Radial head fractures--an update

Clinical and functional outcomes of plate and screw osteosynthesis in mason type III and IV radial head fractures in the absence of a radial head prosthesis

INTRODUCTION

Radial head and neck fractures represent a significant portion of elbow fractures in adults, particularly affecting younger patients due to falls onto outstretched hands. Surgical treatment is often necessary for displaced and comminuted fractures, especially those with associated ligamentous injuries. This study evaluates the long-term clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of patients with Mason type III and IV radial head fractures managed through open reduction and internal fixation using plate and screw osteosynthesis, due to the unavailability of radial head prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients with Mason type III or IV radial head fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) between 2020 and 2024. Clinical assessments included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) Score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) score, as well as measurements of elbow flexion, extension, supination, and pronation. Radiographic evaluations assessed fracture union, loss of reduction, implant breakage or loosening, avascular necrosis, radiographic arthritis, and heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 29.1 ± 20.1 months in 28 patients (16 M/12F; mean age 48.5 ± 12.6 years), mean elbow flexion was 120.4 ± 14.7, extension loss 10 ± 5.9, supination 68.9 ± 8.8°, and pronation 62.8 ± 7.1°, with mean VAS 2.3 ± 1.1, MEP Score 83.0 ± 8.9, and Quick-DASH 12.8 ± 7.6. Complete fracture union was achieved in 25 cases, partial union in 2, and asymptomatic nonunion in 1. Complications occurred in three patients (10%), including implant loosening, loss of reduction, heterotopic ossification, and avascular necrosis; two patients showed post-traumatic degenerative changes. One patient required K-wire removal due to migration and another underwent revision fixation with iliac crest bone graft for screw loosening/nonunion. No cases needed open arthrolysis or secondary radial head resection.

CONCLUSION

While osteosynthesis is effective in managing Mason type III and IV radial head fractures, having a radial head prosthesis available in the operating room can provide flexibility, especially in comminuted fractures, and potentially reduce the need for revision surgeries. These findings underscore the importance of adaptable surgical planning to improve outcomes in complex radial head fractures.

Minimum 10-year follow-up after open reduction and internal fixation of radial head fractures Mason type II and III

BACKGROUND

The treatment of complex radial head fractures remains controversial with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty, and radial head excision being the most common treatment options. While ORIF is the preferred treatment strategy for Mason type II fractures, the optimal treatment of Mason type III fractures is debated. The purpose of this study was to report minimum 10-year outcomes after ORIF of Mason type II and type III radial head fractures. We hypothesized that both Mason Type II and Type III fracture patients would demonstrate satisfactory clinical outcomes at minimum 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

All patients with Mason type II or III radial head fractures who were treated with ORIF by a single surgeon between 2005 and 2010 were included. Fractures with significant bone defects were treated with bone grafts and elbow ligament injuries were treated with either primary ligament repair or reconstruction. Patient reported outcome questionnaires were administered at the time of last clinical follow-up and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients, including 13 male and 11 female patients with an average age of 39 (range 19-60) at the time of surgery met inclusion criteria. Thirteen patients suffered from Mason type II and 11 patients from Mason type III fractures. At initial follow-up, 21 out of 24 fractures (88%) demonstrated radiographic union. Three nonunions, 2 of which were Mason type III fractures, were treated with revision ORIF and iliac crest bone grafting. 11 patients developed postoperative elbow stiffness and required capsular release surgery. At last clinical follow-up, average flexion was 139°, average extension was 4°, average supination was 77°, and average pronation was 81°. The median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 7 (ranging from 0 to 32). Minimum 10-year follow-up (mean: 14.6 years) was collected on 18 of 24 (75%) of the patients. At a minimum of 10 years postoperatively, the median QuickDASH score was 4.5 (range: 0 to 25) and the median SANE score was 96.5 (range: 75-100). Median satisfaction with the surgical outcome was 10 of 10 (range: 3-10).

CONCLUSION

ORIF of Mason type II and III radial head fractures results in high union rates with good functional outcomes at a mean of 14.6 years postoperatively. The study results suggest that ORIF of Mason type II and III radial head fractures leads to long-term positive functional outcomes.

Comparison of operatively and nonoperatively treated isolated mason type II radial head fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Radial head fractures are the most common bony injury of the elbow in adults. The current literature does not agree on whether isolated stable type II radial head fractures should be treated operatively or nonoperatively. This review aims to determine the preferred treatment for Mason type II radial head fractures and compare the outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment.

METHODS

Our study used PRISMA guidelines and conducted a thorough search of multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases, initially identifying 545 relevant publications on surgical and conservative treatment of Mason type II radial head fractures. The final search date for this study is July 7, 2024.Through a comprehensive meta-analysis, we evaluated several outcomes, including functional scores (DASH, OES, and MEPS scores), clinical outcomes (elbow flexion, elbow extension deficit, elbow pronation, and elbow supination), and complication rate (total complications and elbow pain). The mean difference (MD) was compared for continuous outcomes, and the odds ratios (ORs) were compared for categorical outcomes.

RESULT

A total of 271 patients from 4 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 142 patients received surgical treatment and 129 patients received non-surgical treatment. The study found no statistically significant differences between surgical and non-surgical treatments in DASH, OES, MEPS, elbow flexion, elbow extension impairment, and elbow pain. Compared with surgical treatment, non-surgical treatment was associated with greater elbow pronation (OR = -3.10, 95% CI = [-4.96, -1.25], P = 0.55, I2 = 0%) and a lower complication rate (OR = 5.54, 95% CI = [1.79, 17.14], P = 0.42, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current evidence, conservative management of isolated Mason II radial head fractures yields favorable therapeutic outcomes with a low incidence of complications.

Added transverse screw in tripod construct increases stiffness in Mason III radial head fractures: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The tripod screw configuration has been shown to offer similar stiffness characteristics to a laterally placed plate. However, concern has been raised that the construct may be prone to failure in scenarios where the screw intersects at the fracture line. We performed a finite element analysis to assess potentially ideal and unideal screw placements in the tripod construct among Mason III radial head fractures.

METHODS

A 3-dimensional proximal radius model was developed using a computed tomography scan of an adult male radius. The fracture site was simulated with a uniform gap in transverse and sagittal planes creating a Mason type III fracture pattern comprising 3 fragments. Three configurations were modeled with varying screw intersection points in relation to the radial neck fracture line. A fourth configuration comprising an added transverse interfragmentary screw was also modeled. Loading scenarios included axial and shear forces to simulate physiological conditions. Von Mises stress and displacement were used as outcomes for analysis.

RESULTS

Some variation can be seen among the tripod configurations, with a marginal tendency for reduced implant stress and greater stiffness when screw intersection is further from the neck fracture region. The construct with an added transverse interfragmentary screw demonstrated greater stiffness (2269 N/mm) than an equivalent tripod construct comprising 3 screws (612 N/mm).

CONCLUSION

The results from this study demonstrate biomechanical similarity between tripod screw constructs including where screws intersect at the radial neck fracture line. An added fourth screw, positioned transversely across fragments, increased construct stiffness in our model.

