The UK DCD Risk Score: A new proposal to define futility in donation-after-circulatory-death liver transplantation

Upper limit of normothermic machine preservation of liver grafts from donation after circulatory death yet to be defined

BACKGROUND

The normothermic machine perfusion pump (NMPP) could shape the future of transplantation. Providing ex-vivo optimization, NMPP attenuates ischemic insult while replenishing energy. An understanding of machine perfusion time (MPT) impact and potential clinical benefits is paramount and necessitates exploration.

AIM

To investigate the relationship between MPT and post-transplant graft function.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the first 50 donation after circulatory death (DCD) grafts preserved using NMPP in a tertiary institution was performed. Essential preservation time points, graft parameters, recipient information, and postoperative outcomes were prospectively recorded. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD), L-Graft₇ score and 90-day outcomes were collected for all grafts. The first 20 recipients were allocated into the early group, considered the learning curve population for the center. The subsequent 30 were allocated into the late group. Recipients were also stratified into cohorts depending on MPT, i.e., short (< 8 hours), medium (8-16 hours) and long (> 16 hours).

RESULTS

NMPP operational parameters were not predictive of EAD, L-GrAFT₇ or 90-day outcomes. The early group had significantly less MPT and cold ischemia time than the late group (553 minutes vs 850 minutes, P < 0.001) and (127.5 minutes vs 154 minutes, P = 0.025), respectively. MPT had no impact in either group.

CONCLUSION

Increased MPT of DCD liver grafts had no adverse recipient results for the times utilized in this population, indicating its upper limits, likely beyond 24 hours, are not demonstrated within this study. Future studies are necessary to determine whether longer MPT is beneficial or detrimental to graft function and, if the latter, what is the maximum safe duration. Further studies of the effect of normothermic machine perfusion pump duration on long-term outcomes are also needed.

Deceased donor liver utilisation and assessment: Consensus guidelines from the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association

Over the past two decades, the application of machine perfusion (MP) in human liver transplantation has moved from the realm of clinical exploration to routine clinical practice. Both in situ and ex situ perfusion strategies are feasible, safe, and may offer improvements in relevant post-transplant outcomes. An important utility of these strategies is the ability to transplant grafts traditionally considered too risky to transplant using conventional cold storage alone. While dynamic assessment and ultimately transplantation of such livers is an important goal for the international liver transplant community, its clinical application is inconsistent. To this end, ELITA (the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association) gathered a panel of experts to create consensus guidelines regarding selection, approach, and criteria for deceased donor liver assessment in the MP era. An eight-member steering committee (SC) convened a panel of 44 professionals working in 14 countries in Europe and North America. The SC identified topics related to liver utilisation and assessment for transplantation. For each topic, subtopics were created to answer specific clinical questions. A systematic literature review was performed, and the panel graded relevant evidence. The SC drafted initial statements addressing each clinical question. Statements were presented at the in-person Consensus Meeting on Liver Discard and Viability Assessment during the ELITA Summit held from April 19-20, 2024, in Madrid, Spain. Online voting was held to approve statements according to a modified Delphi method; statements reaching ≥85% agreement were approved. Statements addressing liver utilisation, the definition of high-risk livers, and strategies and criteria for dynamic liver assessment are presented.

Enhancing Organ Availability: Increased DCD Liver Utilization Following Implementation of a Normothermic Machine Perfusion Program

In Australia, donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver utilization remains below that of comparable healthcare systems in the Northern Hemisphere, due to concerns over higher rates of early hepatocellular dysfunction/nonfunction and ischemic cholangiopathy, coupled with limited organ availability and challenging organ transport logistics. To address this, the Queensland Liver Transplant Service introduced the OrganOx Metra normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) device in 2018. Positive outcomes were initially reported for 10 livers, including five DCD livers deemed unsuitable for static cold storage (SCS). This retrospective, historical-control study evaluated whether NMP availability improved DCD liver utilization. The NMP era (June 2018 to June 2021) was compared to the SCS era (June 2015 to June 2018), with all DCD activity included, regardless of the preservation technique. Donor data were sourced from the DonateLife Queensland database, and patient outcome data were gathered from the electronic medical records of Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland. The NMP era showed significantly higher rates for medically suitable DCD offers(90.5% vs. 66.1%, p < 0.01), higher rates of formal DCD offers (88.1% vs. 61.0%, p < 0.01), greater DCD planned retrieval rate (56.6% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.01), and higher implantation rate as a proportion of all DCD offers (18.8% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.01). More potentially viable DCD grafts were declined because of the lack of suitable recipients, suggesting an abundance of available livers and reduced waitlist. Despite increased DCD utilization and a higher mean modified UK DCD risk score in the NMP era (1.5 vs. 0, p = 0.05), there was no increase in early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, ischemic cholangiopathy, or re-transplantation.

Normothermic regional perfusion and liver transplant: expanding the donation after circulatory death donor pool

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is a novel technique developed to improve organ utilization and recipient outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD). NRP has revolutionized DCD liver transplant by extending donor criteria and reducing the incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) and other complications in recipients. However, there is significant geographic and center-specific variation in NRP use and practices. This review collates practices from pioneering NRP centers across the globe regarding donor selection criteria, NRP techniques, organ viability monitoring, and other key areas to help guide the continued growth of NRP liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

DCD livers recovered using NRP have consistently demonstrated excellent outcomes, with IC and patient and graft survival rates approaching those seen with grafts from donation after brain death donors. Recently, transplant centers have been working to increase the DCD donor pool by relaxing limits on donor quality, reconsidering organ viability markers, and combining NRP with ex situ machine perfusion technologies.

SUMMARY

NRP is a powerful organ recovery technology transforming the practice of DCD liver transplantation. Current evidence suggests that organ utilization could be further expanded using NRP recovery, with excellent clinical outcomes reported by centers using less stringent donor and organ viability criteria.

Ferroptosis Inhibition: A Key Opportunity for the Treatment of Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Liver Transplantation

The outcome after liver transplantation has improved in recent years, which can be attributed to superior storage and transportation conditions of the organs, as well as better peri- and postoperative management and advancements in surgical techniques. Nevertheless, there is an increasing discrepancy between the need for organs and their availability. Consequently, the mortality rate on the waiting list is high and continues to rise. One way of counteracting this trend is to increase the use of "expanded criteria donors." This means that more and more donors will be included, especially those who are older and having additional comorbidities (eg, steatosis). A major complication of any transplantation is the occurrence of ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI), which often leads to liver dysfunction and failure. However, there have been various promising approaches to minimize IRI in recent years, but an effective and clinically applicable method to achieve a better outcome for patients after liver transplantation is still missing. Thereby, the so-called marginal organs are predominantly affected by IRI; thus, it is crucial to develop suitable and effective treatment options for patients. Recently, regulated cell death mechanisms, particularly ferroptosis, have been implicated to play a major role in IRI, including the liver. Therefore, inhibiting this kind of cell death modality presents a promising therapeutic approach for the management of this yet untreatable condition. Thus, this review provides an overview of the role of ferroptosis in liver IRI and transplantation and discusses possible therapeutic solutions based on ferroptosis inhibition to restrain IRI in marginal organs (especially steatosis and donation after circulatory death organs).

Expanding the Liver Donor Pool: Promise and Peril

Liver transplantation remains a life-saving therapy for a growing list of indications. Although 10,660 adult liver transplants were performed in the United States in 2023, a 50% increase over the preceding decade, the demand continues to far exceed the supply. Efforts to expand the liver donor pool by using donors that were previously considered unsuitable have remained an important strategy to help overcome shortages. We discuss the progress that has been made over the past decade, as well as potential future barriers that will need to be overcome to help successfully expand the liver donor pool.

