Impact of insulin treatment in diabetic macular edema therapy in type 2 diabetes

Comparison of clinical characteristics, microvascular complications and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetic patients under insulin versus metformin treatment: A cross-sectional study at Karbala Diabetic Center, Iraq

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major global health issue associated with chronic inflammation, which contributes to both disease progression and its complications, including cardiovascular and microvascular disorders. Key inflammatory markers such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6 (IL-6), E-selectin, and P-selectin are elevated in T2DM patients and are implicated in the development of these complications. Understanding how treatments such as insulin and metformin affect these markers is crucial for improving therapeutic strategies in T2DM. This study investigated the effects of insulin and metformin on these inflammatory markers in T2DM patients. This was a cross-sectional study involving patients with diabetes on insulin (group A), metformin only (group B), and healthy controls (group C). Participants were enrolled from the Diabetic Center in Karbala, Iraq and underwent clinical assessments including ophthalmologic examinations. Fasting blood glucose, HbA1c and lipids levels were assessed. The levels of inflammatory markers (IL-6 and TNF-α), and adhesion molecules (sE-selectin and sP-selectin) were measured using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The study included 522 patients with diabetes: 356 receiving insulin (group A), 70 receiving metformin (group B) and 96 healthy controls (group C). T2DM patients treated with insulin exhibited significantly more microvascular complications than those treated with metformin. Higher rates of retinopathy (64.3% vs 11.4%) and neuropathy (69.9% vs 11.4%) were observed in the insulin group, whereas the incidence of nephropathy did not differ significantly (14.6% vs 11.4%). Inflammatory markers were lower in the insulin group: TNF-α levels were 3-fold lower and IL-6 levels were 8-fold lower. Conversely, sE-selectin levels were 1.5-fold higher in the insulin group, and sP-selectin levels were 1.4-fold higher in the metformin group. This study highlights distinct differences in inflammatory markers and systemic complications between T2DM patients treated with insulin and those treated with metformin alone. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms underlying these observations and optimize treatment strategies for T2DM patients.

Reduced serum magnesium is associated with the occurrence of diabetic macular edema in patients with diabetic retinopathy: A retrospective study

Serum magnesium levels have been reported to reflect the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR); however, the effect of serum magnesium level on diabetic macular edema (DME) remains unclear. Here, we investigated the association between the serum magnesium levels and DME in patients with DR. Patients with DR were recruited between January 2018 and June 2021. A total of 519 such patients were included in this study. All patients underwent a standardized clinical ophthalmic examination by an experienced ophthalmologist, and an assay was conducted to determine the serum magnesium concentration. Compared with the non-DME group, the DME group had a higher proportion of insulin use and a higher level of serum ischemia-modified albumin and fasting plasma glucose. The serum magnesium and calcium levels were lower in the DME group than in the non-DME group (P < 0.05). Higher magnesium levels were negatively associated with DME after adjustment for relevant covariates. Compared with the participants in the lowest magnesium quartile, those in the fourth quartile showed a significantly lower risk of DME after adjustment [odds ratio (OR), 0.294; 95% confidence interval, 0.153–0.566; P < 0.0001]. Considering the potentially different effects of serum magnesium on the development of DME in patients with DR based on age, DR staging and insulin use, stratified analysis was performed by considering these factors. Among insulin-using patients with non-proliferative DR who were < 66 years of age, those in the third and fourth quartile of serum magnesium were less likely to develop DME than those in the lowest quartile of serum magnesium [OR (95% CI), 0.095 (0.014–0.620), 0.057 (0.011–0.305); P = 0.014, 0.001]. Overall, a higher serum magnesium level was associated with a lower risk of DME in patients with DR. Furthermore, patients with DR who used insulin were more likely to develop DME. Long-term studies on oral magnesium supplements are needed to determine whether maintaining the serum magnesium levels in a higher physiological range can reduce the risk of DME in patients with DR.

The effect of insulin on response to intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in diabetic macular edema in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objectives

To assess whether insulin therapy impacts the effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

This was a retrospective multi-center analysis. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months, BCVA change, central macular thickness (CMT), CMT change, and cumulative injection number were compared between the insulin and the oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) groups.

