High patient global assessment scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis otherwise in remission do not reflect subclinical inflammation

The impact of periodontitis and periodontal treatment on rheumatoid arthritis outcomes: an exploratory clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Studies suggest RA patients could benefit from periodontal treatment. However, published data are inconsistent, and there is a need for better-controlled research. Our study aims to address these limitations.

METHODS

In this exploratory randomized delayed-start study, 22 RA patients with moderate/severe periodontitis were subjected to full-mouth debridement. Periodontal and rheumatological assessments, including measuring anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 2 (CCP2) IgG levels, were performed at baseline (V1), 2 months (V2) and 6 months (V3) after steps 1 and 2 of periodontal therapy. Primary outcome was changes in DAS for 28 joints (DAS28) between V2 and V1. Secondary outcomes were changes in other rheumatological or periodontal clinical parameters (V2 or V3-V1).

RESULTS

RA disease activity was significantly higher in RA patients with severe periodontitis compared with moderate periodontitis at baseline, with significant positive correlations between several rheumatological and periodontal parameters. After periodontal treatment, RA patients with severe, but not moderate, periodontitis demonstrated significant improvements in DAS28 (ΔV2-V1, P = 0.042; ΔV3-V1, P = 0.001) and significant reduction in anti-CCP2 IgG levels at V3 (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Periodontal treatment is locally effective in patients with RA and impacts RA disease activity and anti-CCP2 antibody levels in patients with severe periodontitis. Hence, our data suggest that periodontal assessment and treatment should be integrated in the management of RA patients within a treat-to-target strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.com, http://www.isrctn.com, ISRCTN 17950307.

PASSing to the patient side: early achieving of an acceptable symptom state in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with Janus kinase inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

Patients Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is a single dichotomized question assessing health satisfaction. We aimed to investigate PASS achievement within 4 weeks of treatment with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (Jakinibs) and its association with treatment response after 4 and 12 weeks in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

We recruited consecutive RA patients starting baricitinib or tofacitinib. At baseline, 4 and 12 weeks, we calculated disease activity [Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28), Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index], disease status [remission and low-disease activity (LDA)], percentage of patients achieving PASS, and the time to attain PASS. We assessed the impact of clinically relevant variables on PASS achievement by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 113 patients [98 (86.7%) females; median age 59.6 (interquartile range 16.9), median disease duration 144 (132) months]. 90 (79.6%) patients achieved PASS after 10 (8) days. A similar percentage of PASS achievers and non-achievers was in remission/LDA at weeks 4 and 12, but the reduction of disease activity was significantly greater in PASS achievers. All patients achieving Boolean remission at weeks 4 and 12 had achieved PASS within 4 weeks. The impact of Patients Global Assessment (PGA) on DAS28 was significantly greater in PASS non-achievers compared to PASS achievers; inversely, the impact of C-reactive protein was more relevant in PASS achievers. At multivariate analysis, pain and PGA were significantly associated with PASS.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, Jakinibs allowed an early achievement of PASS in a great percentage of RA patients. PASS is strictly dependent on PGA and pain and could suggest, early in the management of RA patients, therapeutic success.

Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 2024 update

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease with destructive arthritis as its main clinical manifestation, which is a major cause of disability. It is very important to formulate and update a guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of RA that adhere to international guideline development standards and can be applied to clinical practice in China. This guideline is endorsed and developed by the National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, collaborated with Rheumatologists Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Rheumatology Rehabilitation Branch of Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rheumatology Branch of Chinese Research Hospital Association, and Rheumatology Branch of Beijing Association of Holistic Integrative Medicine, based on grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) and reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare (RIGHT). Evidence-based recommendation were developed for 10 clinical scenario that are most relevant to Chinese rheumatologists, aiming to improve and standardize the diagnosis and treatment of RA in China, which may finally improve the quality of life and prognosis of patients.