A Study Evaluating the Functional Outcomes of Mason Type III and IV Radial Head Fractures Treated With a Radial Head Prosthesis

Objective This research aimed to assess the functional result of type III and IV radial head fractures that were treated using a radial head prosthesis. Methods A retrospective investigation was conducted on 70 patients with type III and IV radial head and neck fractures, as classified by Mason. The patients were hospitalized and received treatment at the Orthopaedics Department, where they had radial head prosthesis surgery for three years. Results Among the total of 70 cases, 42 (60%) cases were below the age of 40, while 28 (47%) cases were over 40 years. The average age was 36.4 years. The maximum age recorded was 54 years, while the lowest age recorded was 30 years. The female population outnumbered the male population. The majority of instances (42, 60%) were attributed to falls, while the remaining cases were caused by road traffic accidents (RTAs). Out of the total 70 instances, 52 cases (74.28%) exhibited right-side dominance, whereas 18 cases (25.72%) exhibited left-side dominance. Within our case study group, 56 (80%) cases fell under modified Mason's classification type Ill, totaling 56 instances. The remaining 20% of the cases, amounting to 11 cases, were classified as modified Mason's classification type IV. Among the 70 patients, 55 cases (78.58%) did not have any ligamentous damage, whereas seven (10%) cases had lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) injury and eight (11%) cases had medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury. The P value for flexion, extension, pronation, and supination was shown to be very significant. Out of the total, 47 (67%) instances had an MEPI score (Mayo Elbow Performance Index) of more than 90, indicating exceptional performance. In addition, 16 cases (22.85%) had an MEPI score ranging from 75 to 89, which is considered a good result. Lastly, seven cases (10%) had an MEPI score ranging from 60 to 74, indicating a fair result. Conclusion The use of a radial head prosthesis is considered a viable option for managing severe and irreparable fractures of the radial head. Effective outcomes hinge on meticulous preoperative planning, skilled intraoperative techniques, and intensive postoperative rehabilitation. These elements collectively contribute to achieving consistent and favorable results in patients undergoing this surgical intervention.

Early range of motion results in good elbow function following conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the range of motion (ROM), elbow function and predictors for good elbow function after conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients with non-displaced radial head fractures (displacement < 2 mm), that were diagnosed between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2021 in a level I trauma center, were included in this retrospective case series and the charts were evaluated for ROM and elbow function. Elbow function was categorized as "good" or "bad" depending on the ROM measured defined by Morrey et al. Overall, 73 patients (33 male, 40 female) with an average age of 38 years (+/- 13 years) could be included.

RESULTS

Conservative treatment had good clinical results for ROM and elbow function. After 6 weeks mean flexion was 131° (SD 13°), extension 8° (SD 7°), Pronation 83° (SD 11°) and Supination 83° (SD 13). Patients with a good elbow function after one week showed a good elbow function after completing the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical assessment after one week should always be performed and the study showed that it is a good predictor for good elbow function. In cases of bad elbow function further controls should be considered.

Prognostic Factors of Function in Nonoperatively Treated Radial Head Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To identify patient-related factors and fracture characteristics influencing the functional outcomes of nonoperatively treated radial head fractures and to determine function at 1 year.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive isolated radial head fractures fitting the inclusion criteria between May 2013 and July 2016.

INTERVENTION

Nonoperative treatment of isolated radial head fractures.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Logistic regressions between potential prognostic factors and function assessed with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and range of motion at 1.5-3-6-12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients were included (78% Mason I [OTA/AO 2R1B1], 20% Mason II [OTA/AO 2R1B3], and 2% Mason III [OTA/AO 2R1C3]). Mean MEPS and DASH score at the last follow-up were excellent [96.4 ± 7.6 and 3.7 ± 8.6] with, respectively, 79.8% and 92.7% of satisfactory results. Depressive symptoms at injury baseline (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology > 5) are a constant predictor of unsatisfactory function (MEPS <90 or DASH >17]). Older age and female sex were all linked to worse function at the first follow-ups ( P < 0.05), whereas lower socioeconomic class and receiving financial compensations were associated to unsatisfactory function at 1 year ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most nonoperatively treated radial head fractures heal with excellent function, some patients still exhibit unsatisfactory results at 1 year. Symptoms of depression at injury baseline are a constant and significant predictor of unsatisfactory function. Early detection of depressive symptoms would allow for interventions that may optimize function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Simple Versus Comminuted Radial Head Fractures: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

Current teaching suggests that modified Mason type III and IV fractures of the radial head involving more than 3 fragments should be treated with radial head arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of simple (2 or fewer intra-articular pieces) versus comminuted (3 or more intra-articular pieces) radial head fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 35 patients with modified Mason type III and IV fractures treated with ORIF. For the purpose of our study, simple fractures were defined as having 2 or fewer intra-articular fragments. Comminuted fractures were defined as having 3 or more intra-articular fragments. The primary outcomes were Broberg and Morrey rating system and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. Reoperation rates and complications were also noted.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 39.3 months. Thirteen patients had radial head fractures consisting of 2 or fewer intra-articular fragments. Twenty-two patients had radial head fractures consisting of 3 or more intra-articular fragments. Ages and follow-up times were similar in the 2 groups. Similar QuickDASH and Broberg and Morrey scores were seen when evaluating subgroups of 2, 3, and 4 fragment fractures. One patient from each group underwent revision surgery for symptomatic hardware.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, we found similar clinical outcome scores and reoperation rates between simple and comminuted radial head fractures treated with ORIF. Fractures with more than 3 intra-articular fragments can be considered for ORIF.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

A combined experimental and finite element analysis of the human elbow under loads of daily living

Elbow trauma is often accompanied by a loss of independence in daily self-care activities, negatively affecting patients' quality of life. Finite element models can help gaining profound knowledge about native human joint mechanics, which is crucial to adequately restore joint functionality after severe injuries. Therefore, a finite element model of the elbow is required that includes both the radio-capitellar and ulno-trochlear joint and is subjected to loads realistic for activities of daily living. Since no such model has been published, we aim to fill this gap. For comparison, 8 intact cadaveric elbows were subjected to loads of up to 1000 N, after they were placed in an extended position. At each load step, the displacement of the proximal humerus relative to the distal base plate was measured with optical tracking markers and the joint pressure was measured with a pressure mapping sensor. Analogously, eight finite element models were created based on subject-specific CT scans of the corresponding elbow specimens. The CT scans were registered to the positions of tantalum beads in the experiment. The optically measured displacements were applied as boundary conditions. We demonstrated that the workflow can predict the experimental contact pressure distribution with a moderate correlation, the experimental peak pressures in the correct joints and the experimental stiffness with moderate to excellent correlation. The predictions of peak pressure magnitude, contact area and load share on the radius require improvement by precise representation of the cartilage geometry and soft tissues in the model, and proper initial contact in the experiment.

Variation in radial head fracture treatment recommendations in terrible triad injuries is not influenced by viewing two-dimensional computed tomography

BACKGROUND

We analyzed association between viewing two-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) images in addition to radiographs with radial head treatment recommendations after accounting for patient and surgeon factors in a survey-based experiment.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four surgeons reviewed 15 patient scenarios with terrible triad fracture dislocations of the elbow. Surgeons were randomized to view either radiographs only or radiographs and 2D CT images. The scenarios randomized patient age, hand dominance, and occupation. For each scenario, surgeons were asked if they would recommend fixation or arthroplasty of the radial head. Multi-level logistic regression analysis identified variables associated with radial head treatment recommendations.

RESULTS

Reviewing 2D CT images in addition to radiographs had no statistical association with treatment recommendations. A higher likelihood of recommending prosthetic arthroplasty was associated with older patient age, patient occupation not requiring manual labor, surgeon practice location in the United States, practicing for five years or less, and the subspecialties "trauma" and "shoulder and elbow."

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that in terrible triad injuries, the imaging appearance of radial head fractures has no measurable influence on treatment recommendations. Personal surgeon factors and patient demographic characteristics may have a larger role in surgical decision making. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic case-control study.

Current concepts in the management of radial head fractures: a national survey and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to report on current practice in the management of radial head fractures (RHFs) in the United Kingdom and to review the literature to identify areas for future investigation.

METHODS

A 12-question online survey was sent to 500 surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society in 2021. Questions focused on clinical assessment, indications for surgical treatment and willingness to participate in future studies. Descriptive statistical analysis summarised the responses.

