1
|
Stochastic model of ERK-mediated progesterone receptor translocation, clustering and transcriptional activity. Sci Rep 2022; 12:11791. [PMID: 35821038 PMCID: PMC9276744 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13821-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Progesterone receptor (PR) transcriptional activity is a key factor in the differentiation of the uterine endometrium. By consequence, progestin has been identified as an important treatment modality for endometrial cancer. PR transcriptional activity is controlled by extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) mediated phosphorylation, downstream of growth factor receptors such as EGFR. However, phosphorylation of PR also targets it for ubiquitination and destruction in the proteasome. Quantitative studies of these opposing roles are much needed toward validation of potential new progestin-based therapeutics. In this work, we propose a spatial stochastic model to study the effects of the opposing roles for PR phosphorylation on the levels of active transcription factor. Our numerical simulations confirm earlier in vitro experiments in endometrial cancer cell lines, identifying clustering as a mechanism that amplifies the ability of progesterone receptors to influence gene transcription. We additionally show the usefulness of a statistical method we developed to quantify and control variations in stochastic simulations in general biochemical systems, assisting modelers in defining minimal but meaningful numbers of simulations while guaranteeing outputs remain within a pre-defined confidence level.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bain DL, De Angelis RW, Connaghan KD, Yang Q, Degala GD, Lambert JR. Dissecting Steroid Receptor Function by Analytical Ultracentrifugation. Methods Enzymol 2015; 562:363-89. [PMID: 26412661 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Steroid receptors comprise a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The members include the androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and progesterone receptor (PR). Each receptor controls distinct sets of genes associated with development, metabolism, and homeostasis. Although a qualitative understanding of how individual receptors mediate gene expression has come into focus, quantitative insight remains less clear. As a step toward delineating the physical mechanisms by which individual receptors activate their target genes, we have carried out a systematic dissection of receptor interaction energetics with their multisite regulatory elements. Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) has proved indispensable in these studies, in part by revealing the energetics of receptor self-association and its thermodynamic coupling to DNA binding. Here, we discuss these findings in the context of understanding specificity of receptor-mediated gene control. We first highlight the role of sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium in addressing receptor assembly state, and present a comparative analysis across the receptor family. We then use these results for understanding how receptors assemble at multisite regulatory elements, and hypothesize how these findings might play a role in receptor-specific gene regulation. Finally, we examine receptor behavior in a cellular context, with a view toward linking our in vitro studies with in vivo function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| | - Rolando W De Angelis
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Qin Yang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Gregory D Degala
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - James R Lambert
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bernardo TJ, Dubrovskaya VA, Xie X, Dubrovsky EB. A view through a chromatin loop: insights into the ecdysone activation of early genes in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:10409-24. [PMID: 25143532 PMCID: PMC4176353 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The early genes are a key group of ecdysone targets that function at the top of the signaling hierarchy. In the presence of ecdysone, early genes exhibit a highly characteristic rapid and powerful induction that represents a primary response. Multiple isoforms encoded by early genes then coordinate the activation of a larger group of late genes. While the general mechanism of ecdysone-dependent transcription is well characterized, it is not known whether a distinct mechanism governs the hormonal response of early genes. We previously found that one of the Drosophila early genes, E75, harbors multiple functional ecdysone response elements (EcREs). In this study we extended the analysis to Broad and E74 and found that EcRE multiplicity is a general feature of the early genes. Since most of the EcREs within early gene loci are situated distantly from promoters, we employed the chromosome conformation capture method to determine whether higher order chromatin structure facilitates hormonal activation. For each early gene we detected chromatin loops that juxtapose their promoters and multiple distant EcREs prior to ecdysone activation. Our findings suggest that higher order chromatin structure may serve as an important mechanism underlying the distinct response of early genes to ecdysone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis J Bernardo
- Department of Biology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458, USA Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | | | - Xie Xie
- Department of Biology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458, USA
| | - Edward B Dubrovsky
