1
|
Hrabal I, Aliabadi E, Reiche S, Weber S, Holicki CM, Schmid L, Fast C, Schröder C, Gutjahr B, Behrendt P, Groschup MH, Eiden M. Therapeutic treatment of hepatitis E virus infection in pigs with a neutralizing monoclonal antibody. Sci Rep 2025; 15:10795. [PMID: 40155491 PMCID: PMC11953370 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-95992-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) poses a significant risk to human health. In Europe, the majority of HEV infection are caused by the zoonotic genotype 3 (HEV-3), which can cause chronic hepatitis E in immunocompromised patients and those with pre-existing liver disease, and may eventually develop into fatal liver cirrhosis. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of a monoclonal antibody (MAb) treatment strategy using a well established HEV-3 pig model with intravenous infection. For this purpose, nine MAbs raised against the viral capsid protein were generated and the neutralizing activities were compared using in vitro assays. The antibody with the highest neutralizing activity, MAb 5F6A1, was selected for an in vivo study in pigs infected with HEV-3. Following the initial infection of pigs with HEV-3, MAb 5F6A1 was administered intravenously one and seven days post-infection. The results suggest MAb 5F6A1 significantly reduced viremia and virus shedding in pigs infected with HEV-3. This study provides significant insight into the dynamics of HEV infection in pigs and highlights the efficacy of MAb based therapy as an option for treating HEV in porcine hosts and, potentially, humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Hrabal
- Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Elmira Aliabadi
- Institute for Experimental Virology, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, TWINCORE, Hannover, Germany
- Helmholz Center for Infection Research GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Sven Reiche
- Department of Experimental Animal Facilities and Biorisk Management, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Saskia Weber
- Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Cora M Holicki
- Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
- Department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Schmid
- Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Virology and Cell Biology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Christine Fast
- Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Charlotte Schröder
- Department of Experimental Animal Facilities and Biorisk Management, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Benjamin Gutjahr
- Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Patrick Behrendt
- Institute for Experimental Virology, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, TWINCORE, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research, Partner site Braunschweig-Hannover, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Martin H Groschup
- Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research, Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
| | - Martin Eiden
- Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
|
3
|
State of the Art, Unresolved Issues, and Future Research Directions in the Fight against Hepatitis C Virus: Perspectives for Screening, Diagnostics of Resistances, and Immunization. J Immunol Res 2016; 2016:1412840. [PMID: 27843956 PMCID: PMC5098088 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1412840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Revised: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) still represents a major public health threat, with a dramatic burden from both epidemiological and clinical points of view. New generation of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has been recently introduced in clinical practice promising to cure HCV and to overcome the issues related to the interferon-based therapies. However, the emergence of drug resistance and the suboptimal activity of DAAs therapies against diverse HCV genotypes have been observed, determining treatment failure and hampering an effective control of HCV spread worldwide. Moreover, these treatments remain poorly accessible, particularly in low-income countries. Finally, effective screening strategy is crucial to early identifying and treating all HCV chronically infected patients. For all these reasons, even though new drugs may contribute to impacting HCV spread worldwide a preventive HCV vaccine remains a cornerstone in the road to significantly reduce the HCV spread globally, with the ultimate goal of its eradication. Advances in molecular vaccinology, together with a strong financial, political, and societal support, will enable reaching this fundamental success in the coming years. In this comprehensive review, the state of the art about these major topics in the fight against HCV and the future of research in these fields are discussed.
