Early administration of tolvaptan preserves renal function in elderly patients with acute decompensated heart failure

Randomized trial to assess worsening renal function by adding dapagliflozin for acute decompensated heart failure

AIMS

Dapagliflozin (DAPA), a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, has been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality among patients with chronic heart failure. We aimed to evaluate the impact on a worsening renal function (WRF) by adding DAPA as compared to standard decongestive therapy with loop diuretics alone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 114 consecutive acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 50%. The patients were prospectively randomized to be assigned either to DAPA group who received DAPA at a dose of 10 mg once daily within 24 h after admission or conventional therapy group (CON group) who received loop diuretics alone. All patients were adjusted by increasing or decreasing the loop diuretic by 10 mg to maintain a 1-2 mL/kg/h urine output. The primary endpoint was the incidence of WRF, which was defined as an increase in the serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL from baseline. The median age of the patients was 77 [interquartile range (IQR): 64, 85] years, 35% were female and the median LVEF was 33 [IQR: 28, 38] %. There was no significant difference in the incidence of WRF between the two groups (16.1%, n = 9 vs. 12.1%, n = 7, P value = 0.54). The total dose of loop diuretics through day 7 was lower in the DAPA group than CON group (184 ± 79.5 mg vs. 214 ± 66.5 mg, P value = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized prospective trial revealed the addition of DAPA within 24 h after admission reduced the diuretic dose without WRF.

Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tolvaptan in patients with heart failure and renal impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with heart failure and concomitant renal impairment are often prescribed loop diuretics, such as furosemide, as the primary treatment. The present meta-analysis is focused on analyzing the safety and efficacy of the implementation of tolvaptan as a novel approach in patients with renal impairment and heart failure.

METHODS

Two reviewers conducted a screening of articles using online databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Following a comprehensive literature search, seven articles that met all inclusion criteria (patients with heart failure and renal impairment) were selected for analysis. Subsequently, various primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The primary outcomes of our study included urine volume, worsening renal function, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, and creatinine levels. Tolvaptan demonstrated superior efficacy in increasing urine output with a standardized mean difference of 2.18 (95% CI 0.62-3.75, p = 0.006) and resulted in a lower incidence of worsening renal function with odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.22-0.77, p = 0.006). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the tolvaptan and conventional treatment groups in changing serum creatinine levels with a standardized mean difference of - 0.37 (95% CI - 0.86 to 0.12, p = 0.135), but tolvaptan tends to decrease blood urea nitrogen levels with a standardized mean difference - 0.18 (95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.06, p = 0.004) in comparison to conventional treatment group.

CONCLUSION

While tolvaptan administration was related to better renal outcomes, unresolved heterogeneities and various factors could have influenced our findings. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of tolvaptan in the treatment of this patient population.

The role of tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Several conflicting reviews have concluded that the use of loop diuretics is associated with poorer clinical and safety outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan as an adjunct to conventional diuretic therapy in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library until 24 May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of tolvaptan with conventional therapy and placebo in patients with AHF. The quality assessment of the included trials was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to examine the dosage effect of tolvaptan.

Result

A total of 17 studies with 18 reports, involving 10,039 patients, were selected. The tolvaptan add-on therapy significantly alleviated dyspnea [24 h: RR 1.16 (1.04, 1.29), 48 h: RR 1.18 (1.04, 1.33)], reduced body weight within 48 h [Asian group, MD -0.93 (-1.48, -0.38); non-Asian group, MD -2.76 (-2.88, -2.65)], reduced edema [RR 1.08 (1.02, 1.15)], increased serum sodium [non-Asian group, MD 3.40 (3.02, 3.78)], and resulted in a change in serum creatinine [MD -0.10 (-0.18, -0.01)]. No significant differences were observed in mortality and rehospitalization. The NMA suggested that an intermediate dosage (15 mg/day) might offer the best efficacy in reducing dyspnea within 24 h, reducing edema, increasing serum sodium, and lowering the incidence of worsening renal function (WRF).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the meta-analysis showed that tolvaptan contributed to the short-term alleviation of congestive symptoms, elevated sodium levels, and a lower incidence of WRF. However, no significant benefits were observed in long-term symptoms, rehospitalization rates, and mortality. An intermediate dosage of tolvaptan might be considered the optimal choice for various clinical outcomes.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42023420288).

Effects of door-to-tolvaptan time on short-term clinical outcome in patients with acute heart failure

AIMS

We investigated the effects of door-to-tolvaptan (D2T) time on short-term urine volume and in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with AHF, treated with tolvaptan at two hospitals, were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. The D2T time was defined as the time elapsed from the arrival of a patient at a participating hospital to the first administration of tolvaptan. The group with the D2T time within 6 h was defined as the 'early group'. The primary outcome was 48-h urine volume. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital death, length of hospital stay, and worsening renal function (WRF) incidence. A restricted cubic spline model was used to evaluate the presence of a nonlinear association between the D2T time and 48-h urine volume and the odds ratio of WRF incidence. Our study included a total of 138 patients with AHF who were started on tolvaptan after hospitalization. The median D2T time was 5.3 h (interquartile range: 3.0-31.9 h). Seventy-four patients (53.6%) were classified to be in the early group. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups: mean age (85.4 ± 9.6 years vs. 84.5 ± 9.5 years; P = 0.59) and male sex (n = 22 [33.3%] vs. n = 29 [46%]; P = 0.16), except that patients in the early group had higher systolic blood pressure than those in the delayed group (138.2 ± 22.9 vs. 125.7 ± 21.7; P = 0.001). The initial tolvaptan dose in the delayed group was much lower than that in the early group (7.5 [7.5, 7.5] vs. 7.5 [5.6, 7.5] mg; P = 0.01). Total urine volume in 48 h did not differ in the early and delayed groups (4113 ± 1758 mL vs. 4201 ± 1893 mL; P = 0.80). The relationship between D2T time and total urine volume within 48 h increased slightly, with a peak at a D2T time of 15 h, and gradually decreased, thereafter. In-hospital death and the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups (n = 1, 1.3% vs. n = 4, 6.3%; P = 0.18, and 5.0 [12.0, 30.0] vs. 22.0 [14.5, 30.0] days; P = 0.17, respectively). Notably, the restricted cubic spline model for the odds ratio of WRF incidence increased as the D2T time was delayed (P for effect<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The shorter D2T time did not affect the short-term urine volume and in-hospital outcomes but reduced the risk of WRF incidence in patients with AHF.

