1
|
Allison BA, Glodowski CR, Smith C, Mizelle C, Leiva H, Wright ST, Golin C, Arora KS, Schilling S. Effectiveness of interventions to support person-centered contraceptive care for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025:S0002-9378(25)00162-0. [PMID: 40120733 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2025] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between interventions to support adolescent and young adult person-centered contraceptive counseling and the delivery of person-centered contraceptive counseling, and their impact on clinician and patient outcomes. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature via EBSCO, Embase.com, PsycInfo via EBSCO, and Scopus searched on March 31, 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Published from March 2011 to present, included patients assigned female at birth and <25 years, studied interventions that operationalized aspects of person-centered contraceptive counseling, and had patient or clinician outcomes related to person-centered contraceptive counseling (eg, direct measurement of person-centered contraceptive counseling, knowledge, confidence, and contraceptive decision-making). All study designs with primary data collection were included except case studies/series. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Search results were downloaded to EndNote, and duplicates were removed. References were uploaded to Covidence Systematic Review software. Two authors independently screened the studies using the eligibility criteria by title and abstract then full-text review. Relevant information was extracted independently by 2 authors. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus discussion. Data included study sample demographic characteristics, methodological characteristics, intervention and comparator descriptions, and outcome measures. We then determined risk of bias for individual studies and strength of evidence by included outcomes. RESULTS Of 5611 unique titles and abstracts, 12 studies met eligibility criteria. Four were pre/post studies, 2 were randomized controlled trials, and 6 were observational. These studies evaluated interventions including contraceptive coaching, decision aids, and clinician counseling prompts. No studies directly assessed person-centered contraceptive counseling using validated measures. All studies reported improvements in contraception-related secondary patient and clinician outcomes in the short and medium term. Patient outcomes included the following: continuation, choice, knowledge, perceived benefits, quality of care, and self-efficacy. Clinician outcomes included the following: comfort, knowledge, quality of care, and perceived benefits. Most studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION While interventions to support person-centered contraceptive counseling may improve patient and clinician outcomes, none of the studies directly measured person-centered contraceptive counseling or assessed preferred method use or reproductive autonomy as outcomes. The results were integrated into a Socioecological Model of Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling and Care to diagram relationships between interventions, delivery of person-centered contraceptive counseling, and secondary outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca A Allison
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | | | - Cambray Smith
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Celia Mizelle
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Pediatrics Residency, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hailey Leiva
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Sarah Towner Wright
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Carol Golin
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC; University of North Carolina's Center for AIDS Research, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kavita Shah Arora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Samantha Schilling
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hillard PJA. Sexual and Reproductive Health in the United States, 2024: How will you vote? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2024; 37:99-101. [PMID: 38575236 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
|
3
|
Allison BA, Yates L, Tadikonda A, Arora KS, Stuart GS. Single-Visit Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation Among Adolescents Before and During COVID-19. J Adolesc Health 2024; 74:367-374. [PMID: 37815761 PMCID: PMC10810361 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is cost-effective and convenient. Our objective was to compare incidence of single-visit LARC placement and associated factors during the year before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 15, 2020) and the first year of the pandemic. METHODS This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records from a large healthcare system. Eligible adolescents were aged 10-19 years and received outpatient LARC from March 15, 2019 to March 14, 2021. Logistic regression models determined the relationship of patient and provider characteristics on single-visit LARC before and during COVID-19. RESULTS One thousand six adolescents initiated LARC during the study period. Fewer adolescents received single-visit LARC during COVID-19 (289/506, 57.1%) compared to before (315/500, 63.0%), although changes in odds of single-visit LARC were not statistically significant. Concordance between county of patient residence and the location of the LARC placement facility was associated with single-visit LARC before (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.75) and during (aOR = 1.74) the pandemic (both p < .05). During the pandemic, a few factors were associated with reduced odds of single-visit LARC: (1) public insurance (aOR = 0.49, p < .01), (2) nonobstetricians/nongynecologists providers (pediatrics [aOR = 0.35, p < .01], family medicine [aOR = 0.53, p < .01], or internal medicine [aOR = 0.14, p < .05]), and (3) advanced practice practitioners (aOR = 0.49, p < .01). DISCUSSION Incidence of single-visit LARC was similar before and during the pandemic. Certain factors were associated with lower odds of single-visit LARC insertion, suggesting differential access during the pandemic for subgroups of adolescents. Our findings may guide policy and programmatic interventions to improve access to single-visit LARC for all adolescent populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca A Allison