- Department of Biology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458, USA Center for Cancer, Genetic Diseases, and Gene Regulation, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Connaghan KD, Yang Q, Miura MT, Moody AD, Bain DL. Homologous steroid receptors assemble at identical promoter architectures with unique energetics of cooperativity. Proteins 2014; 82:2078-87. [PMID: 24648119 DOI: 10.1002/prot.24563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2014] [Revised: 03/05/2014] [Accepted: 03/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Steroid receptors comprise a homologous family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The receptors bind largely identical response elements in vitro, yet regulate distinct gene networks in vivo. This paradox raises the issue of how transcriptional specificity is achieved, particularly if multiple receptor populations are competing for identical sites. Noting that receptor-DNA energetics are a primary force in driving transcriptional activity, differences in interaction energetics among the receptors might underlie receptor-specific transcriptional control. Thermodynamic dissections support this premise-upon assembling at an identical promoter architecture, individual receptors exhibit vast differences in cooperative and self-association energetics. More intriguingly, these parameters distribute in a way that mirrors the evolutionary divergence of the steroid receptor family. For example, the closely related progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors (PR and GR) display little or no self-association but strong intersite cooperativity, whereas the more distantly related estrogen receptor (ER-α) shows inverse behavior. These findings suggest that receptors view genomic promoter architectures as a collection of affinity landscapes; receptors select from this landscape via their unique interaction energetics. To test this idea, we analyzed the cooperative binding energetics of the above three receptors using an array of promoters. We find that cooperativity is not only receptor-specific but also highly promoter-specific. Thus PR shows maximal cooperativity at promoters with closely spaced and in phase binding sites. GR cooperativity is maintained over greater distances, is larger energetically, and shows markedly different phase dependency. Finally, ER-α appears incapable of cooperativity regardless of promoter architecture, consistent with its more distant phylogeny.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80045
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bain DL, Connaghan KD, Maluf NK, Yang Q, Miura MT, De Angelis RW, Degala GD, Lambert JR. Steroid receptor-DNA interactions: toward a quantitative connection between energetics and transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 42:691-700. [PMID: 24064251 PMCID: PMC3902896 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Steroid receptors comprise an evolutionarily conserved family of transcription factors. Although the qualitative aspects by which individual receptors regulate transcription are well understood, a quantitative perspective is less clear. This is primarily because receptor function is considerably more complex than that of classical regulatory factors such as phage or bacterial repressors. Here we discuss recent advances in placing receptor-specific transcriptional regulation on a more quantitative footing, specifically focusing on the role of macromolecular interaction energetics. We first highlight limitations and challenges associated with traditional approaches for assessing the role of energetics (more specifically, binding affinity) with functional outcomes such as transcriptional activation. We next demonstrate how rigorous in vitro measurements and straightforward interaction models quantitatively relate energetics to transcriptional activity within the cell, and follow by discussing why such an approach is unexpectedly effective in explaining complex functional behavior. Finally, we examine the implications of these findings for considering the unique gene regulatory properties of the individual receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA and Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
De Angelis RW, Yang Q, Miura MT, Bain DL. Dissection of androgen receptor-promoter interactions: steroid receptors partition their interaction energetics in parallel with their phylogenetic divergence. J Mol Biol 2013; 425:4223-35. [PMID: 23917122 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2013] [Revised: 07/23/2013] [Accepted: 07/25/2013] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Steroid receptors comprise a homologous family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The members include androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and progesterone receptor (PR). Phylogenetic studies demonstrate that AR, GR, MR, and PR are most closely related, falling into subgroup 3C. ER is more distantly related, falling into subgroup 3A. To determine the quantitative basis by which receptors generate their unique transcriptional responses, we are systematically dissecting the promoter-binding energetics of all receptors under a single "standard state" condition. Here, we examine the self-assembly and promoter-binding energetics of full-length AR and a mutant associated with prostate cancer, T877A. We first demonstrate that both proteins exist only as monomers, showing no evidence of dimerization. Although this result contradicts the traditional understanding that steroid receptors dimerize in the absence of DNA, it is fully consistent with our previous work demonstrating that GR and two PR isoforms either do not dimerize or dimerize only weakly. Moreover, both AR proteins exhibit substantial cooperativity between binding sites, again as seen for GR and PR. In sharp contrast, the more distantly related ER-α dimerizes so strongly that energetics can only be measured indirectly, yet cooperativity is negligible. Thus, homologous receptors partition their promoter-binding energetics quite differently. Moreover, since receptors most closely related by phylogeny partition their energetics similarly, such partitioning appears to be evolutionarily conserved. We speculate that such differences in energetics, coupled with different promoter architectures, serve as the basis for generating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolando W De Angelis
