Age-Related Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the SwissTAVI Registry

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Requiring Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The SwissTAVI Registry

BACKGROUND

The impact of pacemaker (PM) implantation on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains controversial, especially as TAVR indications expand to low-risk patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the all-cause and cardiovascular mortality of patients undergoing PM implantation after TAVR.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational, nationwide TAVR cohort study, the outcomes of patients undergoing permanent PM implantation were investigated. Patients were enrolled from 19 centers across Switzerland between February 2011 and June 2022.

RESULTS

Among 13,360 patients enrolled (mean age 82 ± 7 years, 47% female, self-expanding valves 48%, median follow-up 889 days [Q1-Q3: 365-1,765 days]), 2,028 (15%) required PM implantation within 30 days post-TAVR. Patients requiring post-TAVR PM implantation were older (82 ± 6 years of age vs 81 ± 7 years of age), were predominantly male (58% vs 50%), and more often had atrial fibrillation (34% vs 29%). At 1-year follow-up, these patients had higher overall mortality (aHR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.05-1.26; P = 0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (aHR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.06-1.46; P = 0.006). These trends persisted at 5- and 10-year follow-up. After multivariable adjustments, significantly higher rates of cardiovascular mortality, LVEF decline ≥10%, and NYHA functional class III or IV at 1-year follow-up were observed (aHR: 1.44,; 95% CI: 1.35-1.54; P < 0.001), along with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates at 5- and 10-year follow-up in patients requiring PM implantation following TAVR compared with those not needing a PM.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large nationwide registry, patients receiving PM implantation within 30 days after TAVR had significantly higher rates of overall and cardiovascular mortality up to 10 years. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250).

Association of Body Mass Index With Procedural Success and Outcomes in Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Obesity is a major public health concern linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies suggest an obesity paradox, showing lower mortality in obese patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study investigates the impact of body mass index (BMI) on procedural and long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. Patients undergoing TAVI at two high-volume centers were analyzed and categorized into four BMI groups: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2). To relax the proportional hazards assumption, restricted cubic splines were constructed. The primary outcome was procedural success and safety, including 30-day all-cause-mortality, stroke, and overall bleeding. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality at one and five years. In total, 6,156 patients were included: 114 (1.8%) were underweight, 2,393 (38.8%) normal weight, 2,380 (38.6%) overweight, and 1,269 (20.6%) obese. No significant differences between BMI groups were found in 30-day mortality, stroke, or bleeding. However, underweight patients had higher mortality compared to normal-weight patients at one year (23.7 vs 13.2%, p = 0.001) and five years (53.2% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.048). Obese patients had similar mortality to normal-weight patients at one year (11.4 vs 13.2%, p = 0.120) and five years (41.0 vs 44.0%, p = 0.200). Obesity showed no outcome advantage over normal weight, while underweight was an independent predictor of higher all-cause mortality after TAVI. These findings challenge the obesity paradox in the context of TAVI.

A multicenter prospective clinical study on transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis or pure aortic regurgitation: 5-year outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the long-term durability of available transcatheter heart valves (THVs). The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the 5-year outcomes of using the J-Valve for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in aortic stenosis (AS) and pure aortic regurgitation (AR).

METHODS

From March 2014 to August 2015, all consecutive patients with severe AS and pure AR treated with the J-Valve THV at 3 centers in China were prospectively enrolled in a clinical study. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were performed according to study protocol. All results were reported according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria.

RESULTS

At 5-year follow-up, the all-cause mortality rate was 15.31% (16/98), with a cardiovascular mortality rate of 7.14% (7/98). The incidence of stroke was 7.14% (7/98), and the permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 8.16% (8/98). Echocardiographic follow-up showed left ventricular ejection fraction significantly improved at 5 years in both patients with AS (58.98 ± 10.45% vs 61.78 ± 9.07%, P for trend <.01) and pure AR (52.86 ± 10.98% vs 61.45 ± 6.90%, P for trend < .01). Structural or hemodynamic valve deterioration occurred in 3 cases (3.06%). In total, 97.59% of patients had significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class over the 5-year follow-up, which is associated with significant improvement in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that TAVI with the J-Valve THV provides excellent 5-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes, suggesting TAVI with a dedicated THV is a good alternative treatment for AS and pure AR in selected high-risk patients.

Comparison of invasive and non-invasive gradients before and after TAVI and their implications on clinical outcomes

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is recommended for treatment of high-risk aortic stenosis patients. While measuring mean transaortic valve gradient (MG) is crucial in evaluating procedural success, echocardiographic measurements often overestimate direct invasive measurements. This study aimed to examine the discordance between echocardiographic and invasive MGs in TAVI patients and assess their prognostic value on long-term outcomes. This prospective registry included consecutive TAVI patients at a tertiary university hospital. Transthoracic or transoesophageal echocardiography was performed pre-TAVI, at discharge, 1 month, 1, and 5 years with invasive MG measurements obtained peri-procedurally. The primary endpoints were 5-year all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events. Among 1353 patients from 2011 to 2023, non-invasive MGs exceeded invasive MGs pre- and post-implantation (43 [36, 52] mmHg vs. 40 [30, 50] mmHg, p < 0.001; 9 [6, 12] mmHg vs. 4 [2, 7] mmHg, p < 0.001) Pre-procedural MGs correlated better than post-procedural MGs (r = 0.70, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.23, p < 0.001), particularly in self-expandable valves and smaller sinus of Valsalva diameter (SOVd) (r = 0.33, p < 0.001; r = 0.46, p < 0.001 vs R = 0.06, p = 0.701). Non-invasive MG remained stable from discharge (9 [6, 12] mmHg) to 5 years (9 [7, 12] mmHg). While structural valve deterioration and patient-prosthesis mismatch showed no impact, extreme invasive MGs (< 3 or > 6 mmHg) predicted worse outcomes (mortality hazard: 1.25 [1.06, 1.88] and 0.85 [0.8, 0.95], respectively), unlike non-invasive measurements. In conclusion, invasive as compared with non-invasive MGs correlated better before than after valve implantation, whereas invasive MGs were always lower than non-invasive MGs. Lower invasive MGs after TAVI appeared to be associated with favourable long-term outcomes.

