Urinary cell mRNA profiling of kidney allograft recipients: A systematic investigation of a filtration based protocol for the simplification of urine processing

Urine as liquid gold: the transcriptional landscape of acute rejection defined by urinary cell mRNA profiling of kidney allograft recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Because all functioning nephrons contribute to urine formation, we reasoned that urine would be a suitable substitute to kidney allograft biopsy to discern human kidney allograft status. In view of compelling data that ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing outperforms microarray-based profiling, we performed RNA sequencing of urinary cells and kidney allograft biopsies to define the transcriptional landscape of allograft rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Whole genome transcriptome profiling identified unique and shared gene signatures of acute T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody mediated rejection (AMR). We found that biopsy rejection signatures are enriched in urinary cells and that the immune cellular landscape is more diverse and enriched in urine compared to biopsies. Towards a patient friendly protocol for urinary cell messenger RNA (mRNA) profiling, we developed a filtration-based protocol for the initial processing of urine at home and demonstrated excellent performance characteristics of the filter- based protocol.

SUMMARY

Acute rejection signatures are enriched in urinary cells. Urinary cell mRNA profiles are diagnostic and prognostic of acute rejection and could serve as yardsticks of in-vivo immune status. RNA sequencing yields insights into mechanisms of rejection and helps prioritize therapeutic targets. The filtration protocol for home processing of urine may optimize immune surveillance.

Urinary cell mRNA profiling of kidney allograft recipients: Development of a portable protocol for noninvasive diagnosis of T cell mediated rejection and BK virus nephropathy

BACKGROUND

We developed urinary cell mRNA profiling for noninvasive diagnosis of acute T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), two significant post-transplant complications. Our profiling protocol for the multicenter Clinical Trial of Transplantation-04 (CTOT-04) study consisted of centrifugation of urine to prepare cell pellets, washes, addition of an RNA preservative, storage at 800C and shipment in cold containers to our Gene Expression Monitoring (GEM) Core for RNA isolation and quantification of mRNA in RT-qPCR assays. To simplify profiling, we developed a filter-based protocol (ZFBP) that eliminated the need for centrifugation, RNA preservative, storage at 800C, and shipment in cold containers for mRNA profiling. Furthermore, we trained kidney allograft recipients to perform the filtration of urine at home using the filter and post the urinary cell lysate containing the RNA at ambient temperature to our GEM Core for profiling. Here, we report our refinement of ZFBP and investigation of its diagnostic performance characteristics.

METHODS

Total RNA was isolated from kidney allograft biopsy-matched urines using a filter-based protocol complemented by a silica-membrane-based cartridge for mRNA enrichment, the Weill Cornell Hybrid Protocol (WCHP). Absolute copy numbers of CD3ε mRNA, CXCL10 mRNA, and 18S rRNA, components of the CTOT-04 three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature, and urinary cell BKV VP 1 mRNA copy number were measured using RT-qPCR assays. Mann-Whitney test, Fischer exact test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used for data analyses.

RESULTS

Urinary cell three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature scores in urines processed using the WCHP discriminated kidney allograft recipients with TCMR (12 TCMR biopsies from 11 patients) from those without TCMR or BKVN (29 No TCMR/No BKVN biopsies from 29 patients). The median (25th and 75th percentiles) score of the CTOT-04 three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature was -0.448 (-1.664, 0.204) in the TCMR group and - 2.542 (-3.267, -1.365) in the No TCMR/ No BKVN group (P = 0.0005, Mann-Whitney test). ROC curve analysis discriminated the TCMR group from the No TCMR/ No BKVN group; the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.84 (95% Confidence Intervals [CI], 0.69 to 0.98) (P < 0.001), and TCMR was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI, 35 to 89) at a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 67 to 95) using the CTOT-04 validated cutpoint of -1.213 (P = 0.0016, Fisher exact test). BKV VP1 mRNA copy number in urines processed using the WCHP discriminated patients with BKVN (n = 7) from patients without TCMR or BKVN (n = 29) and the AUROC was 1.0 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.00) (P < 0.0001) and BKVN was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 42 to 99) at a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 85 to 100) with the previously validated cutpoint of 6.5 × 108 BKV-VP1 mRNA copies per microgram of RNA (P < 0.0001, Fisher exact test).

CONCLUSION

Urine processed using the WCHP predicted TCMR and BKVN in kidney allograft recipients. WCHP represents not only a significant advance toward the portability of urinary cell mRNA profiling but also improved patient management by minimizing their visits for urine collection.