RESULTS

The response rate was 20.4% (n = 102). For minimally displaced RHFs, non-operative management with immediate mobilisation was reported by 90.2% (n = 92) as opposed to 9.8% (n = 10) for initial immobilisation in plaster or brace. The most cited indication for radial head arthroplasty as opposed to fixation was increased patient age or low functional demand in 69.9% of responses (n = 71). In total, 41.2% (n = 42) indicated the need for a future randomised controlled trial (RCT) concerning the management of RHF. Only five RCTs were returned by the literature review.

DISCUSSION

There is considerable variability in the management of RHF among an experienced cohort of surgeons. With the interest declared by the participating surgeons, there is a call for a well-designed sufficiently powered RCT.

Is implant choice associated with fixation strength for displaced radial neck fracture: a network meta-analysis of biomechanical studies

The multitude of fixation options for radial neck fractures, such as pins, screws, biodegradable pins and screws, locking plates, and blade plates, has led to a lack of consensus on the optimal implant choice and associated biomechanical properties. This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical strength of various fixation constructs in axial, sagittal, and torsional loading directions. We included biomechanical studies comparing different interventions, such as cross/parallel screws, nonlocking plates with or without augmented screws, fixed angle devices (T or anatomic locking plates or blade plates), and cross pins. A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL EBSCO databases was conducted on September 26th, 2022. Data extraction was carried out by one author and verified by another. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Primary outcomes encompassed axial, bending, and torsional stiffness, while the secondary outcome was bending load to failure. Effect sizes were calculated for continuous outcomes, and relative treatment ranking was measured using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Our analysis encompassed eight studies, incorporating 172 specimens. The findings indicated that fixed angle constructs, specifically the anatomic locking plate, demonstrated superior axial stiffness (mean difference [MD]: 23.59 N/mm; 95% CI 8.12-39.06) in comparison to the cross screw. Additionally, the blade plate construct excelled in bending stiffness (MD: 32.37 N/mm; 95% CI - 47.37 to 112.11) relative to the cross screw construct, while the cross-screw construct proved to be the most robust in terms of bending load failure. The parallel screw construct performed optimally in torsional stiffness (MD: 139.39 Nm/degree; 95% CI 0.79-277.98) when compared to the cross screw construct. Lastly, the nonlocking plate, locking T plate, and cross-pin constructs were found to be inferior in most respects to alternative interventions. The NMA indicated that fixed angle devices (blade plate and anatomic locking plate) and screw fixations may exhibit enhanced biomechanical strength in axial and bending directions, whereas cross screws demonstrated reduced torsional stability in comparison to parallel screws. It is imperative for clinicians to consider the application of these findings in constraining forces across various directions during early range of motion exercises, taking into account the distinct biomechanical properties of the respective implants.

Treatment of comminuted radial head fractures with personalized radial head prosthesis produced with 3-dimensional printing technology

BACKGROUND

The radial head is the forearm's pivot point for supination-pronation. Although radial head resection can be performed in comminuted radial head fractures, radial head prosthesis has gained popularity in order to prevent possible complications such as progressive valgus instability in the elbow and secondary ulnocarpal impaction that may develop due to proximal displacement of the radius. As for radial head prostheses, standard prosthetic designs do not provide the same results in everyone, and the alignment of the radial head and radial neck angle cannot be fully achieved. We believe that the radial head must be reconstructed with a complete anatomical implant. We designed and applied personalized prostheses to our patients, and in this study, we wished to share the 2-year results of these patients.

METHODS

In this study, 23 patients who had comminuted radial head fractures had personalized radial head prostheses inserted. Preoperative variables such as type of injury, age, side, additional ligament injury, operation time, number of radial head parts, neck angle of individual prosthesis, stem length, and stem diameter were noted. The mean operating time was 26 ± 9 minutes. One month postoperatively, after physical therapy, elbow range of motion, loss of strength compared to the opposite joint, Mayo elbow scores, QuickDASH scores, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Patients were evaluated 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

QuickDASH and Mayo elbow scores were satisfactorily good (mean QuickDASH score: 9.091, mean Mayo score: 91.08). According to the results of the patient satisfaction questionnaire, 16 of the 23 patients reported excellent satisfaction, 5 patients good satisfaction, and 2 patients moderate satisfaction. None of the patients reported poor results.

DISCUSSION

Since personalized radial head prosthesis consists of a single monoblock, its surgical application consists of a single step and has a short operating time. As the applications in the literature increase and more studies are conducted, this subject will be better understood. Our study demonstrated that these patients, whose anatomies were individually replicated, achieved good range of motion and patient satisfaction. In fact, none of the patients reported negative results. In comminuted radial head fractures, surgical implantation of personalized radial head prosthesis is a treatment modality with easy application, short operating time, and good functional results.

Elbow Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Radial Head Fractures: Surgical Technique and 10 Years of Follow Up Results Compared to Open Surgery

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe the ARIF (Arthroscopic Reduction Internal Fixation) technique for radial head fractures and to compare the results with ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) at mean 10 years.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients affected by Mason II or III fractures of the radial head who underwent ARIF or ORIF by screws fixation were retrospectively selected and evaluated. A total of 13 patients were treated (40.6%) by ARIF and 19 patients (59.4%) by ORIF. Mean follow-up was 10 years (7-15 years). All patients underwent MEPI and BMRS scores at follow-up, and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

No statistical significance was reported in Surgical Time (p = 0.805) or BMRS (p = 0.181) values. Significative improvement was recorded in MEPI score (p = 0.036), and between ARIF (98.07, SD ± 4.34) and ORIF (91.57, SD ± 11.67). The ARIF group showed lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially regarding stiffness (15.4% with ORIF at 21.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The radial head ARIF surgical technique represents a reproducible and safe procedure. A long learning curve is required, but with proper experience, it represents a tool that might be beneficial for patients, as it allows a radial head fracture to be treated with minimal tissue damage, evaluation and treatment of the concomitant lesions, and with no limitation of the positioning of screws.

Non-union of Conservatively Managed Radial Neck Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review

Non-union of radial neck fractures in adults is rare. This review aims to identify factors contributing to the non-union of undisplaced radial neck fractures and assess treatment options and outcomes.

Systematic searches of English articles in PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were undertaken in September 2021 according to the PRISMA guidelines. The search terms were (fracture) AND (radial neck) AND (non-union OR non-union). Eligible studies reported adults who experienced undisplaced radial neck fractures that went on to non-union without prior surgical intervention.

Fifteen case reports/series were included involving 29 non-unions in 27 patients. The largest study included eight patients. There were 11 males (38%) and 18 females (62%). The average age at the time of the presentation was 55 (range: 29-73). In 13 cases, comorbidities were commented on, including association with smoking in 4 (30%), diabetes in 3 (23%), and excessive alcohol in 5 (38%). The average time from injury to a diagnosis of non-union was 6.7 (range: 2-24) months. The average time of follow-up was 28.6 (range:6-84) months. Eight minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic non-unions were managed conservatively without complication. Seventeen symptomatic non-unions were managed operatively. Treatments included open fixation (1), open fixation with bone grafting (1), bone grafting alone (2), arthroplasty (2), radial head resection (2), and unknown surgery (7). Patients managed operatively achieved full or near-full, asymptomatic range of motion at an average of 5.4 (3-12) months postoperatively.

Non-union is a rare complication of an adult radial neck fracture, and risk factors may include female gender, smoking, diabetes, and chronic alcohol. Persistence with non-operative management is encouraged as it can resolve symptoms with or without a radiographic union. Operative options range from bone grafting +/- fixation to arthroplasty. On average, the time from injury to the decision made to operate is 6.5 (3-12) months. A comfortable, functional range of motion is possible with all treatment strategies.