Early and Late Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Chest Radiation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with prior history of chest or mediastinal radiation are deemed high risk for surgical AVR. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a promising alternative for these patients, however, this patient population was underrepresented in prior TAVR trials.

AIMS

To compare the outcomes of TAVR in patients with versus without a history of prior chest or mediastinal radiation.

METHODS

This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Systematic search of electronic databases was conducted up to September 2023. We compared early and late mortality as well as complications. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I-square statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Seven studies comprising 6358 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Patients undergoing TAVR in the radiation group had a higher risk for heart failure exacerbation (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.18-3.59) and aortic valve reintervention (OR: 5.68; 95% CI: 1.83-17.67) in the early postoperative period compared to the nonradiation group. Analysis revealed similar short-term (in-hospital or 30-day) all-cause-mortality (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 0.89-2.98) between the two groups. Other perioperative complications including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, pacemaker insertion requirement, major bleeding as well as access-related complications were not significantly different between the two groups. TAVR in the radiation group was not associated with increased all-cause mortality compared to the nonradiation group (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.93-2.11) after a mean follow-up of 17.6 months. Other endpoints including MI, stroke, need for pacemaker insertion, heart failure readmission rate, and need for aortic valve reintervention were similar in the mid-term follow-up between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TAVR in patients with a history of prior chest or mediastinal radiation was associated with similar short-term and mid-term mortality compared to patients without radiation. The history of chest or mediastinal radiation was associated with more frequent heart failure hospitalizations and aortic valve reintervention in the postoperative period. No difference was found in mid-term complications. Future studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Age and sex-related outcomes in cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus computed tomography-guided transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the preferred treatment for older patients with severe aortic stenosis with outcomes influenced by age and sex. Computed tomography (CT) is the reference imaging modality for TAVR planning, while cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an emerging alternative for this indication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of age and sex on implantation success in patients undergoing CT- or CMR-guided TAVR.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of the randomized TAVR-CMR trial comparing TAVR planning by CT or CMR (NCT03831087). Patients were categorized according to the median age (82 years) and sex. Implantation success, defined using the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definition (absence of procedural mortality, correct positioning of a single prosthetic valve, and proper prosthetic valve performance), was compared at hospital discharge between age groups and sex for each imaging strategy. All-cause mortality at 6 months was compared between imaging strategies across age groups and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients (median age 82 [IQR 80-85] years, 50% (133/267) female) underwent TAVR at two heart centers in Austria between September 2017 and December 2022. Implantation success did not differ significantly between imaging strategies across age and sex subgroups. For patients ≤82 years, success rates were 92.1% (58/63) (CT) vs. 94.7% (72/76) (CMR) (p=0.524), and for those >82 years, 89.4% (59/66) (CT) vs. 91.9% (57/62) (CMR) (p=0.622). Among female patients, success rates were 84.7% (50/59) (CT) vs. 93.2% (69/74) (CMR) (p=0.113), and among male patients, 95.7% (67/70) (CT) vs. 93.8% (60/64) (CMR) (p=0.610). All-cause mortality at 6 months did not differ significantly between imaging strategies across age and sex subgroups. Mortality rates for patients ≤82 and >82 years were 4.8% (3/63) vs. 5.3% (4/76) (p=0.839) and 9.1% (6/66) vs. 12.9% (8/62) (p=0.490) for CT and CMR, respectively. Similarly, female and male patients had comparable mortality rates (10.2% (6/59) vs. 8.1% (6/74), p=0.680; 4.3% (3/70) vs. 9.4% (6/64), p=0.240).

CONCLUSION

In this secondary analysis of the TAVR-CMR trial, CMR-guided TAVR was associated with similar outcomes compared with CT-guided TAVR irrespective of age and sex.

The impact of myocardial injury on outcomes in TAVI patients

BACKGROUND

Peri-procedural myocardial injury (PPMI) has been commonly reported after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and may have a potential impact on outcomes. The recent update to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria for PPMI warrants a comparison with the preceding VARC-2 criteria to understand its implications on patient outcomes.

AIMS

To assess the prognostic significance of PPMI as defined by VARC-3 versus VARC-2 in TAVI patients and evaluate the predictive value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) for adverse outcomes within 1 year post-TAVI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in a tertiary university hospital between December 2011 and June 2023, with hs-cTnT concentrations pre- and post-procedurally, were enrolled. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were major cardiac adverse events (MACE), defined as a composite end point including all-cause mortality, unplanned reintervention, stroke, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding at 30 days and 1 year.

RESULTS

Of 653 patients, 535 (82%) had elevated baseline serum hs-cTnT. It was a significant predictor of 1-year mortality and MACE, whereas post-TAVI hs-cTnT concentrations did not predict outcomes (HR: 1.5, p = 0.21 and HR: 0.943, p = 0.54). 367 (56%) of all patients met VARC-2 PPMI criteria, while only 24 (3.7%) met VARC-3 criteria. Patients meeting VARC-3 criteria had significantly more comorbidities and higher 1-year mortality (25% vs. 9%; p = 0.0047). VARC-2 criteria did not predict higher mortality (9% vs. 9%; p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline hs-cTnT concentrations strongly predicted 1-year mortality and MACE, while post-procedure levels did not. VARC-3 criteria provided better prognostic discrimination than VARC-2.

Effectiveness and safety of exercise training and rehabilitation in elderly patients after heart valve intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of exercise rehabilitation in older adults undergoing intervention for heart valve disease.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang were systematically searched until January 2024. Risk-of-bias assessments were performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis of the following indexes was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Nine trials involving 631 patients were ultimately included. Exercise rehabilitation significantly reduced the risk of adverse events, increased the 6-minute walk distance, improved the physical component of quality of life, and shortened the length of postoperative hospitalization. However, exercise rehabilitation did not affect all-cause mortality, left heart ejection fraction, or peak oxygen uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise rehabilitation may enhance exercise capacity, reduce the incidence of adverse events, and shorten the length of postoperative hospitalization in older adults undergoing intervention for heart valve disease.