Prolonged time from cross-clamp until normothermic machine perfusion start is associated with an increased risk of early allograft dysfunction following DCD liver transplant

There is a paucity of data on the impact of cold ischemia time before the initiation of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), particularly in more susceptible organs such as livers from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. The present analysis aimed to investigate the impact of prolonged time from cross-clamp until NMP start on early allograft dysfunction and other peri-liver transplant (LT) outcomes. All DCD LT performed and placed on NMP at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Rochester from January 2022 to March 2024 were included. The decision was made a priori to divide the population into 2 groups based on terciles: typical cross-clamp to on-pump time (lower 2 terciles) versus prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump time (upper tercile; >2 h 45.6 min). Three hundred eighty-four DCD LT undergoing NMP met the inclusion criteria. The rate of early allograft dysfunction was significantly higher in the prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump group (51.2%) compared to the typical cross-clamp to on-pump group (37.6%) ( p = 0.01). The prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump group also had higher rates of acute kidney injury and the number of packed red blood cells transfused during LT. No significant difference in ischemic cholangiopathy (2.4% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.68) or graft survival at 12 months was seen between the prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump and typical cross-clamp to on-pump group, respectively. Following cross-clamp, DCD liver grafts should be placed on the NMP pump as quickly as is safely and logistically possible. In cases where delays are unavoidable, such as waiting for biopsy results or liver reallocation with another center, acceptable results can still be achieved, and therefore, livers with prolonged times should still be used.

Elderly Ages in Liver Transplantation: Are Older Donors Really Higher Risk?

Background

There is currently a supply and demand mismatch in liver transplantation, with more patients needing transplants than grafts available. The use of older donors is one potential way of expanding access to viable grafts. No national study has yet reported on outcomes of liver transplants with donors ≥70 y.

Methods

The US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients registry was queried for deceased donor LT (1988-2021). Balance-of-risk (BAR) score was calculated for each patient. The primary outcome was graft survival. Cubic spline curves were used to evaluate the full spectrum of donor ages.

Results

A total of 148 960 livers met inclusion criteria: 5414 (3.6%) from donors ≥70 y and 4291 (2.9%) recipients ≥70 y. Within the overall cohort, graft survival decreased with increased donor and recipient age. Median graft survival within donors ≥70 y improved over time from 2.2 y (interquartile range [IQR] 0.2-9.8 y) in 1987-1999 to 9.6 y (IQR 3.2-11.6 y) in 2010-2019 (P < 0.0001). Elderly donors had equivalent outcomes to donors <70 y when transplanted in elderly recipients (≥70 y). Outcomes for young recipients that received grafts from elderly donor improved with time, with median survival of 10.1 y (IQR 3.9-11.5 y) in 2010-2019. BAR and survival outcomes following liver transplant (SOFT) scores predicted improved graft survival on time-to-event analysis in all donors aged >70 y. In low-risk recipients, evidenced by preallocation SOFT score <5, elderly donors had comparable outcomes to young (<40 y) and middle-aged donors (40-69 y). Increasing donor age was not associated with worse graft survival in transplants performed between 2010 and 2019.

Conclusions

Donors aged ≥70 y may be more comfortably considered for deceased donor liver transplantation, especially within low-risk recipients. The BAR and SOFT scores may be a useful guide for safely expanding the use of these theoretically riskier liver grafts.

Sequential Hypothermic and Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Extended Criteria Donors in Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Preliminary Experience

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation (LT) is the sole curative option for liver failure and other primary liver conditions. However, the limited number of suitable donors compared with the growing number of patients requiring LT remains a leading cause of mortality among those on the waiting list. This has resulted in the expansion of criteria for donor eligibility. The sequential combination of ex situ reperfusion, dHOPE, and NMP helps reduce the occurrence of ischemia-reperfusion injury and assess organ viability prior to transplantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-arm, single-center study including all cases of liver grafts that underwent sequential perfusion between October 2021 and July 2024. Eligibility criteria for sequential perfusion were extended criteria DBD with macrosteatosis > 35%, use of high-dose vasopressors during donor ICU stay or episodes of cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability during procurement, prolonged ischemia time for logistic reasons, as well as DCD showing prolonged fWIT, flow alteration during normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), and DCDs in Maastricht 2 class. Viability was assessed following the Groeningen group criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-three cases were included and 16 met the viability criteria at the end of the sequential perfusion and were transplanted. One patient developed an early allograft failure (EAF) and another a primary nonfunction (PNF). All the other patients had a regular postoperative course, with no retransplantation, 56% of the cohort showing no postoperative complication and all currently in good standing, median follow-up 19 months (range 4-39).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential dHOPE and NMP is a strategy that can help assessing both viability and functionality of liver grafts from high-risk donors, expanding the donor pool and increasing the opportunities for patients on the waiting list to get a transplant.

Core outcome sets and benchmarking complications: Defining best practices for standardized outcome reporting in liver transplantation

The comparison of outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) is hampered by using clinically nonrelevant surrogate endpoints and considerable variability in reported relevant posttransplant outcomes. Such variability stems from nonstandard outcome measures across studies, variable definitions of the same complication, and different timing of reporting. The Clavien-Dindo classification was established to improve the rigor of outcome reporting but is nonspecific to an intervention, and there are unsolved dilemmas specifically related to LT. Core outcome sets (COSs) have been used in other specialties to standardize outcomes research, but have not been defined for LT. Thus, we use the 5 major benchmarking studies published to date to define a 10-measure COS for LT using previously validated metrics. We further provide standard definitions for each of the 10 measures that may be used in international research on the topic. These definitions also include standard time points for recording to facilitate between-study comparisons and future meta-analysis. These 10 outcomes are paired with 3 validated, procedure-independent metrics, including the Clavien-Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complications Index. The Clavien scale and Comprehensive Complications Index are specifically reviewed to enhance their utility in LT, and their use, along with the COS, is explored. We encourage future studies to employ this COS along with the Clavien-Dindo grading system and Comprehensive Complications Index to improve the reproducibility and generalizability of research concerning LT.

Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion: Real-world Experience and Outcomes of DCD Liver Transplantation

Background

Donation after circulatory death liver transplantation (DCD LT) is underused given historical outcomes fraught with ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). We aimed to assess 6-mo IC in LT from DCD via normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) compared with DCD via static cold storage (SCS).

Methods

A retrospective review of adult Maastricht-III DCD liver donors and recipients at the University of Colorado Hospital from January 1, 2017, to August 27, 2024, was performed. The 6-mo IC rate was compared between NRP and SCS. Secondary outcomes included biochemical assessments of accepted versus declined NRP liver allografts and allograft and patient survival for NRP and SCS groups.

Results

One hundred sixty-two DCD LTs (SCS = 79; NRP = 97) were performed and 150 recipients (SCS = 74; NRP = 86) reached 6-mo follow-up. Six-month IC was lower for NRP compared with SCS (1.2% versus 9.5%, P = 0.03). The Donor Risk Index (2.44 [2.02-2.82] versus 2.17 [1.97-2.30], P = 0.002) and UK DCD Risk Score (4.2 ± 2.9 versus 3.2 ± 2.3, P = 0.008) were higher for NRP versus SCS. The Liver Graft assessment Following Transplantation score was less for NRP compared with SCS (-3.3 versus -3.1, P < 0.05). There were several differences in median biochemical parameters during NRP between accepted and declined livers, including higher terminal biliary bicarbonate (22.7 [20.9-29.1] versus 10.8 [7.6-13.1] mEq/L, P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in 12-mo allograft or patient survival for NRP versus SCS.

Conclusions

NRP is a disruptive innovation that improves the utilization of DCD livers. Despite higher-risk donor-recipient pairing for NRP compared with SCS, we demonstrate a decrease in IC for NRP. These data facilitate benchmarking of thoracoabdominal NRP DCD LT and support further protocol development.

