Retrocaval ureter: a rare cause of hydronephrosis in children

Retrocaval Ureter as a Rare Cause of Hydroureteronephrosis: A Case Report

Retrocaval ureter (RCU), also known as pre-ureteral vena cava or circumcaval ureter, is a rare congenital anomaly caused by inferior vena cava (IVC) dysgenesis, leading to the right ureter coursing behind the IVC. RCU results in obstructive proximal hydroureteronephrosis, remaining asymptomatic until the third decade when hydronephrosis develops. Diagnosis relies on imaging modalities like intravenous urography (IVU), ultrasonography, computed tomography urography (CTU), magnetic resonance urography, and nuclear scintigraphy. CTU provides comprehensive 3D evaluation. We report a novel case of a 50-year-old male with RCU complicated by a concurrent distal ureteral calculus. CTU demonstrated the characteristic "S-shaped" proximal ureteral deformity and its aberrant posterior course relative to the IVC, enabling accurate preoperative diagnosis. The co-occurrence of RCU with ureteral calculus is notably rare, underlining the necessity of an exhaustive diagnostic process. The patient successfully underwent a combined surgical intervention, consisting of laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy for RCU correction and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for calculus removal, showcasing a minimally invasive approach to simultaneously address both conditions. This report underscores the significance of advanced cross-sectional imaging in diagnosing RCU and demonstrates the effectiveness of integrated minimally invasive surgical techniques in treating complex urological anomalies. By documenting this case, we contribute to the broader understanding and awareness of RCU among clinicians, potentially guiding more prompt recognition and comprehensive management of this rare condition.

Laparoscopic Dismembered Repair in Two Patients with Retrocaval Ureter

Retrocaval ureter (RCU) or circumcaval ureter is a rare cause of congenital hydronephrosis. The surgical correction of RCU should be performed in all patients with obstruction and hydronephrosis symptoms, lumbar pain, urinary tract infections, hematuria, or urolithiasis. Traditionally, an open surgical approach was used for the treatment of RCU. Nowadays, surgical correction of these anomalies is performed using minimally invasive techniques. We report on two cases treated with our standardized laparoscopic technique using only three 5-mm trocars. The proposed approach could be considered as the first-line treatment for RCU.

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted repair of retrocaval ureter in children: a multi-institutional comparative study with open repair

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to report a multi-institutional experience with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted repair of retrocaval ureter in children and to compare outcome of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open repair.

METHODS

The records of all children, who underwent MIS and open repair of retrocaval ureters in six international pediatric urology units over a 5-year period, were retrospectively collected. Data were grouped according to the operative approach: a laparoscopic group (G1) included five patients, a robotic-assisted group (G2) included four patients, and an open group (G3) included three patients. The groups were compared in regard to operative and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

At follow-up, all patients (one G1 patient after redo-surgery) reported complete resolution of symptoms and radiologic improvement of hydronephrosis and obstruction. In regard to postoperative complications, one G1 patient developed stenosis of anastomosis and needed re-operation with no further recurrence (IIIb Clavien). G2 reported the lowest average operative time (135 min) compared to G1 (178.3 min) and G3 (210 min). MIS (G1-G2) reported a significantly better postoperative outcome compared to open repair (G3) in terms of analgesic requirements, hospitalization, and cosmetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

The study outcomes suggest that MIS should be the first choice for retrocaval ureter because of the minimal invasiveness and the better cosmetic outcome compared to open surgery. Furthermore, our results showed that robotic-assisted reconstruction was technically easier, safer, and quicker compared to laparoscopic repair, and for these reasons, it should be preferentially adopted, when available.

Retrocaval Ureter in Children: A Report of Eight Cases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to report on our last nine years' experience in the diagnosis and treatment of retrocaval ureter.

METHODS

Eight patients with retrocaval ureter were reviewed. Intravenous urography and retrograde pyelography were used for confirming the diagnosis. All of the patients had undergone surgery, one case being done laparoscopically. The mean age of the patients was 9.2 years (range 2 to 13 years).

RESULTS

Five patients were boys and three were girls. The clinical manifestations were right flank pain in three (37.5%), gross haematuria in one (12.5%) and urinary tract infection in one (12.5%). Three asymptomatic patients were diagnosed by routine physical examination. All of the patients had Type 2 and right-sided retrocaval ureter. Associated anomalies were seen in none of the patients. Retrocaval ureter is a rare anomaly in the paediatric age group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy is a promising method to repair the retrocaval ureter.

Clinical presentation and outcome of cats with circumcaval ureters associated with a ureteral obstruction

BACKGROUND

Circumcaval ureters (CU) are a rare embryological malformation resulting in ventral displacement of the caudal vena cava, which crosses the ureter, potentially causing a ureteral stricture.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate cats with obstructed CU(s) and report the presenting signs, diagnostics, treatment(s), and outcomes. Cats with obstructed CU(s) were compared to ureterally obstructed cats without CU(s).

ANIMALS

193 cats; 22 circumcaval obstructed (Group 1); 106 non-circumcaval obstructed (Group 2); 65 non-obstructed necropsy cases (Group 3).

METHODS

Retrospective study, review of medical records for cats treated for benign ureteral obstructions from AMC and University of Pennsylvania between 2009 and 2013.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

surgical treatment of benign ureteral obstruction, complete medical record including radiographic, ultrasonographic, biochemistry, and surgical findings.

RESULTS

Seventeen percent (22/128) of obstructed cats had a CU (80% right-sided) compared to 14% (9/65) non-obstructed necropsy cats (89% right-sided). Clinical presentation, radiographic findings, and creatinine were not statistically different between Groups 1 and 2. Strictures were a statistically more common (40%) cause of ureteral obstruction in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (17%) (P = .01). The MST for Groups 1 and 2 after ureteral decompression was 923 and 762 days, respectively (P = .62), with the MST for death secondary to kidney disease in both groups being >1,442 days. Re-obstruction was the most common complication in Group 1 (24%) occurring more commonly in ureters of cats treated with a ureteral stent(s) (44%) compared to the subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) device (8%) (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Ureteral obstructions in cats with a CU(s) have a similar outcome to those cats with a ureteral obstruction and normal ureteral anatomy. Long-term prognosis is good for benign ureteral obstructions treated with a double pigtail stent or a SUB device. The SUB device re-obstructed less commonly than the ureteral stent, especially when a ureteral stricture was present.

Retrocaval ureter with stone in the retrocaval segment of the ureter

Retrocaval ureter is abnormal looping of the proximal ureter behind the inferior vena cava. The aberrant anatomy results in the compression of the ureter causing hydronephrosis. This is a very infrequent cause of hydronephrosis in children. Association of retrocaval ureter with a stone in the looping segment of the ureter is extremely rare. We report one such pediatric case which was diagnosed preoperatively with a review of pediatric-only cases reported in last 5 years.