Donor-derived bacterial infections in lung transplant recipients in the era of multidrug resistance

Management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli infections in adult solid organ transplant recipients: GESITRA-IC/SEIMC, CIBERINFEC, and SET recommendations update

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients continue to pose a significant threat despite advances in diagnostics and treatments. The last international consensus guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) on the management of MDR GNB in adult solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were published in 2018, underscoring the need for an update to incorporate recent advances, particularly the availability of new drugs that may improve the current standard of care. A working group consisting of members from the Study Group of Infection in Transplantation and Immunocompromised Hosts (GESITRA-IC) of SEIMC, the Center for Biomedical Research Network in Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC) and the Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET) developed consensus-based recommendations for managing MDR GNB infections during the transplant procedure. Recommendations were categorized based on evidence quality and strength, utilizing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The final recommendations were endorsed through a consensus meeting and approved by the expert panel.

Pulmonary bacterial infection after lung transplantation: risk factors and impact on short-term mortality

OBJECTIVE

To explore the risk factors for pulmonary bacterial infection (PBI) after lung transplantation (LTX) and to evaluate the impact of PBI on short-term postoperative mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data on 549 recipients who underwent LTX at the Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, China, between January 2018 and December 2021. The risk factors for PBI after LTX were explored by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of one-, two-, and three-year mortality. Subgroup analysis was performed by the time of postoperative PBI (≤7 days or 8-30 day after surgery).

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative PBI in 549 recipients was 82.70% (454/549). Preoperative history of infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria (OR 12.34, 95% CI 1.69-1572.39), Acinetobacter baumannii infection in donor (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.26-9.66), and longer cold ischemia time (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.32) were risk factors for postoperative PBI. Postoperative PBI was associated with one-year (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09-2.96), two-year (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.20-3.04), and three-year mortality (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.29-3.19). Subgroup analysis showed that PBI within 7 days after surgery was associated with one-year (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.12-3.08), two-year (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.25-3.17), and three-year mortality (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.35-3.36), while PBI at 8-30 days after surgery was not associated with short-term mortality (one-year: HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.69-2.69; two-year: HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.80-2.76; three-year: HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.82-2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-recipient and surgical factors are risk factors for PBI after LTX. Active prevention and treatment of PBI within the first 7 days after surgery may improve short-term survival.

Non-Standard Risk Donors and Risk of Donor-Derived Infections: From Evaluation to Therapeutic Management

Expected and unexpected donor-derived infections are a rare complication of solid organ transplantation, but can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Over the last years, the growing gap existing between patients on the waiting list and available organs has favored the use of organs from donors with suspected or confirmed infections, thanks to the improvement of risk mitigation strategies against transmission of well recognized and emerging infections. Given the recent developments, the particular interest of this review is to summarize data on how to maximize utilization of HIV+ donors in HIV+ recipients, the use of HCV-viremic donors and HBV positive donors. This article also covers the implications for recipient of organs from donors with bacteremia and the challenge of multidrug resistant (MDR) infections. Lastly this review describes emerging risks associated with recent Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemics.

The impact of colonization by multidrug resistant bacteria on graft survival, risk of infection, and mortality in recipients of solid organ transplant: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Global increase in colonization by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria poses a significant concern. The precise impact of MDR colonization in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) remains not well established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of MDR colonization on SOTR's mortality, infection, or graft loss.

METHODS AND DATA SOURCES

Data from PROSPERO, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, Wiley Cochrane Library, ProQuest Dissertations, Theses Global, and SCOPUS were systematically reviewed, spanning from inception until 20 March 2023. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022290011) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Cohorts and case-control studies that reported on adult SOTR colonized by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. (CRE), or MDR-pseudomonas, and compared to noncolonized, were included. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, conducted a risk of bias evaluation using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and rated certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

We employed RevMan for a meta-analysis, using random-effects models to compute pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was determined using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

15,202 SOTR (33 cohort, six case-control studies) were included, where liver transplant and VRE colonization (25 and 14 studies) were predominant. MDR colonization significantly increased posttransplant 1-year mortality (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.63-3.38) and mixed infections (OR, 10.74; 95% CI, 7.56-12.26) across transplant types (p < 0.001 and I2 = 58%), but no detected impact on graft loss (p 0.41, I2 = 0). Subgroup analysis indicated a higher association between CRE or ESBL colonization with outcomes (CRE: death OR, 3.94; mixed infections OR, 24.8; ESBL: mixed infections OR, 10.3; no mortality data) compared to MRSA (Death: OR, 2.25; mixed infection: OR, 7.75) or VRE colonization (Death: p 0.20, mixed infections: OR, 5.71).

