A Canadian Cohort Study to Evaluate the Outcomes Associated with a Multicenter Initiative to Reduce Antipsychotic Use in Long-Term Care Homes

Synthesis of interventions using an interRAI tool to guide care management and assess intervention efficacy in older adults: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

interRAI is a global collaboration of clinicians, researchers and policy-makers who have developed a suite of assessment tools to assess the health status and care needs of older adults in various settings (ie, home, long-term care, etc). We aim to determine how interRAI tools have been used as an intervention and to evaluate intervention efficacy in older adults (65+) across diverse healthcare settings. Importantly, given the deployment of interRAI primarily in high-income countries, we anticipate that the findings may have minimal relevance to low- and middle-income nations, where there is an immediate and urgent need for equity in geriatric assessment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

To be included, all studies must satisfy our inclusion criteria, outlined by the population (ie, older adults and/or individuals providing some element of care to older adults), intervention (ie, randomised or non-randomised), comparator (ie, with or without one) and outcome (ie, how the interRAI formed the basis of a study intervention). Our search strategy is based on previous reviews of interRAI tools, our research and clinical experience, and the expertise of a specialised librarian. In addition to PubMed, we will conduct our search without date or language restrictions in Scopus, Embase,Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Academic Search Premier and PsycInfo. Study screening will employ a team-based approach, with Kappa statistics >0.8 indicating 'substantial' agreement and an acceptable threshold. Data extraction will capture the study ID and design, as well as sample characteristics and outcomes. Reporting will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews, with findings presented graphically and narratively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required. Our knowledge dissemination strategies include traditional research avenues (ie, manuscript publications). We will also create an infographic to disperse widely and leverage existing partnerships to provide community presentations.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BGJKP.

A Longitudinal Treatment Effect Analysis of Antipsychotics on Behavior of Residents in Long-Term Care

OBJECTIVE

The proportion of long-term care (LTC) residents being treated with antipsychotic medication is high, and these medications may exacerbate behavioral symptoms. We used propensity scores to investigate the effect of antipsychotic use on the worsening of behavioral symptoms among residents in LTC facilities.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Residents in LTC in 8 provinces and 1 territory in Canada, without severe aggressive behavior at baseline and reassessed at follow-up, between March 2000 and March 2022.

METHODS

We used propensity score matching and weighting to balance baseline covariates and logistic regression to estimate the effect of antipsychotics on the worsening of behavioral symptoms in the original, matched, and weighted cohorts. The treatment variable was use of antipsychotic medication at baseline and the outcome was worsening of behavior at follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 494,215 participants were included [318,234 women and 175,981 men; mean age 82.8 years (SD 10.1; range 18-112)].130 558 (26.4%) used antipsychotics at baseline and 88,632 (17.9%) had worsening behavior in follow-up. In the matched cohort, there were 249,698 participants, and 124,849 were matched (1:1) in each treatment group. There was a significant association between antipsychotic use at baseline and worsening in behavior at follow-up in the adjusted regression models [OR 1.27 (95% CI 1.25-1.29), <0.0001] as well as in matched [OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.17-1.21), <0.0001] and weighted [OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.24-1.28), <0.0001] cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This study further evidence to support the cautious use of antipsychotics in LTC facilities. Future research in LTC facilities could include a more granular analyses of behavior change, including bidirectional analyses between different symptom severity classifications.

The Medical Complexity of Newly Admitted Long-Term Care Residents Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study

The COVID-19 pandemic had profound effects on the long-term care (LTC) setting worldwide, including changes in admission practices. We aimed to describe the characteristics and medical complexity of newly admitted LTC residents before (March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020) and during (March 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic via a population-based serial cross-sectional study in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, Canada. With data from the Minimum Data Set 2.0 we characterize the medical complexity of newly admitted LTC residents via the Geriatric 5Ms framework (mind, mobility, medication, multicomplexity, matters most) through descriptive statistics (counts, percentages), stratified by pandemic wave, month, and province. We included 45 756 residents admitted in the year prior to and 35 744 during the first year of the pandemic. We found an increased proportion of residents with depression, requiring extensive assistance with activities of daily living, hip fractures, antipsychotic use, expected to live <6 months, with pneumonia, low social engagement, and admitted from acute care. Our study confirms an increase in medical complexity of residents admitted to LTC during the pandemic and can be used to plan services and interventions and as a baseline for continued monitoring in changes in population characteristics over time.

