1
|
O'Sullivan A, Larsdotter C, Sawatsky R, Alvariza A, Imberg H, Cohen J, Ohlen J. Place of care and death preferences among recently bereaved family members: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024:spcare-2023-004697. [PMID: 38834237 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim was: (1) to investigate preferred place for end-of-life care and death for bereaved family members who had recently lost a person with advanced illness and (2) to investigate associations between bereaved family members' preferences and individual characteristics, health-related quality of life, as well as associations with their perception of the quality of care that the ill person had received, the ill person's preferred place of death and involvement in decision-making about care. METHODS A cross-sectional survey with bereaved family members, employing descriptive statistics and multinominal logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Of the 485 participants, 70.7% were women, 36.1% were ≥70 years old, 34.5% were partners and 51.8% were children of the deceased. Of the bereaved family members, 52% preferred home for place of end-of-life care and 43% for place of death. A higher likelihood of preferring inpatient palliative care was associated with being female and having higher education, whereas a lower likelihood of preferring a nursing home for the place of care and death was associated with higher secondary or higher education. Partners were more likely to prefer hospital for place of care and nursing home for place of death. CONCLUSIONS Home was the most preferred place for end-of-life care and death. Bereaved people's experiences of end-of-life care may impact their preferences, especially if they had a close relationship, such as a partner who had a higher preference for nursing home and hospital care. Conversations about preferences for the place of care and death considering previous experience are encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna O'Sullivan
- Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiold Hogskola-Campus Ersta, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Larsdotter
- Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Richard Sawatsky
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anette Alvariza
- Department of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiold Hogskola-Campus Ersta, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Research and Development, Stockholms Sjukhem, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Imberg
- Statistiska Konsultgruppen, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Joachim Cohen
- End of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joakim Ohlen
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre for Person-centred Care (GPCC); Palliative Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lim YX, Quah ELY, Chua KZY, Lin Ronggui CK, Govindasamy R, Ong SM, Ong EK, Phua GLG, Krishna LKR. A Systematic Scoping Review on Dignity Assessment Tools. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e263-e284. [PMID: 38092260 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT The provision of person-centered dignity-conserving care is central to palliative care. It is important to reevaluate current methods of assessing dignity as the concept of dignity is multifaceted. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to understand the tools which are used to assess a patient's dignity and the elements of dignity evaluated in these tools. METHODS Two independent and concurrent Systematic Evidence-Based Approach guided systematic scoping reviews (SSR in SEBA) on existing dignity assessment tools and on accounts of assessments of dignity were carried out. The SSR in SEBA on dignity assessment tools involving PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and CINAHL databases saw 22 full-text articles included from the 645 articles reviewed. The SSR in SEBA on accounts of assessments of dignity featured in the PubMed database identified 102 full-text articles which saw 46 articles included. RESULTS The domains identified were factors affecting patients' definition of dignity; elements of dignity-conserving care; and components of effective tools. CONCLUSION Current accounts to assess dignity and assessment tools fail to capture shifting self-concepts of dignity holistically. A portfolio-like appraisal of dignity is proposed to achieve assessments that are timely, longitudinal, and patient-specific. Portfolio-based assessments by members of the multidisciplinary team will better direct timely evaluations of relevant aspects of changing concepts of dignity, without losing the patient's holistic perception of dignity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Xue Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Casper Keegan Lin Ronggui
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Biomedical Ethics (C.K.L.R., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Pharmacy (C.K.L.R.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (C.K.L.R., R.G., E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ranitha Govindasamy
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (C.K.L.R., R.G., E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Department of Psychosocial Oncology (R.G.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore
| | - Simone Meiqi Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (C.K.L.R., R.G., E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School (E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), Singapore; Assisi Hospice (E.K.O.), Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Lien Centre for Palliative Care (G.L.G.P.), Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Biomedical Ethics (C.K.L.R., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (C.K.L.R., R.G., E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School (E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), Singapore; Palliative Care Institute Liverpool (L.K.R.R.), Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; PalC (L.K.R.R.), The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Is there a relationship between end-of-life cancer patients' dignity-related distress and caregivers' distress? An exploratory study. Palliat Support Care 2022:1-7. [PMID: 35866268 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951522000840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The mutual influence between end-of-life cancer patients and their family caregivers is widely endorsed. The present study aimed to explore the relationship between end-of-life cancer patients' dignity-related distress and the distress of their caregivers. METHOD A cross-sectional approach was used. The sample consisted of 128 patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) below 50 and a life expectancy of a few weeks, and their family caregivers. Personal and clinical data were collected and validated rating scales were administered: Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) to terminal cancer patients; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Demoralization Scale (DS), Herth Hope Index (HHI), Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Distress Thermometer (DT) to caregivers. RESULTS Findings highlighted significant correlations between patients' scores on the Psychological Distress PDI subscale and the PDI Total Score and caregivers' Emotional Role. Patients' Psychological Distress, PDI Total Score, and Loss of Purpose and Meaning were associated with caregivers' Disrupted Schedule. Finally, patients' Physical Symptoms and Dependency, Loss of Purpose and Meaning, and PDI Total Score were correlated with caregivers' Disheartenment. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS The results highlighted the key role of dignity as a relational dimension during the end-of-life phase. Therefore, because of caregivers' distress could affect patients' dignity-related distress by influencing the interpersonal aspects of patients' autonomy, it would be important to relieve caregivers' distress in order to promote patients' autonomy and minimize their fear of being a burden.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chua KZY, Quah ELY, Lim YX, Goh CK, Lim J, Wan DWJ, Ong SM, Chong CS, Yeo KZG, Goh LSH, See RM, Lee ASI, Ong YT, Chiam M, Ong EK, Zhou JX, Lim C, Ong SYK, Krishna L. A systematic scoping review on patients' perceptions of dignity. Palliat Care 2022; 21:118. [PMID: 35787278 PMCID: PMC9251939 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-01004-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A socioculturally appropriate appreciation of dignity is pivotal to the effective provision of care for dying patients. Yet concepts of dignity remain poorly defined. To address this gap in understanding and enhance dignity conserving end-of-life care, a review of current concepts of dignity is proposed. Methods To address its primary research question “How do patients conceive the concept of dignity at the end of life?”, this review appraises regnant concepts and influences of dignity, and evaluates current dignity conserving practices. To enhance accountability, transparency and reproducibility, this review employs the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) as its theoretical lens to guide a Systematic Evidence Based Approach guided Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) of patient perspectives of dignity. Three independent teams of reviewers independently analysed included articles from a structured search of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane Databases using thematic and content analyses. The themes and categories identified were compared and combined using the Funnelling Process to create domains that guide the discussion that follows. Results Seventy-eight thousand five hundred seventy-five abstracts were identified, 645 articles were reviewed, and 127 articles were included. The three domains identified were definitions of dignity, influences upon perceptions of dignity, and dignity conserving care. Conclusions This SSR in SEBA affirms the notion that dignity is intimately entwined with self-concepts of personhood and that effective dignity conserving measures at the end of life must be guided by the patient’s concept of dignity. This SSR in SEBA posits that such personalised culturally sensitive, and timely support of patients, their family and loved ones may be possible through the early and longitudinal application of a RToP based tool. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-01004-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yun Xue Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Chloe Keyi Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Jieyu Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Darius Wei Jun Wan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Simone Meiqi Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Chi Sum Chong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Kennan Zhi Guang Yeo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Laura Shih Hui Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Ray Meng See
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Alexia Sze Inn Lee
- Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Jamie Xuelian Zhou