Remission versus low disease activity as treatment targets in rheumatoid arthritis: how to strike the right balance between too strict and too lenient targets? A meta-epidemiological study of individual patient data

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of using Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)-LDA (low disease activity) versus different definitions of remission as a treatment target in established rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A meta-epidemiological study of individual patient data from eight randomised controlled trials was performed. Four definitions of the target were considered at 6 months: (1) SDAI-LDA: SDAI≤11; (2) SDAI-Remission: SDAI≤3.3; (3) 4V-Remission: Tender and swollen 28-joint counts and C reactive protein (mg/dL) all ≤1 and patient global assessment (PGA)≤2 and (4) 3-variable (3V)-Remission: as 4V, excluding PGA. The mean radiographic change in the modified total Sharp-van der Heijde score (mTSS) and the Good Radiographic Outcome rates (defined as a change of ≤0.5 units mTSS) over 2 years were compared among target definitions. Radiographic progression and the distribution of the individual criteria of the Boolean definition in the only LDA subgroup (3.3

RESULTS

In total, 4374 patients (mean disease duration of 5.9 years (95% CI 4.6; 7.1)) were included. The pooled rate of SDAI-LDA at 6 months was 49%, with 13% in SDAI-remission. The 4V-Remission and 3V-Remission were achieved by 16% and 23%, respectively. Mean radiographic progression was 0.55 (0.14; 0.96) units for SDAI-LDA and 0.22 (-0.09; 0.54), 0.28 (-0.07; 0.62), 0.28 (-0.10; 0.65) for SDAI-Remission, 4V-Remission and 3V-Remission states, respectively. Patients with SDAI Pure-LDA presented significantly more radiographic progression than patients in SDAI-Remission (mean 0.72 vs 0.22 units, p<0.05). Over 53% of all patients achieving SDAI-LDA were not in 3V-Remission and had more mean radiographic progression over 2 years than those who met both targets (0.70 vs 0.25 units, p=0.014). Among patients with SDAI-LDA but not in SDAI-Remission, 40% scored PGA>2, reflecting relevant disease impact.

CONCLUSION

SDAI-LDA is associated with more structural damage over 2 years than any of the definitions of remission. It also allows substantial disease impact to go unchecked and uncontrolled. Physicians should strive for remission whenever possible and safe while also taking into account the different individual disease activity parameters included in the adopted definition.

Collapse

Key Words

• Outcome Assessment, Health Care
• Patient Reported Outcome Measures
• Rheumatoid Arthritis

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy
• Remission Induction
• Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use
• Treatment Outcome
• Severity of Illness Index
• Disease Progression
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
• Female
• Male
• Middle Aged

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Catia Duarte Rheumatology, ULS de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Johannes W G Jacobs Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC, Utrecht, Netherlands
Ricardo J O Ferreira Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Higher School of Nursing of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal Higher School of Nursing of Coimbra Health Sciences Research Unit Nursing, Coimbra, Portugal
Paco M J Welsing Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC, Utrecht, Netherlands
Laure Gossec INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France APHP, Rheumatology Department, Hopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
Pedro M Machado Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK
Désirée van der Heijde Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Jose Antonio Pereira da Silva Rheumatology, ULS de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Collapse

Remission definitions guiding immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: which is best fitted for the purpose?

OBJECTIVE

To assess which definition of remission best predicts good radiographic outcome (GRO) and good functional outcome (GFO) in rheumatoid arthritis, focusing the updated American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Meta-analyses of individual patient data (IPD) from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Six definitions of remission were considered: (1) Boolean with Patient Global Assessment (PGA)≤1 (Boolean); (2) Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)≤3.3; (3) Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)≤2.8; (4) Boolean with PGA≤2 (Updated-Boolean); (5) Boolean with Physician Global Assessment (PhGA≤1) replacing PGA (Boolean-PhGA) and (6) Boolean excluding PGA (3VBoolean). GRO was defined as a worsening ≤0.5 units in radiographic score and GFO as a no worsening in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), that is, ∆HAQ-DI≤0.0 units. Relationships between each remission definition at 6 and/or 12 months and GRO and GFO during the second year were analysed. Pooled probabilities for each outcome for each definition and their predictive accuracy were estimated.

RESULTS

IPD from eight RCTs (n=4423) were analysed. Boolean, SDAI, CDAI, Updated-Boolean, Boolean-PhGA and 3VBoolean were achieved by 24%, 27%, 28%, 32%, 33% and 43% of all patients, respectively. GRO among patients achieving remission ranged from 82.4% (3VBoolean) to 83.9% (SDAI). 3VBoolean showed the highest predictive accuracy for GRO: 51.1% versus 38.8% (Boolean) and 44.1% (Updated-Boolean). The relative risk of GFO ranged from 1.16 (Boolean) to 1.05 (3VBoolean). However, the proportion of GFO correctly predicted was highest for the 3VBoolean (50.3%) and lowest for the Boolean (43.8%).

