Infectious risk associated to orthopaedic surgery for rheumatoid arthritis patients treated by anti-TNFalpha

[Septic musculoskeletal complications under immunomodulating treatment]

Infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Among these, musculoskeletal infections represent a relevant proportion as patients with rheumatoid arthritis face an increased risk of developing septic arthritis and prosthesis infections. The causes are multifactorial. In addition to immunosuppressive treatment, risk factors of infection in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients include repeated intra-articular joint punctures, an increased rate of joint replacement surgery, damaged joint structure and comorbidities. The use of glucocorticoids and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, especially in the first 6 months of treatment, increase the risk of septic arthritis and periprosthetic joint infections. In addition, an increased disease activity could also be identified as a risk factor. Under immunosuppressive therapy rare pathogens such as Candida and mycobacteria can cause the infection and should be considered when there is a lack of clinical response to antibiotic treatment.

ASRA Pain Medicine consensus practice infection control guidelines for regional anesthesia and pain medicine

BACKGROUND

To provide recommendations on risk mitigation, diagnosis and treatment of infectious complications associated with the practice of regional anesthesia, acute and chronic pain management.

METHODS

Following board approval, in 2020 the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA Pain Medicine) commissioned evidence-based guidelines for best practices for infection control. More than 80 research questions were developed and literature searches undertaken by assigned working groups comprising four to five members. Modified US Preventive Services Task Force criteria were used to determine levels of evidence and certainty. Using a modified Delphi method, >50% agreement was needed to accept a recommendation for author review, and >75% agreement for a recommendation to be accepted. The ASRA Pain Medicine Board of Directors reviewed and approved the final guidelines.

RESULTS

After documenting the incidence and infectious complications associated with regional anesthesia and interventional pain procedures including implanted devices, we made recommendations regarding the role of the anesthesiologist and pain physician in infection control, preoperative patient risk factors and management, sterile technique, equipment use and maintenance, healthcare setting (office, hospital, operating room), surgical technique, postoperative risk reduction, and infection symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. Consensus recommendations were based on risks associated with different settings and procedures, and keeping in mind each patient's unique characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations are intended to be multidisciplinary guidelines for clinical care and clinical decision-making in the regional anesthesia and chronic interventional pain practice. The issues addressed are constantly evolving, therefore, consistent updating will be required.

Clarification of the Clinical Characteristics of Autoimmune Disease-Related Ulcers to Improve Treatment Outcomes: A Retrospective Study

AimTo clarify the clinical characteristics of autoimmune disease (AID)-related ulcers to improve treatment outcomes.Materials and MethodsThe medical records of 189 patients treated for AID-related ulcers at two tertiary hospitals in Nanjing, China, from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The relevant clinical data included diagnosis, type and severity of wounds, and prescribed medications.ResultsOf the 189 patients with AID-related ulcers, 146 (77.25%) were female and 43 (22.75%) were male. The top four immunological diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren's syndrome, and vasculitis. The four most common wound sites were the lower limb, foot, hand, and upper limb. Regarding the number of wounds, 81 (42.86%) patients had one ulcer, 43 (22.75%) had two, 30 (15.87%) had three, and 35 (18.52%) had four or more. More than half of the patients (54%, 102/189) were previously treated for AID-related ulcers. Of these 102 patients, 27 (26.47%) had one previous diagnosis, 49 (40.83%) had two, and 26 (25.49%) had three or more. Among all 189 patients, 142 (75%) had clinical symptoms of local infection. Of these 142 patients, bacteria cultures were conducted for 70 (49.30%), of which 63 (90.00%) were positive. The most commonly detected bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The median (interquartile range) duration of AID-related ulcers was 55 (39, 90) days. Most patients (87.3%, 165/189) received systemic therapy with immunosuppressants and hormones.ConclusionsThe most common clinical characteristics of AID-associated ulcers were spontaneous rupture, long duration, multiple wounds, bacterial infection, and recurrence. Clarification of the clinical characteristics of AID-associated ulcers can improve treatment outcomes.

