1
|
López CL, Calvo M, Cámara JC, García-Paredes B, Gómez-Martin C, López AM, Pazo-Cid R, Sastre J, Yaya R, Feliu J. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for the management of hepatocarcinoma patients (2023). Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:2800-2811. [PMID: 38914756 PMCID: PMC11467113 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03568-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy in the liver and is the third cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Surveillance with abdominal ultrasound should be offered to individuals at high risk for developing HCC. Accurate diagnosis, staging, and liver function are crucial when determining the optimal therapeutic approach. The BCLC staging system is widely endorsed in Western countries. Managing this pathology requires a multidisciplinary, personalized approach, generally with a multimodal strategy. Surgery remains the only curative option, albeit local and systemic therapy may also increase survival when surgery is not suitable. In advanced disease, systemic treatment should be offered to patients with ECOG/PS 0-1 and Child-Pugh class A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos López López
- Medical Oncology Department, H. U. Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, UNICAN, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
| | - Mariona Calvo
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia-L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Cámara
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Carlos Gómez-Martin
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana María López
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
| | - Roberto Pazo-Cid
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Javier Sastre
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Yaya
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituvo Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERONC, UAM, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cerrito L, Ainora ME, Cuccia G, Galasso L, Mignini I, Esposto G, Garcovich M, Riccardi L, Gasbarrini A, Zocco MA. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Prediction of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Systemic and Locoregional Therapies. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:551. [PMID: 38339302 PMCID: PMC10854581 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver cancer and the sixth most common malignant tumor in the world, with an incidence of 2-8% per year in patients with hepatic cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis. Despite surveillance schedules, it is sometimes diagnosed at an advanced stage, requiring complex therapeutic efforts with both locoregional and systemic treatments. Traditional radiological tools (computed tomography and magnetic resonance) are used for the post-treatment follow-up of HCC. The first follow-up imaging is performed at 4 weeks after resection or locoregional treatments, or after 3 months from the beginning of systemic therapies, and subsequently every 3 months for the first 2 years. For this reason, these radiological methods do not grant the possibility of an early distinction between good and poor therapeutic response. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) have gained the interest of several researchers for their potential role in the early assessment of response to locoregional treatments (chemoembolization) or antiangiogenic therapies in patients with advanced HCC. In fact, DCE-US, through a quantitative analysis performed by specific software, allows the construction of time-intensity curves, providing an evaluation of the parameters related to neoplastic tissue perfusion and its potential changes following therapies. It has the invaluable advantage of being easily repeatable, minimally invasive, and able to grant important evaluations regarding patients' survival, essential for well-timed therapeutic changes in case of unsatisfying response, and eventual further treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Cerrito
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.E.A.); (G.C.); (G.E.); (M.G.); (L.R.); (A.G.)
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Maria Elena Ainora
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.E.A.); (G.C.); (G.E.); (M.G.); (L.R.); (A.G.)
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Giuseppe Cuccia
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.E.A.); (G.C.); (G.E.); (M.G.); (L.R.); (A.G.)
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Linda Galasso
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Irene Mignini
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Giorgio Esposto
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.E.A.); (G.C.); (G.E.); (M.G.); (L.R.); (A.G.)
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Matteo Garcovich
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.E.A.); (G.C.); (G.E.); (M.G.); (L.R.); (A.G.)
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Laura Riccardi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.E.A.); (G.C.); (G.E.); (M.G.); (L.R.); (A.G.)
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.E.A.); (G.C.); (G.E.); (M.G.); (L.R.); (A.G.)
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| | - Maria Assunta Zocco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy (M.E.A.); (G.C.); (G.E.); (M.G.); (L.R.); (A.G.)
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.G.); (I.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar A, Acharya SK, Singh SP, Duseja A, Madan K, Shukla A, Arora A, Anand AC, Bahl A, Soin AS, Sirohi B, Dutta D, Jothimani D, Panda D, Saini G, Varghese J, Kumar K, Premkumar M, Panigrahi MK, Wadhawan M, Sahu MK, Rela M, Kalra N, Rao PN, Puri P, Bhangui P, Kar P, Shah SR, Baijal SS, Shalimar, Paul SB, Gamanagatti S, Gupta S, Taneja S, Saraswat VA, Chawla YK. 2023 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Management of Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Puri III Recommendations. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2024; 14:101269. [PMID: 38107186 PMCID: PMC10724697 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents significant treatment challenges despite considerable advancements in its management. The Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver (INASL) first published its guidelines to aid healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC in 2014. These guidelines were subsequently updated in 2019. However, INASL has recognized the need to revise its guidelines in 2023 due to recent rapid advancements in the diagnosis and management of HCC, particularly for intermediate and advanced stages. The aim is to provide healthcare professionals with evidence-based recommendations tailored to the Indian context. To accomplish this, a task force was formed, and a two-day round table discussion was held in Puri, Odisha. During this event, experts in their respective fields deliberated and finalized consensus statements to develop these updated guidelines. The 2023 INASL guidelines offer a comprehensive framework for the diagnosis, staging, and management of intermediate and advanced HCC in India. They represent a significant step forward in standardizing clinical practices nationwide, with the primary objective of ensuring that patients with HCC receive the best possible care based on the latest evidence. The guidelines cover various topics related to intermediate and advanced HCC, including biomarkers of aggressive behavior, staging, treatment options, and follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Kumar
