De-insurance in Ontario has reduced use of eye care services by the socially disadvantaged

Socioeconomic status and vision care utilization in Canada: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Despite a universal health care system, access to vision care in Canada is not necessarily equally accessible to all patients. The purpose of this review was to explore the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and vision care utilization in Canada.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched from inception to January 2024 for relevant articles containing original data. Studies that explored the association between SES and vision care utilization in Canadian patients were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and AXIS assessment tools. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. The review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024502482) and followed PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2,670 records with 23 studies included in this review. The included studies covered all provinces and ranged in date between 1985 and 2022. The included studies explored the relationship between SES and utilization of ophthalmic care, optometric care, or both. Overall, 17 of the 23 studies found that patients of lower SES were significantly more likely to have decreased usage of vision care. Decreased vision care utilization was found for all optometry, ophthalmology care, and diabetic retinopathy screening, as well as for patients of all ages, and in all provinces.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Low socioeconomic status was consistently associated with decreased vision care utilization for patients of all ages. Efforts are required to increase accessibility to vision care for low-income individuals and to improve health equity.

Charity Care in Ophthalmology, 2024

PURPOSE

To review changes in the provision of charity eye care in the past 50 years with hypothesized resulting effects on surgical training and patient outcomes.

DESIGN

Perspective.

METHODS

Case report, comparison of experience in community and training program settings, and selected literature review.

RESULTS

The population to which charity care applies has shrunk as broader insurance coverage has been legislated, but in 2023 remains at approximately 7.3% of the US population. In areas with ophthalmology training programs, house staff supervised by faculty provide most of the charity care. In areas without training programs, a shrinking pool of willing private practitioners provides charity care. Because there is no organized financial support behind provision of charity, nonanecdotal data needed to assess the problem and guide decision making are lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

Charity eye care in ophthalmology in 2024 is a patchwork of transient, local efforts that have a few common themes: absent material basis for sustainability, a narrowing base of support by clinicians, transfer of care to training programs, and financial vetting of applicants by nonclinicians. Unless universal health care legislation passes, which would eliminate the issue, suggestions for improvement include broader voluntary participation by private practice ophthalmologists in charity eye care, allocation of charity care spending by nonprofit hospitals to support this effort, and clinician-determined criteria for provision of charitable surgery supported by involved hospital systems.

Dermoscopy can be safely and reliably used in ophthalmology

Objective

To determine if dermoscopy, a technique widely utilized in dermatology for improved diagnosis of skin lesions, can be used comfortably for evaluating periorbital, eyelid, and conjunctival lesions.

Design

Proof-of-concept study in which a technique for performing dermoscopy near the eye was developed, related educational material was prepared, and a protocol for dermoscopic image capture was created.

Methods

Technicians used the developed materials to learn to take high-quality pictures with a 10x dermoscope attached to a standard cell phone camera. The images were assessed for diagnostic utility by an oculoplastic surgeon and two dermatologists.

Participants

115 patients recruited from ophthalmology clinics from July 2021 to April 2023 were photographed, yielding 129 lesions with high-quality dermoscopic images as assessed by an oculoplastic surgeon and two dermatologists.

Results

Technicians reported a significant increase in confidence (measured on a 1-10 scale) with dermoscopy after training (pre-instruction mean = 1.72, median = 1, mode = 1, IQR = 1.25 vs mean = 7.69, median = 7.75, mode = 7 and 8, IQR = 1.5 post-instruction. Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, W = 0, p < 0.001, paired t = 13.95, p < 0.0001). Incorporating a contact plate with a 4 × 4mm reticule on the dermoscope aided in photographing ocular and periocular lesions.

Conclusion

Medical support staff in eye-care offices can be taught to use dermoscopes to capture high-quality images of periorbital, eyelid, and conjunctival lesions. Dermoscopy illuminates diagnostic features of lesions and thus offers a new avenue to improve decision-making in ophthalmology. Dermoscopy can be incorporated into telemedicine evaluations by ophthalmologists, oculoplastic surgeons, or affiliated dermatologists for triage of or rendering advice to patients and for planning of surgery if needed.

