1
|
Liu Y, Pu X, Qin X, Gong J, Huang Z, Luo Y, Mou T, Zhou B, Shen A, Wu Z. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Regulate HMGB1 Translocation and Kupffer Cell M1 Polarization During Acute Liver Transplantation Rejection. Front Immunol 2022; 13:823511. [PMID: 35603144 PMCID: PMC9120840 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.823511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) play important roles in hepatic ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) and acute rejection (AR)-induced immune responses to inflammation. After liver transplantation, HMGB1, an inflammatory mediator, contributes to the development of AR. Even though studies have found that HMGB1 can promote NET formation, the correlation between NETs and HMGB1 in the development of AR following liver transplantation has not been elucidated. In this study, levels of serum NETs were significantly elevated in patients after liver transplantation. Moreover, we found that circulating levels of NETs were negatively correlated with liver function. In addition, liver transplantation and elevated extracellular HMGB1 promoted NET formation. The HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway, which is initiated by HMGB1, participates in NET processes. Moreover, in the liver, Kupffer cells were found to be the main cells secreting HMGB1. NETs induced Kupffer cell M1 polarization and decreased the intracellular translocation of HMGB1 by inhibiting DNase-1. Additionally, co-treatment with TAK-242 (a TLR-4 inhibitor) and rapamycin more effectively alleviated the damaging effects of AR following liver transplantation than either drug alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanyao Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xingyu Pu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoyan Qin
- Department of General Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Children Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Children Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Junhua Gong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zuotian Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yunhai Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Tong Mou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Baoyong Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ai Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Tumor Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhongjun Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Angelico R, Sensi B, Manzia TM, Tisone G, Grassi G, Signorello A, Milana M, Lenci I, Baiocchi L. Chronic rejection after liver transplantation: Opening the Pandora's box. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:7771-7783. [PMID: 34963740 PMCID: PMC8661381 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic rejection (CR) of liver allografts causes damage to intrahepatic vessels and bile ducts and may lead to graft failure after liver transplantation. Although its prevalence has declined steadily with the introduction of potent immunosuppressive therapy, CR still represents an important cause of graft injury, which might be irreversible, leading to graft loss requiring re-transplantation. To date, we still do not fully appreciate the mechanisms underlying this process. In addition to T cell-mediated CR, which was initially the only recognized type of CR, recently a new form of liver allograft CR, antibody-mediated CR, has been identified. This has indeed opened an era of thriving research and renewed interest in the field. Liver biopsy is needed for a definitive diagnosis of CR, but current research is aiming to identify new non-invasive tools for predicting patients at risk for CR after liver transplantation. Moreover, the minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy might influence the establishment of subclinical CR-related injury, which should not be disregarded. Therapies for CR may only be effective in the "early" phases, and a tailored management of the immunosuppression regimen is essential for preventing irreversible liver damage. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge and research on CR, focusing on early detection, identification of non-invasive biomarkers, immunosuppressive management, re-transplantation and future perspectives of CR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Angelico
- Department of Surgery Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgery Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Tommaso M Manzia
- Department of Surgery Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Department of Surgery Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grassi
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | | | - Martina Milana
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dehghani SM, Shahramian I, Ayatollahi M, Parooie F, Salarzaei M, Bahmanyar M, Sargazi A, Delaramnasab M. The incidence and risk factors of chronic rejection in acutely rejected pediatric liver transplantation. RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL ORGANS 2021; 23:26-31. [DOI: 10.15825/25/1995-1191-2021-4-26-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background. Chronic graft rejection (CR) represents an increasing concern in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). Risk factors of CR in this population are uncertain. In present study, we aimed to ascertain if clinical parameters could predict the occurrence of CR in LT children.Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the results from 47 children who had experienced acute hepatic rejection in Namazee hospital, Shiraz, Iran during 2007–2017.Results. Out of 47 children, 22 (46.8%) and 25 (53.2%) were boys and girls respectively. Ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were observed in 20 (44.4%), 14 (31.1%), and 4 (9.1%) respectively. Posttransplant vascular and biliary complications were observed in 3 (7%) and 4 (9.3%) cases respectively. The mean time from LT to normalization of liver enzymes was 14.2 ± 7.5 days. The mean of acute rejection episodes was 1.4 ± 0.6 (median = 1 (22, 46.8%), range of 1–3). Six (12.7%) patients experienced CR. The mean time from LT to CR was 75 ± 28.4 days. A significant association was found between CR and patients’ condition (being inpatient or outpatient) before surgery (P = 0.03). No significant relationship was found between CR and post-transplant parameters except for biliary complications (P = 0.01). Both biliary complication (RR = 33.7, 95% CI: 2.2–511, P = 0.01) and inpatient status (RR = 10.9, 95% CI: 1.1–102.5, P = 0.03) significantly increased the risk of CR.Conclusion. Being hospitalized at the time of LT, and development of biliary complications might predict risk factors for development of CR in LT children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. M. Dehghani