Collapse
|
4
|
Corti D, Kearns JD. Promises and pitfalls for recombinant oligoclonal antibodies-based therapeutics in cancer and infectious disease. Curr Opin Immunol 2016; 40:51-61. [PMID: 26995095 PMCID: PMC7127534 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2016.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Revised: 02/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of many human diseases and the application of combinations of mAbs has demonstrated improved therapeutic activity in both preclinical and clinical testing. Combinations of antibodies have several advantages such as the capacities to target multiple and mutating antigens in complex pathogens and to engage varied epitopes on multiple disease-related antigens (e.g. receptors) to overcome heterogeneity and plasticity. Oligoclonal antibodies are an emerging therapeutic format in which a novel antibody combination is developed as a single drug product. Here, we will provide historical context on the use of oligoclonal antibodies in oncology and infectious diseases and will highlight practical considerations related to their preclinical and clinical development programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey D Kearns
- Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., One Kendall Square, Suite B7201, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Desombere I, Fafi-Kremer S, Van Houtte F, Pessaux P, Farhoudi A, Heydmann L, Verhoye L, Cole S, McKeating JA, Leroux-Roels G, Baumert TF, Patel AH, Meuleman P. Monoclonal anti-envelope antibody AP33 protects humanized mice against a patient-derived hepatitis C virus challenge. Hepatology 2016; 63:1120-34. [PMID: 26710081 PMCID: PMC7613414 DOI: 10.1002/hep.28428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2015] [Revised: 12/04/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED End-stage liver disease (ESLD) caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major indication for liver transplantation. However, immediately after transplantation, the liver graft of viremic patients universally becomes infected by circulating virus, resulting in accelerated liver disease progression. Currently available direct-acting antiviral therapies have reduced efficacy in patients with ESLD and prophylactic strategies to prevent HCV recurrence are still highly needed. In this study, we compared the ability of two broadly reactive monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), designated 3/11 and AP33, recognizing a distinct, but overlapping, epitope in the viral E2 glycoprotein to protect humanized mice from a patient-derived HCV challenge. Their neutralizing activity was assessed using the HCV pseudoparticles and cell-culture-derived HCV systems expressing multiple patient-derived envelopes and a human-liver chimeric mouse model. HCV RNA was readily detected in all control mice challenged with a patient-derived HCV genotype 1b isolate, whereas 3 of 4 AP33-treated mice were completely protected. In contrast, only one of four 3/11-treated mice remained HCV-RNA negative throughout the observation period, whereas the other 3 had a viral load that was indistinguishable from that in the control group. The increased in vivo efficacy of AP33 was in line with its higher affinity and neutralizing capacity observed in vitro. CONCLUSIONS Although mAbs AP33 and 3/11 target the same region in E2, only mAb AP33 can efficiently protect from challenge with a heterologous HCV population in vivo. Given that mAb AP33 efficiently neutralizes viral variants that escaped the humoral immune response and reinfected the liver graft of transplant patients, it may be a valuable candidate to prevent HCV recurrence. In addition, our data are valuable for the design of a prophylactic vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samira Fafi-Kremer
- Inserm U1110, Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies Virales et Hépatiques,Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France,Laboratoire de Virologie
| | | | - Patrick Pessaux
- Inserm U1110, Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies Virales et Hépatiques,Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France,Laboratoire de Virologie
| | - Ali Farhoudi
- Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Laura Heydmann
- Inserm U1110, Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies Virales et Hépatiques,Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lieven Verhoye
- Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sarah Cole
- MRC – University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jane A. McKeating
- Viral Hepatitis Research Group, Centre for Human Virology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Thomas F. Baumert
- Inserm U1110, Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies Virales et Hépatiques,Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France,Laboratoire de Virologie,corresponding authors; Contact information: Prof. Philip Meuleman, PhD, Center for Vaccinology - Ghent University, University Hospital Ghent, Building A, 1st floor, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium, Phone: +32 (0)9 332 02 05 (direct); Phone: +32 (0)9 332 36 58 (office administrator), Fax: +32 (0)9 332 63 11; , Thomas F. Baumert: , Arvind H. Patel:
| | - Arvind H. Patel
- MRC – University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK,corresponding authors; Contact information: Prof. Philip Meuleman, PhD, Center for Vaccinology - Ghent University, University Hospital Ghent, Building A, 1st floor, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium, Phone: +32 (0)9 332 02 05 (direct); Phone: +32 (0)9 332 36 58 (office administrator), Fax: +32 (0)9 332 63 11; , Thomas F. Baumert: , Arvind H. Patel:
| | - Philip Meuleman
- Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium,corresponding authors; Contact information: Prof. Philip Meuleman, PhD, Center for Vaccinology - Ghent University, University Hospital Ghent, Building A, 1st floor, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium, Phone: +32 (0)9 332 02 05 (direct); Phone: +32 (0)9 332 36 58 (office administrator), Fax: +32 (0)9 332 63 11; , Thomas F. Baumert: , Arvind H. Patel:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schweitzer CJ, Liang TJ. Border Control in Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Inhibiting Viral Entry. ACS Infect Dis 2015; 1:416-9. [PMID: 27617924 DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A new era has begun in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with powerful yet expensive therapies. New treatments are emerging that target the entry step of HCV and could potentially block reinfection after liver transplant. These treatments include antibodies, which target the virus or host receptors required by HCV. Additionally, several new and previously approved small-molecule compounds have been described that target unique aspects of HCV entry. Overall, the blocking entry represents an attractive strategy that could yield powerful combination therapies to combat HCV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J. Schweitzer
- Liver Diseases
Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
(NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
| | - T. Jake Liang
- Liver Diseases
Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
(NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Drummer HE. Editorial on "Broadly neutralizing antibodies abrogate established hepatitis C virus infection" published in Science Translational Medicine on 17th September 2014. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2015; 3:S6. [PMID: 26046093 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a blood borne pathogen that causes chronic liver disease and afflicts 170 million people world-wide. While direct acting antivirals now provide a highly effective means to cure those infected with HCV, there is no vaccine to prevent infection. Published in Science Translational Medicine, de Jong et al. [2014] show that highly potent neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) directed to one of the surface glycoproteins of HCV, E2, can not only prevent infection but can also eliminate established infection in experimental animal models of HCV. They provide compelling evidence that for HCV to maintain a chronic infection, it must infect new hepatocytes; infection cannot be sustained in reservoirs of infected cells alone and that E2-specific NAbs are sufficient to cure an infection. In addition, the manuscript further supports the importance of NAbs in preventing, controlling and possibly curing HCV. Thus NAbs are not only essential to the development of prophylactic vaccines but may yet have a role in therapeutic approaches to HCV treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi E Drummer
- Viral Fusion Laboratory, Centre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kong L, Jackson KN, Wilson IA, Law M. Capitalizing on knowledge of hepatitis C virus neutralizing epitopes for rational vaccine design. Curr Opin Virol 2015; 11:148-57. [PMID: 25932568 PMCID: PMC4507806 DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2015.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus infects nearly 3% of the world's population and is often referred as a silent epidemic. It is a leading cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in endemic countries. Although antiviral drugs are now available, they are not readily accessible to marginalized social groups and developing nations that are disproportionally impacted by HCV. To stop the HCV pandemic, a vaccine is needed. Recent advances in HCV research have provided new opportunities for studying HCV neutralizing antibodies and their subsequent use for rational vaccine design. It is now recognized that neutralizing antibodies to conserved antigenic sites of the virus can cross-neutralize diverse HCV genotypes and protect against infection in vivo. Structural characterization of the neutralizing epitopes has provided valuable information for design of candidate immunogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leopold Kong
- Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Kelli N Jackson
- Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Ian A Wilson
- Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Mansun Law
- Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Structural and antigenic definition of hepatitis C virus E2 glycoprotein epitopes targeted by monoclonal antibodies. Clin Dev Immunol 2013; 2013:450963. [PMID: 23935648 PMCID: PMC3722892 DOI: 10.1155/2013/450963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2013] [Accepted: 06/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major cause of chronic liver disease as well as the major indication for liver transplantation worldwide. Current standard of care is not completely effective, not administrable in grafted patients, and burdened by several side effects. This incomplete effectiveness is mainly due to the high propensity of the virus to continually mutate under the selective pressure exerted by the host immune response as well as currently administered antiviral drugs. The E2 envelope surface glycoprotein of HCV (HCV/E2) is the main target of the host humoral immune response and for this reason one of the major variable viral proteins. However, broadly cross-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against HCV/E2 represent a promising tool for the study of virus-host interplay as well as for the development of effective prophylactic and therapeutic approaches. In the last few years many anti-HCV/E2 mAbs have been evaluated in preclinical and clinical trials as possible candidate antivirals, particularly for administration in pre- and post-transplant settings. In this review we summarize the antigenic and structural characteristics of HCV/E2 determined through the use of anti-HCV/E2 mAbs, which, given the absence of a crystal structure of this glycoprotein, represent currently the best tool available.
