1
|
Dayto DC, Blonski W, Reljic T, Klocksieben F, Gill J, Gomez-Esquivel RD, Patel B, Taunk P, Sephien A, Thelin C, Kumar A. A systematic critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines of antithrombotic agents in gastrointestinal endoscopy using the AGREE II tool. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:818-825. [PMID: 38251803 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has not been systematically appraised. The goal of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of CPGs for the management of antithrombotic agents in periendoscopic period published within last 6 years. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify eligible CPGs published between January 1, 2016, and April 14, 2022, addressing the management of antithrombotic agents in the periendoscopic period. The quality of the CPG was independently assessed by six reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Domain scores were considered of sufficient quality when > 60% and of good quality when > 80%. RESULTS The search yielded 343 citations, of which seven CPGs published by the gastroenterology associations in Asia (n = 3), Europe (n = 2), and North America (n = 2) were included for the critical appraisal. The overall median score for the AGREE II domains was 93% (interquartile range [IQR] 11%) for scope and purpose, 79% (IQR 61%) for stakeholder involvement, 79% (IQR 36%) for rigor of development, 100% (IQR 14%) for clarity of presentation, 32% (IQR 36%) for applicability, 93% (IQR 29%) for editorial independence, and 86% (IQR 29%) for overall assessment. CONCLUSIONS The findings show that the overall methodological quality of the CPGs for the management of antithrombotic agents in the periendoscopic period varies across the domains. There is significant scope for improvement in the methodological rigor and applicability of CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denisse Camille Dayto
- HCA Healthcare/USF Morsani GME Consortium: HCA Florida Citrus Hospital, Inverness, Florida, USA
| | - Wojciech Blonski
- James A Haley Veterans Administration Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Tea Reljic
- Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Farina Klocksieben
- Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gill
- James A Haley Veterans Administration Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Rene D Gomez-Esquivel
- Morsani College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Brijesh Patel
- James A Haley Veterans Administration Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Pushpak Taunk
- Morsani College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Andrew Sephien
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Camille Thelin
- Morsani College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ambuj Kumar
- Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li J, Ou J, Liu Y, Shen C, Chen X, Li Y, Zhao J, Xu J, Zhang Y, Wang L. Assessment of the methodological, recommendation and reporting quality of global guidelines for neck pain and synthesis of evidence and recommendations: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075748. [PMID: 38508630 PMCID: PMC10953299 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neck pain is a global health problem that can cause severe disability and a huge medical burden. Clinical practice guideline (CPG) is an important basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment. A high-quality CPG plays a significant role in clinical practice. However, the quality of the CPGs for neck pain lacks comprehensive assessment. This protocol aims to evaluate the methodological, recommendation, reporting quality of global CPGs for neck pain and identify key recommendations and gaps that limit evidence-based practice. METHOD CPGs from January 2013 to November 2023 will be identified through a systematic search on 13 scientific databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, etc) and 7 online guideline repositories. Six reviewers will independently evaluate the quality of CPGs for neck pain by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare tools. Intraclass correlation coefficient will be used to test the consistency of the assessment. We will identify the distribution of evidence and recommendations in each evidence-based CPGs for neck pain and regrade the level of evidence and strength of recommendations by adopting the commonly used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations system. The key recommendations based on high-quality evidence will be summarised. In addition, we will categorise CPGs by different characteristics and conduct a subgroup analysis of the results of assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No subjects will be involved in this systematic review, so there is no need for ethical approval. The finding of this review will be summarised as a paper for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023417717.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayu Li
- South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiayin Ou
- Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Liu
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chenwei Shen
- South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoli Chen
- Guangzhou Huanan Business College, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Li
- Clinical Medical College of Acupuncture Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiayi Zhao
- South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing Xu
- South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Lin Wang