- Shiraz Organ Transplantation Center, Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
| | - I. Shahramian
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Science
| | - M. Ayatollahi
- Shiraz Organ Transplantation Center, Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
| | - F. Parooie
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Science
| | - M. Salarzaei
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Science
| | | | - A. Sargazi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Science
| | - M. Delaramnasab
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Science
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khajeh E, Polychronidis G, Ramouz A, Alamdari P, Lemekhova A, Saracevic M, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Ghamarnejad O, Majlesara A, Abbasi Dezfouli S, Nickkholgh A, Weiss KH, Rupp C, Mehrabi A, Mieth M. Evaluation of the impact of Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression on Heidelberg liver transplant cohort (HDTACRO): Study protocol for an investigator initiated, non-interventional prospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e22180. [PMID: 32991411 PMCID: PMC7523857 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression has resulted in enormous improvements on liver transplantation (LTx) outcomes. However, dose adjustment and medication adherence play a key role in post-transplant treatment success. The aim of the present study is to assess the trough levels and the need for adaptation of therapeutic doses in de novo LTx patients treated with Tacrolimus in the clinical routine, without any intervention to the treatment regimen. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a pilot, prospective, exploratory, monocentric, non-interventional and non-randomized investigator-initiated study. Prospectively maintained data of 100 patients treated with various oral Tacrolimus-based immunosuppressants (Prograf or Envarsus) will be analyzed. The number of required dose adjustments of Tacrolimus formulations used in clinical routine for achieving the target trough level, Tacrolimus trough level, Tacrolimus dosing, concentration/dose ratio, routine laboratory tests, efficacy data (incl. survival, acute rejection, re-transplantation), patients therapy adherence, and infections requiring the need to reduce individual immunosuppressant dosing will be evaluated for each patient. RESULT This study will evaluate the trough levels and the need for adaptation of therapeutic doses in de novo LTx patients treated with Tacrolimus in the clinical routine, without any intervention to the treatment regimen. CONCLUSION The HDTACRO study will be the first study to systematically and prospectively evaluate various oral Tacrolimus-based immunosuppressants in de novo liver transplanted patients. If a difference between the therapy-subgroups is evident at the end of the trial, a randomized control trial will eventually be designed. Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04444817.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Georgios Polychronidis
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Parnian Alamdari
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Anastasia Lemekhova
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Melisa Saracevic
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | | | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Ali Majlesara
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Sepehr Abbasi Dezfouli
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Arash Nickkholgh
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Karl Heinz Weiss
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Heidelberg
| | - Christian Rupp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
High Intrapatient Variability in Tacrolimus Exposure Is Not Associated With Immune-mediated Graft Injury After Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2020; 103:2329-2337. [PMID: 30801539 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high intrapatient variability (IPV) in tacrolimus exposure is associated with impaired long-term clinical outcome after kidney transplantation. It remains to be determined if this is equally detrimental for liver transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between IPV in tacrolimus exposure and immune-mediated graft injury after liver transplantation. METHODS For 326 liver transplant recipients, transplanted between 2000 and 2015, tacrolimus IPV was calculated from at least 5 tacrolimus trough samples obtained between months 6 and 18 after liver transplantation and expressed as the coefficient of variation. Primary composite endpoint consisted of immune-mediated graft injury (chronic rejection, biopsy proven, and suspected late acute rejection) after month 6. Secondary outcomes were the association between tacrolimus IPV on (1) loss of renal function per year of follow-up and (2) cytomegalovirus viremia after month 6. RESULTS Of the 326 included liver transplant recipients, 70 patients (21.5%) reached the primary endpoint. Median tacrolimus coefficient of variation was 28%. There was no significant difference in reaching the primary composite endpoint between the low- and high-IPV groups (P = 0.068). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score pretransplantation and the number of acute rejections were identified as independent predictors for immune-mediated graft injury (P = 0.049 and 0.016). A higher IPV in combination with a low kidney function at baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 40 mL/min) was associated with greater loss of renal function per year of follow-up (P = 0.007). Tacrolimus variability was not associated with late cytomegalovirus viremia. CONCLUSIONS High IPV in tacrolimus exposure beyond month 6 postliver transplantation was not associated with immune-mediated graft injury.