Terrible triad injuries are no longer terrible! Functional outcomes of terrible triad injuries: a scoping review

Background

The terrible triad injury (TTI) of the elbow is a combination of a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint combined with fractures of the radial head and coronoid process most often caused by a fall on an outstretched hand. The injury pattern was named for its poor outcomes and high complication rates following surgical repair, but increased understanding of elbow anatomy and biomechanics has led to the development of standardized surgical protocols in an attempt to improve outcomes. Most existing literature on terrible triad injuries is from small retrospective cohort studies and surgical techniques to improve outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the functional outcomes, prognosis, and complications following current surgical treatment of TTIs.

Methods

A scoping review was performed to evaluate the literature. In total, 617 studies were identified and screened by 2 reviewers, with 43 studies included for qualitative analysis. These 43 studies underwent data extraction for functional outcomes using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH) and were stratified accordingly. Secondary outcome measures assessed in the study were a range of motion (ROM) and complication rate.

Results

The average MEPS was 90 (excellent) from a total of 37 studies with 1609 patients, and the average DASH score was 16 from 16 studies with 441 patients. Another 6 studies with a total of 127 patients reported a mean Q-DASH score of 13. A total of 39 studies consisting of 1637 patients had a mean forearm rotation of 135 degrees, and 36 studies consisting of 1606 patients had a mean flexion-extension arc of 113 degrees. Among the studies, there was a 30% complication rate with a need for revision surgery in 7.8% of cases. The most common complications were radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification (11%) and ulnar nerve neuropathy (2.6%).

Discussion/Conclusions

This study shows that current surgical treatment for terrible triad injuries has resulted in improved outcomes. Based on primary outcome measures using MEPS and DASH scores, almost all of the studies have highlighted good or excellent functional outcomes. This highlighted the marked improvement in outcome scores since the term was coined, suggesting that terrible triad injuries may no longer be so terrible.

Efficacy and safety of monopolar versus bipolar radial head arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Radial head replacement is the main line of treating complex unstable elbow injuries. Radial head prostheses are either monopolar or bipolar. The difference between both designs in patients' clinical outcomes and postoperative complications is not yet clear. So, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monopolar vs. bipolar implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched to identify studies comparing monopolar and bipolar implants. Data on clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, revision, and removal rates were extracted.

RESULTS

Nine studies met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 591 patients (365 monopolar and 226 bipolar). Both prostheses achieved similar ranges of motion; Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; and visual analog scale for pain. Incidence of postoperative complications was also similar between both designs. Revision and removal rates were 24%, 8% and 29%, 14% for monopolar and bipolar implants, respectively, but no statistically significant difference could be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found between monopolar and bipolar radial head prostheses in terms of efficacy and safety. Therefore, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to determine the superiority of one design over the other.

Bilateral Radial Head Fracture Secondary to Weighted Push-Up Exercise: Case Report and Review of Literature of a Rare Injury

A 33-year-old male presented with bilateral radial head fractures after weighted prone push-up exercise. The patient had Mason type I and II on right and left sides, respectively. He was managed conservatively with limited immobilisation and early range of motion exercises. The fracture healed and patient had no complaints at the last follow-up of 13 months. Bilateral radial head fracture is rare with push-up exercise, and can be successfully treated conservatively with immobilisation and early rehabilitation. Although push-up exercises are an excellent workout with known benefits, unusual modifications of standard techniques should be avoided.

An Unusual Terrible Triad Variant Associated with an Essex-Lopresti Injury

Essex-Lopresti injuries and terrible triad injuries of the elbow are rare injuries that typically result from high-energy trauma such as falling from a height or a motor vehicle collision. However, the combination of an Essex-Lopresti injury and terrible triad injury is unique and poses a significant challenge for treatment as these injuries are independently associated with poor functional outcomes if they are not acutely diagnosed. We describe a case of a 19-year-old who presented with an unusual variant of a terrible triad injury associated with an Essex-Lopresti injury. The patient had a distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and elbow dislocation, a radial head and coronoid process fracture, and a distal radius fracture. Almost a reverse Essex-Lopresti, this injury was successfully managed with open reduction and repair of the distal radius, radial head, and damaged ligaments in the elbow, along with an internal joint stabilizer (IJS).

Radial head fractures

Radial head fractures are the commonest fractures in the elbow. They are often associated with other injuries: ligamentous, cartilaginous or other fractures. Associated injuries are important determinant of the management of the radial head fracture. These should be carefully looked for, diagnosed and treated. The original Mason classification for this fracture has been modified to include the associated injuries and their treatment. CT scan is a helpful diagnostic tool and should be used if available. Radial head fractures can be treated either conservatively or operatively (by excision, open reduction and internal fixation or prosthetic replacement). Undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures should be treated non-operatively. Internal fixation by headless cannulated screws is the preferred treatment for displaced fractures. It provides satisfactory biomechanical stability, can be done through a smaller incision, has less complications and lesser requirement of later removal of screws. Small number of fractures with comminution of neck would require plate fixation. Unfixable fractures in elderly can be treated by excision while such fractures in younger population or associated with significant soft tissue or bony injuries would require prosthetic replacement.

Midterm outcomes of 146 EVOLVE Proline modular radial head prostheses: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The EVOLVE implant (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA) is a modular loose-fitting radial head prosthesis. The primary objective was to synthesize all available literature investigating the midterm clinical outcomes of the EVOLVE implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic literature search in Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was performed querying for studies published in 2000-2017. Articles describing clinical and radiographical outcomes as well as reoperation were included. Outcomes of interest included range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand, radiographic outcome, and reason for reoperation.

RESULTS

A total of five articles consisting of 146 patients with EVOLVE implants were included. Mean patient age was 57.4 years (range 22-84), and 43.8% were males (n = 64). Mean follow-up was 4.8 years (range 1-14). Mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score were 87.6 (range 30-100) and 18.9 (range 0-82), respectively. Midterm clinical results were good or excellent (Mayo Elbow Performance Score > 74) in 94 patients. Reoperation was observed in 12 patients, with implant revision required in 2 patients. The primary reason for reoperation was persistent stiffness (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

Midterm outcomes of EVOLVE radial head prosthesis are satisfactory, and associated complication rates are low. Loose-fit implant method appears to be a reliable approach to avoid failure of radial head prosthesis by painful loosening.

Biodegradable magnesium vs. polylactide pins for radial head fracture stabilization: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Biodegradable implants have gained increasing importance for the fixation of simple displaced radial head fractures to supersede implant removal and to minimize cartilage destruction. Commonly used polylactide pins still lead to higher rates of secondary loss of reduction compared with metal implants. Alternatively, implants made from a magnesium alloy meanwhile are available in a pin design that hypothetically could perform better than polylactide pins. Because biomechanical data of clinical applications are lacking, the goal of the present study was to biomechanically compare magnesium pins to polylactide pins using a Mason type II radial head fracture model.

METHODS

Fourteen pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaver radii with a standardized Mason type II radial head fracture were stabilized either by two 2.0-mm polylactide pins (PPs) or two 2.0-mm magnesium pins (MPs). Biomechanical in vitro testing was conducted as 10 cycles of static loading at 0.1 Hz axially and transversally between 10 and 50 N. Afterward, loosening was tested by dynamic load changes at 4 Hz up to 100,000 cycles. Early fracture displacement was measured after 10,000 cycles. Afterward, maximum loads were raised every 10,000 cycles by 15 N until construct failure, which was defined as fracture displacement ≥2 mm.

RESULTS

MP osteosynthesis showed a tendency toward higher primary stability on both axial (MP: 0.19 kN/mm, PP: 0.11 kN/mm; P = .068) and transversal loading (MP: 0.11 kN/mm, PP: 0.10 kN/mm; P = .068). Early fracture displacement was significantly higher following PP osteosynthesis (MP: 0.3 mm, PP: 0.7 mm; P = .030). The superiority of MP was also significant during cyclic loading, represented in a higher failure cycle (MP: 30,684, PP: 5113; P = .009) and in higher failure loads (MP: 95 N, PP: 50 N; P = .024).

