Effect of aflibercept on refractory macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion

Retinal arterial and vein occlusion: is surgery ever indicated?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the recent progression in surgical treatments for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).

RECENT FINDINGS

Anti-VEGF treatment, accepted as a primary treatment for CRVO, is unable to effectively treat all types of the diseases. Regarding CRAO, there are not any accepted therapies available. There have however been recent innovations in surgery, such as utilizing robotics-assisted tools in cannulation procedures for central retinal artery occlusion, or micro-cystotomy for refractory macular edema resulting from ischemic CRVO.

SUMMARY

Refractory macular edema due to CRVO can be treated with aspiration of the fluid found inside the large cysts often seen in edema. The success rate of micro-cystotomy has been reported at 78% in eyes with refractory macular edema. Recent studies have shown that cannulation with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is effective for eyes with CRAO due to thrombus.Recent cannulation or micro-cystotomy procedures can be enhanced with the use of robotic tools which allow us to perform this difficult procedure more easily. Newly developed technology, and consequent developments in surgical procedures, will allow us to deal with unmet needs for retinal vessel occlusive diseases.

Foveal Thickness Fluctuations in Anti-VEGF Treatment for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of foveal thickness (FT) fluctuation (FTF) on 2-year visual and morphological outcomes of eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) undergoing anti-VEGF treatment for recurrent macular edema (ME) based on a pro re nata regimen.

Design

Retrospective, observational case series.

Participants

We analyzed 141 treatment-naive patients (141 eyes) with CRVO-ME at a multicenter retinal practice.

Methods

We assessed FT using OCT at each study visit. Patients were divided into groups 0, 1, 2, and 3 according to increasing FTF.

Main Outcome Measures

We evaluated the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the length of the foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) band defect measured using OCT, and the association of FTF with VA and EZ band defect length.

Results

The mean baseline logMAR BCVA and FT were 0.65 ± 0.52 (Snellen equivalent range: 20/20-20/2000) and 661.1 ± 257.4 μm, respectively. The mean number of anti-VEGF injections administered was 5.6 ± 3.6. At the final examination, the mean logMAR BCVA and FT values were significantly improved relative to the baseline values (both P < 0.01). During the observation, BCVA longitudinally improved in Groups 0 and 1, remained unchanged in Group 2, and worsened in Group 3. Likewise, the length of the foveal EZ band defect did not increase in Group 0; however, it gradually increased in Groups 1, 2, and 3. Foveal thickness fluctuation was significantly and positively associated with the logMAR BCVA and length of the foveal EZ band defect at the final examination (P < 0.01). The final logMAR BCVA of patients developing neovascular complications was 1.27 ± 0.72 (Snellen equivalent range: 20/50-counting fingers), which was significantly poorer than that of patients without complications (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the neovascular complication rate among the FTF groups (P = 0.106, Fisher exact test).

Conclusions

In eyes receiving anti-VEGF treatment for CRVO-ME, FTF can longitudinally impair the visual acuity and foveal photoreceptor status during the observation period, thus influencing the final outcomes. However, neovascular complications, which would also lead to a poor visual prognosis, may not be associated with FTF.

Financial Disclosures

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Progress on the application of growth factor-related drugs in ophthalmology

Vascular endothelial growth factor（VEGF）, fibroblast growth factor（FGF）, nerve growth factor（NGF）, epidermal growth factor and interferon are important endogenous proteins that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation and regeneration. Biological products targeting growth factors are used in the treatment of ocular diseases such as wet age-related macular degeneration, corneal injury and neurotrophic keratitis. Anti-VEGF drugs can regulate the proliferation of vascular endothelia, reduce the edema and exudation of retinal tissue，which are the main therapeutic agents for wet age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. The basic FGF (b-FGF) can promote the proliferation, differentiation, and migration of corneal epithelial cells, accelerating the healing of the corneal injury and reduces corneal inflammation；and bovine b-FGF has been approved for the treatment of corneal injuries. The NGF promotes the growth, development, and differentiation of central and peripheral neurons, thus accelerating the repair of nerve damage；and the European Medicines Agency approved the use of nerve growth factor for the treatment of neurotrophic keratitis in 2017. Recent clinical studies show that patients with moderate or severe neurotrophic keratitis achieved complete corneal healing following 8 weeks of NGF therapy. Epidermal growth factor derivative eye drops have been approved for the treatment of corneal epithelial injuries. Recombinant human interferon has been clinically used in the treatment of ocular viral infections. This article reviews the research progress in the development of new cell growth factor drugs for the treatment of ophthalmic diseases, to provide insights for expanding the application of cell growth factors in ophthalmology.