CONCLUSIONS

MDR colonization in SOTR, particularly CRE, is associated with increased mortality. Despite the low certainty of the evidence, actions to prevent MDR colonization in transplant candidates are warranted.

Lung donor bronchoalveolar lavage positivity: Incidence, risk factors, and lung transplant recipients' outcome

BACKGROUND

Inconsistent data exists regarding the risk factors for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) positivity in lung donors, the incidence of donor-derived infections (DDI), and the effect of BAL positivity on lung transplant (LuTx) recipients' outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive LuTx at a single center from January 2016 to December 2022. Donors' data, including characteristics, graft function and BAL samples were collected pre-procurement. Recipients underwent BAL before LuTx and about the 3rd, 7th and 14th day after LuTx. A DDI was defined as BAL positivity (bacterial growth ≥104 colony forming units) for identical bacterial species between donor and recipient. Recipients' pre-operative characteristics, intra-operative management, and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Two recipient cohorts were identified based on lung colonization status before undergoing LuTx.

RESULTS

Out of 188 LuTx procedures performed, 169 were analyzed. Thirty-six percent of donors' BAL tested positive. Donors' characteristics and graft function at procurement were not associated with BAL positivity. Fourteen DDI were detected accounting for 23% of recipients receiving a graft with a positive BAL. Only among uncolonized recipients, receiving a graft with positive BAL is associated with higher likelihood of requiring invasive ventilation at 72 hours after LuTx on higher positive end-expiratory pressure levels having lower PaO2/FiO2, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and longer ICU stay. No difference in hospital length of stay was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving a graft with a positive BAL, which is poorly predicted by donors' characteristics, carries the risk of developing a DDI and is associated to a worse early graft function among uncolonized recipients.

Ex vivo lung perfusion and the Organ Care System: a review

With the increasing prevalence of heart failure and end-stage lung disease, there is a sustained interest in expanding the donor pool to alleviate the thoracic organ shortage crisis. Efforts to extend the standard donor criteria and to include donation after circulatory death have been made to increase the availability of suitable organs. Studies have demonstrated that outcomes with extended-criteria donors are comparable to those with standard-criteria donors. Another promising approach to augment the donor pool is the improvement of organ preservation techniques. Both ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) for the lungs and the Organ Care System (OCS, TransMedics) for the heart have shown encouraging results in preserving organs and extending ischemia time through the application of normothermic regional perfusion. EVLP has been effective in improving marginal or borderline lungs by preserving and reconditioning them. The use of OCS is associated with excellent short-term outcomes for cardiac allografts and has improved utilization rates of hearts from extended-criteria donors. While both EVLP and OCS have successfully transitioned from research to clinical practice, the costs associated with commercially available systems and consumables must be considered. The ex vivo perfusion platform, which includes both EVLP and OCS, holds the potential for diverse and innovative therapies, thereby transforming the landscape of thoracic organ transplantation.

Tobramycin Systemic Absorption in Lung Transplant Recipients Treated With Inhaled Tobramycin: A Cohort Study

Inhaled tobramycin treatment has been associated with nephrotoxicity in some case reports, but limited data are available about serum levels and its possible systemic absorption in lung transplant recipients (LTR). We conducted a single-center, observational and retrospective study of all adult (>18 years old) LTR treated with inhaled tobramycin for at least 3 days between June 2019 and February 2022. Trough serum levels were collected and >2 μg/mL was considered a high drug level. The primary outcome assessed the presence of detectable trough levels, while the secondary outcome focused on the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in individuals with detectable trough levels. Thirty-four patients, with a median age of 60 years, were enrolled. The primary indications for treatment were donor bronchial aspirate bacterial isolation (18 patients) and tracheobronchitis (15 patients). In total, 28 patients (82%) exhibited detectable serum levels, with 9 (26%) presenting high levels (>2 μg/mL). Furthermore, 9 patients (26%) developed acute kidney injury during the treatment course. Median trough tobramycin levels were significantly elevated in invasively mechanically ventilated patients compared to non-ventilated individuals (2.5 μg/mL vs. 0.48 μg/mL) (p < 0.001). Inhaled tobramycin administration in LTRs, particularly in those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, may result in substantial systemic absorption.