The characteristics and outcomes in patients with acute heart failure who used tolvaptan: from KCHF registry

AIMS

The use of tolvaptan is increasing in clinical practice in Japan. However, the characteristics of patients who used tolvaptan and the timing of its use in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) are not fully elucidated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among consecutive 4056 patients in the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry, we analysed 3802 patients after excluding patients on dialysis, prior or unknown tolvaptan use at admission, and unknown timing of tolvaptan use, and we divided them into two groups: tolvaptan use (N = 773) and no tolvaptan use (N = 3029). The prevalence of tolvaptan use varied widely from 48.7% to 0% across the participating centres. Factors independently associated with tolvaptan use were diabetes, poor medical adherence, oedema, pleural effusion, hyponatraemia, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation, dobutamine infusion within 24 h, and additional inotropes infusion beyond 24 h after admission. The mortality rate at 90 days after admission was significantly higher in the tolvaptan use group than in the no tolvaptan use group (14.3% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.049). However, after adjustment, the excess mortality risk of tolvaptan use relative to no tolvaptan use was no longer significant (hazard ratio = 1.53, 95% confidence interval = 0.77-3.02, P = 0.22). Patients with tolvaptan use had a longer hospital stay [median (interquartile range): 22 (15-34) days vs. 15 (11-21) days, P < 0.0001] and a higher prevalence of worsening renal failure (47.0% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.0001) and worsening heart failure (24.8% vs. 14.4%, P < 0.0001) than those without.

CONCLUSIONS

AHF patients with tolvaptan use had more congestive status with poorer in-hospital outcomes and higher short-term mortality than those without tolvaptan use.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02334891 (NCT02334891) and https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000017241 (UMIN000015238).

Tolvaptan's Association with Low Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

INTRODUCTION

Furosemide, a loop diuretic, is often empirically used to treat acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) initially. Conversely, decongestion using tolvaptan, an aquaretic, is thought to maintain renal function compared to furosemide. However, it has not been investigated in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) at high risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to investigate AKI incidence using tolvaptan add-on treatment, compared to increased furosemide treatment for patients with ADHF complicated by advanced CKD.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2) who developed ADHF under outpatient furosemide treatment. The exposure was set to tolvaptan add-on treatment, and the control was set to increased furosemide treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 163 patients enrolled, 79 were in the tolvaptan group and 84 in the furosemide group. The mean age was 71.6 years, the percentage of males was 63.8%, the mean eGFR was 15.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, and patients with CKD stage G5 were 61.9%. AKI incidence was 17.7% in the tolvaptan group and 42.9% in the furosemide group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.34 [0.13-0.86], p = 0.023 in multivariate logistic regression analysis). Persistent AKI incidence was 11.8% in the tolvaptan group and 32.9% in the furosemide group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.34 [0.10-1.06], p = 0.066 in the multinomial logit analysis).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that tolvaptan may be better than furosemide in patients with ADHF experiencing complicated advanced CKD.

Prognostic Impact of the Early Use of Tolvaptan in Elderly Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

The number of elderly patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is increasing, and it is often difficult to treat. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using tolvaptan early after hospitalization in elderly patients with ADHF and the prognosis one year after hospitalization. This study enrolled 185 patients with ADHF who were admitted for the first time. Tolvaptan was administered within 24 h after admission. These patients were assigned to two groups: over 80 years old (n = 109) and under 80 years old (n = 76). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the occurrence of MACCE within one year (25% vs. 20%, p = 0.59). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the over-80 group (12% vs. 2%, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidence of worsening renal failure (11% vs. 7%, p = 0.46) and hypernatremia (5% vs. 9%, p = 1.0), and in the duration of hospitalization (19.2 days vs. 18.8 days, p = 0.8). Tolvaptan might be effective and safe in elderly patients with ADHF, and there was no difference in the incidence of MACCE within one year.

Relationship between early drop in systolic blood pressure, worsening renal function, and in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure: a retrospective, observational study

This study aimed to determine the optimal cut-off value of the early drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) for worsening renal function (WRF) in hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) and analyze predictors of WRF and the early drop in SBP at that threshold. We retrospectively enrolled 396 patients with acute decompensated HF. The early drop in SBP was defined as the difference between baseline and SBP measured 24 h after hospitalization. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal cut-off value of the early drop in SBP for WRF and evaluated the effect of the early drop in SBP on in-hospital mortality by multivariate logistic regression analyses. The mean age of the patients was 73.4 ± 14.7 years, and 61.2% were men. A 14.0% drop in SBP was identified as the optimal cut-off value for WRF from the ROC curve analysis. An early drop in SBP ≥ 14.0% was associated with WRF in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 7.84; 95% confidence interval 4.06-15.14; P < 0.0001). The dose of intravenous furosemide within 24 h of admission was one of the predictors of the early drop in SBP ≥ 14.0%, while no early drop in SBP was a predictor of in-hospital mortality in multivariate logistic regression models. In conclusion, the optimal cut-off value for WRF in patients with HF was a 14.0% drop in SBP within 24 h of admission. The early drop in SBP ≥ 14.0% was one of the predictors of WRF in patients with HF. However, no early drop in SBP was associated with in-hospital mortality. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (UMIN000035989).

Incidence, severity, risk factors and outcomes of acute kidney injury in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Old age was identified as a strong risk factor for acute kidney injury (AKI). Our objectives were to provide estimates of AKI, risk factors and outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years for whom data are scarce.

METHODS

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials between 2005 and 2021 with patients of mean or median age ≥ 75 years, reporting AKI according to current definitions. Data on AKI incidence, risk factors and mortality were analyzed separately in unselected (UC) and acute heart failure (AHF) cohorts.

RESULTS

Twenty-six observational studies and 4 randomized controlled trials with 51,111 UC and 25,414 AHF patients were included. Ages averaged 79.4 and 79.8 years, respectively. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) of AKI rates were 26.29% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 13.20-41.97) (UC) and 24.21% (95% CI 20.03-28.65) (AHF). In both cohorts, AKI was associated with decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline, chronic kidney disease (UC: RR 1.80 (95% CI 1.15-2.80), AHF: RR 1.51 (95% CI 1.26-1.95) and hypertension (UC: RR 1.30 (95% CI 1.09-1.56), AHF: RR 1.07 (95% CI 1.05-1.09). RRs of AKI in patients on renin-angiotensin-inhibitors were 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.97) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.98) in UC and AHF, respectively. AKI was consistently associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality (UC: RR 3.15 (95% CI 2.28-4.35), AHF: RR 4.28 (95% CI 2.53-7.24).

CONCLUSION

AKI is frequent in patients ≥ 75 years. While reduced renal function at baseline, CKD and hypertension were associated with AKI development, renin-angiotensin-inhibitors may be protective. Older AKI patients showed higher short-term mortality rates.

Korean Society of Nephrology 2022 recommendations on controversial issues in diagnosis and management of hyponatremia

The Korean Society for Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Research, in collaboration with the Korean Society of Nephrology, has published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) document for hyponatremia treatment. The document is based on an extensive evidence-based review of the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia with the multidisciplinary participation of representative experts in hyponatremia with methodologist support for guideline development. This CPG consists of 12 recommendations (two for diagnosis, eight for treatment, and two for special situations) based on eight detailed topics and nine key questions. Each recommendation begins with statements graded by the strength of the recommendations and the quality of the evidence. Each statement is followed by rationale supporting the recommendations. The committee issued conditional recommendations in favor of rapid intermittent bolus administration of hypertonic saline in severe hyponatremia, the use of vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure with hypervolemic hyponatremia, and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis with moderate to severe hyponatremia, the individualization of desmopressin use, and strong recommendation on the administration of isotonic fluids as maintenance fluid therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients. We hope that this CPG will provide useful recommendations in practice, with the aim of providing clinical support for shared decision-making to improve patient outcomes.

