Estrogen activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase is mediated by ER-α36 in ER-positive breast cancer cells

Estrogenic control of matrix metalloproteinases: a perspective on breast tumor invasion and metastasis

Metastasis is the major cause of mortality in breast cancer patients, and presents an invincible therapeutic challenge. It is a complex process of dissemination of tumor epithelial cells, which is associated with disruption of tissue homeostasis, and alterations in the tumor microenvironment through extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, stromal alteration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) constitute a group of more than 25 zinc-dependent endopeptidases. By virtue of their ability to degrade a wide variety of ECM-associated proteins, they enable ECM remodelling during development, and disease. A large body of clinical data, and experimental evidences implicate MMPs in the invasion and metastasis of breast tumors. While MMPs are aberrantly expressed in breast tumors, few appear to have a dual role in disease progression; either promoting or inhibiting metastasis. Given the role of estrogen in breast cancer development, it is natural to ask whether this steroid hormone has any role in breast cancer metastasis. This review is a round-up of the prominent literature that presents estrogenic control of MMPs, which in turn implies its influence on the tumor microenvironment and metastasis.

Integrative Analysis of DNA Methylation and microRNA Reveals GNPDA1 and SLC25A16 Related to Biopsychosocial Factors Among Taiwanese Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer

Biopsychosocial factors, including family history, influence the development of breast cancer. Malignancies in women with a family history of breast cancer may be detectable based on DNA methylation and microRNA. Objectives: The present study extended an integrative analysis of DNA methylation and microRNA to identify genes associated with biopsychosocial factors. Methods: We identified 3060 healthy women from the Taiwan Biobank and included 32 blood plasma samples for analysis of biopsychosocial factors and epigenetic changes. GEO databases and bioinformatics approaches were used for the identification and validation of potential genes. Results: Our integrative analysis revealed GNPDA1 and SLC25A16 as potential genes. Age, a family history of cancer, and alcohol consumption were associated with GNPDA1 and SLC25A16 based on the current data set and the GEO data set. GNPDA1 and SLC25A16 exhibited significant expression in breast cancer tissues based on UALCAN analysis, where they were overexpressed and underexpressed, respectively. Through a MethSurv analysis, GNPDA1 hypomethylation and SLC25A16 hypermethylation were associated with poor prognoses in terms of overall survival in breast cancer. Moreover, through a MetaCore functional enrichment analysis, GNPDA1 and SLC25A16 were associated with the BRCA1, BRCA2, and pro-oncogenic actions of the androgen receptor in breast cancer. Further, GNPDA1 and SLC25A16 were enriched in known targets of approved cancer drugs as potential genes associated with breast cancer. Conclusions: These two genes might serve as biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer, especially for women with a family history of breast cancer.

Estrogen receptor variant ER-α36 facilitates estrogen signaling via EGFR in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a deadly and common primary brain tumor. Poor prognosis is linked to high proliferation and cell heterogeneity. Sex differences may play a role in patient outcome. Previous studies showed that ER-α36, a variant of the estrogen receptor (ER), mediated non-genomic estrogen signaling and is highly expressed in many ER-negative malignant tumors. ER-α36 also associates with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the cross talk between ER-α36 and EGFR in estrogen-mediated GBM cell proliferation. Here, we showed that ER-α36 was highly expressed and confirmed that ER-α36 co-labels with EGFR in human GBM samples using immunohistochemical techniques. We also investigated the mechanisms of estrogen-induced proliferation in ER-α-negative cell lines. We found that GBM cells showed varying responsive to mitogenic estrogen signaling which correlated with ER-α36 expression, and knockdown of ER-α36 diminished the response. Exposure to estrogen also caused upregulation of cyclin protein expression in vitro. We also found that low concentration of estrogen promoted SRC-Y-416 and inhibited SRC-Y-527 phosphorylation, corresponding with activated SRC signaling. Inhibiting SRC or EGFR abolished estrogen-induced mitogenic signaling, including cyclin expression and MAPK phosphorylation. Cumulatively, our results demonstrate that ER-α36 promotes non-genomic estrogen signaling via the EGFR/SRC/MAPK pathway in GBM. This may be important for the treatment of ER-α-negative GBMs that retain high level of ER-α36, since estrogen may be a viable therapeutic target for these patients.