Donor respiratory multidrug-resistant bacteria and lung transplantation outcomes

RATIONALE

Respiratory culture screening is mandatory for all potential lung transplant donors. There is limited evidence on the significance of donor multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria on transplant outcomes. Establishing the safety of allografts colonized with MDR bacteria has implications for widening an already limited donor pool.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the prevalence of respiratory MDR bacteria among our donor population and to test for associations with posttransplant outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included all adult patients who underwent lung-only transplantation for the first time at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre in Riyadh from January 2015 through May 2022. The study evaluated donor bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial swab cultures.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-seven of 181 donors (37%) had respiratory MDR bacteria, most commonly MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 24), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 18), MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 8), MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 7), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 6). Donor respiratory MDR bacteria were not significantly associated with allograft survival or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in adjusted hazard models. Sensitivity analyses revealed an increased risk for 90-day mortality among recipients of allografts with MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 6 with strains resistant to a carbapenem and n = 2 resistant to a third-generation cephalosporin only) compared to those receiving culture-negative allografts (25.0% versus 11.1%, p = 0.04). MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (aHR 3.31, 95%CI 0.95-11.56) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (aHR 5.35, 95%CI 1.26-22.77) were associated with an increased risk for CLAD compared to negative cultures.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest the potential safety of using lung allografts with MDR bacteria in the setting of appropriate prophylaxis; however, caution should be exercised in the case of MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Approach to suspected donor-derived infections

Prevention of donor-derived disease among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients requires judicious risk-benefit assessment. Comprehensive guidelines outline specific donor risk factors and post-transplant monitoring strategies to prevent and mitigate transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. However, elimination of unanticipated donor-derived infections remains challenging. The objectives of this review are to (1) define risk of anticipated vs. unanticipated disease transmission events in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients; (2) discuss donor presentations that confer greater risk of unanticipated disease transmission; (3) develop a matrix for consideration of donor acceptance; and (4) discuss limitations and future directions for donor screening. Although solid organ transplant confers inherent risk of infection transmission, the risk of significant disease transmission events may be mitigated by a comprehensive approach including donor assessment, consideration of recipient need, post-transplant monitoring, and early intervention.

Etiologic characteristics revealed by mNGS-mediated ultra-early and early microbiological identification in airway secretions from lung transplant recipients

Background

Post-operative etiological studies are critical for infection prevention in lung transplant recipients within the first year. In this study, mNGS combined with microbial culture was applied to reveal the etiological characteristics within one week (ultra-early) and one month (early) in lung transplant recipients, and the epidemiology of infection occurred within one month.

Methods

In 38 lung transplant recipients, deep airway secretions were collected through bronchofiberscope within two hours after the operation and were subjected to microbial identification by mNGS and microbial culture. The etiologic characteristics of lung transplant recipients were explored. Within one month, the infection status of recipients was monitored. The microbial species detected by mNGS were compared with the etiological agents causing infection within one month.

Results

The detection rate of mNGS in the 38 airway secretions specimens was significantly higher than that of the microbial culture (P<0.0001). MNGS identified 143 kinds of pathogenic microorganisms; bacterial pathogens account for more than half (72.73%), with gram-positive and -negative bacteria occupying large proportions. Fungi such as Candida are also frequently detected. 5 (50%) microbial species identified by microbial culture had multiple drug resistance (MDR). Within one month, 26 (68.42%) recipients got infected (with a median time of 9 days), among which 10 (38.46%) cases were infected within one week. In the infected recipients, causative agents were detected in advance by mNGS in 9 (34.62%) cases, and most of them (6, 66.67%) were infected within one week (ultra-early). In the infection that occurred after one week, the consistency between mNGS results and the etiological agents was decreased.

Conclusion

Based on the mNGS-reported pathogens in airway secretions samples collected within two hours, the initial empirical anti-infection regimes covering the bacteria and fungi are reasonable. The existence of bacteria with MDR forecasts the high risk of infection within 48 hours after transplant, reminding us of the necessity to adjust the antimicrobial strategy. The predictive role of mNGS performed within two hours in etiological agents is time-limited, suggesting continuous pathogenic identification is needed after lung transplant.

Epidemiology and Long-Term Outcomes in Thoracic Transplantation

Over the past five decades, outcomes for lung transplantation have significantly improved in the early post-operative period, such that lung transplant is now the gold standard treatment for end-stage respiratory disease. The major limitation that impacts lung transplant survival rates is the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD affects around 50% of lung transplant recipients within five years of transplantation. We must also consider other factors impacting the survival rate such as the surgical technique (single versus double lung transplant), along with donor and recipient characteristics. The future is promising, with more research looking into ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and bioengineered lungs, with the hope of increasing the donor pool and decreasing the risk of graft rejection.