CONCLUSION

According to our findings, in simple radial head fractures, osteosynthesis with magnesium pins show superior biomechanical properties compared with fractures treated by polylactide pins. Prospective investigations should follow to evaluate clinical outcomes and resorption behavior.

Radial head fractures

Radial head fractures are a common fracture involving the elbow joint. Patients typically present after a fall onto an outstretched hand with elbow pain and swelling. Without adequate treatment, this can lead to long-term complications, including loss of elbow motion and pain. Radial head fractures may also be associated with other injuries including elbow dislocation, neighbouring bony fractures and associated ligamentous rupture. It is therefore imperative that hospital clinicians understand the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. The plain radiograph is the optimum method to diagnose a radial head fracture. These fractures can be managed using a variety of techniques, from non-surgical conservative methods for the undisplaced fracture through to surgical fixation, radial head replacement and excision for the more complex, displaced fracture.

Proximal radioulnar translocations in adults: a tertiary centre study

We present three cases of proximal radioulnar translocation in adults. Although rare, it is most commonly seen in paediatric cases. There have been three previously documented cases in adults, all requiring surgery and associated with ulnohumeral dislocations. Two of our cases required operative intervention, whilst one was reduced closed and did not require stabilisation. Furthermore, we have for the first time shown that proximal radioulnar translocations can occur in isolation in adults without an ulnohumeral dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Elbow contracture following operative fixation of fractures about the elbow

BACKGROUND

The rates of elbow contracture and contracture release after surgically treated elbow trauma are poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to define the incidence of elbow contracture diagnosis and release after surgical treatment for elbow trauma.

METHODS

The Humana insurance database was queried using the PearlDiver Patient Records Database between 2007 and 2017. Subjects were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in combination with Current Procedural Terminology codes and were included if they had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Qualifying operative elbow trauma patients were queried for development of postoperative elbow contracture. Patient demographic characteristics, risk factors for elbow stiffness, and use of postoperative anticoagulation were recorded. Fracture severity was classified based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Logistic multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for postoperative elbow contracture.

RESULTS

The study population included 10,672 patients who were surgically treated for elbow trauma. In total, 902 patients (8.4%) were diagnosed with a contracture following fracture. Of patients with a diagnosis of elbow contracture, 65 patients (7.2%) underwent contracture release. On average, time to contracture diagnosis was 3.6 months (SD 7 months) and time to contracture release was 8.4 months (SD 3.6 months). The use of postoperative anticoagulation, burn or head injury at the time of fracture, male sex, obesity, opioid use, and moderate or severe fracture severity were significantly associated with progression to elbow contracture.

CONCLUSION

The development of elbow contracture after surgical treatment of elbow trauma has a relatively high incidence of 8.4%.

Ex situ reconstruction of comminuted radial head fractures: is it truly worth a try?

INTRODUCTION

Complex radial head fractures are difficult to treat. In cases where stable fixation cannot be achieved, radial head resection or primary arthroplasty are frequently performed. Ex situ reconstruction of comminuted fractures may also be an option. This technique has widely been neglected in the literature, and only two small case series report satisfactory results. The aim of the present case series was to determine the functional and radiological outcomes of ex situ reconstructed Mason III and Mason IV fractures. We expect that the on-table reconstruction of comminuted radial head fractures will lead to bony union with no avascular necrosis in the postoperative course, which will demonstrate that this operative procedure is a reasonable option.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two Mason type III and seven Mason type IV fractures (including four Monteggia-like lesions) were reconstructed ex situ. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range 22-64). The clinical examination included RoM tests, elbow stability tests, and a neurological examination. The functional outcome was assessed with the MEPS and DASH score. The radiographic examination included a.p. and lateral views of the elbow to detect non-unions, inadequacy or loss of reduction, radial head necrosis, heterotopic ossifications and signs of posttraumatic arthritis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 39 months (range 11-64). The mean MEPS was 82 points (range 15-100), and the mean DASH score was 20 points (range 0-85). All ex situ-reconstructed radial heads survived, and no signs of avascular necrosis were observed. Bony union was achieved in all but one patient who presented with an asymptomatic non-union. Signs of posttraumatic arthritis were found in all patients. With regard to the radial head, neither secondary resection nor arthroplasty had to be performed. All patients returned to their pre-injury occupations.

CONCLUSION

Ex situ radial head reconstruction can be a reliable option in the surgical treatment of complex radial head fractures associated with severe elbow trauma. Even in the midterm follow-up, no signs of avascular necrosis were observed. Modern implants may even extend the indications for reconstruction in such cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective cohort study.

Biomechanical dynamic comparison of biodegradable pins and titanium screws for operative stabilization of displaced radial head fractures

For radial head osteosynthesis, biodegradable implants are gaining in importance to minimize cartilage destruction and implant impingement and to supersede implant removal. Since loss of reduction and pseudarthrosis remain challenging complications, new implants should at least provide comparable biomechanical properties as commonly used metal implants. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment by polylactide pins to titanium screws and to quantify the produced cartilage defects. Eight pairs of human cadaver radii with a standardized Mason type II fracture were stabilized either by two 2.0-mm polylactide pins or titanium screws. The produced cartilage defects were quantified using an image analyzing software. Quasi-static loading was performed axially and transversally for 10 cycles each between 10 and 50 N. Afterward, implant loosening was tested by axial loading up to 10,000 cycles, followed by load to failure testing. Polylactide pins showed less construct stiffness under axial (p = 0.017) and transversal (p = 0.012) loading, and one polylactide pins construct failed after two cycles of transversal loading. At axial loading, a high correlation between bone mineral density and construct stiffness was observed among polylactide pins (R = 0.667; p = 0.071), which was not seen among titanium screws (R = 0.262; p = 0.531). No difference in implant loosening was recorded after 10,000 cycles (p = 0.237); however, one polylactide pins construct failed after 30 cycles and failure loads were higher for titanium screws (p=0.017). Polylactide pin produced smaller cartilage defects (p=0.012). In conclusion, simple radial head fractures treated by polylactide pins show less biomechanical stability than treated by titanium screws, particularly in osteoporotic bone which might lead to secondary loss of reduction. Due to smaller cartilage defects and equal properties under continuous loading, polylactide pins might represent a gentle alternative in patients with good bone quality making subsequent implant removal redundant.

Evaluating the Utility of Follow-up Radiographs for Isolated Radial Head Fractures Undergoing Initial Nonoperative Treatment

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of follow-up radiographs in patients with isolated partial articular radial head fractures (OTA/AO 2R1B1 or 2R1B3).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients (≥18 years) with isolated partial articular radial head fractures indicated for initial nonoperative treatment.

INTERVENTION

Analysis of elbow radiographs at initial presentation and at postinjury follow-up of 3-8 weeks.

VARIABLES MEASURED

Articular gap and step-off.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Radiographic articular displacement between initial and follow-up radiographs.

RESULTS

For 72 included patients, initial radiographs were obtained on average 2.6 days after injury and follow-up radiographs 33.7 days thereafter. Equivalence tests evaluating gap and step-off thresholds of <1 mm were both significant, indicating that the cohort displaced <1 mm for both parameters between initial and follow-up radiographs. No patients proceeded to surgical treatment following the repeat radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

These fractures do not displace in the early postinjury period, as defined as a <1 mm of change in both intra-articular gap and step-off, as compared to initial radiographs. Routine follow-up radiographs for these injuries is a source of cost, but with limited utility in detecting interval displacement or leading to a change in management. Selective use of radiographs to evaluate specific clinical concerns may lead to cost savings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A biomechanical study of headless compression screws versus a locking plate in radial head fracture fixation

HYPOTHESIS

Fixation of a 3-part radial head fracture with cannulated compression screws will show equivalent stiffness to a locking plate under axial load. Debate exists regarding the management of Mason type III fractures, with many believing that open reduction and internal fixation provides advantages over other options. By virtue of their subarticular placement, screw fixation is less likely to cause impingement compared with plate fixation, which can result in loss of rotation and requirement for hardware removal. Insufficient fixation stability can lead to nonunions, necrosis of the radial head, pain, and instability. We tested the mechanical stability of fixation of simulated radial head fractures using headless compression screws compared with standard plate construct.

