Predicting future cancer incidence by age, race, ethnicity, and sex

Association of Limited Health Literacy With Frailty, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization Among Older Adults With Cancer: The Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation Registry

PURPOSE

Limited health literacy-ability to obtain, process, and understand health information-can hinder communication, access to medical treatment, and identification and management of comorbidities. Older adults have high rates of poor health literacy, but its role in aging-related outcomes among older adults with cancer is understudied.

METHODS

We included 876 older adults age 60 years and older with cancer from the Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation Registry completing self-reported geriatric assessment, including health literacy, at first visit to medical oncology. The exposure was limited health literacy. Outcomes were frailty, physical/mental health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and health care utilization. We used modified Poisson regression to examine the association of exposure on outcomes adjusting for age, race-ethnicity, sex, and cancer type/stage.

RESULTS

Median age at enrollment was 68; 57.8% were male; 20.2% were non-Hispanic Black. The most prevalent cancers were advanced-stage (46.8% stage IV) colorectal (26.9%) and pancreatic (19.0%). Those with limited health literacy were older (70 v 68 years; P < .001), male (63.0% v 55.1%; P = .026), non-Hispanic Black (28.8% v 16.1%; P < .001), ≤high school educated (62.3% v 28.1%; P < .001), and retired/disabled (86.3% v 71.2%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, limited health literacy was associated with higher prevalence of frailty (prevalence ratio [PR], 2.64 [95% CI, 2.15 to 3.26]), impaired physical (PR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.59 to 2.27]) and mental (PR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.76 to 2.47]) HRQOL, and hospitalization in the last year (PR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.48]) versus adequate health literacy.

CONCLUSION

Older adults with cancer and limited health literacy had higher adjusted prevalence of frailty, impaired physical and mental HRQOL, and recent hospitalization. Interventions to address limited health literacy should be explored in this vulnerable and growing cancer population.

The association between social vulnerability index and survival in older adults with gastrointestinal cancers - The CARE Registry

INTRODUCTION

Older adults represent a majority of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer cases. Social determinants of health, such as neighborhood-level social vulnerability index (SVI), are associated with frailty, a predictor of mortality. The association between social vulnerability and survival is understudied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 876 adults ≥60y with GI cancer enrolled in the Cancer & Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) Registry prior to chemotherapy. Exposure was the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's SVI in tertiles. SVI ranks census tracts between 0th and 100th percentile for lowest and highest vulnerability, respectively. Outcome was survival (enrollment to end of follow-up). Associations between SVI and survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Median age of patients was 69y, 58 % were male, 22 % were non-Hispanic Black, 30 % had colorectal, 29 % had pancreatic cancer, and 70 % had stage III/IV disease. About 44 % of participants died in median 17 months follow-up. Frailty status differed by SVI tertile (tertile 1: 26.8 %; tertile 2: 34.3 %; tertile 3: 43.4 %, p-value: <0.001). Adjusting for age, sex, and cancer type/stage, those living in neighborhoods in the highest SVI tertile had 6 % higher hazard of death (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.8, 1.4) and in the second-highest tertile had 8 % higher hazard of death (95 % CI: 0.9, 1.4) compared to those in the lowest tertile. This association may be driven by the SVI housing characteristics theme [tertile 2: hazard ratio (HR) 1.40 (95 % CI: 1.09, 1.79); tertile 3: HR 1.20 (95 % CI: 0.93, 1.55)].

DISCUSSION

We did not find a statistically significant association between SVI and survival among older adults with GI cancers. Prior evidence of associations between SVI and overall area-level mortality may not reflect individual-level mortality specific to older adults. Prior evidence of associations between SVI and individual-level frailty among older adults with GI cancers suggests SVI may confer greater risk on development of frailty, which could indirectly impact survival. SVI of at-risk areas may need consideration when designing solutions to improve frailty among older adults with GI cancers, which could have a subsequent positive impact on mortality.