The use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs does not increase surgical site infection or delayed wound healing after orthopaedic surgeries for rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of the use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on surgical site infection (SSI) and delayed wound healing (DWH) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 965 elective orthopaedic procedures undertaken in RA patients. The incidences of SSI and DWH were compared between the bDMARDs user and nonuser groups. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for SSI and DWH after propensity score matching. The incidence of postoperative flare-up was also examined.

RESULTS

In 965 procedures, SSI and DWH were identified in 12 and 28 cases, respectively. SSI and DWH were identified in 3 and 17 of 414 procedures treated with bDMARDs, respectively. Flare-up occurred in 21 cases. Propensity score matching identified 315 cases in both groups, with no significant difference in incidence between the two groups. No risk factors for SSI were identified, whereas age, diabetes mellitus, foot and ankle surgery, and a history of musculoskeletal-related infection were identified as risk factors for DWH.

CONCLUSION

The use of bDMARDs was not associated with an increased incidence of SSI or DWH, with the incidence of flare-up being relatively low.

Is Total Joint Arthroplasty an Effective and Safe Option for Psoriatic Arthritis Patients? A Scoping Review

Recent advancements in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have improved patient outcomes, but many still experience disease progression, potentially leading to joint replacement surgery. In this scoping review, we examine the relationship between PsA and orthopedic surgery, focusing on the risks and temporal trends of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the prevalence of postoperative complications, and the effectiveness of these procedures in PsA. The included studies suggest that PsA patients have an overall higher risk of undergoing THA and TKA compared to the general population, but with temporal trends showing a decreased risk for patients diagnosed in recent years. Acute complications, such as renal failure, stroke, and postoperative infections, may be more common in PsA patients than in those with osteoarthritis after THA and TKA. No significant differences were found in pain, function, or satisfaction between PsA, skin psoriasis, and osteoarthritis patients after THA. A key conclusion from our review is the need to strengthen the collaboration between rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons, as interdisciplinary evaluation is crucial for improving the outcomes of PsA patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Effect of tumour necrosis factor-a inhibitors exposure on surgical site infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis investigation was executed to evaluate the effect of tumour necrosis factor-a inhibitor exposure on surgical site infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. A comprehensive literature investigation till October 2023 was applied, and 82 470 individuals with orthopaedic surgery were in the chosen investigations' starting point. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was utilized to compute the value of the effect of tumour necrosis factor-a inhibitors exposure on surgical site infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. Tumour necrosis factor uses had significantly higher surgical site infections (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.21-2.25, p = 0.001) compared with tumour necrosis factor non-use in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. However, no significant difference was found between discontinued and continued tumour necrosis factor on surgical site infections (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35-1.05, p = 0.07) in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery.Significantly higher surgical site infections was found comparing tumour necrosis factor uses to non-use; however, no significant difference was found between discontinued and continued tumour necrosis factor on surgical site infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.

Perioperative management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Updated recommendations of the German Society for Rheumatology

BACKGROUND

Prior to surgical interventions physicians and patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain concerned about interrupting or continuing anti-inflammatory medication. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology has updated its recommendations from 2014.

METHODS

After a systematic literature search including publications up to 31 August 2021, the recommendations on the use of of glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologics (bDMARDs) were revised and recommendations on newer drugs and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs were added.

RESULTS

The glucocorticoid dose should be reduced to as low as possible 2-3 months before elective surgery (in any case <10 mg/day) but should be kept stable 1-2 weeks before and on the day of surgery. In many cases csDMARDs can be continued, exceptions being a reduction of high methotrexate doses to ≤15 mg/week and wash-out of leflunomide if there is a high risk of infection. Azathioprine, mycophenolate and ciclosporin should be paused 1-2 days prior to surgery. Under bDMARDs surgery can be scheduled for the end of each treatment interval. For major interventions Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors should be paused for 3-4 days. Apremilast can be continued. If interruption is necessary, treatment should be restarted as soon as possible for all substances, depending on wound healing.