Primary care quality for older adults: Practice-based quality measures derived from a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method study

We established consensus on practice-based metrics that characterize quality of care for older primary care patients and can be examined using secondary health administrative data. We conducted a two-round RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) study and recruited 10 Canadian clinicians and researchers with expertise relevant to the primary care of elderly patients. Informed by a literature review, the first RAM round evaluated the appropriateness and importance of candidate quality measures in an online questionnaire. Technical definitions were developed for each endorsed indicator to specify how the indicator could be operationalized using health administrative data. In a virtual synchronous meeting, the expert panel offered feedback on the technical specifications for the endorsed indicators. Panelists then completed a second (final) questionnaire to rate each indicator and corresponding technical definition on the same criteria (appropriateness and importance). We used statistical integration to combine technical expert panelists' judgements and content analysis of open-ended survey responses. Our literature search and internal screening resulted in 61 practice-based quality indicators for rating. We developed technical definitions for indicators endorsed in the first questionnaire (n = 55). Following the virtual synchronous meeting and second questionnaire, we achieved consensus on 12 practice-based quality measures across four Priority Topics in Care of the Elderly. The endorsed indicators provide a framework to characterize practice- and population-level encounters of family physicians delivering care to older patients and will offer insights into the outcomes of their care provision. This study presented a case of soliciting expert feedback to develop measurable practice-based quality indicators that can be examined using administrative data to understand quality of care within population-based data holdings. Future work will refine and operationalize the technical definitions established through this process to examine primary care provision for older adults in a particular context (Ontario, Canada).

Long-Term Care Resident Health and Quality of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Synthesis Analysis of Canadian Institute for Health Information Data Tables

Objective

Long-term care (LTC) homes ("nursing homes") were challenged during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on resident admission and discharge rates, resident health attributes, treatments, and quality of care.

Design

Synthesis analysis of "Quick Stats" standardized data table reports published yearly by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. These reports are a pan-Canadian scorecard of LTC services rendered, resident health characteristics, and quality indicator performance.

Setting and participants

LTC home residents in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, and Ontario, Canada that were assessed with the interRAI Minimum Data Set 2.0 comprehensive health assessment in fiscal years 2018/2019, 2019/2020 (pre-pandemic period), and 2020/2021 (pandemic period).

Methods

Risk ratio statistics were calculated to compare admission and discharge rates, validated interRAI clinical summary scale scores, medication, therapy and treatment provision, and seventeen risk-adjusted quality indicator rates from the pandemic period relative to prior fiscal years.

Results

Risk of dying in the LTC home was greater in all provinces (risk ratio [RR] range 1.06-1.18) during the pandemic. Quality of care worsened substantially on 6 of 17 quality indicators in British Columbia and Ontario, and 2 quality indicators in Manitoba and Alberta. The only quality indicator where performance worsened during the pandemic in all provinces was the percentage of residents that received antipsychotic medications without a diagnosis of psychosis (RR range 1.01-1.09).

Conclusions and implications

The COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled numerous areas to strengthen LTC and ensure that resident's physical, social, and psychological needs are addressed during public health emergencies. Except an increase in potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use, this provincial-level analysis indicates that most aspects of resident care were maintained during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Patterns of Antipsychotic Dispensation to Long-Term Care Residents

OBJECTIVES

To describe dispensing patterns of antipsychotic medications to long-term care (LTC) residents and assess factors associated with continuation of an antipsychotic after a fall-related hospitalization.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Nova Scotia Seniors Pharmacare Program (NSSPP) beneficiaries age 66 years and older who resided in LTC and received at least 1 dispensation of an antipsychotic within the study period of April 1, 2009, to March 31, 2017.

METHODS

Linkage of administrative claims data from the NSSPP and the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database identified LTC residents with an antipsychotic dispensation and from the subgroup of those dispensed antipsychotic medications who experienced a fall-related hospitalization. Antipsychotic dispensing patterns were reported with counts and means. Predictors of continuation of an antipsychotic after a fall-related hospitalization (sex, length of stay, days supplied, age, year of admission, rural/urban) were reported and analyzed with multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 19,164 unique NSSPP beneficiaries who were dispensed at least 1 prescription for an antipsychotic medication. Of those who received at least 1 antipsychotic dispensation 90% (n = 17,201) resided in LTC. A mean of 40% (n = 2637) of LTC residents received at least 1 antipsychotic dispensation in each year. Risperidone and quetiapine were dispensed most frequently. Of the 544 beneficiaries residing in LTC who survived a fall-related hospitalization, 439 (80.7%) continued an antipsychotic after hospital discharge. Female sex [OR 1.7, 95% CI (1.013‒2.943)], age 66‒69 [OR 4.587, 95% CI (1.4‒20.8)], 75-79 [OR 2.8, 95% CI (1.3‒6.3)], and 80‒84 years [OR 3.1, 95% CI (1.6‒6.4)] (compared with age 90+ years) were associated with increased risk of antipsychotic continuation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

With 90% of antipsychotic dispensations in Nova Scotia being to LTC residents and 40% of LTC residents being dispensed antipsychotics in any year there is a need to address this level of antipsychotic dispensation to older adults.