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.,Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Lalit Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. .,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore. .,Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore. .,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. .,Academic Palliative Care Unit, United Kingdom Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK. .,Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077, Singapore. .,The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kroenke K, Stump TE, Monahan PO. Agreement between older adult patient and caregiver proxy symptom reports. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:50. [PMID: 35567663 PMCID: PMC9107556 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00457-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proxy report is essential for patients unable to complete patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures themselves and potentially beneficial when the caregiver perspective can complement patient report. In this study, we examine agreement between self-report by older adults and proxy report by their caregivers when completing PROs for pain, anxiety, depression, and other symptoms/impairments. METHODS Four PROs were administered by telephone to older adults and their caregivers followed by re-administration within 24 h in a random subgroup. The PROs included the PHQ-9 depression, GAD-7 anxiety, PEG pain, and SymTrak multi-dimensional symptom and functional status scales. RESULTS The sample consisted of 576 older adult and caregiver participants (188 patient-caregiver dyads, 200 patients without identified caregiver). The four measures had good internal (Cronbach's alpha, 0.76 to 0.92) and test-retest (ICC, 0.63 to 0.92) reliability whether completed by patients or caregivers. Total score and item-level means were relatively similar for both patient and caregiver reports. Agreement for total score as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was better for SymTrak-23 (0.48) and pain (0.58) than for anxiety (0.28) and depression (0.25). Multinomial modeling showed higher (worse) patient-reported scale scores were associated with caregiver underreporting, whereas higher caregiver task difficulty was associated with overreporting. CONCLUSION When averaged over individuals at the group level, proxy reports of PRO scores by caregivers tend to approximate patient reports. For individual patients, proxy report should be interpreted more cautiously for psychological symptoms as well as when patient-reported symptoms are more severe, or caregiver task difficulty is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Kroenke
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc, 1101 West 10th St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Timothy E Stump
- Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Patrick O Monahan
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nair R, Gao Y, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Perencevich E, Girotra S, Pandey A. Risk-Standardized Home Time as a Novel Hospital Performance Metric for Pneumonia Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries: a Retrospective Cohort Study. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:3031-3039. [PMID: 33904043 PMCID: PMC8481448 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06712-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) use hospital readmissions as a performance metric to incentivize hospital care for acute conditions including pneumonia. However, there are limitations to using readmission alone as a hospital performance metric. OBJECTIVE To characterize 30-day risk-standardized home time (RSHT), a novel patient-centered post-discharge performance metric for acute pneumonia hospitalizations in Medicare patients, and compare hospital rankings based on this metric with mortality and readmissions. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS A cohort of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries admitted between January 01, 2015 and November 30, 2017. INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN MEASURES Risk-standardized hospital-level home time within 30 days of discharge was evaluated as a novel performance metric. Multilevel regression models were used to calculate hospital-level estimates and rank hospitals based on RSHT, readmission rate (RSRR), and mortality rate (RSMR). KEY RESULTS A total of 1.7 million pneumonia admissions admitted to one of the 3116 hospitals were eligible for inclusion. The median 30-day RSHT was 20.5 days (interquartile range: 18.9-21.9 days; range: 5-29 days). Hospital-level characteristics such as case volume, bed size, for-profit ownership, rural location of the hospital, teaching status, and participation in the bundled payment program were significantly associated with home time. We found a modest, inverse correlation of RSHT with RSRR (rho: -0.233, p< 0.0001) and RSMR (rho: -0.223, p< 0.0001) for pneumonia. About 1/3rd of hospitals were reclassified as high performers based on their RSHT metric compared with the rank on their RSRR and RSMR metrics. CONCLUSION Home time is a novel, patient-centered, hospital-level metric that can be easily calculated using claims data and accounts for mortality, readmission to an acute care facility, and admission to a skilled nursing facility or long-term care facility after discharge. Utilization of this patient-centered metric could have policy implications in assessing hospital performance on delivery of healthcare to pneumonia patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajeshwari Nair
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Yubo Gao
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Eli Perencevich
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Saket Girotra
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ambarish Pandey
