An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A limited number of drugs are used as standard or alternative therapies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). No specific recommendations are available for patients failing to respond to these therapies. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with AIH.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective study of 42 patients with AIH who received infliximab at 21 liver centers in 12 countries. Patients were categorized according to the reason for infliximab therapy. Patients in group 1 (n=20) had failed standard, second-line (mycophenolate mofetil and 6-mercaptopurine) or third-line (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) therapy. In group 2 (n=22), infliximab was given for treatment of concomitant extrahepatic autoimmune diseases. Patients received a median of 17 (range: 3-104) infliximab infusions. Complete biochemical response (CR) was achieved or maintained in 33 (78%) patients during infliximab therapy. In group 1, infliximab induced CR in 11 of 20 (55%) patients. In group 2, 16 patients with CR prior to infliximab maintained remission, and the remaining 6 patients with active AIH (5 on standard and 1 on both second-line and third-line therapy) showed CR following infliximab therapy. Infliximab led to CR in 75% (6/8) of nonresponders to second-line and in 46% (6/13) of failing third-line therapy. Overall, 65% (17/26) of the patients with active AIH achieved CR on infliximab. Infliximab was discontinued in 3 patients of group 1. One patient had a severe allergic reaction and 2 developed anti-infliximab autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that infliximab may be an effective and safe rescue therapy in AIH.

MMF Is an Effective and Safer Treatment Options for Treatment-Naïve Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis Compared to Azathioprine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease with significant morbidity and mortality if untreated. Current first-line treatment involves corticosteroids and azathioprine (AZA), which are effective but are associated with significant adverse effects and treatment intolerance. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressive agent with a potentially better safety profile, has emerged as an alternative. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMF compared to AZA in treatment-naïve AIH patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases were searched for articles published up to May 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan, employing a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 621 patients were included. MMF showed significantly higher rates of complete biochemical response compared to AZA (odds ratio [OR] 3.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-6.40, p < 0.00001) and lower non-response rates (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.85, p = 0.01). Corticosteroid withdrawal rates were also higher in the MMF group (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.69-4.94, p = 0.0001). Relapse rate and cumulative prednisolone dose were comparable between the two groups. MMF demonstrated a better safety profile, with significantly lower rates of gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.79, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

MMF shows superior efficacy and tolerability compared to AZA in treatment-naïve AIH patients and may serve as a preferred first-line therapy, offering improved patient adherence and clinical outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology which may affect any patient irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. At baseline, the clinical spectrum of the disease varies largely from asymptomatic cases to acute liver failure with massive hepatocyte necrosis. The aim of these EASL guidelines is to provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management of AIH both in adults and children. Updated guidance on the management of patients with variants and specific forms of AIH is also provided, as is detailed guidance on the management of AIH-associated cirrhosis, including surveillance for portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

Update in clinical science: Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an enigmatic, relatively rare disease with a variable spectrum of presentation whose pathogenesis, diagnosis and management remain a major challenge. We have performed a review of recent developments in basic science, epidemiology, clinical science, therapeutics, and regulatory science, evaluating the challenges associated with the application of translational research and clinical trial design to a condition that is a chameleon in nature, where outcomes range from relatively benign disease through cirrhosis and acute liver failure. This review is focused on developments from 2020 onwards so we can present a forward-looking view on the challenges and remaining questions that must be addressed to improve patient care and outcomes in AIH. We also outline areas of debate and offer insights into these areas.

New Therapeutic Challenges in Pediatric Gastroenterology: A Narrative Review

Pediatric gastroenterology is entering a pivotal phase marked by significant challenges and emerging opportunities in treating conditions like celiac disease (CeD), eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) pose significant clinical hurdles, but new therapeutic avenues are emerging. Advances in precision medicine, particularly proteomics, are reshaping care by tailoring treatments to individual patient characteristics. For CeD, therapies like gluten-degrading enzymes (latiglutenase, Kuma030) and zonulin inhibitors (larazotide acetate) show promise, though clinical outcomes are inconsistent. Immunotherapy and microbiota modulation, including probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), are also under exploration, with potential benefits in symptom management. Transglutaminase 2 inhibitors like ZED-1227 could help prevent gluten-induced damage. Monoclonal antibodies targeting immune pathways, such as AMG 714 and larazotide acetate, require further validation in pediatric populations. In EoE, biologics like dupilumab, cendakimab, dectrekumab (IL-13 inhibitors), and mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab (IL-5/IL-5R inhibitors) show varying efficacy, while thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) inhibitors like tezepelumab are also being investigated. These therapies require more pediatric-specific research to optimize their use. For IBD, biologics like vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab, as well as small molecules like tofacitinib, etrasimod, and upadacitinib, are emerging treatments. New medications for individuals with refractory or steroid-dependent AIH have been explored. Personalized therapy, integrating precision medicine, therapeutic drug monitoring, and lifestyle changes, is increasingly guiding pediatric IBD management. This narrative review explores recent breakthroughs in treating CeD, EoE, IBD, and AIH, with a focus on pediatric studies when available, and discusses the growing role of proteomics in advancing personalized gastroenterological care.