Developing an Intuitive Graph Representation of Knowledge for Nonpharmacological Treatment of Psychotic Symptoms in Dementia

Applying person-centered, nonpharmacological interventions to manage psychotic symptoms of dementia is promoted for health care professionals, particularly gerontological nurses, who are responsible for care of older adults in nursing homes. A knowledge graph is a graph consisting of a set of concepts that are linked together by their interrelationship and has been widely used as a formal representation of domain knowledge in health. However, there is lack of a knowledge graph for nonpharmacological treatment of psychotic symptoms in dementia. Therefore, we developed a comprehensive, human- and machine-understandable knowledge graph for this domain, named Dementia-Related Psychotic Symptom Nonpharmacological Treatment Ontology (DRPSNPTO). This graph was built by adopting the established NeOn methodology, a knowledge graph engineering method, to meet the quality standards for biomedical knowledge graphs. This intuitive graph representation of the domain knowledge sets a new direction for visualizing and computerizing gerontological knowledge to facilitate human comprehension and build intelligent aged care information systems. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(4), 49-55.].

Resident and family engagement in medication management in aged care facilities: a systematic review

Introduction: Medication-related harms may occur if residents and families are not involved when important medication decisions are made. We examined how residents and families engage in the management of residents' medications in aged care facilities.Areas covered: A systematic review was undertaken, which was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020152700). Electronic databases were searched from inception until 27 August 2020 using MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Data synthesis was undertaken using thematic analysis.Expert opinion: Forty studies were included. Communication tended to be unidirectional comprising consultations where residents and families provided medication information to health care providers or where health care providers provided medication information to residents and families. Many challenges prevailed that prevented effective engagement, including families' hesitation about making decisions, and the lack of adequately-trained health care providers. Testing of interventions often did not include residents or families in developing these interventions or in examining how they participated in medication decisions following implementation of interventions. Areas for improvement comprise actively involving residents and families in planning interventions for resident-centered care. Health care providers need to have greater appreciation of families' ability to detect dynamic changes in residents' behavior, which can be used to enable optimal alterations in medication therapy.

Social Connection is Essential in Long-Term Care Homes: Considerations During COVID-19 and Beyond

COVID-19 has had a profound impact on long-term care (LTC) homes in Canada. But the measures put in place to control infection within LTC homes have also had devastating impacts on the health and well-being of residents through the effects on social connection. Here, we offer guiding principles to enable social connection and promote health and quality of life for LTC residents during COVID-19 and beyond. These principles were generated by a working group of the COVID-19 and Dementia Task Force, convened by the Alzheimer Society of Canada to identify the urgent and emerging issues raised by COVID-19 for Canadians with dementia.

Effect of a multimethod quality improvement intervention on antipsychotic medication use among residents of long-term care

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic medications are used to address neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with dementia. Evidence suggests that among older adults with dementia, their harms outweigh their benefits. A quality improvement initiative was conducted to address inappropriate antipsychotic medication use in long-term care (LTC) in the province of Alberta.

METHODS

We conducted a multimethod evaluation of the provincial implementation of the project in 170 LTC sites over a 3-year project period incorporating a quasi-experimental before-after design. Using a three-component intervention of education and audit and feedback delivered in a learning workshop innovation collaborative format, local LTC teams were supported to reduce the number of residents receiving antipsychotic medications in the absence of a documented indication. Project resources were preferentially allocated to supporting sites with the highest baseline antipsychotic medication use. Changes in antipsychotic medication use, associated clinical and economic outcomes, and the effects of the project on LTC staff, physicians, leaders and administrators, and family members of LTC residents were assessed at the conclusion of the implementation phase.

RESULTS

The province-wide initiative was delivered with a 75% implementation fidelity. Inappropriate antipsychotic medication use declined from 26.8% to 21.1%. The decrease was achieved without unintended consequences in other outcomes including physical restraint use or aggressive behaviours. The project was more expensive but resulted in less inappropriate use of antipsychotics than the pre-project period (incremental cost per inappropriate antipsychotic avoided of $5 678.71). Accounts from family, organisational leaders, and LTC staff were supportive of the project activities and outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This quality improvement initiative was successfully delivered across an entire delivery arm of the continuing care sector. Quality of care in LTC was improved.