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Genuis SK, Luth W, Campbell S, Bubela T, Johnston WS. Communication About End of Life for Patients Living With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Evidence. Front Neurol 2021; 12:683197. [PMID: 34421792 PMCID: PMC8371472 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.683197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Communication about end of life, including advance care planning, life-sustaining therapies, palliative care, and end-of-life options, is critical for the clinical management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. The empirical evidence base for this communication has not been systematically examined. Objective: To support evidence-based communication guidance by (1) analyzing the scope and nature of research on health communication about end of life for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; and (2) summarizing resultant recommendations. Methods: A scoping review of empirical literature was conducted following recommended practices. Fifteen health-related and three legal databases were searched; 296 articles were screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria; and quantitative data extraction and analysis was conducted on 211 articles with qualitative analysis on a subset of 110 articles that focused primarily on health communication. Analyses summarized article characteristics, themes, and recommendations. Results: Analysis indicated a multidisciplinary but limited evidence base. Most reviewed articles addressed end-of-life communication as a peripheral focus of investigation. Generic communication skills are important; however, substantive and sufficient disease-related information, including symptom management and assistive devices, is critical to discussions about end of life. Few articles discussed communication about specific end-of-life options. Communication recommendations in analyzed articles draw attention to communication processes, style and content but lack the systematized guidance needed for clinical practice. Conclusions: This review of primary research articles highlights the limited evidence-base and consequent need for systematic, empirical investigation to inform effective communication about end of life for those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. This will provide a foundation for actionable, evidence-based communication guidelines about end of life. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelagh K. Genuis
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Westerly Luth
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sandra Campbell
- John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Tania Bubela
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Wendy S. Johnston
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schischlevskij P, Cordts I, Günther R, Stolte B, Zeller D, Schröter C, Weyen U, Regensburger M, Wolf J, Schneider I, Hermann A, Metelmann M, Kohl Z, Linker RA, Koch JC, Stendel C, Müschen LH, Osmanovic A, Binz C, Klopstock T, Dorst J, Ludolph AC, Boentert M, Hagenacker T, Deschauer M, Lingor P, Petri S, Schreiber-Katz O. Informal Caregiving in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A High Caregiver Burden and Drastic Consequences on Caregivers' Lives. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11060748. [PMID: 34200087 PMCID: PMC8228206 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11060748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease that causes progressive autonomy loss and need for care. This does not only affect patients themselves, but also the patients’ informal caregivers (CGs) in their health, personal and professional lives. The big efforts of this multi-center study were not only to evaluate the caregivers’ burden and to identify its predictors, but it also should provide a specific understanding of the needs of ALS patients’ CGs and fill the gap of knowledge on their personal and work lives. Using standardized questionnaires, primary data from patients and their main informal CGs (n = 249) were collected. Patients’ functional status and disease severity were evaluated using the Barthel Index, the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and the King’s Stages for ALS. The caregivers’ burden was recorded by the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Comorbid anxiety and depression of caregivers were assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Additionally, the EuroQol Five Dimension Five Level Scale evaluated their health-related quality of life. The caregivers’ burden was high (mean ZBI = 26/88, 0 = no burden, ≥24 = highly burdened) and correlated with patients’ functional status (rp = −0.555, p < 0.001, n = 242). It was influenced by the CGs’ own mental health issues due to caregiving (+11.36, 95% CI [6.84; 15.87], p < 0.001), patients’ wheelchair dependency (+9.30, 95% CI [5.94; 12.66], p < 0.001) and was interrelated with the CGs’ depression (rp = 0.627, p < 0.001, n = 234), anxiety (rp = 0.550, p < 0.001, n = 234), and poorer physical condition (rp = −0.362, p < 0.001, n = 237). Moreover, female CGs showed symptoms of anxiety more often, which also correlated with the patients’ impairment in daily routine (rs = −0.280, p < 0.001, n = 169). As increasing disease severity, along with decreasing autonomy, was the main predictor of caregiver burden and showed to create relevant (negative) implications on CGs’ lives, patient care and supportive therapies should address this issue. Moreover, in order to preserve the mental and physical health of the CGs, new concepts of care have to focus on both, on not only patients but also their CGs and gender-associated specific issues. As caregiving in ALS also significantly influences the socioeconomic status by restrictions in CGs’ work lives and income, and the main reported needs being lack of psychological support and a high bureaucracy, the situation of CGs needs more attention. Apart from their own multi-disciplinary medical and psychological care, more support in care and patient management issues is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Schischlevskij
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (P.S.); (L.H.M.); (A.O.); (C.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Isabell Cordts
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (I.C.); (M.D.); (P.L.)