"Start low, go slow," a strategy to tailor treatment dosing in older or vulnerable adults with advanced solid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of standard-dose cancer treatment can result in a decline in the functional abilities of older adults with cancer. The "start-low, go-slow" (SLGS) strategy involves initiating cancer treatment at lower-than-standard doses in selected patients who are vulnerable to excess toxicity and escalating based on tolerance. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the available data and the effectiveness of the SLGS strategy in the treatment of cancer in older adults with incurable solid cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review was registered with PROSPERO. Two independent reviewers (GA and TP) conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases (PubMed/Medline, Journal of Geriatric Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology abstracts, and EMBASE) of prospective studies involving patients with solid tumors who received SLGS. SLGS was defined as starting cancer therapy with a lower than standard dose and dose-escalating, if possible. The main objective of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients treated with the SLGS strategy. Secondary objectives were to analyze treatment discontinuation and toxicity in patients treated with the SLGS strategy. Additionally, we aimed to compile a comprehensive report on studies employing the SLGS strategy in solid oncology. We utilized a random-effects meta-analysis model to consider the diversity among patient populations with different cancer stages, types, and treatments. Two researchers independently employed the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality (NOQ) assessment for cohort analysis to evaluate the methodological quality and standard of outcomes reporting in the included studies. The quality of evidence was appraised using the Grading recommendations assessment, development and evaluation GRADE summary of findings tool.

RESULTS

The systematic search identified a total of 12,690 articles. Thirteen studies met criteria for inclusion in the systematic review, totaling 8546 patients. Twelve studies evaluated OS. However, only five studies focused solely on older adults, and the studies involved different types of cancer without following a specific pattern. In meta-analysis of survival among three studies, patients who underwent the SLGS approach had lower mortality (hazar ratio 0.91, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.98, p = 0.01, i2 = 0 %). Toxicity ranged from 5 % to 89 % across studies; SLGS had lower grade 3 and 4 toxicity compared to the standard dose (six studies, meta-analysis relative risk 0.86, 95 % CI 0.75-0.98, p < 0.02, i2 = 30 %). Treatment discontinuation was not different for SLGS vs. standard dose (seven studies, meta-analysis RR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.87-1.05, p = 0.37 i2 = 50 %).

DISCUSSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that a SLGS approach to systemic therapy dosing may reduce toxicity without affecting survival among older patients with solid tumors, although results are limited by a limited number of prospective studies. Additional research is needed to understand better the effects of SLGS in older adults receiving palliative chemotherapy.

Compounding strain: The impact of caregiver strain on health outcomes in older adults with new cancer diagnoses

INTRODUCTION

We sought to examine the association between pre-existing caregiving strain levels and care recipient health outcomes following a new cancer diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) linked with the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) and Medicare claims to identify older adults receiving family caregiving within one year before an index cancer diagnosis. Caregiving strain was determined using NSOC items of self-reported emotional, physical, and financial difficulties measured before the cancer diagnosis. We used care recipient NHATS responses to determine outcomes with the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-2), and self-reported general health pre and post-cancer diagnoses. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine care recipient's health outcomes following cancer diagnosis by previously existing caregiver strain levels.

RESULTS

We identified 584 caregivers who had completed the NSOC items related to caregiving strain and were linked to 404 care recipients whose index cancer diagnoses occurred in the year following the NSOC interview. Care recipients with highly strained caregivers were more likely to report anxiety than recipients with less strained caregivers (33.5 % vs. 22.9 %, p < 0.05). In adjusted models, high strain was associated with increased odds of recipient anxiety (aOR: 2.08, 95 % CI 1.14-3.79). Depressive symptoms and general health outcomes did not differ by caregiver strain in adjusted models.

DISCUSSION

The presence of caregiver strain may contribute to worsening care recipient anxiety following a new cancer diagnosis. Strategically placed caregiver screenings early in the cancer care planning could identify strained caregivers who may benefit from targeted support and training. and support.

CT-Based Body Composition and Frailty as Predictors of Survival Among Older Adults With Gastrointestinal Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Older adults with cancer are at an increased risk of treatment related toxicities and early death. Routinely collected clinico-demographic characteristics inadequately explain this increased risk limiting accurate prognostication. Prior studies have suggested that altered body composition and frailty are independently associated with worse survival among older adults with cancer; however, their combined influence remains unclear.