Expanding the scope of an eConsult service: acceptability and feasibility of an optometry–ophthalmology pilot project

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and acceptability of connecting optometrists to ophthalmologists on an eConsult service.

DESIGN

Descriptive analysis of utilization data and an anonymous survey.

PARTICIPANTS

All eConsult cases sent by optometrists between March 2019 and February 2020 (utilization data); optometrists and ophthalmologists participating in the eConsult Vision Pilot Project (survey).

METHODS

Utilization data for the study period were collected automatically and underwent descriptive analysis. Participating optometrists and ophthalmologists received an email invitation to a survey assessing the project.

RESULTS

Thirteen optometrists from 5 clinics in the southeast region and 7 ophthalmologists were recruited to participate in the pilot project. Optometrists sent 109 eConsults in a 13-month period, representing 33% of all cases submitted to ophthalmology through the eConsult service provincially (March 2019-March 2020). Sixty-eight percent of respondents to an anonymous online survey valued the recruitment and engagement of eye care professionals from the same health region. The influence of the eConsult service was reported to have a "somewhat positive" (27%) to "very positive" (50%) influence on the relationship between the two professional groups.

CONCLUSION

The eConsult Vision Pilot Project fills a gap in service and provides an opportunity for patients to get access to specialty advice. We demonstrated that allowing optometrists to solicit specialist advice from ophthalmologists was acceptable and feasible.

Impact of discontinuing government-funded routine eye exams on new glaucoma diagnoses in Ontario

OBJECTIVE

In 2004, government-funded routine eye exams were discontinued for individuals aged 20-64 years in Ontario. We assessed whether this policy change reduced the rate of new glaucoma diagnoses.

DESIGN

Cohort-based time-series analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Ontarians aged 20+ years in 2000-2014.

METHODS

Province-wide physician billing data were analyzed using segmented regression analysis. New glaucoma diagnoses were defined as the first glaucoma diagnostic billing code submitted by an ophthalmologist or optometrist among Ontarians who did not visit an ophthalmologist or an optometrist in the year prior to the study year.

RESULTS

Before versus after 2004, the rate of new glaucoma billings was reduced in all age groups: -2.7% (p < 0.0001) in the age group 20-39 years, -8.2% (p < 0.0001) in the age group 40-64 years (p < 0.0001), and -2.1% (p = 0.0003) in the age group 65+ years. This corresponds to a decreased number of individuals with a new glaucoma billing after 2004 versus before 2004: -8,800 (p < 0.001) in the age group 20-39 years, -32,234 (p < 0.0001) in the age group 40-64 years, and -3,255 (p = 0.0012) in the age group 65+ years. Reduced rates of new glaucoma diagnostic billings were seen in males, females and rural and urban residents among policy-affected and policy-unaffected age groups. Ontarians living in the wealthiest neighbourhood areas also had a significantly reduced rate after versus before 2004: -2.7% (p < 0.0001) for the age group 20-39 years, -9.0% (p < 0.0001) for the age group 40-64 years, and -2.3 % (p < 0.001) for the age group 65+ years.

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of government-funding for routine eye exams was associated with a significantly reduced rate of new glaucoma diagnostic billings irrespective of sociodemographics. More research is needed to understand the reduced glaucoma billings in unaffected seniors and those living in the wealthiest neighbourhood areas.

Frequency and source of prescription eyewear insurance coverage in Ontario: a repeated population-based cross-sectional study using survey data

BACKGROUND

Insurance coverage may reduce cost barriers to obtain vision correction. Our aim was to determine the frequency and source of prescription eyewear insurance to understand how Canadians finance optical correction.

METHODS

We conducted a repeated population-based cross-sectional study using 2003, 2005 and 2013-2014 Canadian Community Health Survey data from respondents aged 12 years or older from Ontario, Canada. In this group, the cost of prescription eyewear is not covered by the government unless one is registered with a social assistance program or belongs to a specific population. We determined the frequency and source of insurance coverage for prescription eyewear in proportions. We used survey weights provided by Statistics Canada in all analyses to account for sample selection, a complex survey, and adjustments for seasonal effect, poststratification, nonresponse and calibration. We compared unadjusted proportions and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of having insurance.