The utilization of nanopore targeted sequencing proves to be advantageous in the identification of infections present in deceased donors

Background

Nanopore Target Sequencing (NTS) represents a novel iteration of gene sequencing technology; however, its potential utility in the detection of infection in deceased donors has yet to be documented. The present study endeavors to assess the applicability of NTS in this domain.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised a cohort of 71 patients who were under intensive care at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University between June 2020 and January 2022. The specimens were subjected to microbiological tests utilizing NTS, culture, and other techniques, and subsequently, the diagnostic accuracy of NTS was compared with conventional methods.

Results

Blood NTS exhibited a better agreement rate of 52.11% and a greater positive rate of pathogen detection than blood culture (50.70% vs. 5.63%, p < 0.001). In NTS of deceased donors, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter baumannii were the most frequently found bacteria, and Candida was the most frequently found fungus. Blood NTS had a considerably better sensitivity for detecting clinical bloodstream infection than blood culture (62.50%: 7.14%, p < 0.001). These findings were supported by comparisons between blood NTS and conventional microbial detection methods (such as blood culture, glucan testing, galactomannan testing, T cell spot testing for tuberculosis infection, smear, etc.).

Conclusion

The pathogen detection technology NTS has a high sensitivity and positive rate. It can more accurately and earlier detect infection in deceased donors, which could be very important for raising the donation conversion rate.

Biofire pneumonia panel in lung donors: faster detection but limited pathogens

BACKGROUND

Culture of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens takes time to report. We tested whether a molecular diagnostic test could accelerate donor lung assessment and treatment.

METHODS

We compared BioFire Film Array Pneumonia Panel (BFPP) with standard of care (SOC) tests on lung allograft samples at three time points: (1) donor BAL at organ recovery, (2) donor bronchial tissue and airway swab at implantation, and (3) first recipient BAL following lung implantation. Primary outcomes were the difference in time to result (Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests) and the agreement in results between BFPP and SOC assays (Gwet's agreement coefficient).

RESULTS

We enrolled 50 subjects. In donor lung BAL specimens, BFPP detected 52 infections (14 out of 26 pathogens in the panel). Viral and bacterial BFPP results were reported 2.4 h (interquartile range, IQR 2.0-6.4) following BAL versus 4.6 h (IQR 1.9-6.0, p = 0.625) for OPO BAL viral SOC results and 66 h (IQR 47-87, p < .0001) for OPO BAL bacterial SOC results. Although there was high overall agreement of results between BAL-BFPP versus OPO BAL-SOC tests (Gwet's AC p < .001 for all), the level of agreement differed among 26 pathogens designed in BFPP and differed by types of specimens. BFPP could not detect many infections identified by SOC assays.

CONCLUSIONS

BFPP decreased time to detection of lung pathogens among donated lungs, but it cannot replace SOC tests due to the limited number of pathogens in the panel.

Multidrug-resistant organisms in lung transplant: a narrative review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this narrative review is presenting the current knowledge of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in lung transplant recipients, considering both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overall prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens has increased remarkably (4.33/1000 recipient-days) in solid organ transplant recipients, while the prevalence of Gram-positive bacteria seems to be decreasing (0.20 cases/100 transplant-years). In lung transplant, the prevalence of postoperative infections due to MDR-GN bacteria has been assessed between 31 and 57%, and the incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales is between 0.4 and 20%, with a related mortality up to 70%. MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa is common in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis and may contribute to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. The prevalence of MDR Gram-positive bacteria is around 30% (predominantly Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative staphylococcus).

SUMMARY

Survival after lung transplant, although lower than in other SOT, is increasing and currently at 60% at 5 years. This review highlights the potential clinical and social burden of postoperative infections in lung transplant recipients, and confirmed that a PI due to MDR bacteria negatively affects survival. A prompt diagnosis, prevention and management of these MDR pathogens should remain the cornerstone for higher goals of care.

Trends and Outcomes in Lung Transplantation in Patients with and without Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Spain during the Period 2016-2020