Response to azathioprine treatment in autoimmune hepatitis is dependent on glutathione transferase genotypes

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine (AZA) is part of the standard treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The first step in the complex bioconversion of AZA to active metabolites is mediated by glutathione transferases (GSTs).

AIMS

Elucidate the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 copy number variation (CNV), genetic variation in GSTA2, GSTP1, and inosine-triphosphate-pyrophosphatase, and the response to AZA in AIH.

METHODS

Genotyping was performed in AIH patients (n = 131) on AZA, and in a Swedish background population (n = 283). Thiopurine metabolites in blood erythrocytes were determined by high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

GSTM1 and GSTT1 CNV were associated with treatment response to AZA. Gene deletion of GSTM1-but not of GSTT1-was associated with the liver transaminase levels. None of the studied genetic variants were associated with the thiopurine metabolite concentrations, suggesting non-enzymatic mechanisms of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in the context of AZA efficacy in AIH. The prevalence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 CNV genotypes was similar in AIH and in the background population.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the effects of GSTM1 and GSTT1 CNV on AZA efficacy in AIH, not previously described. It also elaborates on the impact of the definition of treatment response, on the importance of the various GSTs studied. Furthermore, the GSTM1 and GSTT1 CNV frequencies previously reported in European populations were confirmed.

Natural history and long-term management of autoimmune hepatitis

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively infrequent and complex liver disease characterized by acute or chronic inflammation, interface hepatitis in histology examination, elevation of immunoglobulin G (IgG), production of autoantibodies, and is often responsive to immunosuppression. The incidence of AIH has been increasing worldwide, affecting people of all ages and sexes. AIH represents a diagnostic challenge because of its heterogeneous presentation and the lack of pathognomonic findings. Even when treated, AIH can remain a progressive disease. In this review, we present recent data on the natural history of AIH and the developing evidence on the management of patients with AIH.

AREAS COVERED

This review outlines the clinical presentation, risk factors linked to poorer clinical outcomes, the diagnostic algorithm, and the current management strategies for individuals living with AIH.

EXPERT OPINION

AIH remains a clinical challenge, and new tools for better diagnosis and stratification of risk are needed. In addition, better treatments are needed as a complete response is achieved in less than 60% of cases, and intolerance to first-line treatment is frequent. The use of biological treatment in AIH seems to improve the response rate and minimize the risk of side effects of current medication in this increasingly prevalent disease.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease which, if untreated, often leads to cirrhosis, liver failure and death. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of AIH was published in 2011. Since then, our understanding of AIH has advanced in many areas. This update to the previous guideline was commissioned by the BSG and developed by a multidisciplinary group. The aim of this guideline is to review and summarise the current evidence, in order to inform and guide diagnosis and management of patients with AIH and its variant syndromes. The main focus is on AIH in adults, but the guidelines should also be relevant to older children and adolescents.

Recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases after liver transplantation: Review and expert opinion statement

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) constitute the fourth most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) across the world. In general, the outcomes after LT are acceptable; however, disease recurrence after LT is common for all AILD, which can negatively affect graft and overall survival. Several questions persist, including the risk factors associated with recurrent disease, optimal antirejection medications, strategies to reduce the risk of recurrence, and how to best incorporate these strategies into clinical practice. For that reason, we assembled an international group of experts to review evidence to address these outstanding questions regarding LT for AILD. Survival rates after LT are ~90% and 70% at 1 and 5 years, and recurrent disease occurs in 10%-50% of patients with AILD. In patients with disease recurrence, graft survival decreased by 18% and 28% and overall survival by 8% and 12% at 5 and 10 years after LT, respectively. Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis is associated with high aminotransferases and immunoglobulin G (IgG) before LT, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the explants, and may be associated with the absence of steroids after LT. However, the efficiency and safety of triple immunosuppressive maintenance therapy is still debatable. Younger age at diagnosis with primary biliary cholangitis or LT is associated with primary biliary cholangitis recurrence. Preventive use of ursodeoxycholic acid reduces the risk of recurrence and has a benefit in graft and patient survival. Episodes of systemic inflammation, including T-cell-mediated rejection, active ulcerative colitis, and episodes of cholangitis, are associated with recurrent PSC. Recurrent disease for AILD is associated with worse graft and patient survival. Patients with autoimmune hepatitis could be considered for long-term low-dose predniso(lo)ne, whereas patients with primary biliary cholangitis should be placed on preventive ursodeoxycholic acid after LT. There are no specific treatments for PSC recurrence; however, adequate control of inflammatory bowel disease and optimal immunosuppression to avoid T-cell-mediated rejection should be encouraged.