[Retinal vein occlusion : Intravitreal pharmacotherapies and treatment strategies for the management of macular edema]

Intravitreal injection treatment for the management of macular edema as an expression of increased capillary permeability and leakage constitute the mainstay of treatment in retinal vein occlusion. In contrast to diabetic retinopathy or neovascular age-related macular degeneration, permanent and complete functional and morphological restoration can be achieved, as retinal vein occlusions are usually associated with risk factors, but do not represent the manifestation form of an underlying systemic or degenerative chronic disorder; however, successful long-term management of retinal vein occlusion -associated macular edema usually requires intensive and also long-term continued treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or with a less favorable side effect profile, dexamethasone. A functional treatment success can be maintained over the long term by both pro re nata (PRN) or treat and extend (T&E) regimens. In contrast, according to the currently available data, the combination of anti-VEGF administration and grid laser treatment has no additional benefit compared to monotherapy. In patients with recalcitrant macular edema, switching to another intravitreal agent may be considered during the course of treatment, although a true therapeutic benefit with respect to the development of visual acuity has not yet been proven. The current review summarizes the relevant aspects in the management of RVO-associated macular edema and provides the foundations for the application of successful treatment strategies.

Anti-VEGF-Resistant Retinal Diseases: A Review of the Latest Treatment Options

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy currently plays a central role in the treatment of numerous retinal diseases, most notably exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusions. While offering significant functional and anatomic benefits in most patients, there exists a subset of 15–40% of eyes that fail to respond or only partially respond. For these cases, various treatment options have been explored with a range of outcomes. These options include steroid injections, laser treatment (both thermal therapy for retinal vascular diseases and photodynamic therapy for eAMD), abbreviated anti-VEGF treatment intervals, switching anti-VEGF agents and topical medications. In this article, we review the effectiveness of these treatment options along with a discussion of the current research into future directions for anti-VEGF-resistant eyes.

Patient-reported outcomes from a phase IV study of aflibercept in patients with refractory retinal vein occlusions

PURPOSE

To determine the patient-centered effectiveness of switching patients with persistent macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) to aflibercept using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI-VFQ-25).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective study of eyes with persistent cystoid macular edema due to RVO despite regular treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab switched to aflibercept. Three loading doses of intravitreal aflibercept were administered every 4 weeks and thereafter every 8 weeks until week 48. Vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) using NEI-VFQ-25 was measured at baseline, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks following the switch. Baseline scores were compared to week 24 and 48 using paired t-test. Relationship between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the study eye and the NEI-VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores was investigated.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with RVO were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 70.3 ± 8.6 years. The mean change in BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to 48 weeks was +20.6 ± 5.2 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Score letters and -109.2 ± 82.8 µm, respectively. VRQoL improved significantly, with an increase of mean NEI-VFQ composite score of 11.5 ± 9.5; the corresponding improvements in near and distant activities were 13.3 ± 19.4 and 8.4 ± 10.4, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that BCVA gain of >15 letters and CMT < 300 µm at the end of the study predicted a higher change in VFQ-25.

CONCLUSION

Switching eyes with persistent macular edema due to RVO to aflibercept resulted in significant improvement in visual function and patient satisfaction.

Ranibizumab and aflibercept intravitreal injection for treatment naïve and refractory macular oedema in branch retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND

Branch retinal vein occlusion complicated by macular oedema is a common disease treated with intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Controversy exists surrounding anti-vascular endothelial growth factor selection for both treatment naïve and refractory cases.