CONCLUSION

3VBoolean definition provided the most accurate prediction of GRO and GFO, avoiding the risk of overtreatment in a substantial proportion of patients without increment in radiographic damage progression, supporting the proposal that 3VBoolean remission is preferable to guide immunosuppressive treatment. The patient's perspective, which must remain central, is best served by an additional patient-oriented target: a dual-target approach.

Register-based observational study of associations between inflammatory remission, formal treatment targets and the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs among patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess associations between inflammatory remission, formal treatment targets and the likelihood of starting a new disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), among patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Patients newly diagnosed with RA were identified in the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (n=11 784). Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and DMARD-treatment were assessed at RA diagnosis and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter. Inflammatory remission was defined as: swollen joints (0-28)=0 and C reactive protein <10 mg/L and normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The primary treatment target was DAS28 remission (<2.6). The proportion of patients in inflammatory remission who failed to reach DAS28 targets was assessed at each follow-up visit, and their likelihood of starting a new DMARD was compared with patients in inflammatory remission who reached the treatment target. rate ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were estimated with modified Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 34%, 39%, 44% and 47% were in inflammatory remission at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Among these, 20%, 22%, 20% and 19%, respectively, failed to reach DAS28 remission. Patients who failed to reach DAS28 remission despite being in inflammatory remission were more likely to start a new DMARD treatment (RR (95% CI) at 6 months=1.59 (1.29 to 1.96), 12 months=1.52 (1.23 to 1.87)) and 24 months=1.47 (1.20 to 1.80).

CONCLUSION

Failing to reach formal treatment targets, despite being in inflammatory remission, is common among patients with early RA, and is associated with an increased likelihood of starting a new DMARD-treatment.

MITIG.RA: study protocol of a tailored psychological intervention for managing fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite remarkable medical advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a subset of patients fails to achieve complete clinical remission, as the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of disease activity remains above 1, even after the inflammatory process is brought under control. This so-called state of 'PGA-near-remission' negatively impacts individuals' functioning and potentiates inadequate care. Fatigue is a distressing and disabling symptom frequently reported by patients in PGA-near-remission, and its management remains challenging. While classic cognitive-behavioural interventions show some benefits in managing fatigue, there is potential for improvement. Recently, contextual-cognitive behavioural therapies (CCBT), like mindfulness, acceptance, and compassion-based interventions, have shown promising results in fatigue-associated disorders and their determinants. This study primarily aims to examine the efficacy of the Compassion and Mindfulness Intervention for RA (MITIG.RA), a novel intervention combining different components of CCBT, compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU) in the management of RA-associated fatigue. Secondary aims involve exploring whether MITIG.RA produces changes in the perceived impact of disease, satisfaction with disease status, levels of depression, and emotion-regulation skills.

METHODS

This is a single center, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Patients will be screened for eligibility and willingness to participate and will be assessed and randomized to the experimental (MITIG.RA + TAU) or control condition (TAU) using computer randomization. MITIG.RA will be delivered by a certified psychologist and comprises eight sessions of 2 h, followed by two booster sessions. Outcomes will be assessed through validated self-report measures, including fatigue (primary outcome), perceived impact of disease, depressive symptoms, mindfulness, self-compassion, safety, and satisfaction (secondary outcomes). Assessment will take place at baseline, post-intervention, before the first and second booster sessions (weeks 12 and 20, respectively), and at 32 and 44 weeks after the interventions' beginning.

DISCUSSION

We expect MITIG.RA to be effective in reducing levels of RA-associated fatigue. Secondarily, we hypothesize that the experimental group will show improvements in the overall perceived impact of disease, emotional distress, and emotion regulation skills. Our findings will contribute to determine the benefits of combining CCBT approaches for managing fatigue and associated distress in RA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05389189. Registered on May 25, 2022.

