Simultaneous auricular reconstruction and transcutaneous bone conduction device implantation in patients with microtia

Update on Total Auricular Construction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand principles of preoperative planning for microtia repair. 2. Understand key techniques for flap design, skin envelope dissection, framework creation, and donor-site reconstruction. 3. Describe important components of postoperative management.

SUMMARY

Total auricular construction remains a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. This article describes current surgical strategies and advancements for microtia construction. The authors' focus is to describe the several keys for success that are useful for young surgeons who wish to train themselves to create satisfactory results.

Reconstructive Techniques in Pediatric Congenital Microtia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Autografts and allografts are commonly used in microtia reconstruction. We aimed to systematically review and compare these reconstructive materials in pediatric congenital microtia reconstruction. A systematic review of the literature was performed. MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched for original studies on congenital microtia reconstruction in pediatric patients since database inception to 2021. Microtia grade was stratified as high or low. Meta-analysis of pooled proportions and continuous variables was performed using inverse variance weighting with a random effects model to compare between the autograft and allograft groups. Sixty-eight studies with a total of 5,546 patients used autografts (n = 5,382) or alloplastic implants (n = 164). Four other studies used prosthesis, cadaveric homografts, or tissue engineering. The allograft group was on average younger than the autograft group (8.4 vs. 11.1 years). There were no syndromic patients in the allograft group, compared to 43% in the autograft group. Patients treated with allografts had higher microtia grade than those treated with autograft (98 vs. 72%). Autografts were more commonly utilized by plastic surgeons and allografts by otolaryngologists (95 vs. 38%). No autografts and 41% of allografts were done concurrently with atresiaplasty or bone conduction implant. Satisfaction rates were similarly high (>90%) with similar complication rates (<10%). Microtia reconstruction using autografts and allografts had similar satisfaction and complication rates. Allografts were preferred for younger patients and concurrent hearing restoration. Further large-scale studies are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of these reconstructive techniques.

Implantable hearing devices in clinical practice. Systematic review and consensus statements

Objective

Implantable hearing devices represent a modern and innovative solution for hearing restoration. Over the years, these high-tech devices have increasingly evolved but their use in clinical practice is not universally agreed in the scientific literature. Congresses, meetings, conferences, and consensus statements to achieve international agreement have been made. This work follows this line and aims to answer unsolved questions regarding examinations, selection criteria and surgery for implantable hearing devices.

Materials and methods

A Consensus Working Group was established by the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology. A method group performed a systematic review for each single question to identify the current best evidence on the topic and to guide a multidisciplinary panel in developing the statements.

Results

Twenty-nine consensus statements were approved by the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology. These were associated with 4 key area subtopics regarding pre-operative tests, otological, audiological and surgical indications.

Conclusions

This consensus can be considered a further step forward to establish realistic guidelines on the debated topic of implantable hearing devices.

Individual computer-assisted 3D planning for placement of auricular prosthesis anchors in combination with an implantable transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device in patients with aural atresia

BACKGROUND

The simultaneous implantation of the Bonebridge (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), a semi-implantable active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device and anchors for auricular prostheses can be challenging as both implants contain magnets and compete for the narrow space in the designated implantation area.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A preoperative planning tool (virtual surgery) was used with individual 3D computer models of the skull and implants for finding optimal implant positions for both the floating mass transducer (FMT) and the anchors for the auricular prosthesis. The interaction between the magnetic prosthesis anchors and the FMT was measured by means of static magnetic forces. A retrospective data analysis was conducted to evaluate the surgical and audiological outcome.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2021, a 3D planning of a simultaneous implantation of the Bonebridge with auricular prosthesis anchors was conducted on 6 ears of 5 patients (3 males, 2 females; age range 17-56 years). The individual preoperative planning was considered very useful for the optimal placement of bone anchors in combination with the Bonebridge. Audiological data showed a clear benefit for hearing 3 months and > 11 months after implantation. No adverse interactions between the magnetic prosthesis anchors and the FMT were observed. In two patients, revision surgery was carried out due to skin inflammation or wound healing problems. No long-term complications were observed 3-5 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative 3D planning represents a clear benefit for the simultaneous audiological and esthetic rehabilitation using the Bonebridge and anchors for auricular prostheses.