METHODS

Standardized test constructs were created with repeatable osteotomy cuts and hardware placement on each Synbone model (Synbone AG, Malans, Switzerland). We presectioned 22 proximal radius Synbone models to simulate a 3-part radial head fracture. The models were fixed using a radial head locking plate or headless compression screws in a tripod construct. The constructs were potted into a compression test jig using 2-part epoxy resin. Compression testing was performed using a 30-kN Instron Universal machine (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA). The compression tool was spherical, representing the surface of the capitellum.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the stiffness of the Synbone constructs under axial load.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between fixation stiffness of a 3-part radial head fracture with headless compression screws in a tripod structure vs. a locking plate in Synbone. Further study is required to allow clinical application.

Analysis of radial head and coronoid process fractures in terrible triad of elbow

PURPOSE

To describe the morphological characteristics of radial head and coronoid fractures and evaluate the relationship of two fracture patterns in terrible triad.

METHODS

Distributions of all types of radial head and coronoid fractures according to the Mason, Regan-Morrey, and O'Driscoll classifications were firstly described by reviewing radiographs and computed tomography scans in 92 consecutive terrible triads. Then, distributions of all combinations of radial head and coronoid fractures were reported. Correlation analysis between severity of radial head and coronoid fractures was finally performed.

RESULTS

In radial head fractures, Mason 2 accounted for 68%, Mason 3 accounted for 32%, and no Mason 1 was found. In coronoid fractures, there were 29 type 1, 44 type 2, and 19 type 3 in Regan-Morrey classification and 72 type 1, one type 2, and 19 type 3 in O'Driscoll classification. There were 28 M2R2, 23 M2R1, 16 M3R2, 12 M2R3, seven M3R3, and six M3R1 in combined Mason and Regan-Morrey type. There were 53 M2O1, 19 M3O1, 10 M3O3, nine M2O3, and one M2O2 in combined Mason and O'Driscoll type. A weak correlation was found between radial head and coronoid fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

In terrible triad injuries, the most common type of radial head fracture is Mason 2, while the most common type of coronoid fracture is Regan-Morrey type 2 or O'Driscoll type 1. In combinations of two fracture patterns, M2R2 or M2O1 is the most common. Severity of radial head fractures is weakly correlated with coronoid fractures.

Comminuted Radial Head Fracture in All-arthroscopic Repair of Elbow Fracture-dislocation: Is Partial Excision of the Radial Head an Acceptable Treatment Option?

Background

In elbow fracture-dislocation, partial excision of the comminuted radial head fracture that is not amenable to fixation remains controversial considering the accompanying symptoms. This study was undertaken to evaluate the results of radial head partial excision when the comminuted radial head fracture involved <50% of the articular surface in all-arthroscopic repair of elbow fracture-dislocation.

Methods

Patients were divided into two groups based on the condition of the radial head fracture. In Group A, the patients had a radial head comminuted fracture involving <50% of the articular surface, and underwent arthroscopic partial excision. Group B was the non-excision group comprising patients with stable and non-displacement fractures. Follow-up consultations were conducted at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

Results

In all, 19 patients (Group A: 11; Group B: 8) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. At the final follow-up, all 19 patients showed complete resolution of elbow instability. No significant differences were observed in the range of motion, visual analogue scale score, and Mayo elbow performance score between groups. Radiological findings did not show any complications of the radiocapitellar joint. However, nonunion of the coracoid fracture was observed in 3 patients (Group A: 1; Group B: 2), without any accompanying instability and clinical symptoms.

Conclusions

Considering that the final outcome is coronoid fracture fixation and lateral collateral ligament complex repair for restoring elbow stability, arthroscopic partial excision for radial head comminuted fractures involving <50% of articular surface is an effective and acceptable treatment for elbow fracture-dislocation.

Options and limits of angle stable plates in the treatment of comminuted radial head fractures

Objective

New angle-stable plates provide more stability and better anatomical fit than previous plates.

Methods

22 patients treated with an angle-stable plate were included. Postoperative the outcomes were evaluated according to the scoring systems of Morrey, Radin and Riseborough.

Results

3 patients received a score of excellent, 14 good, and 5 satisfactory. We detected 3 cases of implant failure and 2 cases of postoperative neurological damage. 3 patientes received a radial head necrosis.

Conclusions

Our results show that the angle-stable radial head locking plate can only be used in limited cases in the treatment of multi-fragment radial head fractures.

Short to midterm outcomes of one hundred and seventy one MoPyC radial head prostheses: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The MoPyC implant is an uncemented long-stemmed radial head prosthesis that obtains primary press-fit fixation via controlled expansion of the stem. Current literature regarding MoPyC implants appears promising; however, sample sizes in these studies are small. Our primary objective was to evaluate the short- to midterm clinical outcomes of a large sample of the MoPyC prostheses. The secondary objective was to determine the reasons for failure of the MoPyC devices.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were queried for literature published between January 2000 and March 2017. Articles describing clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as reasons for reoperation were included. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain range of motion, mean Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), radiographic outcome, and reason for failure.

RESULTS

A total of five articles describing 171 patients (82 males) with MoPyC implants were included. Mean patient age and follow-up were 52 years (18-79) and 3.1 years (1-9), respectively. Midterm clinical results were good or excellent (MEPS > 74) in 157 patients. Overall complication rate was low (n = 22), while periprosthetic osteolysis was reported in 78 patients. Nineteen patients returned to the operating room, with implant revision being required in ten patients. The two primary reasons for failure were (intra-)prosthetic dislocation (n = 8) followed by stiffness (n = 7); no painful loosening was described.

CONCLUSION

Short- to midterm outcomes of MoPyC prostheses are satisfactory and complications associated are low. The use of stem auto-expansion as a mode of obtaining primary fixation in radial head arthroplasty appears to be an effective solution for reducing the risk of painful loosening.

[The proximal radioulnar joint in consideration of the distal radioulnar joint]

The movement of the forearm follows a complex interplay of three main components: the proximal and distal radioulnar joint and the interosseous membrane. Injuries to one or even all components have a huge impact on the integrity of this system. The Essex-Lopresti lesion presented a high challenge in clinical diagnostics as well as therapy. Reconstructions of the length and stability are essential for a satisfactory postoperative outcome. If a reconstruction of the radial head by osteosynthesis is not possible, a radial head prosthesis should be implanted in the case of longitudinal instability - avoiding overlapping and/or oversizing. The reconstruction of the interosseous membrane should be considered, as well as the assessment of the distal radioulnar joint and/or the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Various reconstruction options are available in this regard.