ECG, clinical and novel CT-imaging predictors of necessary pacemaker implantation after transfemoral aortic valve replacement

PURPOSE

Newly onset conduction disturbances with the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain the most common complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The objective was to evaluate the predictive value of clinical, ECG and new pre-procedural CT-imaging parameters for the requirement of PPM-implantation after TAVR.

METHODS

2105 consecutive patients receiving TAVR using a balloon expandable prosthesis (Sapien 3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irving, CA, USA) at our institution were enrolled. Patients receiving a valve-in-valve prosthesis, TAVR after surgical repair, with missing or non-diagnostic CT-scans, with pre-implanted PPM and after TAVR in mitral position were excluded. The most suitable classification model for the given dataset was first identified through benchmark testing and later applied for prediction analysis.

RESULTS

312 eligible patients requiring PPM implantation were compared to an age- matched control group of 305 patients not requiring PPM implantation. A scaled LASSO model allowed for most accurate prediction with an AUC of 0.70. Right bundle branch block was the strongest predictor (OR 2.739), followed by atrioventricular block 1° (OR 2.091), prosthesis diameter (OR 1.351), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.255), arterial hypertension (OR 1.215), coronary artery disease (1.070), the angle of ventricle axis and aortic root (OR 1.030), sinotubular junction height (OR 1.014) and the calcification of the left coronary cuspid (OR 1.007).

CONCLUSIONS

ECG- and clinical outperform imaging parameters in predicting PPM-implantation following TAVR. Right bundle branch block emerged as the most significant predictor overall, while the angle of ventricle axis and aortic root as a novel imaging-based predictor.

Early safety after TAVR according to VARC-3 criteria: incidence, predictors, and clinical impact

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition of the early safety (ES) composite endpoint after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) lacks clinical validation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of ES after TAVR as defined by VARC-3 criteria.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter study including 10 078 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transarterial TAVR. According to VARC-3 criteria, ES at 30 days was defined as freedom from all-cause mortality, stroke, VARC type 2-4 bleeding, major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complications, acute kidney injury stages 3-4, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, new permanent pacemaker implantation, and surgery or intervention related to the device. Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were prospectively collected in a dedicated database.

RESULTS

ES was achieved in 6598 patients (65.5%). The main factors associated with a lack of ES were the occurrence of type 2-4 bleeding (18.9%), and new pacemaker implantation (13.6%). Advanced age, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and balloon postdilation were associated with an increased risk of no-ES (P<.01 for all). Failure to achieve ES was associated with higher all-cause mortality up to 1-year after TAVR (HR, 3.17; 95%CI, 2.76-3.65; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

VARC-3 ES was not achieved in up to one-third of contemporary TAVR patients, which was associated with worse mid-term outcomes. The factors associated with increased risk were advanced age, baseline comorbidities, and some procedural features (postdilation). These findings highlight the importance of continued efforts to minimize the risk of TAVR-related procedural complications.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) prostheses in vitro - biofilm formation and antibiotic effects

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a percutaneous catheter-based treatment of aortic stenosis as an alternative to open heart valve surgery. In cases of TAVI endocarditis, the treatment possibilities may be limited as surgical removal of the infected valve may be associated with a high risk in elderly, comorbid or frail patients. The propensity of bacteria to form a biofilm on foreign material is assumed to be of importance part of the disease process in TAVI endocarditis, but no studies on biofilm formation on TAVI valves have been conducted. We hypothesize that Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on TAVI valves may have an impact on antibiotic tolerance and non-surgical cure rates.

Methods

TAVI valves (pieces including part of the metal frame, approximately 1 cm wide) were exposed to either species in vitro in LB-Krebs Ringer medium at 37 °C, with the bacterial count being assessed by culturing of sonicated TAVI pieces and broth at 0, 4, 18 and 24 h after bacterial exposure. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. Effects of ampicillin, gentamicin, moxifloxacin, rifampicin (for S. aureus), and ceftriaxone (for E. faecalis) at 5 times minimal inhibitory concentration were tested alone and in combination with ampicillin. Antibiotics were added to biofilm aged 0 or 24 h and the effects assessed.

Results

Exposure for 15 min established attachment to all of valve pieces. SEM findings were consistent with biofilm formation and suggested lower amounts of bacteria on the metal compared to the tissue part of the TAVI valves. The number of bacteria attached to the TAVI valves increased until 24 h of incubation from less than 10^1 to a level of approximately 10^9 CFU/g. The bacteria became more tolerant to antibiotics on the TAVI valves over time, with the bactericidal effect against 24-h old biofilm being significantly less effective than against 0-h old biofilm depending on antibiotic.

Conclusions

The results indicate that bacteria can adhere to metal and tissue parts of the TAVI valves within minutes after an exposure which is comparable to transient bacteremia in vivo, and that the bacteria rapidly gain biofilm properties, associated with significantly reduced antibiotic effect.

Incidence, Predictors, and Prognostic Impact of Neurologic Events After TAVR According to VARC-3 Criteria

BACKGROUND

The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition for neurologic events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) lacks clinical validation.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of neurologic events following TAVR as defined by VARC-3 criteria.

METHODS

This was a multicenter study including 2,924 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. Based on Neurologic Academic Research Consortium (NeuroARC) classification, neurologic events were classified as NeuroARC type 1 (stroke), NeuroARC type 2 (covert central nervous system injury), and NeuroARC type 3 (transient ischemic attack and delirium). Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were prospectively collected in a dedicated database.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 13 (7-37) months, neurologic events occurred in 471 patients (16.1%), NeuroARC type 1, 2, and 3 in 37.4%, 4.7%, and 58.0% of cases, respectively, and the majority (58.6%) were periprocedural. Advanced age, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, major vascular complications, and in-hospital bleeding determined an increased risk of periprocedural events (P < 0.03 for all). Neurologic events occurring during the periprocedural time frame were independently associated with a substantial increase in mortality at 1 year after the intervention (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.23-2.97; P = 0.004). However, although NeuroARC type 1 was associated with an increased mortality risk (IRR: 3.38; 95% CI: 2.30-5.56; P < 0.001 and IRR: 21.7; 95% CI: 9.63-49.1; P < 0.001 for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively), the occurrence of NeuroARC type 3 events had no impact on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic events after TAVR were associated with poorer short- and long-term survival. This correlation was related to the type of NeuroARC event defined by the VARC-3 criteria. Given the negative impact on clinical outcomes, every attempt should be made to reduce the risk of neurologic complications after TAVR.