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Lindsey Yates
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Center of Excellence, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ananya Tadikonda
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kavita Shah Arora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Gretchen S Stuart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferat RM, Haddad LB, Westhoff CL, Hubacher D. Recap of the sixth international symposium on intrauterine devices and systems for women's health. Contraception 2022; 116:14-21. [PMID: 35882359 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Sixth International Symposium on Intrauterine Devices and Systems for Women's Health was held as a series of seven 2-hour webinars between May 28, 2020, and June 22, 2021. This Symposium featured 48 different presenters and moderators covering a wide range of topics to highlight new IUD issues and update general IUD knowledge, just as it was done in previous symposia dating back to 1962 [1-5]. A total of 1346 people attended remotely to observe the events live. In this article, we share summaries of the presentations from the sixth symposium. These summaries, provided by the presenters, are meant to archive the symposium. This article gives the reader an overview of the topics and identifies the sessions' moderators and speakers charged with providing the content. Those interested in further detail, references, and information about the speakers can find more information on the conference website: www.iud2020.com. After the summaries, we share ideas for future IUD research and programmatic needs, as provided by Symposium's presenters and organizers. The authors' summaries are personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the perspectives of the Symposium's organizers or the medical community at large. The Symposium was recorded and the sessions are available for viewing free of charge at the website, www.iud2020.comor on YouTube. As of July 2022, approximately 1700 visitors have viewed the recordings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Ferat
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Lisa B Haddad
- Population Council, Center for Biomedical Research, NY, USA
| | | | | | -
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fu TC, Rosenberg M, Golzarri-Arroyo L, Fortenberry JD, Herbenick D. Relationships between Penile-Vaginal Intercourse Frequency and Condom/Contraceptive Use from 2009 to 2018: Findings from the National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR SEXUAL HEALTH 2022; 34:716-727. [PMID: 37008894 PMCID: PMC10062058 DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2022.2132340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To examine changes over time in event-level condom/contraceptive use and the association between past year penile-vaginal intercourse frequency and event-level condom/contraceptive use. Methods Data were from the 2009 and 2018 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior, an online probability survey of U.S. adolescents and adults. Results Use of condoms and highly effective hormonal contraceptives decreased while long-acting reversible contraceptive use increased from 2009 to 2018 among adults. Increased penile-vaginal intercourse frequency was associated with decreased use of most contraceptive methods but an increase in condom use for adolescents. Conclusions Sexual frequency should be considered when assessing condom/contraceptive use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-chieh Fu
- Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Molly Rosenberg
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | | | - J. Dennis Fortenberry
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Debby Herbenick
- Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sullivan EE, Love HL, Fisher RL, Schlitt JJ, Cook EL, Soleimanpour S. Access to Contraceptives in School-Based Health Centers: Progress and Opportunities. Am J Prev Med 2022; 62:350-359. [PMID: 34922786 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The U.S. has a higher adolescent pregnancy rate than other industrialized countries. School-based health centers can improve access to contraceptives among youth, which can prevent unplanned pregnancies. This cross-sectional study examines the characteristics and predictors of contraceptive provision at school-based health centers in 2016-2017 and changes in and barriers to provision between 2001 and 2017. METHODS In 2020-2021, the authors conducted analyses of the National School-Based Health Care Census data collected from 2001 to 2017. The primary outcome of interest was whether adolescent-serving school-based health centers dispense contraceptives, and a secondary outcome of interest was the policies that prohibit school-based health centers from dispensing contraceptives. A multivariate regression analysis examined the associations between contraceptive provision and various covariates, including geographic region, years of operation, and provider team composition. RESULTS Less than half of adolescent-serving school-based health centers reported providing contraceptives on site. Those that provided contraceptives were more likely located in the Western and Northeastern regions of the U.S., older in terms of years of operation, and staffed by a wide variety of health provider types. Among school-based health centers that experienced policy barriers to providing access to contraceptive methods, most attributed the source to the school or school district where the school-based health center was located. CONCLUSIONS School-based health centers are an evidence-based model for providing contraceptives to adolescents but not enough are providing direct access. Understanding the predictors, characteristics, and barriers influencing the provision of contraceptives at school-based health centers may help to expand the number doing so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Sullivan
- Research and Evaluation, School-Based Health Alliance, Washington, District of Columbia.