Collapse
|
10
|
Scheel TKH, Rice CM. Understanding the hepatitis C virus life cycle paves the way for highly effective therapies. Nat Med 2013; 19:837-49. [PMID: 23836234 PMCID: PMC3984536 DOI: 10.1038/nm.3248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 421] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2013] [Accepted: 05/28/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
More than two decades of intense research has provided a detailed understanding of hepatitis C virus (HCV), which chronically infects 2% of the world's population. This effort has paved the way for the development of antiviral compounds to spare patients from life-threatening liver disease. An exciting new era in HCV therapy dawned with the recent approval of two viral protease inhibitors, used in combination with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin; however, this is just the beginning. Multiple classes of antivirals with distinct targets promise highly efficient combinations, and interferon-free regimens with short treatment duration and fewer side effects are the future of HCV therapy. Ongoing and future trials will determine the best antiviral combinations and whether the current seemingly rich pipeline is sufficient for successful treatment of all patients in the face of major challenges, such as HCV diversity, viral resistance, the influence of host genetics, advanced liver disease and other co-morbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troels K H Scheel
- Laboratory of Virology and Infectious Disease, Center for Study of Hepatitis C, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Safety and anti-HCV effect of prolonged intravenous silibinin in HCV genotype 1 subjects in the immediate liver transplant period. J Hepatol 2013; 58:421-6. [PMID: 23073223 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2012] [Revised: 10/01/2012] [Accepted: 10/08/2012] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Reinfection of the graft is the rule in patients with HCV cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation, and HCV-RNA reaches pre-transplantation levels within the first month. Short-term intravenous silibinin monotherapy is safe and shows a potent in vivo anti-HCV effect. We aimed at evaluating the safety and antiviral effect of prolonged intravenous silibinin, started immediately before liver transplantation. METHODS Single centre, prospective, pilot study, to assess the safety and effect on HCV-RNA kinetics during at least 21 days of intravenous silibinin monotherapy (20 mg/kg/day) in 9 consecutive HCV genotype 1 subjects, in comparison to a control, non-treated group of 7 consecutive prior transplanted subjects under the same immunosuppressive regimen (basiliximab, steroids, delayed tacrolimus, micophenolate). RESULTS Intravenous silibinin led to significant, maintained and progressive HCV-RNA decreases (mean HCV-RNA drop at week 3, -4.1 ± 1.3 log(10)IU/ml), and lack of viral breakthrough during administration. Four patients (44%) reached negative HCV-RNA, maintained during silibinin treatment, vs. none in the control group, but HCV-RNA relapsed in all of them after a median of 21 days (16-28), following silibinin withdrawal. Partial responders to silibinin showed marked decreases in HCV-RNA when compared to controls, but lower than complete responders. There were no clinical adverse effects, and silibinin led to asymptomatic transient hyperbilirubinemia (week 2, 4.2 ± 2.2 vs. 2.5 ± 3.6 mg/dl; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Prolonged intravenous silibinin monotherapy was safe in the immediate liver transplantation period, leading to a potent and time dependent antiviral effect and lack of HCV-RNA breakthrough during administration. However, HCV-RNA rebounded after withdrawal, and silibinin monotherapy did not avoid reinfection of the graft.
Collapse
|
13
|
Vercauteren K, Leroux-Roels G, Meuleman P. Blocking HCV entry as potential antiviral therapy. Future Virol 2012. [DOI: 10.2217/fvl.12.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
14
|
Di Lorenzo C, Angus AGN, Patel AH. Hepatitis C virus evasion mechanisms from neutralizing antibodies. Viruses 2011; 3:2280-2300. [PMID: 22163345 PMCID: PMC3230852 DOI: 10.3390/v3112280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2011] [Revised: 10/28/2011] [Accepted: 11/07/2011] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) represents a major public health problem, affecting 3% of the world's population. The majority of infected individuals develop chronic hepatitis, which can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. To date, a vaccine is not available and current therapy is limited by resistance, adverse effects and high costs. Although it is very well established that cell-mediated immunity is necessary for viral clearance, the importance of host antibodies in clearing HCV infection is being increasingly recognized. Indeed, recent studies indicate that neutralizing antibodies are induced in the early phase of infection by patients who subsequently clear viral infection. Conversely, patients who do not clear the virus develop high titers of neutralizing antibodies during the chronic stage. Surprisingly, these antibodies are not able to control HCV infection. HCV has therefore developed mechanisms to evade immune elimination, allowing it to persist in the majority of infected individuals. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which the virus escapes immune surveillance is therefore necessary if novel preventive and therapeutic treatments have to be designed. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the mechanisms used by HCV to evade host neutralizing antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Di Lorenzo
- MRC - University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Church Street, Glasgow, G11 5JR, UK; E-Mails: (C.D.L.); (A.G.N.A.)