Remission, response, retention and persistence to treatment with disease-modifying agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a study of harmonised Swedish, Danish and Norwegian cohorts

OBJECTIVE

Precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires a good understanding of treatment outcomes and often collaborative efforts that call for data harmonisation. We aimed to describe how harmonisation across study cohorts can be achieved and investigate how the observed proportions reaching remission vary across remission criteria, study types, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and countries, and how they relate to other treatment outcomes.

METHODS

We used data from eight existing large-scale, clinical RA registers and a pragmatic trial from Sweden, Denmark and Norway. In these, we defined three types of treatment cohorts; methotrexate monotherapy (as first DMARD), tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) (as first biological DMARD) and rituximab. We developed a harmonised study protocol defining time points during 36 months of follow-up, collected clinical visit data on treatment response, retention, persistence and six alternative definitions of remission, and investigated how these outcomes differed within and between cohorts, by treatment.

RESULTS

Cohort sizes ranged from ~50 to 22 000 patients with RA. The proportions reaching each outcome varied across outcome metric, but with small to modest variations within and between cohorts, countries and treatment. Retention and persistence rates were high (>50% at 1 year), yet <33% of patients starting methotrexate or TNFi, and only 10% starting rituximab, remained on drug without other DMARDs added and achieved American Congress of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology or Simplified Disease Activity Index remission at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Harmonisation of data from different RA data sources can be achieved without compromising internal validity or generalisability. The low proportions reaching remission, point to an unmet need for treatment optimisation in RA.

Trajectories of self-reported pain-related health outcomes and longitudinal effects on medication use in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort analysis using the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD)

OBJECTIVE

To determine distinct trajectories of self-reported pain-related health status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), their relationship with sociodemographic factors and medication use.

METHODS

988 Australian Rheumatology Association Database participants with RA (71% female, mean age 54 years, mean disease duration 2.3 years) were included. Distinct multi-trajectories over 15-year follow-up for five different self-reported pain-related health outcome measures (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, visual analogue scores for pain, arthritis, global health and the Assessment of Quality of Life utility index) were identified using latent variable discrete mixture modelling. Random effects models were used to determine associations with medication use and biologic therapy modification during follow-up.

RESULTS

Four, approximately equally sized, pain/health status groups were identified, ranging from 'better' to 'poorer', within which changes over time were relatively small. Important determinants of those with poorer pain/health status included female gender, obesity, smoking, socioeconomic indicators and comorbidities. While biologic therapy use was similar between groups during follow-up, biologic therapy modifications (p_linear<0.001) and greater tendency of non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor use (p_linear<0.001) were observed in those with poorer pain/health status. Similarly, greater use of opioids, prednisolone and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was seen in those with poorer pain/health status.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of disease activity information, distinct trajectories of varying pain/health status were seen from the outset and throughout the disease course in this RA cohort. More biologic therapy modifications and greater use in anti-inflammatories, opioids and prednisolone were seen in those with poorer pain/health status, reflecting undesirable lived experience of persistent pain in RA.

Exercise Self-Efficacy and patient global assessment were associated with 6-min walk test distance in persons with rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Low functional capacity is related to future loss of daily function and cardiovascular events. The present study explored the associations of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and disease-specific measures with functional capacity as measured by the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Seventy-nine participants from rheumatology outpatient clinics were included. The distance walked during the 6MWT (6MWD) was the dependent variable in multivariable regression analyses. Model 1 included the independent variables sex, age (in tertiles to improve model fit), and body mass index (BMI). Building on Model 1, Model 2 added smoking, patient global assessment (PGA), Exercise Self-Efficacy, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale's Depression score, and Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale score, whereas Model 3 added smoking, disease duration, present use of glucocorticosteroids, seropositivity, Disease Activity Score 28-C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP), and a comorbidity variable.

RESULTS

Median age was 65 years, 76% were female, and median 6MWD was 493 m. In Model 1, BMI and age were significantly associated with the 6MWD (R2 = 0.42). In Model 2, PGA and Exercise Self-Efficacy were also significantly associated with the 6MWD, with standardized regression coefficients of - 0.21 (p = 0.03) and 0.26 (p = 0.004) respectively (R2 = 0.54). The RA-specific variables in Model 3 were not significantly associated with the 6MWD (R2 = 0.49).