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Knutsen GR, Brown MD, Ruest LB. Control of endothelin-a receptor expression by progesterone is enhanced by synergy with Gata2. Mol Endocrinol 2013; 27:892-908. [PMID: 23592430 PMCID: PMC3656236 DOI: 10.1210/me.2012-1334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2012] [Accepted: 04/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The endothelin-A receptor (Ednra) is involved in several physiological, pathological, and developmental pathways. Known for its function in vasoconstriction after being activated by endothelin-1, Ednra also controls cephalic neural crest cell development and appears to play a role in several pathologies, including cancer and periodontitis. However, the mechanisms regulating Ednra expression have not been identified despite its important functions. In this study, we investigated the role progesterone plays in Ednra gene expression in vivo and in vitro. In mice, pregnancy promotes Ednra expression in the heart, kidney, lung, uterus, and placenta, and the up-regulation is mediated by progesterone. We determined that the conserved region between -5.7 and -4.2 kb upstream of the mouse Ednra gene is necessary for the progesterone response. We also found that progesterone mediates Ednra activation through progesterone receptor B activation by its recruitment to PRE6, one of the 6 progesterone response elements found in that locus. However, gene activation by means of a GATA2 site was also necessary for the progesterone response. The Gata2 transcription factor enhances the progesterone response mediated by the progesterone receptor B. Together these results indicate that progesterone regulates Ednra expression by synergizing with Gata2 activity, a previously unknown mechanism. This mechanism may have an impact on pathologies involving the endothelin signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanping Zhang
- Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University-Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jacobsen BM, Horwitz KB. Progesterone receptors, their isoforms and progesterone regulated transcription. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 357:18-29. [PMID: 21952082 PMCID: PMC3272316 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2011] [Revised: 08/11/2011] [Accepted: 09/11/2011] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
This review discusses mechanisms by which progesterone receptors (PR) regulate transcription. We examine available data in different species and tissues regarding: (1) regulation of PR levels; and (2) expression profiling of progestin-regulated genes by total PRs, or their PRA and PRB isoforms. (3) We address current views about the composition of progesterone response elements, and postulate that PR monomers acting through "half-site" elements are common, entailing cooperativity with neighboring DNA-bound transcription factors. (4) We summarize transcription data for multiple progestin-regulated promoters as directed by total PR, or PRA vs. PRB. We conclude that current models and methods used to study PR function are problematical, and recommend that future work employ cells and receptors appropriate to the species, focusing on analyses of the effects of endogenous receptors targeting endogenous genes in native chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britta M Jacobsen
- Department of Medicine/Endocrinology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bain DL, Yang Q, Connaghan KD, Robblee JP, Miura MT, Degala GD, Lambert JR, Maluf NK. Glucocorticoid receptor-DNA interactions: binding energetics are the primary determinant of sequence-specific transcriptional activity. J Mol Biol 2012; 422:18-32. [PMID: 22698871 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2012] [Revised: 05/31/2012] [Accepted: 06/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a member of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. A long-standing question has focused on how GR and other receptors precisely control gene expression. One difficulty in addressing this is that GR function is influenced by multiple factors including ligand and coactivator levels, chromatin state, and allosteric coupling. Moreover, the receptor recognizes an array of DNA sequences that generate a range of transcriptional activities. Such complexity suggests that any single parameter-DNA binding affinity, for example-is unlikely to be a dominant contributor to function. Indeed, a number of studies have suggested that for GR and other receptors, binding affinity toward different DNA sequences is poorly correlated with transcriptional activity. As a step toward determining the factors most predictive of GR function, we rigorously examined the relationship between in vitro GR-DNA binding energetics and in vivo transcriptional activity. We first demonstrate that