- Institute of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110060, India
| | - Subrat K. Acharya
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KIIT University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
| | - Shivaram P. Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Dock Road, Manglabag, Cuttack, Odisha, 753 007, India
| | - Ajay Duseja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Kaushal Madan
- Clinical Hepatology, Max Hospitals, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Akash Shukla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GSMC & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, 400022, India
| | - Anil Arora
- Institute of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110060, India
| | - Anil C. Anand
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kushabhadra Campus (KIIT Campus-5), Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
| | - Ankur Bahl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Sector - 44, Opp. HUDA City Center, Gurugram, 122002, India
| | - Arvinder S. Soin
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta The Medicity, CH Baktawar Singh Road, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122 001, India
| | - Bhawna Sirohi
- Medical Oncology, BALCO Medical Centre, Raipur Chattisgarh, 493661, India
| | - Debnarayan Dutta
- Radiation Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Ponekkara, AIMS (P.O.), Kochi, 682041, India
| | - Dinesh Jothimani
- Department of Hepatology, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, #7, CLC Works Road, Chromepet, Chennai, 600044, India
| | - Dipanjan Panda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, 110076, India
| | - Gagan Saini
- Radiation Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super-Speciality Hospital, W-3, Ashok Marg, near Radisson Blu Hotel, Sector-1, Vaishali, Ghaziabad, 201012, India
| | - Joy Varghese
- Department of Hepatology & Transplant Hepatology, Gleneagles Global Health City, 439, Cheran Nagar, Perumbakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600100, India
| | - Karan Kumar
- Department of HPB Sciences and Liver Transplantation, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, RIICO Institutional Area, Sitapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, 302022, Rajasthan, India
| | - Madhumita Premkumar
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Manas K. Panigrahi
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, Odisha, India
| | - Manav Wadhawan
- Liver & Digestive Diseases Institute, Institute of Liver & Digestive Diseases, BLK Max Hospital, Delhi, 110 005, India
| | - Manoj K. Sahu
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, IMS & SUM Hospital, K8 Kalinga Nagar, Shampur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 003, India
| | - Mohamed Rela
- The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, #7, CLC Works Road, Chromepet, Chennai, 600044, India
| | - Naveen Kalra
- Department of Radio Diagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Padaki N. Rao
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, No. 6-3-661, Punjagutta Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 082, India
| | - Pankaj Puri
- Fortis Escorts Liver & Digestive Diseases Institute (FELDI), Fortis Escorts Heart Institute & Research Centre, Okhla Road, New Delhi, 110025, India
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta The Medicity, CH Baktawar Singh Road, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122 001, India
| | - Premashis Kar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201 012, India
| | - Samir R. Shah
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Intensive Care, Institute of Liver Disease, HPB Surgery and Transplant Global Hospitals, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Sanjay S. Baijal
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medanta The Medicity, CH Baktawar Singh Road, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122 001, India
| | - Shalimar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Shashi B. Paul
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Shivanand Gamanagatti
- Fortis Escorts Liver & Digestive Diseases Institute (FELDI), Fortis Escorts Heart Institute & Research Centre, Okhla Road, New Delhi, 110025, India
| | - Subash Gupta
- Centre for Liver & Biliary Sciences, Liver Transplant and Biliary Sciences, Robotic Surgery, Max Super Speciality Hospital, No. 1, 2, Press Enclave Road, Mandir Marg, Saket Institutional Area, Saket, New Delhi, Delhi, 110017, India
| | - Sunil Taneja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Vivek A. Saraswat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, RIICO Institutional Area, Sitapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, 302022, Rajasthan, India
| | - Yogesh K. Chawla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kushabhadra Campus (KIIT Campus-5), Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamzah N, Kassim NK, Omar J, Abdullah MS, Lee YY. Levels of PIVKA-II and alpha-fetoprotein in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma compared to healthy controls and predictive values of both markers with radiological responses after loco-regional interventions. PeerJ 2023; 11:e15988. [PMID: 37780370 PMCID: PMC10538296 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The significance of the current study was to determine normative levels of PIVKA-II and AFP in patients with unresectable HCC and healthy participants. The second goal was to assess the roles of PIVKA-II and AFP in predicting radiological response after loco-regional therapy. Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive samples of HCC patients and healthy controls. Venous blood samples were obtained at baseline and after interventions to determine serum levels of PIVKA-II and AFP using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay method. Radiologic responses were determined based on the WHO criteria. Results Fifty-four HCC patients (mean age 58.9 years, 49 males) and 40 healthy controls (mean age 33.5 years, 26 males) were recruited. The median serum levels of PIVKA-II and AFP in HCC vs. healthy controls were 988.4 vs. 24.2 mAU/ml and 13.6 vs. 1.7 ng/ml, respectively (both p < 0.001). With ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for PIVKA-II was 0.95 95% CI [0.90-0.99], and for AFP it was 0.98, 95% CI [0.95-1.0]). The cut-off value for PIVKA-II was 41.4 mAU/ml, and AFP was 4.8 ng/ml. PIVKA-II levels correlated significantly with radiological responses (r = 0.64, p = 0.02) but not AFP (r = 0.09, p = 0.2). Conclusion PIVKA-II and AFP levels are distinctive between unresectable HCC and healthy controls. However, PIVKA-II, not AFP, can predict the radiological response after loco-regional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norhanan Hamzah
- Department of Chemical Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Nur Karyatee Kassim
- Department of Chemical Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Julia Omar
- Department of Chemical Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Shafie Abdullah
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2023; 23:1-120. [PMID: 37384024 PMCID: PMC10202234 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA) and National Cancer Center (NCC) Korea