- South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gaspar PC, Barreto JOM, Bigolin A, Miranda AE, Aires Júnior LF, Bazzo ML, Díaz Bermúdez XP, Benzaken AS. Brazilian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sexually Transmitted Infections That Cause Urethral Discharge: Assessment According to the AGREE II and Critical Analysis Based on the WHO Recommendations. Sex Transm Dis 2023; 50:804-809. [PMID: 37824264 DOI: 10.1097/olq.0000000000001873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sexually transmitted infections (STI) can have severe consequences. In Brazil, case management is recommended by the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutical Guidelines for Comprehensive Care for People with STIs (PCDT-IST). This study assessed the quality of PCDT-IST (2021) and reviewed the main recommendations for the management of STI that cause urethral discharge compared with the World Health Organization (WHO) STI Guidelines. METHODS The PCDT-IST (2021) quality was independently assessed by 4 appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation instrument, version II (AGREE II). The PCDT-IST (2021) and the WHO Guidelines for the Management of Symptomatic STI (2021) were compared considering 14 different assessment domains. RESULTS The PCDT-IST (2021) scores in the AGREE II domains were: Rigor of Development (58%), Applicability (35%), Editorial Independence (38%), Scope and Purpose (78%), Stakeholder Involvement (74%), and Clarity and Presentation (82%). The overall score was 67%, and all appraisers recommended the Brazilian guideline. Regarding the PCDT-IST (2021) and the WHO STI Guidelines (2021) comparation, 10 domains would be relevant for further reviewing the Brazilian recommendations: Diagnostic tests; Etiological approach; Treatment for recurrent urethral discharge; Treatment for urethritis without etiological agent identification; Treatment for gonococcal urethritis; Treatment for chlamydial urethritis; Retreatment for gonococcal infections; Treatment for Mycoplasma genitalium urethritis; Treatment for Trichomonas vaginalis urethritis; 10. Flowcharts. CONCLUSIONS The PCDT-IST (2021) has a reasonable degree of quality. However, the domains of Applicability, Rigor of Development, and Editorial Independence must be better ensured. The guidelines comparison will help to select key topics that should be addressed with priority in the following national STI guidelines updates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alisson Bigolin
- Departamento de HIV/AIDS, Tuberculose, Hepatites Virais e Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis (Dathi) do Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil
| | | | - Luiz F Aires Júnior
- Departamento de HIV/AIDS, Tuberculose, Hepatites Virais e Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis (Dathi) do Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil
| | - Maria Luiza Bazzo
- Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, Microbiologia e Sorologia (LBMMS) do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmácia da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
| | - Ximena Pamela Díaz Bermúdez
- From the Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva da Universidade de Brasília (UNB), Brasília, DF, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alameddine S, Capannolo G, Rizzo G, Khalil A, Di Girolamo R, Iacovella C, Liberati M, Patrizi L, Acharya G, Odibo AO, D'Antonio F. A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction. J Perinat Med 2023; 51:970-980. [PMID: 36976902 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To systematically identify and critically assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on management fetal growth restriction (FGR). CONTENT Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus and ISI Web of Science databases were searched to identify all relevant CPGs on FGR. SUMMARY Diagnostic criteria of FGR, recommended growth charts, recommendation for detailed anatomical assessment and invasive testing, frequency of fetal growth scans, fetal monitoring, hospital admission, drugs administrations, timing at delivery, induction of labor, postnatal assessment and placental histopathological were assessed. Quality assessment was evaluated by AGREE II tool. Twelve CPGs were included. Twenty-five percent (3/12) of CPS adopted the recently published Delphi consensus, 58.3% (7/12) an estimated fetal weight (EFW)/abdominal circumference (AC) EFW/AC <10th percentile, 8.3% (1/12) an EFW/AC <5th percentile while one CPG defined FGR as an arrest of growth or a shift in its rate measured longitudinally. Fifty percent (6/12) of CPGs recommended the use of customized growth charts to assess fetal growth. Regarding the frequency of Doppler assessment, in case of absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery 8.3% (1/12) CPGs recommended assessment every 24-48, 16.7% (2/12) every 48-72 h, 1 CPG generically recommended assessment 1-2 times per week, while 25 (3/12) did not specifically report the frequency of assessment. Only 3 CPGs reported recommendation on the type of Induction of Labor to adopt. The AGREE II standardized domain scores for the first overall assessment (OA1) had a mean of 50%. OUTLOOK There is significant heterogeneity in the management of pregnancies complicated by FGR in published CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Alameddine
- Center for High-Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giulia Capannolo
- Center for High-Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rizzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata Università Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
| | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Saint George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Raffaella Di Girolamo
- Center for High-Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Marco Liberati