previous approaches for assessing affinity-function relationships are problematic due to issues of data transformation and linearization. Thus, the conclusion that binding energetics and transcriptional activity are poorly correlated is premature. Using more appropriate analyses, we find that energetics and activity are in fact highly correlated. Furthermore, this correlation can be quantitatively accounted for using simple binding models. Finally, we show that the strong relationship between energetics and transcriptional activity is recapitulated in multiple promoter contexts, cell lines, and chromatin environments. Thus, despite the complexity of GR function, DNA binding energetics are the primary determinant of sequence-specific transcriptional activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Bain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Robblee JP, Miura MT, Bain DL. Glucocorticoid receptor-promoter interactions: energetic dissection suggests a framework for the specificity of steroid receptor-mediated gene regulation. Biochemistry 2012; 51:4463-72. [PMID: 22587663 DOI: 10.1021/bi3003956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a member of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. A number of studies have shown that steroid receptors regulate distinct but overlapping sets of genes; however, the molecular basis for such specificity remains unclear. Previous work from our laboratory has demonstrated that under identical solution conditions, three other steroid receptors [the progesterone receptor A isoform (PR-A), the progesterone receptor B isoform (PR-B), and estrogen receptor α (ER-α)] differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics. For example, PR-A and PR-B generate similar dimerization free energies but differ significantly in their extents of intersite cooperativity. Conversely, ER-α maintains an intersite cooperativity most comparable to that of PR-A yet dimerizes with an affinity orders of magnitude greater than that of either of the PR isoforms. We have speculated that these differences serve to generate receptor-specific promoter occupancies, and thus receptor-specific gene regulation. Noting that GR regulates a unique subset of genes relative to the other receptors, we hypothesized that the receptor should maintain a unique set of interaction energetics. We rigorously determined the self-association and promoter binding energetics of full-length, human GR under conditions identical to those used in our earlier studies. We find that unlike all other receptors, GR shows no evidence of reversible self-association. Moreover, GR assembles with strong intersite cooperativity comparable to that seen only for PR-B. Finally, simulations show that such partitioning of interaction energetics allows for receptor-specific promoter occupancies, even under conditions where multiple receptors are competing for binding at identical sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Robblee
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abdel-Hafiz HA, Horwitz KB. Control of progesterone receptor transcriptional synergy by SUMOylation and deSUMOylation. BMC Mol Biol 2012; 13:10. [PMID: 22439847 PMCID: PMC3373386 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-13-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2011] [Accepted: 03/22/2012] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Covalent modification of nuclear receptors by the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) is dynamically regulated by competing conjugation/deconjugation steps that modulate their overall transcriptional activity. SUMO conjugation of progesterone receptors (PRs) at the N-terminal lysine (K) 388 residue of PR-B is hormone-dependent and suppresses PR-dependent transcription. Mutation of the SUMOylation motif promotes transcriptional synergy. Results The present studies address mechanisms underlying this transcriptional synergy by using SUMOylation deficient PR mutants and PR specifically deSUMOylated by Sentrin-specific proteases (SENPs). We show that deSUMOylation of a small pool of receptors by catalytically competent SENPs globally modulates the cooperativity-driven transcriptional synergy between PR observed on exogenous promoters containing at least two progesterone-response elements (PRE2). This occurs in part by raising PR sensitivity to ligands. The C-terminal ligand binding domain of PR is required for the transcriptional stimulatory effects of N-terminal deSUMOylation, but neither a functional PR dimerization interface, nor a DNA binding domain exhibiting PR specificity, are required. Conclusion We conclude that direct and reversible SUMOylation of a minor PR protein subpopulation tightly controls the overall transcriptional activity of the receptors at complex synthetic promoters. Transcriptional synergism controlled by SENP-dependent PR deSUMOylation is dissociable from MAPK-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation, from SRC-1 coactivation and from recruitment of histone deacetylases to promoters. This will provide more information for targeting PR as a part of hormonal therapy of breast cancer. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the SUMOylation/deSUMOylation pathway is an interesting target for therapeutic treatment of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hany A Abdel-Hafiz