(1) Background: This paper aims to assess temporal trends (2016-2020) in incidence, patient's characteristics, complications, length of hospital stay (LOHS) and in-hospital mortality (IHM) among patients with and without idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) undergoing lung transplantation (LTx). We also analyse the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on LTx in these populations. (2) Methods: A retrospective, population-based observational study was conducted using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database. Multivariable adjustment was conducted with logistic regression to analyse the IHM. (3) Results: We identified 1777 admissions for LTx during the study period, of which 573 (32.2%) were performed in patients with IPF. The number of hospital admissions for LTx rose from 2016 to 2020, both in patients with and without IPF, but a marked reduction was observed from year 2019 to year 2020. Over time, the proportion of single LTx decreased and bilateral LTx increased significantly in both groups. The incidence of LTx complications increased significantly over time along with the increase in the incidence of IPF. No significant differences in the incidence of complications or in the IHM between patients with and without IPF were found. Suffering any complication of the LTx and pulmonary hypertension were conditions positively associated with IHM in patients with and without IPF. The IHM remained stable from 2016 to 2020 in both study populations and was not affected by the COVID pandemic. (4) Conclusions: Patients with IPF account for almost a third of all lung transplants. The number of LTx increased over time in patients with and without IPF, but a marked reduction was observed from 2019 to 2020. Although the proportion of LTx complications increased significantly over time in both groups, the IHM did not change. IPF was not associated with increased complications or IHM after LTx.

Evaluation of donor-derived bacterial infections in lung transplant recipients

Background

This study aims to evaluate the etiology and outcomes of donor-derived bacterial infections in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Methods

Between January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 71 lung transplant recipients (56 males, 15 females; median age: 43.3 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis of donor-derived bacterial infection was defined as the isolation of the same bacteria with the same antibiotic susceptibility patterns in a lung sample of donor and in one sample obtained from patients after transplantation and the presence of clinical evidence of infection.

Results

Ten (14%) patients were found to have donor-derived bacterial infection. Acinetobacter baumannii was found in three, Pseudomonas aeruginosa in three, Klebsiella pneumoniae in one, Enterobacter cloacae in one, Staphylococcus aureus in one, and both Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii in one patient. Twenty-four of lung-transplant recipients and four patients with donor-derived infection died.

Conclusion

Lung transplants are usually performed in hospitalized patients or in those admitted to the intensive care unit. These patients commonly experience infection and colonization with resistant microorganisms.

Analysis of Donor to Recipient Pathogen Transmission in Relation to Cold Ischemic Time and Other Selected Aspects of Lung Transplantation-Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Infections are one of the leading causes of death in the early postoperative period after lung transplantation (LuTx).

METHODS

We analyzed 59 transplantations and culture results of the donor bronchial aspirates (DBA), graft endobronchial swabs (GES), and recipient cultures (RC) before and after the procedure (RBA). We correlated the results with a cold ischemic time (CIT), recipient intubation time, and length of stay in the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), among others.

RESULTS

CIT of the first and second lungs were 403 and 541 min, respectively. Forty-two and eighty-three percent of cultures were positive in DBA and GES, respectively. Furthermore, positive results were obtained in 79.7% of RC and in 33.9% of RBA. Longer donor hospitalization was correlated with Gram-negative bacteria isolation in DBA. Longer CIT was associated with Gram-positive bacteria other than Staphylococcus aureus in GES and it resulted in longer recipient stay in the ICU. Furthermore, longer CIT resulted in the development of the new pathogens in RBA.

CONCLUSION

Results of GES brought more clinically relevant information than DBA. Donor hospitalization was associated with the occurrence of Gram-negative bacteria. Positive cultures of DBA, GES, and RBA were not associated with recipient death.

Impact of Culture-Positive Preservation Fluid on Early Morbidity and Mortality After Lung Transplantation

The prevalence, risk factors and outcomes associated with culture-positive preservation fluid (PF) after lung transplantation (LT) are unknown. From January 2015 to December 2020, the microbiologic analyses of PF used to store the cold ischaemia-placed lung graft(s) of 271 lung transplant patients were retrospectively studied. Culture-positive PF was defined as the growth of any microorganism. Eighty-three (30.6%) patients were transplanted with lung grafts stored in a culture-positive PF. One-third of culture-positive PF were polymicrobial. Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. No risk factors for culture-positive PF based on donor characteristics were identified. Forty (40/83; 48.2%) patients had postoperative pneumonia on Day 0 and 2 (2/83; 2.4%) patients had pleural empyema with at least one identical bacteria isolated in culture-positive PF. The 30-day survival rate was lower for patients with culture-positive PF compared with patients with culture-negative PF (85.5% vs. 94.7%, p = 0.01). Culture-positive PF has a high prevalence and may decrease lung transplant recipient survival. Further studies are required to confirm these results and improve understanding of the pathogenesis of culture-positive PF and their management.

