Survivorship care for older adults with cancer: U13 conference report

Life-space mobility trajectory patterns and associated characteristics in older cancer survivors: a secondary data analysis

BACKGROUND

Life-space mobility (LSM) measures the size of the real-world geographic area an individual purposely transverses in their daily life. While older cancer survivors often have declines in LSM that negatively affects their quality of life, independence, and social engagement the factors that predispose to adverse outcomes are unknown. Understanding different patterns of LSM and its decline can help identify those needing support. The purpose of this study was to identify: (1) LSM trajectory patterns and (2) factors associated with those patterns in older cancer survivors.

METHODS

This paper reports a secondary data analysis of 153 participants with cancer ≥ 65 years from the University of Alabama Study of Aging. LSM was assessed using the UAB Life-Space Assessment-Composite score (LSA-C) at study entry and every 6 months for 96 months (LSA-C < 60 = restricted LSM). LSM trajectory patterns based on the LSA-C were determined using group-based trajectory analysis. A classification tree analysis revealed factors that predicted the trajectory patterns.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 153) were a mean age of 76.1 (SD 6.33), mostly male (58%), White (58%), married (55%) or widowed (37%), and had a diagnosis of prostate (37.3%), breast (20.3%), or colon (11.8%) cancer. Three LSM trajectory patterns were identified: (1) high start and stable (37.3%) with unrestricted LSM (LSA-C = 81.2) at study entry, which remained stable over time, (2) high start progressive decline (27.5%) with unrestricted LSM (LSA-C = 78.0) at study entry that progressively declined, and (3) low start progressive decline (35.3%) with restricted LSM level (LSA-C = 42.0) at study entry, which progressively declined. Each pattern was associated with a unique set of demographic and clinical characteristics. Baseline physical performance score was the most important predictor of the LSM trajectory patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Three distinct LSM trajectory patterns, each with unique demographic and clinical characteristics, were identified. Because older cancer survivors have distinct LSM patterns, interventions should be tailored to address specific characteristics and clinical needs. LSM measurement can contribute to assessment of older adults generally and should become part of standard assessment in older cancer survivors.

Analysis of the Relationship Between Rural-Urban Status and Use of Digital Health Technology Among Older Cancer Survivors Based on the Health Information National Trends Survey: Cross-Sectional Analysis

Background

Though telehealth has been a promising avenue for engaging cancer survivors with health care and lifestyle programming, older and rural-dwelling cancer survivors may have additional challenges in accessing digital devices and tools that have not yet been described. This study aimed to use a robust, nationally representative sample collected in 2022 to provide an updated view of digital technology use and the use of technology for health in this population.

Objective

This study aimed to examine the prevalence of digital technology use for health-related activities among older cancer survivors in both rural and urban settings. The primary outcomes of interest included (1) internet access and use for health-related activities, (2) digital device ownership and use as a tool for health behaviors, (3) use of social media for health, and (4) use of telehealth.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey Cycle 6 (HINTS 6) was completed to examine the prevalence of digital technology use among older cancer survivors. For analysis, the sample was restricted to cancer survivors over the age of 60 years (n=710). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to test the association between rurality and digital health tool use.

Results

Overall, 17% (125/710) of the sample lived in a rural area of the United States and the mean sample age was 73 (SD 8.2) years. Older cancer survivors, regardless of rural-urban status, reported a high prevalence of internet usage (n=553, 79.9%), digital device ownership (n=676, 94.9%), and social media use (n=448, 66.6%). In unadjusted models, rural survivors were less likely than urban survivors to report that they had used a health or wellness application in the previous year (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; P=.04). In adjusted models, rural survivors were more likely to report that they had shared personal health information on social media (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.13-6.19; P=.03). There were no differences in the proportion of rural and urban respondents who reported receiving health services through telehealth in the previous year.

Conclusions

Regardless of the residential status, older cancer survivors report high internet and technology use for health-related activities. These results show promise for the feasibility of using digital technologies to implement supportive care and wellness programming with older cancer survivors.