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Aguiar D, Martínez-Urbistondo D, Baroja-Mazo A, de la Mata M, Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Rubín A, Puchades L, Serrano T, Montero J, Cuadrado A, Casafont F, Salcedo M, Rincón D, Pons JA, Herrero JI. Real-World Multicenter Experience of Immunosuppression Minimization Among 661 Liver Transplant Recipients. Ann Transplant 2017; 22:265-275. [PMID: 28461684 PMCID: PMC6248177 DOI: 10.12659/aot.902523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 12/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients is frequently secondary to immunosuppression toxicity. However, data are scarce regarding immunosuppression minimization in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this cross-sectional, multicenter study, we reviewed the indications of immunosuppression minimization (defined as tacrolimus levels below 5 ng/mL or cyclosporine levels below 50 ng/mL) among 661 liver transplant recipients, as well as associated factors and the effect on renal function. RESULTS Fifty-three percent of the patients received minimized immunosuppression. The median time from transplantation to minimization was 32 months. The most frequent indications were renal insufficiency (49%), cardiovascular risk (19%), de novo malignancy (8%), and cardiovascular disease (7%). The factors associated with minimization were older age at transplantation, longer post-transplant follow-up, pre-transplant diabetes mellitus and renal dysfunction, and the hospital where the patients were being followed. The patients who were minimized because of renal insufficiency had a significant improvement in renal function (decrease of the median serum creatinine level, from 1.50 to 1.34 mg/dL; P=0.004). Renal function significantly improved in patients minimized for other indications, too. In the long term, glomerular filtration rate significantly decreased in non-minimized patients and remained stable in minimized patients. CONCLUSIONS Immunosuppression minimization is frequently undertaken in long-term liver transplant recipients, mainly for renal insufficiency. Substantial variability exists regarding the use of IS minimization among centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Aguiar
- Liver Unit, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Alberto Baroja-Mazo
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Murcia Institute for Biomedical Research (IMIB-Arrixaca), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Manuel de la Mata
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Liver Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
- Maimónides Institute of Biomedical Research (IMBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Liver Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
- Maimónides Institute of Biomedical Research (IMBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Angel Rubín
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Liver Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Trinidad Serrano
- Gastroenterology Service, Lozano Blesa University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Jessica Montero
- Gastroenterology Service, Lozano Blesa University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Antonio Cuadrado
- Gastroenterology Service, Marques de Vadecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | - Fernando Casafont
- Gastroenterology Service, Marques de Vadecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | - Magdalena Salcedo
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Gastroenterology Service, Gregorio Marañon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Rincón
- Gastroenterology Service, Gregorio Marañon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose A. Pons
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Murcia Institute for Biomedical Research (IMIB-Arrixaca), Pamplona, Spain
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division and Liver Transplantation Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jose I. Herrero
- Liver Unit, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Institute for Health Investigation of Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neuberger JM, Bechstein WO, Kuypers DRJ, Burra P, Citterio F, De Geest S, Duvoux C, Jardine AG, Kamar N, Krämer BK, Metselaar HJ, Nevens F, Pirenne J, Rodríguez-Perálvarez ML, Samuel D, Schneeberger S, Serón D, Trunečka P, Tisone G, van Gelder T. Practical Recommendations for Long-term Management of Modifiable Risks in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Guidance Report and Clinical Checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) Group. Transplantation 2017; 101:S1-S56. [PMID: 28328734 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Short-term patient and graft outcomes continue to improve after kidney and liver transplantation, with 1-year survival rates over 80%; however, improving longer-term outcomes remains a challenge. Improving the function of grafts and health of recipients would not only enhance quality and length of life, but would also reduce the need for retransplantation, and thus increase the number of organs available for transplant. The clinical transplant community needs to identify and manage those patient modifiable factors, to decrease the risk of graft failure, and improve longer-term outcomes.COMMIT was formed in 2015 and is composed of 20 leading kidney and liver transplant specialists from 9 countries across Europe. The group's remit is to provide expert guidance for the long-term management of kidney and liver transplant patients, with the aim of improving outcomes by minimizing modifiable risks associated with poor graft and patient survival posttransplant.The objective of this supplement is to provide specific, practical recommendations, through the discussion of current evidence and best practice, for the management of modifiable risks in those kidney and liver transplant patients who have survived the first postoperative year. In addition, the provision of a checklist increases the clinical utility and accessibility of these recommendations, by offering a systematic and efficient way to implement screening and monitoring of modifiable risks in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Neuberger