Tolvaptan Reduces Extracellular Fluid per Amount of Body Fluid Reduction Less Markedly than Conventional Diuretics

Objective Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, is a water diuretic, removing electrolyte-free water from the kidneys and affecting the water balance between the intracellular and extracellular fluid. We previously reported that tolvaptan efficiently reduced the intracellular fluid volume, suggesting its utility for treating cellular edema. Furthermore, tolvaptan is known for its low incidence of worsening the renal function, with conventional diuretics use associated with worsening of the renal function Methods In this retrospective observational study, five chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with fluid retention were assessed by the bioelectrical impedance (BIA) method twice (before and after tolvaptan therapy). Tolvaptan was used with conventional diuretics. The post/pre ratio of extracellular water (ECW)/total body water (TBW) in the tolvaptan group was compared with that in 18 CKD patients undergoing body fluid reduction with conventional diuretics alone (conventional diuretics groups), taking the reduced amount of body fluid into consideration. Results Removing body fluid, either by tolvaptan or by conventional diuretics alone, decreased the ECW/TBW ratio. Of note, the reduction in extracellular fluid was milder in the tolvaptan group than in the conventional diuretics group. Conclusion Tolvaptan reduces the extracellular fluid per amount of body fluid reduction less markedly than conventional diuretics.

Korean Society of Nephrology 2022 Recommendations on controversial issues in diagnosis and management of hyponatremia

The Korean Society for Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Research, in collaboration with the Korean Society of Nephrology, has published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) document for hyponatremia treatment. The document is based on an extensive evidence-based review of the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia with the multidisciplinary participation of representative experts in hyponatremia with methodologist support for guideline development. This CPG consists of 12 recommendations (two for diagnosis, eight for treatment, and two for special situations) based on eight detailed topics and nine key questions. Each recommendation begins with statements graded by the strength of the recommendations and the quality of the evidence. Each statement is followed by rationale supporting the recommendations. The committee issued conditional recommendations in favor of rapid intermittent bolus administration of hypertonic saline in severe hyponatremia, the use of vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure with hypervolemic hyponatremia, and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis with moderate to severe hyponatremia, the individualization of desmopressin use, and strong recommendation on the administration of isotonic fluids as maintenance fluid therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients. We hope that this CPG will provide useful recommendations in practice, with the aim of providing clinical support for shared decision-making to improve patient outcomes.

Possible Option for Treatment of Severe Congestive Heart Failure Under Mechanical Ventilation Using Tolvaptan via Nasogastric Tube: A Single-Center Analysis

Background: The oral vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan causes aquaresis, and its effect on heart failure is proven. However, it is not recommended in patients who are unable to appropriately respond to thirst because of possible severe hypernatremia. Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of tolvaptan treatment via nasogastric tube in patients who are unable to respond to thirst by fluid ingestion. Methods: We analyzed 70 consecutive patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) who were resistant to loop diuretics and treated with tolvaptan. From the 70 patients, 12 required endotracheal intubation under sedation (Group Tube; GT) and 58 did not (Group Oral; GO). We administered tolvaptan orally in GO; however, in GT, we had to administer tolvaptan via nasogastric tube to achieve pulmonary decongestion quickly. In GT, serum sodium level was monitored closely, and intravenous fluid infusion volume was controlled in the intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes, including safety and efficacy parameters, were evaluated. Results: In both groups, tolvaptan treatment did not develop a significant rise in serum sodium level compared with baseline, and the incidence of worsening renal failure was comparable, despite greater net fluid loss and higher doses of loop diuretics used in patients of GT compared to GO. In GT, all patients achieved pulmonary decongestion and were weaned from mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: In sedated patients with severe CHF who are unable to respond to thirst by fluid ingestion, tolvaptan can be used without clinically significant hypernatremia under close monitoring in the ICU.

Efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in acute heart failure patients during long-distance transportation

AIMS

Treating patients with acute heart failure is difficult at the local hospitals in medically depopulated areas where cardiologists are generally absent. These patients require long-distance and time-consuming transportation to the intensive care units. It is well known that tolvaptan is effective for the treatment of congestive heart failure, but the effect of prehospital tolvaptan use in patients is not well evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prehospital tolvaptan use in patients with acute congestive heart failure who require long-distance and time-consuming transportation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 30 patients who were newly diagnosed with acute heart failure at Wakkanai City Hospital and transported to Nayoro City General Hospital between January 2013 and May 2020. The patients were classified into those who received tolvaptan (tolvaptan group, n = 18) and did not receive tolvaptan (control group, n = 12).

RESULTS

The percentage of patient survival at discharge did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (100% [tolvaptan] vs. 91% [control], p = 0.414). During transportation, the percentage of patients in the tolvaptan group who required increased oxygen doses was statistically significantly lower than that in the control group (0% vs. 36%, p = 0.0181). Patients in the tolvaptan group had statistically significantly shorter intensive care unit stays (median: 2 days vs. 6 days, p = 0.0376), less days to discontinuation of oxygen (median: 2.8 days vs. 6.9 days, p < 0.00125), and less days to ambulation (median: 1.5 days vs. 7.5 days, p = 0.0362) compared with the control group. In the tolvaptan group, blood pressure was not different; however, heart rate was statistically significantly reduced (99 ± 21 vs. 88 ± 21 beats per minute, p = 0.016) during transportation.

CONCLUSION

The use of tolvaptan in patients with acute heart failure requiring long-distance transport is safe and may show better clinical course compared with conventional therapies.

Renoprotection by long-term low-dose tolvaptan in patients with heart failure and hyponatremia

AIMS

In previous randomized controlled trials, the use of tolvaptan (TLV) at a fixed dose of 30 mg/day for 1 year did not provide renal benefits in patients with heart failure (HF). This retrospective, cohort study examined the renoprotective effects of long-term, flexible-dose, and lower-dose TLV use.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Tolvaptan users were defined as patients receiving TLV for at least 180 consecutive days or those who continued it until death, any cardiac events, or renal replacement therapy even if it was taken for <180 days. Of a total of 584 HF patients, 78 TLV users were identified. The median age, baseline B-type natriuretic peptide, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 71 years, 243 pg/mL, and 54 mL/min/1.73 m² , respectively. During follow-up (median, 461 days), TLV use (median average dose, 7.5 mg/day) was associated with frequent dose reductions of loop diuretics (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.2), particularly in patients with serum sodium ≤135 mEq/L (IRR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.7) (P_interaction  = 0.04). In a mixed effects model, propensity score (PS)-matched TLV users had higher eGFRs over time than PS-matched never-users (P < 0.01). The entire cohort analyses (N = 584) yielded similar results. The renal benefit of TLV in terms of annualized eGFR slope was more pronounced in patients with lower sodium levels (P_interaction  = 0.03). This effect modification was extinguished when patients who underwent a loop diuretic dose reduction during the follow-up period were excluded from the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term, flexible-dose, and low-dose TLV use was associated with better renal function, particularly in hyponatremic HF, possibly due to its loop diuretic dose-sparing effect in the long term.