METHODS

We used data from a single-institution prospective cohort study of older adults (≥ 60 years) who underwent geriatric assessment (GA) at the time of initial consultation with a medical oncologist from September 2017 to December 2020 and available baseline abdominal computed tomography within 60 days of GA. Using multi-slice CT images from T12 to L5 level, we assessed volumetric measures of skeletal muscle (SMV), visceral adipose tissue (VATV), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SATV) and averaged skeletal muscle density (SMD), computing sex-specific z for each measure. Frailty was measured using a 44-item frailty index using the deficit accumulation approach. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) defined as time from GA to death or last follow up. We used multivariable Cox regression model to study the independent association between the above four body composition measurements and OS adjusted for baseline confounders and frailty.

RESULTS

We included 459 patients with a mean age of 69.7 ± 7.5 years, 60% males and 77% non-Hispanic Whites. Most had colorectal (27%) or pancreatic cancer (20%) and 48% had stage IV disease. Over a median follow up of 39.4 months, 209 patients (46%) died. In multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, cancer type, cancer stage and frailty, skeletal muscle volume (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.58-0.96; p = 0.02, per 1 SD increment) was independently associated with OS. The addition of body composition variables to baseline clinico-demographic variables and frailty led to a slightly improved model discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

SMV is independently associated with OS among older adults with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal cancers. Capturing body composition measurements in oncology practice may provide additional prognostic information for older adults with cancer above and beyond what is captured in routine clinical assessment including frailty.

Squaric acid derivatives with cytotoxic activity-a review

3,4-Dihydroxycyclobut-3-ene-1,2-dione (squaric acid, SQ) is the most important representative of the oxocarbon acids family. Squaric acid derivatives can be promising pharmaceutical agents, due to their unique structural properties, from which novel drugs benefit: a planar aromatic ring, the ability to form hydrogen bonds, good reactivity and similarity with carboxylate, phosphate and amide groups. These properties make it suitable for three major applications in cancer treatment. Firstly, due to their excellent ion binding ability, the halogenated squaramides can be used as artificial ion transporters or mobile carriers to disrupt Na+/Cl- gradients in cancer cells, thus hindering lysosomal function and inducing apoptosis. Another advantage of this class is their bioisosteric properties. Such molecules have been reported to be selective inhibitors of HDACs, FAK, SNM1A, MMP and kinases, involved in tumor growth and metastasis. Finally, the cyclobutenedione moiety proves to be a great linker in complex radiopharmaceuticals, used in theranostics. Its aromaticity and good reactivity make the generation and stability of these drugs easy and efficient. Multiple derivatives containing the squamide motif have been the subject of in-vitro investigations and have demonstrated anti-cancer activity in the nanomolar range against tumor cell lines, including colorectal adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, gastric carcinoma and cervical cancer. On the other hand, squaric acid derivative-Navarixin, has already been evaluated in Phase II clinical trials for its potential efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors. In this context this review is the first looking into the potential applications of squaric acid derivatives as anticancer therapies. It analyzes experimental studies presented in articles published between 2000 and 2024.

Financial Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer and Their Caregivers

With advances in cancer treatment, long-term survival rates have improved in recent decades, resulting in extended life expectancies for many patients. This progress brings substantial challenges, however, particularly in terms of the costs associated with cancer care. The financial burden, often considerable, poses difficulties for older adults with cancer and their caregivers. Financial toxicity refers to the unintended financial consequences and distress that patients and families incur from cancer and its treatment. The prevalence of financial toxicity varies (some estimates with over half experiencing this challenge), and certain subgroups (eg, race other than White and those with lack of social support) are at greater risk. Although studies focusing on older adults are limited, existing research has shown that financial toxicity is associated with adverse outcomes, including delayed care, poorer physical, social, and psychological well-being, and lower overall quality of life. Moreover, financial toxicity may result in negative caregiver health outcomes, which can in turn affect patient outcomes. These negative caregiver effects may persist into the bereavement phase. Various methods are available to assess financial toxicity, and they consist of three domains: material, psychological, and behavioral. Available interventions focus on identifying those at risk and providing financial counseling, navigation, and literacy, as well as tangible assistance. Although the impact of financial toxicity is increasingly recognized, studies in older adults and their caregivers are lacking. A better understanding of their needs is important to develop interventions aimed at mitigating financial toxicity in older adults with cancer and their caregivers.