Normothermic Machine Perfusion Improves Outcomes for Donation After Cardiac Death Allografts With Extended Donor Warm Ischemia Time

INTRODUCTION

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts are underutilized in liver transplantation (LT) due to increased risk of complications. These risks stem from ischemic injury sustained during the total donor warm ischemia time (tDWIT), historically limited to 30 min. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) can mitigate these risks and facilitate LT of DCD grafts with extended tDWIT. We aimed to compare outcomes of DCD allografts with extended tDWIT preserved on NMP versus static cold storage (SCS).

METHODS

This single-center study included adult DCD LT with tDWIT ≥ 30 from 2019 to 2023. Outcomes of NMP and SCS were compared including EAD, IC, graft survival, and patient survival.

RESULTS

Among 68 DCD LT with tDWIT ≥ 30, 64.7% (n = 44) were preserved with NMP and 35.3% (n = 24) with SCS. No differences in donor or recipient demographics were observed. The median tDWIT was 33 min for NMP and 30.5 min for SCS (p < 0.01). Despite longer tDWIT, the NMP group had lower rates of EAD (4.5% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.01) and IC (2.3% vs. 29.2%, p < 0.01). One-year graft survival was higher in NMP (p < 0.01), and 1-year patient survival was comparable between groups (p = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

NMP challenges traditional tDWIT constraints and can increase the pool of viable DCD allografts for transplantation.

Advances and Challenges of Thrombolytic Therapy for Donation After Circulatory Death Organs

The demand for organ transplantation has exceeded the global supply of available organs. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is considered an effective method to solve the disparity between the supply and demand of organs, by expanding the donor pool. However, DCD organs experience long-term damage caused by warm ischemia (WI) and microthrombosis caused by diffuse intravascular coagulation. Unfortunately, because of concerns about post-transplantation complications, most organs considered high-risk are discarded, resulting in wasted medical resources and economic losses. However, thrombolytic therapy before transplantation may dissolve microthrombosis in DCD organs, improve organ microcirculation, and increase organ use. Herein, we review the current status and potential value of thrombolytic therapy before DCD organ transplantation, summarize the progress of thrombolytic therapy for DCD organ transplantation according to preclinical and clinical research, and emphasize the heterogeneity and limitations of studies that have caused some controversies associated with this therapy. Overall, the role of thrombolytic therapy should not be overlooked. We anticipate that thrombolytic therapy combined with machine perfusion will provide an opportunity to improve inferior-quality DCD grafts, resulting in their becoming more widely available and safer for transplantation, thus solving the urgent problem of organ shortage.

Challenges and opportunities in organ donation after circulatory death

In recent years, there has been resurgence in donation after circulatory death (DCD). Despite that, the number of organs transplanted from these donors remains low due to concerns about their function and a lack of an objective assessment at the time of donation. This overview examines the current DCD practices and the classification modifications to accommodate regional perspectives. Several risk factors underscore the reluctance to accept DCD organs, and we discuss the modern strategies to mitigate them. The advent of machine perfusion technology has revolutionized the field of DCD transplantation, leading to improved outcomes and better organ usage. With many strategies at our disposal, there is an urgent need for comparative trials to determine the optimal use of perfusion technologies for each donated organ type. Additional progress in defining therapeutic strategies to repair the damage sustained during the dying process should further improve DCD organ utilization and outcomes. However, there remains wide variability in access to DCD donation and transplantation, and organizational efforts should be doubled up with consensus on key ethical issues that still surround DCD donation in the era of machine perfusion.

Machine Learning Algorithms in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Under Normothermic Regional Perfusion: A Graft Survival Prediction Model

BACKGROUND

Several scores have been developed to stratify the risk of graft loss in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD). However, their performance is unsatisfactory in the Spanish population, where most cDCD livers are recovered using normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Consequently, we explored the role of different machine learning-based classifiers as predictive models for graft survival. A risk stratification score integrated with the model of end-stage liver disease score in a donor-recipient (D-R) matching system was developed.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study used 539 D-R pairs of cDCD livers recovered with NRP, including 20 donor, recipient, and NRP variables. The following machine learning-based classifiers were evaluated: logistic regression, ridge classifier, support vector classifier, multilayer perceptron, and random forest. The endpoints were the 3- and 12-mo graft survival rates. A 3- and 12-mo risk score was developed using the best model obtained.

RESULTS

Logistic regression yielded the best performance at 3 mo (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.82) and 12 mo (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.83). A D-R matching system was proposed on the basis of the current model of end-stage liver disease score and cDCD-NRP risk score.

CONCLUSIONS

The satisfactory performance of the proposed score within the study population suggests a significant potential to support liver allocation in cDCD-NRP grafts. External validation is challenging, but this methodology may be explored in other regions.

Long-term outcomes after hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion and transplantation of 1,202 donor livers in a real-world setting (HOPE-REAL study)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite strong evidence for improved preservation of donor livers by machine perfusion, longer post-transplant follow-up data are urgently needed in an unselected patient population. We aimed to assess long-term outcomes after transplantation of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE)-treated donor livers based on real-world data (i.e., IDEAL-D stage 4).

METHODS

In this international, multicentre, observational cohort study, we collected data from adult recipients of HOPE-treated livers transplanted between January 2012 and December 2021. Analyses were stratified by donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD), sub-divided by their respective risk categories. The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of primary non-function (PNF) and ischaemic cholangiopathy (IC).

RESULTS

We report on 1,202 liver transplantations (64% DBD) performed at 22 European centres. For DBD, a total number of 99 benchmark (8%), 176 standard (15%), and 493 extended-criteria (41%) cases were included. For DCD, 117 transplants were classified as low risk (10%), 186 as high risk (16%), and 131 as futile (11%), with significant risk profile variations among centres. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year death-censored graft survival rates for DBD and DCD livers were 95%, 92%, and 91%, vs. 92%, 87%, and 81%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.003). Within DBD and DCD strata, death-censored graft survival was similar among risk groups (log-rank p = 0.26, p = 0.99). Graft loss due to PNF or IC was 2.3% and 0.4% (DBD), and 5% and 4.1% (DCD).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows excellent 5-year survival after transplantation of HOPE-treated DBD and DCD livers with low rates of graft loss due to PNF or IC, irrespective of their individual risk profile. HOPE treatment has now reached IDEAL-D stage 4, which further supports its implementation in routine clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05520320.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

This study demonstrates the excellent long-term performance of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) treatment of donation after circulatory and donation after brain death liver grafts irrespective of their individual risk profile in a real-world setting, outside the evaluation of randomised-controlled trials. While previous studies have established safety, feasibility, and efficacy against the current standard, according to the IDEAL-D evaluation framework, HOPE treatment has now reached the final IDEAL-D stage 4, which further supports its implementation in routine clinical practice.

Outcomes of Liver Transplantation From Hepatitis C Virus-positive DCD Donors and Its Utilization Among Centers in the United States

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) or hepatitis C virus (HCV + ) liver grafts are underused among transplant centers in the United States. The study aimed to evaluate organ utilization and outcomes of liver grafts from DCD donors with HCV infection.

METHODS

National registry and local center data of all deceased donor liver transplants performed between November 2016 and December 2021 were analyzed. All transplants were divided into 4 groups: HCV - DCD, HCV - donation after brain death [DBD], HCV + DCD, and HCV + DBD. The outcome of interest was 1-y graft survival.