A review of the functions of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 in vascular and neurological aging

Aging-related diseases, especially vascular and neurological disorders cause huge economic burden. How to delay vascular and neurological aging is one of the insurmountable questions. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER) has been extensively investigated in recent years due to its multiple biological responses. In this review, the function of GPER in aging-related diseases represented by vascular diseases, and neurological disorders were discussed. Apart from that, activation of GPER was also found to renovate the aging brain characterized by memory decline, but in a manner different from another two nuclear estrogen receptors estrogen receptor (ER)α and ERβ. This salutary effect would be better clarified from the aspects of synaptic inputs and transmission. Furthermore, we carefully described molecular mechanisms underpinning GPER-mediated effects. This review would update our understanding of GPER in the aging process. Targeting GPER may represent a promising strategy in the aging-related disorders.

Loss of Estrogen Receptors is Associated with Increased Tumor Aggression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) responds to 17β-estradiol via estrogen-receptor (ER, transcribed from ESR1) dependent mechanisms, but is not recognized as a hormonally responsive cancer. 17β-estradiol production by LSCC cell lines UM-SCC-11A and UM-SCC-12 was examined. Wild type (WT) and ESR1-silenced LSCC cultures and xenografts were examined for 17β-estradiol responsiveness in vivo. 14 LSCC and surrounding epithelial samples at various pathological stages were obtained from patients; ERα and ERβ expression were verified using data from the total cancer genome atlas. UM-SCC-11A and UM-SCC-12 both produce 17β-estradiol, but only UM-SCC-12, not UM-SCC-11A, xenograft tumors grow larger in vivo in response to systemic 17β-estradiol treatments. ERα66 and ERα36 expression inversely correlated with clinical cancer stage and tumor burden. LSCC ERα66 expression was higher compared to surrounding epithelia in indolent samples but lower in aggressive LSCC. ERβ expression was highly variable. High ESR1 expression correlated with improved survival in LSCC. Loss of ERα66 expression inversely correlated with prognosis in LSCC. ERα66 may be a histopathological marker of aggression in LSCC.

24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 modulates tumorigenicity in breast cancer in an estrogen receptor-dependent manner

Vitamin D has long been prescribed as a supplement to breast cancer patients. This is partially motivated by data indicating that low serum vitamin D, measured as 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D₃], is associated with worsened cancer prognosis and decreased survival rates in cancer patients. However, clinical studies investigating the role of vitamin D supplementation in breast cancer treatment are largely inconclusive. One reason for this may be that many of these studies ignore the complexity of the vitamin D metabolome and the effects of these metabolites at the cellular level. Once ingested, vitamin D is metabolized into 37 different metabolites, including 25(OH)D₃, which is the metabolite actually measured clinically, as well as 1,25(OH)₂D₃ and 24,25(OH)₂D₃. Recent work by our lab and others has demonstrated a role for 24R,25(OH)₂D₃, in the modulation of breast cancer tumors via an estrogen receptor α-dependent mechanism. This review highlights the importance of considering estrogen receptor status in vitamin d-associated prognostic studies of breast cancer and proposes a potential mechanism for 24R,25(OH)₂D₃ signaling in breast cancer cells.

24R,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 regulates breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies indicate high serum 25(OH)D₃ is associated with increased survival in breast cancer patients. Pre-clinical studies attributed this to anti-tumorigenic properties of its metabolite 1α,25(OH)₂D₃. However, 1α,25(OH)₂D₃ is highly calcemic and thus has a narrow therapeutic window. Here we propose another metabolite, 24R,25(OH)₂D₃, as an alternative non-calcemic vitamin D₃ supplement.

METHODS

NOD-SCID-IL2γR null female mice with MCF7 breast cancer xenografts in the mammary fat pad were treated with 24R,25(OH)₂D₃ and changes in tumor burden and metastases were assessed. ERα66+ MCF7 and T47D cells, and ERα66- HCC38 cells were treated with 24R,25(OH)₂D₃in vitro to assess effects on proliferation and apoptosis. Effects on migration and metastatic markers were assessed in MCF7.