RESULTS

Insurance covered all or part of the costs of prescription eyewear for 62% of Ontarians in all 3 survey years. Of those insured, 84.1%-86.0% had employer-sponsored coverage, 9.0%-10.3% had government-sponsored coverage, and 5.7%-6.8% had private plans. Employer-sponsored coverage remained constant for those in households with postsecondary graduation but decreased significantly for those in households with less than secondary school graduation, from 67.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.2%-70.8%) (n = 175 000) in 2005 to 54.6% (95% CI 50.1%-59.2%) (n = 123 500) in 2013-2014. Government-sponsored coverage increased significantly for those in households with less than secondary school graduation, from 29.2% (95% CI 25.5%-32.9%) (n = 76 400) in 2005 to 41.7% (95% CI 37.2%-46.1%) (n = 93 900) in 2013-2014. In 2013-2014, Ontarians in households with less than secondary school graduation were less likely than those with secondary school graduation to report employer-sponsored coverage (adjusted PR 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.84) but were more likely to have government-sponsored coverage (adjusted PR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06-1.53).

INTERPRETATION

Sixty-two percent of Ontarians had prescription eyewear insurance in 2003, 2005 and 2013-2014; the largest source of insurance was employers, primarily covering those with higher education levels, whereas government-sponsored insurance increased significantly among those with lower education levels. Further research is needed to elucidate barriers to obtaining prescription eyewear and the degree to which affordability impairs access to vision correction.

Patient Perspectives on Removing Adult Tonsillectomy and Septoplasty from the Government Health Insurance Plan in a Publicly Funded Health Care System

In several publicly funded health care systems, including Ontario, Canada, adult tonsillectomies and septoplasties have been suggested to be removed or "delisted" from the government health insurance plan. Thus, the objective of this study was to explore patient perspectives regarding out of pocket (OOP) payment for these procedures. An anonymous survey was administered to patients consented to undergo a tonsillectomy or septoplasty at a community otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) practice. The survey asked patients if they would pay the projected cost for their surgery OOP and the maximum amount of time they would wait for their surgery. The survey also contained questions on socioeconomic status and disease severity. Seventy-one patients were included. Overall, 21% of patients were willing to pay OOP for their surgery. Forty-nine percent of patients reported that the maximum amount of time they would be willing to wait for their surgery was 2 to 6 months. There was no significant correlation found between any of the demographic variables or disease severity and willingness to pay OOP for these surgeries. In this study, a small percentage of patients who met the clinical indications for a tonsillectomy or a septoplasty would pay for their surgery in the event that it was not covered by the government health insurance plan. These surgeries are common operations and delisting them could potentially decrease the provision of these services and have a significant impact on Canadian OHNS practices.

Identifying gaps in patient access to diabetic screening eye examinations in Ontario: a provincially representative cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes is the leading cause of acquired blindness in Canadians under the age of 50 years, and diabetic retinopathy affects an estimated 500 000 Canadians. Early identification of retinopathy with screening eye examinations allows for secondary prevention. To understand the need for resource allotment in diabetic screening, we undertook a cross-sectional study of key demographics and geographics of screened and unscreened patients in Ontario.

METHODS

Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) records were derived from physician and optometry billing, matched with patients aged >19 years with prevalent diabetes between 2011 and 2013. Data were cross-correlated with demographic covariates, including age, sex, income quintile, immigrant status, as well as geographic covariates such as rurality and patient Local Health Integration Network (LHIN).