RESULTS

Out of 146 liver transplant centers in the United States, liver transplants were not performed from DCD donors, HCV + donors, and a combination of DCD and HCV + donors by 28.7%, 27%, and 70%-72% of centers, respectively. In multivariate analysis, increasing center acceptance ratio was associated with increased utilization of liver grafts from DCD HCV - and DCD HCV antibody-positive nucleic acid test negative donors. Nationally, 1-y graft survival of HCV - DCD liver grafts was lower compared with other groups (89% versus 92% HCV + DCD versus 93% HCV + DBD versus 92% HCV - DBD, log rank P  < 0.0001). There was no difference in 1-y graft survival among groups locally.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver grafts from HCV + DCD donors have 1-y patient and graft survival comparable with DBD liver grafts from donors with or without HCV infection. These results encourage the widespread use of liver grafts from DCD and HCV + donors and standardization of practice in DCD donation to expand the donor pool without compromising short-term outcomes.

Risk scores for allograft failure: Are they still useful in liver recipients from donation after circulatory death?

BACKGROUND

Liver grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) are associated with a higher risk of early graft dysfunction, determined by the warm ischemia and cold ischemia times. It is essential to have precise criteria to identify this complication in order to guide therapeutic strategies.

AIM

To validate different graft and recipient survival scores in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) with DCD grafts.

METHODS

A retrospective and observational unicentric study was conducted on 65 LT patients with grafts obtained from controlled DCD donors from November 2013 to November 2022. The United Kingdom (UK) risk score, early allograft dysfunction (EAD) Olthoff score, and model for early allograft function (MEAF) score were used to evaluate the risk of graft and recipient survival post-transplant. For survival analysis purposes, we used the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences between subgroups were compared using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in the study. The UK risk score did not demonstrate predictive capacity for recipient or graft survival. However, in donors aged over 70 years old (18.4%), it significantly predicted graft survival (P < 0.05). According to Kaplan-Meier survival curves, graft survival rates at 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years in the futility group dramatically decreased to 50% compared to the other groups (log-rank 8.806, P < 0.05). The EAD Olthoff and MEAF scores did not demonstrate predictive capacity for recipient or graft survival. Based on Kaplan-Meier survival curves, patients with a MEAF score ≥ 7 had a lower graft survival rate at 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years compared to patients with a lower MEAF score (log-rank 4.667, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our series, both UK DCD risk score and MEAF score showed predictive capability for graft survival.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.

Normothermic regional perfusion in controlled DCD liver procurement: Outcomes of the Swedish national implementation protocol

Liver transplantation (LTX) using donors after controlled circulatory death (cDCD) is associated with poorer graft survival and increased incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NASs) compared to livers procured from brain-dead donors (DBD). The use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) during cDCD procurement may improve posttransplant outcomes and reduce the incidence of NAS. In Sweden, cDCD LTX was introduced through a national pilot protocol with mandatory NRP. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of cDCD LTX during the pilot period. Donor and recipient data were collected on all cDCD liver transplants during the pilot period between January 2020 to December 2022. Outcome on NAS, patient and graft survival, early allograft dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and comprehensive complication index was compared to a matched cohort of 28 patients transplanted with a DBD liver between 2018 and 2022. Eighteen patients were transplanted with a liver from a cDCD donor after using NRP. The mean functional warm ischemia time was 29 ± 6 minutes. The mean lactate reduction during NRP was 8.7 ± 2.4 mmol/L, and the end NRP perfusate alanine aminotransferase was 1.4 ± 1 µkat/L. When comparing recipients of cDCD liver transplant to DBD, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of NAS, patient and graft survival, comprehensive complication index, early allograft dysfunction, or acute kidney injury. Study protocol magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in cDCD patients showed no signs of subclinical biliary strictures. Evaluation of the Swedish national pilot of cDCD LTX with mandatory NRP shows comparable outcomes to a matched DBD cohort with 94.4% 1-year patient and graft survival and no incidence of NAS within the first year.

Enhancing the usability of older DCD donors through strategic approaches in liver transplantation in the United States

The use of older donors after circulatory death (DCD) for liver transplantation (LT) has increased over the past decade. This study examined whether outcomes of LT using older DCD (≥50 y) have improved with advancements in surgical/perioperative care and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) technology. A total of 7602 DCD LT cases from the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2003-2022) were reviewed. The impact of older DCD donors on graft survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and HR analyses. In all, 1447 LT cases (19.0%) involved older DCD donors. Although there was a decrease in their use from 2003 to 2014, a resurgence was noted after 2015 and reached 21.9% of all LTs in the last 4 years (2019-2022). Initially, 90-day and 1-year graft survivals for older DCDs were worse than younger DCDs, but this difference decreased over time and there was no statistical difference after 2015. Similarly, HRs for graft loss in older DCD have recently become insignificant. In older DCD LT, NMP usage has increased recently, especially in cases with extended donor-recipient distances, while the median time from asystole to aortic cross-clamp has decreased. Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that in the early phase, asystole to cross-clamp time had the highest HR for graft loss in older DCD LT without NMP, while in the later phases, the cold ischemic time (>5.5 h) was a significant predictor. LT outcomes using older DCD donors have become comparable to those from young DCD donors, with recent HRs for graft loss becoming insignificant. The strategic approach in the recent period could mitigate risks, including managing cold ischemic time (≤5.5 h), reducing asystole to cross-clamp time, and adopting NMP for longer distances. Optimal use of older DCD donors may alleviate the donor shortage.

The Association Between the Origin of the Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Recovery Team and Graft Survival: A National Study

Background

Transplant centers have traditionally relied upon procurement teams from their own programs (transplant program procurement team [TPT]) to recover donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers and rarely use surgical procurement teams not affiliated with the recipient center (nontransplant program procurement team [NTPT]). However, in the era of wider geographic organ sharing, greater reliance on NTPTs is often necessary.

Methods

We used national data to study the association between the origin of the donor procurement team (NTPT versus TPT) and the risk of DCD liver allograft failure.

Results

Five hundred NTPT and 2257 TPT DCD transplants were identified: 1-y graft survival was 88.9 and 88.6%, respectively (P = 0.962). In a multivariable model, the origin of the procurement team was not associated with graft failure NTPT versus TPT (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.22; P = 0.57) but rather with known risks for DCD graft loss including donor age, degree of recipient illness, cold ischemic time, and retransplantation. The overall incidence of retransplantation and ischemic cholangiopathy as an indication for retransplantation were similar between NTPT and TPT.

Conclusions

This data suggests that transplant centers may be able to safely use DCD livers recovered by local surgical teams.

Changing Landscape of Open Offers in Liver Transplantation in the Machine Perfusion Era: Exposure, Equity, and Economics

BACKGROUND

Open offers (OOs) in liver transplantation (LT) result from bypassing the traditional allocation system. Little is known about the trends of OOs or the differences in donor/recipient characteristics compared to traditionally placed organs. We aim to quantify modern practices regarding OOs and understand NMP's impact, focusing on social determinants of health (SDH), cost, and graft-associated risk.

METHODS

LTs from 1/1/2018 to 12/31/2023 at a single center were included. NMP was implemented on 10/1/2022. The CDC (centers for disease control)-validated social vulnerability index (SVI) and donor risk index (DRI) were calculated. Comprehensive complications index (CCI), Clavien-Dindo grades, patient and graft survival, and costs of transplantation were included.

RESULTS

1162 LTs were performed; 193 (16.8%) from OOs. OOs were more common in the post-NMP era (26.5% vs. 13.3%, p < 0.001). Pre-NMP, patients receiving OOs had longer waitlist times (118 vs. 69 days, p < 0.001), lower MELDs (17 vs. 25 points, p < 0.001), and riskier grafts (DRI = 1.8 vs. 1.6, p = 0.004) compared to standard offers. Post-NMP, recipients receiving OOs demonstrated no difference in waitlist time (27 vs. 20 days, p = 0.21) or graft risk (DRI = 2.03 vs. 2.23, p = 0.17). OO recipient MELD remained lower (16 vs. 22, p < 0.001). OO recipients were more socially vulnerable (SVI), pre-NMP (0.41 vs. 0.36, p = 0.004), but less vulnerable after NMP (0.23 vs. 0.36, p = 0.019). Despite increased graft risk, pre-NMP OO-LTs were less expensive in the 90-day global period ($154 939 vs. $178 970, p = 0.002) and the 180-days pre-/post-LT ($208 807 vs. $228 091, p = 0.021). Cost trends remained similar with NMP.

