A switch to Raltegravir improves antiretroviral associated hepatotoxicity in individuals co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C

Convenience, efficacy, safety, and durability of INSTI-based antiretroviral therapies: evidence from the Italian MaSTER cohort

BACKGROUND

Integrase strand transferase inhibitors (INSTI), including raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (ELV), and dolutegravir (DTG), have demonstrated better efficacy and tolerability than other combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) classes in clinical trials; however, studies of sustainability of INSTI-containing therapy in the long-term are sparse. The purpose of this study was to provide an epidemiological overview comparing the outcome performance of different INSTI-based regimens longitudinally, including the metrics of efficacy, safety, convenience, and durability among a large, nationally representative cohort of persons living with HIV in Italy.

METHODS

We selected subjects in the MaSTER cohort (an Italian multicenter, hospital-based cohort established in the mid-1990s that currently has enrolled over 24,000 PLWH) who initiated an INSTI-based regimen either when naïve or following a regimen switch. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to evaluate associations between therapy interruptions and age, sex, nationality, transmission risk group, viral suppression status, CD4 + T-cell count, diagnosis year, cART status (naïve or experienced), and hepatitis coinfection. Results were stratified by cART INSTI type.

RESULTS

There were 8173 participants who initiated an INSTI-based cART regimen in the MaSTER cohort between 2009 and 2017. The population was majority male (72.6%), of Italian nationality (88.6%), and cART-experienced (83.0%). Mean age was 49.7 (standard deviation: 13.9) years. In total, interruptions of the 1st INSTI-based treatment were recorded in 34% of cases. The most frequently cited reason for interruption among all three drug types was safety problems. In the survival analysis, past history of cART use was associated with higher hazards of interruption due to poor efficacy for all three drug types when compared to persons who were cART naïve. Non-viral suppression and CD4 + T-cell count < 200/mm3 at baseline were associated with higher hazards of interruption due to efficacy, safety, and durability reasons. Non-Italian nationality was linked to higher hazards of efficacy interruption for RAL and EVG. Age was negatively associated with interruption due to convenience and positively associated with interruption due to safety reasons. People who injects drugs (PWID) were associated with higher hazards of interruption due to convenience problems. Hepatitis coinfection was linked to higher hazards of interruption due to safety concerns for people receiving RAL.

CONCLUSION

One-third of the population experienced an interruption of any drugs included in INSTI therapy in this study. The most frequent reason for interruption was safety concerns which accounted for one-fifth of interruptions among the full study population, mainly switched to DTG. The hazard for interruption was higher for low baseline CD4 + T-cell counts, higher baseline HIV-RNA, non-Italian nationality, older age, PWID and possible co-infections with hepatitis viruses. The risk ratio was higher for past history of cART use compared to persons who were cART naive, use of regimens containing 3 drugs compared to regimens containing 2 drugs. Durability worked in favor of DTG which appeared to perform better in this cohort compared to RAL and EVG, though length of follow-up was significantly shorter for DTG. These observational results need to be confirmed in further perspective studies with longer follow-up.

Immunologic Change over 72 Weeks Following Raltegravir- Versus Efavirenz-Based Therapy in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Individuals in Vietnam

The impact of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) on immune dysregulation associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV coinfection is incompletely understood. We serially assessed monocyte activation (neopterin, sCD14, and sCD163) and T cell activation (HLA-DR, CD38) and immune exhaustion [program cell death protein 1 (PD1), TIGIT] in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals who participated in a randomized trial performed in Vietnam designed to assess the hepatotoxicity of raltegravir (RAL)- versus efavirenz (EFV)-based therapy when used as first-time ART in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. Baseline pre-ART values were compared with those from ART-naive HIV-monoinfected and HIV-seronegative individuals. Before ART, HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals had higher levels of neopterin, sCD14, and sCD163, and increased frequencies of CD38+HLA-DR+, PD1+, and TIGIT+ CD4 and CD8 T cells compared with ART-naive HIV-monoinfected or HIV-seronegative individuals (all p < .01). Most parameters did not normalize despite 72 weeks of ART. In particular sCD163 persisted at high levels. Improvement over 72 weeks in fibrosis as assessed by FibroScan® correlated with reductions in plasma sCD163 and in the frequencies of T cell activation, single PD1+, TIGIT+, and dual PD1+TIGIT+ CD8 T cells. A nonsignificant tendency toward more favorable effects on monocyte and T cell immune activation and on T cell exhaustion were seen with RAL-compared with EFV-based therapy. The initiation of ART in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals is associated with incomplete improvement in monocyte and T cell immune activation and exhaustion, which was associated with some corresponding improvement in liver fibrosis.