Utility of deceased donor cultures in solid organ transplantation in preventing donor-derived bacterial and fungal infectious diseases transmission

Deceased donor and organ perfusion fluid cultures are obtained in order to inform recipient antimicrobial management and therefore reduce the risk of donor-derived bacterial and fungal infections. However, important heterogeneity exists in laboratory practice across organ procurement organizations and clinical management of culture results across transplant centers. While not standardized, the clinical approach to donors with positive bacterial and/or fungal cultures should be informed by the risk of donor-derived infection (DDI) and the consequence of organ non-utilization and account for potential unintended effects of antimicrobial use in the recipient. In this review, we summarize the literature on bacterial and fungal DDIs, describe the significance of positive cultures by anatomic site, and summarize current guidance on the management of positive cultures from donors or preservation fluids.

Wide-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis guarantees optimal outcomes in drowned donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Drowned victims possibly obtain various pathogens from drowning sites. Using drowned renal donors to expand the donor pool still lacks consensus due to the potential risk of disease transmission.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 38 drowned donor renal recipients in a large clinical center from August 2012 to February 2021. A 1:2 matched cohort was generated with donor demographics, including age, gender, BMI, and ICU durations. Donor microbiological results, recipient perioperative infections, and early post-transplant and first-year clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, drowned donors had significantly increased positive fungal cultures (36.84% vs.13.15%, p = 0.039). Recipients in the drowned group had significantly higher rates of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and multidrug-resistant GNB infections (23.68% vs.5.26%, 18.42% vs. 3.95%, both p < 0.05). Other colonization and infections were also numerically more frequent in the drowned group. Drowned donor recipients receiving inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis had more perioperative bloodstream infections, higher DGF incidences, and more first-year respiratory tract infections and recipient loss than those receiving adequate prophylaxis (all p < 0.05). Clinical outcomes were similar between the adequate group and the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Drowned donors could be suitable options under wide-spectrum and adequate antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can benefit from traditional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities directed to improve judicious perioperative prescribing and management, but evidence is lacking. The aim of this expert opinion review is to provide an update on the current landscape of application of AMS practices for optimization of perioperative prophylaxis (PP).

METHODS

We reviewed the available literature on early postoperative infectious complications in SOT and PP management, on modified perioperative approaches in case of infection or colonization in recipients and donors and on AMS in transplantation PP.

RESULTS

SOT recipients are at high risk for early postoperative infectious complications due to the complexity of surgical procedures, severity of end stage organ disease, net state of immunosuppression in the posttransplant period and to the high risk for multidrug resistant organism. Moreover, SOT may be exposed to preservation fluid infections and expected or unexpected donor-derived infections. We summarize main factors to take into account when prescribing transplant PP.

CONCLUSION

Creating personalized PP to avoid unwanted consequences of antimicrobials while improving outcomes is an emerging and critical aspect in SOT setting. Further studies are needed to offer best PP tailored to SOT type and to evaluate interventions efficacy and safety.

Challenges of Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship in Solid Organ Transplant Patients

Purpose of Review

Without effective antimicrobials, patients cannot undergo transplant surgery safely or sustain immunosuppressive therapy. This review examines the burden of antimicrobial resistance in solid organ transplant recipients and identifies opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship.

Recent Findings

Antimicrobial resistance has been identified to be the leading cause of death globally. Multidrug-resistant pathogens are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus affects liver and lung recipients, causing bacteremia, pneumonia, and surgical site infections. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci is a nosocomial pathogen primarily causing bacteremia in liver recipients. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens present urgent and serious threats to transplant recipients. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae commonly cause bacteremia and intra-abdominal infections in liver and kidney recipients. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, mainly K. pneumoniae, are responsible for infections early-post transplant in liver, lung, kidney, and heart recipients. P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii continue to be critical threats. While there are new antimicrobial agents targeting resistant pathogens, judicious prescribing is crucial to minimize emerging resistance. The full implications of the COVID-19 global pandemic on antimicrobial resistance in transplant recipients remain to be understood. Currently, there are no established standards on the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship interventions, but strategies that leverage existing antimicrobial stewardship program structure while tailoring to the needs of transplant recipients may help to optimize antimicrobial use.