CONCLUSION

OOs are increasingly utilized and may be appealing due to demonstrated cost reductions even with NMP. Although most OO-related metrics in our center remain similar before and after machine perfusion, programs should take caution that increasing use does not worsen organ access for socially vulnerable populations.

Liver function maximum capacity test during normothermic regional perfusion predicts graft function after transplantation

Purpose

In an effort to reduce waitlist mortality, extended criteria donor organs, including those from donation after circulatory death (DCD), are being used with increasing frequency. These donors carry an increased risk for postoperative complications, and balancing donor-recipient risks is currently based on generalized nomograms. Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (aNRP) enables individual evaluation of DCD organs, but a gold standard to determine suitability for transplantation is lacking. This study aimed to incorporate individualized and predictive measurements of the liver maximum capacity (LiMAx) test to objectively grade liver function during aNRP and prevent post-op complications.

Methods

aNRP was performed to salvage 18 DCD liver grafts, otherwise discarded. Continuous variables were presented as the median with the interquartile range.

Results

The liver function maximum capacity (LiMAx) test was successfully performed within the aNRP circuit in 17 aNRPs (94%). Donor livers with good lactate clearance during aNRP demonstrated significantly higher LiMAx scores (396 (301-451) µg/kg/h versus those who did not 105 (70-158) µg/kg/h; P = 0.006). This was also true for manifesting stress hyperglycemia > 20 mmol/l (P = 0.032). LiMAx score correlated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT; R =  - 0.755) and aspartate transaminase (AST; R =  - 0.800) levels during perfusion and distinguished livers that were selected for transplantation (397 (346-453) µg/kg/h) from those who were discarded (155 (87-206) µg/kg/h; P < 0.001). Twelve livers were accepted for transplantation, blinded for LiMAx results, and all had LiMAx scores of > 241 µg/kg/h. Postoperatively, LiMAx during aNRP displayed correlation with 24-h lactate levels.

Conclusions

This study shows for the first time the feasibility to assess liver function during aNRP in individual donor livers. LiMAx presents an objective tool to predict donor liver function and risk of complications in the recipient, thus enabling individualized matching of donor livers for an individual recipient. The LiMAx test may present a valuable test for the prediction of donor liver function, preventing post-transplant complication, and personalizing the selection of donor livers for individual recipients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00371-7.

[Organ donation and organ assessment after primary circulatory death and secondary brain death]

BACKGROUND

The global organ shortage is the biggest obstacle to expand urgently needed liver transplantation activities. In addition to donation after brain death (DBD), donation after primary circulatory death (DCD) has also been introduced in many European countries to increase the number of donated organs.

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes the legal and ethical aspects of DCD, the practical donation process of DCD, the clinical results of DCD liver transplantation with a special focus on organ assessment before a planned DCD liver transplantation.

RESULTS

In Europe 11 countries have active DCD liver transplantation programs and a total of 1230 DCD liver transplantations were performed in Europe in 2023. The highest proportion of DCD liver transplantations were recorded in Belgium (52.8%), the Netherlands (42.8%) and Switzerland (32.1%). The adequate selection of donors and recipients is crucial in DCD transplantation and the use of DCD livers particularly depends on the preparedness of the healthcare system for routine machine perfusion. The leaders are Belgium, France and Italy which implant around 68-74% of DCD organs. With an adequate organ assessment, the long-term results of DBD and DCD liver transplantations are comparable. To assess mitochondrial damage and thus organ quality, hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) was introduced and has the secondary benefit of mitochondrial protection through oxygenation. The establishment of aerobic metabolism in mitochondria under hypothermia leads to a reduction of toxic metabolites and the restoration of ATP storage, which subsequently leads to a reperfusion light during implantation.

CONCLUSION

Expanding the donor pool with DCD donors can counteract the global organ shortage. With adequate patient selection and routine organ assessment short-term and also long-term outcomes of DBD and DCD liver transplantation are comparable.

Impact of Back-to-Base Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Complications and Costs: A Multicenter, Real-World Risk-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Assess cost and complication outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) using normothermic machine perfusion (NMP).

BACKGROUND

End-ischemic NMP is often used to aid logistics, yet its impact on outcomes after LT remains unclear, as does its true impact on costs associated with transplantation.

METHODS

Deceased donor liver recipients at 2 centers (January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2023) were included. Retransplants, splits, and combined grafts were excluded. End-ischemic NMP (OrganOx-Metra) was implemented in October 2022 for extended-criteria donation after brain death (DBDs), all donations after circulatory deaths (DCDs), and logistics. NMP cases were matched 1:2 with static cold storage controls (SCS) using the Balance-of-Risk [donation after brain death (DBD)-grafts] and UK-DCD Score (DCD-grafts).

RESULTS

Overall, 803 transplantations were included, 174 (21.7%) receiving NMP. Matching was achieved between 118 NMP-DBDs with 236 SCS; and 37 NMP-DCD with 74 corresponding SCS. For both graft types, median inpatient comprehensive complications index values were comparable between groups. DCD-NMP grafts experienced reduced cumulative 90-day comprehensive complications index (27.6 vs 41.9, P =0.028). NMP also reduced the need for early relaparotomy and renal replacement therapy, with subsequently less frequent major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IVa). This effect was more pronounced in DCD transplants. NMP had no protective effect on early biliary complications. Organ acquisition/preservation costs were higher with NMP, yet NMP-treated grafts had lower 90-day pretransplant costs in the context of shorter waiting list times. Overall costs were comparable for both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first risk-adjusted outcome and cost analysis comparing NMP and SCS. In addition to logistical benefits, NMP was associated with a reduction in relaparotomy and bleeding in DBD grafts, and overall complications and post-LT renal replacement for DCDs. While organ acquisition/preservation was more costly with NMP, overall 90-day health care costs-per-transplantation were comparable.

Viability assessment of the liver during ex-situ machine perfusion prior to transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In an attempt to reduce waiting list mortality in liver transplantation, less-than-ideal quality donor livers from extended criteria donors are increasingly accepted. Predicting the outcome of these organs remains a challenge. Machine perfusion provides the unique possibility to assess donor liver viability pretransplantation and predict postreperfusion organ function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Assessing liver viability during hypothermic machine perfusion remains challenging, as the liver is not metabolically active. Nevertheless, the levels of flavin mononucleotide, transaminases, lactate dehydrogenase, glucose and pH in the perfusate have proven to be predictors of liver viability. During normothermic machine perfusion, the liver is metabolically active and in addition to the perfusate levels of pH, transaminases, glucose and lactate, the production of bile is a crucial criterion for hepatocyte viability. Cholangiocyte viability can be determined by analyzing bile composition. The differences between perfusate and bile levels of pH, bicarbonate and glucose are good predictors of freedom from ischemic cholangiopathy.

SUMMARY

Although consensus is lacking regarding precise cut-off values during machine perfusion, there is general consensus on the importance of evaluating both hepatocyte and cholangiocyte compartments. The challenge is to reach consensus for increased organ utilization, while at the same time pushing the boundaries by expanding the possibilities for viability testing.