- Corresponding author: KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee (KPGRC) (Committee Chair: Joong-Won Park) Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea Tel. +82-31-920-1605, Fax: +82-31-920-1520, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vallati G, Trobiani C. Follow-Up (Response to Treatment, Clinical Management). TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION (TACE) 2023:131-141. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-36261-3_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
|
7
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:1126-1240. [PMID: 36447411 PMCID: PMC9747269 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
8
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28:583-705. [PMID: 36263666 PMCID: PMC9597235 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lucatelli P, Burrel M, Guiu B, de Rubeis G, van Delden O, Helmberger T. CIRSE Standards of Practice on Hepatic Transarterial Chemoembolisation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 44:1851-1867. [PMID: 34694454 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02968-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This CIRSE Standards of Practice document is aimed at interventional radiologists and provides best practices for performing transarterial chemoembolisation. It has been developed by an expert writing group under the guidance of the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. It will encompass all technical details reflecting European practice of different TACE procedures (Lp-TACE, DEM-TACE, DSM-TACE, b-TACE) as well as revising the existing literature on the various clinical indications (HCC, mCRC, ICC, NET). Finally, new frontiers of development will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierleone Lucatelli
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiological Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marta Burrel
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier School of Medicine, St-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Gianluca de Rubeis
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiological Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Otto van Delden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bogenhausen Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Follow-up of percutaneous microwave (MW) ablation of hepatic lesion: predictive value of CT at 24-h compared with CT at 1 month. Med Oncol 2020; 37:41. [PMID: 32266568 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-020-01364-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
To retrospectively assess the predictive value of the CT performed at 24 h, compared with the CT performed at 1 month, in the evaluation of the technical success of microwave (MW) ablation of hepatic lesions. In a single center, 50 patients with HCC underwent percutaneous MW ablation between November 2016 and March 2019. Each patient underwent a contrast-enhanced CT exam at 24 h and at 1 month after the procedure. For each patient, was assessed the presence or absence of residual disease, the appearance of a new lesion, complications, and the involvement of the hepatic capsule, both at 24-h and at 1 month. Overall correlation between residual disease, appearance of a new nodule and complications was also assessed. A total of 50 hepatic lesions were treated with US-guided MW ablation. Patients' mean age was 70.9 years (range 28-87 years). Mean nodule diameter was 17.6 mm (range 7-35 mm). Contingency tables and the χ2 test showed a strong association when looking at capsule involvement (accuracy: 100%), residual disease (accuracy: 90%; p-value 0.003), and the appearance of a new HCC nodule (accuracy: 88%; p-value 0.007); regarding complications, the accuracy was 78% (p-value 0.014). Optimal correlation was reached in 62% of cases, moderate correlation in 26%, minimum correlation in 10% of cases; no cases of zero correlation were recorded. CT at 24 h and 1 month showed comparable efficacy in evaluating residual disease after MW thermal ablation of liver lesions. However, further studies are needed to assess which factors may cause false-negative results at the 24-h CT.
Collapse
|
11
|
Guo Q, Chen M, Xu H, Lu T, Zhou H, Chen Y, Zong J, Xu Y, Chen B, Wang B, Zhu L, Pan J, Lin S. Oral Maintenance Chemotherapy Using S-1/Capecitabine in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients After Systemic Chemotherapy: A Single-Institution Experience. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:1387-1396. [PMID: 32158270 PMCID: PMC7049279 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s234271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In this study, we retrospectively evaluated a series of metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) patients who received oral maintenance chemotherapy using S-1/capecitabine after systemic chemotherapy and local radiation therapy, and aimed to explore potential efficient treatment strategies for this subset of patients. Patients and Methods Thirty-seven patients with mNPC (19 newly diagnosed metastatic patients and 18 metastatic cases after definitive chemoradiotherapy) who received the treatment strategies mentioned above were analyzed. Results After a median follow-up time of 37 months, the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 47.6% and 87.7%, respectively. The median time to progression was 27.6 months, while the median OS was not reached at time of last follow-up. The most common acute adverse events were hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity, and all were tolerable and curable. Conclusion Oral maintenance chemotherapy using S-1/capecitabine in mNPC patients after systemic chemotherapy could yield a superb outcome. Further multicenter prospective clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaojuan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Mengwei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hanchuan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianzhu Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Han Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanyan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingfeng Zong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Bijuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Bingyi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Lili Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhou H, Lu T, Guo Q, Chen Y, Chen M, Chen Y, Lin Y, Chen C, Ma L, Xu Y, Lin S, Pan J. Effects of oral maintenance chemotherapy and predictive value of circulating EBV DNA in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Med 2020; 9:2732-2741. [PMID: 32090498 PMCID: PMC7163084 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives Oral maintenance chemotherapy can effectively prolong overall survival (OS) in many types of metastatic cancer, but its role in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) is unclear. In this study, the efficacy of oral maintenance chemotherapy in mNPC and the effectiveness of circulating tumor EBV‐DNA for screening patients were evaluated. Methods Between June 2016 and December 2017, 141 patients with mNPC who received platinum‐based systemic chemotherapy were included (median follow‐up time, 21 months). Patients were classified into two groups according to the administration of oral maintenance chemotherapy. Plasma samples were collected before, during, and after treatment for