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of brief behavioral activation among older adult cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

As many as 35% of older adult cancer survivors (OACS; i.e., ≥65 years old) have clinically significant depression. OACS often experience fatigue, mild cognitive impairment, and increased medical comorbidities post-cancer that make them susceptible to depression. Behavioral activation (BA) is an empirically supported depression treatment in geriatric psychiatry that guides individuals to reengage in pleasurable and rewarding activities and has great potential for addressing the needs of OACS. This manuscript presents the protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of a brief BA intervention adapted to address the needs of OACS (BBA-OACS) by telephone and videoconference delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An RCT will be conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) in New York City. Participants will be randomized to either BA as a target intervention or supportive psychotherapy (SP) as a standard of care control intervention for outpatient oncology. The target intervention includes 10 weekly sessions of BA consisting of psychoeducation about depression and the rationale for BA, life areas and values assessment, compilation of a list of enjoyable and important activities across values, activity scheduling, and self-monitoring of satisfaction and mood. The standard of care control intervention includes 10 weekly sessions of SP consisting of reassurance, guidance, encouragement, and support for patients with cancer. OACS who have a history of cancer, report elevated depressive symptoms, are fluent in English, and can communicate via telephone or videoconference will be recruited from the MSK Survivorship Clinics across all disease types. Seventy participants will be recruited for the study (10 training cases, 30 in each RCT arm). The primary aim is to evaluate implementation outcomes (i.e., acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity) of BA, relative to SP, for cancer survivorship. The secondary aim is to determine the preliminary effects of BA on depressive symptoms (primary outcome), anxiety, coping, and increased activity level (secondary outcomes) compared to SP. Participants will be asked to complete a set of three surveys pre- and post-intervention.

DISCUSSION

If successful, BBA-OACS would provide frontline clinicians with an accessible, evidence-based treatment for OACS. Future research will evaluate the efficacy of BA in a larger trial and its impact on depression and other healthcare outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT05574127).

Restricted life-space mobility impacts physical but not mental quality of life in older cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Older cancer survivors often value quality of life (QOL) over survival. Life-space mobility (LSM), defined as the individual's spatial geographic mobility range, is an important QOL indicator in older adults with chronic illnesses; however, this relationship is unexplored in older cancer survivors.

METHODS

We examined the longitudinal associations and causal relationships between LSM and QOL in 153 older cancer survivors (≥65 years) from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Study of Aging. LSM was assessed using the UAB Life-Space Assessment-Composite score (LSA-C), and QOL was assessed by the SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS12) and Physical Component Score (PCS12) at 0 (study entry), 6, 18, 36, 54, and 72 months. We examined the causal relationship between LSM and QOL using a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM).

RESULTS

The cohort (n = 153) was 76 years old on average and predominantly White (58%), female (58%), and married (55%). Longitudinal analyses found LSM decreased over time (p < 0.0001), and this decrease was associated with decreased QOL (PCS12, p < 0.0001, MCS12, p < 0.0001). In the CLPM causal analysis, lower LSM resulted in worse PCS12 (p < 0.001), but not worse MSC12.

CONCLUSIONS

Restricted LSM resulted in worse physical QOL over 72 months in a sample of 153 older cancer survivors. Developing and evaluating interventions to preserve greater LSM could be a promising approach to improving QOL.

Cancer survivors 75 years and older: physical, emotional and practical needs

OBJECTIVES

To describe physical, emotional and practical concerns and access to help of Canadian cancer survivors aged 75+ years following treatment.

METHODS

A survey was designed to identify concerns and access to help across three supportive care domains for cancer survivors 1-3 years post-treatment. Random samples were drawn from 10 provincial cancer registries. Survey packages were mailed to 40 790 survivors with option to reply by mail or online in French or English. Descriptive analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 3274 (25%) survivors aged 75+ years responded to the survey. Fifty-five per cent were men, 72% had not experienced metastatic spread and 75% reported comorbid conditions. Eighty-one per cent reported experiencing at least one physical concern, 63% experienced at least one emotional concern and 30% experienced at least one practical concern. The most commonly reported concerns were for two physical changes (fatigue 62% and bladder/urinary problems 39%) and one emotional change (anxiety/fear of recurrence 53%). More than 50% did not receive assistance for 15 concerns across the three domains. The most frequently cited reason for not seeking help for a concern was that they were told it was normal and they did not think anything could be done. Unmet needs existed for all physical, emotional and practical changes ranging from 41% to 88% of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Many older adults are at risk for experiencing physical, emotional and practical concerns following cancer treatment yet are not obtaining help. Action is needed for early identification of these individuals to mitigate the impact of unmet needs for older cancer survivors.

Cancer survivorship at heart: a multidisciplinary cardio-oncology roadmap for healthcare professionals

In cancer, a patient is considered a survivor from the time of initial diagnosis until the end of life. With improvements in early diagnosis and treatment, the number of cancer survivors (CS) has grown considerably and includes: (1) Patients cured and free from cancer who may be at risk of late-onset cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT); (2) Patients with long-term control of not-curable cancers in whom CTR-CVT may need to be addressed. This paper highlights the importance of the cancer care continuum, of a patient-centered approach and of a prevention-oriented policy. The ultimate goal is a personalized care of CS, achievable only through a multidisciplinary-guided survivorship care plan, one that replaces the fragmented management of current healthcare systems. Collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists is the pillar of a framework in which primary care providers and other specialists must be engaged and in which familial, social and environmental factors are also taken into account.