Cold ischemia time in liver transplantation: An overview

The standard approach to organ preservation in liver transplantation is by static cold storage and the time between the cross-clamping of a graft in a donor and its reperfusion in the recipient is defined as cold ischemia time (CIT). This simple definition reveals a multifactorial time frame that depends on donor hepatectomy time, transit time, and recipient surgery time, and is one of the most important donor-related risk factors which may influence the graft and recipient's survival. Recently, the growing demand for the use of marginal liver grafts has prompted scientific exploration to analyze ischemia time factors and develop different organ preservation strategies. This review details the CIT definition and analyzes its different factors. It also explores the most recent strategies developed to implement each timestamp of CIT and to protect the graft from ischemic injury.

Portal vein arterialization in 25 liver transplant recipients: A Latin American single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Portal vein arterialization (PVA) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to maximize oxygen delivery when arterial circulation is compromised or has been used as an alternative reperfusion technique for complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of PVA on portal perfusion and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has not been assessed.

AIM

To examine the outcomes of patients who required PVA in correlation with their LT procedure.

METHODS

All patients receiving PVA and LT at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. To account for the time-sensitive effects of graft perfusion, patients were classified into two groups: prereperfusion (pre-PVA), if the arterioportal anastomosis was performed before graft revascularization, and postreperfusion (post-PVA), if PVA was performed afterward. The pre-PVA rationale contemplated poor portal hemodynamics, severe vascular steal, or PVT. Post-PVA was considered if graft hypoperfusion became evident. Conservative interventions were attempted before PVA.

RESULTS

A total of 25 cases were identified: 15 before and 10 after graft reperfusion. Pre-PVA patients were more affected by diabetes, decompensated cirrhosis, impaired portal vein (PV) hemodynamics, and PVT. PGD was less common after pre-PVA (20.0% vs 60.0%) (P = 0.041). Those who developed PGD had a smaller increase in PV velocity (25.00 cm/s vs 73.42 cm/s) (P = 0.036) and flow (1.31 L/min vs 3.34 L/min) (P = 0.136) after arterialization. Nine patients required PVA closure (median time: 62 d). Pre-PVA and non-PGD cases had better survival rates than their counterparts (56.09 months vs 22.77 months and 54.15 months vs 31.91 months, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest report presenting PVA in LT. Results suggest that pre-PVA provides better graft perfusion than post-PVA. Graft hyperperfusion could play a protective role against PGD.

Outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in donation after circulatory death compared with donation after brain death: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Due to organ shortages, liver transplantation (LT) using donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD) grafts has become more common. There is limited and conflicting evidence on LT outcomes using DCD grafts compared to those using donation-after-brain death (DBD) grafts for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to summarize the current evidence on the outcomes of DCD-LT and DBD-LT in patients with HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Online databases were searched for studies comparing DCD-LT and DBD-LT outcomes in patients with HCC and a meta-analysis was conducted using fixed- or random-effects models.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 487 (33.4%) HCC DCD-LT patients and 973 (66.6%) DBD-LT patients were included. The meta-analysis showed comparable 1-year [relative risk (RR)=0.99, 95%CI:0.95 to 1.03, p=0.53] and 3-year [RR=0.99, 95%CI:0.89 to 1.09, p=0.79] recurrence-free survival. The corresponding 1-year [RR=0.98, 95%CI:0.93 to 1.03, p=0.35] and 3-year [RR=0.94, 95%CI:0.87 to 1.01, p=0.08] patient survival and 1-year [RR=0.91, 95%CI:0.71 to 1.16, p=0.43] and 3-year [RR=0.92, 95%CI:0.67 to 1.26, p=0.59] graft survival were also comparable. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts regarding the tumor characteristics, donor/recipient risk factors and the incidence of post-operative complications, including acute rejection, primary non-function, biliary complications and retransplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, it has been found that comparable outcomes can be achieved in HCC patients using DCD-LT compared to DBD-LT, particularly when employing good quality graft, strict donor and recipient selection, and effective surgical management. The decision to utilize DCD-LT for HCC patients should be personalized, taking into consideration the risk of post-LT HCC recurrence. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023445812).

Risk assessment in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a two-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-established treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there are ongoing debates regarding outcomes and selection. This study examines the experience of LT for HCC at a high-volume centre.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was used to identify HCC patients undergoing LT from 2000 to 2020 with more than or equal to 3-years follow-up. Data were obtained from the centre database and electronic medical records. The Metroticket 2.0 HCC-specific 5-year survival scale was calculated for each patient. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses were employed assessing survival between groups based on Metroticket score and individual donor and recipient risk factors.

RESULTS

Five hundred sixty-nine patients met criteria. Median follow-up was 96.2 months (8.12 years; interquartile range 59.9-147.8). Three-year recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 88.6% ( n =504) and 86.6% ( n =493). Five-year RFS and OS were 78.9% ( n =449) and 79.1% ( n =450). Median Metroticket 2.0 score was 0.9 (interquartile range 0.9-0.95). Tumour size greater than 3 cm ( P =0.012), increasing tumour number on imaging ( P =0.001) and explant pathology ( P <0.001) was associated with recurrence. Transplant within Milan ( P <0.001) or UCSF criteria ( P <0.001) had lower recurrence rates. Increasing alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-values were associated with more HCC recurrence ( P <0.001) and reduced OS ( P =0.008). Chemoembolization was predictive of recurrence in the overall population ( P =0.043) and in those outside-Milan criteria ( P =0.038). A receiver-operator curve using Metroticket 2.0 identified an optimal cut-off of projected survival greater than or equal to 87.5% for predicting recurrence. This cut-off was able to predict RFS ( P <0.001) in the total cohort and predict both, RFS ( P =0.007) and OS ( P =0.016) outside Milan. Receipt of donation after brain death (DBD) grafts (55/478, 13%) or living-donor grafts (3/22, 13.6%) experienced better survival rates compared to donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts ( n =15/58, 25.6%, P =0.009). Donor age was associated with a higher HCC recurrence ( P =0.006). Both total ischaemia time (TIT) greater than 6hours ( P =0.016) and increasing TIT correlated with higher HCC recurrence ( P =0.027). The use of DCD grafts for outside-Milan candidates was associated with increased recurrence ( P =0.039) and reduced survival ( P =0.033).

CONCLUSION

This large two-centre analysis confirms favourable outcomes after LT for HCC. Tumour size and number, pre-transplant AFP, and Milan criteria remain important recipient HCC-risk factors. A higher donor risk (i.e. donor age, DCD grafts, ischaemia time) was associated with poorer outcomes.

Futility and poor outcomes are not the same thing: A clinical perspective of refined outcomes definitions in liver transplantation

The term "futility" in liver transplantation is used inappropriately and inaccurately, as it is frequently applied to patient populations with suboptimal outcomes that are often not truly "futile." The term "futile" is used interchangeably with poor outcomes. Not all poor outcomes fulfill a definition of futility when considering all viewpoints. Definitions of "futility" are variable throughout the medical literature. We review futility in the context of liver transplantation, encompassing various viewpoints, with a goal to propose focused outcome definitions, including futility, that encompass broader viewpoints, and improve the utilization of "futility" to truly futile situations, and improve communication between providers and patients/families. Focused, appropriate definitions will help the transplant community develop better models to more accurately predict and avoid futile transplants, and better predict an individual patient's posttransplant outcome.

Current Techniques and Indications for Machine Perfusion and Regional Perfusion in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation

Since the advent of University of Wisconsin preservation solution in the 1980s, clinicians have learned to work within its confines. While affording improved outcomes, considerable limitations still exist and contribute to the large number of livers that go unused each year, often for fear they may never work. The last 10 years have seen the widespread availability of new perfusion modalities which provide an opportunity for assessing organ viability and prolonged organ storage. This review will discuss the role of in situ normothermic regional perfusion for livers donated after circulatory death. It will also describe the different modalities of ex situ perfusion, both normothermic and hypothermic, and discuss how they are thought to work and the opportunities afforded by them.