METHODS

A retrospective electronic medical record review at a single UK centre generated a cohort of 259 treatment naïve eyes from 258 patients receiving ranibizumab, aflibercept or a combination (n = 83, 97 and 79, respectively) from 2013 to 2018 with ⩾6 months follow-up. Number of intravitreal injections, visual acuity and macular oedema presence were noted at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. A subgroup analysis examined refractory cases switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept (n = 77) or maintained on ranibizumab (n = 35).

RESULTS

Eyes receiving ranibizumab or aflibercept had equivocal vision gain at 1 year, 8.0 (95% CI 5.0-11.0) and 9.6 (7.2-12.1) Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, respectively. About 35.6% had no macular oedema at 12 months with ranibizumab compared with 50.0% with aflibercept (p = 0.07) following 5.1 (4.7-5.6) and 6.0 (5.6-6.4) intravitreal injections, respectively. Visual prognosis declined significantly as treatment delay extended (p = 0.003) which was only apparent with ⩾3 months delay. Eyes with refractory macular oedema also had equivocal functional and anatomical outcomes whether they were maintained on ranibizumab or switched to aflibercept.

CONCLUSION

These real world data demonstrate more modest clinical improvements from anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment than reported in clinical trials. The functional outcomes of ranibizumab and aflibercept in both treatment naïve and refractory cases were equivocal while the anatomical outcomes of aflibercept may be superior.

Effects of Switching to Aflibercept in Treatment Resistant Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine 12-month outcomes of eyes switched from intravitreal ranibizumab or bevacizumab to aflibercept for cystoid macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observation, case series.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed assessing eyes with RVO switched to aflibercept for at least 12 months. To be included in the study, eyes had to have macular edema despite treatment for at least 6 months with bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab before the switch, central foveal thickness (CFT) ≥300 μm at time of switch, and visual acuity (VA) ≤60 early treatment of diabetic retinopathy score (ETDRS) letters (20/40 Snellen equivalent). Outcome measures included change in VA (in ETDRS letters), CFT, and interval between intravitreal injections.

RESULTS

27 eyes of 27 patients were included in the analysis: 13 with branch RVO, and 14 with central RVO. Mean VA before switch was 54.2 ± 23.7 letters (20/80 Snellen equivalent) and mean CFT was 460.4 ± 178.2 μm. Mean number of previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections was 29.5 ± 19.2. At 12 months, mean VA improved by 8.7 ± 13.2 letters (P < 0.01) and mean CFT decreased by 180.9 ± 207.7 μm compared with baseline (P < 0.01). Mean injection interval increased by 1.6 ± 2.0 weeks to 6.9 ± 1.2 weeks, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

In our small retrospective study, eyes switched to intravitreal aflibercept for persistent cystoid macular edema (CME) due to RVO improved vision and macular thickness; however, larger prospective studies are required to validate our findings.

Month 12 Outcomes After Treatment Change at Month 6 Among Poor Responders to Aflibercept or Bevacizumab in Eyes With Macular Edema Secondary to Central or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORE2 Study

Importance

Information is needed to assess switching treatment in eyes with a poor response to 6 months of monthly administration of aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema from central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO).

Objective

To investigate visual acuity letter score (VALS) and central subfield thickness (CST) changes from month 6 to 12 among eyes with a poor response at month 6 to monthly dosing of aflibercept or bevacizumab in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary analysis of the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) was conducted at 66 private practice or academic centers in the United States. Participants included 49 patients (1 eye from each patient evaluated) with CRVO- or HRVO-associated macular edema and a protocol-defined poor response to aflibercept or bevacizumab treatment at month 6. The first month 6 visit occurred on September 8, 2015, and the last month 12 visit occurred on October 24, 2016.