- Center for High-Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Lodovico Patrizi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata Università Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
| | - Ganesh Acharya
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anthony O Odibo
- Divisions of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Francesco D'Antonio
- Center for High-Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sephien A, Dayto DC, Reljic T, Blonski W, Nerella N, Prida X, Kumar A. A Systematic Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Heart Failure Using the AGREE II Tool. Am J Cardiol 2023; 202:192-198. [PMID: 37451063 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for heart failure management have been published to provide the best practices regarding the use of foundational therapies to reduce morbidity and mortality in this patient population. However, a critical appraisal of these heart failure guidelines has not been performed. This systematic review aimed to assess the methodological quality of current CPGs in the management of patients with heart failure. A comprehensive search of EMBASE and PubMed was conducted to identify CPGs published between January 1, 2021 and September 8, 2022. Any CPGs published in the last 2 years addressing the management of heart failure were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluate II) instrument. The initial search yielded 3,269 citations, of which, 6 CPGs were included. A total of 2 CPGs were each published by the cardiology associations in North America and Asia and 1 each in Europe and South America. The overall median score for the AGREE II domains were 100% for scope and purpose, 71% for stakeholder involvement, 71% for the rigor of development, 100% for clarity of presentation, 43% for applicability, 100% for editorial independence, and 64% for overall assessment. CPG developers would benefit from the use of a standardized approach to the development of CPGs and use the contents of the AGREE II tool to improve the methodological rigor, reporting, and applicability of CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Sephien
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| | - Denisse Camille Dayto
- Department of Internal Medicine, HCA Healthcare/USF Morsani GME Consortium: HCA Florida Citrus Hospital, Inverness, Florida
| | - Tea Reljic
- Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Wojciech Blonski
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Nishant Nerella
- Department of Internal Medicine, HCA Healthcare/USF Morsani GME Consortium: HCA Florida Citrus Hospital, Inverness, Florida; Citrus Cardiology, Inverness, Florida
| | - Xavier Prida
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ambuj Kumar
- Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Luo J, Chen Z, Liu D, Li H, He S, Zeng L, Yang M, Liu Z, Xiao X, Zhang L. Methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 living systematic review: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:175. [PMID: 37525117 PMCID: PMC10388517 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01980-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this study is to evaluate the methodological quality and reporting quality of living systematic reviews (LSRs) on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while the secondary objective is to investigate potential factors that may influence the overall quality of COVID-19 LSRs. METHODS Six representative databases, including Medline, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Cochrane Library, China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and China Science, Technology Journal Database (VIP) were systematically searched for COVID-19 LSRs. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and then assessed the methodological and reporting quality of COVID-19 LSRs using the "A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2" (AMSTAR-2) tool and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) 2020 statement, respectively. Univariate linear regression and multivariate linear regression were used to explore eight potential factors that might affect the methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 LSRs. RESULTS A total of 64 COVID-19 LSRs were included. The AMSTAR-2 evaluation results revealed that the number of "yes" responses for each COVID-19 LSR was 13 ± 2.68 (mean ± standard deviation). Among them, 21.9% COVID-19 LSRs were rated as "high", 4.7% as "moderate", 23.4% as "low", and 50% as "critically low". The evaluation results of the PRISMA 2020 statement showed that the sections with poor adherence were methods, results and other information. The number of "yes" responses for each COVID-19 LSR was 21 ± 4.18 (mean ± standard deviation). The number of included studies and registration are associated with better methodological quality; the number of included studies and funding are associated with better reporting quality. CONCLUSIONS Improvement is needed in the methodological and reporting quality of COVID-19 LSRs. Researchers conducting COVID-19 LSRs should take note of the quality-related factors identified in this study to generate evidence-based evidence of higher quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiefeng Luo
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhe Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Dan Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hailong Li
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Siyi He
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Linan Zeng
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mengting Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xue Xiao
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Lingli Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research On Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China.
