cent, respectively, with median overall survival of 38.7 months. One hundred forty-two patients (63.8%) underwent adjuvant therapy and 15 were treated neo-adjuvantly (6.6%). There was no survival difference by therapy type or timing, disease site, or decade of diagnosis. There was improved survival in patients undergoing multiple surgeries (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.55, P = 0.0005). Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy had significantly worse survival outcomes (HR 2.49, P = 0.013). Over the past five decades, improvements have not been seen in outcomes for mucosal melanoma. Although multiple surgical interventions portend a better outcome in patients with mucosal melanoma, adjuvant treatment decisions must be individualized.

Primary anorectal malignant melanoma treated with endoscopic mucosal resection

Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm that accounts for less than 1-4% of anorectal malignant tumors. The main therapeutic modality for anorectal melanoma is surgical treatment, with abdominoperineal resection or wide local excision being the most common approaches. A 77-year-old male with a history of cerebral infarction and hypertension presented with anal bleeding. Here, we report a case of anorectal melanoma treated by endoscopic mucosal resection with adjuvant interferon therapy rather than surgical resection. The patient has been disease-free for 5 years after endoscopic treatment.

Preliminary Suggestion about Staging of Anorectal Malignant Melanoma May Be Used to Predict Prognosis

PURPOSE

Anorectal malignant melanomas (AMM) are rare and have poor survival. The study aims to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with AMM, and to devise a staging system predictive of survival outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 28 patients diagnosed with, and treated for AMM. Patients classified by clinical staging of mucosal melanoma (MM) were reclassified via rectal and anal TNM staging. Survival outcomes were compared among patients grouped by the three different staging systems.

RESULTS

The three staging systems were equated with similar figures for 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients diagnosed with stage I disease. Patients (n=19) diagnosed with MM stage II disease were reclassified by rectal TNM staging into three subgroups: IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC. For these patients, both 5-year OS and 5-year DFS differed significantly between the subgroups IIIA and IIIC (OS: IIIA vs. IIIC, 66.7% vs. 0%, p=0.002; DFS: IIIA vs. IIIC, 51.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of prognosis in patients diagnosed with AMM and lymph node metastasis has improved by using rectal TNM staging, which includes information regarding the number of lymph node metastases.

Anal Melanoma With Neuroendocrine Differentiation

Melanoma of the anal cavity is an uncommon malignant tumor with an aggressive clinical behavior. The presence of nonmelanocytic cell or tissue components, designated as divergent differentiation, is an unusual but well-documented phenomenon in melanoma. We experienced a rare case of amelanotic melanoma with neuroendocrine differentiation of the anal canal, occurring in a 68-year old woman. This tumor was characterized by a clear-cut radial growth phase and an invasive component composed of a diffuse small cells population positive for neuroendocrine markers with a focal but convincing co-expression of S100 protein. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first case of neuroendocrine differentiation in a primary melanoma of the anal cavity. Although anal melanoma with neuroendocrine differentiation is exceptional, clinical practitioners should be aware of its possibility at this site.

Unexpected post-operative diagnosis of primary rectal melanoma. A case report

AIM

Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a very uncommon and highly lethal malignancy. Due to its rarity and non-specific symptoms, preoperative diagnosis may be often erroneous and subsequent treatment inappropriate. We report a case of primary rectal melanoma and discuss the current diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

CASE REPORT

An 87-year-old man was admitted to our surgical unit with a history of progressive constipation, tenesmus, rectal bleeding and transanal mucous discharge. Preoperative investigations, including CT scan and colonoscopy with biopsy, were suggestive for locally advanced low rectal sarcoma and therefore the patient underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry resulted in a postoperative diagnosis of primary rectal melanoma. The patient died 6 months later due to local and systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

ARM should always be considered when unusual anorectal lesions are discovered. Regardless of the pathological stage and the extent of surgery, prognosis of ARM remains poor. Thus, whenever feasible, wide local excision is now the preferred treatment, since it is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and better quality of life compared to APR. In our case, although the initial diagnosis was incorrect, APR was justified by the local invasiveness and large size of the tumor.

The clinical features and optimal treatment of anorectal malignant melanoma

Anorectal malignant melanoma (AMM) is a very rare and aggressive disease. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical features of AMM, to understand treatment options, and optimal therapy by reviewing pertinent literature. Traditionally an abdominoperineal resection (APR) sacrificing the anal sphincter has been performed for radical resection of cancer, but recently, wide excision of AMM is attempted since quality of life after surgery is an important issue. Some authors reported that there was no difference in five-year survival between the patient who underwent an APR and wide excision. The goal of both APR and wide excision was to improve survival with R0 resection. Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy can be performed to achieve an R0 resection. AMM shows very poor prognosis. At this time, research on AMM is insufficient to suggest a treatment guideline. Thus, treatment options, and a therapeutic method should be selected carefully.

Non-cutaneous melanoma: is there a role for (18)F-FDG PET-CT?

Non-cutaneous melanomas (NCM) are diverse and relatively uncommon. They often differ from cutaneous melanomas in their epidemiology, genetic profile and biological behaviour. Despite the growing body of evidence regarding the utility of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in cutaneous melanoma, the data on its use in NCM are scarce. In this review, we will summarize the existing literature and present cases from our experience with NCM to illustrate current knowledge on the potential role and limitations of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose PET/CT in NCM.

Anorectal malignant melanoma in a hemorrhoidal nodule: a diagnostic and therapeutic problem

Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is an extremely rare condition, often misdiagnosed and mistreated until development of metastatic disease. Clinical presentation mimicking hemorrhoids is a well-known pitfall. We present a male patient with hemorrhoidal nodules who was referred to the policlinic of dermatology for management of anal pruritus. A dark macule was detected over one of the hemorrhoidal nodules histologically verified as melanoma. Subsequent CT and PET/CT showed lymph nodes involvement and the patient underwent wide local excision (WSE) followed by abdominoperineal resection (APR). The rarity of ARMM does not allow for establishment of a validated staging system, placebo-controlled treatment trials and management guidelines adoption. The current treatment for the condition is surgical excision, using different techniques according to the stage of the disease and depth of invasion. The prognosis and overall survival are poor, but recent genetic studies give promising results for molecular targeting. Awareness for this disease is indispensable, as early recognition could result in improved survival and quality of life.