The use of wearable technology in studies in older adults with cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing integration of wearable technology in oncology, its application in the care of older adults, representing most patients with cancer, is poorly defined.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to summarize the current use of wearables in studies in older adults with cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on May 1, 2024. Studies involving wearable devices and patients aged ≥60 years diagnosed with cancer were included. Outcomes reported were study characteristics, wearable outcomes, feasibility and adherence. The mixed method appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 31 publications were included, comprising 1298 older patients. Of these, 12 were pilot/feasibility studies, 12 were observational studies, 6 were randomized controlled trials, and 1 was a cross-sectional study. Most studies used wearable data to measure recovery (19 studies, 61%). Physical activity was the most studied wearable outcome (27 studies, 87%). Adherence to the wearable device was documented in 11 of the 31 studies (35%), with adherence ranging from 74% to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review found wearables were mostly used to measure physical activity, with the most common primary aim of measuring recovery. Most studies reported high adherence, although definitions of adherence were diverse. Our results highlight the need for more and larger studies on wearable technology in older cancer patients, the use of standardized reporting frameworks, and increased participation in research in low- and middle-income countries.

A scoping review of diet and exercise interventions for older cancer survivors' physical function

Lifestyle (diet and exercise) interventions across the cancer care continuum among younger cancer survivors (<60 years of age) demonstrate utility in improving physical function, and other cancer relevant health outcomes. However, the impact of lifestyle interventions on physical function in older (≥60 years) cancer survivors is not entirely clear. This scoping review aims to map and characterize the existing literature on the effect of diet and exercise interventions on physical function in older cancer survivors. Conducted to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported to the PRISMA guidelines, the literature search was performed on multiple databases through March 2024. A total of 19,901 articles were identified for screening with 49 articles published between 2006 and 2024 selected for full-text review. Of these, 36 studies included an exercise intervention, two focused on diet intervention, while 11 studies included both diet and exercise intervention. These 49 studies included various cancer types, cancer stages, and timepoints across the cancer care continuum. Most studies described physical function as their primary outcome and demonstrated maintenance or improvement in physical function. We identified several gaps in the current evidence including lack of (adequately powered) trials focused only on older cancer survivors, and trials focused on dietary interventions alone or dietary interventions combined with exercise interventions within this population vulnerable for nutritional inadequacies and declining physical function. Considering the growing population of older cancer survivors, this represents an important area for further research.

Intrinsic capacity and survival among older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies: The Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation registry

BACKGROUND

Intrinsic capacity (IC) was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a marker of healthy aging, and is defined as the combination of an individual's physical, mental, and psychological capacities. This study aimed to assess IC via a patient-reported geriatric assessment (GA) and evaluate its association with survival among older adults with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

METHODS

Data were used from a single-institution prospective registry of older adults undergoing GA before cancer therapy. Key domains of IC (vitality, locomotion, and sensory [hearing and visual], psychological, and cognitive capacities) were captured via GA, and each was given a score of 0 or 1 (0, impaired) to compute the total IC score (range, 0-6, where 6 indicates no impairment and ≤5 indicates impairment in ≥1 domains). A frailty index (FI) was measured via the deficit accumulation method. Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine the impact of IC impairment on survival.

RESULTS

The study included 665 patients; the median age was 68 years, 57.4% were men, and 72.9% were White. The median IC score was 4, and 79.3% of participants showed impairment in ≥1 domains of IC. Most commonly impaired domains were locomotion (48.7%) and vitality (43.9%). IC was inversely associated with FI (Spearman coefficient, -0.75; p < .001). IC impairment was associated with inferior overall survival (score, 4-5: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.7; 95% CI, 1.11-2.48; score, 2-3: aHR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.30-2.85; score, 0-1: aHR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.11-2.48).