Prognostic Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an efficient and safe alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While severe aortic stenosis as well as severe aortic regurgitation (AR) are known to negatively impact left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), prior studies have shown that TAVR can lead to an improvement in LVEF. Thus far, little is known about the prognostic implication of LVEF improvement as a sole predictor of outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of LVEF impairment before TAVR, as well as early LVEF improvement in patients undergoing TAVR. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR in a large tertiary university hospital were consecutively included in a prospective registry. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at baseline, after 1 month and annually thereafter. Significant LVEF improvement was defined as a relative increase of ≥10% in LVEF at 30 days compared to baseline LVEF. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding and unplanned re-interventions of the aortic valve at 5 years. Results: Among 1655 patients who underwent TAVR between September 2011 and April 2024, the LVEF at baseline was available for 1556 patients. Of these, 1031 patients (66.2%) had preserved LVEF at baseline (LVEF ≥ 53%), whereas 303 patients (19.5%) had moderately reduced LVEF (40-52%) and 222 patients (14.3%) had severely reduced LVEF (<40%). Out of the patients with impaired LVEF, 155 (40.4%) patients showed a significant improvement in LVEF ≥10% after 30 days, while 229 (60.6%) patients showed no significant LVEF improvement (<10%). Patients with preserved LVEF at baseline had significantly better mortality outcomes than those with severely reduced LVEF (p < 0.001). LVEF improvement was associated with a survival benefit after 1 year (p = 0.009, HR 2.68, 0.95 CI 1.23-5.85) which diminished after 5 years (p = 0.058), but patients with LVEF improvement showed lower MACE rates at 5 years (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Preserved LVEF before TAVR is an independent predictor for improved outcomes. Additionally, early improvement in LVEF is associated with beneficial outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.

Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Nonhome Discharge Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Multicenter Australian Experience-The NHD TAVI Study

Patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) commonly experience nonhome discharge (NHD), a phenomenon associated with increased health care expenditure and possibly poorer outcomes. Despite its clinical relevance in TAVI, the incidence and predictors of NHD and its impact on the quality of life remain poorly characterized. Also unknown is the proportion of patients who undergo TAVI that require long-term residential care after initial NHD. Therefore, we aimed to address these questions using a large, multicenter Australian cohort. A total of 2,229 patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 to 2023 included in the Alfred-Cabrini-Epworth TAVI Registry were analyzed. The median age was 82 (interquartile range 78 to 86) years and 41% were women. A total of 257 patients (12%) were not discharged home after TAVI, with the incidence falling over time (R2 = 0.636, p <0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model for NHD prediction was developed with excellent calibration and discrimination (C-statistic = 0.835). The independent predictors of NHD were postprocedural stroke (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 11.05), procedure at a private hospital (aOR 3.01), living alone (aOR 2.35), vascular access site complications (aOR 2.09), frailty (aOR 1.89), age >80 years (aOR 1.82), hypoalbuminemia (aOR 1.76), New York Heart Association III to IV (aOR 1.74), and hospital length of stay (aOR 1.13) (all p <0.05). NHD was not associated with mortality at 30 days and <1% of all patients required longer-term residential care. In conclusion, although common after TAVI, NHD does not predict short-term mortality, most patients successfully return home within 30 days, and when used appropriately, NHD may serve as a brief and effective method of optimizing functional status without compromising long-term independence.

Chronological vs Biological Age in Interventional Cardiology: A Comprehensive Approach to Care for Older Adults: JACC Family Series

Aging is the gradual decline in physical and physiological functioning leading to increased susceptibility to stressors and chronic illnesses, including cardiovascular disease. With an aging global population, in which 1 in 6 individuals will be older than 60 years by 2030, interventional cardiologists are increasingly involved in providing complex care for older individuals. Although procedural aspects remain their main clinical focus, interventionalists frequently encounter age-associated risks that influence eligibility for invasive care, decision making during the intervention, procedural adverse events, and long-term management decisions. The unprecedented growth in transcatheter interventions, especially for structural heart diseases at extremes of age, have pushed age-related risks and implications for cardiovascular care to the forefront. In this JACC state-of-the-art review, the authors provide a comprehensive overview of the aging process as it relates to cardiovascular interventions, with special emphasis on the difference between chronological and biological aging. The authors also address key considerations to improve health outcomes for older patients during and after their invasive cardiovascular care. The role of "gerotherapeutics" in interventional cardiology, technological innovation in measuring biological aging, and the integration of patient-centered outcomes in the older adult population are also discussed.

Trends in transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice and clinical outcomes at an Irish tertiary referral centre

OBJECTIVE

A paucity of data exists on how transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) practice has evolved in Ireland. This study sought to analyse temporal trends in patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes at an Irish tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

The prospective Mater TAVI database was divided into time tertiles based on when TAVI was performed: Group A, November 2008-April 2013; Group B, April 2013-September 2017; and Group C, September 2017-February 2022. Patient and procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared across groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1063 (Group A, 59; Group B, 268; and Group C:, 736) patients were treated with TAVI during the study period (mean age 81.1±7.4, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 5.9±5.1).Conscious sedation (Group A, 0%; Group B, 59.9%; and Group C, 90.2%, p<0.001) and femoral artery access (Group A, 76.3%; Group B, 90.7%; and Group C, 96.6%, p<0.001) were used more frequently over time. The median length of hospital stay reduced from 9 days (IQR 7, 18) in Group A to 2 days (IQR 2, 3) in Group C. In-hospital death was numerically higher in Group A compared with Group C (6.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.078). At 1-year follow-up, the rate of death and/or stroke was similar in Group A and Group C (20.3% vs 12.0%, adjusted HR 1.49, 95% CI (0.59 to 3.74)).