Interventions

Treatment in eyes receiving monthly aflibercept was switched to a dexamethasone implant at month 6 and, if needed, at months 9, 10, or 11. Treatment in eyes receiving monthly bevacizumab was switched to aflibercept at months 6, 7, and 8, and then to a treat-and-extend aflibercept regimen until month 12.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Change from month 6 to 12 in VALS and CST.

Results

Of the 49 participants at month 6, aflibercept treatment had failed in 14 (6 [43%] women; mean [SD] age, 70.4 [13.0] years). Bevacizumab treatment had failed in 35 patients (16 [46%] women; mean age, 70.0 [13.2] years). In 14 eyes with treatment switched from aflibercept to dexamethasone, the estimated mean change from month 6 to 12 in VALS was 2.63 (95% CI, -3.29 to 8.56; P = .37) and 46.0 μm (95% CI, -80.9 to 172.9 μm; P = .46) for CST. In 35 eyes with treatment switched from bevacizumab to aflibercept, the estimated mean change from month 6 to 12 in VALS was 10.27 (95% CI, 6.05-14.49; P < .001) and -125.4 μm (95% CI, -180.9 to -69.9 μm; P < .001) for CST.

Conclusions and Relevance

Eyes treated with aflibercept after a poor response to bevacizumab had improvement in VALS and CST. Few eyes had a poor response to aflibercept, and therefore, few eyes were switched to dexamethasone. Caution is warranted in interpreting these results owing to the small number of eyes and lack of comparison groups. These factors preclude definitive assessment of whether the switching strategy is superior to maintaining treatment.

Prospective study of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions in eyes not responsive to long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab

IMPORTANCE

To examine the effect of switching from intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab to aflibercept in eyes with persistent macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

BACKGROUND

We report the results of a prospective interventional study on the effect of aflibercept 2 mg in eyes with persistent macular oedema after long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

DESIGN

Non-randomized, prospective clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen eyes of eighteen patients were included.

METHODS

Eyes with persistent macular oedema despite a minimum of four previous intravitreal bevacizumab/ranibizumab injections were recruited into this 48-week trial. Three loading doses of intravitreal aflibercept were administered every 4-weeks, thereafter every 8-weeks until week 48.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as measured by early treatment diabetic retinopathy score (ETDRS) and central macular thickness (CMT) as measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients had received a mean of 40.0 ± 17.8 bevacizumab/ranibizumab intravitreal injections prior to switching to aflibercept. The mean number of previous injections administered in the 12-months preceding entry into the study was 10.2 ± 2.4. Mean vision change at week 48 was +21.1 ± 5.1 ETDRS letters in the BRVO group and +18.8 ± 5.9 letters at in the CRVO group (P < .001 for both groups). Mean decrease in CMT was 87.6 ± 48.8 μm and 191.0 ± 128.3 μm, in the BRVO and CRVO groups, respectively (P < .001). Using linear regression analyses, a higher number of previous intravitreal ranibizumab/bevacizumab injections and thicker pre-switch CMT were correlated with greater visual gains.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Switching to aflibercept from bevacizumab or ranibizumab in eyes with persistent macular oedema due to RVO can lead to functional and anatomical improvement. This effect was more obvious in eyes with a greater CMT prior to the switch.

A meta-analysis of patients with treatment-resistant macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions following switching to aflibercept

To systematically review anatomical and functional outcomes of switching therapy from bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab to aflibercept in patients with persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions (RVO). A systematic search of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to branch and central RVO was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases prior to June 2017. The main outcome variables described were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). All results were analysed and pooled using random-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eight studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 137 eyes, incorporating both branch and central RVO. Meta-analysis demonstrated a nonsignificant change in BCVA at 6 and 12 months following switch to aflibercept (4.40 letters, 95% CI: -3.10 to 11.90, p = 0.25 and 3.10 letters, 95% CI: -1.74 to 7.94, p = 0.21, respectively). Significant improvement in mean CMT was observed after switch to aflibercept at 6 (-256.00 μm, 95% CI: -318.00 to -194.00, p < 0.001) but not 12 months (-118.00 μm, 95% CI: -261.00 to 25.00, p = 0.11). Switching from bevacizumab/ranibizumab to aflibercept may improve persistent macular oedema secondary to RVO. However, there may be a limitation in the potential of visual recovery.