CONCLUSIONS

IC impairment is associated with frailty and reduced overall survival in older patients with GI malignancies. GA can be used to screen for IC impairment as recommended by the WHO.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

The World Health Organization introduced intrinsic capacity as a marker of healthy aging. Intrinsic capacity is the combination of an individual's physical, mental, and psychological capacities. It contains six key domains: vitality, locomotion, and sensory (hearing and visual), psychological, and cognitive capacities. Older adults with cancer are susceptible to a decrease in intrinsic capacity as a result of cancer and the aging process. In this study, we aimed to assess the intrinsic capacity for patients with gastrointestinal cancer and also identify whether there exists any association of intrinsic capacity with overall survival. We identified that approximately 80% of this population had one or more impaired domains, and more intrinsic capacity impairment was associated with reduced overall survival.

The association between social vulnerability and geriatric assessment impairments among older adults with gastrointestinal cancers-The CARE Registry

BACKGROUND

Older adults comprise the majority of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Geriatric assessments (GAs) are recommended for older adults with cancer in part to detect aging-related impairments (e.g., frailty) associated with early mortality. Social factors like social vulnerability may also influence aging-related impairments. However, the association between social vulnerability and aging outcomes among older adults with cancer is understudied.

METHODS

The authors included 908 older adults aged 60 years and older who were recently diagnosed with GI cancer undergoing GA at their first prechemotherapy visit to the University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology clinic. The primary exposure of interest was the social vulnerability index (SVI). Outcomes were frailty (frail vs. robust/prefrail) and total number of GA impairments (range, 0-13). The authors examined the association between SVI and outcomes using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation and generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

The median age at GA was 69 years (interquartile range, 64-75 years), 58.2% of patients were male, 22.6% were non-Hispanic Black, 29.1% had colorectal cancer, 28.2% had pancreatic cancer, and 70.3% had stage III/IV disease. Adjusting for age, sex, cancer type, and disease stage, each decile increase in the SVI was associated with an 8% higher prevalence of frailty (prevalence ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.11) and a 4% higher average count of total GA impairments (risk ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.06). The results were attenuated after further adjustment for race and education.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater social vulnerability was associated with a higher prevalence of frailty and an increasing average number of GA impairments among older adults with GI cancers before systemic treatment. Intervening on social vulnerability may be a target for improving the risk of frailty and GA impairments, but associations of race and education should be further evaluated.

Structure-Activity Relationship Investigations Probing the Cytotoxicity of 9-Aminoacridines Derivatives with PC3 and A549

9-Aminoacridine structures hold much potential for accessing small molecule therapeutics. This core is present in a range of pharmaceuticals for the treatment of ailments such as malaria, inflammation, viral and bacterial infections, and cancer. For the latter, there remains a need to develop and/or improve chemotherapeutics to counteract issues of uptake, drug resistance, and selectivity for cancer cells over healthy cells. In the design of molecules to address these issues, identifying structural units that present as promising leads for drug developments is key. In this study, four 9-aminoacridine derivatives under consideration as precursors for a drug design project are assessed for their cytotoxicity with representative cell lines PC3 and A549, and for their leadlikeness with SwissADME. Together, the cytotoxicity and in silico investigations coalesce around the same derivative as the most promising lead.

Molecular genetic investigation of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients in the Southern Transdanubian region: widening the mutation spectrum and searching for new pathogenic variants using next-generation methods

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is a well-known genetic condition, inherited mainly in an autosomal dominant way, which elevates the risk of developing malignancies at a young age in heterozygous carriers. Advances in new generation sequencing have enabled medical professionals to determine whether a patient is harbouring mutations in moderate- or high penetrance susceptibility genes. We conducted a retrospective analysis among 275 patients who underwent genetic counselling and multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in our department. From these patients 74.5% (205/275) were affected by some type of malignancy, while the remaining 25.5% (70/275) had a positive family history of different cancers, suggesting a genetic predisposition. These tests confirmed a genetic variant in 29.8% and 28.6% of these patient groups respectively. The results also mirrored our general knowledge concerning the genetic background of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, as variants in either one of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes proved to be the most common cause among our patients with 41.5%. Our test also detected a novel mutation in the CDH1 gene and three patients with double heterozygosity in two different susceptibility genes. This study demonstrates the relevance of genetic counselling and non-BRCA gene sequencing among cancer patients and patients who fulfil the criteria for genetic testing, while also providing important details about the genetic profile of Hungarian patients.

