1
|
Sprinzl G, Toner J, Koitschev A, Berger N, Keintzel T, Rasse T, Baumgartner WD, Honeder C, Magele A, Plontke S, Götze G, Schmutzhard J, Zelger P, Corkill S, Lenarz T, Salcher R. Multicentric study on surgical information and early safety and performance results with the Bonebridge BCI 602: an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:1565-1579. [PMID: 36625869 PMCID: PMC9988757 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07792-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
AIM This European multicentric study aimed to prove safety and performance of the Bonebridge BCI 602 in children and adults suffering from either conductive hearing loss (CHL), mixed hearing loss (MHL), or single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD). METHODS 33 patients (13 adults and 10 children with either CHL or MHL and 10 patients with SSD) in three study groups were included. Patients were their own controls (single-subject repeated measures), comparing the unaided or pre-operative to the 3-month post-operative outcomes. Performance was evaluated by sound field thresholds (SF), word recognition scores (WRS) and/or speech reception thresholds in quiet (SRT) and in noise (SNR). Safety was demonstrated with a device-specific surgical questionnaire, adverse event reporting and stable pure-tone measurements. RESULTS The Bonebridge BCI 602 significantly improved SF thresholds (+ 25.5 dB CHL/MHL/SSD), speech intelligibility in WRS (+ 68.0% CHL/MHL) and SRT in quiet (- 16.5 dB C/MHL) and in noise (- 3.51 dB SNR SSD). Air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC) thresholds remained stable over time. All adverse events were resolved, with none unanticipated. Mean audio processor wearing times in hours [h] per day for the CHL/MHL group were ~ 13 h for adults, ~ 11 h for paediatrics and ~ 6 h for the SSD group. The average surgical length was 57 min for the CHL/MHL group and 42 min for the SSD group. The versatility of the BCI 602 (reduced drilling depth and ability to bend the transition for optimal placement) allows for treatment of normal, pre-operated and malformed anatomies. All audiological endpoints were reached. CONCLUSIONS The Bonebridge BCI 602 significantly improved hearing thresholds and speech understanding. Since implant placement follows the patient's anatomy instead of the shape of the device and the duration of surgery is shorter than with its predecessor, implantation is easier with the BCI 602. Performance and safety were proven for adults and children as well as for the CHL/MHL and SSD indications 3 months post-operatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Sprinzl
- Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Abteilung, Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften und Karl-Landsteiner Institut für Implantierbare Hörsysteme, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, Dunant-Platz 1, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria
| | - Joseph Toner
- Regional Auditory Implant Centre, Beech Hall Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Assen Koitschev
- Klinik für HNO-Krankheiten, Plastische Operationen, Klinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Nadine Berger
- Klinik für HNO-Krankheiten, Plastische Operationen, Klinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Thomas Keintzel
- Abteilung für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenkrankheiten, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
| | - Thomas Rasse
- Abteilung für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenkrankheiten, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
| | - Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
- Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien, Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, Vienna, Austria
| | - Clemens Honeder
- Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien, Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, Vienna, Austria
| | - Astrid Magele
- Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Abteilung, Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften und Karl-Landsteiner Institut für Implantierbare Hörsysteme, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, Dunant-Platz 1, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria
| | - Stefan Plontke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Gerrit Götze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Innsbruck, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philipp Zelger
- Universitätsklinik für Hör-, Stimm- und Sprachstörungen, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Stephanie Corkill
- Regional Auditory Implant Centre, Beech Hall Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik und Poliklinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rolf Salcher
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik und Poliklinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Skarzynski PH, Krol B, Skarzynski H, Cywka KB. Implantation of two generations of Bonebridge after mastoid obliteration with bioactive glass S53P4. Am J Otolaryngol 2022; 43:103601. [PMID: 35981433 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE After radical surgery for chronic cholesteatoma (CWD mastoidectomy), patients have the option to have the posterior wall of their external auditory canal surgically reconstructed with S53P4 bioactive glass. The procedure eliminates some of the restrictions related to having a postoperative cavity and extends the options for a hearing prosthesis. If classic reconstruction is not possible and a hearing aid is not used, we suggest use of a Bonebridge implant. METHODS This study describes, over 18 months of follow-up, 16 patients after a two-stage surgical procedure: obliteration of the mastoid cavity with bioactive glass followed by Bonebridge implantation. There were 7 patients who received the first generation implant (BCI 601) and 9 who used the second (BCI 602). Before and after implantation, pure tone audiometry, sound field thresholds, and free-field audiometry were performed. Speech reception thresholds in noise were assessed using the Polish Sentence Matrix Test. Subjective assessment of benefits was done using the APHAB (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit) questionnaire. RESULTS During the observation period, no serious complications were found. The study demonstrated the safety and validity of the procedures and confirmed the safety of using S53P4 bioactive glass in otosurgery (antibacterial effect, nonrecurrence of cholesteatoma, and no effect on the inner ear). The audiological benefits expected from using the Bonebridge implant processor were also confirmed. CONCLUSION It is concluded that, after reconstructing the posterior wall of the external auditory canal with bioactive glass, two-stage implantation of a Bonebridge implant in a typical site is a safe solution for patients who have difficult anatomical conditions following their CWD mastoidectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr H Skarzynski