the measurement of circulating EBV DNA. Results The 2‐year OS was higher for patients who received maintenance chemotherapy than for patients without maintenance chemotherapy (78.9% vs 62.7%, P = .016). Patients with undetectable posttreatment EBV‐DNA after 4‐6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (n = 73) had a higher 2‐year OS than that of patients with detectable EBV‐DNA (n = 68) (82.16% vs 51.45%, P = .001). For patients with undetectable posttreatment EBV‐DNA, OS was better for those with maintenance chemotherapy than for those without (86.7% vs 73%, P = .027). For patients with detectable posttreatment EBV‐DNA, maintenance chemotherapy did not improve outcomes (49.5% vs 55.4%, P = .824). The most common acute events were hematological toxicity, and all were tolerable and curable. Conclusions Oral maintenance chemotherapy with S1 or capecitabine can improve OS in mNPC. Posttreatment EBV‐DNA was not only an independent prognosis factor for mNPC but also can screen out beneficiaries of maintenance chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Tianzhu Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qiaojuan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Research, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mengwei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yansong Chen
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Research, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yingying Lin
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Research, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chuanben Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Liqin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital &, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kumar A, Acharya SK, Singh SP, Arora A, Dhiman RK, Aggarwal R, Anand AC, Bhangui P, Chawla YK, Datta Gupta S, Dixit VK, Duseja A, Kalra N, Kar P, Kulkarni SS, Kumar R, Kumar M, Madhavan R, Mohan Prasad V, Mukund A, Nagral A, Panda D, Paul SB, Rao PN, Rela M, Sahu MK, Saraswat VA, Shah SR, Shalimar, Sharma P, Taneja S, Wadhawan M. 2019 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri II Recommendations. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2020; 10:43-80. [PMID: 32025166 PMCID: PMC6995891 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure in patients with chronic liver disease in India. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) had published its first guidelines on diagnosis and management of HCC (The Puri Recommendations) in 2014, and these guidelines were very well received by the healthcare community involved in diagnosis and management of HCC in India and neighboring countries. However, since 2014, many new developments have taken place in the field of HCC diagnosis and management, hence INASL endeavored to update its 2014 consensus guidelines. A new Task Force on HCC was constituted that reviewed the previous guidelines as well as the recent developments in various aspects of HCC that needed to be incorporated in the new guidelines. A 2-day round table discussion was held on 5th and 6th May 2018 at Puri, Odisha, to discuss, debate, and finalize the revised consensus statements. Each statement of the guideline was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system with minor modifications. We present here the 2019 Update of INASL Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri-2 Recommendations.
Collapse
Key Words
- AFP, alpha-fetoprotein
- AIH, autoimmune hepatitis
- ALT, alanine aminotransferase
- DAA, direct-acting antiviral
- DALY, disability-adjusted life-year
- DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid
- GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation
- Gd-BOPTA, gadolinium benzyloxypropionictetraacetate
- Gd-EOB-DTPA, gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid
- HBV, hepatitis B virus
- HBeAg, hepatitis B envelope antigen
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HIV, human immunodeficiency virus
- IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer
- IFN, interferon
- INASL, Indian National Association for Study of the Liver
- MiRNA, micro-RNA
- NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
- NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
- PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K absence
- RFA
- RNA, ribonucleic acid
- SVR, sustained virological response
- TACE
- TACE, trans-arterial chemoembolization
- TARE, transarterial radioembolization
- TNF, tumor necrosis factor
- WHO, World Health Organization
- liver cancer
- targeted therapy
- transplant
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Kumar
- Institute of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110 060, India
| | - Subrat K. Acharya
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KIIT University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
| | - Shivaram P. Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Dock Road, Manglabag, Cuttack, Odisha, 753 007, India
| | - Anil Arora
- Institute of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110 060, India
| | - Radha K. Dhiman
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Rakesh Aggarwal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226 014, India
| | - Anil C. Anand
- Department of Gastroenterology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, 110 076, India
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta the Medicity, CH Baktawar Singh Road, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122 001, India
| | - Yogesh K. Chawla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kushabhadra Campus (KIIT Campus-5), Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751 024, India
| | - Siddhartha Datta Gupta
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Vinod K. Dixit
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221 005, India
| | - Ajay Duseja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Naveen Kalra
- Department of Radio Diagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Premashish Kar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201 012, India
| | - Suyash S. Kulkarni
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012, India
| | - Rakesh Kumar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Manoj Kumar
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, Sector D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India
| | - Ram Madhavan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Peeliyadu Road, Ponekkara, Edappally, Kochi, Kerala, 682 041, India
| | - V.G. Mohan Prasad
- Department of Gastroenterology, VGM Gastro Centre, 2100, Trichy Road, Rajalakshmi Mills Stop, Singanallur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 005, India
| | - Amar Mukund
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, Sector D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India
| | - Aabha Nagral
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre, 15, Dr Deshmukh Marg, Pedder Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 026, India
| | - Dipanjan Panda
- Department of Oncology, Institutes of Cancer, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, 110 076, India
| | - Shashi B. Paul
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Padaki N. Rao
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, No. 6-3-661, Punjagutta Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 082, India
| | - Mohamed Rela