RESULTS

Of almost 1 146 000 patients included in the analysis, approximately 406 000 were unscreened. Of note, this included 234 000 adults aged 40-64 years. Approximately 818 000 patients with diabetes lived in large cities, and 301 000 (37%) were unscreened. When the City of Toronto was analyzed as an urban area with the highest density of unscreened prevalence, autocorrelation between the percentage of eye examinations among patients with diabetes aged >40 years and low-income revealed that large areas of Toronto Central correlated for low examination rates and low income. The majority (13/22) of Community Health Centres are present in these areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Large cross-sectional population statistics for diabetes prevalence and ophthalmic examinations provides a geographic and socioeconomic profile for populations of middle-aged adults in large urban areas at risk for developing diabetic retinopathy and who might benefit from interventions to improve the rates of screening eye examinations.

Delisted routine eye examinations for nonrefractive eye conditions: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

In 2004, Ontario delisted routine eye examinations for people aged 20-64 years, potentially encouraging patients seeking eye care to visit government-insured primary care providers (PCPs) rather than optometrists whose services had been deinsured. We investigated if utilization of PCP services for nonrefractive eye conditions increased after 2004 among Ontarians who were affected by the delisting.

METHODS

We conducted a comparative analysis of the utilization of PCP services for nonrefractive eye conditions in Ontario using administrative data from 2000 to 2014. We included participants without a visit to government-insured optometrists or ophthalmologists in the year before the study year; we excluded participants with existing diabetes. Changes in utilization before and after delisting were statistically assessed using segmented regression analysis in subgroups stratified by age, sex, rurality and neighbourhood income.

RESULTS

A significant increase in utilization of PCP services for nonrefractive ocular diagnoses after 2004 was documented among people affected by the delisting: 17.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.0% to 18.7%) for people aged 20-39 years and 11.6% (95% CI 10.6% to 12.5%) for people aged 40-64 years. This corresponds to an increase in the number of patients who visited PCPs for nonrefractive ocular diagnoses of 10 690 (95% CI 321 to 21 059) for people aged 20-39 years and 20 682 (95% CI -94 to 41 457) for people aged 40-64 years. Among people aged 65 years and older (an age group not affected by the delisting), utilization of PCP services for nonrefractive ocular diagnoses was stable (p = 0.95) throughout the study period. Changes in utilization of PCP services for nonocular diagnoses were nonsignificant among people aged 0-19, 40-64 and 65 years and older.

INTERPRETATION

After delisting, utilization of the services of government-funded PCPs for nonrefractive ocular diagnoses significantly increased among Ontarians affected by the delisting. The impact on ocular outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of increased use of PCPs for ocular management warrants further investigation and policy-makers' consideration.

Delisting eye examinations from public health insurance: Empirical evidence from Canada regarding impacts on patients and providers

This paper examines the impacts of delisting routine eye exam services on patient eye care utilization and on providers' labour market outcomes in a public healthcare system. Provincial governments in Canada started to de-insure routine eye examinations from the basket of publicly insured healthcare services in the early 1990s. We explore these policy changes across Canadian provinces to estimate the impacts of delisting from the supply- and demand-sides. Demand side analysis suggests that, on average, for the working age population delisting decreased the probability of using eye care. However, the number of visits among those who continued to use eye care services did not change. Additionally, the delisting may have had unintended consequences by causing a large negative impact among low-income individuals, and there is suggestive evidence of a positive spillover on utilization by publicly-funded patients over age 64. On the supply side, using Canadian census data we find that delisting eye exams decreased optometrists' weekly work hours, raised their annual work weeks and had little effect on their income.

[Who visits an ophthalmologist and how often? Results of the German nationwide adult health survey (DEGS1)]

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of eye diseases increases in the second half of life, especially cataract, glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration. In this study we examined the influencing factors for visiting an ophthalmologist in the last 12 months.

METHODS

Visits to an ophthalmologist's practice in the last 12 months and the frequency were surveyed in the German nationwide adult health survey wave 1 (DEGS1) study (baseline examination from 2008 to 2011, N = 7987, 52.6% women, age 18-79 years). Data on utilization were processed by taking the complex study design into consideration. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine associated factors including age, sex, socioeconomic status, place of residence, type of health insurance (e.g. statutory or private) and diabetes.

