Clinical and biochemical characteristics and outcomes of suspected COVID-19 hospitalized patients: RT-PCR swab positive and negative comparison

Unveiling coagulation dysfunction in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective analysis

Coagulation dysfunction has emerged as a significant aspect of COVID-19 pathophysiology, with abnormal coagulation parameters observed in severe cases. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of coagulation parameters, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and international normalized ratio (INR) for mortality in patients with COVID-19. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Coagulation parameters, including PT, PTT, and INR, were measured upon admission. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive performance of these parameters. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and the area under the curve (AUC) values were determined. The analysis included 156 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The t-test revealed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in PTT, PT, and INR. PTT demonstrated the highest predictive performance, with an AUC value of 0.68, indicating superior discrimination compared with PT and INR. PTT exhibited a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 46% for identifying deceased patients. These findings suggest that PTT may serve as a valuable prognostic marker of mortality risk in patients with COVID-19. Coagulation indicators, particularly PTT, predicted COVID-19 mortality. Monitoring coagulation markers may help stratify the risk and guide treatment. Further research and validation studies are needed to corroborate these findings and to establish the clinical importance of coagulation markers in COVID-19 therapy. COVID-19 coagulation dysfunction mechanisms must be understood in order to design targeted therapies to reduce thrombotic consequences.

Retrospective Evaluation of Hematological Parameters in COVID-19 Patients: Insights From the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study evaluated hematological parameters in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients to gain clinical insights.

METHODS

Data from the Emergency Department of Samtah General Hospital, Samtah, Saudi Arabia, were analyzed, focusing on the parameters measured during hospital admission. This study was conducted between April 2020 and October 2021. Associations between hematological parameters and COVID-19 outcomes were examined in 153 participants, including 23 deceased individuals.

RESULTS

The chi-square test results indicated no significant associations (P >0.05) between sex, body mass index (BMI), age, and disease outcome in the study population. However, a significant association was observed between neutrophil percentage and disease outcome, whereas no significant associations were found for red blood cell count, hemoglobin level, monocyte percentage, eosinophil percentage, and basophil percentage. Cox regression analysis revealed a significant association between neutrophil count (considered a categorical covariate) and survival outcomes (P = 0.030). However, specific neutrophil categories (50-70 and >70) were not significantly associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating hematological parameters into COVID-19 clinical guidelines and decision-support tools holds promise for enhancing patient care and outcomes.

Association between inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, clinical laboratory parameters, disease severity and in-hospital mortality in critical and mild COVID-19 patients without comorbidities or immune-mediated diseases

There are limited data on inflammatory cytokines and chemokines; the humoral immune response; and main clinical laboratory parameters as indicators for disease severity and mortality in patients with critical and mild COVID-19 without comorbidities or immune-mediated diseases in Saudi Arabia. We determined the expression levels of major proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines; C-reactive protein (CRP); procalcitonin; SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody and twenty-two clinical laboratory parameters and assessed their usefulness as indicators of disease severity and in-hospital death. Our results showed a significant increase in the expression levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody; IL1-β; IL-6; IL-8; TNF-α and CRP in critical COVID-19 patients; neutrophil count; urea; creatinine and troponin were also increased. The elevation of these biomarkers was significantly associated and positively correlated with in-hospital death in critical COVID-19 patients. Our results suggest that the levels of IL1-β; IL-6; IL-8; TNF-α; and CRP; neutrophil count; urea; creatinine; and troponin could be used to predict disease severity in COVID-19 patients without comorbidities or immune-mediated diseases. These inflammatory mediators could be used as predictive early biomarkers of COVID-19 disease deterioration; shock and death among COVID-19 patients without comorbidities or immune-mediated diseases.

Electrochemical paper-based antigen sensing platform using plant-derived monoclonal antibody for detecting SARS-CoV-2

The current approaches of diagnostic platforms for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections mostly relied on adapting the existing technology. In this work, a simple and low-cost electrochemical sensing platform for detecting SAR-CoV-2 antigen was established. The proposed sensor combined the innovative disposable paper-based immunosensor and cost-effective plant-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody CR3022, expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana. The cellulose nanocrystal was modified on screen-printed graphene electrode to provide the abundant COOH functional groups on electrode surface, leading to the high ability for antibody immobilization. The quantification of the presence receptor binding domain (RBD) spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 was performed using differential pulse voltammetry by monitoring the changing current of [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- redox solution. The current change of [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- before and after the presence of target RBD could be clearly distinguished, providing a linear relationship with RBD concentration in the range from 0.1 pg/mL to 500 ng/mL with the minimum limit of detection of 2.0 fg/mL. The proposed platform was successfully applied to detect RBD in nasopharyngeal swab samples with satisfactory results. Furthermore, the paper-based immunosensor was extended to quantify the RBD level in spiked saliva samples, demonstrating the broadly applicability of this system. This electrochemical paper-based immunosensor has the potential to be employed as a point-of-care testing for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of people experiencing post-coronavirus disease 2019-related symptoms: A prospective follow-up investigation

Background

Post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome, also known as long COVID, is a prolonged illness after the acute phase of COVID-19. Hospitalized patients were known to have persisting symptoms of fatigue, headache, dyspnea, and anosmia. There is a need to describe the characteristics of individuals with post-COVID-19 symptoms in comparison to the baseline characteristics.