CONCLUSION

There was exponential growth in TAVI procedural volume during the study period. A minimalist approach to TAVI emerged, and this was associated with significantly shorter procedure duration and hospital stay. Clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up did not change significantly over time.

On the Material Constitutive Behavior of the Aortic Root in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. However, there is limited knowledge on the material properties of the aortic root in TAVI patients, and this can impact the credibility of computer simulations. This study aimed to develop a non-invasive inverse approach for estimating reliable material constituents for the aortic root and calcified valve leaflets in patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

The identification of material parameters is based on the simultaneous minimization of two cost functions, which define the difference between model predictions and cardiac-gated CT measurements of the aortic wall and valve orifice area. Validation of the inverse analysis output was performed comparing the numerical predictions with actual CT shapes and post-TAVI measures of implanted device diameter.

RESULTS

A good agreement of the peak systolic shape of the aortic wall was found between simulations and imaging, with similarity index in the range in the range of 83.7% to 91.5% for n.20 patients. Not any statistical difference was observed between predictions and CT measures of orifice area for the stenotic aortic valve. After TAVI simulations, the measurements of SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3) device diameter were in agreement with those from post-TAVI angio-CT imaging. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated a modest impact on the S3 diameters when altering the elastic material property of the aortic wall in the range of inverse analysis solution.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility and potential benefits of using non-invasive imaging techniques and computational modeling to estimate material properties in patients undergoing TAVI.

Comparison of Mid-Term Prognosis in Intermediate-to-Low-Risk Contemporary Population with Guidelines-Oriented Age Cutoff

BACKGROUND

Current European guidelines support transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in intermediate-to-low-risk patients ≥75 years-old, but its prognostic relevance is unknown.

METHODS

Intermediate-to-low-risk (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons score <8%) patients enrolled in the HORSE registry were included. We compared the populations aged under 75 with those over 75. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2685 patients were included: 280 (8.6%) < 75 and 2405 ≥ 75 years. Through a mean follow-up of 437 ± 381 days, 198 (8.2%) and 23 (8.2%) patients died in the two arms without statistically significant differences (log-rank p = 0.925). At Cox regression analysis, age did not predict the occurrence of all-cause death, neither as a continuous variable (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.04, p = 0.294) nor dichotomizing according to the prespecified cutoff of 75 years (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.63-1.51, p = 0.924). Time-to-event ROC curves showed low accuracy of age to predict all-cause mortality (area under the curve of 0.54 for both 1-year and 2-year outcomes).

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI has comparable benefits across age strata for intermediate-to-low-risk patients. The age cutoff suggested by the current guidelines is not predictive of the risk of adverse events during hospital stays or of all-cause mortality through a mid-term follow-up.

Early safety and mid-term clinical outcomes of technology transfer of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis in Vietnam: a single-center experience of 90 patients

Background

This study investigated the early safety and mid-term outcomes of stepwise implementation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in Vietnamese patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at a single center, following the process of technical transfer.

Methods

From 2017 to 2022, 90 patients with symptomatic severe AS underwent TAVI at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam. The first 30 cases received support for technology transfer from international proctors. One-year outcomes were evaluated using the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria.

Findings

Forty patients (45.5%) had bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). The Medtronic Evolut R/Pro self-expanding valve system was used in 98.9% of all cases, with a 29-mm valve being the most common. Device success was achieved in 95.6% of cases, whereas one procedural death occurred. At one year, four deaths (5.3%) occurred and all were in the BAV group. Other complications included stroke (2.8%), hospital readmission due to the valve or worsening heart failure (2.8%), permanent pacemaker implantation (9.9%), and moderate paravalvular leak (3.0%). The left ventricular ejection fraction and mean transvalvular gradient significantly improved after TAVI. There were no significant differences in procedural success and mortality when the proctor support period and the subsequent solo operator period were compared.

Interpretation

TAVI procedure is safe for treating severe AS in Vietnamese patients, despite the high prevalence of BAV. The procedural complication rate was low, with promising outcomes at one year. These results also highlight the effectiveness of the TAVI technical transfer model in Vietnam.

Funding

No funding was provided for this study.

Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on pre- and post-operative transcatheter aortic valve replacement prognoses

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a relatively new treatment method for aortic stenosis (AS) and has been demonstrated to be suitable for patients with varying risk levels. Indeed, among high-risk patients, TAVR outcomes are comparable to, or even better, than that of the traditional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) method. TAVR outcomes, with respect to post-surgical functional capacity and quality of life, have also been found to be improved, especially when combined with cardiac rehabilitation (CR). CR is a multidisciplinary system, which integrates cardiology with other medical disciplines, such as sports, nutritional, mind-body, and behavioral medicine. It entails the development of appropriate medication, exercise, and diet prescriptions, along with providing psychological support, ensuring the cessation of smoking, and developing risk factor management strategies for cardiovascular disease patients. However, even with CR being able to improve TAVR outcomes and reduce post-surgical mortality rates, it still has largely been underutilized in clinical settings. This article reviews the usage of CR during both pre-and postoperative periods for valvular diseases, and the factors involved in influencing subsequent patient prognoses, thereby providing a direction for subsequent research and clinical applications.

Predictors of All-Cause Mortality After Successful Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Prevalent and incident atrial fibrillation are common in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation and are associated with impaired postprocedural outcomes, including mortality. We determined predictors of long-term mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The EdoxabaN Versus standard of care and theIr effectS on clinical outcomes in pAtients havinG undergonE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Atrial Fibrillation (ENVISAGE-TAVI AF) trial (NCT02943785) was a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with prevalent or incident atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation who received edoxaban or vitamin K antagonists. A Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify predictors of all-cause mortality using a stepwise approach for multiple regression analysis. In addition, we assessed the performance of different risk scores and prediction models using ENVISAGE-TAVI AF data. Of 1,426 patients in ENVISAGE-TAVI AF, 178 (12.5%) died during the follow-up period (median 548 days). Our stepwise approach identified greater risk of mortality with older age, impaired renal function, nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, excessive alcohol use, New York Heart Association heart failure class III/IV, peripheral artery disease, and history of major bleeding or predisposition to bleeding. The present model (concordance statistic [c-statistic] 0.67) was a better discriminator than were other frequently used risk scores, such as the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (c-statistic 0.56); Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75, Diabetes, Stroke, Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, and Sex category (CHA2DS2-VASc) score (c-statistic 0.54); or Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio, Elderly, and Drugs/alcohol concomitantly (HAS-BLED) score (c-statistic 0.58). In ENVISAGE-TAVI AF, several modifiable and nonmodifiable clinical characteristics were significantly associated with greater long-term all-cause mortality. Improved risk stratification to estimate the probability of mortality after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation may improve long-term patient prognosis.