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hatakeyama Y, Seto K, Onishi R, Hirata K, Matsumoto K, Wu Y, Hasegawa T. Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e063639. [PMID: 37188477 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the involvement of methodological experts improves the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) after adjusting for other factors. SETTING The quality of Japanese CPGs published in 2011-2019 was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. A questionnaire survey targeting CPG development groups was conducted through postal mail. PARTICIPANTS 405 CPGs were retrieved from a Japanese CPG clearinghouse. Questionnaires were distributed to the 405 CPG development groups. Of the 178 respondents, 22 were excluded because of missing values. Finally, 156 participants representing their CPG development groups were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES CPG quality was assessed using the AGREE II tool. The characteristics of CPGs, including publication year, development organisation, versions, number of members in the development group and involvement of methodological experts, were corrected from the description in the CPGs and the questionnaire survey. We performed multiple logistic regressions using the quality of CPGs as the dependent variable and the involvement of experts as the independent variable, adjusting for other possible factors. RESULTS A total of 156 CPGs were included. Expert involvement was significantly associated with the AGREE II instrument scores in domains 1 (β=0.207), 2 (β=0.370), 3 (β=0.413), 4 (β=0.289), 5 (β=0.375), 6 (β=0.240) and overall (β=0.344). CONCLUSION This study revealed that the involvement of methodological experts in the CPG development process improves the quality of CPGs. The results suggest the importance of establishing a training and certification programme for experts and constructing expert referral systems that meet CPG developers' needs to improve the quality of CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kanako Seto
- School of Medicine, Toho University, Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Onishi
- School of Medicine, Toho University, Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koki Hirata
- School of Medicine, Toho University, Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yinghui Wu
- School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brody S, Loree S, Sampson M, Mensinkai S, Coffman J, Mueller MH, Askin N, Hamill C, Wilson E, McAteer MB, Staines H. Searching for evidence in public health emergencies: a white paper of best practices. J Med Libr Assoc 2023; 111:566-578. [PMID: 37312802 PMCID: PMC10259619 DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Information professionals have supported medical providers, administrators and decision-makers, and guideline creators in the COVID-19 response. Searching COVID-19 literature presented new challenges, including the volume and heterogeneity of literature and the proliferation of new information sources, and exposed existing issues in metadata and publishing. An expert panel developed best practices, including recommendations, elaborations, and examples, for searching during public health emergencies. Methods Project directors and advisors developed core elements from experience and literature. Experts, identified by affiliation with evidence synthesis groups, COVID-19 search experience, and nomination, responded to an online survey to reach consensus on core elements. Expert participants provided written responses to guiding questions. A synthesis of responses provided the foundation for focus group discussions. A writing group then drafted the best practices into a statement. Experts reviewed the statement prior to dissemination. Results Twelve information professionals contributed to best practice recommendations on six elements: core resources, search strategies, publication types, transparency and reproducibility, collaboration, and conducting research. Underlying principles across recommendations include timeliness, openness, balance, preparedness, and responsiveness. Conclusions The authors and experts anticipate the recommendations for searching for evidence during public health emergencies will help information specialists, librarians, evidence synthesis groups, researchers, and decision-makers respond to future public health emergencies, including but not limited to disease outbreaks. The recommendations complement existing guidance by addressing concerns specific to emergency response. The statement is intended as a living document. Future revisions should solicit input from a broader community and reflect conclusions of meta-research on COVID-19 and health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Brody