Dual Option Microtia Clinic: A Comparison of Outcomes in Microtia Reconstruction Using Autologous Rib or Porous Polyethylene Implant

Introduction: Auricular reconstruction techniques most frequently utilize either autologous costal cartilage or alloplastic porous polyethylene (PPE) implant. Objectives: To compare the aesthetic outcomes, number of surgeries, and complications in children who underwent microtia reconstruction with either rib or PPE implant by blinded photograph review. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive pediatric patients who underwent auricular reconstruction with either autologous cartilage or PPE between November 2017 and February 2022. Blinded observers rated each postoperative ear through a web-based survey. Data on patient characteristics, operative time, length of admission, and complications were collected, bivariate analyses were performed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Results: Forty-four ears were included, 28 of which (63.6%) were reconstructed with cartilage. Median patient age was 8 years (range 4-18 years) and 29 (65.9%) were male. The cartilage group had more surgeries (median 2.5 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001), and total operating time across all surgeries did not differ significantly. Conclusion: The two groups in our study had similar rates of complications and aesthetic scores, and aesthetic scores were worse for ears with wound complications requiring unplanned revisions.

Multicentric study on surgical information and early safety and performance results with the Bonebridge BCI 602: an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant

AIM

This European multicentric study aimed to prove safety and performance of the Bonebridge BCI 602 in children and adults suffering from either conductive hearing loss (CHL), mixed hearing loss (MHL), or single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD).

METHODS

33 patients (13 adults and 10 children with either CHL or MHL and 10 patients with SSD) in three study groups were included. Patients were their own controls (single-subject repeated measures), comparing the unaided or pre-operative to the 3-month post-operative outcomes. Performance was evaluated by sound field thresholds (SF), word recognition scores (WRS) and/or speech reception thresholds in quiet (SRT) and in noise (SNR). Safety was demonstrated with a device-specific surgical questionnaire, adverse event reporting and stable pure-tone measurements.

RESULTS

The Bonebridge BCI 602 significantly improved SF thresholds (+ 25.5 dB CHL/MHL/SSD), speech intelligibility in WRS (+ 68.0% CHL/MHL) and SRT in quiet (- 16.5 dB C/MHL) and in noise (- 3.51 dB SNR SSD). Air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC) thresholds remained stable over time. All adverse events were resolved, with none unanticipated. Mean audio processor wearing times in hours [h] per day for the CHL/MHL group were ~ 13 h for adults, ~ 11 h for paediatrics and ~ 6 h for the SSD group. The average surgical length was 57 min for the CHL/MHL group and 42 min for the SSD group. The versatility of the BCI 602 (reduced drilling depth and ability to bend the transition for optimal placement) allows for treatment of normal, pre-operated and malformed anatomies. All audiological endpoints were reached.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bonebridge BCI 602 significantly improved hearing thresholds and speech understanding. Since implant placement follows the patient's anatomy instead of the shape of the device and the duration of surgery is shorter than with its predecessor, implantation is easier with the BCI 602. Performance and safety were proven for adults and children as well as for the CHL/MHL and SSD indications 3 months post-operatively.

[Individual computer-assisted 3D planning for placement of auricular prosthesis anchors in combination with an implantable transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device in patients with aural atresia. German version]

BACKGROUND

The simultaneous implantation of the Bonebridge (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), a semi-implantable active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device and anchors for auricular prostheses can be challenging as both implants contain magnets and compete for the narrow space in the designated implantation area.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A preoperative planning tool (virtual surgery) was used with individual 3D computer models of the skull and implants for finding optimal implant positions for both the floating mass transducer (FMT) and the anchors for the auricular prosthesis. The interaction between the magnetic prosthesis anchors and the FMT was measured by means of static magnetic forces. A retrospective data analysis was conducted to evaluate the surgical and audiological outcome.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2021 a 3D planning of a simultaneous implantation of the Bonebridge with auricular prosthesis anchors was conducted on 6 ears of 5 patients (3 males, 2 females; age range 17-56 years). The individual preoperative planning was considered very useful for the optimal placement of bone anchors in combination with the Bonebridge. Audiological data showed a clear benefit for hearing 3 months and > 11 months after implantation. No adverse interactions between the magnetic prosthesis anchors and the FMT were observed. In two patients, revision surgery was carried out due to skin inflammation or wound healing problems. No long-term complications were observed 3-5 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative 3D planning represents a clear benefit for the simultaneous audiological and esthetic rehabilitation using the Bonebridge and anchors for auricular prostheses.