Risks of vaptans in hypernatremia and serum sodium overcorrection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Serum sodium overcorrection and hypernatremia are significant health risks. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risks of vaptans in hypernatremia and serum sodium overcorrection.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL for randomised controlled trials. We included studies comparing vaptans and placebo with data on hypernatremia and serum sodium overcorrection. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias assessment tool. Fixed-effect model meta-analysis was used to pool the data. Different analyses were performed to ensure the accuracy of the results.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis of hypernatremia incidence. Treatment with vaptans resulted in a higher risk of hypernatremia than placebo (3.8% vs 1.0%, odds ratio [OR] 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97-3.68). The subgroup with baseline hyponatremia had a lower risk of hypernatremia incidence; however, the use of loop diuretics increased the risk. Fourteen studies were included in the analysis of the incidence of serum sodium overcorrection. A higher risk of serum sodium overcorrection was found in using vaptans vs placebo (4.4% vs 1.4%; OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.32-3.86).

CONCLUSION

Vaptans showed higher risks in the incidence of hypernatremia and serum sodium overcorrection than placebo. In addition, combination with loop diuretics increased the risk of hypernatremia. The risk of serum sodium overcorrection should be concerned in patients with hyponatremia and normal serum sodium equally. Using a low dose of vaptans can reduce both risks.

Characterization of tolvaptan response and its impact on the outcome for patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Conventional diuretic therapy such as loop diuretics is a cornerstone of the treatment for heart failure (HF). Diuretic response is an important factor in determining resistance to HF therapy and has been shown to be associated with subsequent clinical outcome. Tolvaptan (TVP), a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, has a favorable profile in terms of rapid fluid removal and less aggravation of renal function. We hypothesized that the response to TVP might be associated with the subsequent clinical outcome.

METHOD

In this single-center retrospective study, 148 consecutive HF patients who were administered TVP from 2014 through 2018 [age 79 (69-86) years, male 89 (60%)] were included. Ninety-six patients were divided into TVP responder [N = 39 (41%)] and non-responder groups based on the cut-off value of gained urine output (+ 93 ml/mg TVP /day) on the day after TVP was introduced.

RESULTS

Early TVP introduction (p = 0.012) and lower dose of loop diuretics (p = 0.043) were predictors of TVP responder. For 2 years after discharge, TVP responders showed more favorable outcomes regarding the primary endpoint defined as the composite of all-cause death and HF readmission (p = 0.034, log-rank test) and HF readmission (p = 0.005). A multivariable Cox model analysis revealed that TVP responder was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 0.48, p = 0.041). TVP responders had a lower number of HF readmissions over a 1-year period (p = 0.002). TVP response was independently associated with the number of HF readmissions (p = 0.015). The proportion of patients with an extended period between discharge and HF readmission after TVP administration was higher in responders than non-responders (67% vs. 23%, p = 0.006). These associations of TVP response and post-discharge outcomes were more evident in patients who continued TVP after discharge.

CONCLUSION

TVP response can be indicative of subsequent clinical outcomes and may be informative when considering advanced care planning.

Long-term administration of tolvaptan ameliorates annual decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in outpatients with chronic heart failure

Protective effects of tolvaptan against worsening renal function in acute heart failure have been shown. However, long-term effects of its agent on renal function remain to be elucidated. The present study investigated retrospectively whether long-term treatment with tolvaptan exerts renoprotective effects in patients with chronic heart failure, by comparing serial changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for years before and after tolvaptan administration. From 63 outpatients with chronic heart failure taking diuretics including tolvaptan, 34 patients whose eGFR levels were continuously measured for more than 6 months both before and after administration of tolvaptan (average dose, 7.8 mg/day at the end of the follow-up period) were selected as eligible for the present analyses. All eGFR values were separately plotted before and after the initiation of treatment with tolvaptan (except hospitalization periods) along the time course axis and the slope of the linear regression curve was calculated as an annual change in eGFR. The mean follow-up periods before and after tolvaptan administration were 1197 and 784 days (3.3 and 2.1 years), respectively. Changing rates of eGFR per year were significantly ameliorated after treatment with tolvaptan (mean ± SD, - 8.02 ± 9.35 to - 1.62 ± 5.09 mL/min/1.73m² /year, P = 0.001). In echocardiographic parameters, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter significantly decreased after tolvaptan administration, and the decrease in IVC diameter was correlated with the improvement of eGFR decline slope after administration of tolvaptan (P = 0.0075). This longitudinal observational study indicated that long-term treatment with tolvaptan ameliorated annual decline in eGFR in outpatients with chronic heart failure. Our findings suggest that tolvaptan has a protective effect against chronically worsening renal function in heart failure patients.

[Retrospective Observational Study on Predictors of Body Weight and BNP Teduction in Cases of Tolvaptan Induction for Heart Failure]

Tolvaptan (TLV) carries the risk of serious side effects, and its introduction requires hospitalization. Therefore, it is important from the viewpoints of safety and medical economics to predict in advance, the patients for whom it will be effective and introduce it. The purpose of this study was to investigate the noninvasive and simple predictors for identifying TLV responders. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with heart failure who had TLV introduced at our hospital from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. By using the body weight and BNP reduction as the effect indices, predictors of body weight and BNP reduction were extracted by logistic analysis. The sensitivity and specificity at the cutoff value obtained by ROC analysis were also examined. Among 85 subjects, urine sodium concentration >63 mEq/L [odds ratio (OR): 6.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-27.4] was detected as a predictor of body weight reduction. The sensitivity at this cutoff value was 81%, and the specificity was 70%. Serum osmolarity>291 mOsm/L (OR: 3.76, 95% CI: 1.00-14.2), urine potassium concentration<21 mEq/L (OR: 4.45, 95% CI: 1.09-18.2), and urine sodium concentration>71 mEq/L (OR: 7.38, 95% CI: 2.05-26.6) were detected as predictors of BNP reduction. The sensitivities were 62%, 53%, and 73%, and the specificities were 58%, 68%, and 68%, respectively. Therefore, it was suggested that urine sodium concentration may be useful as a predictor of body weight and BNP decrease after TLV induction.