Summary

Clinicians caring for transplant recipients face unique challenges tackling emerging antimcirobial resistance. Coordinated antimicrobial stewardship interventions in collaboration with appropriate expertise in transplant and infectious diseases may mitigate against such threats.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Review of Current and Future Application in Lung Transplantation

The number of waitlisted lung transplant candidates exceeds the availability of donor organs. Barriers to utilization of donor lungs include suboptimal lung allograft function, long ischemic times due to geographical distance between donor and recipient, and a wide array of other logistical and medical challenges. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a modality that allows donor lungs to be evaluated in a closed circuit outside of the body and extends lung donor assessment prior to final acceptance for transplantation. EVLP was first utilized successfully in 2001 in Lund, Sweden. Since its initial use, EVLP has facilitated hundreds of lung transplants that would not have otherwise happened. EVLP technology continues to evolve and improve, and currently there are multiple commercially available systems, and more under investigation worldwide. Although barriers to universal utilization of EVLP exist, the possibility for more widespread adaptation of this technology abounds. Not only does EVLP have diagnostic capabilities as an organ monitoring device but also the therapeutic potential to improve lung allograft quality when specific issues are encountered. Expanded treatment potential includes the use of immunomodulatory treatment to reduce primary graft dysfunction, as well as targeted antimicrobial therapy to treat infection. In this review, we will highlight the historical development, the current state of utilization/capability, and the future promise of this technology.

Bacterial infections in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation has lower survival rates compared to other than other solid organ transplants (SOT) due to higher rates of infection and rejection-related complications, and bacterial infections (BI) are the most frequent infectious complications. Excess morbidity and mortality are not only a direct consequence of these BI, but so are subsequent loss of allograft tolerance, rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction due to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). A wide variety of pathogens can cause infections in lung transplant recipients (LTRs), including a number of nosocomial pathogens and other multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Although pneumonia and intrathoracic infections predominate, LTRs are at risk of a number of types of infections. Risk factors include altered anatomy and function of airways, impaired immunity, the microbial flora of the donor and recipient, underlying medical conditions, and genetic factors. Further work on immune monitoring has the potential to improve outcomes. The infecting agents can be derived from the donor lung, pre-existing recipient flora, or acquired from the environment over time. Certain infections may preclude lung transplantation, but this varies from center to center, and more recent studies suggest fewer patients should be disqualified. New molecular methods allow microbiome studies of the lung, gut, and other sites that may further our knowledge of how airway colonization can result in infection and allograft loss. Surveillance, early diagnosis, and aggressive antimicrobial therapy of BI is critical in LTRs. Antibiotic resistance is a major barrier to successful management of these infections. The availability of new agents for MDR Gram-negatives may improve outcomes. Other new therapies, such as bacteriophage therapy, show promise for the future. Finally, it is important to prevent infections through peri-transplant prophylaxis, vaccination, and infection control measures.

Impact of Donor-Derived Multi-drug-Resistant Organism Infections on Abdominal Solid Organ Transplantation Recipients in China

BACKGROUND

Infection with multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is a life-threatening disease among abdominal solid organ transplantation recipients. Reports of donor-derived (DD) MDRO infections were few, but adverse clinical outcomes were severe, such as death or graft loss.

METHODS

The medical records of 68 donation after citizens' death donors with MDRO infections and 20 recipients transmitted with infections between October 1, 2015, and September 1, 2020, were reviewed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Declaration of Istanbul. There were no grafts from prisoners, and no donors were not coerced or paid.

RESULTS

Prevalence and mortality of DD-MDRO infection among abdominal solid organ transplantation recipients were 2.3% and 18.1%, respectively. The prevalence rate of DD-MDR gram-negative bacterial infection was higher than that of gram-positive bacterial infection (1.7% vs 0.6%). Negative culture of specimens occurred in 9 of 68 donors. Recipients with DD-MDR gram-negative bacterial infections had a significantly lower survival rate compared with DD-MDR gram-positive bacterial infections (P = .046).

CONCLUSIONS

Donation after citizens' death donors and recipients had high MDRO infection rates, and gram-negative bacteria were the predominant pathogens. When a possible DD-MDRO infection occurs, there may be adverse outcomes with limited choice of antibiotics. A nationwide surveillance and communication network needs to be established in China.

Cefiderocol-Based Combination Therapy for "Difficult-to-Treat" Gram-Negative Severe Infections: Real-Life Case Series and Future Perspectives

Cefiderocol is a new cephalosporin displaying against extensively resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria. We report our experience with cefiderocol-based combination therapies as “rescue” treatments in immunocompromised or critically ill patients or in patients with post-surgical infections who had failed previous regimens. A total of 13 patients were treated from 1 September 2020 to 31 March 2021. In total, 5/13 (38%) patients were classified as critically ill, due to severe COVID-19 lung failure; 4/13 (31%) patients had post-surgical infections and 4/13 (31%) had severe infections in immunocompromised subjects due to solid organ transplantation (2/4) or hematological malignancy (2/4). Overall, 10/13 infections were caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, one by KPC-positive ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia and two by Pseudomonas aeruginosa XDR. Based on clinical, microbiological and hematobiochemical evaluation, cefiderocol was associated with different companion drugs, particularly with fosfomycin, high-dose tigecycline and/or colistin. Microbiological eradication was achieved in all cases and the 30-day survival rate was 10/13; two patients died due to SARS-CoV-2 lung failure, whereas one death was attributed to subsequent infections. No recurrent infections within 30 days were reported. Finally, we hereby discuss the therapeutic potential of cefiderocol and the possible place in the therapy of this novel drug.