Purpose

To investigate the clinical and biochemical characteristics of people who recovered from COVID-19 after 6 months of discharge from the hospital.

Methods

This was a prospective follow-up investigation of hospitalized and discharged COVID-19 patients. Adult patients admitted to King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and discharged were recruited. The baseline demographic information, comorbidities, vital signs and symptoms, laboratory parameters, COVID-19 therapy, and outcomes were collected from the medical records. Blood samples were collected for cytokines estimation. A detailed interview about signs and symptoms was undertaken during the follow-up.

Results

Half of the followed-up people reported experiencing at least one of the COVID-19-related symptoms. The mean blood pressure was found higher in follow-up. People with the symptoms were characterized by low lymphocyte count, lower serum calcium levels, and hyperglycemia compared to people without any post-COVID-19 symptoms. Cytokines IL-8, VEGF, and MCP-1 were higher in people with the most frequent symptoms.

Conclusion

People with post-COVID-19 symptoms were characterized by lower lymphocyte count, lower serum calcium levels, and hyperglycemia compared to people without symptoms. Individuals with the most frequent post-COVID-19 symptoms had higher baseline pro-inflammatory, chemotactic, and angiogenic cytokines.

Admission Hyperglycemia as a Predictor of COVID-19 Pneumonia, Cytokine Release Syndrome Progression, and Clinical Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Introduction Diabetes and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are interrelated. The presence of hyperglycemia per se during COVID-19 infection regardless of diabetes status has been associated with poor prognosis and increased risk of mortality. Objectives The main aim of the current study was to assess the association between admission hyperglycemia and COVID-19 outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study including 315 patients, mainly employed in the facility, who presented to the emergency department or were admitted with confirmed COVID-19 infection from April 2020 to August 2021. Results The mean age of the studied cohort was 40.2±12.5 years, where 59.68% were males and 37.7% were symptomatic. Older age, male gender, history of diabetes and hypertension, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were associated with a significantly increased risk of developing cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Admission hyperglycemia was significantly associated with poor outcomes. The time to negativity was 9.30±0.1 days for asymptomatic patients; however, it increased significantly according to clinical presentation, presence of comorbidities, and severe outcomes, in patients with cytokine release syndrome. Conclusions Admission hyperglycemia was associated with an increased risk of progression to critical condition in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 independent of the history of diabetes. Therefore, it should not be overlooked but instead should be detected and appropriately treated to improve outcomes. In addition, post-COVID-19 care should be individualized, where severe cases require almost double the time needed by mild cases to convert to negative.

The broad spectrum of COVID-like patients initially negative at RT-PCR testing: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients that arrive in the emergency department (ED) with COVID-19-like syndromes testing negative at the first RT-PCR represent a clinical challenge because of the lack of evidence about their management available in the literature. Our first aim was to quantify the proportion of patients testing negative at the first RT-PCR performed in our Emergency Department (ED) that were confirmed as having COVID-19 at the end of hospitalization by clinical judgment or by any subsequent microbiological testing. Secondly, we wanted to identify which variables that were available in the first assessment (ED variables) would have been useful in predicting patients, who at the end of the hospital stay were confirmed as having COVID-19 (false-negative at the first RT-PCR).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of 115 negative patients from2020, March 1st to 2020, May 15th. Three experts revised patients' charts collecting information on the whole hospital stay and defining patients as COVID-19 or NOT-COVID-19. We compared ED variables in the two groups by univariate analysis and logistic regression.

RESULTS

We classified 66 patients as COVID-19 and identified the other 49 as having a differential diagnosis (NOT-COVID), with a concordance between the three experts of 0.77 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.66- 0.73). Only 15% of patients tested positive to a subsequent RT-PCR test, accounting for 25% of the clinically suspected. Having fever (odds ratio (OR) 3.32, (95%CI 0.97-12.31), p = 0.06), showing a typical pattern at the first lung ultrasound (OR 6.09, (95%CI 0.87-54.65), p = 0.08) or computed tomography scan (OR 4.18, (95%CI 1.11-17.86), p = 0.04) were associated with a higher probability of having COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients admitted to ED with COVID-19 symptoms and negative RT-PCR a comprehensive clinical evaluation integrated with lung ultrasound and computed tomography could help to detect COVID-19 patients with a false negative RT-PCR result.