- 1 Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2 Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Frankfurt University Hospital and Clinics, Germany. 3 Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Belgium. 4 Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy. 5 Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. 6 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Switzerland. 7 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Belgium. 8 Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), Paris-Est University (UPEC), France. 9 Department of Nephrology, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom. 10 Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. 11 Vth Department of Medicine & Renal Transplant Program, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. 12 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 13 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Belgium. 14 Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Microbiology and Immunology Department, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Belgium. 15 Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, IMIBIC, CIBERehd, Spain. 16 Hepatobiliary Centre, Hospital Paul-Brousse (AP-HP), Paris-Sud University, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. 17 Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria. 18 Nephrology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain. 19 Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic. 20 Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy. 21 Department of Hospital Pharmacy and Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wadström J, Ericzon BG, Halloran PF, Bechstein WO, Opelz G, Serón D, Grinyó J, Loupy A, Kuypers D, Mariat C, Clancy M, Jardine AG, Guirado L, Fellström B, O'Grady J, Pirenne J, O'Leary JG, Aluvihare V, Trunečka P, Baccarani U, Neuberger J, Soto-Gutierrez A, Geissler EK, Metzger M, Gray M. Advancing Transplantation: New Questions, New Possibilities in Kidney and Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2017; 101 Suppl 2S:S1-S41. [PMID: 28125449 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Wadström
- 1 Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 2 Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3 Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Canada. 4 Frankfurt University Hospital and Clinics, Frankfurt, Germany. 5 University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 6 Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain. 7 Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. 8 Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Spain. 9 Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France. 10 University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 11 University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Jean Monnet University, France. 12 Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 13 Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain. 14 University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden. 15 King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 16 Baylor University Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX. 17 Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic. 18 Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy. 19 Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 20 Directorate of Organ Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom. 21 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 22 Experimental Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 23 Ahead of Time GmbH, Starnberg, Germany. 24 Better Value Healthcare, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Rico-Juri JM, Tsochatzis E, Burra P, De la Mata M, Lerut J. Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection as an efficacy endpoint of randomized trials in liver transplantation: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Transpl Int 2016; 29:961-973. [PMID: 26714264 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2015] [Revised: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (ACR) is the primary efficacy endpoint in most randomized trials evaluating immunosuppression in liver transplantation. However, ACR is not a major cause of graft loss, and a certain grade of immune activation may be even beneficial for long-term graft acceptance. Validated criteria to select candidates for liver biopsy are lacking, and routine clinical practice relies on liver tests, which are inaccurate markers of ACR. Indeed, both the agreement among clinicians to select candidates for liver biopsy and the correlation between the clinical suspicion of ACR and histological findings are poor. In randomized trials evaluating immunosuppression protocols, this concern grows exponentially due to the open-label and multicenter nature of most studies. Therefore, biopsy-proven ACR is a suboptimal efficacy endpoint given its limited impact on prognosis and the heterogeneous diagnosis, which may increase the risk of bias. Chronic rejection and/or graft loss would be more appropriate endpoints, but would certainly require larger studies with prolonged surveillances. An objective method to select candidates for liver biopsy is therefore urgently needed, and only severe episodes of histological ACR should be considered as potentially harmful. Emerging surrogate markers of ACR and antibody-mediated rejection require further investigation to determine their clinical role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, IMIBIC, CIBERehd, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Jose M Rico-Juri