Geriatric Oncology: A 5-Year Strategic Plan

The increasing rate of the older adult population across the world over the next 20 years along with significant developments in the treatment of oncology will require a more granular understanding of the older adult population with cancer. The ASCO Geriatric Oncology Community of Practice (COP) herein provides an outline for the field along three fundamental pillars: education, research, and implementation, inspired by ASCO's 5-Year Strategic Plan. Fundamental to improving the understanding of geriatric oncology is research that intentionally includes older adults with clinically meaningful data supported by grants across all career stages. The increased knowledge base that is developed should be conveyed among health care providers through core competencies for trainees and continuing education for practicing oncologists. ASCO's infrastructure can serve as a resource for fellowship programs interested in acquiring geriatric oncology content and provide recommendations on developing training pathways for fellows interested in pursuing formalized training in geriatrics. Incorporating geriatric oncology into everyday practice is challenging as each clinical setting has unique operational workflows with barriers that limit implementation of valuable geriatric tools such as Geriatric Assessment. Partnerships among experts in quality improvement from the ASCO Geriatric Oncology COP, the Cancer and Aging Research Group, and ASCO's Quality Training Program can provide one such venue for implementation of geriatric oncology through a structured support mechanism. The field of geriatric oncology must continue to find innovative strategies using existing resources and partnerships to address the pressing needs of the older adult population with cancer to improve patient outcomes.

The association between food access and frailty among older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies-The CARE Registry

BACKGROUND

Food access is associated with higher gastrointestinal (GI) cancer mortality; however, its association with frailty, which is a predictor of premature mortality among older adults with cancer, is less understood.

METHODS

The authors included 880 adults aged 60 years and older who were recently diagnosed with GI cancers and were undergoing self-reported geriatric assessment at their first prechemotherapy visit to the University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology clinic. Food access was measured using the 2019 US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service designation low-income, low-access (LILA), classifying census tracts based on income and/or access to food stores at various distances. The primary outcome was frailty on the CARE (Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation) Frailty Index, a composite of the proportion of impaired geriatric assessment measures. The authors examined the LILA-frailty association with modified Poisson regression accounting for census-tract clustering.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 69 years, 58.1% were men, 22.5% were non-Hispanic Black, 29.2% had colorectal cancer, 28.0% had pancreatic cancer, 70.1% presented with stage III/IV disease, and 34.9% were frail. A higher proportion in LILA areas were non-Hispanic Black (44.1% vs. 10.8%; p < .001) and had less education (high school or less: 48.1% vs. 37.9%; p = .020). Adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, sex, cancer type and stage, and education, an LILA designation was associated with 58% greater odds of worsening frailty status (95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.12). An analysis of LILA subcategories revealed that associations were maintained across all LILA measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor food access was associated with a greater risk of frailty among newly diagnosed older adults with GI cancers before they received systemic treatment. Intervening on local food access, particularly in LILA areas, may be a target for improving rates of frailty and promoting health equity in this population.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Oncological Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Among Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In the USA, approximately half of newly diagnosed patients with GC are 75 years or older. The objective of the current population-based study was to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on the outcomes of elderly patients with locally advanced GC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged > 75 years were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included lymph node (LN) harvest, surgical margin status, and 30-day mortality. To minimize the effect of selection bias on the assessed outcome between the two study groups (NAC versus no NAC), propensity score matching (PSM) was performed.