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of Sjögren's syndrome-associated autoimmune liver disease: a real-world, 10-year retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical and laboratory features of Sjögren's syndrome-associated autoimmune liver disease (SS-ALD) patients and identify potential risk and prognostic factors.

METHODS

SS patients with or without ALD, who visited Tongji Hospital between the years 2011 and 2021 and met the 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome, were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical and laboratory data of the enrolled patients, including autoimmune antibodies, were collected and analyzed with principal component analysis, correlation analysis, LASSO regression, and Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 117 SS-ALD patients were confirmed out of 568 SS patients. Compared to SS-non-ALD patients (n = 451), SS-ALD patients exhibited more severe involvement of the hepatic and hematologic systems, albeit with less pronounced typical SS symptoms. Disease activity was higher in SS-ALD patients, as indicated by elevated ESR, CRP, and IL-6 levels, particularly in the SS-overlap subgroup. Furthermore, SS-AIH patients without AIH-specific autoantibody testing or with negative testing results had higher AST and ALT levels than those who were autoantibody-positive. Our predictive model, incorporating IgG, IgM, AST, GGT, ALT, and C4, effectively identified ALD complications in SS patients, achieving an AUC of 0.924. Additionally, a grimmer prognosis was associated with higher baseline AST and ALT levels.

CONCLUSIONS

SS-ALD patients often manifest with an insidious onset and atypical SS symptoms, yet frequently exhibit severe systemic involvement, intense inflammatory and immune responses, and a poor prognosis. To improve the clinical outcomes in SS-ALD patients, regular monitoring, early identification, and active treatment should be applied. Key Points • The study provided a detailed profile of clinical and laboratory features of SS-ALD and SS-non-ALD patients, contributing to a predictive model of ALD complications in SS patients • SS-ALD patients manifested with an insidious onset but exhibited severe systemic involvement, robust inflammatory and immune responses, and poor prognosis • SS-AIH patients without available testing for AIH-specific autoantibodies or with negative results demonstrated worse liver function, thus routine screening for autoimmune liver antibodies is recommended in SS patients • More severe baseline liver function status was associated with poorer therapeutic responses to routine medications, so early detection and timely intervention are essential for SS patients.

Liver diseases: epidemiology, causes, trends and predictions

As a highly complex organ with digestive, endocrine, and immune-regulatory functions, the liver is pivotal in maintaining physiological homeostasis through its roles in metabolism, detoxification, and immune response. Various factors including viruses, alcohol, metabolites, toxins, and other pathogenic agents can compromise liver function, leading to acute or chronic injury that may progress to end-stage liver diseases. While sharing common features, liver diseases exhibit distinct pathophysiological, clinical, and therapeutic profiles. Currently, liver diseases contribute to approximately 2 million deaths globally each year, imposing significant economic and social burdens worldwide. However, there is no cure for many kinds of liver diseases, partly due to a lack of thorough understanding of the development of these liver diseases. Therefore, this review provides a comprehensive examination of the epidemiology and characteristics of liver diseases, covering a spectrum from acute and chronic conditions to end-stage manifestations. We also highlight the multifaceted mechanisms underlying the initiation and progression of liver diseases, spanning molecular and cellular levels to organ networks. Additionally, this review offers updates on innovative diagnostic techniques, current treatments, and potential therapeutic targets presently under clinical evaluation. Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of liver diseases hold critical implications and translational value for the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Current practice in the management of paediatric autoimmune liver disease in Europe

OBJECTIVE

Paediatric autoimmune liver disease (pAILD) is a rare condition with serious health implications. Notwithstanding treatment advancements, areas of uncertainty and knowledge gaps still exist. We here investigated the real-life approach to pAILD management in Europe.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to members of the European Rare Liver Disease Reference Network (ERN RARE-LIVER) and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Hepatology Interest Group. Information was gathered regarding clinical activity, medications used, and access to paediatric drug formulations at each site.

