Outcomes of complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation after failed ipsilateral endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux

Does previous endoscopic subureteric injection (STING) effect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation surgery (RALUR) in children?

BACKGROUND

There is lack of evidence on the success of robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) who had prior intervention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of previous unsuccessful STING on the outcomes of RALUR in children.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 67 children treated with RALUR by a single surgeon for the treatment of VUR were scanned between February 2018 and April 2022. Two patients were excluded from the final data analysis due to the presence of a megaureter. Patients were divided into two groups: those with a history of STING (Group A - n:14) and those without STING (Group B - n:51). Patient characteristics, previous numbers of injections, console time, total operative time, perioperative and postoperative complications and clinical success data were collected. Clavien Dindo and Satava complication scales were used as the standard record of peri and postoperative complications. Radiographic success was defined as absence of reflux detected on postoperative voiding cystourethrography, whereas clinical success was defined as the absence of a febrile urinary tract infection during the follow-up. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests and Fisher exact test were used where appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 36 (55.3%) female versus 29 (44.6%) male patients were operated for 96 refluxive ureters. Nearly half of the patients were with bilateral VUR (n = 31). The mean follow-up was 20.2 ± 15.4 months. The median age of patients was 59 ± 31 (range: 28-132 months) versus 46 ± 33.1 (range: 7-206 months) for groups A and B respectively (p = 0.22). Gender, age, peri- and postoperative complication rates, and clinical success were comparable between the two groups. The median operative time and the console time was significantly higher in children with history of STING (op time: 142.5 ± 27.4 versus 120 ± 24.9 min (p = 0.008), console time: 117.5 ± 28.2 versus 100 ± 24.5 min (p = 0.011) for groups A and B, respectively. A total of six complications (9.2%) occurred with none of them were greater than Clavien grade 3b. The overall clinical success rate was 97%, with 2 cases of clinical failure. In both cases, VCUG demonstrated absence of VUR.

DISCUSSION

The outcomes of our study provided that RALUR is effective with more than 95% success rates despite failed endoscopic injection procedures.

CONCLUSION

The previous history of STING neither changes the success nor the complication rates of RALUR. However, this can lead to more challenging surgery by increasing the total operative times.

Transvesicoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation for Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: Does Prior Failed Endoscopic Injection Impact Outcome?

Purpose: Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation (TVUR) for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a technically demanding operation. The technical difficulty is further increased by previous failed endoscopic injection, which causes intense fibrosis around the ureter. In this study, we compared primary TVUR with TVUR after previous failed endoscopic injection for VUR. Materials and Methods: The records of all children undergoing TVUR by a single surgeon over a 4-year period were analyzed. The children were divided into group 1 (primary TVUR, n = 50) and group 2 (TVUR after previous failed endoscopic treatment of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid, n = 7). Demographic, clinical, radiologic, operative and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. The results were analyzed by statistical software; Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test were used where appropriate, and P < .05 was considered significant. Results: Both the groups were comparable with respect to age and mean VUR grade. The mean VUR grade was significantly higher in group 1 and mean operative time per ureter was significantly more for group 2 than group 1. The postoperative hospital stay, success of TVUR, and complications were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report of its kind. TVUR after previous failed endoscopic injection could be done safely with good success, but with longer operative time than primary TVUR even in expert hands. Hence, previous failed endoscopic injection is not a contraindication to TVUR.

Ensuring safety and feasibility for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors by single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system

Background

Single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (S-RALS) is rarely applied in pediatric surgery. There is still no study on the application of S-RALS for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors. The current study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of S-RALS for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors using the da Vinci Xi system.

Methods

The clinical data of three patients who underwent S-RALS for resection of benign ovarian tumors in the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from May 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of these children was 7.9 years (5.8–9.3 years). One was a case of bilateral ovarian tumors, and the other two were cases of right ovarian tumors.

Results

All three patients successfully underwent the resection of ovarian tumors through S-RALS without conversion to laparotomy. The average operation time was 180 min (118–231 min). The average amount of blood loss was 20 ml (10–35 ml). No drainage tube was placed. All postoperative pathological types of ovarian tumors were mature cystic teratomas in the three cases. All patients started a liquid diet 2 h after surgery. The average length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.7 days (3–7 days). No tumor recurred, no surgical site hernia occurred, and the wound healed very well with a cosmetic scar in the lower umbilical crease during the postoperative follow-up for 6–18 months.

Conclusion

S-RALS has the advantages of less surgical trauma, quick postoperative recovery, and a cosmetic scar in the lower umbilical crease. It is safe, effective, and feasible for pediatric benign ovarian tumors.