CONCLUSION

The PROMs PGA and Exercise Self-Efficacy were significantly associated with functional capacity as measured by the 6MWT in persons with RA, whereas disease-specific measures such as DAS28-CRP and disease duration were not. Key Points • Functional capacity measured with the 6-minute walk test was significantly associated with body mass index, age, patient global assessment, and Exercise Self-Efficacy in persons with RA. • Patient-reported outcome measures explained more of the variation in functional capacity than objective or composite measures of disease and are relevant measures in clinical follow-up. • Techniques that enhance self-efficacy for exercise should be incorporated into clinical practice to promote physical activity.

Sustained DMARD-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis - about concepts and moving towards practice

Sustained DMARD-free remission (SDFR) is the best possible outcome in RA. It is characterized by sustained absence of clinical arthritis, which is accompanied by resolution of symptoms and restoration of normal physical functioning. Therefore it's the best proxy for cure in RA. The mechanisms underlying SDFR-development are yet unidentified. Hypothetically, there are two possible scenarios. The first hypothesis is based on the concept of regaining immune-tolerance, which implies that RA-patients are similar at diagnosis and that disease-processes during the disease-course shift into a favorable direction, resulting in regaining a state in which arthritis is persistently absent. This could imply that SDFR is theoretically achievable for all RA-patients. The alternative hypothesis is that RA-patients who achieve SDFR are intrinsically different from those who cannot. This would imply that DMARD-cessation could be restricted to a subgroup of RA-patients. Since the 1990s, DMARD-discontinuation and SDFR have been increasingly studied as long-term-outcome in RA. In this review, we describe hitherto results of clinical, genetic, serological, histological and imaging studies and looked for arguments for the first or second hypothesis in both auto-antibody-positive and auto-antibody-negative RA. In auto-antibody-negative RA, SDFR is presumably restricted to a subgroup of patients with high serological-markers of inflammation at diagnosis and a rapid and sustained decrease in inflammation after treatment-start. Identifying these RA-patients could be helpful in realizing personalized-medicine. In auto-antibody-positive RA, only few patients achieve SDFR and no definite conclusions can be drawn, but data could suggest that SDFR-patients might be a subgroup with relatively low inflammation from disease-presentation onwards.

Remission or Not Remission, That's the Question: Shedding Light on Remission and the Impact of Objective and Subjective Measures Reflecting Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Introduction

The inclusion of certain variables in remission formulas for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may give rise to discrepancies. An increase in patient global assessment (PGA), a variable showing the patient's self-evaluation of their disease activity, may alone tilt a patient out of remission when using certain remission-assessing methods. This study aimed to explore differences in remission rates among various formulas and the impact of PGA and other clinical variables on the calculation of remission.

Methods

Data were collected from RA patients monitored during the years 2015–2019 at an outpatient clinic in southern Norway. Linear and logistic regression assessed associations between PGA, other RA-related variables, and remission-assessing methods.

Results

Remission rates were 23%, 65%, and 73% in 2019 when assessing the same 502 RA patients using Boolean remission, Boolean remission without PGA, and the disease activity score (DAS) with C-reactive peptide [DAS28(3)-CRP] method, respectively. Among the same population that year, 27% reported PGA ≤ 10, 74% had a tender joint count of ≤ 1, 85% had a swollen joint count of ≤ 1, and 86% had CRP ≤ 10. Pain (standardized coefficient β = 0.7, p < 0.001) was most strongly associated with PGA. Pain, fatigue, and morning stiffness were substantially associated with the remission-assessing methods that incorporated PGA.

Conclusions

Since PGA is strongly associated with the patient’s perception of pain and may not reflect the inflammatory process, our study challenges the application of remission-assessing methods containing PGA when monitoring RA patients in the outpatient clinic. We recommend using measures that are less likely to be associated with noninflammatory pain and psychosocial factors.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00490-5.

Controversies in rheumatology: Ultrasound for monitoring of RA - do we need it?