RESULTS

Thirty-six centres from 22 European countries responded to the survey. The majority are exclusively paediatric units (86%). Among participants, 80% follow <50 children with pAILD, of which 25%-50% are <10 years old in 44% of centres. All centres use predniso(lo)ne as first-line therapy, alone (15/36) or with azathioprine (21/36). Azathioprine and mycophenolate are the preferred second-line options in centres using first-line steroid monotherapy (11/15) or combined steroid-azathioprine (19/21), respectively. Tacrolimus is used as third-line agent in 15/36 centres. Proactive measurement of drug metabolites and target levels vary widely among centres. Paediatric predniso(lo)ne formulations are commercially available in 7/22 European countries, azathioprine in 3, mycophenolate in 14, tacrolimus in 15 and ursodeoxycholic acid in 14. When paediatric formulations are unavailable, children are treated with magisterial preparations or 'solid' formulations (crushed or intact).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of pAILD in Europe varies widely in terms of medications used and treatment monitoring. Availability of paediatric drug formulations across Europe is limited. Collaborative initiatives are needed to define evidence-based strategies for management of pAILD and to promote an equal, age-appropriate treatment for affected children.

Quo vadis autoimmune hepatitis? - Summary of the 5th international autoimmune hepatitis group research workshop 2024

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic liver disease with an increasing incidence in many countries. Chronic autoimmune responses against the liver can cause hepatic and extrahepatic symptoms, decreased quality of life and reduced liver transplant-free survival if inadequately treated. Although standard treatment with corticosteroids and thiopurines improves the life expectancy of patients with AIH, remission rates and tolerability are generally overestimated and the development of alternative first-line and salvage therapies has been disappointingly slow compared to in rheumatological diseases or inflammatory bowel disease. Other gaps include the lack of disease-specific diagnostic markers for AIH. Similarly, the new entity of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis underscores the need to re-evaluate previous diagnostic criteria. The International AIH Group (IAIHG) has initiated a series of research workshops over the last decade to promote the identification of research gaps and subsequently improve the pace of scientific progress by stimulating collaboration between expert centres. This review reports on the results of the 5th Research Workshop, held in Hannover, Germany in June 2024, and summarises the progress made since the 4th Workshop in 2022. Patient representatives from the European Reference Network (ERN) Rare Liver Youth Panel participated in the workshop. The specific objectives of this year's 5th Workshop were: (1) To further improve diagnostics. (2) Initiate clinical trials including knowledge transfer on drugs from extrahepatic immune-mediated diseases, including B cell-depleting CAR T cells. (3) Utilisation of multi-omics approaches to improve the understanding of disease pathogenesis. (4) Application of machine learning-based approaches established in oncology or transplantation medicine to improve diagnosis and outcome prediction in AIH.

Real-world evidence for factors associated with maintenance treatment practices among US adults with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While avoidance of long-term corticosteroids is a common objective in the management of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), prolonged immunosuppression is usually required to prevent disease progression. This study investigates the patient and provider factors associated with treatment patterns in US patients with AIH.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

A retrospective cohort of adults with the incident and prevalent AIH was identified from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. All patients were followed for at least 2 years, with exposures assessed during the first year and treatment patterns during the second. Patient and provider factors associated with corticosteroid-sparing monotherapy and cumulative prednisone use were identified using multivariable logistic and linear regression, respectively.The cohort was 81.2% female, 66.3% White, 11.3% Black, 11.2% Hispanic, and with a median age of 61 years. Among 2203 patients with ≥1 AIH prescription fill, 83.1% received a single regimen for >6 months of the observation year, which included 52.2% azathioprine monotherapy, 16.9% azathioprine/prednisone, and 13.3% prednisone monotherapy. Budesonide use was uncommon (2.1% combination and 1.9% monotherapy). Hispanic ethnicity (aOR: 0.56; p = 0.006), cirrhosis (aOR: 0.73; p = 0.019), osteoporosis (aOR: 0.54; p =0.001), and top quintile of provider AIH experience (aOR: 0.66; p = 0.005) were independently associated with lower use of corticosteroid-sparing monotherapy. Cumulative prednisone use was greater with diabetes (+441 mg/y; p = 0.004), osteoporosis (+749 mg/y; p < 0.001), and highly experienced providers (+556 mg/y; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term prednisone therapy remains common and unexpectedly higher among patients with comorbidities potentially aggravated by corticosteroids. The greater use of corticosteroid-based therapy with highly experienced providers may reflect more treatment-refractory disease.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children with inflammatory bowel disease: An ESPGHAN position paper from the Hepatology Committee and the IBD Porto group

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to provide an evidence-supported approach to diagnose, monitor, and treat children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

METHODS

The core group formulated seven PICO-structured clinical questions. A systematic literature search from inception to December 2022 was conducted by a medical librarian using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Core messages from the literature were phrased as position statements and then circulated to a sounding board composed of international experts in pediatric gastroenterology and hepatology, histopathology, adult gastroenterology and hepatology, radiology, and surgery. Statements reaching at least 80% agreement were considered as final. The other statements were refined and then subjected to a second online vote or rejection.