Efficacy of Multiple Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants for Refractory Retinal Vein Occlusion-Related Macular Edema and Effect of Prior Vitrectomy

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implants (DEX implant) in patients with treatment-resistant macular edema (ME) owing to branch and central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO/CRVO), and the influence of prior vitrectomy on this treatment. Methods: Multicenter retrospective chart review was performed on 40 CRVO and 32 BRVO eyes with persistent ME despite intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and/or intravitreal triamcinolone, and/or laser therapy. Each patient received ≥1 dexamethasone 700 μg implant between March 2011 and December 2015. Thirteen patients underwent prior vitrectomy. Data were collected on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), time to relapse, and adverse events. Results: At the end of follow-up, BRVO eyes had a lesser CMT reduction from baseline compared to CRVO eyes (-122.50 ± 152.47 μm and -202.26 ± 194.09 μm, respectively). Neither BRVO nor CRVO eyes had a sustained BCVA benefit (P = 0.7041 and P = 0.7027, respectively). Vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes overall had a sustained significant CMT reduction throughout the study with -192.46 ± 172.62 μm and -164.02 ± 180.36 μm, respectively, at final follow-up. Similar time to relapse of 24.4 ± 6.5 and 23.3 ± 13.5 weeks, respectively, was observed. By the end of follow-up, BCVA had only improved in vitrectomized eyes. However, multivariable regression analyses showed no significant association between vitrectomy status and CMT or BCVA change after the first and last injection. Cataract formation and ocular hypertension occurred in 25% and 17%, respectively. Conclusions: Multiple DEX implant are effective in reducing CMT in patients resistant to previous treatments and appear to be similarly effective in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes.

Effect of aflibercept on persistent macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of switching treatment from intravitreal ranibizumab to intravitreal aflibercept on the treatment of refractory macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

In this retrospective study; 12 eyes with refractory macular edema secondary to CRVO after multiple monthly repeated intravitreal 0.5mg/0.05mL ranibizumab injections prior to switching therapy to intravitreal 2mg/0.05mL aflibercept, between March 2012 and April 2016 were reviewed. The follow-up time was 12 months. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), central retinal volume (CRV) and injection interval between baseline and month 1, 3, 6 and 12 after switching therapy to aflibercept were reviewed and evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean baseline CRT decreased from 516±101 mic. to 252±114 mic. at month 12 (P=0.008). Mean baseline CRV decreased from 8.74±2.13 mm³ to 6.82±1.64 mm³ at month 12 (P=0.005). Baseline BCVA improved from 0.73±0.21 to 0.53±0.17 logMAR at month 12 (P=0.004). Mean BCVA gain was two logMar lines (10 letters) at month 12. After switching therapy to aflibercept; the mean injection interval increased significantly from 1.34 months at baseline to 1.86 months at month 12, by an increase of 0.52 months (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal aflibercept is evaluated to be presenting significant visual and anatomical improvements in patients with persistent macular edema due to CRVO despite previous intravitreal ranibizumab.

Real-World Results of Switching Treatment from Ranibizumab to Aflibercept in Macular Oedema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Introduction

To investigate treatment outcomes after switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept intravitreal injections in patients with macular oedema (MO) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

Eligible patients with refractory MO secondary to BRVO, post treatment with a minimum of three intravitreal injections of ranibizumab at 4-weekly intervals were recruited. Suboptimal or non-responders were defined as patients who had persistent intraretinal fluid (< 75% decrease from baseline) despite a minimum of three consecutive injections. These patients were switched to aflibercept injections on an as-needed basis. The primary study outcomes assessed trends in best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). To compare means of BCVA and CRT, a paired t test two-tailed with a level of significance set at 0.05 was used. Pearson correlation coefficient was also applied to demonstrate correlation. Participants were followed up for a period of 24 weeks after switching.