RESULTS

Between the ages of 18 and 79 years, 29.3% of survey participants in Germany visited an ophthalmologist in the last year, while after the age of 60 years this was only 50.4%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed an association with female sex (odds ratio OR = 1.51, p < 0.001), older age, type of health insurance (private vs. statutory: OR = 0.77, p = 0.006) and diabetes (OR = 3.84, p < 0.001), but no association with socioeconomic status (p = 0.29) or place of residence (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Approximately one third of the German population visit an ophthalmologist at least once a year. Especially diabetics showed a high utilization of ophthalmological consultations, which could be based on the interdisciplinary guidelines for early detection of diabetic eye complications.

Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for late presentation of glaucoma in Canada

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of socioeconomic status on late presentation of glaucoma.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

Eligible subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma underwent a comprehensive ocular examination and were classified as mild, moderate, or advanced according to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society glaucoma guidelines. Socioeconomic status was estimated by linking the subjects' postal code to the median household income in the 2006 Canadian population census at the level of dissemination areas. Five equal income groups ranging from the lowest to the highest income quintile were considered and compared regarding the frequency and proportion of moderate or advanced glaucoma.

RESULTS

A total of 290 subjects were included in the analysis; 151 (52.1%) had mild, 79 (26.9%) moderate, and 60 (21.0%) advanced disease at initial diagnosis. Patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma were less likely to come from the poorest neighborhood areas (16.21%) when compared with an expected one fifth (20%) of patients presented in each of the 5 social economic groups (P = 0.56). Compared with people from the poorest neighborhood areas, people from the richest neighborhood areas had a marginally lower risk for having moderate or advanced glaucoma at first presentation (prevalence ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-1.02, P = 0.06). This association was stronger among those ≥65 years old (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in Canada to provide evidence that socioeconomic deprivation is associated with greater severity of glaucoma at presentation, specifically for those ≥65 years old. Consideration should be given to targeting poor neighborhood areas for glaucoma education, screening, or both.

Beyond barriers in studying disparities in women's access to health services in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative metasynthesis

Women live within complex and differing social, economic, and environmental circumstances that influence options to seek health care. In this article we report on a metasynthesis of qualitative research concerning access disparities for women in the Canadian province of Ontario, where there is a publicly funded health care system. We took a metastudy approach to analysis of results from 35 relevant qualitative articles to understand the conditions and conceptualizations of women's inequitable access to health care. The articles' authors attributed access disparities to myriad barriers. We focused our analysis on these barriers to understand the contributing social and political forces. We found that four major, sometimes countervailing, forces shaped access to health care: (a) contextual conditions, (b) constraints, (c) barriers, and (d) deterrents. Complex convergences of these forces acted to push, pull, obstruct, and/or repel women as they sought health care, resulting in different patterns of inequitable access.

Unintended consequences of delisting routine eye exams on retinopathy screening for people with diabetes in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Routine eye examinations for healthy adults aged 20-64 years were delisted from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan in 2004, but they continue to be insured for people with diabetes regardless of age. We sought to assess whether the delisting of routine eye examinations for healthy adults had the unintended consequence of decreasing retinopathy screening for adults with diabetes.

METHODS

We used administrative data to calculate eye examinations for people with diabetes ages 40-64 years and 65 years and older in each 2-year period from 1998 to 2010. We examined differences by sex, income, rurality and type of health care provider. We used segmented linear regression to assess the change in trend before and after 2004.

RESULTS

For people with diabetes aged 65 years and older, eye examinations rose gradually from 1998 to 2010, with no substantial change between 2004 and 2006. For people with diabetes aged 40-65 years, there was an 8.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.3%-11.1%) decrease in eye examinations between 2004 and 2006. Results were similar for all population subgroups. Ophthalmologic examinations decreased steadily for both age groups during the study period, and there was a decline in optometry examinations for people ages 40-65 years after 2004.

INTERPRETATION

The delisting of routine eye examinations for healthy adults in Ontario had the unintended consequence of reducing publicly funded retinopathy screening for people with diabetes. More research is needed to understand whether patients are being charged for an insured service or to what degree misunderstanding has prevented patients from seeking care.