| | - Allan G. N. Angus
- MRC - University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Church Street, Glasgow, G11 5JR, UK; E-Mails: (C.D.L.); (A.G.N.A.)
| | - Arvind H. Patel
- MRC - University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Church Street, Glasgow, G11 5JR, UK; E-Mails: (C.D.L.); (A.G.N.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Therapies in addition to the direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) under evaluation for chronic hepatitis C include host targets such as cyclophilin inhibitors and immunomodulators. Both passive and therapeutic vaccines hold promise for the future. Although the numbers of drug categories and individual agents are increasing, only a handful of the non-DAAs seem to be ready to move on to phase III trials. New interferon agents are in development, and ribavirin variants are still under consideration. The role of the other players in the overall armamentarium against hepatitis C virus is still evolving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ahn
- Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Angus AGN, Patel AH. Immunotherapeutic potential of neutralizing antibodies targeting conserved regions of the HCV envelope glycoprotein E2. Future Microbiol 2011; 6:279-94. [PMID: 21449840 DOI: 10.2217/fmb.11.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
HCV is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. There is no vaccine available and the current antiviral therapies fail to cure approximately half of treated patients. Liver disease caused by HCV infection is the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation. Unfortunately, reinfection of the new liver is universal and often results in an aggressive form of the disease leading to graft loss and the need for retransplantation. Immunotherapies using antibodies that potently inhibit HCV infection have the potential to control or even prevent graft reinfection. The virion envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2, which are involved in HCV entry into host cells, are the targets of neutralizing antibodies. To date, a number of monoclonal antibodies targeting conserved regions of E2 have been described that display outstanding neutralizing capabilities against HCV infection in both in vitro and in vivo systems. This article will summarize the current literature on these neutralizing anti-E2 antibodies and discuss their potential immunotherapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan G N Angus
- MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Church Street, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Long-lasting protective antiviral immunity induced by passive immunotherapies requires both neutralizing and effector functions of the administered monoclonal antibody. J Virol 2010; 84:10169-81. [PMID: 20610721 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00568-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Using FrCas(E) retrovirus-infected newborn mice as a model system, we have shown recently that a long-lasting antiviral immune response essential for healthy survival emerges after a short treatment with a neutralizing (667) IgG2a isotype monoclonal antibody (MAb). This suggested that the mobilization of adaptive immunity by administered MAbs is key for the success in the long term for the MAb-based passive immunotherapy of chronic viral infections. We have addressed here whether the anti-FrCas(E) protective endogenous immunity is the mere consequence of viral propagation blunting, which would simply give time to the immune system to react, and/or to actual immunomodulation by the MAb during the treatment. To this aim, we have compared viral replication, disease progression, and antiviral immune responses between different groups of infected mice: (i) mice treated with either the 667 MAb, its F(ab')(2) fragment, or an IgM (672) with epitopic specificity similar to that of 667 but displaying different effector functions, and (ii) mice receiving no treatment but infected with a low viral inoculum reproducing the initial viral expansion observed in their infected/667 MAb-treated counterparts. Our data show that the reduction of FrCas(E) propagation is insufficient on its own to induce protective immunity and support a direct immunomodulatory action of the 667 MAb. Interestingly, they also point to sequential actions of the administered MAb. In a first step, viral propagation is exclusively controlled by 667 neutralizing activity, and in a second one, this action is complemented by FcgammaR-binding-dependent mechanisms, which most likely combine infected cell cytolysis and the modulation of the antiviral endogenous immune response. Such complementary effects of administered MAbs must be taken into consideration for the improvement of future antiviral MAb-based immunotherapies.