RESULTS

After PSM, a total of 1958 patients were included in both groups. NAC utilization increased from 2013 to 2019 (21% versus 42.7%, ptrend < 0.001). On pathologic analysis, patients who received NAC were more likely to have ≥ 16 LNs evaluated (NAC 60.1% versus no NAC 55.5%, p = 0.044) and negative resection margins (NAC 88.6% versus no NAC 83%, p = 0.001). Patients who received NAC were also less likely to experience 30-day mortality following resection (NAC 4.1% versus no NAC 7.1%). Receipt of NAC was associated with improved 1-year (73.9% versus 68.3%), 3-year (48.2% versus 43.5%), and 5-year OS (36.9% versus 30.5%) compared with patients who underwent upfront surgery (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Receipt of NAC was associated with improved oncological outcomes among elderly patients undergoing resection for locally advanced GC.

Restricted life-space mobility impacts physical but not mental quality of life in older cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Older cancer survivors often value quality of life (QOL) over survival. Life-space mobility (LSM), defined as the individual's spatial geographic mobility range, is an important QOL indicator in older adults with chronic illnesses; however, this relationship is unexplored in older cancer survivors.

METHODS

We examined the longitudinal associations and causal relationships between LSM and QOL in 153 older cancer survivors (≥65 years) from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Study of Aging. LSM was assessed using the UAB Life-Space Assessment-Composite score (LSA-C), and QOL was assessed by the SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS12) and Physical Component Score (PCS12) at 0 (study entry), 6, 18, 36, 54, and 72 months. We examined the causal relationship between LSM and QOL using a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM).

RESULTS

The cohort (n = 153) was 76 years old on average and predominantly White (58%), female (58%), and married (55%). Longitudinal analyses found LSM decreased over time (p < 0.0001), and this decrease was associated with decreased QOL (PCS12, p < 0.0001, MCS12, p < 0.0001). In the CLPM causal analysis, lower LSM resulted in worse PCS12 (p < 0.001), but not worse MSC12.

CONCLUSIONS

Restricted LSM resulted in worse physical QOL over 72 months in a sample of 153 older cancer survivors. Developing and evaluating interventions to preserve greater LSM could be a promising approach to improving QOL.

Management of Older Adults With Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Geriatric Assessment

Older adults share a growing burden of cancer morbidity and mortality. This is present across the spectrum of oncologic diagnoses and is particularly true with colorectal cancer (CRC), where older adults continue to share the burden of diagnoses. However, optimal cancer treatment decision making in older adults remains a significant challenge, as the majority of previous clinical trials shaping the current treatment landscape have focused on younger patients, often with more robust performance status and fewer medical comorbid conditions. The heterogeneous aging process of older adults with CRC necessitates a personalized treatment approach, as approximately three-quarters of older adults with CRC also have a concominant geriatric syndrome and more than half of older adults with CRC are pre-frail or frail. Treatment decisions shoud be multifaceted, including consultation with the patient and their familes regarding their wishes, with consideration of the patient's quality of life, functional status, medical comorbid conditions, social support, and treatment toxicity risk. Geriatric assessment is a systematic and validated approach to assess an older adults's potential strengths and vulnerabilities, which can in turn be used to assist with comprehensive cancer care planning and support. In this review, we will summarize current treatment approaches for older adults with CRC, with a particular focus on the incorporation of the geriatric assessment.

Relationships between Anxiety, Depression, and Illness Perceptions in Lung and Breast Cancer Patients throughout the Cancer Continuum

Cancer is a devastating disease that has significant psychological and biological impacts. Generally, lung cancer primarily affects men while breast cancer primarily affects women. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the levels of anxiety and depression in patients with these prevalent cancer types, as well as their perceptions of the illness and any potential connections between them. The study included a total of 252 participants, consisting of 110 breast cancer patients, 112 lung cancer patients, and 30 healthy individuals as controls. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were administered to assess mood, while the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) was used to evaluate cancer perceptions. Results revealed that both breast cancer and lung cancer patients had significantly higher BDI and BAI scores compared to the control group. Furthermore, the BDI and BAI scores were lower in breast cancer patients compared to lung cancer patients. The IPQ causal representation-immunity score was significantly higher in lung cancer patients than in breast cancer patients (p = 0.01). Positive correlations were found between BDI scores and BAI scores, as well as between BDI scores and certain subscale scores of the IPQ related to illness representation and causal representation. Additionally, a positive correlation was observed between BAI scores and the IPQ illness representation-timeline acute/chronic subscale, while a negative correlation was found between BAI scores and the IPQ causal representation-accident or chance scores. Overall, the study findings demonstrated that breast and lung cancer patients possess negative perceptions of their disease and experience high levels of anxiety and depression. To enhance the quality of life and promote resilience in these patients, it is recommended to incorporate psychological interventions that consider anxiety, depression, and disease perception.