Clinical effectiveness and adverse events associated with tolvaptan in patients above 90 years of age with acute decompensated heart failure

With the aging society, the number of very-elderly (VE) patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is increasing. Although tolvaptan is recommended for patients with ADHF in whom conventional diuretic therapy is ineffective, few reports exist on VE patients over 90 years of age. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and adverse events associated with tolvaptan in VE patients with ADHF. From January 2011 to December 2018, we retrospectively studied 180 patients with ADHF who were first administered tolvaptan during hospitalization. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, VE patients who were ≥ 90 years of age (n = 32) and not-VE patients (NVE) who were < 90 years of age (n = 148). The primary effective endpoints were the total urine volume and change in body weight. The safety endpoints evaluated were the incidence of hypernatremia (≥ 150 mEq/L) and worsening renal function (WRF) at any time during hospitalization. The median [interquartile range] patient age was 93 [91-94] years in the VE group and 80 [69-85] years in the NVE group. The mean dose of tolvaptan for the first week of administration was similar between groups (7.9 ± 5.0 mg, VE group; 7.3 ± 3.7 mg, NVE group; p = 0.52). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the total urine volume at 24 h (1901 ± 666 mL, VE group; 2101 ± 1167 mL, NVE group; p = 0.33) and that at 48 h (3707 ± 1274 mL, VE group; 4195 ± 1990 mL, NVE group; p = 0.19) and in the mean change in body weight (- 2.5 ± 2.0 kg, VE group; -2.7 ± 2.4 kg, NVE group; p = 0.70). The median duration of hospitalization was 24 [20-9] and 31 [20-42] days in the VE and NVE groups, respectively (p = 0.67). The incidence of hypernatremia (6.3% (2/32), VE group; 3.4% (5/148), NVE group; p = 0.61) and WRF (25.0% (8/32) VE group; 19.6% (29/148), NVE group; p = 0.31) was similar between the groups. In conclusion, tolvaptan has similar clinical effectiveness in increasing urine volume and decreasing body weight, without increased adverse events, in VE patients with ADHF who were ≥ 90 years of age compared to NVE patients with ADHF.

Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Tolvaptan is an effective therapy for heart failure patients with symptomatic congestion and hyponatremia. The efficacy of its use in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in LVAD patients. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between January 2014 and August 2018. Among 217 consecutive LVAD patients, tolvaptan was used in 20 patients. Mean age was 46 ± 14 years old and 14 patients were males. The duration of tolvaptan therapy was 4 (interquartile range 1-8) days. Urine volume significantly increased from 2,623 ± 1,109 ml/day before tolvaptan to 4,308 ± 1,432 ml/day during tolvaptan therapy (p < 0.001). Serum sodium increased from 127 ± 3 to 133 ± 3 mEq/L at the end of tolvaptan therapy (p < 0.001). No patients developed hypernatremia (serum sodium >150 mEq/L). The 90-day overall survival following tolvaptan therapy was 89% in both the tolvaptan group and a propensity score-matched non-tolvaptan group (p = 0.918). Survival free of heart failure readmissions was also comparable between the groups (p = 0.751). In conclusion, short-term use of tolvaptan following LVAD implantation is a safe and effective therapy to augment diuresis and improve hyponatremia.

Tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of tolvaptan as an add-on to traditional diuretics in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined AHF patients treated with tolvaptan as a combination therapy with traditional diuretics published on or before December 2, 2019. Efficacy indicators such as improved dyspnea, reduced edema, and changes in urine output and body weight were evaluated. In-hospital mortality and worsening renal function (WRF) were measured as safety indicators. Data from the published literature included in this study were independently extracted by two reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCTs. Twelve RCTs involving 5577 patients admitted for AHF were included. Compared with traditional diuretics alone, add-on tolvaptan significantly relieved dyspnea, reduced weight, increased total urine volume and changes in urine volume from baseline, reduced edema, and increased serum sodium concentration in the short term without increasing the mortality. Most importantly, a low dose of tolvaptan (7.5-15 mg/d) significantly reduced the incidence of WRF, while a high dose (30 mg/d) had the opposite effect. Short-term add-on tolvaptan in hospitalized AHF patients could significantly relieve shortness of breath, reduce body weight, improve edema, and increase urine output and serum sodium concentrations without increasing mortality. The protective effects of add-on tolvaptan against WRF, however, were observed at low doses, but not at high doses.

Renoprotective effect of tolvaptan in patients with new-onset acute heart failure

AIMS

Although tolvaptan has been reported to prevent worsening renal function (WRF) in patients with advanced acute heart failure (AHF), evidence regarding the effect of tolvaptan on renal function in patients with new-onset AHF is not available. This study aimed to investigate the renoprotective effect of tolvaptan in patients hospitalized with new-onset AHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 122 consecutive patients hospitalized with new-onset AHF between May 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. WRF was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.4 μmol/L) within 48 h or a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine after hospitalization. The furosemide group (n = 75) and the tolvaptan add-on group (n = 47) were compared. The tolvaptan group consists of patients who received tolvaptan as an individual physicians' decision. The incidence of WRF was significantly lower in the tolvaptan add-on group (8.5%) than in the furosemide group (24.0%, P = 0.03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that tolvaptan treatment was an independent variable related to the prevention of WRF [odds ratio (OR), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.85]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed a more favourable effect of tolvaptan in patients with serum creatinine ≥1.1 mg/dL on admission (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.98) and an ejection fraction <50% (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower incidence of WRF was observed in patients with new-onset AHF who were treated with the tolvaptan add-on therapy, specifically those with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and renal impairment on admission.

Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients More Than 90 Years Old With Acute Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

The oral vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist, tolvaptan, causes aquaresis and improves symptoms in patients with congestive heart failure. However, few studies have explored the effect of tolvaptan in acute heart failure (AHF) patients ≥90 years old.

METHODS

This study enrolled 106 AHF patients treated with tolvaptan added to standard therapy. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: ≥90-year-old patients (over-90 group, mean 92 ± 2 years, n = 45) and <90-year-old patients (under-90 group, mean 76 ± 11 years, n = 61). Patients' characteristics were assessed, and efficacy and safety were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The over-90 group had a lower proportion of male patients, lower body weight, and higher ejection fraction. The under-90 group had significantly higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in total urine volume at 24 and 48 hours (1934 ± 983 mL vs 1816 ± 1028 mL, P = 0.58 and 3806 ± 1444 mL vs 4078 ± 1851 mL, P=0.47, respectively), the mean change in body weight (-3.0 ± 2.7 kg vs -2.6 ± 2.6 kg, P = 0.50), improvement of congestive symptoms, changes in serum sodium and creatinine levels, the incidences of hypernatremia (n = 0, 0% vs n = 1, 1.6%, P = 0.63), and worsening renal function (n = 9, 20% vs n = 17, 28%, P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in AHF patients aged more than 90 years were comparable to those of <90 years old. Tolvaptan provides a complementary therapeutic option for AHF patients aged more than 90 years.