| | - Hayley L Love
- Research and Evaluation, School-Based Health Alliance, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Rebecca L Fisher
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of School Health & Bureau of Maternal, Infant, and Reproductive Health, New York, New York
| | - John J Schlitt
- Research and Evaluation, School-Based Health Alliance, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Elizabeth L Cook
- Reproductive Health and Family Formation, Child Trends, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Samira Soleimanpour
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bryson A, Koyama A, Hassan A. Addressing long-acting reversible contraception access, bias, and coercion: supporting adolescent and young adult reproductive autonomy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2021; 33:345-353. [PMID: 33797464 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is comprised of highly effective methods (the subdermal implant and intrauterine devices) available to adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Professional medical societies endorse LARC use in AYAs and, more recently, have emphasized the importance of using a reproductive justice framework when providing LARC. This article reviews reproductive justice, discusses contraceptive coercion, examines bias, and highlights interventions that promote equitable reproductive healthcare. RECENT FINDINGS Research indicates that both bias and patient characteristics influence provider LARC practices. AYA access to comprehensive LARC services is limited, as counseling, provision, management, and removal are not offered at all sites providing reproductive healthcare to AYAs. Interventions aimed at addressing provider bias and knowledge, clinic policies, confidentiality concerns, insurance reimbursement, and systems of oppression can improve AYA access to equitable, comprehensive contraceptive care. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated inequities in reproductive healthcare, as well as provided unique innovations to decrease barriers, including telemedicine LARC services. SUMMARY Clinicians who care for AYAs should honor reproductive autonomy by approaching contraceptive services with a reproductive justice lens. This includes implementing patient-centered contraceptive counseling, increasing access to LARC, eliminating barriers to LARC removal, and committing to systemic changes to address healthcare inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Bryson
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Atsuko Koyama
- Department of Child Health, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Areej Hassan
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of Sexual Health Care and Education Among A Nationally Representative Sample of Adolescent Females. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2021; 9:1422-1429. [PMID: 34160820 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-021-01079-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) The USA has a high rate of adolescent pregnancy, with non-Hispanic (NH) Black and Hispanic women disproportionately affected. We sought to investigate the presence of racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of sexual health (SRH) care and education and whether such disparities contribute to differences in sexual health outcomes for youth. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a cross-sectional study of females aged 15-21 years who participated in the National Survey of Family Growth from 2008 to 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the association between race/ethnicity and SRH outcomes after adjustment for potential confounders. Models were developed to measure whether receipt of SRH care and education served as an effect modifier on SRH outcomes. RESULTS The sample included 4316 participants, representing 33.5 million females. Almost half (47.2%) received birth control services in the last 12 months; NH-Blacks (aOR 0.7 [0.5, 0.9]) and Hispanics (aOR 0.6 [0.5, 0.8]) were less likely to have obtained birth control services than NH-whites. Hispanics (aOR 1.5 [1.2, 1.9]) had a higher likelihood of receipt of condom education than NH-whites. We found that disparities in SRH outcomes were slightly mitigated after adjustment for access to SRH care and education. CONCLUSIONS We identified racial/ethnic disparities in sexual health outcomes and in SRH and education; however, SRH care and education can mitigate some of these differences in sexual behaviors and outcomes. Racial/ethnic differences in sexual health outcomes may be at least partially related to the differential receipt of sexual health care and education and deserve further investigation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hillard PJA. Moving Forward with Hope. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2021; 34:1-2. [PMID: 33485520 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
10
|