Treatment of Radial Head Fractures and Need for Revision Procedures at 1 and 2 Years

PURPOSE

Optimal treatment strategies for radial head fractures remain a subject of debate. We examined national practice patterns in the management of radial head fractures to determine rates of surgical treatment, type of surgery employed, and the incidence of reoperation.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2011, we identified patients with radial head fractures along with their associated injuries by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in a national database of orthopedic insurance records. For those who underwent surgery, the type of intervention was identified and each patient was observed to determine whether a subsequent procedure was needed by 1 and 2 years. Chi-square analysis was performed to make comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 58,404 radial head fractures were identified between 2007 and 2011; of these, 2,981 underwent surgical treatment (5.1%). Rates of surgical intervention were significantly higher in the context of associated injuries. Among the 2,981 radial head fractures treated surgically, 57.1% underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), 37.9% were treated with radial head arthroplasty, and 4.9% underwent radial head excision. When the surgically treated radial head fracture was associated with a coronoid fracture, elbow dislocation, or proximal ulna fracture, 64.2%, 54.3%, and 47.2% were treated with arthroplasty, respectively, compared with 32.6%, 41.9%, and 52.6% treated with ORIF, respectively. After initial surgical treatment, 12.7% and 14.4% of radial head fractures that underwent ORIF required a secondary surgery at 1 and 2 years, respectively, compared with 8.6% and 10.7% of radial head arthroplasties and 8.3% and 8.4% of resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of arthroplasty were significantly higher in the context of associated injury, particularly in the setting of a coronoid fracture or elbow dislocation. Fractures initially treated with ORIF had a higher rate of revision surgery at both 1 and 2 years after the index procedure compared with arthroplasty.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Treatment of Modified Mason Type III or IV Radial Head Fracture: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation versus Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The treatment of modified Mason Type III or IV fractures is controversial. Many authors report open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with reconstruction of the radial head, but others advocate radial head arthroplasty (RHA). This study compares the clinical and radiological outcomes of ORIF and RHA in modified Mason Type III or IV radial head fracture and evaluates correlations between prognostic factors and postoperative clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

42 patients with modified Mason Type III or IV radial head fractures who were surgically treated between January 2010 and January 2014 were retrospectively analyzed (20 patients with RHA and 22 patients with ORIF group were selected). Clinically, the patient rated elbow evaluation (PREE), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), and the range of motion (ROM) were measured. Radiologically, plain radiographs and computed tomography scans were taken.

RESULTS

The mean PREE scores were 13.9 for the RHA group and 13.0 for the ORIF group, and mean DASH scores were 9.5 and 10.7, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant. When comparing ROM, the patients in the RHA group showed greater movement at all measured angles. In multiple regression analysis, age was the only variable significantly associated with both PREE and DASH.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes of modified Mason Type III or IV radial head fractures treated with ORIF or RHA. However, a subgroup of younger patients had better clinical outcomes with ORIF treatment. Therefore, ORIF should be the First line of treatment, particularly if the reduction is possible.

The minimum follow-up required for radial head arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to define the standard minimum follow-up required to produce a reliable estimate of the rate of re-operation after radial head arthroplasty (RHA). The secondary objective was to define the leading reasons for re-operation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four electronic databases, between January 2000 and March 2017 were searched. Articles reporting reasons for re-operation (Group I) and results (Group II) after RHA were included. In Group I, a meta-analysis was performed to obtain the standard minimum follow-up, the mean time to re-operation and the reason for failure. In Group II, the minimum follow-up for each study was compared with the standard minimum follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were analysed: three were Group I and included 80 implants and 37 were Group II and included 1192 implants. In Group I, the mean time to re-operation was 1.37 years (0 to 11.25), the standard minimum follow-up was 3.25 years; painful loosening was the main indication for re-operation. In Group II, 33 Group II articles (89.2%) reported a minimum follow-up of < 3.25 years.

CONCLUSION

The literature does not provide a reliable estimate of the rate of re-operation after RHA. The reproducibility of results would be improved by using a minimum follow-up of three years combined with a consensus of the definition of the reasons for failure after RHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1561-70.

Mid-term outcomes of 77 modular radial head prostheses

AIMS

Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) may be used in the treatment of non-reconstructable radial head fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiographic results of RHA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2002 and 2014, 77 RHAs were implanted in 54 men and 23 women with either acute injuries (54) or with traumatic sequelae (23) of a fracture of the radial head. Four designs of RHA were used, including the Guepar (Small Bone Innovations (SBi)/Stryker; 36), Evolutive (Aston Medical; 24), rHead RECON (SBi/Stryker; ten) or rHead STANDARD (SBi/Stryker; 7) prostheses. The mean follow-up was 74.0 months (standard deviation (sd) 38.6; 24 to 141). The indication for further surgery, range of movement, mean Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score, quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) score, osteolysis and positioning of the implant were also assessed according to the design, and acute or delayed use.

RESULTS

The mean MEP and quickDASH scores were 90.2 (sd 14; 45 to 100), and 14.0 points (sd 12; 1.2 to 52.5), respectively. There were no significant differences between RHA performed in acute or delayed fashion. There were 30 re-operations (19 with, and 11 without removal of the implant) during the first three post-operative years. Painful loosening was the primary indication for removal in 14 patients. Short-stemmed prostheses (16 mm to 22 mm in length) were also associated with an increased risk of painful loosening (odds ratio 3.54 (1.02 to 12.2), p = 0.045). Radiocapitellar instability was the primary indication for re-operation with retention of the implant (5). The overall survival of the RHA, free from re-operation, was 60.8% (sd 5.7%) at ten years.

CONCLUSION

Bipolar and press-fit RHA gives unsatisfactory mid-term outcomes in the treatment of acute fractures of the radial head or their sequelae. The outcome may vary according to the design of the implant. The rate of re-operation during the first three years is predictive of the long-term survival in tight-fitting RHAs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B1197-1203.

Radial head prosthesis: results overview

Background/purpose

Radial head replacement is frequently used in treatment of radial head fractures or sequela. Impossibility to restore a correct anatomy, acute elbow traumatic instability and failure of osteosynthesis hardware are the most common indications. The authors describe their case studies and results on the implantation of various radial head prostheses.

Materials

Between June 2005 and June 2016, 28 radial head prostheses were implanted in the same number of patients with an average follow-up of 49 months (6–104). Indications for implantation were: Mason type III and IV radial head fractures and post-traumatic arthritis due to failure of previous treatments. Monopolar prostheses were used and were press-fit implanted via Kaplan’s lateral access and Kocher’s anconeus approach to the humeroradial joint. At the follow-up, assessments were made of the pain, according to the visual analogic scale, range of motion (ROM), stability and functionality according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, presence of osteolysis and mobilization during radiography tests, personal satisfaction of the patients, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcomes measurements.

Results

At the follow-up, we recorded an average level of pain of 1.8 in patients under acute treatments for radial head fractures and a marked reduction in the remaining cases from 6.7 to 2.1. ROM was found on average to be 107° of flexion–extension and 159° of pronosupination. Personal satisfaction was good–excellent in 23 cases. There was no case of infection; removal of the implant was necessary in three cases due to mobilization of the stem and oversized implants. In six cases, bone resorption was seen at the level of the prosthetic collar and it was in all cases asymptomatic.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that the use of prostheses, if well positioned, is a valid solution in the treatment of secondary arthritis and fractures of the radial head with poor prognosis, with good results in the reduction of pain, recovery of movement and improved quality of life.