- Teleaudiology and Screening Department, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Kajetany, Poland; Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Bartlomiej Krol
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Katarzyna B Cywka
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Kajetany, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cywka KB, Skarzynski PH, Krol B, Hatzopoulos S, Skarzynski H. Evaluation of the Bonebridge BCI 602 active bone conductive implant in adults: efficacy and stability of audiological, surgical, and functional outcomes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279:3525-3534. [PMID: 35182185 PMCID: PMC9130189 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07265-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE (1) To assess the effectiveness and safety of a bone-conduction implant, the Bonebridge BCI 602, in adults with conductive or mixed hearing loss. (2) To investigate whether the Bonebridge BCI 602 is at least as effective as the Bonebridge BCI 601 in such patients. METHODS The study group included 42 adults who had either conductive or mixed hearing loss. All patients underwent Bonebridge BCI 602 implant surgery. Before and after implantation, pure-tone audiometry, speech recognition tests (in quiet and noise), and free-field audiometry were performed. Word recognition scores were evaluated using the Polish Monosyllabic Word Test. Speech reception thresholds in noise were assessed using the Polish Sentence Matrix Test. Subjective assessment of benefits was done using the APHAB (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit) questionnaire. RESULTS The APHAB questionnaire showed that difficulties in hearing decreased after BCI 602 implantation. Both word recognition in quiet and speech reception threshold in noise were significantly better after BCI 602 implantation and remained stable for at least 12 months. A significant advantage of the device is a reduced time for surgery while maintaining safety. In this study, the mean time for BCI 602 implantation was 28.3 min ± 9.4. CONCLUSIONS The second-generation Bonebridge BCI 602 implant is an effective hearing rehabilitation device for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Patient satisfaction and audiological results confirm its efficacy and safety. Its new shape and dimensions allow it to be used in patients previously excluded due to insufficient or difficult anatomical conditions. The new BCI 602 implant is as effective as its predecessor, the BCI 601.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna B Cywka
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H Skarzynski
- Teleaudiology and Screening Department, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17 Street, Nadarzyn, 05-830, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany/Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Bartlomiej Krol
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
| | | | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Otorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seiwerth I, Fröhlich L, Schilde S, Götze G, Plontke SK, Rahne T. Clinical and functional results after implantation of the bonebridge, a semi-implantable, active transcutaneous bone conduction device, in children and adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:101-113. [PMID: 33674927 PMCID: PMC8738362 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06626-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Aim of the study was to evaluate the surgical, clinical and audiological outcome of 32 implantations of the Bonebridge, a semi-implantable transcutaneous active bone conduction implant. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data for 32 implantations in 31 patients (one bilateral case; seven age < 16 years) with conductive or mixed hearing loss, malformations, after multiple ear surgery, or with single-sided deafness as contralateral routing of signal (CROS). Results Four implantations were done as CROS. Five cases were simultaneously planned with ear prosthesis anchors, and 23 implantations (72%) were planned through three-dimensional (3D) “virtual surgery.” In all 3D-planned cases, the implant could be placed as expected. For implant-related complications, rates were 12.5% for minor and 3.1% for major complications. Implantation significantly improved mean sound field thresholds from a preoperative 60 dB HL (SD 12) to 33 dB HL (SD 6) at 3 postoperative months and 34 dB HL (SD 6) at > 11 postoperative months (p < 0.0001). Word recognition score in quiet at 65 dB SPL improved from 11% (SD 20) preoperatively to 74% (SD 19) at 3 months and 83% (SD 15) at > 11 months (p < 0.0001). The speech reception threshold in noise improved from − 1.01 dB unaided to − 2.69 dB best-aided (p = 0.0018). Conclusion We found a clinically relevant audiological benefit with Bonebridge. To overcome anatomical challenges, we recommend preoperative 3D planning in small and hypoplastic mastoids, children, ear malformation, and simultaneous implantation of ear prosthesis anchors and after multiple ear surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingmar Seiwerth
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Germany.
| | - Laura Fröhlich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schilde
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - Gerrit Götze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Stefan K Plontke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Torsten Rahne
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|