- , Reference & Instruction Librarian, Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sara Loree
- , Medical Library Manager, St. Luke's Health System, ID, United States
| | - Margaret Sampson
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer Coffman
- , Science and Engineering Research Librarian, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | | | - Nicole Askin
- , WRHA Virtual Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Cheryl Hamill
- , South and East Metropolitan Health Services, Perth, Australia
| | - Emma Wilson
- , The University of Edinburgh, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Mary Beth McAteer
- , Virginia Mason Medical Center, Jones Learning Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Best Practices for Searching During Public Health Emergencies Working Group
- Cheryl Hamill, FALIA, AALIA (CP) Health, , 0000-0002-6069-1806, South and East Metropolitan Health Services, Perth, Australia; Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD, 0000-0002-1968-6765, McMaster University, Canada; Amy M Claussen, MLIS, 0000-0003-3996-1055, University of Minnesota, United States; Kavita Umesh Kothari, MPH, 0000-0002-0759-5225, Health Information Consultant, Kobe, Japan; Caroline De Brún, PhD, 0000-0002-5185-0043, UK Health Security Agency, United Kingdom; Sarah Young, 0000-0002-8301-5106, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Sarah E Neil-Sztramko, PhD, 0000-0002-9600-3403, McMaster University, Canada; Shaila Mensinkai, MA, MLIS, Librarian Reserve Corps, Canada; Emma Wilson, 0000-0002-8100-7508, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland; Robin M Featherstone MLIS, 0000-0003-2517-2258, CADTH Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (present affiliation); Cochrane Central Executive Team (sponsor), Toronto, Canada; Margaret Sampson, MLIS, PhD, AHIP, 0000-0003-2550-9893, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Canada; Heather Staines, PhD, MA, 0000-0003-3876-1182, Delta Think, United States; Martha Knuth, MLIS, 0000-0003-4264-1642, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oliver E, Navaratnam K, Gent J, Khalil A, Sharp A. Comparison of International Guidelines on the Management of Twin Pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 285:97-104. [PMID: 37087836 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review current international clinical guidelines on the antenatal and intrapartum management of twin pregnancies, examining areas of consensus and conflict. METHODS We conducted a database search using Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL and ERCI Guidelines website. Guidelines were screened for eligibility using our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those deemed eligible were quality assessed using the AGREE II tool and relevant data was extracted. RESULTS We identified 21 relevant guidelines from 16 countries including two international society guidelines. There was consensus in determination of chorionicity and amnionicity within the first trimester, fetal anomaly scan between 18 and 22 weeks and the recommended screening for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). For those that provided intrapartum guidance, there was agreement in recommending caesarean section to deliver monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twins, epidural anaesthesia for intrapartum analgesia and the use of cardiotocography (CTG) for intrapartum fetal monitoring. The main areas of conflict included cervical length screening, frequency of ultrasound surveillance, timing of delivery of dichorionic twin pregnancies and circumstances for recommending vaginal delivery. There was a lack of advice on intrapartum management. CONCLUSIONS This review has highlighted the need for unified international guidance on the management of twin pregnancy. Comparisons of current guidance demonstrates a lack of confidence in the management of labour in twin pregnancies. Further evidence on intrapartum care of twin pregnancies is needed to inform practice guidelines and improve both short and long term maternal and fetal outcomes.