- The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Gleneagles Global Health City, 439, Cheran Nagar, Perumbakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 100, India
| | - Manoj K. Sahu
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, IMS & SUM Hospital, K8 Kalinga Nagar, Shampur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 003, India
| | - Vivek A. Saraswat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226 014, India
| | - Samir R. Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre, 15, Dr Deshmukh Marg, Pedder Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 026, India
| | - Shalimar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Praveen Sharma
- Institute of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110 060, India
| | - Sunil Taneja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Manav Wadhawan
- Liver & Digestive Diseases Institute, Institute of Liver & Digestive Diseases, BLK Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, 110 005, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hepatitis viruses take advantage of traditional practices to increase the burden of hepatocellular carcinoma in Tunisia. Arch Virol 2019; 165:33-42. [PMID: 31630275 DOI: 10.1007/s00705-019-04440-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major public health issue in Africa. In Tunisia, hepatitis B virus (HBV) is known to be an important risk factor for HCC in the south of the country, but the role played by hepatitis C virus (HCV) still remains unclear. The aim of the current case-control study was to identify risk factors for HCC development in the northern part of the country. Clinical and biological data including viral hepatitis status (serological and molecular) and non-infectious risk factors from 73 patients with HCC and 70 control subjects without hepatic diseases were collected. The mean age of the patients was 63 ± 10 years, and the ratio of males to females was 1.1. HCC occurred in cirrhotic liver in 72.0% of the cases. HCV infection was the dominant risk factor (64.3% of cases); the presence of HBV was observed in 53.4% of the cases. Occult hepatitis B and C were implicated, respectively, in 30.1% and 9.6% of the cases. HCV genotype 1b was predominant. Patients originating from western Tunisia formed a homogeneous group, characterized by significantly higher rates of tattoos or scarifications (83%) and HCV infection (80%) than those from other parts of the country. Chronic HCV infection is currently the primary risk factor for HCC in Tunisia; HBV infection remains frequent in its overt or occult infection forms. Traditional esthetic practices apparently contribute to increasing the burden of terminal liver diseases in western Tunisia.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kornberg A, Friess H. 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for diagnosis of HCC: implications for therapeutic strategy in curative and non-curative approaches. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2019; 12:1756284819836205. [PMID: 30915167 PMCID: PMC6429646 DOI: 10.1177/1756284819836205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global health issue with increasing incidence and high mortality rate. Depending on the tumor load and extent of underlying liver cirrhosis, aggressive surgical treatment by hepatectomy or liver transplantation (LT) may lead to cure, whereas different modalities of liver-directed locoregional or systemic tumor treatments are currently available for a noncurative approach. Apart from tumor burden and grade of liver dysfunction, assessment of prognostic relevant biological tumor aggressiveness is vitally important for establishing a promising multimodal therapeutic strategy and improving the individual treatment-related risk/benefit ratio. In recent years, an increasing body of clinical evidence has been presented that 18F-fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), which is a standard nuclear imaging device in oncology, may serve as a powerful surrogate for tumor invasiveness and prognosis in HCC patients and, thereby, impact individual decision making on most appropriate therapy concept. This review describes the currently available data on the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET in patients with early and advanced HCC stages and the resulting implications for treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yoshida M, Ogino H, Iwata H, Hattori Y, Hashimoto S, Nakajima K, Sasaki S, Hara M, Sekido Y, Mizoe JE, Shibamoto Y. Transient increases in serum α fetoprotein and protein induced by vitamin K antagonist II levels following proton therapy does not necessarily indicate progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett 2019; 17:3026-3034. [PMID: 30854081 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.9922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Transient increases in α-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K antagonist II (PIVKA-II), so-called flares, are frequently observed after treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the present study, changes in AFP and PIVKA-II levels after proton therapy (PT), and the relationship between the flare phenomenon and clinical response were investigated. In 82 patients with stage I/II HCC (59 with no recurrence and 23 with out-of-field recurrence within 1 year), serum AFP and PIVKA-II levels were measured at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-PT. AFP and PIVKA-II flares were defined as a >20% increase from the preceding serum level above 20 ng/ml (AFP) or 40 mAU/ml (PIVKA-II), followed by a >20% drop. Among the 59 patients with no recurrence, 3 (5.1%) had an AFP flare, while 23 (39%) had a PIVKA-II flare. The median time to AFP and PIVKA-II flare peaks was 1 and 6 months, respectively. In 4 patients, PIVKA-II flares were observed twice during follow-up. In 1 patient, AFP and PIVKA-II flares were observed simultaneously at 1 month post-PT. The PIVKA-II level pre-PT was significantly higher in the PIVKA-II flare-positive group compared with that in the flare-negative group (P=0.015, odds ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.3-14.0). In the 23 patients with out-of-field recurrence, the median increase rate of PIVKA-II (203%) was higher than that in the PIVKA-II-flare-positive group (111%, P=0.035) and the time to recurrence (median, 9 months) was longer than the time to peak AFP level (1 month) in the AFP-flare-positive group (P=0.033). There was no significant association between flares and clinical response. Increases in AFP and PIVKA-II levels following PT should be assessed with caution to avoid misinterpretation of therapeutic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiko Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan.,Division of Cancer Biology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan.,Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Field of Cancer Pathology and Informatics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8550, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Yukiko Hattori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Shingo Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Koichiro Nakajima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Shigeru Sasaki
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Masaki Hara
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Sekido
- Division of Cancer Biology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan.,Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Field of Cancer Pathology and Informatics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8550, Japan