Using an anatomically preshaped low-profile locking plate system leads to reliable results in comminuted radial head fractures

INTRODUCTION

For comminuted and displaced fractures of the radial head open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is recommended nowadays as the treatment of choice. Due to the development of locking plates the possibilities of ORIF in complex fracture types were extended. The purpose of this retrospective survey therefore was to review the preliminary subjective and objective results in patients treated by anatomically preshaped locked plating. A reliable fracture healing for these recently introduced plating devices was hypothesized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjective and objective criteria included patient's satisfaction, pain rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and active range of motion (ROM) compared to the contralateral armside. Functional scoring included the Morrey elbow performance score (MEPS), the QuickDASH and the elbow self-assessment score (ESAS). Furthermore, follow-up radiographs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2014 a total of 24 patients were managed with ORIF using anatomically preshaped low-profile locking plates. All patients had suffered from comminuted radial head fractures (type III-IV according to Mason classification). Twenty of 24 patients returned for follow-up examination after a mean of 30 months (range 18-53 months). Patients' satisfaction was rated as highly satisfied in 17 cases and satisfied in 3 cases. An unrestricted ROM for extension-flexion arc and pronation-supination arc was rated in 10 cases. Minor ROM deficiencies with a 5° limited extension compared to the contralateral side was evaluated in 6 cases. Only four patients were rated with and extension and supination deficiency of 10°, one of whom with an additional pronation deficiency of 10°. The calculated MEPS was Ø 98 ± 4 (range 85-100), and the QuickDASH was Ø 3 ± 6 (range 0-21). The ESAS was completed by 18 patients with a mean of Ø 96.54 ± 2.95 (range 94-100) indicating a non-restricted elbow function.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of comminuted radial head fractures using anatomically preshaped locking radial head plates represents a reliable and safe surgical approach, leading to good to excellent functional results. Being aware of the importance of the radial head for elbow stability, open reduction and internal fixation should be preferred prior to radial head resection or replacement in complex radial head fractures. Further trials with a higher number of patients are needed to confirm the advantages of preshaped radial head plates.

Trends in Management of Radial Head and Olecranon Fractures

Background:

Advancement in surgical techniques and implants has improved the ability to manage radial head and olecranon fractures. However, trends in management of these fractures are largely unstudied.

Objective:

This purpose of this study is to evaluate management trends for these common fractures.

Methods:

A retrospective review of a comprehensive Humana database was performed using Pearl Diver supercomputer (Warsaw, IN, USA) for radial head and neck (RHNF) and olecranon fractures (OF) between 2007 and 2014. Treatment methods including open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty (RHA), and non-operative treatment were reviewed. Total reported incidence of office visits and utilization of each treatment modality were investigated. Sub-analysis with stratification by age 15-74 and greater than 75-years was performed for OF.

Results:

A total of 10,609 OF and 20,400 RHNF were identified between 2007 and 2014. A significant trend increase in the annual incidence of RHNF (266 cases/year, p<0.001) and OF (133.9 cases/year, p=0.001) was observed. A significant trend increase in annual percent utilization of RHA (0.22% per year, p=0.011) and a significant trend decrease in the annual percent utilization of ORIF (-1.0% per year, p=0.004) and non-operative management (-0.53% per year, p=0.046) was observed for RHNF. A significant trend increase was observed in percent utilization (0.40% per year, p=0.022) for OF non-operative management, especially in patients over 75 years (66% per year, p=0.034).

Conclusion:

The percentage of patients being treated with RHA is increasing. Non-operative management of OF has increased, specifically in the patients who are over 75 years.

Nonsurgical treatment of Mason type II radial head fractures in athletes. A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The best treatment for moderately displaced radial head fractures (Mason type II) still remains controversial. In cases of isolated fractures, there is no evidence that a fragment displacement of ≥ 2 mm gives poor results in conservatively treated fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients (31M, 21F) affected by an isolated Mason type II fracture, treated with a long arm cast for two weeks between 2008 and 2013. All patients had practiced sports before being injured. They were all either bicyclists, or baseball, boxers, basketball, rugby, tennis or football players. The mean follow-up was 36 months. Elbow and forearm range of motion were measured. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the Broberg and Morrey rating system and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH score) were analyzed. Follow-up radiographs were examined for evidence of consolidation, late displacement, early arthritis and non-unions.

RESULTS

Flexion was slightly impaired in the injured limb when compared to the uninjured limb (137°± 6° versus 139°±5°) as were extension (-3°±6° versus 1°±4°, p < 0.05), supination (86°±6° versus 88°±3°), pronation (87°±4° versus 88°±6°) and valgus deviation (10°±4° versus 8°±3°, p < 0.05). 40 patients had no elbow complaints; 9 patients experienced occasional pain, 2 a mild instability of the elbow, and 4 a mild loss of grip strength. The DASH score was excellent in 48 patients (92.31%). In only 6 cases (11.53%) degenerative changes were greater in formerly injured elbows than in uninjured elbows. All patients returned to their previous sports activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated Mason type II fractures can have a good or excellent mid-term functional outcome even when treated conservatively.

On-table reconstruction and fixation of Mason type III radial head fractures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of comminuted radial head fractures, which were not amenable for classical open reduction with internal fixation, treated by on-table reconstruction and fixation using low profile plates.

METHODS

We reviewed 6 patients of Mason type III radial head fractures treated by on-table reconstruction technique between 2011 and 2013. There were 5 men and 1 woman with a mean age of 35 years (range 25-46 years). All surgeries were carried out at our tertiary care level 1 trauma centre within a mean of 3 days (range 1-8 days) from date of injury using on-table reconstruction technique. The functional outcome was measured using elbow functional rating index described by Broberg and Morrey and the patient-based Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 25 months. The average elbow flexion was 135°(range 125°-140°) and theaverage flexion contracture was 5°(range 0-10°). The average supination and pronation was 75°(range 70°-80°) and 70°(range 65°-82°) respectively. According to Broberg and Morrey scoring system, the average score was 90 points (range 75-100). The mean DASH score was 2.49 points.

CONCLUSION

On-table reconstruction and fixation of comminuted radial head fractures using low profile plates is a reasonable option. The reconstructed radial head acts as spacer and provides reasonably good results and no surgical intervention is required for asymptomatic nonunion of these fractures regardless of the radiological findings.

Radial head fracture associated with posterior interosseous nerve injury

Fractures of the radial head and radial neck correspond to 1.7–5.4% of all fractures and approximately 30% may present associated injuries. In the literature, there are few reports of radial head fracture with posterior interosseous nerve injury. This study aimed to report a case of radial head fracture associated with posterior interosseous nerve injury.

Case report

A male patient, aged 42 years, sought medical care after falling from a skateboard. The patient related pain and limitation of movement in the right elbow and difficulty to extend the fingers of the right hand. During physical examination, thumb and fingers extension deficit was observed. The wrist extension showed a slight radial deviation. After imaging, it became evident that the patient had a fracture of the radial head that was classified as grade III in the Mason classification. The patient underwent fracture fixation; at the first postoperative day, thumb and fingers extension was observed. Although rare, posterior interosseous nerve branch injury may be associated with radial head fractures. In the present case, the authors believe that neuropraxia occurred as a result of the fracture hematoma and edema.

[Locking plate osteosynthesis of the radial head fractures : clinical and radiological results]

BACKGROUND

Therapy of radial head fractures is still controversially discussed. Especially comminuted fractures are at risk of complications such as radial head necrosis, nonunion and secondary loss of reduction after open reduction and internal fixation. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic results of ORIF (open reduction internal fixation) of radial head fractures using a new radial head-specific locking plate system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 21 patients (13 men and 8 women) were treated with locking plate osteosynthesis of radial head fractures. Mean age was 50 years (range 29-67 years). According to the Mason classification, 15 were type III and 6 type IV. Mean time between trauma and surgery was 5.6 days (range 0-23 days). These patients were reexamined using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and x-rays in two planes.

RESULTS

In all, 21 patients were reexamined with a mean follow-up of 12.1 months (range 5-23 months). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 87.1. Excellent results were obtained in 12 patients, good results in 6 patients, and fair results in 3 patients. Mean extension deficit was 12.1°, mean flexion 135.2°, mean pronation 70.9°, and mean supination 63.6°. All fractures healed uneventfully. There was no complete radial head necrosis but one partial. Four cases of heterotopic ossification were detected: Hastings classification I (n = 2), IIb (n = 1), IIIb (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

ORIF of radial head fractures using locking plates can lead to good and excellent results. Modern implants may allow for reconstruction of comminuted fractures avoiding arthroplasty in these young patients.