Collapse
|
10
|
Capannolo G, D'Amico A, Alameddine S, Di Girolamo R, Khalil A, Calì G, Trish IT, Coutinho CM, Herrera M, Liberati M, Lucidi A, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Buca D, D'Antonio F. Placenta accreta spectrum disorders clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023; 49:1313-1321. [PMID: 36796351 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To objectively assess the quality of the published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the management of pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)disorders. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases were searched. The following aspects related to the management of pregnancies with suspected PAS disorders were evaluated: risk factors for PAS, prenatal diagnosis, role of interventional radiology and ureteral stenting, and optimal surgical management. The assessment of risk of bias and quality assessment of the CPGs were performed using the (AGREE II) tool (Brouwers et al., 2010). To define a CPG as of good quality we adopted a cut-off score >60%. RESULTS Nine CPGs were included. Specific risk factors for referral were assessed by 44.4% (4/9) of CPGs, mainly consisting in the presence of placenta previa and a prior cesarean delivery or uterine surgery. About 55.6% of CPGs (5/9) suggested ultrasound assessment of women with risk factors for PAS in the second and third trimester of pregnancy and 33.3% (3/9) recommended magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 88.9% (8/9) of CPGs recommended cesarean delivery at 34-37 weeks of gestation. There was not generally consensus on the use of interventional radiology and ureteral stenting before surgery for PAS. Finally, hysterectomy was the recommend surgical approach by 77.8% (7/9) of the included CPGs. CONCLUSION Most of the published CPGs on PAS are generally of good quality. There was general agreement among the different CPGs on PAS as a regard as risk stratification, timing at diagnosis and delivery but not on the indication for MRI, use of interventional radiology and ureteral stenting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Capannolo
- Centre for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Alice D'Amico
- Centre for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Sara Alameddine
- Centre for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Raffaella Di Girolamo
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Federico II, University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Saint George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Calì
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arnas Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ilan T Trish
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Conrado M Coutinho
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo: Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mauricio Herrera
- Maternal fetal medicine, Obstetric Department, Clinica Colsanitas Bogotà, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Marco Liberati
- Centre for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Alessandro Lucidi
- Centre for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Danilo Buca
- Centre for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco D'Antonio
- Centre for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kok-Pigge AC, Greving JP, de Groot JF, Oerbekke M, Kuijpers T, Burgers JS. A Delphi consensus checklist helped assess the need to develop rapid guideline recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 156:1-10. [PMID: 36764465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We aimed to develop a checklist to aid guideline developers in determining which scientific or societal cause ("triggers") are relevant when considering to initiate a rapid recommendation procedure. METHODS We conducted a two-round modified Delphi procedure with a panel of Dutch guideline experts, clinicians, and patient representatives. A previously conducted systematic literature review and semistructured interviews with four science journalists were used to generate a list of potential items. This item list was submitted to the panel for discussion, reduction and refinement into a checklist. RESULTS Thirteen experts took part. Two questionnaires were completed in which participants scored an initial list of 64 items based on relevance. During two online meetings, the scores were discussed, irrelevant items were removed, and relevant items were reformulated into seven questions. The final "quickscan assessment of the need for a rapid recommendation" covers user perspective, scientific evidence, clinical relevance, clinical practice variation, applicability, quality of care and public health outcomes, and ethical/legal considerations. CONCLUSION The quickscan aids guideline developers in systematically assessing whether a trigger expresses a valid need for developing a rapid recommendation. Future research could focus on the applicability and validity of the checklist within guideline development programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee Claire Kok-Pigge
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Domus Medica, Mercatorlaan 1200, 3528 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jacoba P Greving
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Domus Medica, Mercatorlaan 1200, 3528 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Janke F de Groot