| | - Jun-Etsu Mizoe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan.,Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka 540-0008, Japan
| | - Yuta Shibamoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Young S, Taylor A, Golzarian J, Flanagan S, D'Souza D, Sanghvi T. Clinical utility of one month imaging following selective internal radiation therapy. Diagn Interv Imaging 2019; 100:39-46. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
18
|
Nörthen A, Asendorf T, Shin HO, Hinrichs JB, Werncke T, Vogel A, Kirstein MM, Wacker FK, Rodt T. Parametric response mapping cut-off values that predict survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after TACE. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:3288-3300. [PMID: 29680967 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1610-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Parametric response mapping (PRM) is a novel image-analysis technique applicable to assess tumor viability and predict intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, to date, the prognostic value of PRM for prediction of overall survival in HCC patients undergoing TACE is unclear. The objective of this explorative, single-center study was to identify cut-off values for voxel-specific PRM parameters that predict the post TACE overall survival in HCC patients. METHODS PRM was applied to biphasic CT data obtained at baseline and following 3 TACE treatments of 20 patients with HCC tumors ≥ 2 cm. The individual portal venous phases were registered to the arterial phases followed by segmentation of the largest lesion, i.e., the region of interest (ROI). Segmented voxels with their respective arterial and portal venous phase density values were displayed as a scatter plot. Voxel-specific PRM parameters were calculated and compared to patients' survival at 1, 2, and 3 years post treatment to identify the maximal predictive parameters. RESULTS The hypervascularized tissue portion of the ROI was found to represent an independent predictor of the post TACE overall survival. For this parameter, cut-off values of 3650, 2057, and 2057 voxels, respectively, were determined to be optimal to predict overall survival at 1, 2, and 3 years after TACE. Using these cut points, patients were correctly classified as having died with a sensitivity of 80, 92, and 86% and as still being alive with a specificity of 60, 75, and 83%, respectively. The prognostic accuracy measured by area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.73 to 0.87. CONCLUSION PRM may have prognostic value to predict post TACE overall survival in HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aventinus Nörthen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Asendorf
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, 37073, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Hoen-Oh Shin
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jan B Hinrichs
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Werncke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martha M Kirstein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank K Wacker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Rodt
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Elsayes KM, Hooker JC, Agrons MM, Kielar AZ, Tang A, Fowler KJ, Chernyak V, Bashir MR, Kono Y, Do RK, Mitchell DG, Kamaya A, Hecht EM, Sirlin CB. 2017 Version of LI-RADS for CT and MR Imaging: An Update. Radiographics 2018; 37:1994-2017. [PMID: 29131761 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017170098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a reporting system created for the standardized interpretation of liver imaging findings in patients who are at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This system was developed with the cooperative and ongoing efforts of an American College of Radiology-supported committee of diagnostic radiologists with expertise in liver imaging and valuable input from hepatobiliary surgeons, hepatologists, hepatopathologists, and interventional radiologists. In this article, the 2017 version of LI-RADS for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is reviewed. Specific topics include the appropriate population for application of LI-RADS; technical recommendations for image optimization, including definitions of dynamic enhancement phases; diagnostic and treatment response categories; definitions of major and ancillary imaging features; criteria for distinguishing definite HCC from a malignancy that might be non-HCC; management options following LI-RADS categorization; and reporting. ©RSNA, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Jonathan C Hooker
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Michelle M Agrons
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Ania Z Kielar
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - An Tang
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Yuko Kono
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Richard K Do
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Donald G Mitchell
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Aya Kamaya
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Elizabeth M Hecht
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ponselvi Induja M, Ezhilarasan D, Ashok Vardhan N. Evolvulus alsinoides methanolic extract triggers apoptosis in HepG2 cells. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF PHYTOMEDICINE 2018; 8:504-512. [PMID: 30456198 PMCID: PMC6235665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the present study was to evaluate the cytotoxic potentials of Evolvulus alsinoides in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS HepG2 cells were treated with methanolic extract of E. alsinoides at 20, 40 and 80 µg/ml for 24 hr and cytotoxic effect was analyzed by MTT assay. The apoptosis rate was investigated by Hoechst 33342 and annexin V/propidium iodide staining. Mitochondrial membrane potential was evaluated by rhodamine staining. Also, the expression of catenin - β 1 protein was analyzed by western blotting. RESULTS E. alsinoides methanolic extract treatment caused significant cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Dual staining assay confirmed the presence of early and late apoptotic cells only in extract-treated groups. Plant extract treatment also caused nuclear fragmentation and chromatin condensation in HepG2 cells. Mitochondrial membrane potential also reduced upon E. alsinoides treatments. This treatment also modulated the catenin - β 1 protein expression. CONCLUSION In this study, we demonstrated the proapoptotic potential E. alsinoides in HepG2 cells; thus, this plant may be beneficial in the treatment of liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murugan Ponselvi Induja
- Department of Pharmacology, Biomedical Research Unit and Laboratory Animal Centre (BRULAC), Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Devaraj Ezhilarasan
- Department of Pharmacology, Biomedical Research Unit and Laboratory Animal Centre (BRULAC), Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India,Corresponding Author: Tel: 044-26801580-87, Fax: +91 44 26800892 ,
| | - Nandigam Ashok Vardhan