| | - René Günther
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Benjamin Stolte
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (B.S.); (T.H.)
| | - Daniel Zeller
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany;
| | - Carsten Schröter
- Hoher Meißner Clinic, Neurology, 37242 Bad Sooden-Allendorf, Germany;
| | - Ute Weyen
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil, 44789 Bochum, Germany;
| | - Martin Regensburger
- Department of Molecular Neurology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Joachim Wolf
- Department of Neurology, Diakonissen Hospital Mannheim, 68163 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Ilka Schneider
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther University Halle/Saale, 06120 Halle, Germany;
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Sankt Georg, 04129 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hermann
- Translational Neurodegeneration Section “Albrecht-Kossel”, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, University of Rostock, 18147 Rostock, Germany;
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Moritz Metelmann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Zacharias Kohl
- Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (Z.K.); (R.A.L.)
| | - Ralf A. Linker
- Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (Z.K.); (R.A.L.)
| | - Jan Christoph Koch
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany;
| | - Claudia Stendel
- Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur Institute, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany; (C.S.); (T.K.)
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Lars H. Müschen
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (P.S.); (L.H.M.); (A.O.); (C.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Alma Osmanovic
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (P.S.); (L.H.M.); (A.O.); (C.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Camilla Binz
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (P.S.); (L.H.M.); (A.O.); (C.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Thomas Klopstock
- Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur Institute, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany; (C.S.); (T.K.)
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 80336 Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Dorst
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (J.D.); (A.C.L.)
| | - Albert C. Ludolph
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany; (J.D.); (A.C.L.)
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Matthias Boentert
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany;
- Department of Medicine, UKM Marienhospital, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany
| | - Tim Hagenacker
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (B.S.); (T.H.)
| | - Marcus Deschauer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (I.C.); (M.D.); (P.L.)
| | - Paul Lingor
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (I.C.); (M.D.); (P.L.)
| | - Susanne Petri
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (P.S.); (L.H.M.); (A.O.); (C.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Olivia Schreiber-Katz
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (P.S.); (L.H.M.); (A.O.); (C.B.); (S.P.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ounalli H, Mamo D, Testoni I, Belvederi Murri M, Caruso R, Grassi L. Improving Dignity of Care in Community-Dwelling Elderly Patients with Cognitive Decline and Their Caregivers. The Role of Dignity Therapy. Behav Sci (Basel) 2020; 10:bs10120178. [PMID: 33255402 PMCID: PMC7759823 DOI: 10.3390/bs10120178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Demographic changes have placed age-related mental health disorders at the forefront of public health challenges over the next three decades worldwide. Within the context of cognitive impairment and neurocognitive disorders among elderly people, the fragmentation of the self is associated with existential suffering, loss of meaning and dignity for the patient, as well as with a significant burden for the caregiver. Psychosocial interventions are part of a person-centered approach to cognitive impairment (including early stage dementia and dementia). Dignity therapy (DT) is a therapeutic intervention that has been shown to be effective in reducing existential distress, mood, and anxiety symptoms and improving dignity in persons with cancer and other terminal conditions in palliative care settings. The aims of this paper were: (i) To briefly summarize key issues and challenges related to care in gerontology considering specifically frail elderly/elderly with cognitive decline and their caregivers; and (ii) to provide a narrative review of the recent knowledge and evidence on DT in the elderly population with cognitive impairment. We searched the electronic data base (CINAHL, SCOPUS, PSycInfo, and PubMed studies) for studies regarding the application of DT in the elderly. Additionally, given the caregiver’s role as a custodian of diachronic unity of the cared-for and the need to help caregivers to cope with their own existential distress and anticipatory grief, we also propose a DT-dyadic approach addressing the needs of the family as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heifa Ounalli
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation (formerly Department Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences), University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (H.O.); (D.M.); (M.B.M.); (R.C.)
| | - David Mamo
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation (formerly Department Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences), University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (H.O.); (D.M.); (M.B.M.); (R.C.)