RESULTS

Regular screening for gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) is essential for detecting possible biliary disease in children with IBD. MR cholangiopancreatography is the radiological modality of choice for establishing the diagnosis of PSC. Liver biopsy is relevant in the evaluation of small duct PSC or autoimmune hepatitis. Children who do not have known IBD at the time of PSC diagnosis should undergo initial screening with fecal calprotectin for asymptomatic colitis, and then at least once yearly thereafter. Children with a cholestatic liver enzyme profile can be considered for treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and can continue if there is a meaningful reduction or normalization in GGT. Oral vancomycin may have a beneficial effect on GGT and intestinal inflammation, but judicious use is recommended due to the lack of long-term studies. Children with PSC-IBD combined with convincing features of autoimmune hepatitis may benefit from corticosteroids and antimetabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

We present state-of-the-art guidance on the diagnostic criteria, follow-up strategies, and therapeutic strategies and point out research gaps in children and adolescents with PSC-IBD.

Autoimmune hepatitis under the COVID-19 veil: an analysis of the nature of potential associations

In recent years, the novel coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to over 670 million infections and nearly 7 million deaths worldwide. The global pandemic of COVID-19 has precipitated a significant public health crisis. The prevalence of liver function abnormalities associated with SARS-CoV-2 is as high as 53% among healthy individuals or patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and shows a positive correlation with disease severity; moreover, specific adaptive immune responses can influence the trajectory and outcomes of COVID-19. For instance, SARS-CoV-2 may impact autoimmunity through mechanisms such as excessive stimulation of immune responses and molecular mimicry, particularly in genetically predisposed individuals. Currently, the overall mutational trend of SARS-CoV-2 indicates heightened infectivity and immune evasion capabilities. Consequently, vaccination remains crucial for universal protection against this disease. Nevertheless, alongside the widespread implementation of vaccination programs globally, an increasing number of cases have been documented where COVID-19 vaccination appears to trigger new-onset autoimmune hepatitis; yet definitive evidence is still pending elucidation regarding causality. In this review, we analyse the clinical-immunological characteristics, risks associated with severe disease progression, and prognosis for AIH patients infected with SARS-CoV-2; discuss the detrimental effects exerted by SARS-CoV-2 on hepatic function; summarise the mechanisms and attributes leading to new-onset AIH; as well as provide insights into how vaccination may interfere with autoimmunity processes. We continue to underscore the significance of vaccination while aiming to enhance awareness concerning potential risks associated with it-this could facilitate better management strategies for autoimmune diseases along with appropriate adjustments in vaccination protocols. Although the precise triggering mechanism linking COVID-19-related events to AIH remains unclear, existing evidence suggests that this relationship is far from coincidental.

Current Treatment Regimens and Promising Molecular Therapies for Chronic Hepatobiliary Diseases

Chronic hepatobiliary damage progressively leads to fibrosis, which may evolve into cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. The fight against the increasing incidence of liver-related morbidity and mortality is challenged by a lack of clinically validated early-stage biomarkers and the limited availability of effective anti-fibrotic therapies. Current research is focused on uncovering the pathogenetic mechanisms that drive liver fibrosis. Drugs targeting molecular pathways involved in chronic hepatobiliary diseases, such as inflammation, hepatic stellate cell activation and proliferation, and extracellular matrix production, are being developed. Etiology-specific treatments, such as those for hepatitis B and C viruses, are already in clinical use, and efforts to develop new, targeted therapies for other chronic hepatobiliary diseases are ongoing. In this review, we highlight the major molecular changes occurring in patients affected by metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, viral hepatitis (Delta virus), and autoimmune chronic liver diseases (autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis). Further, we describe how this knowledge is linked to current molecular therapies as well as ongoing preclinical and clinical research on novel targeting strategies, including nucleic acid-, mesenchymal stromal/stem cell-, and extracellular vesicle-based options. Much clinical development is obviously still missing, but the plethora of promising potential treatment strategies in chronic hepatobiliary diseases holds promise for a future reversal of the current increase in morbidity and mortality in this group of patients.

An integrated sampling strategy for therapeutic mycophenolic acid monitoring in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) is the most used anti-proliferative in lung transplantation, but its pharmacokinetic (PK) variability has precluded therapeutic drug monitoring. Both genetic and clinical factors have been implicated in MPA variability. This study aimed to integrate genetic and clinical factors with PK measurements to quantify MPA exposure.

METHODS

We performed 12-hour pharmacokinetic analysis on 60 adult lung transplant recipients maintained on MPA for immunosuppression. We genotyped a SLCO1B3 polymorphisms previously associated MPA metabolism and collected relevant clinical data. We calculated area under the curve (AUC0-12) and performed univariate linear regression analysis to evaluate its association with genetic, clinical, and pharmacokinetic variables. We performed lasso regression analysis to create final AUC estimation tools.

RESULTS

PK-only measurements obtained 2, 3, and 8 hours after MPA administration (C2, C3, and C8) were strongly associated with MPA AUC0-12 (R267%, 67% and 68% respectively). Clinical and genetic factors associated with MPA AUC0-12 included the MPA dose (p = 0.001), transplant diagnosis (p = 0.015), SLCO1B3 genotype (p = 0.049), and body surface area (p = 0.050). The best integrated single-sampling strategy included C2 and achieved an R2 value of 80%. The best integrated limited-sampling strategy included C0, C0.25, and C2 and achieved an R2 value of 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

An integrated limited sampling strategy (LSS) for MPA allows increased accuracy in prediction of MPA AUC0-12 compared to PK-only modeling. Validation of this model will allow for clinically feasible MPA therapeutic drug monitoring and help advance precision management of MPA.

Hard-to-treat autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis: The dawn of a new era of pharmacological treatment

Patients with hard-to-treat autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are defined a posteriori as those who do not show a sufficient response or are intolerant to pharmacological treatments, thus not achieving biochemical surrogate endpoints that are associated with long-term liver-related-event-free survival. The absence of a recently harmonized definition of 'complete biochemical response within 6 months (CBR≤6M)', which is defined as the normalization of serum transaminase and IgG levels below the upper limit of normal at ≤6 months after treatment initiation, is regarded as hard-to-treat AIH. The implementation of CBR≤6M, in turn, has been facilitating clinical trials, e.g., between azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, to reconsider appropriate first-line steroid sparing agents, leading to a reduction in the number of hard-to-treat AIH cases. Regarding PBC, one of the disseminated definitions of hard-to-treat patients is the absence of POISE criteria, which are evaluated at 12 months with serum alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels, after the introduction of ursodeoxycholic acid. Hard-to-treat PBC not meeting the POISE criteria has very recently been the target population for the U.S. FDA-approved second-line drugs, elafibranor and seladelpar. In future pharmacological treatment of AIH and PBC, the primary objective for AIH is likely to focus on lowering the number of hard-to-treat patients with personalized steroid sparing treatment regimens. A challenging goal in PBC treatment is the further optimization of treatment surrogate endpoints, even to the stricter alkaline phosphatase normalization, with which an indication of second- or later-line drugs might be expanded, but could ultimately lengthen patients' long-term survival.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis (Experts’ Agreement)

Background. In the last decade, the understanding of the pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has significantly deepened, based on the results of new clinical studies some diagnostic issues have been revised and immunosuppressive therapy regimens have been optimized.Materials and methods. The latest Russian clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AIH were presented in 2013; and in 2017, the first Russian agreement on the diagnosis and treatment of AIH was held. Updating approaches to the management of patients with AIH necessitated next systematization for use in clinical practice. In February 2024, the final session was held to discuss the provisions of the second agreement on the diagnosis and treatment of AIH.Results. This publication presents the main discussion points of the agreement regarding methods and algorithms for detecting autoantibodies, the role of liver biopsy, revised morphological criteria for AIH, optimized immunosuppressive therapy regimens, updated criteria for assessing the response to therapy.Conclusions. The agreement was the result of the work of a group of experts on the diagnosis and treatment of AIH and represents the basis for the creation of updated federal clinical guidelines.

Autoimmune hepatitis: Towards a personalized treatment

Autoimmune hepatitis is an uncommon condition that affects both adults and children and is characterized by chronic and recurrent inflammatory activity in the liver. This inflammation is accompanied by elevated IgG and autoantibody levels. Historically, treatment consists of steroids with the addition of azathioprine, which results in remission in approximately 80% of patients. Despite significant advancements in our understanding of the immune system over the past two decades, few modifications have been made to treatment algorithms, which have remained largely unchanged since they were first proposed more than 40 years ago. This review summarized the various treatment options currently available as well as our experiences using them. Although steroids are the standard treatment for induction therapy, other medications may be considered. Cyclosporin A, a calcineurin inhibitor that decreases T cell activation, has proven effective for induction of remission, but its long-term side effects limit its appeal for maintenance. Tacrolimus, a drug belonging to the same family, has been used in patients with refractory diseases with fewer side effects. Sirolimus and everolimus have interesting effects on regulatory T cell populations and may become viable options in the future. Mycophenolate mofetil is not effective for induction but is a valid alternative for patients who are intolerant to azathioprine. B cell-depleting drugs, such as rituximab and belimumab, have been successfully used in refractory cases and are useful in both the short and long term. Other promising treatments include anti-tumor necrosis factors, Janus kinases inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. This growing armamentarium allows us to imagine a more tailored approach to the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis in the near future.

Optimizing thiopurine therapy in autoimmune hepatitis: A multicenter study on monitoring metabolite profiles and co-therapy with allopurinol

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In autoimmune hepatitis, achieving complete biochemical remission (CBR) with current weight-based thiopurine dosing is challenging. We investigated whether patients could be stratified regarding CBR according to a target range of thiopurine metabolites. Moreover, we explored the effects of azathioprine dosage increases and co-therapy of allopurinol with low-dose thiopurines on metabolite profiles and treatment response.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

The relation between metabolites and treatment response was assessed in 337 individuals from 4 European centers. In a global, cross-sectional analysis, active metabolites 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGN) were similar in those with and without CBR. However, analyzing patients with sequential measurements over 4 years (N = 146) revealed higher average 6TGN levels in those with stable CBR (260 pmol/0.2 mL) compared to those failing to maintain CBR (181 pmol/0.2 mL; p = 0.0014) or never achieving CBR (153 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001), with an optimal 6TGN cutoff of ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL (sensitivity: 76% and specificity: 78%). Only 42% exhibited 6TGN ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL following weight-based dosing, as doses weakly correlated with 6TGN but with 6-methylmercaptopurine (6MMP), a metabolite associated with toxicity. Azathioprine dose increases led to preferential 6MMP formation (+127% vs. 6TGN +34%; p < 0.0001). Conversely, adding allopurinol to thiopurines in difficult-to-treat patients (N = 36) raised 6TGN (168→321 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001) and lowered 6MMP (2125→184 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001), resulting in improved transaminases in all patients and long-term CBR in 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining CBR in autoimmune hepatitis was associated with 6TGN ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL. For patients who fail to achieve CBR and therapeutic 6TGN levels despite thiopurine dose increase due to preferential 6MMP formation, comedication of allopurinol alongside low-dose thiopurines represents an efficient alternative.

Advances in the Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory liver disease caused by autoimmune reactions, with an unknown etiology. If left untreated, it can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, or even death. While most patients respond well to first-line treatments, a significant number experience poor responses or intolerance, requiring the use of second- or third-line therapies. Ongoing research into the pathogenesis of AIH is leading to the development of novel therapeutic approaches. This review summarized recent advancements in the treatment of AIH both domestically and internationally.

Unmet needs in autoimmune hepatitis: Results of the prospective multicentre European Reference Network Registry (R-LIVER)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER) launched the prospective, multicentre, quality-controlled R-LIVER registry on rare liver diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the presentation and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) after 1 year of treatment.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected at the time of diagnosis and after 6 and 12 months follow-up. Complete biochemical response (CBR) was defined as normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) serum levels.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients from six European centres were included in the analysis. After 6 months of treatment 50% (106/212), and after 12 months 63% (131/210) of patients reached CBR with only 27% (56/211) achieving a steroid-free CBR within the first year. Overall, 16 different treatment regimens were administered. Change of treatment, mostly due to intolerance, occurred in 30.4% within the first 6 months. In multivariate analysis, younger age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.05]; p = .007), severe fibrosis (OR .38 [95% .16-.89], p = .026) and change of treatment within the first 6 months (OR .40 [95% CI .2-.86]; p = .018) were associated with a lesser chance of ALT normalization at 12 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The landscape of AIH treatment in Europe is highly heterogeneous, even between expert centres. The results from this first European multicentre prospective registry reveal several unmet needs, highlighted by the overall low rates of CBR and the frequent failure to withdraw corticosteroids.