Strategies to Improve the Utilization and Function of DCD Livers

Despite the increased usage of livers from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors in the last decade, many patients remaining on the waitlist who need a liver transplant. Recent efforts have focused on maximizing the utilization and outcomes of these allografts using advances in machine perfusion technology and other perioperative strategies such as normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). In addition to the standard donor and recipient matching that is required with DCD donation, new data regarding the impact of graft steatosis, extensive European experience with NRP, and the increasing use of normothermic and hypothermic machine perfusion have shown immense potential in increasing DCD organ overall utilization and improved outcomes. These techniques, along with viability testing of extended criteria donors, have generated early promising data to consider the use of higher-risk donor organs and more widespread adoption of these techniques in the United States. This review explores the most recent international literature regarding strategies to optimize the utilization and outcomes of DCD liver allografts, including donor-recipient matching, perioperative strategies including NRP versus rapid controlled DCD recovery, viability assessment of discarded livers, and postoperative strategies including machine perfusion versus pharmacologic interventions.

Current Understanding of Marginal Grafts in Liver Transplantation

End-stage liver disease (ESLD), stemming from a spectrum of chronic liver pathologies including chronic liver failure, acute cirrhosis decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma, imposes a significant global healthcare burden. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only treatment for ESLD. However, the escalating mortality on transplant waitlists has prompted the utilization of marginal liver grafts in LT procedures. These grafts primarily encompass elderly livers, steatotic livers, livers from donation after circulatory death, split livers and those infected with the hepatitis virus. While the expansion of the donor pool offers promise, it also introduces concomitant risks. These encompass graft failure, biliary and cardiovascular complications, the recurrence of liver disease and reduced patient and graft survival. Consequently, various established strategies, ranging from improved donor-recipient matching to surgical interventions, have emerged to mitigate these risks. This article undertakes a comprehensive assessment of the current landscape, evaluating the viability of diverse marginal liver grafts. Additionally, it synthesizes approaches aimed at enhancing the quality of such marginal liver grafts. The overarching objective is to augment the donor pool and ameliorate the risk factors associated with the shortage of liver grafts.

Role of Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation

Given the current severe shortage of available livers for transplantation, there is an urgent need to maximize the utilization of donor organs. One of the strategies to increase the number of available livers for transplantation is to improve organ utilization through the use of elderly, overweight, or organs donated after circulatory death. However, the utilization of these "marginal" organs was associated with an increased risk of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, ischemic biliary complications, or even re-transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of these complications.

Treatment of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Including Transplantation

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a progressive cholestatic liver disease that causes stricturing of the intra and extrahepatic bile ducts that can lead to cirrhosis and end stage liver disease. Effective medical therapy has been elusive, but a course of ursodeoxycholic acid may be prescribed at doses of 17-23 mg/kg/day for up to a year to determine if a reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase is observed. A number of drugs are under investigation, including FXR agonists with choleretic and antimicrobial properties. Liver transplantation for PSC has one of the highest survival rates, but recurrent PSC is seen in up to 25% of recipients.

Extended criteria liver donation after circulatory death with prolonged warm ischemia: a pilot experience of normothermic regional perfusion and no subsequent ex-situ machine perfusion

BACKGROUND

Livers from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) with very prolonged warm ischemic time (WIT) are regularly transplanted after abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (aNRP) plus ex-situ machine perfusion (MP). Considering aNRP as in-situ MP, we investigated whether the results of a pilot experience of extended criteria cDCD liver transplantation (LT) with prolonged WIT, with aNRP alone, were comparable to the best possible outcomes in low-risk cDCD LT.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data on 24 cDCD LT, with aNRP alone, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median total and asystolic WIT were 51 and 25 min. Measures within benchmark cut-offs were: median duration of surgery (5.9 h); median intraoperative transfusions (3 units of red blood cells); need for renal replacement therapy (2/24 patients); median intensive care stay (3 days); key complications; overall morbidity, graft loss, and retransplantation up to 12 months; 12-month mortality (2/21 patients). The median hospital stay (33 days, due to logistics) and mortality up to 6 months (2/24 patients, due to graft-unrelated causes) exceeded benchmark thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot experience suggests that livers from cDCD with very prolonged WIT that appear viable during adequate quality aNRP may be safely transplanted, with no need for ex-situ MP, with considerable resource savings.

Age and liver graft: a systematic review with meta-regression

Increasing organ shortage results in extended criteria donors (ECD) being used to face the growing demand for liver grafts. The demographic change leads to greater use of elderly donors for liver transplantation, historically considered marginal donors. Age is still considered amongst ECD in liver transplantation as it could affect transplant outcomes. However, what is the cutoff for donor age is still unclear and debated. A search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library was performed. The primary outcome was 1-year graft survival (GS). The secondary outcome was overall biliary complications and 3-5 years of graft and overall survival. A meta-regression model was used to analyse the temporal trend relation in the survival outcome. The meta-analysis included 11 studies. Hazard ratios for 1-year (age cutoff of 70 and 80,) and 5-year GS (I2:0%) were similar irrespectively of the age group. The meta-regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the 1-year graft survival and the year of publication. (coef. 0.00027, 95% CI - 0.0001 to - 0.0003 p = 0.0009). Advanced-age donors showed an increased risk of overall biliary complications with an odd ratio (OR) of 1.89 (95% CI 1-3.65). Liver grafts potentially discharged because of high-risk failure show encouraging results, and GS in ECD has progressively improved with a temporal trend. Currently, the criteria of marginality vary amongst centres. Age alone cannot be considered amongst the extended criteria. First of all, because of the positive results in terms of septuagenarian graft survival. Moreover, the potential elderly donor-related adjunctive risk can be balanced by reducing other risk factors. A prospective multicentre study should investigate a multi-factorial model based on donor criteria, recipient features and new functional biomarkers to predict graft outcome, as proper donor-recipient matching seems to be the critical point for good outcomes.

Older liver grafts from donation after circulatory death are associated with impaired survival and higher incidence of biliary non-anastomotic stricture

BACKGROUND

Grafts from older donors after circulatory death were associated with inferior outcome in liver transplants in the past. But it has seemed to remain controversial in the last decade, as a result of modified clinical protocols, selected recipients, and advanced technology of organ perfusion and preservation. The present study aimed to examine the impact of older donor age on complications and survival of liver transplant using grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD).

METHODS

A total of 944 patients who received DCD liver transplantation from 2015 to 2020 were included and divided into two groups: using graft from older donor (aged ≥ 65 years, n = 87) and younger donor (age < 65 years, n = 857). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to eliminate selection bias.

RESULTS

A progressively increased proportion of liver transplants with grafts from older donors was observed from 1.68% to 15.44% during the study period. The well-balanced older donor (n = 79) and younger donor (n = 79) were 1:1 matched. There were significantly more episodes of biliary non-anastomotic stricture (NAS) in the older donor group than the younger donor group [15/79 (19.0%) vs. 6/79 (7.6%); P = 0.017]. The difference did not reach statistical significance regarding early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and primary non-function (PNF). Older livers had a trend toward inferior 1-, 2-, 3-year graft and overall survival compared with younger livers, but these differences were not statistically significant (63.1%, 57.6%, 57.6% vs. 76.9%, 70.2%, 67.7%, P = 0.112; 64.4%, 58.6%, 58.6% vs. 76.9%, 72.2%, 72.2%, P = 0.064). The only risk factor for poor survival was ABO incompatible transplant (P = 0.008) in the older donor group. In the subgroup of ABO incompatible cases, it demonstrated a significant difference in the rate of NAS between the older donor group and the younger donor group [6/8 (75.0%) vs. 3/14 (21.4%); P = 0.014].