Effects of SARS-COV-2 infection on outcomes in patients hospitalized for acute cardiac conditions. A prospective, multicenter cohort study (Swiss Cardiovascular SARS-CoV-2 Consortium)

Background

Although the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) primarily affects the respiratory system, the disease entity has been associated with cardiovascular complications. This study sought to assess the effect of concomitant SARS-COV-2 infection on clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized primarily for acute cardiac conditions on cardiology wards in Switzerland.

Methods

In this prospective, observational study conducted in 5 Swiss cardiology centers during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients hospitalized due to acute cardiac conditions underwent a reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test at the time of admission and were categorized as SARS-COV-2 positive (cases) or negative (controls). Patients hospitalized on cardiology wards underwent treatment for the principal acute cardiac condition according to local practice. Clinical outcomes were recorded in-hospital, at 30 days, and after 1 year and compared between cases and controls. To adjust for imbalanced baseline characteristics, a subgroup of patients derived by propensity matching was analyzed.

Results

Between March 2020 and February 2022, 538 patients were enrolled including 122 cases and 416 controls. Mean age was 68.0 ± 14.7 years, and 75% were men. Compared with controls, SARS-COV-2-positive patients more commonly presented with acute heart failure (35% vs. 17%) or major arrhythmia (31% vs. 9%), but less commonly with acute coronary syndrome (26% vs. 53%) or severe aortic stenosis (4% vs. 18%). Mortality was significantly higher in cases vs. controls in-hospital (16% vs. 1%), at 30 days (19.0% vs. 2.2%), and at 1 year (28.7% vs. 7.6%: p < 0.001 for all); this was driven primarily (up to 30 days) and exclusively (at one-year follow-up) by higher non-cardiovascular mortality, and was accompanied by a greater incidence of worsening renal function in cases vs. controls. These findings were maintained in a propensity-matched subgroup of 186 patients (93 cases and 93 controls) with balanced clinical presentation and baseline characteristics.

Conclusions

In this observational study of patients hospitalized for acute cardiac conditions, SARS-COV-2 infection at index hospitalization was associated with markedly higher all-cause and non-cardiovascular mortality throughout one-year follow-up. These findings highlight the need for effective, multifaceted management of both cardiac and non-cardiac morbidities and prolonged surveillance in patients with acute cardiac conditions complicated by SARS-COV-2 infection.

Incidence and Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Failed Bioprosthetic Valves

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a widely used, comparably efficient and safe alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Its utilization continues to grow, especially among younger patients. Despite improvements in durability, degeneration and subsequent re-interventions of failed prosthetic valves are still common. Even though valve-in-valve procedures have become more frequent, little is known about the trends over time or about clinical and echocardiographic long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent a valve-in-valve procedure between December 2011 and December 2022 in a large tertiary university hospital were analyzed. Primary outcomes were defined as procedural and device successes as well as event-free survival. Secondary analyses between subsets of patients divided by index valve and date of procedure were performed.

RESULTS

Among 1407 procedures, 58 (4%) were valve-in-valve interventions, with an increased frequency observed over time. Overall, technical success was achieved in 88% and device success in 85% of patients. Complications were predominantly minor, with similar success rates among TAVR-in-SAVR (TiSAVR) and TAVR-in-TAVR (TiTAVR). Notably, there were significant and lasting improvements in mean echocardiographic gradients at 1 year. Event-free survival was 76% at one month and 69% at one year.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last decade, a rising trend of valve-in-valve procedures was observed. Despite an increase in procedures, complications show a contrasting decline with improved technical and device success over time. TiSAVR and TiTAVR showed comparable rates of procedural and device success as well as similar outcomes, highlighting the utility of valve-in-valve procedures in an aging population.

Loss of Independent Living in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The recommendation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients 65 to 80 years of age is equivocal, leaving patients with a difficult decision. We evaluated whether TAVR compared to SAVR is associated with reduced odds for loss of independent living in patients ≤65, 66 to 79, and ≥80 years of age. Further, we explored mechanisms of the association of TAVR and adverse discharge.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR within a large academic medical system who lived independently before the procedure were included. A multivariable logistic regression model, adjusting for a priori defined confounders including patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and a risk score for adverse discharge after cardiac surgery, was used to assess the primary association. We tested the interaction of patient age with the association between aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedure and loss of independent living. We further assessed whether the primary association was mediated (ie, percentage of the association that can be attributed to the mediator) by the procedural duration as prespecified mediator.

RESULTS

A total of 1751 patients (age median [quartiles; min-max], 76 [67, 84; 23-100]; sex, 56% female) were included. A total of 27% (222/812) of these patients undergoing SAVR and 20% (188/939) undergoing TAVR lost the ability to live independently. In our cohort, TAVR was associated with reduced odds for loss of independent living compared to SAVR (adjusted odds ratio [OR adj ] 0.19 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.14-0.26]; P < .001). This association was attenuated in patients ≤65 years of age (OR adj 0.63 [0.26-1.56]; P = .32) and between 66 and 79 years of age (OR adj 0.23 [0.15-0.35]; P < .001), and magnified in patients ≥80 years of age (OR adj 0.16 [0.10-0.25]; P < .001; P -for-interaction = .004). Among those >65 years of age, a shorter procedural duration mediated 50% (95% CI, 28-76; P < .001) of the beneficial association of TAVR and independent living.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients >65 years of age undergoing TAVR compared to SAVR had reduced odds for loss of independent living. This association was partly mediated by shorter procedural duration. No association between AVR approach and the primary end point was found in patients ≤65 years of age.