Efficacy of Tolvaptan in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: There is no known therapy with proven efficacy for improving clinical outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tolvaptan (TLV) in elderly HFpEF patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study involved 100 consecutive elderly HFpEF patients hospitalized at the Nagoya Heart Center, Japan. Inclusion criteria were: (1) patients aged ≥75 years; (2) first hospitalization secondary to HF; (3) received medical therapy for HF, without invasive treatment; and (4) clinical follow-up for >6 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was rehospitalization due to worsening HF, and the secondary endpoint was worsening renal function (WRF) during hospitalization and at 6 months after discharge. Sixty background-matched HFpEF patients were divided into 2 groups: with TLV therapy (TLV (+), n = 29) and without TLV therapy (TLV (–), n = 31). In the TLV (+) group, TLV therapy was continued after discharge. Clinical outcomes of these patients were evaluated. Results: Bed rest period and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in the TLV (+) group than in the TLV (−) group. The dose of loop diuretics, mean serum creatinine levels, and incidence of WRF development were significantly lower in the TLV (+) group. Incidence of rehospitalization was also significantly lower in the TLV (+) group (log-rank test; p = 0.018). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that TLV therapy reduces the incidence of rehospitalization in elderly patients with HFpEF. Conclusions: TLV therapy reduced the bed rest period, length of hospital stay, and rate of rehospitalization without WRF in elderly HFpEF patients, suggesting that TLV could represent an effective therapy for this group of patients.

Effects of tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: meta-analysis on randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Treating acute decompensated heartfailure (ADHF) for improving congestion with diuretics may cause worsening renal function (WRF), but the clinical efficacy of tolvaptan add-on therapy on reducing WRF in ADHF patients is inconsistent. This analysis is to evaluate the effects of tolvaptan add-on therapy on reducing WRF in ADHF patients.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomised trials of tolvaptan add-on therapy on reducing WRF in ADHF patients. The MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant articles from their inception to 31 October, 2017. Two reviewers filtrated the documents on WRF, short-term all-cause mortality, body weight decreased, elevated sodium level for calculating pooled relatives risks, weighted mean difference and associated 95% CIs. We used fixed-effects or random-effects models according to I² statistics.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Seven random controlled trials with 937 patients were included for analysis. Compared with the control, tolvaptan add-on therapy did not improve incidence of worsening renal function (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.26, p=0.31, I²=66%) and short-term all-cause mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.56, p=0.61, I²=0%). On subgroup analyses, there was a suggestion of possible effect modification by dose of tolvaptan, in which benefit was observed in low-dose (≤15 mg/day) group (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.02, p=0.05, I²=54%), but not with high-dose (30 mg) group (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.78, p=0.05, I²=0%). However, tolvaptan add-on therapy reduced body weight in 2 days (standardised mean difference -0.49, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.34, p<0.00001, I²=0%), increased sodium level (mean difference 1.56, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.07, p=0.04, I²=0%).

CONCLUSION

The result suggests that comparing with the standard diuretic therapy, tolvaptan add-on therapy did not reduce the incidence of WRF and short-term mortality, however, it can decrease body weight and increase the sodium level in patients who are with ADHF. Further researches are still required for confirmation.

Hemodynamic and Hormonal Effects of Tolvaptan for Heart Failure

Tolvaptan (TLV) is a diuretic agent administrated for heart failure (HF) only in Japan. Many clinical findings have been obtained from the accumulation of clinical experience, and the administration of TLV reportedly avoids causing a reduction in the renal function. In addition, TLV has been reported to exert effects other than diuresis. The early start of TLV after hospitalization shortens the length of the hospital stay, and continuous TLV after discharge extends the period until re-hospitalization of HF patients. TLV is thought to function via vasopressin V2 receptor antagonism. However, no significant differences in the long-term prognosis were noted between the group using TLV and not using TLV in the Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study (EVEREST) trial, and effects other than diuresis are not useful for all HF patients. Therefore, it is necessary to identify patients who may experience effects other than diuresis with TLV administration. The accumulation of more patients and findings from further large-scale clinical trials will be necessary in order to clarify these points.

Efficacy of tolvaptan for chronic heart failure: Study protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The protocol of this study will be proposed for systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF).

METHODS

We will retrieve the following electronic databases for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of tolvaptan in patients with CHF: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Information, and Wanfang Data. Each database will be retrieved from inception to February 1, 2019 without any limitations. The entire process of study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality evaluation will be conducted by 2 independent authors.

RESULTS

The protocol of this proposed study will compare the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in the treatment of patients with CHF. The outcomes will include all-cause mortality, change in body weight, urine output, change in serum sodium; and incidence of all adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this proposed study will summarize the current evidence of tolvaptan for CHF.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All data used in this systematic review will be collected from the previous published trials. Thus, no research ethics approval is needed for this study. The findings of this study will be published at a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42019120818.

Impact of renal dysfunction on the management and outcome of acute heart failure: results from the French prospective, multicentre, DeFSSICA survey

OBJECTIVES

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is the combination of acute heart failure syndrome (AHF) and renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≤60 mL/min). Real-life data were used to compare the management and outcome of AHF with and without renal dysfunction.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicentre.

SETTING

Twenty-six academic, community and regional hospitals in France.

PARTICIPANTS

507 patients with AHF were assessed in two groups according to renal function: group 1 (patients with CRS (CrCl ≤60 mL/min): n=335) and group 2 (patients with AHF with normal renal function (CrCl >60 mL/min): n=172).

RESULTS

Differences were observed (group 1 vs group 2) at admission for the incidence of chronic heart failure (56.42% vs 47.67%), use of furosemide (60.9% vs 52.91%), insulin (15.52% vs 9.3%) and amiodarone (14.33% vs 4.65%); additionally, more patients in group 1 carried a defibrillator (4.78% vs 0%), had ≥2 hospitalisations in the last year (15.52% vs 5.81%) and were under the care of a cardiologist (72.24% vs 61.63%). Clinical signs were broadly similar in each group. Brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and BNP prohormone were higher in group 1 than group 2 (1157.5 vs 534 ng/L and 5120 vs 2513 ng/mL), and more patients in group 1 were positive for troponin (58.2% vs 44.19%), had cardiomegaly (51.04% vs 37.21%) and interstitial opacities (60.3% vs 47.67%). The only difference in emergency treatment was the use of nitrates, (higher in group 1 (21.9% vs 12.21%)). In-hospital mortality and the percentage of patients still hospitalised after 30 days were similar between groups, but the median stay was longer in group 1 (8 days vs 6 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal impairment in AHF should not limit the use of loop diuretics and/or vasodilators, but early assessment of pulmonary congestion and close monitoring of the efficacy of conventional therapies is encouraged to allow rapid and appropriate implementation of alternative therapies if necessary.

Impaired Renal Function May Not Negate the Efficacy of Tolvaptan in the Treatment of Cirrhotic Patients with Refractory Ascites

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Tolvaptan, an oral vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, has been widely used for the treatment of patients with cirrhosis and ascites. However, its efficacy in patients with renal dysfunction remains unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and severe chronic kidney disease (s-CKD).