Results

Thirty-eight eyes of 38 patients were included in the study. Patients had an average of 8.37 ranibizumab intravitreal injections over a mean period of 12 months presenting suboptimal or no response. A significant decrease of mean CRT from 388.63 ± 93.4 μm to 290.29 ± 93.5 μm (p < 0.001) and an improvement in mean BCVA from logMAR 0.66 ± 0.38 to logMAR 0.57 ± 0.27 (p = 0.025) was achieved after an average of 2.27 aflibercept injections.

Conclusions

Given the spectrum of therapies available to date for the management of MO secondary to BRVO, aflibercept appears to be an effective treatment option in cases refractory to ranibizumab. This study based on a small cohort of patients indicates that satisfactory results on retinal anatomy and visual outcomes can be accomplished with a smaller number of injections. Larger-scale studies are needed to extrapolate these promising results.

EFFICACY AND FREQUENCY OF INTRAVITREAL AFLIBERCEPT VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB FOR MACULAR EDEMA SECONDARY TO CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

PURPOSE

To compare the safety, efficacy, and frequency of intravitreal injection of aflibercept and bevacizumab for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative, randomized, interventional study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion were randomized between two groups according to the intravitreal injection used. Group A included eyes treated with intravitreal aflibercept, and Group B included eyes treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections. The inclusion criteria were macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion and follow-up duration of at least 12 months after the first injection. Exclusion criteria were macular ischemia, associated diabetes, hypertensive or renal retinopathy, other retinal disease, and previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection. The main outcome measures are central foveal thickness, best-corrected visual acuity, time intervals between injections, improved retinal nonperfusion, and any reported complication.

RESULTS

Group A included 39 patients with a mean age of 57.4 ± 8.2 years. Group B included 40 eyes with a mean age of 56.5 ± 9.1 years. Twelve months after the first injection, central foveal thickness significantly improved from 475.45 ± 71.05 m to 259.11 ± 20.67 m in Group A and from 460.22 ± 89.38 m to 264.29 ± 32.05 m in Group B; best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 0.81 ± 0.16 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/125) to 0.34 ± 0.14 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/40) in Group A and from 0.73 ± 0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/100) to 0.33 ± 0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/40) in Group B; the mean number of injections was 3.72 ± 2.93 in Group A and was 5.44 ± 2.85 in Group B (P < 0.05); and the mean interval between injections was 54.23 ± 8.47 days in Group A and was 35.12 ± 7.76 days in Group B (P < 0.05). Retinal nonperfusion improved in 9/12 eyes in Group A and in 3/8 eyes in Group B (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both aflibercept and bevacizumab are comparably effective for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion without significant complications. However, the burden of frequent intravitreal injections could be significantly reduced when using aflibercept.

Extended Injection Intervals after Switching from Ranibizumab to Aflibercept in Macular Edema due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To assess treatment interval extension after switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept intravitreal injections in macular edema (ME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with an insufficient response or frequent recurrences to initial treatment.

METHODS

CRVO eyes treated with ranibizumab injections on a treat-and-extend (TAE) basis with an insufficient response or frequent recurrences were switched to aflibercept. Primary endpoint was the change in injection intervals before and after the switch.

RESULTS

Eleven eyes were included in this retrospective bicentric study. Before switching, patients received a mean number of 15.3 ranibizumab injections (range, 6-34) during a mean follow-up of 23.4 months (range, 6-57). After switching to aflibercept, patients received a mean number of 12.4 injections (range, 6-20) during a mean follow-up of 25.5 months (range, 16-38). Treatment interval could be extended from 6.1 (range, 4-8) to 11 weeks (range, 8-16) (p=0.001) corresponding to a mean extension of injection interval of +4.9 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In case of insufficient response or frequent recurrences of ME due to CRVO in patients treated with ranibizumab on a TAE basis, switching to aflibercept could allow extending treatment intervals, which could reduce the injection burden for these patients.