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Domus Medica, Mercatorlaan 1200, 3528 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Oerbekke
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Domus Medica, Mercatorlaan 1200, 3528 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ton Kuijpers
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Domus Medica, Mercatorlaan 1200, 3528 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jako S Burgers
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Domus Medica, Mercatorlaan 1200, 3528 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Di Girolamo R, Khalil A, Rizzo G, Capannolo G, Buca D, Liberati M, Acharya G, Odibo AO, D'Antonio F. Systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022; 4:100654. [PMID: 35504493 PMCID: PMC9057927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically identify and critically assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines for the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy. DATA SOURCES Medline, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases were searched until February 15, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Inclusion criteria were clinical practice guidelines on the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy. The risk of bias and quality assessments of the included clinical practice guidelines were performed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation II tool, which is considered the gold standard for quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines. To define a clinical practice guideline as of good quality, we adopted the cutoff score proposed by Amer et al: if the overall clinical practice guideline score was >60%, it was recommended. METHODS The following clinical points related to the management of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were addressed: criteria for maternal hospitalization, recommendations for follow-up fetal growth scan, specific recommendations against invasive procedures, management of labor, timing of delivery, postpartum care, and vaccination strategy. RESULTS A total of 28 clinical practice guidelines were included. All recommended hospitalization only for severe disease; 46.1% (6/13) suggested a fetal growth scan after SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas 23.1% (3/13) did not support this practice. Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin was recommended in symptomatic women by 77.1% (7/9) of the clinical practice guidelines. None of the guidelines recommended administering corticosteroids only for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in preterm gestation, unless specific obstetrical indication exists. Elective induction of labor from 39 weeks of gestation was suggested by 18.1% (2/11) of the clinical practice guidelines included in the present review, whereas 45.4% (5/11) did not recommend elective induction unless other obstetrical indications coexisted. There were 27% (3/11) of clinical practice guidelines that suggested shortening of the second stage of labor, and active pushing was supported by 18.1% (2/11). There was general agreement among the clinical practice guidelines in not recommending cesarean delivery only for the presence of maternal infection and in recommending vaccine boosters at least 6 months after the primary series of vaccination. The Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation II standardized domain scores for the first overall assessment of clinical practice guidelines had a mean of 50% (standard deviation±21.82%), and 9 clinical practice guidelines scored >60%. CONCLUSION A significant heterogeneity was found in some of the main aspects of the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, as reported by the published clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella Di Girolamo
- Center for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy (Dr. Di Girolamo, Dr. Capannolo, Dr. Buca, Prof. Liberati, and Prof. D'Antonio)
| | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom (Prof. Khalil)
| | - Giuseppe Rizzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università degli studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy (Prof. Rizzo)
| | - Giulia Capannolo
- Center for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy (Dr. Di Girolamo, Dr. Capannolo, Dr. Buca, Prof. Liberati, and Prof. D'Antonio)
| | - Danilo Buca
- Center for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy (Dr. Di Girolamo, Dr. Capannolo, Dr. Buca, Prof. Liberati, and Prof. D'Antonio)
| | - Marco Liberati
- Center for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy (Dr. Di Girolamo, Dr. Capannolo, Dr. Buca, Prof. Liberati, and Prof. D'Antonio)
| | - Ganesh Acharya
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute and Center for Fetal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (Prof. Acharya); Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway (Prof. Acharya); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway (Prof. Acharya)
| | - Anthony O Odibo
- Divisions of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (Prof. Odibo)
| | - Francesco D'Antonio
- Center for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy (Dr. Di Girolamo, Dr. Capannolo, Dr. Buca, Prof. Liberati, and Prof. D'Antonio).