Patterns of Aortic Valve Replacement in Europe: Adoption by Age

INTRODUCTION

The management of patients with severe aortic stenosis may differ according to patients' age. The aim of this analysis was to describe patterns of aortic valve replacement (AVR) use in European countries stratified by age.

METHODS

Procedure volume data for AVR, including surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), for the years 2015-2020 were obtained from national databases for twelve European countries (Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland). Procedure volumes were reported by patient age (<50 years, 5-year age groups between 50 and 85 years, and ≥85 years). Patients per million (PPM) population undergoing AVR each year were calculated using population estimates from Eurostat.

RESULTS

AVR PPM varied widely between countries, from 508 PPM in Germany to 174 PPM in Poland in 2020. TAVI rates ranged from 61% in Switzerland and Finland to 25% in Poland. AVR PPM increased with age to a peak at 80-84 years, after which it decreased again. AVR procedures increased from 2015 to 2019 at an average annual rate of 3.9%. AVR increased more substantially in people aged ≥80 years than in younger age groups; these older age groups accounted for 30% of all AVR procedures in 2015 and 35% in 2019. TAVI accounted for an increasing proportion of all AVR procedures as patient age increased; an overall average of 96% of males and 98% of females aged ≥85 years received TAVI as the treatment modality, although adoption of TAVI differed between countries.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variation in the rates of AVR use and the adoption of TAVI versus sAVR between European countries. The use of TAVI has increased in recent years, particularly for older patients.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Nonagenarians and Octogenarians (Analysis from the National Inpatient Sample Database)

Risks among nonagenarian (age ≥90 years) and octogenarian (age 80 to 89 years) patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared with clinically similar septuagenarian (age 70 to 79 years) patients remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of TAVI in nonagenarians and octogenarians compared with septuagenarians. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients aged ≥70 years hospitalized for TAVI from 2016 to 2020 and to compare outcomes in nonagenarians and octogenarians versus septuagenarians. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, length of stay (LOS), and total costs. The trends in in-hospital outcomes were evaluated. Results were adjusted for demographic/clinical factors. The total cohort included 263,325 patients hospitalized for TAVI, of whom 11.9% were nonagenarians, 51.1% octogenarians, and 37.0% septuagenarians. After adjustment, nonagenarians and octogenarians had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 2.41 for nonagenarians; adjusted odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.01 for octogenarians), heart block, permanent pacemaker insertion, stroke, major bleeding, blood transfusion, and palliative care consultation than septuagenarians (all p <0.01). LOS was longer and the total costs were higher for nonagenarians and octogenarians (both p <0.01). Over the study period, in-hospital mortality decreased in nonagenarians (ptrend = 0.04), and major bleeding, permanent pacemaker insertion, LOS, and costs decreased in all patients aged ≥70 years (ptrend <0.01). In conclusion, nonagenarians and octogenarians who underwent TAVI have higher rates of mortality and procedure-related complications than clinically similar septuagenarians. Further research is necessary to optimize outcomes in this frail population.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Addressing the Subsequent Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is now a commonly used therapy in patients with severe aortic stenosis, even in those patients at low surgical risk. The indications for TAVI have broadened as the therapy has proven to be safe and effective. Most challenges associated with TAVI after its initial introduction have been impressively reduced; however, the possible need for post-TAVI permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) secondary to conduction disturbances continues to be on the radar. Conduction abnormalities post-TAVI are always of concern given that the aortic valve lies in close proximity to critical components of the cardiac conduction system. This review will present a summary of noteworthy pre-and post-procedural conduction blocks, the best use of telemetry and ambulatory device monitoring to avoid unnecessary PPI or to recognize the need for late PPI due to delayed high-grade conduction blocks, predictors to identify those patients at greatest risk of requiring PPI, important CT measurements and considerations to optimize TAVI planning, and the utility of the MInimizing Depth According to the membranous Septum (MIDAS) technique and the cusp-overlap technique. It is stressed that careful membranous septal (MS) length measurement by MDCT during pre-TAVI planning is necessary to establish the optimal implantation depth before the procedure to reduce the risk of compression of the MS and consequent damage to the cardiac conduction system.

Pre-procedural oral anticoagulant use is associated with cardiovascular events in women after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An analysis from the WIN-TAVI cohort

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an accepted treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Predicting which patients are at risk for adverse clinical outcomes after TAVI remains difficult, especially in women.

AIM

To identify predictors of adverse events in the WIN-TAVI cohort.

METHODS

The WIN-TAVI study is an observational registry of 1019 women undergoing TAVI for severe symptomatic AS. Follow-up was 1 year. The primary outcome was defined according to VARC-2: a composite of mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or heart failure. The secondary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or heart failure.

RESULTS

We included 1019 women with severe AS (mean age of 82.5 ± 6.3 years). At 1 year, 16.4% of the patients experienced the primary endpoint and 12.6% the secondary endpoint. The use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) was the strongest independent predictor of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.079-2.106, p = 0.016). Independent predictors of the secondary endpoint were age (aHR 1.04 per year, 95% CI 1.01-1.074, p = 0.016) and use of OAC (aHR: 1.79, 95% CI 1.24-2.60, p = 0.002). OAC use was not associated with higher bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

Pre-procedural use of OAC was the strongest predictor of adverse outcomes during 1-year follow-up, likely reflecting a combination of high-risk factors and comorbidities, but was not related to increased bleeding risk.

[Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Multivalvular Heart Disease]

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Multivalvular Heart Disease Abstract. The prevalence of multivaluvular heart disease is high in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The most common combination is aortic valve stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation, followed by the combination of AS with a tricuspid regurgitation or mitral stenosis. Grading of multivalvular disease is challenging and can quickly lead to underestimation of the disease stage. Therefore, a profound knowledge of pathophysiologic interactions is essential, and the patient should always undergo multimodal evaluation. After a successful TAVI intervention, secondary heart valve defects may improve, deteriorate, or remain unchanged. Due to the still sparse scientific data in this field, the role of the heart team remains central to provide the patient with an individually adapted therapy plan.