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hill KK, Roemer SC, Churchill ME, Edwards DP. Structural and functional analysis of domains of the progesterone receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 348:418-29. [PMID: 21803119 PMCID: PMC4437577 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2011] [Revised: 06/29/2011] [Accepted: 07/07/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Steroid hormone receptors are multi-domain proteins composed of conserved well-structured regions, such as ligand (LBD) and DNA binding domains (DBD), plus other naturally unstructured regions including the amino-terminal domain (NTD) and the hinge region between the LBD and DBD. The hinge is more than just a flexible region between the DBD and LBD and is capable of binding co-regulatory proteins and the minor groove of DNA flanking hormone response elements. Because the hinge can directly participate in DNA binding it has also been termed the carboxyl terminal extension (CTE) of the DNA binding domain. The CTE and NTD are dynamic regions of the receptor that can adopt multiple conformations depending on the environment of interacting proteins and DNA. Both regions have important regulatory roles for multiple receptor functions that are related to the ability of the CTE and NTD to form multiple active conformations. This review focuses on studies of the CTE and NTD of progesterone receptor (PR), as well as related work with other steroid/nuclear receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista K. Hill
- Department of Immunology, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO 80206, USA
| | - Sarah C. Roemer
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Mair E.A. Churchill
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Dean P. Edwards
- Departments of Molecular & Cellular Biology and Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moody AD, Miura MT, Connaghan KD, Bain DL. Thermodynamic dissection of estrogen receptor-promoter interactions reveals that steroid receptors differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics. Biochemistry 2012; 51:739-49. [PMID: 22201220 DOI: 10.1021/bi2017156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Steroid receptors define a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent work has demonstrated that the receptors regulate distinct but overlapping gene networks, yet the mechanisms by which they do so remain unclear. We previously determined the microscopic binding energetics for progesterone receptor (PR) isoform assembly at promoters containing multiple response elements. We found that the two isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) share nearly identical dimerization and intrinsic DNA binding free energies but maintain large differences in cooperative free energy. Moreover, cooperativity can be modulated by monovalent ion binding and promoter layout, suggesting that differences in cooperativity might control isoform-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor function. To determine whether cooperative binding energetics are common to other members of the steroid receptor family, we dissected the thermodynamics of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α):promoter interactions. We find that the ER-α intrinsic DNA binding free energy is identical to that of the PR isoforms. This was expected, noting that receptor DNA binding domains are highly conserved. Unexpectedly, ER-α generates negligible cooperativity-orders of magnitude less than predicted based on our studies of the PR isoforms. However, analysis of the cooperativity term suggests that it reflects a balance between highly favorable cooperative stabilization and unfavorable promoter bending. Moreover, ER-α cooperative free energy is compensated for by a large increase in dimerization free energy. Collectively, the results demonstrate that steroid receptors differentially partition not only cooperative energetics but also dimerization energetics. We speculate that this ability serves as a framework for regulating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor-specific gene regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amie D Moody
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Moody AD, Robblee JP, Bain DL. Dissecting the linkage between transcription factor self-assembly and site-specific DNA binding: the role of the analytical ultracentrifuge. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 796:187-204. [PMID: 22052491 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-334-9_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
A long-standing goal of biomedical research has been to determine the quantitative mechanisms responsible for gene regulation and transcriptional activation. These events occur through numerous protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, many of which are allosterically coupled. For systems where highly purified protein is available, analytical ultracentrifugation provides a means to study these linked reactions, allosteric or otherwise. Sedimentation velocity is an ultracentrifugation technique that provides rigorous insight into protein self-association, homogeneity, and gross structure. Because self-association is often in dynamic equilibrium with other reactions such as DNA binding, an explicit and independent analysis of each interaction is critical to revealing mechanism. This chapter details a protocol for using sedimentation velocity to dissect the linkage between transcription factor self-association and site-specific DNA binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amie D Moody