CONCLUSION

Whether bDMARDs increase the perioperative risk of infection and the benefits and risks of discontinuation remain unclear based on the currently available evidence. To minimize the risk of a disease relapse under longer treatment pauses, in the updated recommendations the perioperative interruption of bDMARDs was reduced from at least two half-lives to one treatment interval.

[Continue or interrupt? Antirheumatic treatment in elective surgery]

In patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, a decision is needed prior to elective surgery on whether the medicinal treatment can be continued or whether the dose needs to be changed or interrupted. The German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has developed updated recommendations that specify a course of action for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and glucocorticoids. The recommendations for action can be adapted to the individual situation and coordinated with the interdisciplinary treating physicians and the patient. Depending on the dose, glucocorticoids have a high risk of infection and should be set as low as possible in the preoperative period. Most of the conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs can be continued. Under biologic (b)DMARDs treatment surgery can be scheduled for the end of each treatment interval. It is recommended that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors should be interrupted for 3-4 days before major interventions. Treatment should be restarted as soon as possible, depending on the wound healing.

Perioperative Management of Immunosuppressive Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Operations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are complicated by the fact that most drugs used in medical management have immunosuppressive mechanisms of action, including corticosteroids and conventional synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. In deciding to continue or discontinue these medications perioperatively, surgeons must weigh the relative risk of infection from immunosuppression against the risk of rheumatoid arthritis symptom flares from reduced medical disease control. The objective of this article is to review the existing evidence regarding perioperative management of immunosuppressive rheumatoid arthritis medications, with a specific focus on relevance to hand and upper-extremity procedures.

Comprehensive risk analysis of postoperative complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis for the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To examine the risk factors of surgical site infection (SSI), delayed wound healing, and death after orthopedic surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We identified articles indexed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina Web published from 2013 to 2019 and other articles. Articles fulfilling the predefined inclusion criteria were reviewed systematically and their quality was appraised according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system with some modifications.

RESULTS

After inclusion and exclusion by full-text review, 29 articles were analyzed. Use of biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs was a risk factor of SSI (risk ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.25-2.19), but not of delayed wound healing. RA itself was a risk factor of SSI, and oral glucocorticoid use was a risk factor of SSI in three of the four studies analyzed and of postoperative death. Age, male sex, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, surgical factors such as foot/ankle and spine surgery and longer operative time were risk factors of those postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients with those factors should be dealt with appropriate cautions to strike a risk-benefit balance of orthopedic surgeries.

[Perioperative management of treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Updated recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology]

BACKGROUND

Prior to surgical interventions physicians and patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain concerned about interrupting or continuing anti-inflammatory medication. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology has updated its recommendations from 2014.

METHODS

After a systematic literature search including publications up to 31 August 2021, the recommendations on the use of of glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologics (bDMARDs) were revised and recommendations on newer drugs and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs were added.

RESULTS

The glucocorticoid dose should be reduced to as low as possible 2-3 months before elective surgery (in any case <10 mg/day) but should be kept stable 1-2 weeks before and on the day of surgery. In many cases csDMARDs can be continued, exceptions being a reduction of high methotrexate doses to ≤15 mg/week and wash-out of leflunomide if there is a high risk of infection. Azathioprine, mycophenolate and ciclosporin should be paused 1-2 days prior to surgery. Under bDMARDs surgery can be scheduled for the end of each treatment interval. For major interventions Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors should be paused for 3-4 days. Apremilast can be continued. If interruption is necessary, treatment should be restarted as soon as possible for all substances, depending on wound healing.

CONCLUSION

Whether bDMARDs increase the perioperative risk of infection and the benefits and risks of discontinuation remain unclear based on the currently available evidence. To minimize the risk of a disease relapse under longer treatment pauses, in the updated recommendations the perioperative interruption of bDMARDs was reduced from at least two half-lives to one treatment interval.