Kim CS, Lunde B, MacIsaac L, Arden M, Garney WR, Wilson KL, Li Y. Provision of contraceptive implants in school-based health centers: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Contraception 2020; 103:107-112. [PMID: 33221276 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of providing contraceptive implants in school-based health centers (SBHCs) compared to the practice of referring adolescents to non-SBHCs in New York City. STUDY DESIGN We developed a microsimulation model of teen pregnancy to estimate the cost-effectiveness of immediate provision of contraceptive implants at SBHCs over a 3-year time horizon. Model parameters were derived from both a retrospective chart review of patient data and published literature. The model projected the number of pregnancies as well as the total costs for each intervention scenario. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated using the public payer perspective, using direct costs only. RESULTS The health care cost of immediate provision of contraceptive implants at SBHCs was projected to be $13,719 per person compared to $13,567 per person for delayed provision at the referral appointment over 3 years. However, immediate provision would prevent 78 more pregnancies per 1000 adolescents over 3 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for implementing in-school provision was $1940 per additional pregnancy prevented, which was less than the $4206.41 willingness-to-pay threshold. Sensitivity analyses showed that the cost-effectiveness conclusion was robust over a wide range of key model inputs. CONCLUSION Provision of contraceptive implants in SBHCs compared to non-SBHCs is cost-effective for preventing unintended teen pregnancy. Health care providers and policymakers should consider expanding this model of patient-centered health care delivery to other locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Son Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stamford Hospital, Stamford, CT, United States.
| | - Britt Lunde
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Laura MacIsaac
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Martha Arden
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, United States
| | - Whitney R Garney
- College of Education and Human Development, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Kelly L Wilson
- College of Education and Human Development, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brindis CD, Decker MJ, Gutmann-Gonzalez A, Berglas NF. Perspectives on Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Strategies in the United States: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2020; 11:135-145. [PMID: 33117030 PMCID: PMC7567553 DOI: 10.2147/ahmt.s219949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Attempts to solve the "problem of adolescent pregnancy" have long been a focus of national, state, and local efforts in the United States. This review article summarizes trends and strategies around adolescent pregnancy prevention, provides lessons learned and best practices, and presents ideas for future directions. Over the past decades, a wide variety of policy and programmatic interventions have been implemented - including educational efforts, clinical health services, and community-wide coalitions - accompanied by a growing consensus regarding viable solutions. While notable reductions in adolescent pregnancy and childbearing have occurred across all sociodemographic groups, racial/ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic disparities persist. Many adolescents who most need sexual health information and services are underserved by current programs and policies. A growing understanding of the role of social determinants of health, the impacts of structural racism, and the need for equity and inclusion must inform the next set of interventions and societal commitments to not only ameliorate the occurrence of unintended adolescent pregnancy but also foster healthy adolescent development. Recommendations for future efforts include improving the content, quality, and sustainability of education programs; actively engaging youth in the design of policies, programs, and clinical services; using technology thoughtfully to improve health literacy; expanding access to services through telehealth and other delivery options; and designing programs and policies that recognize and address structural racism, health equity, and inclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire D Brindis
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, Adolescent and Young Adult Health National Resource Center, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA94118, USA
| | - Martha J Decker
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, Adolescent and Young Adult Health National Resource Center, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA94118, USA
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA94118, USA
| | - Abigail Gutmann-Gonzalez
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA94118, USA
| | - Nancy F Berglas
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, Adolescent and Young Adult Health National Resource Center, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA94118, USA
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA94118, USA
- Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA94612, USA
| |
Collapse
|