Cryo-EM as a tool to study bacterial efflux systems and the membrane proteome

Antibiotic resistance is an emerging threat to global health. Current treatment regimens for these types of bacterial infections are becoming increasingly inadequate. Thus, new innovative technologies are needed to help identify and characterize novel drugs and drug targets which are critical in order to combat multidrug-resistant bacterial strains. Bacterial efflux systems have emerged as an attractive target for drug design, as blocking their export function significantly increases the potency of administered antibiotics. However, in order to develop potent and tolerable efflux pump inhibitors with high efficacy, detailed structural information is required for both the apo- and substrate-bound forms of these membrane proteins. The emergence of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has greatly advanced the field of membrane protein structural biology. It has significantly enhanced the ability to solve large multi-protein complexes as well as extract meaningful data from a heterogeneous sample, such as identification of several assembly states of the bacterial ribosome, from a single data set. This technique can be expanded to solve the structures of substrate-bound efflux pumps and entire efflux systems from previously unusable membrane protein sample preparations. Subsequently, cryo-EM combined with other biophysical techniques has the potential to markedly advance the field of membrane protein structural biology. The ability to discern complete transport machineries, enzymatic signal transduction pathways, and other membrane-associated complexes will help us fully understand the complexities of the membrane proteome.

Multidrug-resistant bacteria in lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review of infections in lung transplantation is beyond the scope of this article as it is a comprehensive topic, however we aim to focus on infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms in this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

New emerging clinical studies have provided data regarding outcomes in lung transplant recipients with MDR bacterial infections.

SUMMARY

Isolation of MDR bacteria from lung donors preoperatively has not been associated with worse outcomes in recipients. Patients with cystic fibrosis colonized with MDR bacteria do not have increased 1 year mortality rates compared to those without MDR bacteria.

Effectiveness of short vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant recipients with donor positive respiratory cultures

Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for infection in the early postoperative phase, thus perioperative antibiotics are employed. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of short- vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant patients. Lung transplant patients with donor positive cultures between August 2013 and September 2019 were evaluated, excluding those with cystic fibrosis, death within 14 days and re-transplants. The primary outcome was 30-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection. A total of 147 patients were included (57 short vs 90 long-course). Median perioperative antibiotic duration was 6 days in the short-course vs 14 days in the long-course group (P < .0001). Thirty-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection was present in 56 (98%) patients in the short-course vs 85 (94%) patients in the long-course group (P = .41). There was no difference in development of Clostridioides difficile infections (P = .41), while cumulative ventilator time and time to post-op extubation were longer in the long-course group (P = .001 and .004, respectively). Among lung transplant recipients with positive donor respiratory cultures, short-course perioperative antibiotics were as effective as long-course antibiotics in preventing donor-derived bacterial respiratory infections.

Worldwide clinical practices in perioperative antibiotic therapy for lung transplantation

Background

Infection is the most common cause of mortality within the first year after lung transplantation (LTx). The management of perioperative antibiotic therapy is a major issue, but little is known about worldwide practices.

Methods

We sent by email a survey dealing with 5 daily clinical vignettes concerning perioperative antibiotic therapy to 180 LTx centers around the world. The invitation and a weekly reminder were sent to lung transplant specialists for a single consensus answer per center during a 3-month period.

Results

We received a total of 99 responses from 24 countries, mostly from Western Europe (n = 46) and the USA (n = 34). Systematic screening for bronchial recipient colonization before LTx was mostly performed with sputum samples (72%), regardless of the underlying lung disease. In recipients without colonization, antibiotics with activity against gram-negative bacteria resistant strains (piperacillin / tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, carbapenems) were reported in 72% of the centers, and antibiotics with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (mainly vancomycin) were reported in 38% of the centers. For these recipients, the duration of antibiotics reported was 7 days (33%) or less (26%) or stopped when cultures of donor and recipients were reported negatives (12%). In recipients with previous colonization, antibiotics were adapted to the susceptibility of the most resistant strain and given for at least 14 days (67%).

Conclusion

Practices vary widely around the world, but resistant bacterial strains are mostly targeted even if no colonization occurs. The antibiotic duration reported was longer for colonized recipients.