METHODS

We studied 43 patients with liver cirrhosis who received tolvaptan (7.5 mg/day) for refractory ascites. s-CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Response to tolvaptan was defined as weight loss ≥ 1.5 kg in 7 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (42%) had s-CKD (s-CKD group), while the other 25 patients (58%) did not have s-CKD (n-CKD group). Rates of response to tolvaptan were similar: 68% in the n-CKD group and 56% in the s-CKD group. Urine volumes increased significantly from baseline to day 7 in both groups. Incidences of adverse events were also similar (P = 0.93). Mean eGFR did not decline even in the s-CKD group (27.3 ± 2.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline vs. 26.6 ± 2.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 on day 7; P = 0.9). The cumulative survival rate did not differ significantly between the n-CKD and s-CKD groups. In the s-CKD group, responders obtained a better prognosis than non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolvaptan significantly increased urine volumes similarly in patients with s-CKD and n-CKD without affecting renal function. As responders achieved a better prognosis, tolvaptan could be a good option to treat ascites in patients with cirrhosis and s-CKD.

Addition of Tolvaptan Compared With Increased Dose of Furosemide in Heart Failure Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Under Furosemide Treatment

Background: Given that residual congestion is a predictor of poor outcome in patients with heart failure (HF), a therapeutic strategy for decongestion is required.

Methods and Results: Eighteen HF patients with fluid retention despite oral furosemide >20 mg/day, with chronic kidney disease (CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], <59 mL/min/1.73 m²) were enrolled. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: a tolvaptan group (tolvaptan, 7.5 mg/day, n=10) and a furosemide group (additional furosemide 20 mg/day, n=8), and followed up for 7 days. The urine volume significantly increased on day 3 in the tolvaptan group but not in the furosemide group. The body weight significantly decreased in the tolvaptan compared with the furosemide group on days 3 and 5. Although there was no difference in serum creatinine or eGFR in the 7 days between the 2 groups, serum cystatin C significantly decreased on day 7 in the tolvaptan group compared with the furosemide group. The residual congestion was more improved in the tolvaptan group than in the furosemide group.

Conclusions: Adding tolvaptan but not furosemide significantly increased urine volume, decreased body weight and improved residual congestion without affecting the renal function or electrolytes in patients with HF with CKD under furosemide treatment.

Prognostic factors for long-term outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure patients under tolvaptan treatment

Inconsistent results have been reported concerning the effect of tolvaptan treatment on long-term prognostic outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and data are limited on prognostic factors affecting this patient population. We investigated prognostic factors influencing long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ADHF treated with tolvaptan in a real-world setting. A total of 263 consecutive patients hospitalized for ADHF and treated with tolvaptan were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were stratified into those who developed the combined event of cardiac death or rehospitalization for worsening heart failure within 1 year (n = 108) and those who were free of this combined event within 1 year (n = 155). Adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that change in serum sodium level between pre-treatment and 24 h after tolvaptan administration [hazard ratio (HR) 0.913, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.841-0.989, p = 0.025] and the time taken for tolvaptan initiation from admission (HR 1.043, 95% CI 1.009-1.074, p = 0.015) were independent predictors of combined event occurrence within 1 year. Moreover, change in serum sodium level > 1 mEq/L between pre-treatment and 24 h after administration and initiation of tolvaptan < 5 days after admission correlated significantly with the incidence of the combined event (log-rank test p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively). In conclusion, increased serum sodium level early after administration and early initiation of tolvaptan are possibly useful for assessing the long-term prognosis after tolvaptan treatment in patients with ADHF.

Safety and Effectiveness of Tolvaptan Administration after Total Arch Replacement

BACKGROUND

Postoperative fluid overload in cardiovascular surgery is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Recently, tolvaptan (TLV), a selective vasopressin V2 antagonist, has been used for perioperative fluid management. This study aimed to validate the safety and effectiveness of TLV administration after total arch replacement (TAR) using selective cerebral perfusion.

METHODS

From August 2016 to December 2016, 11 patients who had undergone TAR for thoracic aortic aneurysm were included in this study. In addition to the conventional diuretics furosemide (20 mg) and spironolactone (25 mg), TLV (7.5 mg) was administered orally.

RESULTS

TLV increased urine output 1-3 days after administration. Body weight was gradually and steadily reduced until discharge. Neither renal nor liver dysfunction was recognized during the TLV administration.

CONCLUSION

The concomitant use of TLV and conventional diuretics is safe and effective for fluid management after TAR using cardiopulmonary bypass, selective cerebral perfusion, and hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Interventions for chronic non-hypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia

BACKGROUND

Chronic (present > 48 hours) non-hypovolaemic hyponatraemia occurs frequently, can be caused by various conditions, and is associated with shorter survival and longer hospital stays. Many treatments, such as fluid restriction or vasopressin receptor antagonists can be used to improve the hyponatraemia, but whether that translates into improved patient-important outcomes is less certain.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to 1) look at the benefits and harms of interventions for chronic non-hypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia when compared with placebo, no treatment or head-to-head; and 2) determine if benefits and harms vary in absolute or relative terms dependent on the specific compound within a drug class, on the dosage used, or the underlying disorder causing the hyponatraemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 1 December 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also screened the reference lists of potentially relevant studies, contacted authors, and screened the websites of regulatory agencies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of any intervention with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or any other intervention in patients with chronic non-hypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia. We also included subgroups with hyponatraemia from studies with broader inclusion criteria (e.g. people with chronic heart failure or people with cirrhosis with or without hyponatraemia), provided we could obtain outcomes for participants with hyponatraemia from the report or the study authors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We expressed treatment effects as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes (health-related quality of life, length of hospital stay, change from baseline in serum sodium concentration, cognitive function), and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (death, response and rapid increase in serum sodium concentration, hypernatraemia, polyuria, hypotension, acute kidney injury, liver function abnormalities) together with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 35 studies, enrolling 3429 participants. Twenty-eight studies (3189 participants) compared a vasopressin receptor antagonist versus placebo, usual care, no treatment, or fluid restriction. In adults with chronic, non-hypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia, vasopressin receptor antagonists have uncertain effects on death at six months (15 studies, 2330 participants: RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.33) due to risk of selective reporting and serious imprecision; and on health-related quality of life because results are at serious risk of performance, selective reporting and attrition bias, and suffer from indirectness related to the validity of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) in the setting of hyponatraemia. Vasopressin receptor antagonists may reduce hospital stay (low certainty evidence due to risk of performance bias and imprecision) (3 studies, 610 participants: MD -1.63 days, 95% CI -2.96 to -0.30), and may make little or no difference to cognitive function (low certainty evidence due to indirectness and imprecision). Vasopressin receptor antagonists probably increase the intermediate outcome of serum sodium concentration (21 studies, 2641 participants: MD 4.17 mmol/L, 95% CI 3.18 to 5.16), corresponding to two and a half as many people having a 5 to 6 mmol/L increase in sodium concentration compared with placebo at 4 to 180 days (moderate certainty evidence due to risk of attrition bias) (18 studies, 2014 participants: RR 2.49, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.18). But they probably also increase the risk of rapid serum sodium correction - most commonly defined as > 12 mmol/L/d (moderate certainty evidence due to indirectness) (14 studies, 2058 participants: RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.40) and commonly cause side-effects such as thirst (13 studies, 1666 participants: OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.80 to 4.27) and polyuria (6 studies, 1272 participants): RR 4.69, 95% CI 1.59 to 13.85) (high certainty evidence). The potential for liver toxicity remains uncertain due to large imprecision. Effects were generally consistent across the different agents, suggesting class effect.Data for other interventions such as fluid restriction, urea, mannitol, loop diuretics, corticosteroids, demeclocycline, lithium and phenytoin were largely absent.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people with chronic hyponatraemia, vasopressin receptor antagonists modestly raise serum sodium concentration at the cost of a 3% increased risk of it being rapid. To date there is very low certainty evidence for patient-important outcomes; the effects on mortality and health-related quality of life are unclear and do not rule out appreciable benefit or harm; there does not appear to be an important effect on cognitive function, but hospital stay may be slightly shorter, although available data are limited. Treatment decisions must weigh the value of an increase in serum sodium concentration against its short-term risks and unknown effects on patient-important outcomes. Evidence for other treatments is largely absent.Further studies assessing standard treatments such as fluid restriction or urea against placebo and one-another would inform practice and are warranted. Given the limited available evidence for patient-important outcomes, any study should include these outcomes in a standardised manner.