- Starzl Unit of Abdominal Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Emmanuel Tsochatzis
- UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health and Sheila Sherlock Liver Unit, Royal Free Hospital and UCL, London, UK
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Manuel De la Mata
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, IMIBIC, CIBERehd, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Jan Lerut
- Starzl Unit of Abdominal Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen X, Zhang Z, Bi Y, Fu Z, Gong P, Li Y, Yu Q, Jia A, Wang J, Xue L, Yang H, Liu G. mTOR signaling disruption from myeloid-derived suppressive cells protects against immune-mediated hepatic injury through the HIF1α-dependent glycolytic pathway. J Leukoc Biol 2016; 100:1349-1362. [DOI: 10.1189/jlb.2a1115-492r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
|
12
|
Early Predictors of Long-term Outcomes of HCV-negative Liver Transplant Recipients Having Survived the First Postoperative Year. Transplantation 2016; 100:382-90. [PMID: 26683515 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The non-improvement in >1-year post-liver transplant (LT) survival and diminishing importance of hepatitis C (HCV) with modern antivirals justify identification of early factors predictive of long-term outcome post-LT in HCV-negative recipients. METHODS This nationwide study included all 631 HCV-negative adult patients transplanted in Finland 1982-2013 with at least 1-year graft survival (6311 person-year follow-up). We tested 37 variables, including immunosuppression, for their association with >1-year combined graft loss/mortality, late rejection, cancer, or infections. RESULTS Significant multivariate predictors of graft loss/mortality were male gender (HR 2.40, P = 0.001), pretransplant hepatocellular (HR 2.92, P = 0.001) or biliary cancer (HR 12.7, P < 0.001), glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.89, P = 0.002), hypertension (HR 0.44, P < 0.001), early posttransplant infections (HR 1.52-1.67, P = 0.007-0.03), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (HR 1.05, P < 0.001). Elevated ALP at 1 year, affecting 30% of patients, predicted both graft loss and rejection, independent of immunologic stability, etiology, and immunosuppression type. Area under the curve of ALP in predicting graft loss from rejection was 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.90) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.98, P = 0.001) among patients under 50. Among immunologically stable patients who underwent transplantation after 2000, antimetabolite use at 1 year was associated with improved survival (P = 0.04), specifically in the subgroup with native-liver hepatocellular or biliary cancer (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Easily measurable, widely available, and noninvasive factors known at 1 year post-LT can help stratify patients according to their long-term risk of death or graft loss, and thus facilitate a personalization of long-term follow-up. ALP deserves routine monitoring, and the cause for an elevated ALP should be sought.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tannuri ACA, Lima F, de Mello ES, Tanigawa RY, Tannuri U. Prognostic factors for the evolution and reversibility of chronic rejection in pediatric liver transplantation. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2016; 71:216-20. [PMID: 27166772 PMCID: PMC4825201 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2016(04)07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chronic rejection remains a major cause of graft failure with indication for re-transplantation. The incidence of chronic rejection remains high in the pediatric population. Although several risk factors have been implicated in adults, the prognostic factors for the evolution and reversibility of chronic rejection in pediatric liver transplantation are not known. Hence, the current study aimed to determine the factors involved in the progression or reversibility of pediatric chronic rejection by evaluating a series of chronic rejection cases following liver transplantation. METHODS Chronic rejection cases were identified by performing liver biopsies on patients based on clinical suspicion. Treatment included maintaining high levels of tacrolimus and the introduction of mofetil mycophenolate. The children were divided into 2 groups: those with favorable outcomes and those with adverse outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors in these groups. RESULTS Among 537 children subjected to liver transplantation, chronic rejection occurred in 29 patients (5.4%). In 10 patients (10/29, 34.5%), remission of chronic rejection was achieved with immunosuppression (favorable outcomes group). In the remaining 19 patients (19/29, 65.5%), rejection could not be controlled (adverse outcomes group) and resulted in re-transplantation (7 patients, 24.1%) or death (12 patients, 41.4%). Statistical analysis showed that the presence of ductopenia was associated with worse outcomes (risk ratio=2.08, p=0.01). CONCLUSION The presence of ductopenia is associated with poor prognosis in pediatric patients with chronic graft rejection.