The Influence of Antiretroviral Therapy on Hepatitis C Virus Viral Load and Liver Fibrosis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Coinfected Patients: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The role of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for Hepatitis C viral load (HCV-VL) and liver fibrosis is poorly understood. This study aimed at evaluating the influence of ART on HCV-VL and liver fibrosis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV-coinfected patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients followed at a tertiary university hospital.

RESULTS

In total, 143 patients were included. In 61 patients, ART initiation was accompanied by an increase in HCV-VL and a decrease in HIV viral load (HIV-VL), whereas ART suspension led to a decrease in HCV-VL and an increase in HIV-VL. Among the 55 HIV-suppressed patients who switched to a raltegravir (RAL)-containing regimen, median HCV-VL levels decreased significantly, while switching to a rilpivirine-containing regimen did not yield a significant reduction.

DISCUSSION

If the -treatment of chronic hepatitis starts before ART, ART initiation should be delayed as much as possible. If ART has been started, it is advisable to wait 1 year before initiating chronic hepatitis treatment. RAL as the third agent in an ART regimen could be beneficial in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, in comparison to other antiretroviral drugs.

CONCLUSION

The start and the suspension of ART significantly interferes with HCV-VL in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance for Antiviral Therapy Against HCV Infection: Update 2016

India contributes significantly to the global burden of HCV. While the nucleoside NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir became available in the Indian market in March 2015, the other directly acting agents (DAAs), Ledipasvir and Daclatasvir, have only recently become available in the India. The introduction of these DAA in India at a relatively affordable price has led to great optimism about prospects of cure for these patients as not only will they provide higher efficacy, but combination DAAs as all-oral regimen will result in lower side effects than were seen with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin therapy. Availability of these newer DAAs has necessitated revision of INASL guidelines for the treatment of HCV published in 2015. Current considerations for the treatment of HCV in India include the poorer response of genotype 3, nonavailability of many of the DAAs recommended by other guidelines and the cost of therapy. The availability of combination DAA therapy has simplified therapy of HCV with decreased reliance of evaluation for monitoring viral kinetics or drug related side effects.

Raltegravir-based therapy in a cohort of HIV/HCV co-infected individuals

The relationship between hepatic tolerance and hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection has not been extensively studied in clinical practice. We assessed the efficacy and safety of raltegravir-based therapy in an Italian cohort of HIV/HCV co-infected patients. One hundred and forty patients with HIV/HCV co-infection initiating raltegravir from SCOLTA project (Surveillance Cohort Long-Term Toxicity Antiretrovirals) were examined. Of them, 43 were women, with mean age of 45.4±6.4years; 65 (46%) had undetectable HIV-RNA<50copies/mL and 75 (54%) HIV-RNA≥50copies/mL. According to CDC classification, 49 (35%) were in stage C. Based on Fib4 score at the time of starting raltegravir, patients were classified in class I in 41 cases, class II in 68 and in class III in 31 cases. Globally, the Fib4 score slightly decreased during 24months follow-up, from 2.2 to a value of 1.8. Hepatic adverse events of any grade were observed in 67 patients, of which only 2 cases (3%) had severe liver toxicity (grade 3-4). Only one patient had to discontinue the therapy because of adverse events. According to univariate analysis, being in CDC stage C represented a risk for the development of liver toxicity, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.27 (95% CI 1.06-4.84, P=0.033). None of the other variables considered (age, sex, years since detection of HIV and HCV-RNA detectable, years of previous HIV therapy, concomitant therapy with PI or NRTI, CD4+ cell count, Fib4, and transaminases level at baseline) resulted statistically correlated to the outcome. In conclusion, raltegravir-based regimens can be safely used in HCV infected patients; in this study, the hepatic toxicity has been found to be more frequent in patients with an advanced HIV disease (CDC stage C), independently of HIV-RNA suppression at raltegravir initiation.