Geriatric Oncology in the Instagram Era: Feasibility and Acceptability Randomised Controlled Trial on Adopting PhotoVoice to Enable Empowerment, Patient-Centred Care, and Shared Decision Making-Study Protocol

Geriatric assessment (GA) is fundamental to optimising cancer care in older adults, yet implementing comprehensive GA tools in real-world clinical settings remains a challenge. This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of integrating information from patient-derived photographs (PhotoVoice) into enhanced supportive care (ESC) for older adults with cancer. A feasibility randomised controlled trial will be conducted at a regional cancer care centre in Australia. Participants aged 70 and above will be randomised into two groups: PhotoVoice plus ESC or usual care (ESC) alone. In the PhotoVoice group, participants will provide four photographs for deduction of representations of different aspects of their lives using photo-elicitation techniques. ESC will be conducted for both groups, incorporating PhotoVoice analysis in the intervention group. PhotoVoice may improve patient-centred care outcomes, including enhanced communication, shared decision making, and identification of patient priorities and barriers. Findings will provide insights into implementing PhotoVoice in geriatric assessment and guide future trials in cancer among older adults.

New horizons in managing older cancer survivors: complexities and opportunities

Older adults represent a growing population amongst cancer survivors who require specific consideration given the complex and largely unknown interactions between cancer-related concerns and age-related conditions. The increasing use of geriatric assessment (GA) has enabled oncologists to appropriately assess older patients' overall health status, personalise anti-cancer treatment and improve survival. However, whilst current research and practice focus on improving the management of older adults with cancer in the acute setting, the progress in the field of survivorship research in geriatric oncology is lagging. As cancer survivorship is a continuum, planning for a healthy survivorship should start at the time of cancer diagnosis. GA can play an important role in identifying potential survivorship issues and optimising delivery of survivorship care. A goal-directed, patient-focused geriatric survivorship care plan that involves a multidisciplinary team provides a framework for a personalised delivery of survivorship care in this patient group and there is a need for tailored interventions that support self-management and care integration. Research on the impact of cancer and its treatment on geriatric-specific outcomes needs to be prioritised through global initiatives to encompass a diverse and heterogenous population of adult cancer survivors.

Protocol paper: Multi-site, cluster-randomized clinical trial for optimizing functional outcomes of older cancer survivors after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors over the age of 65 have unique needs due to the higher prevalence of functional and cognitive impairment, comorbidities, geriatric syndromes, and greater need for social support after chemotherapy. In this study, we will evaluate whether a Geriatric Evaluation and Management-Survivorship (GEMS) intervention improves functional outcomes important to older cancer survivors following chemotherapy.

METHODS

A cluster-randomized trial will be conducted in approximately 30 community oncology practices affiliated with the University of Rochester Cancer Center (URCC) National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Base. Participating sites will be randomized to the GEMS intervention, which includes Advanced Practice Practitioner (APP)-directed geriatric evaluation and management (GEM), and Survivorship Health Education (SHE) that is combined with Exercise for Cancer Patients (EXCAP©®), or usual care. Cancer survivors will be recruited from community oncology practices (of participating oncology physicians and APPs) after the enrolled clinicians have consented and completed a baseline survey. We will enroll 780 cancer survivors aged 65 years and older who have completed curative-intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor malignancy within four weeks of study enrollment. Cancer survivors will be asked to choose one caregiver to also participate for a total up to 780 caregivers. The primary aim is to compare the effectiveness of GEMS for improving patient-reported physical function at six months. The secondary aim is to compare effectiveness of GEMS for improving patient-reported cognitive function at six months. Tertiary aims include comparing the effectiveness of GEMS for improving: 1) Patient-reported physical function at twelve months; 2) objectively assessed physical function at six and twelve months; and 3) patient-reported cognitive function at twelve months and objectively assessed cognitive function at six and twelve months. Exploratory health care aims include: 1) Survivor satisfaction with care, 2) APP communication with primary care physicians (PCPs), 3) completion of referral appointments, and 4) hospitalizations at six and twelve months. Exploratory caregiver aims include: 1) Caregiver distress; 2) caregiver quality of life; 3) caregiver burden; and 4) satisfaction with patient care at six and twelve months.

DISCUSSION

If successful, GEMS would be an option for a standardized APP-led survivorship care intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT05006482, registered on August 9, 2021.