Nursing Home Admission Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Loss of autonomy associated with nursing home admission (NHA) is a concern for patients. Yet the incidence of NHA after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and factors associated with NHA following TAVR compared with the general population.

METHODS

Through Danish registries, patients alive at discharge after TAVR were identified from January 2014 to October 2021. Patients were matched 1:5 on sex, age, and calendar year to the general population. The 3-year cumulative incidence and 95% CI of NHA were estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, accounting for the competing risk for death. Through multivariate cause-specific Cox regression models, factors associated with NHA were examined.

RESULTS

In total, 5,312 TAVR patients were matched to 26,560 control subjects with a median age of 81 years and 56.1% males. Comorbidity burden was higher for TAVR patients. The 3-year cumulative incidence of NHA was 6.3% (95% CI: 5.5%-7.1%) for TAVR patients compared with 5.8% (95% CI: 5.4%-6.1%) for the general population. For TAVR patients >85 years of age, the cumulative incidence of NHA was 11.6% (95% CI: 9.5%-13.8%), and the risk for death was 23.3% (95% CI: 20.4%-26.2%). Factors associated with NHA were increasing age, frailty, living alone, and atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVR was not associated with an increased incidence of NHA compared with the general population. Despite the increased incidence of NHA for TAVR patients >85 years of age, approximately 2 in 3 patients were still alive and not admitted to nursing homes 3 years after TAVR.

Prosthesis Tailoring for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has risen over the past 20 years as a safe and effective alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis, and is now a well-established and recommended treatment option in suitable patients irrespective of predicted risk of mortality after surgery. Studies of numerous devices, either newly developed or reiterations of previous prostheses, have been accruing. We hereby review TAVI devices, with a focus on commercially available options, and aim to present a guide for prosthesis tailoring according to patient-related anatomical and clinical factors that may favor particular designs.

Sex Differences in the Impact of Aortic Valve Calcium Score on Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an approved alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. As the clinical adoption of TAVR expands, it remains important to identify predictors of mortality after TAVR. We aimed to evaluate the impact of sex differences in aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) on long-term mortality following TAVR in a large patient sample.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients who successfully underwent TAVR for treatment of severe native aortic valve stenosis from June 2010 to May 2021 across all US Mayo Clinic sites with follow-up through July 2021. AVCS values were obtained from preoperative computed tomography of the chest. Additional clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-proportional hazard regression models were employed to evaluate the effect of AVCS on long-term mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2543 patients were evaluated in the final analysis. Forty-one percent were women, median age was 82 years (Q1: 76, Q3: 86), 18.4% received a permanent pacemaker following TAVR, and 88.5% received a balloon expandable valve. We demonstrate an increase in mortality risk with higher AVCS after multivariable adjustment (P<0.001). When stratified by sex, every 500-unit increase in AVCS was associated with a 7% increase in mortality risk among women (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.12]) but not in men.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate a notable sex difference in the association between AVCS and long-term mortality in a large TAVR patient sample. This study highlights the potential value of AVCS in preprocedural risk stratification, specifically among women undergoing TAVR. Additional studies are needed to validate this finding.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis

Background

Though the co-prevalence of aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is increasingly recognized, the role of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with CA remains unclear.

Methods

The National Readmission Dataset (2016–18) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify those with CA and AS, in conjunction with TAVR status. The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF) readmissions and all-cause mortality. All outcomes were followed up to 1-year with a median follow up time 172-days. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate cox-proportional hazard regression were used for time-to-event analysis.

Results

Of 1,127 CA patients, 92 (8.2%) had undergone TAVR. Patients with CA who received TAVR were younger and more commonly had coronary artery disease (67.3% vs 44.2%). Teaching (93.6% vs 81.1%) and large hospitals (77.7% vs 59.3%) performed more TAVRs. In multivariate analysis, TAVR was associated with an improved primary outcome (8.9% vs 24.4%, HR:0.32; 95% CI 0.14–0.71, p = 0.007) and with reduced HF readmissions (3.8% vs 19.4%, HR:0.22; 95% CI 0.07–0.68, p = 0.008). All-cause mortality was numerically lower in TAVR patients with CA but did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

CA patients who receive TAVR are younger, and the procedure is more commonly performed at large, teaching hospitals. TAVR was associated with a lower primary composite outcome of HF readmissions and all-cause mortality.

Clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients younger than 70 years rejected for surgery: the AMTRAC registry

BACKGROUND

The mean age of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients is steadily decreasing.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to describe the characteristics, the indications for and the outcomes of TAVI in patients <70 years old.

METHODS

All patients undergoing TAVI (n=8,626) from the 18 participating centres between January 2007 and June 2020 were stratified by age (</>70). For patients <70, the indications for TAVI were extracted from Heart Team discussions and the baseline characteristics and mortality were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 640 (7.4%) patients were <70 (9.1% during 2018-2020, p<0.001); the mean age was 65.0±2.3 years. The younger patients were more often male, with bicuspid valves or needing valve-in-valve procedures. They had a higher prevalence of lung disease and diabetes. In 80.7% of cases, the Heart Team estimated an increased surgical risk and TAVI was selected, reflected by an STS score >4% in 20.4%. Five-year mortality was similar (29.4 vs 29.8%, HR 0.95, p=0.432) in the <70 and >70 groups. In the <70 group, mortality was higher for those referred for TAVI due to an increased surgical risk compared to those referred for other reasons (31.6 vs 24.5%, HR 1.23, p=0.021). Mortality was similar regardless of the STS stratum in patients judged by the Heart Team to be at increased surgical risk (32.6 vs 30.4%, HR 0.98, p=0.715).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of TAVI in patients <70 is becoming more frequent. The main reason for choosing TAVI is due to an increased surgical risk not adequately represented by the STS score. The outcomes for these patients are similar to those for older TAVI patients. Dedicated trials of TAVI/SAVR in younger patients are needed to guide decisions concerning expansion of TAVI indications. ((ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04031274).