'Should we stop or continue conventional synthetic (including glucocorticoids) and targeted DMARDs before surgery in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases?'

Total hip and total knee arthroplasty) remain important interventions to treat symptomatic knee and hip damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with little change in utilisation rates despite the increasingly widespread use of potent conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and targeted DMARDs including Janus kinase inhibitors and biologics. The majority of patients are receiving these immunosuppressing medications and glucocorticoids at the time they present for arthroplasty. There is minimal randomised controlled trial data addressing the use of DMARDs in the perioperative period, yet patients and their physicians face these decisions daily. This paper reviews what is known regarding perioperative management of targeted and csDMARDs and glucocorticoids.

The association of preoperative TNF-alpha inhibitor use and reoperation rates in spinal fusion surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preoperative TNF-AI use has been associated with increased rate of postoperative infections and complications in a variety of orthopedic procedures. However, the association between TNF-AI use and complications following spine surgery has not yet been studied.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to assess the risk of reoperation in patients prescribed TNF-AI undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 427 patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at a large healthcare system from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2018.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Reoperation within 1 year.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at a large healthcare system from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2018. There were three distinct cohorts of spine surgery patients under study: patients with TNF-AI use in 90 days before surgery, patients with non-TNF-AI DMARD medications use in the 90 days before surgery, and patients taking neither TNF-AI nor other DMARD medications in 90 days before surgery. The primary outcome of interest was reoperation for any reason within 1 year following surgery.

RESULTS

Our study included 90 TNF-AI, 90 DMARD, and 123 control patients. Reoperation up to 1-year postsurgery occurred in 19% (n=17) of the TNF-AI group, 11% (n=10) of the DMARD group, and 6% (n=7) of the control group. The reasons for reoperation for TNF-AI group were 47% (n=8) infection and 53% (n=9) other causes which included failure to fuse and adjacent segment disease. Reasons for reoperation at 1 year were 40% (n=4) infection and 60% (n=6) other causes for DMARD patients and 14% (n=1) infection with 86% (n=6) other causes for control patients. The cox-proportional hazard model of reoperation within 1 year indicated that the odds of reoperation were 3.1 (95% CI:1.4-7.0) and 2.2 (95% CI 0.96-5.3) times higher in the TNF-AI and DMARD groups, respectively, compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients taking TNF-AIs before surgery were found to have a significantly higher rate of reoperation in the 1 year following surgery compared to controls. The higher rate of reoperation associated with TNF-AI use before spinal fusion surgery represents the potential for higher morbidity and costs for patient which is important to consider for both surgeon and patient in preoperative decision making.

Factors associated with revision surgery for olecranon bursitis after bursectomy

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of our study was to identify the factors associated with revision surgery after bursal excision in patients with olecranon bursitis. The secondary aims were to describe the revision rate after bursectomy and to assess which factors are associated with flap surgery after bursectomy and describe the most common complications after bursectomy of the olecranon bursa.

METHODS

We included 191 adult patients with olecranon bursitis who underwent olecranon bursa excision between January 2002 and October 2018. Patients who were pregnant, patients with incomplete records of the primary surgical procedure, and patients who underwent bursectomy during elbow arthroplasty were excluded. After manual chart review, we found that 22 patients had undergone revision surgery. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess the association between revision surgery and patient characteristics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics. Additionally, we collected data regarding postoperative complications and intraoperative variables such as the use of drains, vacuum assisted closure therapy, and flap surgery.

RESULTS

The overall revision rate in our cohort was 11.5% (22 of 191 patients). Bivariate analysis showed that patients who underwent revision surgery were more frequently women (P = .004), more often had a history of ipsilateral (P = .020) or contralateral (P = .012) olecranon bursitis, and more often received a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (P = .001) or diabetes mellitus (P = .019). The most common complications were delayed wound healing (n = 8, 4.2%) and osteomyelitis (n = 8, 4.2%). Flap surgery was performed in 5 patients (2.6%). Bivariate analysis showed that patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent flap surgery more frequently (P = .011).