- Department of Biochemistry, Biomedical Research Unit and Laboratory Animal Centre (BRULAC), Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Van Cutsem E, Verheul HMW, Flamen P, Rougier P, Beets-Tan R, Glynne-Jones R, Seufferlein T. Imaging in Colorectal Cancer: Progress and Challenges for the Clinicians. Cancers (Basel) 2016; 8:cancers8090081. [PMID: 27589804 PMCID: PMC5040983 DOI: 10.3390/cancers8090081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Revised: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of imaging in colorectal cancer (CRC) has significantly evolved over the last twenty years, establishing important roles in surveillance, diagnosis, staging, treatment selection and follow up. The range of modalities has broadened with the development of novel tracer and contrast agents, and the fusion of technologies such as positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT). Traditionally, the most widely used modality for assessing treatment response in metastasised colon and rectal tumours is CT, combined with use of the RECIST guidelines. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that tumour size does not always adequately correlate with clinical outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a more versatile technique and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI may be used to evaluate biological and functional effects of treatment. Integrated fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT combines metabolic and anatomical imaging to improve sensitivity and specificity of tumour detection, and a number of studies have demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy of this modality in a variety of tumour types, including CRC. These developments have enabled the progression of treatment strategies in rectal cancer and improved the detection of hepatic metastatic disease, yet are not without their limitations. These include technical, economical and logistical challenges, along with a lack of robust evidence for standardisation and formal guidance. In order to successfully apply these novel imaging techniques and utilise their benefit to provide truly personalised cancer care, advances need to be clinically realised in a routine and robust manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Van Cutsem
- Department of Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Division of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Patrik Flamen
- Nuclear Medicine Imaging and Therapy Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Philippe Rougier
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, European Hospital, Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France.
| | - Regina Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, HA6 2RN Middlesex, UK.
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Clinic of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective analysis of correlation between apparent diffusion coefficients and histological grade. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:1539-45. [PMID: 27003574 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0715-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To define correlations between the pathological grades of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) derived using breath-holding diffusion-weighted imaging (BH-DWI). METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 94 patients (105 lesions) with pathologically proved HCC who underwent hepatic DWI on a 3.0-T MR platform. HCCs were divided into five groups: well-differentiated (n = 10), well-to-moderately differentiated (n = 11), moderately differentiated (n = 51), moderately to poorly differentiated (n = 20), and poorly differentiated (n = 13) groups. The ADCs of carcinomas across different histological grades were compared by one-way analysis of variance. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to analyze correlations between the degree of histopathological differentiation and ADC. Results were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction. RESULTS The BH technique yielded ADC values that differed significantly by the extent of differentiation (F = 8.392, p < 0.001). A significant negative correlation was found between the extent of differentiation and ADCs (r = -0.462, p < 0.001). The mean ADC values of poorly differentiated HCCs were significantly lower than the well-, well-to-moderately, moderately, and moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs (p values were <0.001, <0.001, 0.003, and 0.031, respectively). CONCLUSION ADC values obtained with BH-DWI may be of importance to non-invasively predict HCC tumor differentiation, and the extent of histological HCC differentiation was inversely correlated with ADC values.
Collapse
|
23
|
Yang K, Zhang XM, Yang L, Xu H, Peng J. Advanced imaging techniques in the therapeutic response of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:4835-4847. [PMID: 27239110 PMCID: PMC4873876 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic liver disease. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can significantly improve the survival rate of patients with HCC and is the first treatment choice for patients who are not suitable for surgical resections. The evaluation of the response to TACE treatment affects not only the assessment of the therapy efficacy but also the development of the next step in the treatment plan. The use of imaging to examine changes in tumor volume to assess the response of solid tumors to treatment has been controversial. In recent years, the emergence of new imaging technology has made it possible to observe the response of tumors to treatment prior to any morphological changes. In this article, the advances in studies reporting the use of computed tomography perfusion imaging, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), intravoxel incoherent motion, diffusion kurtosis imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging, blood oxygen level-dependent MRI, positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography and PET/MRI to assess the TACE treatment response are reviewed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu K, Min XL, Peng J, Yang K, Yang L, Zhang XM. The Changes of HIF-1α and VEGF Expression After TACE in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Med Res 2016; 8:297-302. [PMID: 26985249 PMCID: PMC4780492 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr2496w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
As a common malignant tumor, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high prevalence and is a serious threat to human health. The surgical resection rate of HCC is low, and the prognosis is poor. Although transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the main treatment for HCC patients who are not candidates for surgical resection, it is not considered a curative procedure. For HCC, poor TACE efficacy or TACE failure may be related to tumor angiogenesis of the residual disease. Among the many regulatory factors in tumor angiogenesis, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) play vital roles in this process. In this paper, we conducted a review of the dynamic change and relevance of HIF-1α and VEGF levels after TACE of HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang Liu
- Department of Pain Management, Xianyang Hospital, Yan’an University, Xianyang, Shanxi 712000, China
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
| | - Xu-Li Min
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
| | - Juan Peng
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
| | - Ke Yang
