Real life safety and effectiveness of nivolumab in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Results from the Belgian compassionate use program

Phase 4 Multinational Multicenter Retrospective and Prospective Real-World Study of Nivolumab in Recurrent and Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

This study examined the real-world use of nivolumab in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). This was a multinational retrospective study (VOLUME) assessing treatment effectiveness and safety outcomes and a prospective study (VOLUME-PRO) assessing HRQoL and patient-reported symptoms. There were 447 and 51 patients in VOLUME and VOLUME-PRO, respectively. Across both studies, the median age was 64.0 years, 80.9% were male, and 52.6% were former smokers. Clinical outcomes of interest included real-world overall survival (rwOS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). The median rwOS was 9.2 months. Among patients with at least one assessment, 21.7% reported their best response as 'partial response', with 3.9% reporting 'complete response'. The median duration of response (DoR) and median rwPFS were 11.0 months and 3.9 months, respectively. At baseline, VOLUME-PRO patients reported difficulties relating to fatigue, physical and sexual functioning, dyspnea, nausea, sticky saliva, dry mouth, pain/discomfort, mobility, and financial difficulties. There were improvements in social functioning and financial difficulties throughout the study; however, no other clinically meaningful changes were noted. No new safety concerns were identified. This real-world, multinational, multicenter, retrospective and prospective study supports the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab for R/M SCCHN patients.

Real-World Analysis of Nivolumab and Atezolizumab Efficacy in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) and atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) have shown superior survival outcomes and improved adverse effects compared to standard chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the efficacy of both treatments has not been directly compared in clinical trials. This retrospective, single-centre study was performed from June 2015 to December 2020 and included a cohort of 158 previously treated patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC who received PD-1 (nivolumab) (n = 89) or PD-L1 (atezolizumab) (n = 69) inhibitors at the Virgen del Rocío Hospital in Seville. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22.5% in the nivolumab group and 14.5% in the atezolizumab group (p = 0.140). Multivariate analysis did not show significant differences between the two groups for PFS and OS (PFS hazard ratio (HR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55−1.17, p = 0.260; OS HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.52−1.21, p = 0.281). Adverse events of all grades occurred in 68 patients in the nivolumab group (76.4%) and in 34 patients in the atezolizumab group (49.3%) (p < 0.001). Atezolizumab and nivolumab did not show statistically significant differences in survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC, even when stratified by histological subtype (squamous versus nonsquamous). However, the safety analysis suggested a more favourable toxicity profile for atezolizumab.

Safety and Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Older Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review of 48 Real-World Studies

BACKGROUND

Over recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the clinical management and prognosis for most cancers. However, data on older patients in clinical trials are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of real-life studies to explore the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in unselected older individuals in multiple tumor settings treated outside of clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched articles, including prospective cohort studies, observational or retrospective series, or expanded access programs, published in English from 2010 to October 2020 in PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. We excluded hematological malignancies.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies met the predefined criteria and were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. We included 5524 patients. The pooled median overall survival was 8.9 (95% CI 7.3-10.5) and 14.3 (95% CI 11.3-17) months for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC: n = 17 studies; 95% in pretreated setting) and melanoma, respectively (n = 3). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 (95% CI 2.7-3.8) and 7.9 (95% CI 6.05-9.78) months for NSCLC and melanoma cohorts. Pooled rates of Grade 1-5 hepatitis, pneumonitis, hypothyroidism, and diarrhea were 5.3% (95% CI 3.7-7.6), 6% (95% CI 3.8-9.4), 8.3% (95% CI 5.4-12.5) and 7.6% (95% CI 5.7-10), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ICIs could be safely administered in older individuals with comparable survival outcomes with respect to younger individuals. Future studies should include some form of geriatric assessment to improve patient stratification.

Immunotherapy Use in Patients With Lung Cancer and Comorbidities

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is now in widespread clinical use for the treatment of lung cancer. Although patients with autoimmune disease and other comorbidities were excluded from initial clinical trials, emerging real-world experience suggests that these promising treatments may be administered safely to individuals with inactive low-risk autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis, mild to moderate renal and hepatic dysfunction, and certain chronic viral infections. Considerations for ICI in autoimmune disease populations include exacerbations of the underlying autoimmune disease, increased risk of ICI-induced immune-related adverse events, and potential for compromised efficacy if patients are receiving chronic immunosuppression. Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in higher-risk autoimmune conditions, such as myasthenia gravis or multiple sclerosis, requires careful evaluation on a case-by-case basis. Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in individuals with solid organ transplant carries a substantial risk of organ rejection. Ongoing research into the prediction of ICI efficacy and toxicity may help in patient selection, treatment, and monitoring.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Aged

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Large phase III trials have established the benefit of checkpoint blockade across multiple tumor types, but patient representation is limited in some subgroups including the aged population. There are several changes in the immune system that occur with age (termed immunosenescence) that could potentially limit efficacy in aged populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the concerns stated above, available evidence from prospective trials, retrospective cohorts, and registry data suggest that elderly patients achieve similar benefit with immune checkpoint blockade in comparison to the general population and do not have increased toxicity. However, as patients age, they are at higher risk of developing a decline in multiple physiologic systems (including the immune system) and reduced ability to recover from illness. Clinical evidence shows that patients who have a poor performance status have inferior outcomes and limited clinical benefit from checkpoint blockade. Clinicians should take an individualized approach that accounts for each patient's health status rather than considering age alone when determining who should be offered checkpoint blockade therapy.

Effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with ECOG PS score ≥2 - Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard of care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however their status in patients with poor performance status (PS) is poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in NSCLC patients with PS ≥ 2.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational studies, which reported efficacy and safety data on ICIs in PS ≥ 2 comparing to PS ≤ 1 NSCLC patients. Efficacy endpoints included: Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease-Control Rate (DCR), Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS). Safety endpoint was the incidence of severe (grade≥3) Adverse Events (AE). Random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I². The review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020162668).

FINDINGS

Sixty-seven studies (n = 26,442 patients) were included. In PS ≥ 2 vs. PS ≤ 1 patients, the pooled odds ratios were: for ORR 0.46 (95 %CI: 0.39-0.54, I²:0 %); for DCR 0.39 (95 %CI: 0.33-0.48, I²:50 %) and for AEs 1.12 (95 %CI: 0.84-1.48, I²:39 %). The pooled hazard ratio for PFS was 2.17 (95 %CI: 1.96-2.39, I²:65 %) and for OS was 2.76 (95 %CI: 2.43-3.14, I²:76 %). The safety profile was comparable regardless of the PS status.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with impaired PS status are, on average, twice less likely to achieve a response when exposed to ICIs when compared with representative PS ≤ 1 population. For lung cancer patients treated with ICIs, the impaired PS is not only prognostic, but also predictive for response, while the safety profile is not affected. Prospective randomized studies are indispensable to determine whether poor PS patients derive benefit from ICIs.

Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients with Advanced Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Real-World: Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The benefit of programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy, particularly of nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, in the second-line setting of patients with non-small cell lung cancer has been documented in randomized clinical trials, showing improvements in global survival and in the overall response rate. Nevertheless, patients enrolled in these studies met strict eligibility criteria, allowing for the treatment of patients that do not reflect the broader oncology patient population. Experiences from real-world data are useful in providing further evidence of the benefit of treatment in a wider range of patients, including those underrepresented in clinical trials. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated in everyday practice with these drugs as the second line, and more generally with immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), showing that the efficacy and safety were comparable to those in selected studies. Results may encourage to treat patients excluded from randomized studies.

Abstract

Immunotherapy based on anti PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is the new standard of advanced non-small cell lung cancers. Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab are used in clinical practice. The strict eligibility criteria of clinical trials do not allow researchers to fully represent treatment effects in the patients that will ultimately use these drugs. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these drugs, and more generally of ICIs, as second-line therapy in NSCLC patients in real world practice. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to include original studies published between January 2015 and April 2020. A total of 32 studies was included in the meta-analysis. The overall radiological response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21%, 52%, 3.35 months and 9.98 months, respectively. The results did not change when analysis was adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and age. A unitary increase in the percent of patients with liver and CNS metastases reduced the occurrence of DCR by 7% (p < 0.001) and the median PFS by 2% (p = 0.010), respectively. The meta-analysis showed that the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in everyday practice is comparable to that in clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of Nivolumab in older patients with pretreated lung cancer: A subgroup analysis of the Galician lung cancer group

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab is an anti PD1 immunotherapy drug approved for advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients who previously received at least one prior line of treatment. Older patients are often not represented in clinical trials and drugs with acceptable safety profiles are necessary. We aim to report the efficacy and safety profile of Nivolumab in the real-world older subgroup of the Galician lung cancer group study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 188 advanced NSCLC patients treated with at least one prior therapy. We collected data from patients who were ≥70 years old treated with Nivolumab in second or subsequent lines. Patient characteristics, treatment efficacy (overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate), and safety profile were reported.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients aged ≥70 years were included in the subgroup analysis. The median age was 74.5 years, a high percentage of patients were males (95%), most had a Performance Status of 1 (79%) and only 13% were non-smokers. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (53%), and 18% of patients received 2 or more lines. The median Progression-Free Survival was 7.53 months (CI 4.3-17.3, p = 0.15) and the median Overall Survival was 14.85 months (CI 10.5-20.7, p = 0.44). The objective response rate was 42%. No new adverse events were reported in comparison to a global population.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety profile of Nivolumab in advanced NSCLC patients treated with at least one prior therapy and age ≥70 years old can be overlapped to a global population. Further prospective trials are needed to define and confirm these results.

Nivolumab for Previously Treated Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-Daily Practice versus Clinical Trials

Based on the results of the CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057 studies, nivolumab therapy has become a new standard treatment for both squamous and non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, due to the specific inclusion criteria of these clinical trials, the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in real-world practice were not certain. In general, the real-world results of nivolumab treatment have been consistent with those obtained in clinical trials. Additional analyses of the real-world data have made the identification of prognostic factors possible. Good performance status is the most significant predictor of clinical benefit. Brain metastases, liver metastases, EGFR mutation, malignant pleural effusion, and a high number of metastatic sites were identified as negative prognostic factors. By contrast, a longer time to disease progression (>6 months) from the beginning of prior chemotherapy and an objective response to chemotherapy seem to have positive prognostic value in the case of nivolumab treatment. In terms of patient age, the data are inconclusive. Some blood biomarkers can also be considered significant prognostic factors.