Total auricular reconstruction concomitant with BONEBRIDGE implantation using a retrosigmoid sinus approach

BACKGROUND

Retrosigmoid sinus (RS) approach was not the dominant choice for BONEBRIDGE implantation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of auricular reconstruction concomitant with BONEBRIDGE implantation using retrosigmoid approach for aural atresia patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 15 children (28 ears) who underwent auricular reconstruction using a completely expanded postauricular flap with a skin expander concomitant with retrosigmoid BONEBRIDGE implantation from July 2019 to September 2020.

RESULTS

All 15 patients healed well and had no bone conduction shift. Average SFT improvement was 27.1 dB HL (p < .001). Comparison between aided and unaided speech recognition rate in quiet and in noise showed significant improvements, respectively (p < .001). After a follow-up of 21-35 months, the hearing results were stable and the aesthetic outcomes were satisfying.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

For patients who undergo auricle reconstruction using expanded postauricular flap, retrosigmoid approach can avoid interfering the flap of reconstructed auricular without increasing the surgical risk or impact the clinical efficacy, and without significantly prolonging the total anesthesia time. The integrated surgical approach is a safe, and convenient option for patients who require simultaneous auricular reconstruction with BONEBRIDGE implantation.

Systematic Review of Medpor Versus Autologous Ear Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

Ear reconstruction is 1 of the most technically challenging sub-specialties of craniofacial and reconstructive plastic surgery. The reconstructive ear must not only fulfil the requirement of being aesthetically pleasing but must also have good vascularity with a low complication rate. Several ear reconstructive techniques have been developed such as the autologous ear reconstruction technique using costal cartilage and ear reconstruction with high-density porous polyethylene or Medpor (Porex Surgical, Inc, College Park, GA). Autologous ear reconstructive techniques have advantages of durability and low infection rates however are associated with poorer aesthetic outcomes such as poor projection of the ear. Medpor has advantages of a more consistent three-dimensional definition without the need to harvest costochondral cartilage and create a donor site. However, due to its alloplastic material properties, Medpor has historically been reported as having a higher rate of extrusion and infection. This is the first systematic review to compare the outcomes of both techniques. The 6 studies that were reviewed were analyzed against 3 evaluative criteria: aesthetic outcome, complication rate, and convenience of intervention. This is so a comprehensive, evidence-based decision can be made by the surgeon and patient when ear reconstruction is required. The results showed heterogeneity in data and a lack of detailed descriptions of the assessment for aesthetic outcomes and convenience, hence were inconclusive. The results however showed that there were more complications with Medpor framework with 15% of total cases resulting in either extrusion or infection compared to 2% of autologous ear reconstruction framework.

Long-term audiological benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device: a retrospective cohort analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term audiological, surgical and safety outcomes of a complex patient cohort treated with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device (tBCD).

METHODS

This retrospective, monocentric cohort analysis involves 31 adults with conductive (CHL) and mixed hearing loss (MHL). For outcome analysis, study results were divided into short-term follow-up data (< 12 months) and long-term follow-up data (> 12 months).

RESULTS

31 patients with a total person-time of 90.4 years and an average number of 3.2 ± 1.5 preoperatively performed surgeries on the implanted side were investigated. Mean BCD-aided PTA₄ thresholds were significantly lower than unaided PTA_4AC before surgery (64.7 ± 16.1 dB HL; CHL 50.6 ± 10.6 dB HL; MHL 72.8 ± 12.8 dB HL) and did not change between short-term (42.3 ± 13.1 dB HL; CHL 35.8 ± 6.8 dB HL; MHL 45.2 ± 14.3 dB HL) and long-term (43.4 ± 10.0 dB HL; CHL 35.8 ± 4.3 dB HL; MHL 48.1 ± 9.6 dB HL) follow-up periods. Speech intelligibility in the Freiburg monosyllables test at 65 dB improved significantly, from 16.3 ± 21.5% (CHL 26.8 ± 19.0%; MHL 8.7 ± 20.5%) in the unaided condition to 82.7 ± 15.5% (CHL 90.0 ± 12.2%; MHL 79.4 ± 16.3%) in the short-term and 85.5 ± 13.2% (CHL 93.8 ± 7.9%; MHL 79.5 ± 13.3%) BCD-aided in the long-term follow-up periods. Ten minor procedure-related and 6 implant-related (5 minor, 1 major) AEs occurred over the total follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The device provides satisfactory audiological and speech benefit over long-term follow-up periods, up to 7 years. Explant rates were very low, while the overall rate of manageable AEs was high in this complex patient cohort. The device is considered a safe and effective option in the long-term hearing rehabilitation of patients with CHL and MHL.