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hoogenboom TC, Thursz M, Aboagye EO, Sharma R. Functional imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepat Oncol 2016; 3:137-153. [PMID: 30191034 DOI: 10.2217/hep-2015-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays a key role in the clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but conventional imaging techniques have limited sensitivity in visualizing small tumors and assessing response to locoregional treatments and sorafenib. Functional imaging techniques allow visualization of organ and tumor physiology. Assessment of functional characteristics of tissue, such as metabolism, proliferation and stiffness, may overcome some of the limitations of structural imaging. In particular, novel molecular imaging agents offer a potential tool for early diagnosis of HCC, and radiomics may aid in response assessment and generate prognostic models. Further prospective research is warranted to evaluate emerging techniques and their cost-effectiveness in the context of HCC in order to improve detection and response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Ch Hoogenboom
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.,Department of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| | - Mark Thursz
- Department of Hepatology, Imperial College NHS Trust, 10th Floor, Norfolk Place, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Hepatology, Imperial College NHS Trust, 10th Floor, Norfolk Place, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Eric O Aboagye
- Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre at Imperial College, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, GN1, Ground Floor, Commonwealth building, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.,Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre at Imperial College, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, GN1, Ground Floor, Commonwealth building, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Rohini Sharma
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.,Department of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Does the Degree of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Necrosis following Transarterial Chemoembolization Impact Patient Survival? JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2016; 2016:4692139. [PMID: 26949394 PMCID: PMC4754482 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4692139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. The association between transarterial chemoembolization- (TACE-) induced HCC tumor necrosis measured by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and patient survival is poorly defined. We hypothesize that survival will be superior in HCC patients with increased TACE-induced tumor necrosis. Materials and Methods. TACE interventions were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor response was quantified via dichotomized (responders and nonresponders) and the four defined mRECIST categories. Results. Median survival following TACE was significantly greater in responders compared to nonresponders (20.8 months versus 14.9 months, p = 0.011). Survival outcomes also significantly varied among the four mRECIST categories (p = 0.0003): complete, 21.4 months; partial, 20.8; stable, 16.8; and progressive, 7.73. Only progressive disease demonstrated significantly worse survival when compared to complete response. Multivariable analysis showed that progressive disease, increasing total tumor diameter, and non-Child-Pugh class A were independent predictors of post-TACE mortality. Conclusions. Both dichotomized (responders and nonresponders) and the four defined mRECIST responses to TACE in patients with HCC were predictive of survival. The main driver of the survival analysis was poor survival in the progressive disease group. Surprisingly, there was small nonsignificant survival benefit between complete, partial, and stable disease groups. These findings may inform HCC treatment decisions following first TACE.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ludwig JM, Camacho JC, Kokabi N, Xing M, Kim HS. The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in Locoregional Therapy Outcome Prediction and Response Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): The New Era of Functional Imaging Biomarkers. Diagnostics (Basel) 2015; 5:546-63. [PMID: 26854170 PMCID: PMC4728474 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics5040546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Revised: 11/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Reliable response criteria are critical for the evaluation of therapeutic response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Current response assessment is mainly based on: (1) changes in size, which is at times unreliable and lag behind the result of therapy; and (2) contrast enhancement, which can be difficult to quantify in the presence of benign post-procedural changes and in tumors presenting with a heterogeneous pattern of enhancement. Given these challenges, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have been recently investigated, aiding specificity to locoregional therapy response assessment and outcome prediction. Briefly, DWI quantifies diffusion of water occurring naturally at a cellular level (Brownian movement), which is restricted in multiple neoplasms because of high cellularity. Disruption of cellular integrity secondary to therapy results in increased water diffusion across the injured membranes. This review will provide an overview of the current literature on DWI therapy response assessment and outcome prediction in HCC following treatment with locoregional therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes M Ludwig
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
| | - Juan C Camacho
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | - Minzhi Xing
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
| | - Hyun S Kim
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Imaging of HCC-Current State of the Art. Diagnostics (Basel) 2015; 5:513-45. [PMID: 26854169 PMCID: PMC4728473 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics5040513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Revised: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is crucial for optimizing treatment outcome. Ongoing advances are being made in imaging of HCC regarding detection, grading, staging, and also treatment monitoring. This review gives an overview of the current international guidelines for diagnosing HCC and their discrepancies as well as critically summarizes the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) techniques for imaging in HCC. The diagnostic performance of MRI with nonspecific and hepatobililiary contrast agents and the role of functional imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging will be discussed. On the other hand, CT as a fast, cheap and easily accessible imaging modality plays a major role in the clinical routine work-up of HCC. Technical advances in CT, such as dual energy CT and volume perfusion CT, are currently being explored for improving detection, characterization and staging of HCC with promising results. Cone beam CT can provide a three-dimensional analysis of the liver with tumor and vessel characterization comparable to cross-sectional imaging so that this technique is gaining an increasing role in the peri-procedural imaging of HCC treated with interventional techniques.
Collapse
|