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Connaghan KD, Moody AD, Robblee JP, Lambert JR, Bain DL. From steroid receptors to cytokines: the thermodynamics of self-associating systems. Biophys Chem 2011; 159:24-32. [PMID: 21696881 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2011.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2011] [Revised: 04/19/2011] [Accepted: 04/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Since 1987, the Gibbs Conference on Biothermodynamics has maintained a focus on understanding the quantitative aspects of gene regulatory systems. These studies coupled rigorous techniques with exact theory to dissect the linked reactions associated with bacterial and lower eukaryotic gene regulation. However, only in the last ten years has it become possible to apply this approach to clinically relevant, human gene regulatory systems. Here we summarize our work on the thermodynamics of human steroid receptors and their interactions with multi-site promoter sequences, highlighting results not available from more traditional biochemical and structural approaches. Noting that the Gibbs Conference has also served as a vehicle to promote the broader use of thermodynamics in understanding biology, we then discuss collaborative work on the hydrodynamics of a cytokine implicated in tumor suppression, prostate derived factor (PDF).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Connaghan KD, Heneghan AF, Miura MT, Bain DL. Na(+) and K(+) allosterically regulate cooperative DNA binding by the human progesterone receptor. Biochemistry 2010; 49:422-31. [PMID: 20000807 DOI: 10.1021/bi901525m] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cooperativity is a common mechanism used by transcription factors to generate highly responsive yet stable gene regulation. For the two isoforms of human progesterone receptor (PR-A and PR-B), differences in cooperative DNA binding energetics may account for their differing transcriptional activation properties. Here we report on the molecular origins responsible for cooperativity, finding that it can be activated or repressed with Na(+) and K(+), respectively. We demonstrate that PR self-association and DNA-dependent cooperativity are linked to a monovalent cation binding event and that this binding is coupled to modulation of receptor structure. K(+) and Na(+) are therefore allosteric effectors of PR function. Noting that the apparent binding affinities of Na(+) and K(+) are comparable to their intracellular concentrations and that PR isoforms directly regulate the genes of a number of ion pumps and channels, these results suggest that Na(+) and K(+) may additionally function as physiological regulators of PR action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
A theoretical framework for gene induction and experimental comparisons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:7107-12. [PMID: 20351279 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911095107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ligand-mediated gene induction by steroid receptors is a multistep process characterized by a dose-response curve for gene product that follows a first-order Hill equation. This behavior has classically been explained by steroid binding to receptor being the rate-limiting step. However, this predicts a constant potency of gene induction (EC(50)) for a given receptor-steroid complex, which is challenged by the findings that various cofactors/reagents can alter this parameter in a gene-specific manner. These properties put strong constraints on the mechanisms of gene induction and raise two questions: How can a first-order Hill dose-response curve (FHDC) arise from a multistep reaction sequence, and how do cofactors modify potency? Here we introduce a theoretical framework in which a sequence of steps yields an FHDC for the final product as a function of the initial agonist concentration. An exact determination of all constants is not required to describe the final FHDC. The theory predicts mechanisms for cofactor/reagent effects on gene-induction potency and maximal activity and it assigns a relative order to cofactors in the sequence of steps. The theory is supported by several observations from glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene induction. It identifies the mechanism and matches the measured dose-response curves for different concentrations of the combination of cofactor Ubc9 and receptor. It also predicts that an FHDC cannot involve the DNA binding of preformed receptor dimers, which is validated experimentally. The theory is general and can be applied to any biochemical reaction that shows an FHDC.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Progesterone receptors (PRs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. The mechanisms by which receptors such as PR assemble at a promoter and recruit coactivators are well understood at the biochemical level. However, a rigorous and thus quantitatively predictive understanding of function is entirely lacking. This is so in part because the study of receptor function has largely been carried out using semiquantitative or qualitative approaches. These types of analyses are limited in their ability to resolve thermodynamically valid and physically meaningful microscopic interaction parameters. This includes resolution of intrinsic binding constants and cooperativity terms, as well as the mathematical framework for integrating these values into a larger molecular code for function. Here we present our experimental and theoretical approach for dissecting the linked reactions associated with PR and coactivator assembly at complex promoter sequences. We discuss the use of analytical ultracentrifugation and quantitative DNase footprint titration and their coupling to exact theoretical treatments. We then highlight the major findings of these studies and their implications for understanding and reevaluating receptor function.