Results

The mean final BCVA and CMT improved in both the insulin (N = 137; p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively) and the OHA group (N = 61; p = 0.199; p < 0.001, respectively). The two treatment groups were comparable for final BCVA (p = 0.263), BCVA change (p = 0.184), final CMT (p = 0.741), CMT change (p = 0.458), and the cumulative injections received (p = 0.594). The results were comparable between the two groups when stratified by baseline vision (p > 0.05) and baseline HbA1c (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Insulin therapy does not alter treatment outcomes for anti-VEGF therapy in DME.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02325-x.

The association between different hypoglycemic regimens and postoperative diabetic macular edema after vitrectomy in the Japanese patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

To study the association between different hypoglycemic regimens and postoperative diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

A secondary analysis based on a retrospective cohort study.

RESULTS

In this secondary analysis, 124 eyes from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) between January 2008 and September 2012 were included. We found that compared with oral hypoglycemic medication, oral hypoglycemic medication plus insulin treatment revealed an insignificant relationship with postoperative DME (odds ratio [OR]=0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-5.21, P=0.8167), only insulin treatment revealed a significant association with postoperative DME (OR=0.10, 95% CI: 0.01-0.84, P=0.0337) after adjusted age, sex. After adjusted age, sex, diabetes mellitus (DM) duration, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), the results did not have obvious changes (OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.09-4.26, P=0.6187; OR=0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.65, P=0.0197). Furthermore, after adjusted age, sex, DM duration, HbA1c, hypertension, intraoperative retinal photocoagulation, vitreous hemorrhage, macular detachment, fibrovascular membrane, intraocular lens implantation and microincision vitrectomy surgery, the results were consistent (OR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.05-9.49, P=0.7621; OR=0.06, 95% CI: 0.00-0.81, P=0.0342). The same trend was observed in these adjusted models as well (p for trend was 0.0254, 0.0141, and 0.0311, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our results of the secondary analysis should be interpreted as a significant association between insulin treatment and reduced risks of postoperative DME in Japanese PDR patients with PPV surgery, compared with oral medications. Well glycemic control with longstanding insulin therapy may be beneficial to reduce the risks of postoperative DME in PDR patients. Our investigation calls for large-scale and long-term prospective clinical studies for a full evaluation of the exact role of insulin in the progression of postoperative DME.

[Lack of correlation between retinal variables before treatment and poor functional response after focal photocoagulation in diabetic macular oedema]

BACKGROUND

Although photocoagulation reduces the incidence of moderate visual loss in eyes with focal diabetic macular oedema, some eyes may lose some vision after treatment. The proportion of eyes with poor functional response after photocoagulation, and whether any retinal variable is associated with this, is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of eyes with diabetic macular oedema that have a poor functional response after focal photocoagulation, and their associated features.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A non-experimental, longitudinal, comparative and retrospective study was conducted. The proportion and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of diabetics with macular oedema that had a poor functional response after focal photocoagulation (any visual loss after 6 weeks) were identified. The means of retinal variables before treatment were compared between eyes with and without a poor functional response using the Student t test for independent means.

RESULTS

The study included 115 eyes of patients aged 59.3 (SD 9.24) years. Visual acuity was greater than or equal to 0.5 in 63 eyes (54.8%). A total of 33 eyes had a poor functional response after photocoagulation (28.7%, 95% CI: 13.3 to 44.1). The comparison between retinal variables and visual acuity before treatment did not show any differences between eyes with or without a poor functional response and eyes.

CONCLUSION

Retinal thickening and visual acuity improved or did not change in 71.3% of eyes with diabetic macular oedema with a single photocoagulation procedure. Retinal variables that are usually evaluated were unable to identify the remaining 28.7%, which could lose vision after that treatment, and would require additional interventions.

Updates in the management of diabetic macular edema

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease which has multiple effects on different end-organs, including the retina. In this paper, we discuss updates on diabetic macular edema (DME) and the management options. The underlying pathology of DME is the leakage of exudates from retinal microaneurysms, which trigger subsequent inflammatory reactions. Both clinical and imaging techniques are useful in diagnosing, classifying, and gauging the severity of DME. We performed a comprehensive literature search using the keywords "diabetes," "macula edema," "epidemiology," "pathogenesis," "optical coherence tomography," "intravitreal injections," "systemic treatment," "hypertension," "hyperlipidemia," "anemia," and "renal disease" and collated a total of 47 relevant articles published in English language. The main modalities of treatment currently in use comprise laser photocoagulation, intravitreal pharmacological and selected systemic pharmacological options. In addition, we mention some novel therapies that show promise in treating DME. We also review systemic factors associated with exacerbation or improvement in DME.