Proceedings from an International Virtual Townhall: Reflecting on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Themes from Long-Term Care

Residents of long-term care (LTC) homes have suffered disproportionately during the COVID-19 pandemic, from the virus itself and often from the imposition of lockdown measures. Provincial Geriatrics Leadership Ontario, in collaboration with interRAI and the International Federation on Aging, hosted a virtual Town Hall on September 25, 2020. The purpose of this event was to bring together international perspectives from researchers, clinicians, and policy experts to address important themes potentially amenable to timely policy interventions. This article summarizes these themes and the ensuing discussions among 130 attendees from 5 continents. The disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on frail residents of LTC homes reflects a systematic lack of equitable prioritization by health system decision makers around the world. The primary risk factors for an outbreak in an LTC home were outbreaks in the surrounding community, high staff and visitor traffic in large facilities, and crowding of residents in ageing buildings. Infection control measures must be prioritized in LTC homes, though care must be taken to protect frail and vulnerable residents from their overly blunt application that deprives residents from appropriate physical and psychosocial support. Staffing, in terms of overall numbers, training, and leadership skills, was inadequate. The built environment of LTC homes can be configured for both optimal resident well-being and infection control. Infection control and resident wellness need not be mutually exclusive. Improving outcomes for LTC residents requires more staffing with proper training and interprofessional leadership. All these initiatives must be underpinned by an effective quality assurance system based on standardized, comprehensive, accessible, and clinically relevant data, and which can support broad communities of practice capable of effecting real and meaningful change for frail older persons, wherever they chose to reside.

Does the Person-Centered Care Model Support the Needs of Long-Term Care Residents With Serious Mental Illness and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities?

Person-centered care approaches continue to evolve in long-term care (LTC). At the same time, these settings have faced increased challenges due to a more diverse and complex population, including persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and serious mental illness (SMI). This study examined the mental, social, and physical wellbeing of residents with different diagnoses, within a person-centered care model. It was hypothesized that individual wellbeing would be comparable among all residents, regardless of primary diagnosis. The study cohort was drawn from all admissions to long-term care facilities in the USA from 2011 to 2013. Data are based on admission, 3 and 6 month follow-up Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. The groups examined included: schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders, IDD, dementia, and all others (i.e., none of the above diagnoses). The wellbeing outcomes were depression (mental), pain (physical), and behaviors (social). All residents experienced improvements in pain and depression, though the group without the examined diagnoses experienced the greatest gains. Behaviors were most prevalent among those with psychotic disorders; though marked improvements were noted over time. Improvement also was noted among persons with dementia. Behavior worsened over time for the three other groups. In particular, those with IDD experienced the highest level of worsening at 3-month follow-up, and continued to worsen. The results suggest person-centered care in US nursing homes provides the necessary foundation to promote mental and physical wellbeing in persons with complex needs, but less so for social wellbeing.

Determinants of Non-emergency Use of Control Interventions in Older Canadian Psychiatric Inpatients: Analysizing the InterRAI Mental Health Electronic Health Records

Background: The use of control interventions (CIs; acute control medications, physical/mechanical restraint) is associated with negative physical and psychological outcomes, particularly in older adults who are physically vulnerable. The aims of this study were to: (i) report the rates of CI use in older psychiatric inpatients (age 65 - 84 and age 85+), and compare them with younger age groups (18 - 44, age 45 - 64); and (ii) identify the factors associated with non-emergency CI use in older psychiatric inpatients. Methods: Routinely collected interRAI Mental Health assessments from 2005 - 2018 in Ontario, Canada, were analyzed to determine the rates of CI use. Logistic regression models were used to examine the sociodemographic and clinical determinants of non-emergency and any CI use. Results: There were 226,119 (female: 48.6%) interRAI assessments, and 85% of those assessed were under 65 years of age. The rates of non-emergency CI use in the four age groups were: 18 - 44 = 9.4%, 45 - 64 = 8.3%, 65 - 84 = 9.9%, 85+ = 13.2%. The most significant determinants of non-emergency CI use in older adults were highest impairments in activities of daily living (ADL Short Form score 8-16: OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 2.42 - 3.06), highest levels of aggression (Aggressive Behavior Scale score 4 - 6: OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.57 - 1.98), and highest levels of positive psychotic symptoms (Positive Symptoms Scale score 9+: OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.43 - 1.90). Delirium, cognitive disorder diagnosis, cognitive impairment, and falls were also associated with increased CI use odds, as were having the reasons for admission be danger to self, danger to others or inability to care for self. Females were less likely to have non-emergency CI use (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.73 - 0.95). Patients admitted from long-term care homes had significantly greater odds of non-emergency CI use compared with community admissions (OR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.07 - 1.29). Conclusion: The higher rates of non-emergency CI use in older psychiatric inpatients is concerning. Alternative non-pharmacological and person-centered management strategies should be considered to support older psychiatric inpatients with functional impairment, positive symptoms, aggressive behavior, cognitive impairment and delirium. The use of CIs could be incorporated as a quality improvement activity to monitor changes at various service provision levels.