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen Z, Luo J, Li S, Xu P, Zeng L, Yu Q, Zhang L. Characteristics of Living Systematic Review for COVID-19. Clin Epidemiol 2022; 14:925-935. [PMID: 35958161 PMCID: PMC9359410 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s367339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The systematic review aims to analyze and summarize the characteristics of living systematic review (LSR) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods Six databases including Medline, Excerpta Medica (Embase), Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database and China Science, and Technology Journal Database (VIP), were searched as the source of basic information and methodology of LSR. Descriptive analytical methods were used to analyze the included COVID-19 LSRs, and the study characteristics of COVID-19 LSRs were further assessed. Results Sixty-four COVID-19 LSRs were included. Eighty-nine point one percent of LSRs were published on Science Citation Index (SCI) journals, and 64.1% publication with an impact factor (IF) >5 and 17.2% with an IF >15 among SCI journals. The first unit of the published LSRs for COVID-19 came from 19 countries, with the largest contribution from the UK (17.2%, 11/64). Forty point six percent of LSRs for COVID-19 were related to therapeutics topic which was considered the most concerned perspective for LSRs for COVID-19. Seventy-six point six percent of LSRs focused on the general population, with less attention to children, pregnant women and the elderly. However, the LSR for COVID-19 was reported incomplete on “living” process, including 40.6% of studies without search frequency, 79.7% of studies without screening frequency, 20.3% of studies without update frequency, and 65.6% of studies without the timing or criteria of transitioning LSR out of living mode. Conclusion Although researchers in many countries have applied LSRs to COVID-19, most of the LSRs for COVID-19 were incomplete in reporting on the “living” process and less focused on special populations. This could reduce the confidence of health-care providers and policy makers in the results of COVID-19 LSR, thereby hindering the translation of evidence on COVID-19 LSR into clinical practice. It was necessary to explicitly enact preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) to improve the reporting quality of LSR and support ongoing efforts of therapeutics research for special patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products in Vitro and in Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiefeng Luo
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products in Vitro and in Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Siyu Li
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products in Vitro and in Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Peipei Xu
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products in Vitro and in Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Linan Zeng
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products in Vitro and in Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qin Yu
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- National Drug Clinical Trial Institute, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Qin Yu, Email
| | - Lingli Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products in Vitro and in Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Lingli Zhang, Email
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tovey D, Tugwell P. Editors' Choice: February 2022. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 142:A6-A7. [PMID: 35210058 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
15
|
Amer YS, Shaiba LA, Hadid A, Anabrees J, Almehery A, AAssiri M, Alnemri A, Darwish ARA, Baqawi B, Aboshaiqah A, Hneiny L, Almaghrabi RH, El-Malky AM, Al-Dajani NM. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:891572. [PMID: 36052365 PMCID: PMC9424847 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.891572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Neonatal sepsis (NS) continues to be a critical healthcare priority for the coming decades worldwide. The aim of this study was to critically appraise the quality of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for neonatal sepsis and to summarize and compare their recommendations. METHODS This study involves a systematic review of CPGs. We identified clinical questions and eligibility criteria and searched and screened for CPGs using bibliographic and CPG databases and professional societies. Each included CPG was assessed by four independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. We summarized the recommendations in a comparison practical table. The systematic review was drafted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Its protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42021258732). RESULTS Our search retrieved 4,432 citations; of which five CPGs were eligible and appraised: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP 2018) (35 and 34 weeks); Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS 2017); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2021); and Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Services (QH 2020). Among these, the overall assessment of two evidence-based CPGs scored > 70% (NICE and QH), which was consistent with their higher scores in the six domains of the AGREE II instrument. In domain 3 (rigor of development), NICE and QH scored 99 and 60%, respectively. In domain 5 (applicability), they scored 96 and 74%, respectively, and in domain 6 (editorial independence), they scored 90 and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION The methodological quality of the NICE CPG was superior followed by the QH CPG with relevant recommendations for use in practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021258732, PROSPERO (CRD42021258732).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser S Amer
- Pediatrics Department, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality Research Unit, Quality Management Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Research Chair for Evidence-Based Health Care and Knowledge Translation, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Alexandria Center for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.,Adaptation Working Group, Guidelines International Network, Perth, Scotland
| | - Lana A Shaiba
- Pediatrics Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adnan Hadid
- Pediatrics Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jasim Anabrees
- Pediatrics Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Saudi Neonatology Society (SNS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Manal AAssiri
- Neonatology Department, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of Health, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Alnemri
- Pediatrics Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Saudi Neonatology Society (SNS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amira R Al Darwish
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Pharmacy Services, Second Health Cluster in Central Region, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Pharmacy Department, King Fahad Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Badi Baqawi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Fahad Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Layal Hneiny
- Saab Medical Library, University Libraries, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.,Wegner Health Sciences Library, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | - Rana H Almaghrabi
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed M El-Malky
- Morbidity and Mortality Unit, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Public Health and Community Medicine Department, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Academy of Scientific Research, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Nawaf M Al-Dajani
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Infectious Diseases Unit, Pediatrics Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|