RESULTS

24R,25(OH)₂D₃ reduced MCF7 tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. In vitro results indicate that this was not due to an anti-proliferative effect; 24R,25(OH)₂D₃ stimulated DNA synthesis in MCF7 and T47D. In contrast, markers of invasion and metastasis were decreased. 24R,25(OH)₂D₃ caused dose-dependent increases in apoptosis in MCF7 and T47D, but not HCC38 cells. Inhibitors to palmitoylation, caveolae integrity, phospholipase-D, and estrogen receptors (ER) demonstrate that 24R,25(OH)₂D₃ acts on MCF7 cells through caveolae-associated, phospholipase D-dependent mechanisms via cross-talk with ERs.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that 24R,25(OH)₂D₃ shows promise in treatment of breast cancer by stimulating tumor apoptosis and reducing metastasis.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

24R,25(OH)₂D₃ regulates breast cancer cell survival through ER-associated mechanisms similar to 24R,25(OH)₂D₃ effects on chondrocytes. Thus, 24R,25(OH)₂D₃ may modulate cell survival in other estrogen-responsive cell types, and its therapeutic potential should be investigated in ER-associated pathologies.

Estradiol receptor profile and estrogen responsiveness in laryngeal cancer and clinical outcomes

There is growing evidence that laryngeal cancers are responsive to sex hormones, specifically 17β-estradiol (E₂), despite controversy regarding the presence and characterization of E₂ receptors (ER). Determination of sex hormone responsiveness impacts the prognosis of laryngeal cancer patients and the treatment modalities implemented by their clinicians. Discovery of membrane-associated steroid hormone receptors and rapid membrane signaling opened the possibility that cancers previously labeled 'non-hormone dependent' and 'ER negative' might in fact be susceptible to the effects of E₂ via these membrane receptors. ERα66 and ERβ, the classical nuclear receptors, are present in the membranes of different cancer cells via a mechanism referred to as trafficking. Novel splice variants of these traditional receptors, a key example being ERα36, have also been found in the caveolae of cancer cells. Previous work demonstrated that ERα36 has a role in the tumorigenesis of laryngeal cancer, enhancing both proliferation and the anti-apoptotic effect of E₂ against chemotherapeutics. The present study showed that expression of different membrane ERs in laryngeal cancer is not uniform, which may result in differential and even antagonistic responses to E₂. E₂ had protective or deleterious effects in different cancer cell lines, stimulating proliferation and conferring anti-apoptotic potential to the cancer cells according to their receptor profile. These findings stress the importance of establishing the molecular and clinical characterization of the specific laryngeal tumor in order to tailor treatment accordingly, thus optimizing care while reducing adverse effects for individual patients.

The ER-α36/EGFR signaling loop promotes growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the common primary liver cancer and the third leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. It is generally thought that the estrogen-signaling pathway is not related to the development and progression of human HCC. However, accumulating evidences indicate the existence of a rapid estrogen signaling in HCC cells that is able to promote cell growth. However, the receptor that mediates the rapid estrogen signaling in HCC cells has not been established. Previously, our laboratory identified a variant of ER-α, ER-α36, and found that ER-α36 mediates the rapid estrogen signaling such as the activation of the MAPK/ERK signaling in breast carcinoma cells. Our current experiments studied the role of the rapid estrogen signaling mediated by ER-α36 in growth of HCC HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells that highly express ER-α36 and found these cells were strongly responsive to the rapid estrogen signaling. Knockdown of ER-α36 expression in these HCC cells using the shRNA method attenuated their responsiveness to estrogen and destabilized EGFR protein. ER-α36 mediated estrogen-induced phosphorylation of Src and the MAPK/ERK as well as cyclin D1 expression. In addition, there existed an ER-α36/EGFR positive regulatory loop in HCC cells that was important for the maintenance and positive regulation of HCC tumorsphere cells. Our results thus indicated that the rapid estrogen receptor is mediated by ER-α36 in HCC cells through the EGFR/Src/ERK signaling pathway and suggested that the ER-α36/EGFR signaling loop is a potential target to develop novel therapeutic approaches for HCC treatment.

Communication between genomic and non-genomic signaling events coordinate steroid hormone actions

Steroid hormones are lipophilic molecules produced in one cell that can travel great distances within the body to elicit biological effects in another cell. In the canonical pathway, steroid hormone binding to a nuclear receptor (NR), often in the cytoplasm, causes the receptor to undergo a conformational change and translocate to the nucleus, where it interacts with specific sequences of DNA to regulate transcription. In addition to the classical genomic mechanism of action, alternate mechanisms of steroid activity have emerged that involve rapid, non-genomic signaling. The distinction between these two major mechanisms of action lies in the subcellular location of the initiating steroid hormone action. Importantly, the mechanisms of action are not exclusive, in that each can affect the activity of the other. Here, we describe the different types of genomic and non-genomic steroid hormone signaling mechanisms and how they can influence one another to ultimately regulate biology. Further, we discuss the approaches being used to study the non-genomic signaling events and address important caveats to be considered when designing new experiments. Thus, this minireview can serve as an introduction to the diverse signaling mechanisms of steroid hormones and offers initial, experimental guidance to those entering the field.