Understanding the Symptoms and Concerns of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer in Alberta: A Comparative Cohort Study Using Patient-Reported Outcomes

Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are in a unique situation due to their age and developmental stage in life and may have different symptoms and concerns than older patients. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) questionnaires, routinely used in Alberta, can help identify the distinct needs of AYAs. We aimed to compare PROs data for AYAs and older adults (OAs) to better understand how the concerns of AYAs differ, which is key to providing individualized care and creating targeted programming and system-level change. Methods: Retrospective data were collected for two patient cohorts who completed at least one PROs questionnaire between October 1, 2019 and April 1, 2020. The AYA cohort was aged 18-39, and the OA cohort was aged 40 and older. Symptoms were compared using mean scores and multiple linear regression, and concerns were compared using counts and multivariate negative binomial regression. Results: AYAs had significantly higher mean scores on depression and anxiety, compared to OAs, and lower mean scores for most physical symptoms. They indicated significantly more concerns in the Emotional and Social/Family/Spiritual domains, and were over three times more likely to indicate Work/School as a concern. Conclusion: AYAs with cancer have distinct concerns that should be addressed to ensure comprehensive, quality cancer care for this population. PROs data are useful in identifying needs and facilitating evidence-based, data-driven change at all levels of the health care system.

Challenges of Survivorship for Older Adults Diagnosed with Cancer

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this brief review is to highlight significant recent developments in survivorship research and care of older adults following cancer treatment. The aim is to provide insight into care and support needs of older adults during cancer survivorship as well as directions for future research.

Recent Findings

The numbers of older adult cancer survivors are increasing globally. Increased attention to the interaction between age-related and cancer-related concerns before, during, and after cancer treatment is needed to optimize outcomes and quality of life among older adult survivors. Issues of concern to older survivors, and ones associated with quality of life, include physical and cognitive functioning and emotional well-being. Maintaining activities of daily living, given limitations imposed by cancer treatment and other comorbidities, is of primary importance to older survivors. Evidence concerning the influence of income and rurality, experiences in care coordination and accessing services, and effectiveness of interventions remains scant for older adults during survivorship.

Summary

There is a clear need for further research relating to tailored intervention and health care provider knowledge and education. Emerging issues, such as the use of medical assistance in dying, must be considered in this population.

Exploring the relationships between income and emotional/practical concerns and help-seeking by older adult cancer survivors: A secondary analysis

PURPOSE

The number of older cancer survivors is growing rapidly and expected to double through the next decade. Survivors can face challenges from treatment as well as other co-morbid conditions which may influence quality of living and generate distress. Understanding more about factors influencing whether older cancer survivors receive the help they desire is important for cancer program planning. The purpose of this analysis was to understand relationships between income and emotional/practical concerns, help-seeking experiences and unmet needs of adults 65+ years one to three years following cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was conducted with randomly selected Canadian cancer survivors about their survivorship care. Drawing from these publicly available data, this secondary analysis examines prevalence of concerns, help-seeking, receipt of help, reasons for not seeking help, responses to information questions, and overall unmet needs for trends across income groups.

RESULTS

7975 respondents 65+ years responded, of which the 5891 (73.9%) indicating annual household income were analyzed. Over 80% responded to questions regarding emotional/practical concerns following treatment with the largest proportions reporting emotional concerns for anxiety/fear of cancer returning (63%) and depression (49%), and practical concerns regarding transportation for appointments (33%) and paying healthcare bills (31%). Individuals with household incomes <$25,000 reported higher levels of concern than other income groups and higher proportions sought assistance for their concerns. Across income levels, 20% reported difficulty finding assistance to address their concerns.

DISCUSSION

Older cancer survivors across all income categories reported emotional/practical concerns, lack of information about these issues, and unmet needs regarding both emotional and practical concerns. Many encountered challenges obtaining help with those in lower income categories more severely affected despite Canada's universal health care system. Financial burden ought to be assessed with older survivors on an on-going basis to ensure relevant intervention.

"Moving Forward": Older Adult Motivations for Group-Based Physical Activity After Cancer Treatment

Background

Engagement in physical activity (PA) post-treatment can improve health outcomes and quality of life among cancer survivors. The purpose of this study is to explore United States (US) older adult cancer survivors’ (OACS) reasons for engaging in group-based PA classes, to identify themes supporting exercise motivations in the context of cancer recovery.

Methods

OACS participating in a fitness program at a large US comprehensive cancer center completed semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using modified grounded theory, and demographic data were analyzed descriptively.

Results

Modified grounded theory analysis (n = 25; age M = 70.92, SD = 10.82; 9 cancer types) identified individual rationales for exercise grounded in collective experience. Participants’ internal motivations for PA are shaped by the desire for control over an uncertain future and post-treatment body, obtained by literally “moving forward” post-cancer; this is supported by external motivations for social connections that present a positive model of survivorship, within a setting that instills confidence and safety.