CONCLUSION

The revision rate after bursectomy for olecranon bursitis was 11.5% (22 of 191 patients). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, or a history of ipsilateral and contralateral olecranon bursitis and female patients underwent revision surgery after bursectomy for olecranon bursitis more frequently. In addition, patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent flap surgery after bursectomy more frequently.

Spinal and paraspinal inflammatory reactions after epidural steroid injection in a patient taking disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

BackgroundDisease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are used in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are classified as conventional DMARDs and biologic agents. A concern with DMARDs is the increased risk of infection after surgery. A practice advisory from the American Society of Anesthesiologists recommend alternatives to neuraxial injections in patients who are immunocompromized. We describe a patient who was on several DMARDs and developed inflammatory reactions in her bilateral paraspinal muscles and lumbar spine after an epidural steroid injection (ESI). CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 79-year-old woman; she was taking methotrexate, adalimumab and prednisone for her RA. She had a left L5-S1 paramedian ESI for her L5 radiculitis. After relief of her back and radicular pain for 5 weeks, she had an acute exacerbation of her back pain. MRI showed bilateral paraspinal fluid accumulations and enhancement in her ligamentum flavum. Cultures of the aspirated fluid and biopsy specimens were negative for fungal, aerobic and anaerobic organisms. A repeat MRI 2 months later showed diminution of the fluid collection but with a new fluid accumulation near the left L4-5 facet and left L4 pedicle. Repeat cultures and gram stain of the specimens taken from the pedicle and the paraspinal muscles were negative. The patient was followed by her rheumatologist and in the pain clinic until resolution of her symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Several society guidelines recommend the continuation of methotrexate but stoppage of the biologic DMARDS before surgery. The occurrence of an intense inflammatory reaction after an ESI in our patient calls for additional research on the subject and shared decision-making between the pain physician, patient and rheumatologist especially in patients on several DMARDs.

Pre-operative withholding of infliximab and the risk of infections after major surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Withholding TNF inhibitors (TNFI) before surgery has been recommended due to concern for post-operative infection. We examined the risks of post-operative infections and mortality in patients with RA in relation to the pre-operative timing of infliximab infusion.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we used US Medicare claims data from 2007 to 2015 to identify patients with RA who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic or vascular surgery, or bowel resection, and who were treated with infliximab in the 90 days prior to surgery. We examined associations between the timing of infusion and infections and mortality in the 30 days after surgery. We adjusted for the predicted probability of post-operative infection or death, demographic characteristics, use of MTX, post-operative blood transfusion and hospital volume.

RESULTS

We studied 712 patients with CABG, 244 patients with vascular surgery and 862 patients with bowel resections. Post-operative pneumonia occurred in 7.4-11.9%, urinary tract infection in 9.0-15.2%, surgical site infection in 3.2-18.9%, sepsis in 4.2-9.6% and death in 3.5-7.0% among surgery cohorts. There was no association between the time from last infliximab dose to surgery and the risk of post-operative infection or mortality in any surgical cohort. No subgroups were identified that had an increased risk of infection with more proximate use of infliximab.

CONCLUSION

Among elderly patients with RA, risks of infection and mortality after major surgery were not related to the pre-operative timing of infliximab infusion.

Anti-rheumatic treatment and prosthetic joint infection: an observational study in 494 elective hip and knee arthroplasties

Background

Surgical site infections are more frequent among patients with rheumatic disease. To what extent this is related to immunosuppressive antirheumatic drugs is unclear, as is the value of discontinuing medication perioperatively. The aim of study was to assess the rate of surgical site infections after knee and hip replacement in patients with inflammatory joint disease, with an emphasis on periprosthetic joint infection, and to investigate the influence of treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in this regard.

Methods

Data were collected from 494 primary elective hip (51.4%) and knee arthroplasties, along with demographic and medication data. The primary outcome was surgical site infection during the first year after surgery.