Collapse
|
18
|
A crucial role for infected-cell/antibody immune complexes in the enhancement of endogenous antiviral immunity by short passive immunotherapy. PLoS Pathog 2010; 6:e1000948. [PMID: 20548955 PMCID: PMC2883599 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2009] [Accepted: 05/10/2010] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Antiviral monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent promising therapeutics. However, most mAbs-based immunotherapies conducted so far have only considered the blunting of viral propagation and not other possible therapeutic effects independent of virus neutralization, namely the modulation of the endogenous immune response. As induction of long-term antiviral immunity still remains a paramount challenge for treating chronic infections, we have asked here whether neutralizing mAbs can, in addition to blunting viral propagation, exert immunomodulatory effects with protective outcomes. Supporting this idea, we report here that mice infected with the FrCasE murine retrovirus on day 8 after birth die of leukemia within 4–5 months and mount a non-protective immune response, whereas those rapidly subjected to short immunotherapy with a neutralizing mAb survive healthy and mount a long-lasting protective antiviral immunity with strong humoral and cellular immune responses. Interestingly, the administered mAb mediates lysis of infected cells through an antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) mechanism. In addition, it forms immune complexes (ICs) with infected cells that enhance antiviral CTL responses through FcγR-mediated binding to dendritic cells (DCs). Importantly, the endogenous antiviral antibodies generated in mAb-treated mice also display the same properties, allowing containment of viral propagation and enhancement of memory cellular responses after disappearance of the administered mAb. Thus, our data demonstrate that neutralizing antiviral mAbs can act as immunomodulatory agents capable of stimulating a protective immunity lasting long after the end of the treatment. They also show an important role of infected-cells/antibody complexes in the induction and the maintenance of protective immunity through enhancement of both primary and memory antiviral T-cell responses. They also indicate that targeting infected cells, and not just viruses, by antibodies can be crucial for elicitation of efficient, long-lasting antiviral T-cell responses. This must be considered when designing antiviral mAb-based immunotherapies. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) constitute the largest class of bio-therapeutic proteins and are increasingly being considered as drugs to fight both acute and chronic severe human viral diseases. Most antiviral mAb-based treatments conducted so far, whether in humans or in animal models, have only considered the blunting of viral propagation through direct virus neutralization. However, mAbs might also operate via complementary mechanisms owing to their ability to interact with various components of the immune system. Using a lethal mouse model of retrovirally-induced leukemia, we report here that a neutralizing mAb administered to infected mice for a short period of time can, in addition to its direct effect on viral spread, induce a strong, long-lasting antiviral immune response protecting mice from disease development long after the end of the treatment. Although the initiation and maintenance of this long-term immunity is multi-factorial, we demonstrate a crucial role for the immune complexes formed between antiviral antibodies and infected cells in this process. Our work reveals a thus far underappreciated vaccine-like effect of antiviral neutralizing mAbs, which will have to be considered for future treatment of life-threatening viral infections.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Liver transplantation is currently the definitive treatment of end-stage liver disease. This article reviews the complex multidisciplinary care of the liver transplant recipient beginning immediately after transplantation but extending into the long term. The presentation, evaluation and treatment of common post-transplant complications are outlined. Importantly, immunosuppression strategies along with the issues of acute and chronic rejection are discussed in detail with an emphasis on how practice has evolved over time. The spectrum of infectious problems is systematically presented, based on the time since transplantation and the institution of immunosuppression. Finally, the substantial challenges of recurrent disease and long-term medical comorbidities are addressed as these are clearly the primary issues that threaten the longevity and wellbeing of the liver transplant recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Gelb
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a large-scale and significant health concern. The combination of subcutaneously administered pegylated interferon and oral ribavirin is the FDA-approved regimen for the treatment of chronic HCV infection. Combination therapy may result in a sustained virologic response leading to HCV eradication, with a reduction in risk for cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the combination of PEG-IFN and ribavirin does not universally result in cure in all patients who undergo treatment. In this article, the authors discuss immunomodulatory therapies and clinical trials in the treatment of HCV infection.