CONCLUSIONS

Transplants with grafts from older donors (aged ≥ 65 years) after circulatory death are more frequently associated with inferior outcome compared to those from younger donors. Older grafts from DCD are more likely to develop NAS, especially in ABO incompatible cases.

The British transplantation society guidelines on organ donation from deceased donors after circulatory death

Recipient outcomes after transplantation with organs from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors can compare favourably and even match recipient outcomes after transplantation with organs from donation after brain death donors. Success is dependent upon establishing common practices and accepted protocols that allow the safe sharing of DCD organs and maximise the use of the DCD donor pool. The British Transplantation Society 'Guideline on transplantation from deceased donors after circulatory death' has recently been updated. This manuscript summarises the relevant recommendations from chapters specifically related to organ donation.

Outcomes of liver transplantation with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion: a matched-controlled initial experience in Spain

Thoracoabdominal (TA) normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) should allow the safe recovery of heart and liver grafts simultaneously in the context of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD). We present the initial results of cDCD liver transplantation with simultaneous liver and heart procurement in Spain until October 2021. Outcomes were compared with a matched cohort of cDCD with abdominal NRP (A-NRP) from participating institutions. Primary endpoints comprised early allograft dysfunction (EAD) or primary non-function (PNF), and the development of ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL). Six transplants were performed using cDCD with TA-NRP during the study period. Donors were significantly younger in the TA-NRP group than in the A-NRP group (median 45.6 years and 62.9 years respectively, p = 0.011), with a median functional warm ischemia time of 12.5 min in the study group and 13 min in the control group. Patient characteristics, procurement times, and surgical baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. No patient in the study group developed EAD or PNF, and over a median follow-up of 9.8 months, none developed ITBL or graft loss. Extending A-NRP to TA-NRP for cardiac procurement may be technically challenging, but it is both feasible and safe, showing comparable postoperative outcomes to A-NRP.

Complications in Post-Liver Transplant Patients

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for liver failure and selected cases of malignancies. Transplantation activity has increased over the years, and indications for LT have been widened, leading to organ shortage. To face this condition, a high selection of recipients with prioritizing systems and an enlargement of the donor pool were necessary. Several authors published their case series reporting the results obtained with the use of marginal donors, which seem to have progressively improved over the years. The introduction of in situ and ex situ machine perfusion, although still strongly debated, and better knowledge and treatment of the complications may have a role in achieving better results. With longer survival rates, a significant number of patients will suffer from long-term complications. An extensive review of the literature concerning short- and long-term outcomes is reported trying to highlight the most recent findings. The heterogeneity of the behaviors within the different centers is evident, leading to a difficult comparison of the results and making explicit the need to obtain more consent from experts.

Early patient and liver allograft outcomes from donation after circulatory death donors using thoracoabdominal normothermic regional: a multi-center observational experience

Background

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts are associated with higher rates of primary non-function (PNF) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Advanced recovery techniques, including thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP), may improve organ utilization and patient and allograft outcomes. Given the increasing US experience with TA-NRP DCD recovery, we evaluated outcomes of DCD liver allografts transplanted after TA-NRP.

Methods

Liver allografts transplanted from DCD donors after TA-NRP were identified from 5/1/2021 to 1/31/2022 across 8 centers. Donor data included demographics, functional warm ischemic time (fWIT), total warm ischemia time (tWIT) and total time on TA-NRP. Recipient data included demographics, model of end stage liver disease (MELD) score, etiology of liver disease, PNF, cold ischemic time (CIT), liver function tests, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), post-operative transplant related complications.

Results

The donors' median age was 32 years old and median BMI was 27.4. Median fWIT was 20.5 min; fWIT exceeded 30 min in two donors. Median time to initiation of TA-NRP was 4 min and median time on bypass was 66 min. The median recipient listed MELD and MELD at transplant were 22 and 21, respectively. Median allograft CIT was 292 min. The median length of follow up was 257 days. Median ICU and hospital LOS were 2 and 7 days, respectively. Three recipients required management of anastomotic biliary strictures. No patients demonstrated IC, PNF or required re-transplantation.

Conclusion

Liver allografts from TA-NRP DCD donors demonstrated good early allograft and recipient outcomes.

Beyond the Concepts of Elder and Marginal in DCD Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Observational Matched-Cohort Study in the Italian Clinical Setting

Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) is a valuable strategy to increase the availability of grafts for liver transplantation (LT). As the average age of populations rises, the donor pool is likely to be affected by a potential increase in DCD donor age in the near future. We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate post-transplantation outcomes in recipients of grafts from elderly DCD donors compared with younger DCD donors, and elderly donors after brainstem determination of death (DBD). From August 2020 to May 2022, consecutive recipients of deceased donor liver-only transplants were enrolled in the study. DCD recipients were propensity score matched 1:3 to DBD recipients. One-hundred fifty-seven patients were included, 26 of whom (16.6%) were transplanted with a DCD liver graft. After propensity score matching and stratification, three groups were obtained: 15 recipients of DCD donors ≥75 years, 11 recipients of DCD donors <75 years, and 28 recipients of DBD donors ≥75 years. Short-term outcomes, as well as 12 months graft survival rates (93.3%, 100%, and 89.3% respectively), were comparable among the groups. LT involving grafts retrieved from very elderly DCD donors was feasible and safe in an experienced high-volume center, with outcomes comparable to LTs from younger DCD donors and age-matched DBD donors.

DCD liver transplant in patients with a MELD over 35

Introduction

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT) makes up well less than 1% of all LTs with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)≥35 in the United States. We hypothesized DCD-LT yields acceptable ischemia-reperfusion and reasonable outcomes for recipients with MELD≥35.

Methods

We analyzed recipients with lab-MELD≥35 at transplant within the UCSF (n=41) and the UNOS (n=375) cohorts using multivariate Cox regression and propensity score matching.

Results

In the UCSF cohort, five-year patient survival was 85% for DCD-LTs and 86% for matched-Donation after Brain Death donors-(DBD) LTs (p=0.843). Multivariate analyses showed that younger donor/recipient age and more recent transplants (2011-2021 versus 1999-2010) were associated with better survival. DCD vs. DBD graft use did not significantly impact survival (HR: 1.2, 95%CI 0.6-2.7). The transaminase peak was approximately doubled, indicating suggesting an increased ischemia-reperfusion hit. DCD-LTs had a median post-LT length of stay of 11 days, and 34% (14/41) were on dialysis at discharge versus 12 days and 22% (9/41) for DBD-LTs. 27% (11/41) DCD-LTs versus 12% (5/41) DBD-LTs developed a biliary complication (p=0.095). UNOS cohort analysis confirmed patient survival predictors, but DCD graft emerged as a risk factor (HR: 1.5, 95%CI 1.3-1.9) with five-year patient survival of 65% versus 75% for DBD-LTs (p=0.016). This difference became non-significant in a sub-analysis focusing on MELD 35-36 recipients. Analysis of MELD≥35 DCD recipients showed that donor age of <30yo independently reduced the risk of graft loss by 30% (HR, 95%CI: 0.7 (0.9-0.5), p=0.019). Retransplant status was associated with a doubled risk of adverse event (HR, 95%CI: 2.1 (1.4-3.3), p=0.001). The rejection rates at 1y were similar between DCD- and DBD-LTs, (9.3% (35/375) versus 1,541 (8.7% (1,541/17,677), respectively).

Discussion

In highly selected recipient/donor pair, DCD transplantation is feasible and can achieve comparable survival to DBD transplantation. Biliary complications occurred at the expected rates. In the absence of selection, DCD-LTs outcomes remain worse than those of DBD-LTs.