Results

In 78% (n = 385) of the cases the patient used 1 to 3 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs perioperatively. Thirty-two percent (n = 157) of patients used a TNF-alpha inhibitor. The rate of surgical site infection was 3.8% (n = 19). The rate of periprosthetic joint infection was 1.4% (n = 7), all of which occurred after knee arthroplasty. Periprosthetic joint infection occurred in only 1 patient medicating perioperatively with a TNF-alpha inhibitor.

Conclusion

Surgical site infections were not associated with ongoing medication with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Due to the low event rate this should be interpreted with caution, but our center will maintain its routine of continuing treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors perioperatively.

Perioperative management of immunosuppression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at increased risk of infection after surgery. Recent literature has provided more data and updated guidelines to guide the management of immunosuppression in the perioperative period.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies over the past few years have confirmed that patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at increased risk of infection after surgery. Patients treated with biologics are at greater risk of postoperative infection, but this risk might be explained by the comorbidities and greater disease severity often seen in these patients. Recent observational studies have suggested that interruption of biologic therapies before surgery may not be associated with better outcomes. Glucocorticoids, however, have consistently been found to be risk factors for infection. Recent guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons recommend continuing conventional disease-modifying drugs and holding biologics for one dosing interval before surgery.

SUMMARY

Prolonged interruption of conventional and biologic therapies before surgery does not appear to substantially reduce infection risk. Guidelines now recommend continuing conventional DMARDs and holding biologics for just one dosing interval before surgery. Glucocorticoids are strongly associated with the risk of postoperative infection and should be minimized before surgery.

Prevention of Infection in the Perioperative Setting in Patients with Rheumatic Disease Treated with Immunosuppression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease are at increased risk of infection after surgery. The goal of this manuscript is to review current evidence on important contributors to infection risk in these patients and the optimal management of immunosuppression in the perioperative setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have confirmed that patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), are at increased risk of infection after surgery, with most evidence coming from studies of joint replacement surgery. Immunosuppression, disease activity, comorbidities, demographics, and surgeon and hospital volume are all important contributors to post-operative infection risk. Recently published guidelines regarding immunosuppression management before joint replacement recommend continuing the conventional disease-modifying drugs used to treat RA (e.g., methotrexate) without interruption, holding more potent conventional therapies for 1 week unless the underlying disease is severe, and holding biologic therapies for one dosing interval before surgery. Recent observational data suggests that holding biologics may not have a substantial impact on infection risk. These data also implicate glucocorticoids as a major contributor to post-operative infection risk. Observational data supports recent recommendations to continue many therapies in the perioperative period with only short interruptions of biologics and other potent immunosuppression. Even brief interruptions may not significantly lower risk, although the field continues to evolve. Clinicians should also consider other risk factors and should focus on minimizing glucocorticoids before surgery when possible to limit the risk of post-operative infection.

2018 update of the APLAR recommendations for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

AIM

To update recommendations based on current best evidence concerning the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), focusing particularly on the role of targeted therapies, to inform clinicians on new developments that will impact their current practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of relevant literature from 2014 to 2016 concerning targeted therapies in RA was conducted. The RA Update Working Group evaluated the evidence and proposed updated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach, to describe the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Recommendations were finalized through consensus using the Delphi technique.

RESULTS

This update provides 16 RA treatment recommendations based on current best evidence and expert clinical opinion. Recommendations 1-3 deal with the use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The next three recommendations (4-6) cover the need for screening and management of infections and comorbid conditions prior to starting targeted therapy, while the following seven recommendations focus on use of these agents. We address choice of targeted therapy, switch, tapering and discontinuation. The last three recommendations elaborate on targeted therapy for RA in special situations such as pregnancy, cancer, and major surgery.

CONCLUSION

Rheumatoid arthritis remains a significant health problem in the Asia-Pacific region. Patients with RA can benefit from the availability of effective targeted therapies, and these updated recommendations provide clinicians with guidance on their use.