Collapse
|
21
|
Mir HM, Birerdinc A, Younossi ZM. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against the HCV envelope proteins. Clin Liver Dis 2009; 13:477-86. [PMID: 19628163 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2009.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The potential for developing efficient and efficacious therapies for hepatitis C virus continues to improve. Insight into the molecular processes involved in attachment, entry, and fusion suggests that antibodies could potentially inhibit viral replication at any or all of these stages, and the attachment and entry stages present the best target for antibodies that can attack the virus. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies present an important therapeutic option in this area, and this article assesses current investigations of several antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heshaam M Mir
- Center for Liver Diseases, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Despite improvements to treatments for HCV infection, almost half of patients cannot be cured with standard combination therapy (pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin). The HCV life cycle offers a number of potential targets for molecular therapy, and several specifically targeted antiviral therapies for HCV (STAT-Cs) are in preclinical and clinical stages of development. Evidence to date suggests that monotherapy with any antiviral drug is unlikely to eradicate HCV infection. Combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin is necessary for the augmentation of antiviral drug activity and/or prevention of drug resistance. Results from clinical trials carried out in the past few years on STAT-C agents in combination with standard therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin provide great promise of higher rates of sustained virological response and, potentially, shorter duration of therapy than standard therapy alone achieves. Although pegylated interferon and ribavirin are likely to remain a cornerstone of therapeutic regimens in the short term, combinations of antiviral drugs of different classes, possibly along with novel agents that target host factors and modulate viral replication or augment antiviral defenses, offer the eventual possibility of interferon-free regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arema A Pereira
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Center for the Study of Hepatitis C, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Chronic, persistent HCV infection is a public health issue. It often progresses to life-threatening complications, including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The current standard therapy is a combination of pegylated IFN-alpha and ribavirin. This therapy results in a sustained virologic response in only 50% of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and is often accompanied with substantial side-effects. Therefore, it is imperative to develop novel therapies with higher efficacy and less substantial side-effects. Impaired immune responses to HCV are key features of chronic HCV infection; thus, intervention strategies typically involve boosting the immune responses against HCV. These immune-based therapies for chronic HCV infection include therapeutic vaccines, antagonists of T cell inhibitory factors, anti-HCV neutralizing antibodies, cytokines, and agonists for TLRs. Currently, various types of immune-based therapies are under development that might be used as a monotherapy or in combination with other antiviral drugs for the treatment of chronic HCV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Yeop Chang
- Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV. Review article: novel therapeutic options for chronic hepatitis C. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27:866-84. [PMID: 18284651 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03644.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of treatment against hepatitis C virus has improved, but it is still far from ideal. Thus, new antihepatitis C virus therapies are required. AIM To evaluate the data on antihepatitis C virus approaches beyond the current standard combination of pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin. METHOD We reviewed the available literature regarding novel antihepatitis C virus options, given alone or in combination with existing agents. RESULTS New interferons and ribavirin alternatives have been tried aiming to improve the efficacy and the safety/tolerability profile of standard agents. The hepatitis C virus polymerase and NS3/4A protease have been rather popular targets for new antihepatitis C virus agents. The combination of such inhibitors with pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin seems to act synergistically and to prevent viral resistance, compared to monotherapies. Several novel immunomodulators are currently evaluated and may be useful in combination therapies. Alternative strategies (inhibition of hepatitis C virus protein translation, assembly/release or binding) or agents with different modes of action (statins, S-adenosylmethionine and herbs) need further evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Many novel promising antihepatitis C virus agents are being developed, offering hope for future therapies that may target multiple points of the viral life cycle and/or host immune response. Newer approaches should ideally provide safe, effective and more tolerable therapy to all chronic hepatitis C virus patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cholongitas
- Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Sitia, Sitia, Greece.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma occurs in 20% of infected adults. The natural history following childhood infection is less well defined, although cirrhosis in children is described. Since blood product screening for HCV infection was introduced in 1990, most children who acquire HCV do so by vertical transmission from an infected mother. Transmission to offspring occurs in approximately 5%. Most children with HCV infection are asymptomatic. Diagnosis is made by testing those at risk for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and HCV antibody (anti-HCV) by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). The clinical impact of HCV infection is assessed by monitoring symptoms and signs, blood testing of liver enzymes, ultrasound imaging, and by liver biopsy. Improved efficacy and tolerability of treatment strategies in adults have had a significant impact on the management of children with HCV infection. The emphasis is now on promoting awareness, early diagnosis, and treatment. Treatment strategies have evolved from monotherapy with interferon alfa (IFNalpha), to combination therapy with ribavirin. Pegylated IFNalpha is superior to conventional IFNalpha, and forms the basis of current recommendations. The genotype of HCV influences treatment efficacy. Treatment is generally well tolerated in children, although adverse effects are common. Preparation and support throughout treatment for the whole family is needed. A proportion of children with HCV infection have co-morbidity, including viral co-infection or hematologic disease. Although treatment may be contraindicated, risks and benefits must be considered before denying treatment. Anemia is more common in those with HIV co-infection, renal insufficiency, thalassemia, or cirrhosis, and may be aggravated by treatment. Children with thalassemia may have iron overload, and transfusion requirements may increase during treatment. Further refinements of combination therapy and development of new drugs are in progress. Vaccine candidates are undergoing phase I and II treatment trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne M Davison
- Children's Liver and GI Unit, St James's University Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Endogenous cytotoxic T-cell response contributes to the long-term antiretroviral protection induced by a short period of antibody-based immunotherapy of neonatally infected mice. J Virol 2007; 82:1339-49. [PMID: 18032505 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01970-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are increasingly being considered for blunting human viral infections. However, whether they can also exert indirect effects on endogenous antiviral immune responses has been essentially overlooked. We have recently shown that a short (several-day) period of immunotherapy with the neutralizing 667 MAb of mouse neonates shortly after infection with the lethal FrCas(E) retrovirus not only has an immediate effect on the viral load but also permits an endogenous antiviral immunity to emerge. Even though passive immunotherapy was administered during the particular period of immunocompetence acquisition, the endogenous response eventually arising was protective and persisted long (>1 year) after the MAb has disappeared. As very high levels of anti-FrCas(E) antibodies, predominantly of the immunoglobulin G2a (IgG2a) isotype and showing strong neutralization activity, were found in the sera of MAb-treated mice, it was necessary to address whether this humoral immunity was sufficient on its own to confer full protection against FrCas(E) or whether a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response was also necessary. Using a variety of in vivo assays in young and adult animals previously infected by FrCas(E) and treated by 667, we show here that transient 667 immunotherapy is associated with the emergence of a CTL response against virus-infected cells. This cytotoxic activity is indispensable for long-term antiviral protective immunity, as high neutralizing antibody titers, even enhanced in in vivo CD8(+) cell depletion experiments, cannot prevent the FrCas(E)-induced death of infected/treated mice. Our work may have important therapeutic consequences, as it indicates that a short period of MAb-based immunotherapy conducted at a stage where the immune system is still developing can be associated with the mounting of a functional Th1-type immune response characterized by both CTL and IgG2a-type humoral contributions, the cooperation of which is known to be essential for the containment of chronic infections by a variety of viruses.
Collapse
|
27
|
Pawlotsky JM, Chevaliez S, McHutchison JG. The hepatitis C virus life cycle as a target for new antiviral therapies. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:1979-98. [PMID: 17484890 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 223] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2007] [Accepted: 03/23/2007] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The burden of disease consequent to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been well described and is expected to increase dramatically over the next decade. Current approved antiviral therapies are effective in eradicating the virus in approximately 50% of infected patients. However, pegylated interferon and ribavirin-based therapy is costly, prolonged, associated with significant adverse effects, and not deemed suitable for many HCV-infected patients. As such, there is a clear and pressing need for the development of additional agents that act through alternate or different mechanisms, in the hope that such regimens could lead to enhanced response rates more broadly applicable to patients with hepatitis C infection. Recent basic science enhancements in HCV cell culture systems and replication assays have led to a broadening of our understanding of many of the mechanisms of HCV replication and, therefore, potential novel antiviral targets. In this article, we have attempted to highlight important new information as it relates to our understanding of the HCV life cycle. These steps broadly encompass viral attachment, entry, and fusion; viral RNA translation; posttranslational processing; HCV replication; and viral assembly and release. In each of these areas, we present up-to-date knowledge of the relevant aspects of that component of the viral life cycle and then describe the preclinical and clinical development targets and pathways being explored in the translational and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Michel Pawlotsky
- French National Reference Center for Viral Hepatitis B, C, and delta, Department of Virology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris 12, Créteil, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|