Clinical joint examination is the cornerstone for evaluation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, since large discrepancies have been shown even between experienced rheumatologists in evaluation of joint inflammation, and tender joints may have limited value in reflecting inflammation, ultrasound has in the last decennials been introduced in the clinical assessments of RA patients. Ultrasound has high accordance with other imaging modalities and enables detection of clinically difficult pathologies and contributes to assessments of joints difficult to evaluate clinically. However, there is no general agreement on the optimal use of ultrasound in rheumatology and the prevalence of machines as well as the level of experience is highly different across the countries. In addition, standardized use of ultrasound in treat-to-target follow-up of RA patients was found not to have any added value. Thus, how to use ultrasound in monitoring of RA patients is open for debate. The present article will discuss the pros and cons for using ultrasound in the clinical setting.

Pathway Phenotypes Underpinning Depression, Anxiety, and Chronic Fatigue Symptoms Due to Acute Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Precision Nomothetic Psychiatry Analysis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory and autoimmune disorder which affects the joints in the wrists, fingers, and knees. RA is often associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms as well as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)-like symptoms. This paper examines the association between depressive symptoms (measured with the Beck Depression Inventory, BDI), anxiety (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAMA), CFS-like (Fibro-fatigue Scale) symptoms and immune-inflammatory, autoimmune, and endogenous opioid system (EOS) markers, and lactosylcer-amide (CD17) in RA. The serum biomarkers were assayed in 118 RA and 50 healthy controls. Results were analyzed using the new precision nomothetic psychiatry approach. We found significant correlations between the BDI, FF, and HAMA scores and severity of RA, as assessed with the DAS28-4, clinical and disease activity indices, the number of tender and swollen joints, and patient and evaluator global assessment scores. Partial least squares analysis showed that 69.7% of the variance in this common core underpinning psychopathology and RA symptoms was explained by immune-inflammatory pathways, rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, CD17, and mu-opioid receptor levels. We constructed a new endophenotype class comprising patients with very high immune-inflammatory markers, CD17, RA, affective and CF-like symptoms, and tobacco use disorder. We extracted a reliable and replicable latent vector (pathway phenotype) from immune data, psychopathology, and RA-severity scales. Depression, anxiety, and CFS-like symptoms due to RA are manifestations of the phenome of RA and are mediated by the effects of the same immune-inflammatory, autoimmune, and other pathways that underpin the pathophysiology of RA.

Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate limiting factors of American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR Boolean remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compare patients who fulfil the criteria to patients who only partly fulfil the criteria, with respect to imaging inflammation and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) usage.

METHODS

Patients with DMARD-naïve RA were treated according to current recommendations in the the ARCTIC trial (Aiming for Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial examining the benefit of ultrasound in a Clinical TIght Control regimen). Limiting factors of reaching ACR/EULAR Boolean remission at 2 years were assessed. Imaging inflammation (ultrasound and MRI) in patients in remission was compared with patients failing to fulfil different components of the criteria. The OR of biologic therapy was calculated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 203 patients, 112 (55%) reached ACR/EULAR Boolean remission; 49 (24%) fulfilled three of four criteria. The main limiting factors were patient global assessment (PGA) (59%) and tender joints (22%). Imaging inflammation was not significantly different for patients in remission and patients not fulfilling the criteria due to elevated PGA and/or tender joints, but higher odds of using biologics (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.73 to 7.61) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PGA and tender joints were the factors most often limiting achievement of ACR/EULAR Boolean remission. The level of imaging inflammation was not elevated in these patients compared with patients in remission, but the odds of using biologic DMARDs were higher.

Treating-to-target in rheumatology: Theory and practice

Despite its inclusion in current treatment recommendations, adherence to the treat-to-target strategy (T2T) is still poor. Among the issues are the definition(s) of target, especially the caveats of the patient global assessment (PGA), included in all recommended definitions of remission. The PGA is poorly related to inflammation, especially at low levels of disease activity, rather being a measure of the disease impact. Up to 60% of all patients otherwise in remission still score PGA at >1 and as high as 10. These patients (PGA-near-remission) are exposed to overtreatment if current recommendations are strictly followed and will continue to endure significant impact, unless adjuvant measures are implemented. A proposed method to overcome both these risks is to systematically pursue two targets: one focused on the disease process (the biological target) and another focused on the symptoms and impact (the impact target), the dual-target strategy. Candidate instruments to define each of these targets are discussed.