Collapse
|
19
|
Jacobsen BM, Jambal P, Schittone SA, Horwitz KB. ALU repeats in promoters are position-dependent co-response elements (coRE) that enhance or repress transcription by dimeric and monomeric progesterone receptors. Mol Endocrinol 2009; 23:989-1000. [PMID: 19372234 DOI: 10.1210/me.2009-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We have conducted an in silico analysis of progesterone response elements (PRE) in progesterone receptor (PR) up-regulated promoters. Imperfect inverted repeats, direct repeats, and half-site PRE are widespread, not only in PR-regulated, but also in non-PR-regulated and random promoters. Few resemble the commonly used palindromic PRE with three nucleotide (nt) spacers. We speculated that PRE may be necessary but insufficient to control endogenous PR-dependent transcription. A search for PRE partners identified a highly conserved 234-nt sequence invariably located within 1-2 kb of transcription start sites. It resembles ALU repeats and contains binding sites for 11 transcription factors. The 234-nt sequence of the PR-regulated 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase promoter was cloned in the forward or reverse orientation in front of zero, one, or two inverted repeat PRE, and one or tandem PRE half-sites, driving luciferase. Under these conditions the 234-nt sequence functions as a co-response element (coRE). From the PRE or tandem half-sites, the reverse coRE is a strong activator of PR and glucocorticoid receptor-dependent transcription. The forward coRE is a powerful repressor. The prevalence of PRE half-sites in natural promoters suggested that PR monomers regulate transcription. Indeed, dimerization-domain mutant PR monomers were stronger transactivators than wild-type PR on PRE or tandem half-sites. This was repressed by the forward coRE. We propose that in natural promoters the coRE functions as a composite response element with imperfect PRE and half-sites to present variable, orientation-dependent transcription factors for interaction with nearby PR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britta M Jacobsen
- Department of Medicine/Endocrinology, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang JB, Pan ZX, Lin F, Ma XS, Liu HL. [Biochemical methods for the analysis of DNA-protein interactions]. YI CHUAN = HEREDITAS 2009; 31:325-336. [PMID: 19273448 DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2009.00325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Investigation of DNA-protein interactions is fundamental to understand the mechanism underlying a variety of life processes. In this article, various types of biochemical methods in DNA-protein interaction study in vivo and in vitro at the level of DNA, protein, and the complex, respectively were briefly reviewed. Traditional assays including Nitrocellulose filter-binding assay, Footprinting, EMSA, and Southwestern blotting were summarized. In addition, chromatin immunoprecipitation techniques including nChIP, xChIP, and ChIP-on-chip, which were widely used in epigenetics, were particularly introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Bi Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Connaghan-Jones KD, Moody AD, Bain DL. Quantitative DNase footprint titration: a tool for analyzing the energetics of protein-DNA interactions. Nat Protoc 2008; 3:900-14. [PMID: 18451798 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
A major goal in biomedical research is to determine the mechanisms responsible for gene regulation. However, the promoters and operators that control transcription are often complex in nature, containing multiple-binding sites with which DNA-binding proteins can interact cooperatively. Quantitative DNase footprint titration is one of the few techniques capable of resolving the microscopic binding affinities responsible for the macroscopic assembly process. Here, we present a step-by-step protocol for carrying out a footprint titration experiment. We then describe how to quantify the resultant images to generate individual-site binding curves. Finally, we derive basic equations for binding at each site and present an overview of the fitting process, applying it to the anticipated results. Users should anticipate that the footprinting experiment will take 3-5 d starting from DNA template isolation to image acquisition and quantitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith D Connaghan-Jones
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|