Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor‒Associated Bullous Pemphigoid Is Characterized by an Altered Expression of Cytokines in the Skin

Serum inflammatory biomarkers associated with disease severity and response to dupilumab treatment in bullous pemphigoid: A cluster analysis

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a novel therapy targeting the T helper (Th) 2-mediated inflammation, is showing clinical benefits in treating bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, limited research investigated the serum biomarkers that reflect the inflammation alterations throughout the disease course.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the changes of the serum inflammatory biomarkers under dupilumab therapy in BP and establish their correlations with disease severity and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This exploratory study evaluated serum samples from 40 patients with BP at baseline, 30 of these patients following 16-week dupilumab therapy, and 20 senior healthy controls. Serum levels of 29 cytokines and chemokines were quantified using the Magnetic Luminex Assay.

RESULTS

Two distinct clusters based on serum inflammatory profiles were identified. The first cluster, characterized by elevated levels of inflammatory activation, exhibited worse disease severity and poorer remission outcomes. Following the 16-week dupilumab therapy regimen, a significant suppression of Th2-mediated inflammation in the serum was observed, alongside a relative upregulation of Th1 responses. Patients treated with adjuvant systemic steroids exhibited an enhanced suppression of B cell activating factor compared to those receiving dupilumab alone. Significant correlations were unveiled between Th2 biomarkers and clinical scores, eosinophil counts, and anti-BP180 immunoglobulin G levels. Baseline levels of CCL18, Periostin, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-16 constitute an optimal combination to distinguish between inflammatory clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

Cluster analysis of serum inflammatory biomarkers provided novel insights into the heterogeneity of the inflammation profiles in BP. Baseline levels of CCL18, Periostin, IL-6, IL-16 emerged as effective predictors for disease severity and therapy response to dupilumab.

New Insights into the Pleiotropic Actions of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Beyond Glycaemic Control

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is a multifunctional serine ectopeptidase that cleaves and modifies a plethora of substrates, including regulatory peptides, cytokines and chemokines. DPP-4 is implicated in the regulation of immune response, viral entry, cellular adhesion, metastasis and chemotaxis. Regarding its numerous substrates and extensive expression inside the body, multitasking DPP-4 has been assumed to participate in different pathophysiological mechanisms. DPP-4 inhibitors or gliptins are increasingly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Several reports from experimental and clinical studies have clarified that DPP-4 inhibitors exert many beneficial pleiotropic effects beyond glycaemic control, which are mediated by anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-fibrotic and anti-apoptotic actions. The present review will highlight the most recent findings in the literature about these pleiotropic effects and the potential mechanisms underlying these benefits, with a specific focus on the potential effectiveness of DPP-4 inhibitors in coronavirus disease-19 and diabetic kidney disease.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor-Related Bullous Pemphigoid: Clinical, Laboratory, and Histological Features, and Possible Pathogenesis

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) is a widely used antidiabetic agent. Emerging cases of DPP4i-associated bullous pemphigoid (DBP), whose pathogenesis remains unclear, have been reported. Thus, a retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to June 2021 to determine the clinical, laboratory, and histopathological features of DBP and idiopathic bullous pemphigoid (IBP). We set up in vitro experiments using vildagliptin-treated HaCaT keratinocytes to validate what we found by analyzing published RNA sequencing data about the genes related to the dermal-epidermal junction. We also observed IL-6 expression by HaCaT cells treated with vildagliptin. We enrolled 20 patients with DBP and 40 patients with IBP. The total Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) score was similar in both groups. However, the BPDAI score of erosions and blisters in DBP was significantly higher than that in IBP (24.6 vs. 16.68, p = 0.0189), and the score for urticaria and erythema was lower in DBP (12 vs. 19.05, p = 0.0183). The pathological features showed that the mean infiltrating eosinophil number per high-power field was significantly lower in DBP than in IBP (16.7 vs. 27.08, p = 0.023). The expression of LAMA3, LAMB3, LAMC2, DST, and COL17A1 decreased significantly in vildagliptin-treated human keratinocytes. On the other hand, IL-6, the hallmark cytokine of bullous pemphigoid (BP) severity, was found to be upregulated in HaCaT cells by vildagliptin. These experimental findings imply less of a requirement for eosinophil infiltration to drive the inflammatory cascades in DBP blistering. Both immunologic and non-immunologic pathways could be employed for the development of DBP. Our findings may help explain the higher incidence of non-inflammatory BP that was observed in DBP.