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang CX, Wen PH, Sun YL. Withdrawal of immunosuppression in liver transplantation and the mechanism of tolerance. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2015; 14:470-476. [PMID: 26459722 DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(15)60411-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunosuppression reagents have side effects and cause considerable long-term morbidity and mortality in patients after liver transplantation. Sufficient evidences showed that minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppression reagents does not deteriorate the recipient's immune response and physiological function and therefore, is feasible in some recipients of liver transplantation. However, the mechanisms are not clear. The present review was to update the current status of immunosuppression in liver transplantation and the mechanism of minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppression in liver recipients. DATA SOURCES We searched articles in English on minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppression in liver transplantation in PubMed. We focused on the basic mechanisms of immune tolerance in liver transplantation. Studies on immunosuppression minimization or withdrawal protocols and biomarker in tolerant recipients were also analyzed. RESULTS Minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppression can be achieved by the induction of immune tolerance, which may not be permanent and can be affected by various factors. However, accurately evaluating immune status post-transplant is a prerequisite to achieve individualized immunosuppression. Numerous mechanisms for immune tolerance have been found, including immunophenotypic shift of memory CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cell subsets. Activation of the inflammasome through apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a C-terminal caspase recruitment domain (ASC) in dendritic cells is associated with rejection after liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS Minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppression can be achieved by the induction of immune tolerance via different mechanisms. This process could be affected by immunophenotypic shift of memory CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cell subsets, which may be correlated with activation of the inflammasome through ASC in dendritic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Xian Zhang
- Institute of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, School of Medicine, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Comorbidities have a limited impact on post-transplant survival in carefully selected cirrhotic patients: a population-based cohort study. Ann Hepatol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s1665-2681(19)31172-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
|
16
|
Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) downregulates the immune response in a rat model of liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2015; 260:931-7; discussion 937-8. [PMID: 25243553 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a novel oxygenated perfusion approach on rejection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). BACKGROUND Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) was designed to prevent graft failure after OLT. One of the mechanisms is downregulation of Kupffer cells (in situ macrophages). We, therefore, designed experiments to test the effects of HOPE on the immune response in an allogeneic rodent model of nonarterialized OLT. METHODS Livers from Lewis rats were transplanted into Brown Norway rats to induce liver rejection in untreated recipients within 4 weeks. Next, Brown Norway recipients were treated with tacrolimus (1 mg/kg), whereas in a third group, liver grafts from Lewis rats underwent HOPE or deoxygenated machine perfusion for 1 hour before implantation, but recipients received no immunosuppression. In a last step, low-dose tacrolimus treatment (0.3 mg/kg) was assessed with and without HOPE. RESULTS Allogeneic OLT without immunosuppression led to death within 3 weeks after nonarterialized OLT due to severe acute rejection. Full-dose tacrolimus prevented rejection, whereas low-dose tacrolimus led to graft fibrosis within 4 weeks. HOPE treatment without immunosuppression also protected from lethal rejection. The combination of low-dose tacrolimus and 1-hour HOPE resulted in 100% survival within 4 weeks without any signs of rejection. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that allograft treatment by HOPE not only protects against preservation injury but also impressively downregulates the immune system, blunting the alloimmune response. Therefore, HOPE may offer many beneficial effects, not only to rescue marginal grafts but also by preventing rejection and the need for immunosuppression.