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Malta, 2080 Msida, Malta
| | - Ines Testoni
- Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy;
- Emili Sagol Creative Arts Therapies Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel
| | - Martino Belvederi Murri
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation (formerly Department Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences), University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (H.O.); (D.M.); (M.B.M.); (R.C.)
| | - Rosangela Caruso
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation (formerly Department Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences), University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (H.O.); (D.M.); (M.B.M.); (R.C.)
| | - Luigi Grassi
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation (formerly Department Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences), University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (H.O.); (D.M.); (M.B.M.); (R.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0532-455813; Fax: +39-0532-212240
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wong SS, Hsu FC, Avis NE, Clark CJ. Health-related quality of life and medical comorbidities in older patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An analysis using the 1998-2011 surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare health outcomes survey data. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 11:633-639. [PMID: 31515163 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study compares health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of older patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to controls without cancer, and examines the impact of medical comorbidities on HRQoL. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a case-control study using the 1998-2011 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) linked dataset. Cases were Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older diagnosed with PDAC (N = 128) and matched controls were without a history of cancer (N = 512). We used the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Veterans-RAND-12 (VR-12) to examine HRQoL and calculated mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component scores. Linear regression and mixed effects models were used to examine the impact of medical comorbidities on MCS and PCS for cases and controls, respectively. RESULTS Cases reported significantly poorer PCS (29.3 vs. 36.3) and MCS (44.8 vs. 49.9) compared to controls. Comorbidities were significantly associated with lower PCS and MCS in controls. However, neither total number of comorbidities or comorbidities grouped by organ systems (cardiopulmonary disease, musculoskeletal disease, diabetes) were significantly related to PCS or MCS for cases. Comparison of regression coefficients estimates did not indicate that lack of significance was due to differences in sample size. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study highlight the poor HRQoL reported by older patients with PDAC. HRQoL scores were very low in this population, particularly in physical health status, which were not explained by comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan S Wong
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | - Fang-Chi Hsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | - Nancy E Avis
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | - Clancy J Clark
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stahl EP, Dickert NW, Cole RT, Laskar SR, Morris AA, Smith AL, Vega JD, Gupta D. Decisional regret in left ventricular assist device patient-caregiver dyads. Heart Lung 2019; 48:400-404. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
12
|
Intervening in uncertainty. Geriatr Nurs 2019; 40:217-219. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
13
|
Lee H, Shi SM, Kim DH. Home Time as a Patient-Centered Outcome in Administrative Claims Data. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 67:347-351. [PMID: 30578532 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Home time, the number of days alive and spent out of hospital and skilled nursing facility, has been proposed as a patient-centered outcome that can be readily calculated in administrative claims data. OBJECTIVES To compare home time against existing patient-centered outcome measures. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Community. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4594 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with complete survey and claims data in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey 2010 to 2011. MEASUREMENTS Home time was calculated from the 2011 claims data (range, 0-365 days). The 1-year incidence of patient-centered outcomes (poor self-rated health, mobility impairment, depression, limited social activity, and difficulty in self-care) was measured. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was derived by contrasting the mean home time between those who experienced functional decline or death and those who did not. RESULTS The mean home time was 355.8 days (SD, 42.1 days); 84.1% had a home time of 365 days, and 5.7% had a home time of 336 days or fewer. The incidence of poor self-rated health ranged from 2% (home time, 365 days) to 21% (home time, less than 337 days). Similarly, the corresponding incidence risks were 11% to 59% for mobility impairment, 5% to 19% for depression, 17% to 67% for limited social activity, and 13% to 68% for difficulty in self-care. The risk of mobility impairment, depression, and difficulty in self-care increased steeply after home time loss of 15 days or greater. The MCID of home time was 18.6 days. CONCLUSION A loss in home time is associated with decline in several patient-centered outcome measures in community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries. These results provide empirical evidence to promote adoption of home time and its clinical interpretation for database studies of medical interventions. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:347-351, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemin Lee
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sandra M Shi
- Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dae Hyun Kim
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|