Audiological results and subjective benefit of an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device in patients with congenital aural atresia

PURPOSE

To review functional and subjective benefit after implantation of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device (BCD) in patients with congenital microtia with atresia or stenosis of the external auditory canal.

METHODS

Retrospective chart analysis and questionnaire on the subjective impression of hearing ( Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-B) of patients treated between 2012 and 2015.

RESULTSRESULTS

18 patients (24 ears) with conductive or mixed hearing loss in unilateral (n = 10) or bilateral (n = 8) atresia were implanted with a BCD. No major complications occurred after implantation. Preoperative unaided air conduction pure tone average at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz (PTA 4 ) was 69.2 ± 11.7 dB, while postoperative aided PTA 4 was 33.4 ± 6.3 dB, resulting in a mean functional hearing gain of 35.9 +/- 15.6 dB. Preoperatively, the mean monosyllabic word recognition score was 22.9 % ± 22.3 %, which increased to 87.1 % +/- 15.1 % in the aided condition. The Oldenburger Sentence Test at S₀N₀ revealed a decrease in signal-to-noise-ratio from - 0.58 ± 4.40 dB in the unaided to - 5.67 ± 3.21 dB in the postoperative aided condition for all patients investigated. 15 of 18 patients had a subjective benefit showing a positive SSQ-B score (mean 1.7).

CONCLUSION

The implantation of an active bone conduction device brings along subjective and functional benefit for patients with conductive or combined hearing loss.

Auricular reconstruction using Medpor combined with different hearing rehabilitation approaches for microtia

BACKGROUND

Congenital microtia-atresia affects patients in two specific ways: severe conductive hearing loss and difficulty in integrating into social environments due to auricle malformation.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety and efficacy of single-stage auricular reconstruction and hearing rehabilitation in children with microtia and external auditory canal atresia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2016 to December 2019, we included 32 patients with microtia and external canal atresia who received auricle reconstruction with high-density polyethylene (Medpor) framework and three different hearing rehabilitation approaches at the Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Twenty patients underwent the traditional external auditory canal and middle ear repair (EACR), eight patients were implanted with Bonebridge (BB) devices, and four patients were implanted with bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in one stage. Postoperative changes in auricle morphology and hearing and speech recognition and occurrence of complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

After 6-24 months of follow-up, the auricle shape recovered well in all three groups, and the average score of 14 fine structures in the auricle was 9.43 (EACR), 10.67 (BB), and 9.75 (BAHA) points. The average score of auricle symmetry was 6.83 (EACR), 6.00 (BB), and 6.44 (BAHA) points. No significant differences in auricle shape were observed among the three groups (p > .05). After surgery, the average hearing improvement in the BB group was 43.33 dB, and the average speech recognition threshold declined to 42.28 dB. In the BAHA group, the average hearing improvement was 35 dB, and the average speech recognition threshold declined to 33.5 dB, similar to that of the BB group. However, in the EACR group, the average hearing improvement was only 4.13 dB, and the average speech recognition threshold declined to 11.36 dB. No vertigo, tinnitus, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, facial nerve paralysis, osseointegration failure, and other complications occurred in all the patients. In the EACR group, auricle stent fracture, ear canal restenosis, and canal atresia occurred in one patient each. In the BAHA group, two patients developed local ear infections.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The procedure of single-stage auricular reconstruction and hearing rehabilitation for microtia is feasible and effective. The appropriate method of hearing reconstruction should be determined by evaluating the development of the inner and middle ear of the patients. For those patients with poor development of the mastoid and ossicular chain, hearing aid devices are recommended to achieve a stable and significant hearing effect.