Collapse
|
17
|
Venkatpurwar VP, Rhodes S, Oien KA, Elliott MA, Tekwe CD, Jørgensen HG, Kumar MNVR. Drug- not carrier-dependent haematological and biochemical changes in a repeated dose study of cyclosporine encapsulated polyester nano- and micro-particles: size does not matter. Toxicology 2015; 330:9-18. [PMID: 25637670 DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2014] [Revised: 01/26/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Biodegradable nanoparticles are being considered more often as drug carriers to address pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic issues, yet nano-product safety has not been systematically proven. In this study, haematological, biochemical and histological parameters were examined on 28 day daily dosing of rats with nano- or micro-particle encapsulated cyclosporine (CsA) to confirm if any changes observed were drug or carrier dependent. CsA encapsulated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) [PLGA] nano- (nCsA) and micro-particles (mCsA) were prepared by emulsion techniques. CsA (15, 30, 45 mg/kg) were administered by oral gavage to Sprague Dawley (SD) rats over 28 days. Haematological and biochemical metrics were followed with tissue histology performed on sacrifice. Whether presented as nCsA or mCsA, 45 mg/kg dose caused significant loss of body weight and lowered food consumption compared to untreated control. Across the doses, both nCsA and mCsA produce significant decreases in lymphocyte numbers compared to controls, commensurate with the proprietary product, Neoral(®) 15. Dosing with nCsA showed higher serum drug levels than mCsA presumably owing to the smaller particle size facilitating absorption. The treatment had no noticeable effects on inflammatory/oxidative stress markers or antioxidant enzyme levels, except an increase in ceruloplasmin (CP) levels for high dose nCsA/mCsA group. Further, only subtle, sub-lethal changes were observed in histology of nCsA/mCsA treated rat organs. Blank (drug-free) particles did not induce changes in the parameters studied. Therefore, it is extremely important that the encapsulated drug in the nano-products is considered when safety of the overall product is assessed rather than relying on just the particle size. This study has addressed some concerns surrounding particulate drug delivery, demonstrating safe delivery of CsA whilst achieving augmented serum concentrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V P Venkatpurwar
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0RE, UK
| | - S Rhodes
- Paul O'Gorman Leukaemia Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, G12 0ZD
| | - K A Oien
- Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, G61 1BD
| | - M A Elliott
- Cancer Research UK Formulation Unit, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0RE, UK
| | - C D Tekwe
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, 1266 Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-1266, USA
| | - H G Jørgensen
- Paul O'Gorman Leukaemia Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, G12 0ZD
| | - M N V Ravi Kumar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Centre, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-1114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gotthardt DN, Bruns H, Weiss KH, Schemmer P. Current strategies for immunosuppression following liver transplantation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014; 399:981-988. [PMID: 24748543 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1191-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Accepted: 03/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New strategies for immunosuppression (IS) after liver transplantation (LTx) are in part responsible for the increased patient and graft survival seen over time. With a few basic exceptions-notably the continued use of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs)-IS drugs and regimens being used today are different from those used 30 years ago. While graft loss due to acute or chronic rejection has become rare, the side effect burden of IS drugs exerts a significant toll on patients. CONCEPTS/TRENDS CNIs continue to form the backbone of IS regimens, although their use is hampered by nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects. Consequently, a variety of CNI reduction or withdrawal strategies have formed the basis of clinical trials or entered into clinical practice. These trials have included the use of everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies. Basiliximab, as well as other lymphocyte nondepleting and depleting agents, have shown benefit in induction regimens. SUMMARY Along with steroid reduction or elimination, current strategies for IS after LTx continue to explore novel combinations of agents, with an aim toward striking a balance between diminution of rejection and the need for avoiding adverse effects of the IS drugs. Long-term maintenance strategies are also discussed in this review, as is development of tolerance and antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Nils Gotthardt