Mammary epithelial cell phenotype disruption in vitro and in vivo through ERalpha36 overexpression

Estrogen receptor alpha 36 (ERα36) is a variant of the canonical estrogen receptor alpha (ERα66), widely expressed in hormone sensitive cancer cells and whose high expression level correlates with a poor survival prognosis for breast cancer patients. While ERα36 activity have been related to breast cancer progression or acquired resistance to treatment, expression level and location of ERα36 are poorly documented in the normal mammary gland. Therefore, we explored the consequences of a ERα36 overexpression in vitro in MCF-10A normal mammary epithelial cells and in vivo in a unique model of MMTV-ERα36 transgenic mouse strain wherein ERα36 mRNA was specifically expressed in the mammary gland. By a combination of bioinformatics and computational analyses of microarray data, we identified hierarchical gene networks, downstream of ERα36 and modulated by the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Concomitantly, ERα36 overexpression lowered proliferation rate but enhanced migration potential and resistance to staurosporin-induced apoptosis of the MCF-10A cell line. In vivo, ERα36 expression led to duct epithelium thinning and disruption in adult but not in prepubescent mouse mammary gland. These phenotypes correlated with a loss of E-cadherin expression. Here, we show that an enhanced expression of ERα36 is sufficient, by itself, to disrupt normal breast epithelial phenotype in vivo and in vitro through a dominant-positive effect on nongenomic estrogen signaling pathways. These results also suggest that, in the presence of adult endogenous steroid levels, ERα36 overexpression in vivo contributes to alter mammary gland architecture which may support pre-neoplastic lesion and augment breast cancer risk.

The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor as a modulator of neoplastic transformation

Estrogens play a crucial role in the regulation of physiological and pathophysiological processes. These hormones act through specific receptors, most notably the canonical estrogen receptors α and β (ERα and ERβ) and their truncated forms as well as the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER). Several studies have shown that GPER is expressed in many normal and cancer cells, including those of the breast, endometrium, ovary, testis and lung. Hormonal imbalance is one possible cause of cancer development. An accumulating body of evidence indicates that GPER is involved in the regulation of cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion, it may act as a mediator of microRNA, and is believed to modulate the inflammation associated with neoplastic transformation. Furthermore, used in various treatment regimens anti-estrogens such as tamoxifen, raloxifen and fulvestrant (ICI 182.780), antagonists/modulators of canonical estrogen receptors, were found to be GPER agonists. This review presents the current knowledge about the potential role of GPER in neoplastic transformation.

Roles of the ER-α36-EGFR/HER2 positive regulatory loops in tamoxifen resistance

Tamoxifen provided a successful treatment for ER-positive breast cancer for the past four decades. However, most breast tumors are eventually resistant to tamoxifen therapy. Extensive researches were conducted to understand the molecular mechanisms involved in tamoxifen resistance, and have revealed that multiple signaling molecules and pathways such as EGFR and HER2 are involved in tamoxifen resistance. Currently, the mechanisms by which tamoxifen sensitive breast cancer cells acquire these signaling pathways and develop tamoxifen resistance have not been elucidated. The identification of ER-α36, a variant of ER-α, that is able to mediate agonist activity of tamoxifen provided great insights into the underlying mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance. In this review, we will discuss the biological function and the possible underlying mechanisms of ER-α36 in tamoxifen resistance and specifically illustrate a novel cross-talk mechanism; positive regulatory loops between the ER-α36 and EGFR/HER2 in tamoxifen resistance. The function and the underlying mechanisms of ER-α36 in tamoxifen resistance of the breast cancer stem/progenitor cells will also be discussed. Finally, we will postulate a novel approach to restore tamoxifen sensitivity in tamoxifen resistant breast cancer cells.