Differential treatment effect between younger and older adults for new cancer therapies in solid tumors supporting US Food and Drug Administration approval between 2010 and 2021

BACKGROUND

Over one half of cancer diagnoses occur in patients aged 65 and older. The authors quantified how treatment effects differ between older and younger patients in oncology registration trials.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of registration trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration approval of cancer drugs (from January 2010 to December 2021). The primary outcome was differential treatment effect by age (younger than 65 years vs. 65 years or older) for progression-free survival and overall survival. Random effects meta-analysis and a pairwise comparison of outcomes by age group also were performed.

RESULTS

Among 263 trials that met the inclusion criteria, 120 trials with 153 end points and 83,152 patients presented age-specific outcome data. Among the included randomized patients, 38% were aged 65 years and older compared with an incidence proportion of 55% in data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Studies evaluating prostate cancer had the highest representation of patients aged 65 years or older (73%), whereas breast cancer studies had the lowest (20%). There were no changes in the proportion of patients aged 65 years or older over time (p = .86). Only 7% of end points showed a statistically significant interaction between outcome and age group. In a pooled analysis, there was an association between treatment effect and age for progression-free survival that approached but did not meet significance (hazard ratio, 0.95; p = .06), and there was no difference for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.97; p = .79).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults remain under-represented in oncology registration trials. Significant differences in outcomes by age group were uncommon in individual trials and pooled analyses. However, clinical trial participants differ from real-world patients older than 65 years, and increased enrollment and ongoing research into differential treatment effects by age are needed.

Association of unmet basic resource needs with frailty and quality of life among older adults with cancer-Results from the CARE registry

BACKGROUND

Basic resource needs related to transportation, housing, food, and medications are important social determinants of health and modifiable indicators of poverty, but their role in modifying the risk of frailty and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains unknown. The goal of our study was to examine the prevalence of unmet basic needs and their association with frailty and HRQoL in a cohort of older adults with cancer.

METHODS

The CARE registry prospectively enrolls older adults (≥60 years) with cancer. Assessments of transportation, housing, and material hardship were added to the CARE tool in 8/2020. The 44-item CARE Frailty Index was used to define frailty, and subdomains of physical and mental HRQoL were assessed using the PROMIS® 10-global. Multivariable analysis examined the association between unmet needs with frailty and HRQoL subdomains, adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

The cohort included 494 participants. Median age of 69 years, 63.6% were male and 20.2% were Non-Hispanic (NH) Black. Unmet basic needs were reported in 17.8% (transportation 11.5%, housing 2.8%, and material hardship 7.5%). Those with unmet needs were more often NH Black (33.0% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.006) and less educated (

CONCLUSIONS

Unmet basic needs represent a novel exposure that is independently associated with frailty and low HRQoL and warrants the development of targeted interventions.

Collapse

Key Words

• aging
• basic resource needs
• cancer
• concrete resource needs
• frailty
• geriatric oncology

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Male
• Aged
• Female
• Quality of Life
• Frailty/epidemiology
• Neoplasms/epidemiology
• Neoplasms/therapy
• Ethnicity
• Registries

Collapse

Grants

• K08 CA234225 NCI NIH HHS
• T32 HS013852 AHRQ HHS
• Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
• National Cancer Institute

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Grant R. Williams Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Mackenzie Fowler Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Smith Giri Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Chen Dai Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Christian Harmon Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Mustafa Al‐Obaidi Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Coryn Stephenson University of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
Kira Bona Division of Population SciencesDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
Wendy Landier Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Smita Bhatia Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
Julie Wolfson Institute for Cancer Outcomes & SurvivorshipUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse