Non-invasive imaging criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis B

LI-RADS for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Noncirrhotic Chronic Hepatitis C

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria have not been validated for patients with noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis C (CHC), who are at a greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than the general population. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5, indicating definite HCC) observations for HCC using CT and MRI in patients with noncirrhotic CHC and to compare these findings with those in patients with cirrhotic CHC. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients without cirrhosis with CHC with focal hepatic nodules of 1 cm or greater on dynamic CT or MRI scans who underwent pathologic confirmation at two university hospitals from August 2002 to February 2022. This group served as the test dataset. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC using CT and MRI. When LI-RADS categorization differed between CT and MRI, the MRI-based classification was used as the definitive category. Results were validated using a dataset of patients with CHC from two additional hospitals based on the clinical composite reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Results The test dataset comprised 458 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 9 [SD]; 350 male; 219 without cirrhosis, 239 with cirrhosis). For noncirrhotic livers, the LR-5 criteria achieved an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.93), 85.1% (95% CI: 80.6, 89.7), 82.4% (95% CI: 77.0, 87.8), 97.6% (95% CI: 93.0, 100.0), 99.4% (95% CI: 98.2, 100.0), and 54.7% (95% CI: 43.4, 65.9), respectively. The AUC for LR-5 observations in diagnosing HCC was higher in the noncirrhotic liver group compared with the cirrhotic liver group (AUC, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86, 0.93] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84]; P = .002). The diagnostic performance of the LR-5 criteria for diagnosing HCC was also excellent in patients with noncirrhotic CHC in the validation dataset, which included 155 lesions from 103 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 12; 146 male). The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in the validation dataset were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.97), 96.1% (95% CI: 93.1, 99.2), 82.9% (95% CI: 70.4, 95.3), 100%, 100%, and 95.2% (95% CI: 91.5, 99.0), respectively. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC in patients with noncirrhotic CHC was comparable to that in patients with cirrhosis across various clinical settings. © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Schöllnast in this issue.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

Do Risk Factors for HCC Impact the Association of CT/MRI LIRADS Major Features With HCC? An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

Background: Guidelines suggest the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) may not be applicable for some populations at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, data assessing the association of HCC risk factors with LI-RADS major features are lacking. Purpose: To evaluate whether the association between HCC risk factors and each CT/MRI LI-RADS major feature differs among individuals at-risk for HCC. Methods: Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were searched from 2014 to 2022. Individual participant data (IPD) were extracted from studies evaluating HCC diagnosis using CT/MRI LI-RADS and reporting HCC risk factors. IPD from studies were pooled and modelled with one-stage meta-regressions. Interactions were assessed between major features and HCC risk factors, including age, sex, cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), and study location. A mixed effects model that included the major features, as well as separate models that included interactions between each risk factor and each major feature, were fit. Differences in interactions across levels of each risk factor were calculated using adjusted odds-ratios (ORs), 95% confidence-intervals (CI), and z-tests. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. (Protocol: https://osf.io/tdv7j/). Results: Across 23 studies (2958 patients and 3553 observations), the associations between LI-RADS major features and HCC were consistent across several HCC risk factors (P-value range: .09-.99). A sensitivity analysis among the 4 studies with a low risk of bias did not differ from the primary analysis. Conclusion: The association between CT/MRI LI-RADS major features and HCC risk factors do not significantly differ in individuals at-risk for HCC. These findings suggest that CT/MR LI-RADS should be applied to all patients considered at risk by LI-RADS without modification or exclusions, regardless of the presence or absence of the risk factors evaluated in this study.

Prognostic value of preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index/albumin for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing curative resection

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major factor for cancer-associated mortality globally. Although the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and albumin (ALB) show individual prognostic value for various cancers, their combined significance (SII/ALB) in HCC patients undergoing curative hepatectomy is still unknown. It is hypothesized that a higher SII/ALB ratio correlates with poorer outcomes with regard to overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

AIM

To investigate the effect of preoperative SII/ALB in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

Patients who received curative surgery for HCC at a single institution between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to estimate OS and RFS. A nomogram was created using prognostic factors determined by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and analyzed using multivariate Cox regression. This nomogram was assessed internally through the calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA) and the concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

This study enrolled 1653 HCC patients. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that SII/ALB independently predicted OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.03-1.46, P = 0.025] and RFS (HR = 1.19, 95%CI: 1.03-1.38, P = 0.022). Age, alpha-fetoprotein, hepatitis B surface antigen, albumin-bilirubin grade, tumor diameter, portal vein tumor thrombus, tumor number, and SII/ALB were incorporated into the nomogram to predict OS. The nomogram had a C-index of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.71-0.76) and 0.71 (95%CI: 0.67-0.74) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The area under the ROC curve, DCA and calibration curves demonstrated high accuracy and clinical benefits.

CONCLUSION

The SII/ALB may independently predict outcomes in HCC patients who receive curative surgical treatment. In addition, the nomogram can be used in HCC treatment decision-making.

New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to modify LI-RADS version 2018 to improve sensitivity and determine the value of the combination of high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels for small HCC (sHCC, ≤ 30 mm) diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 984 patients at high risk for HCC, with 1204 observations (including 997 small observations ≤ 30 mm), who underwent extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI were enrolled from five independent centers. Blinded readers evaluated the LI-RADS features and categorized each observation according to the LI-RADS v2018, modified LI-RADS and EASL. Odds ratios of LI-RADS major features (MFs) and several high AFP levels for sHCC diagnosis were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The modified LR-5 criteria was developed by including no APHE at any size with two MFs, and non-rim APHE with one MF (≥ 10 mm) or with two MFs (< 10 mm). The diagnostic performance of each version of the LR-5 was compared using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

APHE, washout, enhancing capsule and five high AFP levels were independently associated with sHCC. In three datasets, the modified LI-RADS had higher sensitivities for sHCC (76.8 ∼ 85.5 % vs. 73.7 ∼ 75.9 %, P < 0.05) to the LR-5 v2018. The modified LI-RADS with AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL as an additional feature or as an alternative to threshold growth provided higher sensitivities for sHCC than LI-RADS v2018 (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 73.7 ∼ 75.9 %, all P < 0.05), modified LI-RADS (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 76.8 ∼ 85.5 %, all P < 0.05) and EASL version 2018 (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 73.3 ∼ 74.7 %, all P < 0.05), with comparable specificities (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The new strategy of LI-RADS v2018 provides significantly higher sensitivity and comparable specificity than those of LI-RADS v2018 for sHCC diagnosis on ECA-MRI.

Exploring transparent reporting and data availability in systematic reviews to identify subgroup evidence: imaging for suspected hepatocellular carcinoma in the non-cirrhotic liver

We aim to illustrate the role of complete and transparent reporting coupled with access to data sourced from published systematic reviews, especially assisting in the identification of evidence for subgroups within the context of a rare disease. To accomplish this principle, we provide a real-world example encountered during the revision of the Dutch clinical practice guideline for hepatocellular carcinoma. Specifically, we retrieved insights from two Cochrane reviews to identify direct evidence concerning the diagnostic test accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for detecting hepatocellular carcinomas in suspected patients without liver cirrhosis. Through reusing the Cochrane review authors' efforts already undertaken in their exhaustive literature search and selection, we successfully identified relevant direct evidence for this subgroup of suspected patients without cirrhosis and performed an evidence synthesis within the constraints of limited resources for the guideline revision. This approach holds the potential for replication in other subgroups in the context of rare diseases, contingent on the transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews, as well as the availability and accessibility of their extracted data. Consequently, we underscore the importance of adhering to established reporting guidelines for systematic reviews, while simultaneously advocating for increased availability and accessibility to data. Such practices would not only increase the transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews but could also increase reusability of their data. In turn, the increased reusability could result in reduced resource utilization in other sectors such as the guideline developing community as we show in our example.

[Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for characterisation of focal liver lesions]

Due to the trend towards increased use of imaging and rising awareness among high-risk patients, gastroenterologists and hepatologists are more frequently confronted with patients with focal liver lesions. In the differentiation of these lesions, CT and MRI have increasingly found their way into primary diagnostic steps in everyday clinical practice. Contrast-enhanced sonography, on the other hand, is a very effective and cost-efficient method for assessing focal liver lesions. The success of the method is not only based on the visualisation of microvascularisation in real time. If sonography is performed by the treating physician, he can use the exact knowledge of history and clinical findings to specifically adapt the examination procedure and to interpret the sonographic findings with greater accuracy ("clinical sonography"). At the same time, the method enables the practitioner to combine diagnostics and management decisions in his or her own hands. To achieve excellent results with contrast-enhanced sonography-as with any other imaging method-it is necessary that the examiner is sufficiently qualified.This article systematically presents the sonographic characteristics of the most common liver lesions and clearly shows their contrast patterns using videos (available via QR code). The article illustrates that CEUS could-and from the authors' point of view, should-have an even greater significance in the future.

Multiparametric MRI for characterization of the tumour microenvironment

Our understanding of tumour biology has evolved over the past decades and cancer is now viewed as a complex ecosystem with interactions between various cellular and non-cellular components within the tumour microenvironment (TME) at multiple scales. However, morphological imaging remains the mainstay of tumour staging and assessment of response to therapy, and the characterization of the TME with non-invasive imaging has not yet entered routine clinical practice. By combining multiple MRI sequences, each providing different but complementary information about the TME, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) enables non-invasive assessment of molecular and cellular features within the TME, including their spatial and temporal heterogeneity. With an increasing number of advanced MRI techniques bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical applications, mpMRI could ultimately guide the selection of treatment approaches, precisely tailored to each individual patient, tumour and therapeutic modality. In this Review, we describe the evolving role of mpMRI in the non-invasive characterization of the TME, outline its applications for cancer detection, staging and assessment of response to therapy, and discuss considerations and challenges for its use in future medical applications, including personalized integrated diagnostics.

Progression of chronic liver disease to hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for surveillance and management

BACKGROUND

Current opinion holds that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arises as a stepwise progression from chronic liver disease (CLD) to cirrhosis and then to HCC. However, some HCCs may develop in a non-cirrhotic liver, raising uncertainty about their origin.

METHODS

We analysed a prospectively accrued cohort of 2592 CLD patients (median follow-up = 13 years) with no prior evidence of liver cirrhosis. To track the progression of liver fibrosis prior to HCC diagnosis, we examined serial measurements of Fib-4 (an index of liver fibrosis). We also evaluated fibrosis progression in response to antiviral treatment in patients with hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV). Recognising the limitations of serologic fibrosis assessment, we correlated Fib-4 and fibrosis histology within this cohort.

RESULTS

Among HCC patients, 28% had no indication of cirrhosis prior to HCC diagnosis. Only 31% of HBV-related HCC cases followed the cirrhotic pathway. HCV patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) developed cirrhosis approximately 7 years before HCC diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis challenges the notion of cirrhosis as an obligatory stage of HCC development in CLD patients. We affirm HBV's direct oncogenic potential and find that achieving SVR does not universally prevent HCC development. Our findings have major implications for HCC surveillance.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We performed an updated meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) 5 category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018), and to evaluate differences by imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 using v2018 for diagnosing HCC. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies qualified for the meta-analysis, comprising 9031 patients, 10,547 observations, and 7216 HCCs. The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC were 66% (95% CI, 61-70%) and 91% (95% CI, 89-93%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, MRI with extracellular agent (ECA-MRI) showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (77% [95% CI, 70-82%]) than CT (66% [95% CI, 58-73%]; p = 0.023) or MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI) (65% [95% CI, 60-70%]; p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ECA-MRI and MRI with gadobenate (gadobenate-MRI) (73% [95% CI, 61-82%]; p = 0.495). Pooled specificities were 88% (95% CI, 80-93%) for CT, 92% (95% CI, 86-95%) for ECA-MRI, 93% (95% CI, 91-95%) for Gx-MRI, and 91% (95% CI, 84-95%) for gadobenate-MRI without significant differences (p = 0.084-0.803).

CONCLUSIONS

LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material, while ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT or Gx-MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Refinement of the criteria for improving sensitivity while maintaining high specificity of LR-5 for HCC diagnosis may be an essential future direction.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC using LI-RADSv2018 were 66% and 91%, respectively. • ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT (77% vs 66%, p = 0.023) or Gx-MRI (77% vs 65%, p = 0.001). • LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity (88-93%) for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material type.

Prognostic Factors for Mortality in Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Diagnosis: Development of a Predictive Model Using Artificial Intelligence

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75% of primary liver tumors. Controlling risk factors associated with its development and implementing screenings in risk populations does not seem sufficient to improve the prognosis of these patients at diagnosis. The development of a predictive prognostic model for mortality at the diagnosis of HCC is proposed.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, the analysis of data from 191 HCC patients was conducted using machine learning (ML) techniques to analyze the prognostic factors of mortality that are significant at the time of diagnosis. Clinical and analytical data of interest in patients with HCC were gathered.

RESULTS

Meeting Milan criteria, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification and albumin levels were the variables with the greatest impact on the prognosis of HCC patients. The ML algorithm that achieved the best results was random forest (RF).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of a predictive prognostic model at the diagnosis is a valuable tool for patients with HCC and for application in clinical practice. RF is useful and reliable in the analysis of prognostic factors in the diagnosis of HCC. The search for new prognostic factors is still necessary in patients with HCC.

Adherence to LI-RADS and EASL high-risk population criteria: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) diagnostic criteria for noninvasive diagnosis of HCC can only be applied to patients at a high risk of HCC. This systematic review assesses adherence to the LI-RADS and EASL high-risk population criteria in published studies.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

PubMed was searched for original research, published between January 2012 and December 2021, reporting LI-RADS and EASL diagnostic criteria on contrast-enhanced ultrasound, CT, or MRI. The algorithm version, publication year, risk status, and etiologies of chronic liver disease were recorded for each study. Adherence to high-risk population criteria was evaluated as optimal (unequivocal adherence), suboptimal (equivocal), or inadequate (clear violation). A total of 219 original studies were included, with 215 that used the LI-RADS criteria, 4 EASL only, and 15 that evaluated both LI-RADS and EASL criteria. Optimal, suboptimal, or inadequate adherence to high-risk population criteria was observed in 111/215 (51.6%), 86/215 (40.0%), and 18/215 (8.4%) LI-RADS and 6/19 (31.6%), 5/19 (26.3%), and 8/19 (42.1%) EASL studies ( p < 0.001) regardless of the imaging modality. Adherence to high-risk population criteria significantly improved according to the CT/MRI LI-RADS versions (optimal in v2018 in 64.5% of studies; v2017, 45.8%; v2014, 24.4%; v2013.1, 33.3%; p < 0.001) and the publication year (2020-2021, 62.5%; 2018-2019, 33.9%; 2014-2017, 39.3% of all LI-RADS studies; p = 0.002). No significant differences in adherence to high-risk population criteria were observed in the versions of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS ( p = 0.388) or EASL ( p = 0.293).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to high-risk population criteria was optimal or suboptimal in about 90% and 60% of LI-RADS and EASL studies, respectively.

Synergistic Nanomedicine: Photodynamic, Photothermal and Photoimmune Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Fulfilling the Myth of Prometheus?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, with high morbidity and mortality, which seriously threatens the health and life expectancy of patients. The traditional methods of treatment by surgical ablation, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and more recently immunotherapy have not given the expected results in HCC. New integrative combined therapies, such as photothermal, photodynamic, photoimmune therapy (PTT, PDT, PIT), and smart multifunctional platforms loaded with nanodrugs were studied in this review as viable solutions in the synergistic nanomedicine of the future. The main aim was to reveal the latest findings and open additional avenues for accelerating the adoption of innovative approaches for the multi-target management of HCC. High-tech experimental medical applications in the molecular and cellular research of photosensitizers, novel light and laser energy delivery systems and the features of photomedicine integration via PDT, PTT and PIT in immuno-oncology, from bench to bedside, were introspected. Near-infrared PIT as a treatment of HCC has been developed over the past decade based on novel targeted molecules to selectively suppress cancer cells, overcome immune blocking barriers, initiate a cascade of helpful immune responses, and generate distant autoimmune responses that inhibit metastasis and recurrences, through high-tech and intelligent real-time monitoring. The process of putting into effect new targeted molecules and the intelligent, multifunctional solutions for therapy will bring patients new hope for a longer life or even a cure, and the fulfillment of the myth of Prometheus.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.