Rapid steroid hormone actions via membrane receptors

Steroid hormones regulate a wide variety of physiological and developmental functions. Traditional steroid hormone signaling acts through nuclear and cytosolic receptors, altering gene transcription and subsequently regulating cellular activity. This is particularly important in hormonally-responsive cancers, where therapies that target classical steroid hormone receptors have become clinical staples in the treatment and management of disease. Much progress has been made in the last decade in detecting novel receptors and elucidating their mechanisms, particularly their rapid signaling effects and subsequent impact on tumorigenesis. Many of these receptors are membrane-bound and lack DNA-binding sites, functionally separating them from their classical cytosolic receptor counterparts. Membrane-bound receptors have been implicated in a number of pathways that disrupt the cell cycle and impact tumorigenesis. Among these are pathways that involve phospholipase D, phospholipase C, and phosphoinositide-3 kinase. The crosstalk between these pathways has been shown to affect apoptosis and proliferation in cardiac cells, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes as well as cancer cells. This review focuses on rapid signaling by 17β-estradiol and 1α,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 to examine the integrated actions of classical and rapid steroid signaling pathways both in contrast to each other and in concert with other rapid signaling pathways. This new approach lends insight into rapid signaling by steroid hormones and its potential for use in targeted drug therapies that maximize the benefits of traditional steroid hormone-directed therapies while mitigating their less desirable effects.

The analysis of estrogen receptor-α positive breast cancer stem-like cells unveils a high expression of the serpin proteinase inhibitor PI-9: Possible regulatory mechanisms

Breast cancer stem cells seem to play important roles in breast tumor recurrence and endocrine therapy resistance, although the underlying mechanisms have not been well established. Moreover, in some tumor systems the immunosurveillance failure against cancer cells has been related to the presence of the granzyme B inhibitor PI-9. This study explored the status of PI-9 in tumorspheres isolated from estrogen receptor-α positive (ERα+) breast cancer MCF7 cells. Studies were performed in tertiary tumorspheres which possess high levels of stemness markers (Nanog, Oct3/4 and Sox2) and self-renewal ability. The exposure to estrogens (17-β estradiol and genistein) increased the number and sizes of tumorspheres, promoting cell proliferation as demonstrated by the increase in the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). The study of the three isoforms (66, 46 and 36 kDa) of ERα disclosed that tertiary tumorspheres exhibit a marked increase in ERα36, while the level of ERα66, which is highly expressed in MCF7 cells, declines. Although it is known that PI-9 is a transcriptional target of ERα66, surprisingly in tertiary tumorspheres, despite the reduced level of ERα66, the protein and mRNA content of PI-9 is higher than in MCF7 cells. Treatment with estrogens further increased PI-9 level while decreased that of ERα66 isoform thus excluding the involvement of this receptor isoform in the event. Moreover, our studies also provided evidence that tertiary tumorspheres express elevated levels of CXCR4 and phospho-p38, suggesting that the high PI-9 content might be ascribed to the activation of the proliferative CXCR4/phospho-p38 axis. Taken together, these events could supply a selective advantage to breast cancer stem cells by interfering with immunosurveillance systems and open up the avenue to new possible targets for breast cancer treatment.

Estrogen receptor alpha-36 (ER-α36): A new player in human breast cancer

Prevailing wisdom is that estrogen receptor (ER)-α mediated genomic estrogen signaling is responsible for estrogen-stimulated cell proliferation and development of ER-positive breast cancer. However, accumulating evidence indicates that another estrogen signaling pathway, non-genomic or rapid estrogen signaling, also plays an important role in mitogenic estrogen signaling. Previously, our laboratory cloned a 36 kDa variant of ER-α, ER-α36, and found that ER-α36 is mainly expressed in the cytoplasm and at the plasma membrane. ER-α36 mediates rapid estrogen signaling and inhibits genomic estrogen signaling. In this review, we review and update the biological function of ER-α36 in ER-positive and -negative breast cancer, breast cancer stem/progenitor cells and tamoxifen resistance, potential interaction and cross-talk of ER-α36 with other ERs and growth factor receptors, and intracellular pathways of ER-α36-mediated rapid estrogen signaling. The potential function and underlying mechanism of ER-α in development of ER-positive breast cancer will also be discussed.