Aflibercept Versus Bevacizumab and/or Ranibizumab for Recurrent Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To compare functional and anatomic outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept versus bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab in patients with recurrent macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

Retrospective, comparative case series of patients with recurrent ME in the setting of CRVO. Patients with recurrent ME received treatment with aflibercept (Group 1, G1) or bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab (Group 2, G2). Primary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT).

RESULTS

Of the 20 eyes (20 patients) with recurrent ME included in the study, 9 received aflibercept (G1) and 11 received bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab (G2). Median BCVA at recurrence of ME and at most recent follow-up was 20/60 (G1) and 20/80 (G2) and 20/40 (G1) and 20/50 (G2, P > 0.05 for all comparisons), respectively. Median CFT at recurrence of ME and at most recent follow-up was 492 μm (G1) and 448 μm (G2) and 291 μm (G1) and 295 μm (G2, P > 0.05 for all comparisons), respectively. Complete resolution of ME for at least 4 months was found in 78% (G1) and 55% (G2) of patients with a median injection free interval of 11 (G1) and 13 (G2) months (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent ME secondary to CRVO, there was improvement in BCVA and CFT in all groups, although patients treated with aflibercept showed a trend toward better anatomical outcomes decreased need for recurrent injections.

Outcomes of switching treatment to aflibercept in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion refractory to ranibizumab

PURPOSE

To assess the treatment outcome of switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept intravitreal injections in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

A prospective interventional study was conducted in a tertiary retina service in Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK, where patients with CRVO and associated macular oedema were recruited. First-line treatment involved three monthly ranibizumab injections. Non-responders were defined as patients who despite a minimum of three consecutive injections had persistent intraretinal fluid one month after the last injection. In these cases, a treatment change to aflibercept injections on a per-needed basis was decided. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured before and after switching of treatment. Follow-up period lasted for a minimum of 24 weeks after switching.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients with refractory macular oedema secondary to CRVO were included. All eyes had an average of 4.5 ranibizumab intravitreal injections in a mean period of 6 months without reduction in intraretinal fluid and/or no visual acuity gain. A significant decrease in mean CRT from 633.67 ± 242.42 to 234.62 ± 78.28 μm and improvement in mean BCVA from 1.34 ± 0.66 log MAR to 0.91 ± 0.73 log MAR were noticed after switching treatment to aflibercept. The average number of aflibercept injections needed for oedema resolution was 2.19.

CONCLUSIONS

Aflibercept is an effective alternative treatment for macular oedema secondary to CRVO refractory to ranibizumab. Good anatomical and functional result can be achieved with few injections. The maintenance of these results after 6 months is yet to be investigated.

Prolongation of injection interval after switching therapy from ranibizumab to aflibercept in Japanese patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to investigate the outcome of switching therapy from ranibizumab to aflibercept in Japanese patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in daily practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 15 eyes in 15 Japanese patients with ME secondary to BRVO who had been receiving a pro re nata regimen of ranibizumab and had provided written informed consent to switch to aflibercept therapy. The intravitreal injection interval, central retinal thickness, and visual acuity were evaluated before and after switching.

RESULTS

The mean period of ranibizumab treatment was 11.8±4.2 months. The mean observation period after switching to aflibercept was 10.6±3.4 months, and seven patients were observed for more than 12 months after switching. The mean intravitreal injection interval was prolonged by 23.6 days with aflibercept (68.2±26.4 days with ranibizumab vs 91.8±33.2 days with aflibercept; P=0.0011). The mean intravitreal injection interval just before the switch was 81.3±35.6 days and was significantly prolonged to 100.8±34.2 days just after the switch to aflibercept (P=0.0309). The mean central retinal thickness did not change before or after the switch to aflibercept (295±55 μm with ranibizumab vs 276±25 μm with aflibercept; P=0.12). The mean visual acuity also remained at an improved level after the switch. No systemic or ocular side effects were evident during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Switching therapy from ranibizumab to aflibercept in Japanese patients with ME secondary to BRVO prolonged the intravitreal injection interval without anatomical or functional degradation.