Use of tolvaptan vs. furosemide in older patients with heart failure : Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether older patients with acute heart failure (HF) receiving tolvaptan have decreased mortality rates and a better long-term prognosis than patients who receive furosemide. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to address this issue.

METHODS

The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for English-language RCTs published before September 2016 comparing tolvaptan with furosemide treatment in older patients (>65 years old) after acute HF. The primary outcomes assessed were 6‑month all-cause mortality and worsening renal function (WRF); the secondary outcomes were electrolyte disorders, hospital readmissions, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Out of 669 citations, six RCTs met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. There was a significant decrease in WRF (relative risk [RR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.86, p = 0.002) and in the hospitalization period (mean difference [MD] = -1.86, 95% CI = -3.70--0.02, p = 0.05), as well as a significant increase in urine volume within 3 days of tolvaptan administration (MD = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.41-1.76, p < 0.00001). There were significant differences in creatinine levels between subgroups (MD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.14-0.52, p = 0.0006). However, for the outcome of 6‑month all-cause mortality (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.29-1.06, p = 0.07), there was no significant difference among all subgroups. There were significant differences in serum sodium concentration (MD = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.02-1.34, p = 0.04) but no significant changes in systolic blood pressure (MD = 3.57, 95% CI = -2.33-9.47, p = 0.24) between groups.

CONCLUSION

In older patients, tolvaptan relieves WRF, reduces the hospitalization period, and increases urine volume without significant effects on blood pressure. However, surprisingly, the use of tolvaptan did not influence 6‑month all-cause mortality.

The effects of tolvaptan dose on cardiac mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure after hospital discharge

Tolvaptan (TLV) is a newly developed oral vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist that is mostly used for patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) refractory to conventional diuretic therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of outpatient TLV dose on cardiac mortality in patients discharged after hospitalization for ADHF. One hundred and five patients with ADHF who had been treated with TLV for the first time during hospitalization were retrospectively divided into three groups based on outpatient TLV use and dose. The non-TLV group comprised patients who were not treated with TLV after discharge (n = 36). Patients who continued TLV after discharge were further classified into two groups: low-dose (LD)-TLV (3.75 mg/day, n = 27) and high-dose (HD)-TLV (7.5 or 15 mg/day, n = 42). The primary endpoint was cardiac mortality. Secondary endpoint included the composite of all-cause mortality or re-hospitalization due to worsening of ADHF. There were no significant differences in demographic variables other than body mass index (p = 0.0026), echocardiographic data, laboratory data other than serum chloride before TLV administration (p = 0.041), serum sodium (p = 0.040) and potassium (p = 0.027) at discharge, and concomitant medications among the three groups. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the survival rate was lower in HD-TLV than in non-TLV, whereas LD-TLV showed the highest survival rate among the three groups (p = 0.0001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis of the clinical characteristics used for predicting cardiac mortality revealed that LD-TLV (hazard ratio [HR] 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.93, p = 0.040) and HD-TLV (HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.06-6.26, p = 0.035) were significant predictors after adjustment for predictive covariates. In conclusion, the judgement of the continuation of LD-TLV according to patient hemodynamics and severity of congestion may not cause worsened prognosis.

Effects of Additive Tolvaptan vs. Increased Furosemide on Heart Failure With Diuretic Resistance and Renal Impairment - Results From the K-STAR Study

BACKGROUND

Although diuretic resistance leading to residual congestion is a known predictor of a poorer heart failure (HF) prognosis, better therapeutic strategies for effective and safe decongestion have not been established.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, 81 HF patients with fluid retention (despite taking ≥40 mg/day furosemide (FUR)), with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, were randomized into 2 groups and administered either ≤15 mg/day additive tolvaptan (TLV) or ≤40 mg/day increased FUR for 7 days. Changes in urine volume between baseline and mean urine volume during treatment were significantly higher in the TLV than FUR group (P=0.0003). Although there was no significant decrease in body weight or improved signs and symptoms of congestion between the 2 groups, the increase in serum creatinine on Day 7 from baseline was significantly smaller in the TLV than FUR group (P=0.038). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that additive TLV (odds ratio 0.157, 95% confidence interval 0.043-0.605, P=0.001) was an independent clinical factor for improved renal function during treatment compared with increased FUR.

CONCLUSIONS

In HF patients with residual congestion and renal dysfunction refractory to standard therapy, additive TLV increased urine volume without further renal impairment compared with patients who received an increased dose of FUR.

Effectiveness and safety of tolvaptan in liver cirrhosis patients with edema: Interim results of post-marketing surveillance of tolvaptan in liver cirrhosis (START study)

AIM

Loop diuretics and spironolactone are used in patients with hepatic edema, but they are sometimes associated with insufficient responses as well as adverse events. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin type 2 receptor antagonist, was approved for hepatic edema in 2013. A large-scale post-marketing surveillance study has been carried out to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tolvaptan in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS

Patients with hepatic cirrhosis with insufficient response to conventional diuretics were enrolled. The observational period was up to 6 months. Changes in body weight and clinical symptoms were measured to evaluate effectiveness. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was summarized as a safety measure.

RESULTS

Of 970 patients enrolled, 463 were included in the safety analysis. Of this group, 340 were included in the effectiveness analysis. Decreases in body weight from baseline were -2.38 kg on day 7 and -3.52 kg on day 14. Ascites and bloated feeling was significantly improved within 14 days. The mean change in body weight depended on estimated glomerular filtration rate levels. The most frequently reported adverse drug reaction was thirst (6.9% of patients). Serum sodium level of ≥146 mEq/L was observed in 12 patients (2.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world clinical setting, tolvaptan showed aquaretic effectiveness in patients with cirrhosis. The mean change in body weight depended on renal function. We recommend tolvaptan use for hepatic cirrhosis at a stage in which the renal function is maintained.