ERα36--Another piece of the estrogen puzzle

Although the nuclear action of estrogen receptors (ER) is a well-known fact, evidence supporting membrane estrogen receptors is steadily accumulating. New ER variants of unrecognized function have been discovered. ERα is a product of the ESR1 gene. It serves not only as a template for the full-length 66kDa protein, but also for smaller isoforms which exist as independent receptors. The recently discovered ERα36 (36kDa), consisting of 310 amino acids of total 595 ERα66 protein residues, is an example of that group. The transcription initiation site is identified in the first intron of the ESR1 gene. C-Terminal 27 amino acids are encoded by previously unknown exon 9. The presence of this unique C-terminal sequence creates an opportunity for the production of selective antibodies. ERα36 has been shown to have a high affinity to the cell membrane and as much as 90% of the protein can be bound with it. Post-translational palmitoylation is suspected to play a crucial role in ERα36 anchoring to the cell membrane. In silico analysis suggests the existence of a potential transmembrane domain in ERα36. ERα36 was found in most cells of animals at various ages, but its exact physiological function remains to be fully elucidated. It seems that cells traditionally considered as being deprived of ER are able to respond to hormonal stimulation via the ERα36 receptor. Moreover, ERα36 displays unique pharmacological properties and its action may be behind antiestrogen resistance. The use of ERα36 in cancer diagnosis gives rise to great expectations.

Estrogenic endocrine disruptors: Molecular mechanisms of action

A comprehensive summary of more than 450 estrogenic chemicals including estrogenic endocrine disruptors is provided here to understand the complex and profound impact of estrogen action. First, estrogenic chemicals are categorized by structure as well as their applications, usage and effects. Second, estrogenic signaling is examined by the molecular mechanism based on the receptors, signaling pathways, crosstalk/bypassing and autocrine/paracrine/homeostatic networks involved in the signaling. Third, evaluation of estrogen action is discussed by focusing on the technologies and protocols of the assays for assessing estrogenicity. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of estrogen action is important to assess the action of endocrine disruptors and will be used for risk management based on pathway-based toxicity testing.

Role of ER-α36 in breast cancer by typical xenoestrogens

About 10 years have passed since the discovery of the estrogen receptor subtype, estrogen receptor alpha 36 (ER-α36). The relationship between cancerous cells and ER-α36 in mediating xenoestrogens (XEs) is a significant issue in the progression and treatment of breast cancer. XEs can combine with classical estrogen receptors and other receptor subtypes especially ER-α36, resulting in activation of nongenomic pathways as well as genomic pathways. Recently, most laboratories have focused on further study into the rapidly nongenomic mechanisms by overexpressing or knocking down ER-α36 in breast cancer cell lines. These rapid responses can induce the deregulation of cell cycle, and then lead to the abnormal proliferation and differentiation by regulating distinct downstream pathways. It appears that ER-α36 is a key factor in increasing risk of breast cancer. However, in several recent studies, the action mechanisms of ER-α36 by XEs in breast cancer cell lines are not always clear. In this review, we firstly summarize the expression pattern and tumor biology of ER-α36, then discuss these related estrogenic effects of ER-α36, and lastly give the predictive and prognostic value of ER-α36 as diagnostic marker by mediating typical XEs in breast cancer.

Disruption of the ER-α36-EGFR/HER2 positive regulatory loops restores tamoxifen sensitivity in tamoxifen resistance breast cancer cells

Tamoxifen provided a successful treatment for ER-positive breast cancer for many years. However, most breast tumors develop tamoxifen resistance and are eventually refractory to tamoxifen therapy. The molecular mechanisms underlying development of tamoxifen resistance have not been well established. Recently, we reported that breast cancer cells with high levels of ER-α36, a variant of ER-α, were resistant to tamoxifen and knockdown of ER-α36 expression in tamoxifen resistant cells with the shRNA method restored tamoxifen sensitivity, indicating that gained ER-α36 expression is one of the underlying mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance. Here, we found that tamoxifen induced expression of ER-α36-EGFR/HER2 positive regulatory loops and tamoxifen resistant MCF7 cells (MCF7/TAM) expressed enhanced levels of the loops. Disruption of the ER-α36-EGFR/HER2 positive regulatory loops with the dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor Lapatinib or ER-α36 down-regulator Broussoflavonol B in tamoxifen resistant MCF7 cells restored tamoxifen sensitivity. In addition, we also found both Lapatinib and Broussoflavonol B increased the growth inhibitory activity of tamoxifen in tumorsphere cells derived from MCF7/TAM cells. Our results thus demonstrated that elevated expression of the ER-α36-EGFR/HER2 loops is one of the mechanisms by which ER-positive breast cancer cells escape tamoxifen therapy. Our results thus provided a rational to develop novel therapeutic approaches for tamoxifen resistant patients by targeting the ER-α36-EGFR/HER2 loops.