Conclusions

Exercise can be a way for older adults to tap into internal and external motivations that support cancer survivorship. Interventions that make explicit connections between exercise and cancer recovery, facilitate interpersonal interaction, and promote a sense of safety may be the most effective. The concepts identified in this study can inform the development of future interventions to improve long-term behavior change among OACS and evaluate existing PA programs.

Analysis of Age-Friendly Cancer Care Readiness

OBJECTIVES

Cancer care attuned to meeting the needs of older adults is imperative to ensure that they receive appropriate levels of treatment in accordance with their goals of care. Achieving age-friendly systems and geriatric-competent workforces require rethinking current models of cancer care delivery. This article reports on a descriptive study on the readiness of U.S. cancer programs to provide age-friendly cancer care.

SAMPLE & SETTING

A survey was sent to 567 ambulatory oncology leaders in the United States. Of the 81 respondents, 61 answered all questions.

METHODS & VARIABLES

The authors developed and administered an online survey assessing cancer programs' age-friendly cancer care practices and readiness. Survey questions were based on the elements of the 4Ms framework. Results were analyzed using frequencies and percentages for categorically measured survey items and measures of central tendency for continuously scaled survey items.

RESULTS

67% of respondents reported that their program could deliver age-friendly cancer care within five years. Respondents less frequently indicated that they employed specific 4Ms elements.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

The results of this study suggest gaps in readiness to implement age-friendly cancer care. Recommendations to improve readiness include increasing awareness, expanding workforce preparation, and improving cancer program leadership engagement.

Evolving landscape of cancer survivorship research: an analysis of the Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2007-2020

PURPOSE

To provide an analysis of papers published by the Journal of Cancer Survivorship (JCSU) from March 1, 2007 (its inception) until December 31, 2020.

METHODS

Characteristics (locations, study type, cancer type, keywords assigned by original authors) of all included articles were extracted into EndNote X9 and were coded and analyzed using Excel, NVivo v.R1.3 and VOSviewer, v.1.616. Journal Impact Factor and citation counts of each manuscript were downloaded from Clarivate Journal Citation Reports and Scopus®, respectively.

RESULTS

Published papers are predominantly from the USA, Australia, and the UK. While breast cancer continues to be the dominant cancer type, a range of different cancer types and populations with mixed-cancer types have been addressed in the journal. Cross-sectional designs were the most used. JCSU's impact factor experienced a steady growth between 2011 and 2015 and stabilized over recent years (2016-2020), at 3.296 (1 year) and 3.830 (5 years). Keyword co-occurrence analyses indicated prominent themes including quality of life, physical activity, late effects, follow-up care, and psychosocial aspects of cancer survivorship.

CONCLUSIONS

JCSU has made a significant contribution thus far by disseminating knowledge in cancer survivorship. This paper provides insights of JCSU's success to date and recommends further diversification and directions for practice areas that are novel or have received less attention by the cancer survivorship community.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

This journal stands ready to publish new information that informs the cancer survivorship community on the multidimensional nature of cancer and facilitates translation into quality care across many different settings and across the globe.

Association of Dietary Quality, Inflammatory Markers, and Physical Functioning among Older Female Cancer Survivors

One area within geriatric oncology that is understudied and undertreated is the dietary quality of older cancer survivors. Most older adults with cancer experience nutritional deficits due to their age and cancer treatment. Research has shown the impact of competing comorbidities, polypharmacy, and decline in functional and cognitive status on older adults' nutritional needs. This study sought to examine the diet quality of older female cancer survivors, and its association with inflammatory markers and physical functioning. Participants completed surveys online, by mail, or phone. Additional participant information was obtained through medical records. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, forward linear regressions were used to analyze these data. Older female cancer survivors (≥65) that had completed their initial cancer treatment in the past 5 years were recruited through cancer clinic visits and medical records. The study was conducted from November 2018 through January 2020. Self-reported physical functioning (RAND-36), diet quality (DHQ-II, HEI-2015), and BMI were obtained from surveys. Participant diagnosis, comorbidities, and inflammatory marker (c-reactive protein (CRP)) were obtained through electronic medical records; albumin was collected as a marker correlated with inflammation. The average age of participants (n = 171) was 73.6 ± 8.4 years. Mean physical functioning score was 60 ± 24 out of 100. Mean total HEI scores were 66.39 + 10.0 out of 100. Positive correlations were observed between total HEI scores and physical functioning, self-rated health, albumin, education, and income. Negative correlations were observed between physical functioning and BMI, self-rated health, albumin, and age. Regressions indicated that individuals who had higher HEI scores were more likely to report higher physical functioning (β = 0.38, P < 0.001). Identifying dietary quality and markers to overall assess inflammation is pertinent to improve the long-term health of cancer survivors. The strong correlations between physical function, HEI, and albumin demonstrates the relationship albumin has with inflammation and its subtle impact it can have on older cancer survivors. Along with CRP, serum albumin should be interpreted in the context of the patient's overall health. Future larger cohort studies of older cancer survivors with longitudinal measurements are warranted.