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Liu Z, Chen Y, Tao R, Xv J, Meng J, Yong X. Tacrolimus-based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in hepatitis C virus-infected patients after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One 2014; 9:e107057. [PMID: 25198195 PMCID: PMC4157850 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2014] [Accepted: 08/05/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Most liver transplant recipients receive calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), especially tacrolimus and cyclosporine, as immunosuppressant agents to prevent rejection. A controversy exists as to whether the outcomes of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected liver transplant patients differ based on the CNIs used. This meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of tacrolimus-based and cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, especially cases of HCV recurrence in liver transplant patients with end-stage liver disease caused by HCV infection. Methods Related articles were identified from the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase. Meta-analyses were performed for the results of homogeneous studies. Results Nine randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials were included. The total effect size of mortality (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.77–1.25, P = 0.87) and graft loss (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.83–1.33, P = 0.67) showed no significant difference between the two groups irrespective of duration of immunosuppressant therapy after liver transplantation. In addition, the HCV recurrence-induced mortality (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.66–1.89, P = 0.69), graft loss (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.64–4.07, P = 0.31) and retransplantation (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.48–4.09, P = 0.54), as well as available biopsies, confirmed that histological HCV recurrences (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.71–1.19, P = 0.51) were similar. Conclusion These results suggested no difference in posttransplant HCV recurrence-induced mortality, graft loss and retransplantation, as well as histological HCV recurrence in patients treated with tacrolimus-based and cyclosporine-based immunosuppresion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenmin Liu
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, College of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yi Chen
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, College of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Renchuan Tao
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, College of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Jing Xv
- Department of Hepato-biliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jianyuan Meng
- Department of Hepato-biliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xiangzhi Yong
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, College of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jia JJ, Lin BY, He JJ, Geng L, Kadel D, Wang L, Yu DD, Shen T, Yang Z, Ye YF, Zhou L, Zheng SS. ''Minimizing tacrolimus'' strategy and long-term survival after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:11363-11369. [PMID: 25170223 PMCID: PMC4145777 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2014] [Revised: 03/20/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the effect of the ‘‘minimizing tacrolimus’’ strategy on long-term survival of patients after liver transplantation (LT).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 319 patients who received LT between January 2009 and December 2011 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Following elimination of ineligible patients, 235 patients were included in the study. The relationship between early tacrolimus (TAC) exposure and survival period was analyzed by Kaplan Meier curves. Adverse effects related to TAC were evaluated by the χ2 test. Routine monitoring of blood TAC concentration (TC) was performed using the PRO-TracTM II Tacrolimus Elisa Kit (Diasorin, United States).
RESULTS: Of 235 subjects enrolled in the study, 124 (52.8%) experienced adverse effects due to TAC. When evaluating mean TC, the survival time of patients with a mean TC < 5 ng/mL was significantly shorter than that in the other groups (911.3 ± 131.6 d vs 1381.1 ± 66.1 d, 911.3 ± 131.6 d vs 1327.3 ± 47.8 d, 911.3 ± 131.6 d vs 1343.2 ± 83.1 d, P < 0.05), while the survival times of patients with a mean TC of 5-7, 7-10 and 10-15 ng/mL were comparable. Adverse effects due to TAC in all four groups were not significantly different. When comparing the standard deviation (SD) of TC among the groups, the survival time of patients with a SD of 2-4 was significantly longer than that in the other groups (1388.8 ± 45.4 d vs 1029.6 ± 131.3 d, 1388.8 ± 45.4 d vs 1274.9 ± 57.0 d, P < 0.05), while in patients with a SD < 2 and SD > 4, the survival time was not statistically different. Adverse effects experienced in all three groups were not statistically different. In Cox regression analysis, male patients and those with a primary diagnosis of benign disease, mean TC > 5 ng/mL and TC SD 2-4 had better outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The early ‘‘minimizing tacrolimus’’ strategy with a mean TC of 5-10 ng/mL and SD of 2-4 was beneficial in terms of long-term survival after LT.
Collapse
|
21
|
Song ATW, Avelino-Silva VI, Pecora RAA, Pugliese V, D’Albuquerque LAC, Abdala E. Liver transplantation: Fifty years of experience. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:5363-5374. [PMID: 24833866 PMCID: PMC4017051 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2013] [Accepted: 02/27/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Since 1963, when the first human liver transplantation (LT) was performed by Thomas Starzl, the world has witnessed 50 years of development in surgical techniques, immunosuppression, organ allocation, donor selection, and the indications and contraindications for LT. This has led to the mainstream, well-established procedure that has saved innumerable lives worldwide. Today, there are hundreds of liver transplant centres in over 80 countries. This review aims to describe the main aspects of LT regarding the progressive changes that have occurred over the years. We herein review historical aspects since the first experimental studies and the first attempts at human transplantation. We also provide an overview of immunosuppressive agents and their potential side effects, the evolution of the indications and contraindications of LT, the evolution of survival according to different time periods, and the evolution of methods of organ allocation.
Collapse
|