External validation of the IAIHG autoimmune hepatitis response criteria in a multicentric real-world cohort

Background & Aims

The goal of treatment in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is induction of remission to prevent the development of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and its related complications. Various definitions of treatment response and remission have been used. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) recently defined consensus criteria for treatment response. We aimed to validate the IAIHG response criteria in our cohort and establish correlations with survival endpoints.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, multicentric cohort study in one tertiary and seven secondary care centres in Belgium. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age at data collection and were diagnosed with AIH by a simplified IAIHG score of ≥6. Complete biochemical response (CBR) was defined according to the IAIHG consensus criteria as normalisation of transaminases and serum IgG within the first 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was liver-related survival - defined as freedom from liver-related death or liver transplantation. Secondary endpoints were overall mortality and transplant-free survival. Outcomes were compared between patients attaining CBR and those with insufficient response.

Results

Biochemical response status could be determined in 200 patients with AIH: CBR was achieved in 128 (64.0%) individuals. Patients not achieving CBR more frequently presented with cirrhosis on initial histology (22.2% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.036). Liver-related mortality or liver transplantation as a primary outcome occurred in 26 patients (13.0%). Patients achieving CBR exhibited superior liver-related (hazard ratio 0.118; 95% CI 0.052-0.267; p <0.0001) and overall (hazard ratio 0.253; 95% CI 0.111-0.572; p = 0.0003) survival.

Conclusions

We externally validated the IAIHG consensus criteria for CBR and confirmed their correlation with survival endpoints in a multicentric, real-world cohort. Patients with AIH achieving CBR as an intermediate endpoint have significantly superior liver-related and overall survival.

Impacts and Implications

Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of treatment to induce remission of disease activity in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and the majority of patients require long-term corticosteroid treatment to achieve sustained remission. Definitions of response to treatment have varied over the years, and consistently used intermediate endpoints are needed to facilitate advancements in non-corticosteroid treatment for autoimmune hepatitis. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) defined consensus criteria on endpoints in the treatment of AIH, for which further external validation is needed. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of the IAIHG consensus criteria and corroborate their correlation to primary endpoints, such as liver-related survival and native liver survival in a multicentric, real-world setting. The design of future studies can rely on the IAIHG consensus criteria as intermediate endpoints.

Diagnostic criteria and long-term outcomes in AIH-PBC variant syndrome under combination therapy

Background & Aims

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) can co-exist in AIH-PBC, requiring combined treatment with immunosuppression and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). The Paris criteria are commonly used to identify these patients; however, the optimal diagnostic criteria are unknown. We aimed to evaluate the use and clinical relevance of both Paris and Zhang criteria.

Methods

Eighty-three patients with a clinical suspicion of AIH-PBC who were treated with combination therapy were included. Histology was re-evaluated. Characteristics and long-term outcomes were retrospectively compared to patients with AIH and PBC.

Results

Seventeen (24%) patients treated with combination therapy fulfilled the Paris criteria. Fifty-two patients (70%) fulfilled the Zhang criteria. Patients who met Paris and Zhang criteria more often had inflammation and fibrosis on histology compared to patients only meeting the Zhang criteria. Ten-year liver transplant (LT)-free survival was 87.3% (95% CI 78.9-95.7%) in patients with AIH-PBC. This did not differ in patients in or outside the Paris or Zhang criteria (p = 0.46 and p = 0.40, respectively) or from AIH (p = 0.086). LT-free survival was significantly lower in patients with PBC and severe hepatic inflammation - not receiving immunosuppression - compared to those with AIH-PBC (65%; 95% CI 52.2-77.8% vs. 87%; 95% CI 83.2-90.8%; hazard ratio 0.52; p = 0.043).

Conclusions

In this study, patients with AIH-PBC outside Paris or Zhang criteria were frequently labeled as having AIH-PBC and were successfully treated with combination therapy with similar outcomes. LT-free survival was worse in patients with PBC and hepatic inflammation than in those treated as having AIH-PBC. More patients may benefit from combination therapy.

Impact and implications

This study demonstrated that patients with AIH-PBC variant syndrome treated with combined therapy consisting of immunosuppressants and ursodeoxycholic acid often do not fulfill the Paris criteria. They do however have comparable response to therapy and long-term outcomes as patients who do fulfill the diagnostic criteria. Additionally, patients with PBC and additional signs of hepatic inflammation have poorer long-term outcomes compared to patients treated as having AIH-PBC. These results implicate that a larger group of patients with features of both AIH and PBC may benefit from combined treatment. With our results, we call for improved consensus among experts in the field on the diagnosis and management of AIH-PBC variant syndrome.