Age differences in cancer-related stress, spontaneous emotion regulation, and emotional distress

OBJECTIVES

Cancer risk increases with age, cancer-related stress is common and devastating to mental health of patients, yet little work has explored age differences in cancer-related stress. This study investigated sources of stress related to cancer diagnosis and treatment and its association with age and emotional health. Though not an a priori aim of the study, adaptive strategies mentioned within discussions of stress-which we classify as spontaneous emotion regulation (ER) - were also investigated.

METHOD

Participants (N = 147, aged 27-88) recruited from the VA (98% male) with oral-digestive cancers participated in semi-structured interviews regarding sources of stress 6-months post-diagnosis (T1) and treatment-related stress at 12-months post-diagnosis (T2). Patients also reported their emotional distress at T2 via the PROMIS-29. Inductive content analysis was used to classify sources of stress and ER into semantic themes and relative frequencies.

RESULTS

The greatest source of stress at diagnosis was psychological; physical symptoms were the greatest source of stress at treatment. Older adults less frequently reported psychological uncertainty, social stress, and situational stress, whereas age groups reported similar rates of physical stress. When describing stress, older adults more often made spontaneous references to emotion regulation (ER). Across age groups, those who reported stress without ER in qualitative comments had higher emotional distress on the PROMIS-29 than those reporting stress with ER or no stress.

CONCLUSION

ER may be key to psychological adjustment to cancer, especially in later-life. implications for assessment of stress at pivotal visits and mental health referral are discussed.

Older Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Are Less Knowledgeable About Survivorship Issues: Outcomes from a Survey-based Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As the incidence and survival for hepatocellular carcinoma increase, the number of patients having been treated for liver cancer would be expected to increase as well. Little is known about the experience of the survivors of hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

The authors conducted a 3-tool survey of hepatocellular carcinoma survivors at a large, academic, and tertiary referral medical center to assess potential areas of disparities in the survivorship experience. The instruments aimed to assess knowledge of survivorship issues (Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Questionnaire-1), preparedness for the survivorship experience (Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Questionnaire-2), and self-efficacy in procuring medical information while navigating the patient-provider relationship (Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Questionnaire). The authors compared mean test scores for each instrument, with higher scores indicating a more positive response, by patient characteristics and used s linear regression model to examine associations between sociodemographics and survey scores.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients took at least 1 survey. In the multiple linear regression model, the authors found that for every increase in patient age by 10 years, knowledge of survivorship issues decreased by a total score of 1.3 (P=0.02). In this model, the authors found no significant differences between male and female respondents, English and non-English speakers, and liver transplant recipients and nonliver transplant recipients. Survivors who had completed a 4-year college degree had significantly higher knowledge of survivorship issues than those who did not use χ testing, but this finding did not maintain significance in the multiple linear regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population of 110 ethnically diverse hepatocellular carcinoma survivors, the authors found older patients had gaps in knowledge of survivorship issues. Particular attention should be paid to older populations during liver cancer treatment.

Main challenges in survivorship transitions: Perspectives of older adults with cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe main challenges experienced by older adults (75+ years) following primary cancer treatment as a basis for development of age-appropriate survivorship care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A national survey was conducted across ten Canadian provinces to identify experiences with follow-up for cancer survivors one to three years post-treatment. The survey included open-ended questions for respondents to add details that offered deeper insight into their experiences. This publication presents analysis of responses from older adults (75+ years) about the main challenge they faced in transitioning to survivorship.

RESULTS

In total, 3274 older adults (75+ years) responded to the survey and 2057 responded to the main challenge question. Fifty-five percent were male, 72% had not experienced metastatic disease and 75% reported comorbid conditions. The 1571 (48.0%) respondents reporting at least one main challenge described 2426 challenges categorized as physical, emotional, practical, lifestyle adjustments, health care delivery, and relationships/support. Physical challenges were identified most frequently (68.2%, n = 1655) including physical capacity (35.8%), symptoms/side effects (32.7%), and changes in bodily function/appearance (31.3%). Thematic analysis revealed three themes: 'getting back on my feet', 'adjusting to the changes', and 'finding the support I needed'.

CONCLUSION

This work highlights gaps in early cancer survivorship for older adults and raises concerns about unexamined ageism within the Canadian cancer care system. A need for comprehensive geriatric assessments is evident before and toward the end of primary treatment to individualize care plans. Proactive provision of information about managing changes from treatment, offered in meaningful multi-modal ways, is important.

Improving survivorship care: Perspectives of cancer survivors 75 years and older

PURPOSE

This work describes perspectives of older adult cancer survivors about improvements that should be considered during the early period of survivorship. Findings will be useful in program development of age-appropriate services following completion of cancer treatment for older adults.

METHODS

A national survey was conducted across ten Canadian provinces to understand follow-up experiences of cancer survivors one to three years post-treatment. The survey included open-ended questions enabling respondents to offer insight into their experiences. This publication presents analysis of responses from older adults (75+ years) about suggestions for improving survivorship care.

RESULTS

In total, 3274 older adults (75+ years) responded to the survey and 1424 responded to the question about improvements. Fifty-five percent of the older adults were male, 28% had experienced metastatic disease and 75% reported comorbid conditions. A total of 640 respondents offered 932 suggestions in the areas of service delivery (n = 763, 81.9%), support (n = 108, 11.6%), and practical assistance (n = 61, 6.5%). Improvements in information/communication (n = 291) and follow-up care (n = 180) accounted for the highest number of suggestions regarding service delivery. Thematic analysis revealed three key messages about improvement: 'offer me needed support', 'make access easy for me', and 'show me you care'.

CONCLUSION

Suggestions for improvement in survivorship care by older adults treated for cancer emphasize need for changes in the approaches taken by health care providers in interactions and organization of care delivery. Proactive provision of information, detailed schedules for follow-up care, and ease of access to post-treatment care are needed.

Perceptions of care coordination among older adult cancer survivors: A SEER-CAHPS study

OBJECTIVE

Care coordination reflects deliberate efforts to harmonize patient care. This study examined variables associated with patient-reported care coordination scores among Medicare beneficiaries with a history of cancer.

METHODS

We utilized Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (SEER-CAHPS) linked data, which includes cancer registry data, patient experience surveys, and Medicare claims. We identified Medicare beneficiaries with a CAHPS survey ≤10 years after cancer diagnosis who reported seeing a personal doctor within six months. Multivariable regression models examined associations between cancer survivor characteristics and patient-reported care coordination, with higher scores indicating better coordination.

RESULTS

Cancer site distribution of the 14,646 survey respondents was 33.7% prostate, 22.1% breast, 11.1% colorectal, 7.2% lung, and 25.9% other. Rural residence at diagnosis (versus urban, 1.1-point difference; p = 0.04) and reporting >4 visits with a personal doctor (versus 1-2 visits, 3.0-point difference; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher care coordination. Older age (p < 0.001) and seeing more specialists (p = 0.006) were associated with significantly lower care coordination. Patients with melanoma (women: 5.2-point difference, p < 0.001; men: 2.7 points, p = 0.01) or breast cancer (women: 2.4 points; p < 0.001) reported significantly lower care coordination scores than did men with prostate cancer (reference group). Time from diagnosis to survey, cancer stage, number of cancers, and comorbidities were not significantly associated with care coordination scores.

DISCUSSION

Cancer site, rural residence, and number of physician interactions are associated with patient-reported care coordination scores. Future research should address multilevel influences that lead to worse care coordination for older adult cancer survivors.

Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019

Adults aged 85 years and older, the "oldest old," are the fastest-growing age group in the United States, yet relatively little is known about their cancer burden. Combining data from the National Cancer Institute, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the National Center for Health Statistics, the authors provide comprehensive information on cancer occurrence in adults aged 85 years and older. In 2019, there will be approximately 140,690 cancer cases diagnosed and 103,250 cancer deaths among the oldest old in the United States. The most common cancers in these individuals (lung, breast, prostate, and colorectum) are the same as those in the general population. Overall cancer incidence rates peaked in the oldest men and women around 1990 and have subsequently declined, with the pace accelerating during the past decade. These trends largely reflect declines in cancers of the prostate and colorectum and, more recently, cancers of the lung among men and the breast among women. We note differences in trends for some cancers in the oldest age group (eg, lung cancer and melanoma) compared with adults aged 65 to 84 years, which reflect elevated risks in the oldest generations. In addition, cancers in the oldest old are often more advanced at diagnosis. For example, breast and colorectal cancers diagnosed in patients aged 85 years and older are about 10% less likely to be diagnosed at a local stage compared with those diagnosed in patients aged 65 to 84 years. Patients with cancer who are aged 85 years and older have the lowest relative survival of any age group, with the largest disparities noted when cancer is diagnosed at advanced stages. They are also less likely to receive surgical treatment for their cancers; only 65% of breast cancer patients aged 85 years and older received surgery compared with 89% of those aged 65 to 84 years. This difference may reflect the complexities of treating older patients, including the presence of multiple comorbidities, functional declines, and cognitive impairment, as well as competing mortality risks and undertreatment. More research on cancer in the oldest Americans is needed to improve outcomes and anticipate the complex health care needs of this rapidly growing population.

Arti Hurria and the progress in integrating the geriatric assessment into oncology: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper

Until recently, the progress in the diagnosis and management of cancer has not been matched by similar progress in the assessment of the increasing numbers of older and more complex patients with cancer. Dr. Arti Hurria identified this gap at the outset of her career, which she dedicated toward studying the geriatric assessment (GA) as an improvement over traditional methods used in oncology to assess vulnerability in older patients with cancer. This review documents the progress of the GA and its integration into oncology. First, we detail the GA's origins in the field of geriatrics. Next, we chronicle the early rise of geriatric oncology, highlighting the calls of early thought-leaders to meet the demands of the rapidly aging cancer population. We describe Dr. Hurria's early efforts toward meeting these calls though the implementation of the GA in oncology research. We then summarize some of the seminal studies constituting the evidence base supporting GA's implementation. Finally, we lay out the evolution of cancer-focused guidelines recommending the GA, concluding with future needs to advance the next steps toward more widespread implementation in routine cancer care. Throughout, we describe Dr. Hurria's vision and its execution in driving progress of the GA in oncology, from her fellowship training to her co-authored guidelines recommending GA for all older adults with cancer-published in the year of her untimely death.

Lessons Learned from Arti-Collaborating to Improve Care: the Past, Present, and Future of the Cancer and Aging Research Group

Dr Arti Hurria, who died tragically in November 2018, was a driving force in the growing field of geriatric oncology. She led the field through her commitment to her goals, collaboration with her colleagues, and the creation of the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG). As two of her closest colleagues, we are carrying her work forward with our colleagues through an infrastructure grant we led with Arti from the National Institute on Aging (R21/33; CARinG). This grant will provide a national structure for continuing to build the field through research, mentorship, and dissemination. We miss our friend dearly but are committed to carrying her legacy forward through CARG. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:879-883, 2019.

[The post-cancer period in geriatric oncology]

The increase in life expectancy together with the increased survival of patients with cancer is resulting in the emergence of a new population: that of cancer survivors whose health status is inferior to that of people not affected by this disease. The interaction between the cancer, the sequelae of the different treatments and other ageing-related health problems requires joint reflection on the best way of caring for this emerging geriatric population.

Healthcare experience among older cancer survivors: Analysis of the SEER-CAHPS dataset

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about factors affecting medical care experiences of cancer survivors. This study examined experience of care among cancer survivors and assessed associations of survivors' characteristics with their experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used a newly-developed, unique data resource, SEER-CAHPS (NCI's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results [SEER] data linked to Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [CAHPS] survey responses), to examine experiences of care among breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer survivors age >66years who completed CAHPS >1year after cancer diagnosis and survived ≥1year after survey completion. Experience of care was assessed by survivor-provided scores for overall care, health plan, physicians, customer service, doctor communication, and aspects of care. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations of survivors' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with care experience.

RESULTS

Among 19,455 cancer survivors with SEER-CAHPS data, higher self-reported general-health status was significantly associated with better care experiences for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivors. In contrast, better mental-health status was associated with better care experience for lung cancer survivors. College-educated and Asian survivors were less likely to indicate high scores for care experiences. Few differences in survivors' experiences were observed by sex or years since diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEER-CAHPS data resources allows assessment of factors influencing experience of cancer among U.S. cancer survivors. Higher self-reported health status was associated with better experiences of care; other survivors' characteristics also predicted care experience. Interventions to improve cancer survivors' health status, such as increased access to supportive care services, may improve experience of care.

Advance care planning within survivorship care plans for older cancer survivors: A systematic review

Advances in the medical treatment of cancer have increased the number of survivors, particularly among older adults, who now represent the majority of these. Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are documents that cancer patients receive summarising their care, usually at the end of treatment but preferably from initial diagnosis. These may increase patient satisfaction and represent an opportunity to initiate preventative strategies and address future care needs. Advance care planning (ACP), incorporating advance healthcare decision-making, including formal written directives, increases satisfaction and end-of-life care. This paper systematically reviews evaluations of ACP within SCPs among older (≥65 years) cancer survivors. No studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified by search strategies conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases. One paper examined cancer survivors' mainly positive views of ACP. Another discussed the use of a SCP supported by a 'distress inventory' that included an advance care directive (living will) as an issue, though no formal evaluation was reported. Although ACP is important for older adults, no study was found that evaluated its role within survivorship care planning. Despite the risk of recurrence and the potential for morbidity and mortality, especially among older cancer survivors, ACP is not yet a feature of SCPs.